Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:05]

GOOD EVENING AND WELCOME TO THE CITY OF ROWLETT PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING, TUESDAY, JANUARY 12, 2021.

I WILL CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER.

AND I WANT TO MENTION CITIZEN'S INPUT TO PROVIDE A COMMENT TO

[2. CITIZENS’ INPUT]

ANY MEETING YOU CAN SENDS AN E MAIL TO CITIZENINPUT @ROWLETT.COM BY 3 P.M. THE DAY OF THE MEETING AND SAY IF IT ABOUT AN ITEM AND IT WILL BE READ IN THE RECORD IN THE MEETING AND WELL IS A THREE MINUTE LIMIT AND NO COMMENTS TAKEN DURING THE MEETING. WE'LL MOVE TO CONSENT.

>> YES. >> WE DID GET AN ITEM ON CITIZEN INPUT THAT DOES NOT PURTAIN TO OUR AGENDA ITEMS.

>> ALL RIGHT. LET'S GO AHEAD AND HEAR THAT.

FROM LINDZA HANSEN. 8408, RICHMOND, VIRGINIA.

I OWN PROPERTY AT 3509 LAR IN ROWLETT I LIVE IN VIRGINIA BUT MY SON AND HIS CHILDREN LIVE AT THIS ADDRESS FULL TIME.

THIS PROPERTY HAS A 720 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING BUILT AS A WORKSHOP FOR A SMALL BUSINESS. I'M IN THE PROCESS OF GETTING WORK DONE SO IT CAN BE PERMITTED TO USE AS AN INLAW SUITE WHERE MY HUSBAND AND I CAN STAY WHEN WE VISIT.

THERE ARE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS IN THE STRUCTURE THAT ARE UNDERSTANDABLE AND WE'RE WORK TO COMPLIANCE.

WE HAVE BEEN COLD BY URBAN DESIGNER WE HAVE TO ADD A PARKING SPACE FOR THE MAIN HOUSE AND THE DRIVEWAY THAT IS THERE WAS FINE WHEN IT WAS BUILT AND FINE FOR OUR SON.

THEY SAY WE HAVE TO AD A THIRD PARKING SPACE FOR THE INLAW SUITE AND TO BE A CONCRETE SLAB 9 BY 20 FEET FOR EACH SPACE OUR INLAW SPACE WILL BE CUTE AND COZY BUT NOT FANCY.

ANOTHER PROBLEM WE HAVE A NICE OAK TREE NEXT TO THE SPACE WHERE THE PARKING SPACES CAN BE PUT. ONE, WE BELIEVE IT IS UNREASONABLE FOR THE CITY REQUIRE WE CREATE A SECOND PARKING SPACE FOR THE SMALL HOUSE WHEN THE DRIVEWAY THERE IS SUFFICIENT FOR OUR NEEDS AND THE SLAB WOULD DAMAGE THE ROOT SYSTEM OF THE TREE. ACCESS TO THE INLAW SUITE FROM THE ALLI IN THE BACK OF OUR PROPERTY THAT IS GRAVEL OR CRUSHED SHELL AND HAS HUGE POTHOLES AND UNREASONABLE FOR THE CITY TO REQUIRE TO HAVE A PAVED DRIVEWAY WHEN THE ALLI IS ADMIT TAKEN CARE OF.

OUR PREFERENCE TO PARK ON THE GROUND AS IS THE AREA IS HARD PACKD AND NEVER GETS MUDDY EVEN WHEN WE GET RAIN WE WOULD LIKE THIS REQUIREMENT WAIVED AND WE BE GRANTED OUR PERMIT WITHOUT ADDING CONCRETE PARKING SPACE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION AND LET PLEA KNOW IF THERE IS ANOTHER AVENUE I SHOULD PURSUE.

THAT'S IT. >> OKAY.

THANK YOU. WE WILL MOVE TO THE CONSENT

[3. CONSENT AGENDA]

AGENDA. AND WE HAVE ONE ITEM, 3A.

CONSIDER THE MINUTES OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 8, 2020. DID EVERYBODY TAKE A LOOK AT THE MINUTES? ALL RIGHT.

I NOTICED ONE THING WE MIGHT WANT TO AD WE OPENED AND CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING ON 4A. AND FAMILIAR THERE WERE SPEAKERS. ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANYTHING? NOBODY. OKAY.

I'M READY FOR A MOTION. MR. ETHAN.

>> I'D LIKE TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 8 WITH THE CORRECTIONS YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT TO BE INCLUDED.

>> DO WE HAVE A SECOND? MR. DAVIS.

OKAY. WE GOT A MOTION AND SECOND.

EVERYBODY READY TO VOTE WE WILL DO IT WITH A SHOW OF HANDS.

LET'S OF VOTE THIS . IS FOR APPROVAL WITH ONE ITEM AND THE UNANIMOUS. YOU GOT THAT?

>> I DO, THANK YOU. >> AND WE WILL MOVE ON TO NUMBER 4, ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION.

[4A. Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation to City Council for a request by Adam Shiffer, Skorburg Company, to rezone the subject property from Single-Family Residential (SF40) District to Planned Development (PD) District for Single-Family Residential (SF-5) and Limited Commercial/Retail (C-1) Uses and approval of concept plan to develop a portion of the site with 58 single-family homes. The 19.89-acre site is located on the southeast corner of Rowlett Road and Miller Road, in the City of Rowlett, Dallas County, Texas.]

AND ITEM 4A. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND

[00:05:05]

MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR A QUESTION ABOUT ADAM SCHIFFER SKORBURG COMPANY TO REZONE FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, SF40 TO PLANS DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND LIMITED COMMERCIAL RETAIL C-1 USE AND APPROVAL OF CONCEPT PLAN TO DEVELOP A PORTION OF THE SITE WITH APPELLATE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.

THE 19.89 ACRE SITE IS AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ROWLETT AND MILLER ROAD IN ROWLETT, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS AND MR. ROBERTS IS

PRESENTING? >> YES, MA'AM.

>> AS YOU JUST HEARD TONIGHT TO DISCUSS A REZONING APPLICATION FOR THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILLER AND ROWLETT ROAD.

AND THAT WOULD CHANGE THE ZONING FROM SF40 YOU SEE ON RIGHT AND LEFT, RATHER TO A PLANNED DEVELOP FOR SF5 EAST LONG BEACH CREEK AND LIMITED PARTIAL RETAIL USE C-1 WEST OF LONG RANCH CREEK TEMPERATURE IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE AT THIS TIME SHOULD BE APPROVED THE APPLICANT THE MOVE FORWARD WITH THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION, THE C-1 WILL BE ZONED SO AND WILL BE PENDING FUTURE DEVELOPER & TO FULFILL THAT. LAURA? BACKGROUNDS ON THIS REQUEST, IN OCTOBER OF 2019, THERE WAS AN APPROVAL OF REZONING SOMEWHAT SIMILAR TO THIS ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ROWLETT. CHANGING THE ZONING WITH A SINGLE FAMILY USE IN SF5 DISTRICT THIS IS INTENDED TO DEVELOP THE SOUTH EAST CORNER THAT'S WHEN WE ARE TALKING ABOUT TONIGHT W. THAT NORTHEAST CORNER.

THE THEY ARE THE SAME PEOPLE THIS WAS REVIEWED INDEPENDANTLY.

LIKEWISE, THE JUNE 23RD MEETING LAST YEAR, A REQUEST WAS BROUGHT FORWARD TO YOU BY THE CURRENT APPLICANTS.

IT WAS A COMPLETE SF5 PRINCIPLE THAT WAS NO COMMERCIAL COMPONENT. IT WAS DENIED.

WITH DRAWN PRIOR DUE TO ISSUES WITH DENSITY, LOT SIZES AND THE LACK OF COMMERCIAL SPACE. IT WAS BROUGHT FORWARD TONIGHT'S PROPOSAL THEY FEEL THEY HAVE ADDRESSED THE ISSUES.

SO. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

SITE DATA FOR YOU. SHY OF 20 ACRES ON THAT SOUTHEAST CORNER OF MILLER AND ROWLETT ROADS.

CURRENTLY, HAS A VARIETY OF STRUCTURES MORE TOWARD THE EAST.

IT IS TWO DIFFERENT TRACTS, TWO DIFFERENT PROPERTIES.

IN THIS APPLICATION THERE WILL BE CONSIDERED ONE IN COMBINED.

SHY OF A THOUSAND FEET OF FRONTAGE ON THE ROADS 3.7 ACRES OF FLOOD PLAIN YOU SEE IN PINK, GREEN AND BLUE.

WORKING FROM THE NORTHWEST DOWN TOWARD THE CENTER SOUTH.

THAT'S PART OF THE LONG RANCH CREEK.

TRAFFIC CIRCULATION CONSIDERATION FOR THE PROPOSAL.

THIS -- SLIDE MOSTLY PERTAINING TO THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION EAST OF LONG RANCH CREEK. PROPOSED FROM TWO POINTS ALONG MILLER ROAD. THE WESTERN MOST OF WHICH ALLOWS FOR A RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT CONDITION.

THE EASTERN MOST ALLOWING FOR FULL ACCESS DUE TO A PRE-EXISTING MEETING BREAK. A BIT ON THIS THE NORTHERN PORTION APPROVED IN 2019 OUT LINED A MEDIAN BREAK.

[00:10:05]

YOU SEE IT THERE IN THE UPPER LEFT.

AS PART OF THAT PROPOSAL. THAT HAS NOT BEEN REALIZED QUITE YET AND AS PART OF THIS PROPOSAL, GIVEN THE ALINEMENT OF THAT WESTERN INTERIOR STREAK WE RUN INTO A DANGEROUS CONDITION SHOWN BY THAT PURPLE EMARROW THERE.

THAT IS CONSIDERED DANGEROUS. PART OF THIS APPLICATION SHOULD THIS BE APPROVED THIS WOULD OVER RIDE THAT MEDIUM BREAK APPROVED WITH THE NORTHERN PROPOSAL. IN ORDER TO PREVENT THAT MANY RIGHT THERE. THAT IS A LITTLE INFORMATION ON THAT FOR YOU. MOVING TO COMMERCIAL SIDE OF THINGS. WHILE NOT REQUIRED TO USE THEM ANY FUTURE DEVELOPER SHOULD THIS BE APPROVED HAS THE OPPORTUNITY OF TWO EXISTING CUT OUTS OF SORTS IN ROWLETT ROAD.

ONE OF WHICH IS A RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT THE NORTHERNMOST ONE AND THE SOUTHERN MOST ONE DUE TO AN EXISTING MEDIUM BREAK WOULD GIVE US FULL ACCESS. THAT'S FOR CONSIDERATION OF THOSE FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE, LAURA? VERY QUICKLY CALL ON JEFF TO GIVE US A BREAK DOWN ON DRAINAGE IMPLICATIONS A PART OF A LARGER WATERSHED. JEFF, COULD YOU TAKE OVER THAT? THANK YOU, CORN. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS.

I WANT TO SUMMARIZE THE DRAINAGE IMPLICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT.

THE IMAGE THAT YOU SEE AT THE RIGHT IS THE WATERSHED THE ENTIRE WATERSHED FOR LONG BRANCH CREEK.

IT IS ABOUT 2.1 SQUARE MILES. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THAT WE ARE CONSIDERING TONIGHT IS THAT DARKER BLOCK IN THE CENTER LOWER CENTER OF THE WATERSHED. THE DARK BLUE LINE THAT FOLLOWS UP THE MIDDLE OF THE LIGHTER PURPLE EMAREA IS LONG BRANCH ITSELF. THERE IS A TRIBUTARY SHOOTING OFF TO THE EAST. SO, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ABOUT 20 ACRES, WHICH CONSTITUTES LESS THAN 1 AND A HALF PERCENT OF THE ENTIRE WATERSHED AND VISUALLY YOU CAN SEE WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THERE.

THE -- THE THE FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY DONE FOR LONG BRANCH SEVERAL YEARS AGO AT INTERSECTION OF ROWLETT AND MILLER ROAD THE NORTH WESTERN CORNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, AS YOU SEE IN THE IMAGE. THAT FLOW IS 4800 CUBIC FEET PER SECOND THAT IS A FLOW RATE. THE APPLICANT HAS DONE A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE PROPERTY IN ITS CURRENT CONDITION UNDEVELOPED, RECONSTRUCTION, WHICH SAYS THAT THE ESTIMATED FLOW FROM THE PROPERTY INTO LONG BRANCH IS ABOUT 65 CUBIC FEET PER SECOND. WHICH IS ALSO UNSURPRISINGLY 1 AND A HALF % OF THE FLOW THIS IS COMING DOWN LONG BRANCH AT THAT POINT. THE APPLICANT WOULD BE REQUIRED BY OUR CODE TO LIMIT THE DISCHARGE FROM THEIR PROPERTY UPON LIMIT THAT DISCHARGE TO THE PRECONSTRUCTION UNDEVELOPED RATE WHICH IS AS I EXPLAINED 65 CUBIC FEET.

THAT IS TYPICALLY DONE BY DETENTION WHETHER UNDER GROUNDS DETENTION A RESERVOIR THAT HOLDS THE WATER AND DISCHARGE BACK.

A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TIME AND MEETS THAT DISCHARGE OUT AT A CONTROLLED RATE. WITH THAT IN CONSIDERATION IT IS UNLIKELY THAT WE WOULD SEE SIGNIFICANT IMPACT TO LONG

[00:15:02]

BRANCH CREEK AND DOWN STREAM USERS.

I THINK THAT IS ALL, CONNOR. BACK TO YOU.

THANK YOU. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

SO AS USUAL WE TAKE A LOOK AT THE SURROUNDING PATTERN.

THE ZONING DISTRICTS REQUIREMENTS AND THE SURROUNDING BUILT ENVIRONMENT. THIS BEING THE SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN, WE SEE THAT AGAIN THERE IS THAT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PD ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER, WHICH IS NORTH OF THIS SITE. TO THE SOUTH, WE HAVE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R2 USE THAT'S AN OLDER MID INTENSITY SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT FROM A PREVIOUS CODE. LIKEWISE, MOVING EAST, WE SEE THE PD FOR R-1 USES THAT IS MORE HIGHER INTENSITY AND AN OLDER CODE. SF-40 EXISTING TO THE EAST.

AND SOUTHEAST AGAIN TO THE WEST. THERE IS THE GAS STATION ON THE HARD CORNER FOLLOWED BY A C-1 COMMERCIAL RETAIL DISTRICT.

YOU WILL SEE THAT IF APPROVED THE PROPOSED PD FOR C-1 WEST OF LONG RANCH CREEK WILL COMPLIMENT THE, THE WESTERN CORNERS OF THE SAME INTERSECTION. SO.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE, LAURA? MOVING TO THE MINIMUM ZONING REQUIREMENTS THIS TIME LOOKING AT RESIDENTIAL.

THE SINGLE FAMILY SF-40 TO THE EAST AND SOUTHEAST BEING THE MOST LARGEST DISTRICT WE HAVE FOR OUR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE TYPES. 40,000 SQUARE FEET.

MINIMUM BUILDING OF 2400 SQUARE FEET.

DIFFERENT FROM THIS PROPOSAL TO THE SOUTH THE R-2 USE THE MINIMUM IS 7800 AND BUILDING AREA 1500 AND MOVING WEST 4,000 AND 1200 LIKEWISE. SO, AGAIN AT THE BOTTOM YOU SEE THE BOTTOM OF THE TABLE YOU SEE OUR PROPOSAL THIS TIME A RANGE OF 4800 TO 72 HUNDRED AND I WILL DIVE INTO THAT SHORTLY AND ANOTHER RANGE FOR BUILDING AIR 1800 TO 2 THOUSAND.

I WILL TALK ABOUT THAT LATER. WE KNOW THAT THE MINIMUM ZONING REQUIREMENTS DON'T MATCH THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT.

NEXT SLIDE, LAURA? USING THE INFORMATION VALUABLE WE HAVE DONE OUR BEST TO PROVIDE AVERAGES OF WHAT THEY BUILT OUT TO BE. AND YOU SEE THE SIGNIFICANT SIZES TO THE EAST AND SOUTHEAST. AS WELL AS HOME SIZES 2800 SQUARE FEET. TO THE SOUTH LOOKING WITHIN THE 500 FOOT RANGE AVERAGE LOT SIZE IS 17,000 SQUARE FEET.

MOVING WEST. JUST MORE THAN 5500 SO THE PROPOSED MINIMUM LOT RANGE 4800 TO 7200, WILL RESULT IN AN AVERAGE LOT SIZE BASED ON THE APPLICANT'S SUBMITTAL OF LESS THAN THE BUILT AVERAGE TO THE SOUTH AND EAST AND AS THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPOSAL, 30 OF THE 58 LOTS.

OVER HALF WOULD BE 4800 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUMS. THE PROPOSED BUILDING AREA RANGE OF 1800 TO 2,000 WILL BE GREATER THAN THE BUILT AVERAGE TO THE SOUTH.

SO WE CAN SEE SOME INCOMPATIBILITIES THERE.

UM -- OF COURSE, WE TURN TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH ANY REZONING CASE TO SEE WHERE WE WANT THE PROPERTIES TO BE GOING.

THERE IS A SPLIT FROM A STATE RESIDENTIAL, WHICH IS ON THE EAST SIDE OF LONG BRANCH CREEK AND THE RENAIL RED THERE WEST OF

[00:20:03]

LONG RANCH CREEK. THE STATE RESIDENTIAL OR LOTS OVERRULE 20,000 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE AND RETAIL COMMERCIAL OFFICE DESIGNATIONS COULD ISSUE ALONG THE THOROUGH FARES AND SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL. WITH THE AVERAGE MINIMUM LOT SIZE LOOK TO BE UNDER THE MEDIUM DENSITY OF 7,000 SQUARE FEET.

LET ALONE THE ESTATE OF RESIDENTIAL.

SO IN THAT ESSENCE THE RESIDENTIAL SPOERGZ NOT IN CONGRUENCE. HOWEVER, THE PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION FOR THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE SITE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

MOVING INTO THE ACTUAL PROPOSAL WHEN WE LOOK FIRST AT THE COMMERCIAL PORTION. THE BASE ZONING IS C-1.

YOU KNOW IF NOT SPECIFIED IN THE PD WE REFER BACK TO THAT.

THAT -- CODE STANDARD AS AMENDED AND REALLY THE LIMITS OF THE PROSECUTE ALTERATIONS TO THE C-1 ON SCREEN FOR YOU.

WE ADDED A REQUIREMENT THAT A DETAIL PLAN APPROVED VIA A PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS. BUILDING FACE ROWLETT ROAD WITH LIMITED PARKING IN FRONT TO ENCOURAGE THEM TO BE BUILT CLOSE TO ROWLETT ROAD AND INCLUDED REVISED TABLE OF ALLOWED USES THAT IS ON THE NEXT SLIDE. FUL FURTHER TAILER THE SITE AND STAFF WHAT THOUGHT WAS MORE APPROPRIATE USES.

TRIMMING USES IN THE C-1 DISTRICT IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A GOOD OPPORTUNITY FOR SUPPORTIVE COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS TO THE VOUNDZING RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS. NEXT SLIDE.

MOVING ON TO THE RENTIAL PORTION THE BULK OF THE PROPOSAL PLAN REFLECTS 58 LOT IN TOTAL. THERE WILL BE 7 COMMON AREA LOTTEDS MARK IN THE GREEN. THE COMMUNITY GARDEN IN THE LOTS THE CENTRAL IN THE MIDDLE BLOCK AND BENCHES AND GAZEBO AND 8 FOOT WALKING PATH ALONG RANCH CREEK.

AND THE OTHER OPEN SPACE RESERVED FOR THE LAND SCAPE BUFFERS OR OTHER DETENTION OR EASEMENT FENGZS. IMPORTANT THING TO NOTE IS THE MINIMAL LOT SIZES DIFFER BY COLOR.

THERE WILL BE 30 TYPE A LOTS AND THOSE WILL BE IN YELLOW.

THEIR THOSE HAVE A MINIMUM OF 4800 SQUARE FOOT LOT SIZES.

TIME B LOT IN PINK. 12 OF THEM AT 6,000 SQUARE FEET A PIECE AND 16 TYPE C ON THE EAST AND SOUTH.

THOSE AT 7200 SQUARE FEET IN ORANGE.

MINIMUM AREA FOR THE PI TYPE A LOTS, THOSE ARE YELLOW OR 1800 SQUARE FEET. THE PINK AND ORANGE B AND C LOTS ARE 2,000 SCARE FEET MINIMUMS AND FRONT ENTRY GARAGE CONDITION FIGURATIONS FOR THE LOTS SINCE THERE ARE NO ALES THE TYPE A AND B LOTS WILL HAVE A STRAIGHT FRONT KNOW ENTRY CONDITION AND TYPE C LOTS THE ORANGE LOTS TWO IN ONE CONFIGURATION.

A JAY HOOK WHERE THE TWO CAR GARAGE FACE AWAY FROM THE STREET AND THE ONE CAR FACE TOWARD THE STREET.

A HYBRID OF SORTS FROM OUR TYPICAL JAY HOOK CONDITIONS.

NEXT SLIDE. A FEW SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR SOME OF THE OPEN SPACE. A FEW ARE NOT AMENITIES BARRING THE WALKING TRAIL AND HO A LOT 23.

IT IS PROPOSED AS RETENTION. THE AREAS HIGHLIGHTED IN RED ON

[00:25:06]

SCREEN, STAFF POINTED OUT POTENTIAL AREAS OF ISSUE ON THE MERIT THEY COULD POSE MAINTENANCE CHALLENGES THAT LITTLE SLIVER CENTERED IN SCREEN BETWEEN A RETAINING WALL, THE DASH LINE. TWO FENCES.

THEY COULD BE POSE SOME ISSUES AND SO THE STAFF DURING REVIEW -- YOU KNOW IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THERE IS NO BUFFER REQUIREMENT BETWEEN SINGLE FAMILY AND EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS. HOWEVER IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS MIGHT HAVE BEEN SPURRED BY WANTING TO GIFT EXISTING THEIRS SPACE. IF THIS IS THE CASE STAFF'S PREFERENCE IS THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO AMENITY TO USE THEM THE NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. WITH THE CONCEPT PLAN A VARIETY OF VARIANCES FROM OUR RESIDENTIAL STANDARDSES IN THE RDC, QUICKLY WE ARE LOOKING AT ALLI WAIVERS WITH NO RECESS.

FRONT GARAGES. NONUNIVERSAL CONDITIONS.

REDUCTION IN THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE REQUIREMENTS.

REDUCTION IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH REQUIREMENTS.

AND E ELIMINATION OF THE PRIMARY AND SECTIONARY FEATURES.

REDUCTION IN THE LOT WIDTH AND REAR YARDS.

REAR YARD SETBACK AND LOT WIDTHS AND INCREASING MAX HEIGHT, SLIGHTLY. WE WILL GO IN DETAIL OF THESE IN ORDER. ALLI WAYS ARE INTENDSED DO A VARIETY OF THINGS. INCLUDING UTILITY AND TRASH PICK AND UP REPLACEMENT. LEARNINGLY THEY PROVIDE RESIDENCE DIDN'TS WITH ALTERNATIVES TO PARKING ON THE STREET FOR OUR EMERGENCY SERVICE ACCESS AND VEHICULAR ACCESS FOR RESIDENTS. AND THEY ENCOURAGE HOMES TO BE BUILT CLOSER TO THE STREET NOTERS MORE WALKABILITY COMPONENT. WHEN FRONT ENTRIES ARE ALLOWED NEEDING AN ALLI WAIVER HAS BEEN GRANTED.

IF NOT THEN THE GARAGE DOORS COMPRISED MORE THAN 25% OF THE 4 FOOT RECESSES REQUIRED TO PROVIDE DEPTH AWAY FROM THE STREETS. AGAIN, THERE IS A REQUEST FOR DEVIATIONS TO THESE THE APPLICANTS JUSTIFICATION IS THE PROPOSED LOT WIDTH OF 40 FEET AND THEY'RE LIMITING FACTORS.

LOOKING AT THE SURROUNDING DISTRICTS ON THE LOWER LEFT OF THE SCREEN, LARGELY COMPLY WITH THE ALLI REQUIREMENT ITSELF.

WITH PROPERTIES TO THE EAST AND SOME TO THE SOUTH PROVIDING J HOOK APPROACHES WHEN NOT HAVING ALLEYS.

THE PROPOSED LOT WIDTH AS A JUSTIFICATION WAS NOT CONSIDERED SATISFY. YOU SEE THE PHOTO AT RIGHT OUT OF THE BAY SIDE DISTRICT WHERE THERE IS OBVIOUSLY HAS BEEN SIGNIFICANT UPON JAY HOOK CONSCIENCE ARE PROSECUTE POSED FOR TYPE C LOTS, WHICH COMPRISE 28% OF THE LOT DISTRIBUTION.

AGAIN, WHEN NO ALLEYS ARE PROVIDE TODAY IS PREFERRED.

YOU SEE THE IMAGE ON THE RIGHT THERE NOT EQUIPABLE HERE UPON BEGIN THE 25 FOOT SETBACK THAT ACCOUNTS FOR 20.

WE WILL --. I IMAGINE WE WILL 5 MORE FEET.

YOU SEE THAT JAY HOOK PROVIDES MORE DEPTH AN ALTERNATIVE TO PARKING ON THE STREET. LIKEWISE, THE 25 FOOT SETBACK

[00:30:01]

PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT WILL MEET INTENT OF THE CODE FOR THE 4 FOOT RECESS THAT WAS A CONVERSATION WE HAD WITH THEM INCREASING THAT FRONT SETBACK FROM 20 TO 25 IN THE PREVIOUS PROPOSAL ACCOMMODATED THAT 4 FOOT RECESS.

WITH THE 25 FEET, AS YOU SEE TO THE LOWER LEFT, WHILE THOSE ARE 20. FOOT SETBACKS I'M NOT SURETY EXTRA 5 FEET WOULD HAVE HELPED. RESIDENTS MAKING SURE THAT PUBLIC REALM IS PROTECTED AND OPEN.

THOSE ARE JUST EXAMPLES OF -- PROBLEMS WE MIGHT HAVE.

AND OPPORTUNITY TO GIVE RESIDENTS AS MUCH OFF STREET PARKING AS WE CAN. MOVING ON, MINIMAL LOT SIZE REDUCTION. A REDUCTION IN THE MINIMUM FROM 5,000 TO 4800 NOW THERE IS THAT RANGE UP TO 7200 FOR THE TYPE C LOTS. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE EXISTING ZONING REQUIREMENT IS 40,000 SQUARE FEET.

SHARES THAT REQUIREMENT WITH PROPERTIES TO THE EAST AND SOUTHEAST. SF-5 DISTRICT IS A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION DOWN TO 5,000 SQUARE FEET.

THE BATTLE BROUGHTED DOWN TO 48. PROPOSED MINIMUM REQUIREMENT 4800 IS SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS TO THE EAST AND THE SOUTH.

REDUCTION IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUESTS, THE CODE IS EXPLICIT AND THE REQUIREMENT 60 AM FOOT MINOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS UNLESS A RECOMMENDATION GRANTED BY PUBLIC WORKS ALLOWING FOR 50 FEET WE WANT TO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT THE PUBLIC WORK SYSTEM NOT UPON GIVEN THAT RECOMMENDATION. WILL RIGHT-OF-WAY RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH IS INTENDED ALLOW FOR UTILITY PLACEMENT IN FRONT AND MORE SEPARATION FROM THE PAVEMENT FOR HOMES.

IN A BIT LARGER AREA FOR THE SIDEWALK WITH THE UTILITY ACCOMPLICEMENT. THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WHEN ADDED TO THE CONDITIONS COULD RESULT IN ADVERSE IMPLICATIONS ON UTILITY AND EMERGENCY SERVICE ACCESS. I WANT TO WHICH NOTE AT THE FRONT OF YOUR REPORT THAT AT THE TIME OF FINAL IEGZ THE REPORT UPON THE APPLICANT STATED THEY WOULD ADJUST THE CONCEPT PLAN TO ACCOMMODATE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE PROBLEM IS WE NOTICED AND NOTICED THE PUBLIC AND BEGUN OUR PROCESS AND FINISHED OUR REVIEW.

OF TONIGHT STAFF CAN SPEAK TO THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SITE WE HAVE NOT REVIEWED WHAT DOMINO AFFECT THAT MIGHT HAVE. JUST TO NAME A FEW WE ARE STHARN LOT AREAS WILL SHRINK AND SETBACKS AS WELL.

TONIGHT WE ARE SPEAKING TO WHEN WE HAVE AND THAT IS A REQUEST FOR THE REDUCTION TO 50 FEET WICH PUBLIC WORKS HAS NOT GIVEN THE RECOMMENDATION. .

SO -- NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE, LAURA? MOVE TO FEATURES -- IT IS AN ELEMENT IN THE CODE LANDSCAPING AS A TWOFOLD INTENT FROM THE CODE TO PROVIDE A SENSE OF PLACE YOU ENTER THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS WELL AS A PHYSICAL BARRIER SORT OF A SLOW DOWN AREA FROM IN THIS CASE, CHAD BE A LARGELY TRAVELED MILLER ROAD TO THE LOCAL MINOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS. NEXT SLIDE, LAURA.

THEY HAVE GIVEN US AN INCLINATION OF THE FIRST INTENT OF CREATING A SENSE OF SPACE WITH THE TRAIL HEAD FEATURE ALONG THE TRAIL AND AS WELL AS IN A MEDIAN ON THE EASTERN MOST

[00:35:02]

ENTRANCE. WHILE THAT DOES PLAY IN THE SENSE OF PLACE INTENT, FURTHER DOWN FROM MILL ARE ROAD WOULD WORK TO ACCOMMODATE THE INTENT OF PROVIDING THAT PHYSICAL SEPARATION FROM MILLER ROAD. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

LAURA. GETTING TOWARD THE END OF THE DEVIATIONS DECREASING THE LOT WIDTH THIS TIES IN THE MINIMUM LOT AREA REQUEST. THEREUPON IS A RANGE 40 TO 60 FEET THAT WOULD BE YOUR 4800 TO 7200 WITH THE LOT DEPTHS PR PRO PROVIDED.

IT IS REQUIRED TO BE SURE WE DON'T OVER SUBDIVIDE PROPERTY.

RECOMMENDED SF-5 IS OUR LOWEST OR SMALLEST LOT, YOU KNOW DIVISIONS. RECOMMEND THAT LOT.

WOULD REMAIN AT 50 FEET. AND WE NOTE UPON SURROUNDING HOMES TO THE EAST AND SOUTH HAVE REGULAR LOT WIDTHS THE BASE LOT WIDTH OF 120 FEET AND 70 FEET. NEXT SLIDE.

MINIMUM REAR SETBACK FROM 25 TO 15 FEET.

WITH THE ALLI WAIVER, THIS 15 FOOT SETBACK, 91 OF THAT WOULD BE EATEN UP BY A REAR DRIVEWAY. HOWEVER, IT WOULD WILL RESULT IN SOME OFFY THESE MORE DENSE LOTS BACK CLOSER ON ADJACENT LOTS.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. AND THE LAST ONE THERE BEING THAT INCREASE FROM 35 FEET FOR 2 STORIES TO 3692ET IS TO ACCOMMODATE THE TYPE OF PRODUCT OUR APPLICANTS ARE FAMILIAR WITH WE DON'T SEE A NEGATIVE IMPACT TO THAT.

NOTHING NOTICEABLE THERE. AS USUAL STAFF LOOKS TO OUR SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOOD'S GOAL HAD REVIEWING NEW NEIGHBORHOODS OF THIS KIND. PER THE PLAN.

THIS PLACE FOCUSES ON INCORPORATING HOUSING TYPES AND LOT TYPES AND SHAPES. THAT WILL ADD TO DIVERSITY AND ATTRACT A WIDER BASE OF RESIDENTS.

IT IS IMPORTANT THAT SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOODS PLAY TO THE SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT. ARGUE WITH THE TRAIL THAT IS ACHIEVED. HOWEVER, THERE ARE OTHER LITTLE OTHER -- REFERENCES ALONG THAT LONG BRANCH CREEK WITH THE LAYOUT OF THE LOTS. LIKEWISE, THE LACK OF HOME SIZE DOES NOT PLAY IN OUR DIVERSITY WELL.

NEXT SLIDE, LAURA. OF SITE PHOTOS FOR YOU.

THIS IS ON ROWLETT IN ROAD LOOKING TO THE COMMERCIAL PORTION. YOU SEE THE DEPTH UP TO THE CREEK THIS IS CLOSER TO THE INTERSECTION.

THE TURN LANE, NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

HERE ON MILLER ROAD LOOKING SOUTH TOWARD THE RESIDENTIALING PORTION. YOU SEE THE GRADED WORK.

NEXT SLIDE, LAURA? OF COURSE NOTICED FOR THIS PROPOSAL DECEMBER 23RD, 31, 200 AND 54, 500 NOTICES WERE SENT, YOU RECEIVED TODAY A REVISED LIST OF RESPONSES.

ADDING UP TO THE TOTALS HERE 4 IN OPPOSITION.

THE 2 HUH LEGAL NOTICE FWHON FAVOR.

AND 500 FOOT NOTICES FOR IN OPPOSITION.

WE RECEIVED 4 NOTICES IN OPPOSITION BEYOND THE 500 FOOT AREA AND DUE TO THE AREA OF THE OPPOSITIONS WITHIN 200 FEET, THAT EXCEEDS OUR 20% LIMIT OF THE SUBJECT SITE.

MEANING A SUPER MAJORITY VOTE WILL BE REQUIRED FROM THE COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL OF THIS. DUE TO THE OPPOSITIONS.

NEXT SLIDE. PLEASE.

[00:40:01]

FINALLY STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION WILL BE DENIAL OF THE REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PERMANENT. WHILE THE COMMERCIAL COMSPOKEN IN ALINEMENT WITH THE COMP PLAN, THE RESIDENTIAL DENSITY DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF THE PD DISTRICT TO ACCOMMODATE ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT RESULTING OF HIGHER QUALITY.

AM LOT DIMENSIONS AND THE PROPOSALS SEEM TO BE LEARNINGLY GOVERNED BY A BUSINESS MODEL RATHER THAN THE REGULATIONS OF THE RDC. AND DON'T TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION IN TERMS OF LOT ORIENTATION OF THE FEATURES OF THE SITE. NEXT SLIDE.

AND WITH THAT, THAT IS THE ENDS OF THE PRESENTATION.

OF COURSE, STAFF IS AVAILABLE FOR COMMENTS TO ANSWER ANYTHING AND THE APPLICANT HAS A PRESENTATION.

WOULD YOU LIKE TO COMMISSIONERS WAIT UNTIL THE APPLICANT HAS PRESENTED BEFORE YOU DO QUESTIONS OR DO YOU WANT TO PRESENT QUESTIONS TO STAFF AT THIS TIME? ANYBODY? OKAY.

UPON IF THE APPLICANT IS HERE AND -- WANTS TO PRESENT THEN LET'S BRING THEM FORWARD. AND STATE YOUR NAME JOHN AROUND SKORBURG COMPANY. DALLAS, TEXAS 75225.

THANK YOU Y'ALL FOR HAVING US TONIGHT.

BACK TO PRESENT WIND GATE MANNER AGAIN.

DO I SAY NEXT SLIDE. OKAY.

THAT WORKS THAT IS AUTOMATIC. OF AS CONNOR JUST SPOKE ABOUT ONE OF THE FIRST THING I WANTED BRING UP IS THAT WE ARE WORKING WITH OUR BUILDER AND STAFF LATE LAST WEEK.

BUILDERS WORKING ON ADJUSTING THEIR PLANS TO MAKE CHANGES TO THEIR PRODUCT. TO BE ABLE TO FIT TO A 60 FOOT RIGHT OF WACHL WE HAVE DONE 4 OR 5 PROJECT IN ROWLETT TO DATE THE LAST 3 TO 4 YEARS SPECIAL THEY HAVE ALL BEEN APPROVED WITH 50 FOOT RIGHT AWAY. THE 60 FOOT WAS NOT PART OF -- NOT AN ISSUE ON OUR LAST TIME WE PRESENT THIRD DEGREE AND WE DIDN'T FOCUS ON IT BECAUSE OF OUR PROJECTS BEING ACCEPTED WITH THE 60 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE COMMENT TO GET STAFF APPROVAL OR PUBLIC WORK APPROVAL WAS WE TOOK IT AS A COMMENT.

WITH CHANGE IN STAFF AND CHANGE IN THE FIRE CHIEF THE 60 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY IS A BIGGER FOCUS. SO NOW US IS A FOCUS WE ARE WILLING TO DO THAT 60 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY.

IT WILL HOWEVER PUSH THE STREET WILL BE THE SAME SIZE EITHER WAY. IT WILL PUSH OUR PAD, WE WANT THE SAME 25 FOOT SETBACK OFF OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.

. TO KEEP CARS FROM REACHING OVER THE SIDEWALK TO KEEP 26 FOOT FROM SIDEWALK AND THE GARAGE WE KEEP PEOPLE OFF THE SIDEWALKS. THAT IS A CONCERN OF CITY AND STAFF AND OURS. WHAT IT WOULD DO IS DECREASE OUR LOT SIZE TO 115 FOOT AND WE WILL PUSH THE REAR SETBACK TO 10 FOOT SOME OF OUR PRODUCT IS 80 FOOT. WE DO OUR PATHS AT 80 FOOT.

SOMEWHERE 65 BUT WE HAVE 80 FOOT AND PAD OUT THE PROJECT FOR ALL 80 FOOT PADS. WE WANT TO KEEP THE 80 FOOT PADS. SDWROUFT THAN WE ARE WILLING TO DO THAT 60 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY IS THAT SOMETHING HAY WOULD BE WILLING TO APPROVE THE PROJECT WITH THAT CONDITION HOPEFULLY STAFF AND OURSELVES CAN WORK OUT DETAILS BETWEEN NOW AND COUNCIL.

THAT WOULD BE OUR FIRST REQUEST. NEXT SLIDE.

THIS IS JUST OUR TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR THE PROJECT.

I WILL GO QUICKLY MOST YOU KNOW US SOMEWHERE NEW.

I WILL GO OVER OUR PROJECTS THE LOCATION.

BECAUSE ALEX DID A GOOD JOB WE KNOW WHERE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT.

[00:45:05]

FEEDBACK AND SITE HISTORY THROUGH THE ZONING REQUESTS FOR THIS SITE. OUR REQUEST AND ADDRESSING THE CITY CONCERNS THAT CONNOR BROUGHT UP.

IN HIS PERSONALITIATION. WE WILL GO THROUGH ONE BY ONE AND SHOW YOU HOW WE ARE ADDRESSING THOSE CONCERNS.

FIRST IS MANNERS ON MILL TERIS DOWN THE STREET.

50 FOOT LOTS. 39 OF THEM ON 8 MAP ACRE SITE THIS PROJECT SOLD OUT HOPEFUL. HOPEFUL LEAVE EVERYONE HAD A CHANCE TOP DRIVE THROUGH IT WE'RE PROUD OF THE PROJECTS WINDSOR HOMES WERE THE BUILDER. IT WAS A SUCCESSFUL PROJECT.

REASON WHY WE HAVE FOCUSED ON THIS AREA IN ROWLETT AND ROWLETT ITSELF. WILLOWWOOD ESTATES ON CHEESE ROAD THAT IS 50 FOOT LOTS FRONT ENTRY.

31 BACK-TO-BACK PAVEMENT. SIMILAR PRODUCT TO WHAT WE WOULD BUILD HERE IN A PORTION OF OUR LOTS.

NEXT SLIDE. 60 FOOT LOTS YOU GET A TASTE WHAT THE 60 FOOT LOT WOULD LOOK LIKE.

LOW ARE LEFT PICTURE. 27 LOTS ON WOOD SIDE DRIVE ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE SCHOOL.

THEY ARE 60 FOOT BY 115 TO 145. WE HAVE A SIMILAR LOT SIZE ON THIS SOME OF THE LOTS ARE SIMILAR IN LOT SIZE.

MERIT VILLAGE IS ANOTHER PROJECT WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF CONSTRUCTING NOW. YOU WILL SEE, WE ARE NOT 100% OPPOSED. THE PROJECT HAS A MIX OF WILL ALLI AND FRONT ENTRY 60 FOOT LOTS.

ALCOHOL HAVE A MIX OF JAY SWING AND FRONT ENTRY AND ALLI.

A MIX OF ALL IN THE PROJECT. NEXT SLIDE.

LONG BRANCH A PROJECT ACROSS THE STREET.

THIS IS ALONG THE SAME OF LONG BRANCH.

THIS PROJECT IS PAVED AND HOPEFULLY OPENING IN THE NEXT COUPLE MONTHS FOR SALE. NEXT PROJECT.

OR SLIDE. PROPERTY LOCATION, NEXT SLIDE.

THIS IS A SLIDE TO SHOW WHERE THE PROJECTS WE SHOWED YOU ARE IN RELATION TO OUR WINGATE MANNER.

SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATION AS -- COBBER POINTED OUT, THIS IS A SLIDE SO SHOWING THE PROPERTY IN ZONING.

CONNOR'S SLIDE WAS MORE ZOOMED IN.

WE'LL SHOW YOU IN MULTIPLE SLIDES MORE ZOOMED OUT VERSION OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT. AND WE'LL GO IN THAT IN DETAIL WE WANT TO POINT OUT THAT OUR PROPOSAL IS VERY SIMILAR TO TWO OF THE 4 CORNERS AND -- CLOSER RELATED TO ANOTHER THIRD.

IN THIS AREA WE HAVE MULTIPLE PROJECTS WITH 40 FOOT FRONT LOTS. ACROSS THE STREET AND ALLEY ACROSS TO THE NORTH AND ACROSS THE STREET TO THE WEST.

MULTIFAMILY IN THE YOUR AND HIGH INTENSITY COMMERCIAL.

THIS IS A STLIED SHOES THE TWO PROPERTIES AS CONNOR SAID OUR INTENT WAS TO WORK ON THE TWO PROJECTS BUT THEY WERE OWNED BY DIFFERENT OWNERS AND DID NOT WORK OUST THAT WAY.

WE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO ZONE THEM TOGETHER THAT WAS NOT THE CASE.

NOW WE ARE WERE BACK WITH THIS PROPERTY.

YOU SEE THROUGH THE SLIDE THEY ARE COMPLEMENTARY PROJECTS ADJACENT TO EACH OTHER. NEXT SLIDE.

THIS PROJECT WAS BROUGHT NOTICE BY US IN 2018 FOR 175 TOWN HOME

[00:50:05]

LOTS. THAT WAS A HEATED CASE AND A CLOSE CASE. RECOMMENDED DENIAL.

IFIY 4-3 AND ONE TRAEN CAUGHT OUR ATTENTION WE WERE LOOK TO ZONE THE COMMERCIAL CROSS THE STREET TO THE WEST.

THAT WAS DENIED AND -- THAT WAS DENIED THE SAME TIME AS THIS ONE. THIS WAS DENIED.

WE DON'T NEED NAHIGH DENSITY TO MAKE IT WORK WE HAVE A GREAT PRODUCT AND LIKE TO PRESENT THAT TO THE CITY OF ROWLETT.

IT WAS APPROVED BEFORE TO THE NORTH AND WE HOPE THAT WE CAN GET A SIMILAR PROJECT APPROVED TONIGHT WE WILL CAME TO YOU THIS SUMMER WITH A PROJECT THAT WAS ALL 40 FOOT LOTS AND NO COMMERCIAL THAT WAS DEAD ON ARRIVAL.

COMMERCIAL WAS A BIG COMPONENT AND THE UPON DENSITY WAS AN ISSUE. WE WORKED ON IT WITH STAFF FOR A COUPLE MONTES AND CAME BACK WITH 72 LOTS AND COMMERCIAL BUT WE WITH DREW THAT DUE TO COMMENTS AND FEEDBACK FROM NEIGHBORS AND STAFF. .

SO WE UPON WENT BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD, NEXT SLIDE.

THIS SLIDE SHOWS COMPARISON FROM WHERE WE STARTED TO WHERE WE ARE TODAY. WE WENT WE HAVE 30 FEWER LOTS FROM WHEN WE STARTED THE AVERAGE LOT SIZE FROM ALL 4800 TO SICK,000 PLUS OR MINUS 6,000 UPON SQUARE FEET AVERAGES.

CHANGE FRIDAY ALL 40S TO 40S, 50S AND 60S.

INCREASED OUR MINIMUM DWELLINGS ON THE 40S AND ON THE 50S AND 60S. ADD THE COMMERCIAL ZONING.

STAFF AND PMZ'S Q. INCORPORATED NATURAL FEATURES.

REDUCED THE AREA IN THE FLOOD PLAIN.

WE HAVE MORE ROOM FOR THE TRAIL AND ADDED OPEN SPACE IN THE CENTER WITH A COMMUNITY GARDEN. OVER ALL WE HAVE GONE DOWN FRESHMAN 88 TO 58 LOTS. ADDED COMMERCIAL AND MAINTAINED THE HIGH QUALITY PRODUCT WINDSOR HAVE BEEN KNOWN FOR.

I'D LIKE TO GET TO THE POINTSES CONNOR HAS GONE THROUGH TEMPERATURE WE HAVE A MIX OF UPON 16, 60 FOOT LOTS AND 30, 40 FOOT LOTS ON 12.5 ACRES FOR THE RESIDENTIAL SIDE.

AND THAT'S 4.55 UNITS PER ACRE. WE'RE LOOKING FOR FRONT ENTRY.

NEXT SLIDE. THIS IS COME PARRISON OF SF5 TO VILACE AT LONG BRANCH AND OUR PROJECT WIN GATE MANNER.

YOU SEE THE UNITS PER ACRE IS LESS IN SF5.

MAX OF 8 AND SIMILAR TO LONG BRANCH ACROSS THE STREET IF YOU MEAN INCLUDED THE FLOOD PLAIN AS IN LONG BRANCH WE WOULD BE LESS.

Y WE WOULD IF WE FWOT 60 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY WE ENDS UP EQUALING THE LONG BRANCH DEPTH. THE DWELLING UNIT INCREASED AND THE REAR SET BECOME DOWN AT THIS TIME 10 FOOT MATCH IF THE 60

FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY WAS APPROVED. >> SCREEN PLAN? WIELD BE PUTTING 6 FOOT WOOD FENCE ALONG THE BOARDER TO THE EAST AND SOUTHEAST. ONE MAIN REASON WE INCLUDED THIS BUFFER ALONG THE BOUNDARY IS TO KEEP THE TREE LINE IN PLACE.

. AND WE WOULD WILL OFF SET THE FENCE TO KEEP THAT TREE LINE IF PLACE AS A BUFFER FOR NEIGHBORS.

LONG THE UPON FRONTAGE OF MILLER AND THE CROAK.

DECORATIVE FENCE WITH MASONRY COLUMNS.

REPRESENTATIVES FROM TUBULAR FENCE WE PUT IN.

I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE OCCURRENCE SOME OF THESE YOU HAVE SXEEN FOCUSSED ON AND SOME MAY BE NOT AS MUCH.

[00:55:04]

ACCESS. CONNOR DID A GOOD JOB OF GOING OVER THAT. WE HAVE AN ACCESS ISSUE.

IF WE CONSTRUCTED THIS THE. WAY WILOSE OF LONG BRANCH CONSTRUCTED. WITH THIS PROJECT WE WOULD BE ABLE TO CORRECT LONG BRANCH, SAVE, THERE IS 5 LARGE CREPE MYRTLES THAT ARE NOT TAKEN IN ACCOUNT WHP WE DESIGNED WILLOWS AND WIELD BE ABLE TO SAVE THOSE AND SHIFT THIS MEDIAN OPENING UP AND CORRECT OCCURRENCE ABOUT ACCESS.

IF APPROVED WE WILL BE WITHIN OUR CONSTRUCTION OF CORRECTING OCCURRENCE OF ACCESS ON THIS LAYOUT.

WE ARE GIVING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY DESIGNATION FOR MILL ARE ROAD FOR EXPANSION OR UTILITY IMPROVE AMS. WE TALKED ABOUT THIS LAST TIME BUT WE DID A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. A STUDY WOULD NEED TO BE DONE BUT DID A TRAFFIC COUNT WITH OUR ENGINEER AND THERE IS ABOUT 80 TRIPS OR FEW ARE DAILY FROM THIS.

AND IT IS UNLIKELY THAT THOSE IN LONG BRANCH WILL IMPACT THE OPERATIONS OF MILLER ROAD. BASED ON OUR TRAFFIC COUNT UPON ANALYSIS FROM THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER.

THIS IS MORE DETAILED THE RELOCATION.

ENGINEERING PLANS. WE SAY 4 TO 5 -- BRADFORD PEAR TREES AND TWO CREPE MYRTLES. THAT IS A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT TO MILLER ROAD IF WREE WERE ABLE TO SAVE THOECHLZ IN THE STAFF IT SAYS TAKEN IN CONSIDERATION IT IS ALLOW FOR INTEGRATION OF LAND USE AND ALTERNATIVE DEVELOP AM STANDARDS AS A RESULT IN A HIGHER QUALITY OF DEVELOPMENT. THIS AM PROSECUTE POSED ZONING INCORPORATES MEDIUM COME LOAF RESIDENTIAL R. INCREASED THE STANDARDS FOR THE RESIDENTIAL LOTS.

. WE ADDED THE COMMERCIAL.

THIS THE ACTUAL PD DOES INCORPORATE MULTIPLE USE AS MENTION IN THE. WE HAVE ALTERNATE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, WE ARE HOLDING OURSELVES TO THE CITY'S DEVELOPMENT STARNSD. CITIES DON'T HAVE CONTROL OVER MATERIAL REQUIREMENTOS BUILDERS ANYMORE.

PUTTING OUR P D TOGETHER WE ARE AGREEING TO MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS AND DEVELOP AM STANDARDS AND ENSURING QUALITY.

NEXT SLIDE. ON THE COMMERCIAL.

THESE OTHER USE WE CAN MOVE ON. ON THIS ONE.

I'M NOT SURE IF CONNOR WENT OVER THIS.

A CONCEPT PLAN OF SOMETHING THAT COULD FIT ON THE COMMERCIAL.

THIS IS NOT A DETAILED PLAN IT WOULD HAVE TO COME BECOME IN WITH A PLAN TO BE APPROVED AND GO THROUGH PUBLIC HEAR TO GET WHEN WE GET APPROVED ON THE SITE IT IS A PLAN SHOWING WHAT CAN FIT ON THE COMMERCIAL. IT IS NOT A 3 AWAY PIECE.

ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS. WE WILL BE WILL UPGRADING OUR GARAGE DOORS. .

AS EACH ONE WILL NEED ONE OR TWO OF THE FOLLOWING FEATURES.

WE'LL NOT JUST HAVE A FLAT, MET AT GARAGE DOOR THERE.

YOU SEE TO THE PRODUCT ON THE RIGHT.

TALK ABOUT THE SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT.

A COUPLE THINGS ARE MISSING FROM THE SLIDE CONNOR WENT OVER WITH YOU. NAIN MAIN THINGS MISSING ARE THE 40 FOOT. LOTS TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE THAT ARE 4800 SQUARE FOOT AND ALSO THE PIECE JUST TO THE EAST

[01:00:01]

OF THAT IS ON THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AS 7,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS. SO IF WE'RE DISCUSSING THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT. HALF OF THIS PROJECT IS HIGH INTENSITY 40 FOOT LOTS OR 7,000 SQUARE FOOT OF PLANNED HOMES.

THE BUILT APPROXIMATE ENVIRONMENT NOT IF NECESSARILY ALL ESTATE AND LARGE LOT ITS IS 50/50.

GO TO THE NEXT SLIDER. YOU SEE FROM THIS SLIDE, WE ARE -- BELIEVE THAT WE ARE MIRRORING TWO OUT OF THE 4 CORNERS AND CREATING AN INTERSECTION WHERE 3 OF THE 4 CORNERS MATCH AND ONE CLOSE LOW MATCHES.

TO THE NORTH OF US YOU HAVE A 40 ARE UPON FOOT WILL LOT IN HIGHER INTENSITY. SINGLE FAMILY FROM MILLENNIUMER ROAD TO THE SF-40. THAT IS AS I STATED THAT IS THE TOUR PLAN. DIRECT EVIDENCE IING NAYED FOR STHEVENLD SQUARE ARE FOOT LOTS. .

ACROSS THE THE STREET TO THE WEST THE COMMERCIAL TO COMMERCIAL LOTS TO SF40 AND 10 AND STICK FOOT.

LOOK AT OUR SITE, IT MIRRORS THOSE TWO CORNERS.

GOING TO COMMERCIAL TO 40 FOOT LOTS AND 60 FOOT LOTS SIMILAR TO THE. SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM.

AND GOES IN 40 F. SAME TRANSITIONAL ZONING WE ARE PROPOSAL SYSTEM SIRORS ON TWO CORN CUSTOMERS OF THIS PROJECT THERE ARE UNIQUE PROPERTIES TO THE EAST AND OF THE F. AND ALSO TO THE EAST OF THE 40 FOOV LOTS THAT WERE ANGIO PROVED LAST YEAR. IF YOU ARE LIKING AT ATFUL OF.

WHEN WE ORIGINAL LIE PROPOSED. I BELIEVE OUR NEW PLAN PROVIDES A MORE GRADUAL TRANSITION THAN THE OTHER CORNERS DO.

NEXT SLIDE. AGAIN AS I DISCUSSED IF YOU ARE LOOKING AT THIS, ABOUT HALF OF THE PROPERTY HALF OF THE BORDER OF THE PROPERTY IS HIGH INTENSITY OR 40 FOOT LOTS.

3 OUT OF 4 OF THE SUBDIVISIONS WE HAVE A LARKER BUILDING AREA SPECIAL LOT AREA. SO, WE BELIEVE THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT EXPLAINED EARLIER IS NOT INCLUSIVE OF THE WHOLE ENVIRONMENT. HOA MAINTENANCE, THESE BUFFERS ARE, THESE OPEN SPACE WERE INCLUDED FOR BUFFERS.

THEY'RE ALSO ACCESS POINTS. WE HAVE A 30 WERE THE FOOT BUFFER ALONG OUR EASTERN BOUNDARY AND YOU NEED ACCESS.

BOTH PROVIDE ACCESS. LOT 13 PROVIDES ACCESS TO THAT AND THE BUFFER BETWEEN LOT 22 AND THE PROPERTY THE SECOND POINT OF ACCESS TO LOT 23. BOTH OF THESE ARE EASILY ACCESSIBLE AND PROVIDE BUFFER TO KEEP THE TREE IN THE FENCE THERE PURKE A HOUSE AGAINST IT GIVES THE OWNER THE RIGHT TO REMOVE NABUFFER. BOTH LANDSCAPERS AND HOA TOUCH SEE THIS A LOT. OF MAINTAINING AREAS.

THEY ARE MORE IN NOT FOR A BUFFER TO KEEP THE UPON TREES AND PUT FENCE LINE WE CAN MAINTAIN THAN HAVING AN ACTIVE, ONLY SPACE TINT IS FOR BUFFER, KEEPING TREES AND SOMETHING WE

[01:05:04]

CAN MAINTAIN. TO THE REAR ENTRY ACCESS, THE SLIDE THAT IS SHOWN TO THE LEFT ON THE -- CONNOR'S UPON PRESENTATION AND THE STAFF REPORT, IT IS CORRECT BUT A DIFFERENT SITUATION. ETCH IF YOU WILL NOTICE THAT THE ALLEY IS BELOW THE RETAINING WALL.

UPON OPPOSITE OF WHEN WE ARE PRESENTING HERE.

WE WILL HAVE A 12-15 UPON FOOT WALL IN SOME AREAS ALONG THAT CREEK BED. IF THE ALLEY WAS IN A SITUATION SHOWN ON THIS PICTURE, YOU COULD NOT GET IN THE HOUSE.

HOUSE IS ON THE TOP OF THAT WALL.

THIS PICTURE SHOWING WHERING IF YOU HAD HOMES AND ALLEY AND THEN YOU RHODE THE ELEVATION GROUP. HOMES IN THE CROOK IN THIS EXAMPLE. IF YOU LOOK AT THE PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH. OUR RECALL WOODBRIDGE REPORT.

THERE ARE A LOT THAT BACK UP TO A KEEK.

POLAR RIDGE THEY STOPPED THE ALE WHERE THE KEEK IS.

ONE FOR REMEMBER VIEW. STATUTORY NOT THE AVENUEEF ENVIRONMENT. .

THERE IS E RANGE OF MOTION BARRIERS.

YOU HAVE TO BUILD A TWHAUL GOES BELOCALITY CREEK LINE.

ITS IN THE A PRACTICAL SOLUTION TO PUT AN ALLEY LOW BEARING ALLET TRASH TRUCKS WILL DRIVEWAY DOWN AND A RETRAINING WALL ALONG THE CREEK. IT IT IS A RECIPE FOR DISASTER.

IF YOU ARE SITTING ON THE LOTOS YOUR PORCH WITH AN OPEN FENCE YOU WOULD RATHER LOOK AT THE CREEK AT THE TRAIL.

ACCESS TO THE TRAIL POSSIBLE LOW IF YOUS CHOSE TO PUT STEPS BUT THIS IS MORE OF A VIEW CORRIDOR THE SAME TO THE SOUTH.

THEY DON'T HAVE A WILL WALL OR DON'T HAVE AN ALLEY ALONG THE BASKET PROJECT AND A WALL IN AM SOME PLACES.

ALSO THE NEIGHBORS. .

FIIT WAS A NEIGHBOR LOOKING IN ETCH AND LOOK PAST I WOULD LOOK AT SOMEBODY'S BACKYARD THAN AN ALLEY.

RATHER LOOKING AT TREE LINE, LANDSCAPE AND FENCES.

ALES TYPICALLY CUT OFF HALF OF YOUR BACKYARD ON PROJECTS.

TEMPERATURE IS MARKETABLE TOM HAVE A LARGER BACKYARD THAN A FRONT UPON YARD. PEOPLE LIKE SPACE TO PUT A PATIO AND DOG AND PLAY SET. NEXT SLIDE.

ALES, MAINTENANCE ISSUES. DOUBLES THE CONCRETE IN THE CITY TO MAINTAIN. MORE COST LOW.

I HAVE AN ALLEY. I KNOW I DON'T UPON GO PICK UPON MY LEAVES. IT TAKES ME 3 TO 4 TIMES TO GO BACK AND PICK UP LEAVES PEOPLE PAY LESS ATTENTION TO YOUR ALES.

NEIGHBORS WILL LOOK AND WE ARE ASKING TO PUT THEM ALONG THE CREEK AND TRAIL. CONCERNS WITH DRIVEWAY LENGTH THE PICTURE ABOVE IS NOT ACCOUNTING FOR A 25 FOOT SETBACK. MIDDLE PICTURE IS.

OF THAT'S A CHEVY TRUCK AND SUBURB AN.

UPON THEY ARE LESS THAP 20 FEET WE ARE GIVING 25 FOOT THERE IS WILL ROM FOR SOMEBODY TO MESS UP AND GET 3 FOOT AWAY FROM THEIR GARAGE DOOR AND NOT HIT THE SIDEWALK.

THIS PICTURES OF THE JAY SWING DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE 60 FOOT LOTS. WE HAVE GREAT PRODUCT FOR THAT.

AND WE INTRODUCE TODAY IN ROWLETT SXEFT HAVE IT IN SEVERAL PROJECT THERE IS AND WILL DO IT ON.

MAYOR VILLAGE. HIT BACK ON THE -- WE'RE WILLING

[01:10:02]

TO COMPLOY WITH THE 60 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY SECTION.

NEXT SLIGHT. ENTRY WAY CONSIDERATIONS.

ALEX POINTED OUT WE ARE NOT PEDESTRIAN MEETING THE REQUIREMENT FOR TWO ENTRY WAYS BUT AS HE SAID, THE TRAIL HEAD FEATURE FULL MILLS 10RDC. GIVES US A SENSE OF PLACE.

OF THE DIVISION FOR THE OF THE ROAD.

THE SETBACK WE'RE PROVIDING -- CONNOR CALLS THE 20 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUSH. FAILING TO MENTION THERE IS A 15 FOOT EASEMENT THERE FOR UTILITIES.

THAT WILL 20 UPON FOOTPRINT BUFFER IS REALLY 35 FOOT IN MOST PLACE WE HAVE A 20 FOOT BUFFER ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE 15 FOOT EASE AM. WE HAVE THAT OFFER OF MILLER.

NOT AS JUST RIBUFFER. THIS IS THE TRAIL HEAD THAT WE WOULD PROSECUTE POSING ON MILLER ROAD.

YOU SEE THIS AND DRIVING EAST. YOU SEE THIS UP ON THE HILL A TRAIL HEAD AND WOULD BE NOTED ONLY AN ENTER TO THE SUBDIVISION AND TO ROWLETT. WE BELIEVE IT WOULD BE EXCITING AND A GREAT ADOIGZ THIS CORNER. .

GIVE A LOT OF BEAUTY TO IT. BUFFER FROM MILL ARE ROAD SHOWN MORE DETAIL. WE'RE GIVINGA LAND SKAIF SCAPE BUFFER. THERE SAY 15 FOOT UTILITY EASEMENT IN GREEN AND A 25 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER.

WE ARE NOT 20 FOOT OFF THE BACK OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WE ARE AT STREET OF MILL ARE ROAD. WE ARE ACTUALLY FROM THE PAVEMENT WE ARE 50 FOOT. OFF THE PAVEMENT.

WANTED CLARIFY THAT. NEXT SLIDE.

I TALKED ABOUT THIS EARLIER, ONE OF THE COMMENTS IN THE STAFF REPORT OUR 15 FOOT REAR SETBACK WOULD FLULT PROPOEDZ RESIDENTS BACKING ON LARGER ESTATE LIKE LOTS TO THE EASTMENT.

OF OUR LOTS THE BACK OVER TO THE EAST, LOTS 2- 12 WE HAVE A 10 ON 15 FOOT REAR SETBACK. AND A FIRST FOOT BUFFER AND THAT HOUSE IS ANOTHER 40 TO 50 FEET OFF THAT BUFFER.

OF 2 AND 3 OTHER UPON ONLY WATTS NAAFFECT THAT.

FROM THE SOITH EAST WE DON'T HAVE.

THE LOSS THE REAR SETBACK AFFECTS ONE HOME.

THAT ONE HOME HAS A 30 FOOT BUFFER BEHIND THAP LOT. UPON 15 FOOT REAR SETBACK DON'T BELIEVE IT WILL AFFECT ANY EXISTING HOMEOWNERS YOU SEE THE 30 FOOT BUFFER.

BUFFERS ARE IF THE -- PROPERTY OWNERS TO THE SOUTHEAST.

YOU SEE THERE IS IN THE A LOT BACKING UP TO THAT.

THE REAR SETBACK IS NOT GOING TO AFFECT ANYTHING.

TO THE SOUTH A 50 FOOT SPACE WHERE THE RETENTION POND WILL BE. SUSTAINABILITY OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS. CONCERN THANKSGIVING DEVELOPMENT AM DOES NOT LEND TO SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOODS SHOULD PROVIDE WITH MENTAL AND PHYSICAL SENSE OF ACCOMPLICE ASIDE FROM THE TRAIL HEAD THIS SDPROEFL NOT OFFER SPACE OF RECOGNITION THE POSSIBILITY OF COMMUNAL UPON RIGHT OF CONDITION AND BELONGING. THIS PLACE TYPE IN THE COMMON PLAN DOES TALK ABOUT THE MENTAL AND PHYSICAL PLACE AND THE MIX OF HOUSING TYPES. WE INCORPORATE THEM.

LANDSCAPING THAT IS PASSIVE AND ACTIVE.

A TRAIL HEAD AND THOUSAND FOOT OF TRAIL AND MIXED THE 3 LOT DENSITIES AND HAVE A COMMUNITY GUARD WEB A TRAIL CONNECTING THE

[01:15:05]

COMMUNITY EAST TO WEST. WE BELIEVE WE DESIGNED A COMMUNITY THAP GIVES YOU A SENSE OF PLACE.

THAT'S THE NEIGHBORHOOD WITH THE TRAIL HEAD AND WHERE THE TRAIL WILL STARTS. OF FOITOS OF THE BUFFER.

A GAZEBO PLANNED. GIVING ACT AND I HAVE PASSIVE AND A SENSE OF PLACE. THE TRAIL IF.

NEXT SLIDE. OUR MIX OF HOUSING TYPES.

LOW DENSITY TO MEDIUM. THE CREEK IS MESS AND HE DIRTY.

ONE OF THE VIRTUSE AND ELEMENTS OF OF THIS WE WILL CLEAN IT SITE UP. PICTURES OF THE CROAK BED.

HARDSHIPS IS WE WENT OVER THESE LAST TIME, THIS PROJECT IS VERY, VERY EXPENSIVE TO BUILD. WE HAD A LOT OF CITIZENS AND PROPOSING WE DO TWHENLTD SQUARE FOOT LOTS.

WE HAVE GONE THROUGH LAYOUTS AND PROVIDE LAYOUTS FROM THE NEIGHBORS. AND AM THEY HAVE THE SAME AMOUNT PAVING AND SUE AND WATER. THE COSTS ARE THE SAME FOR 25 HUH SQUARE FOOT LOT THIS IS PROJECT NEEDS AN ARIAL SEWER CROSSING OR CROSS MILLER ROAD. WE WILL HAVE LARGE RETAINING WALLS ALONG THE CREEK. WLCHL THIS WAS.

IN THE 20,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT DESIGNS. PROPERTY WILL HAVE TO BE BROUGHT OUT OF THE FLOOD PLANE THAT WILL INCLUDE RETAINING WALLS. WE TALK ABOUT THEED TOPOGRAPHY AND IT JUST OF, THE PROPERTY IS NOT DEVELOPABLE FOR SF-40.

TELL AND I FELT SOME POINT TELL TURN INTO COMMERCIAL OR WERE AND HIGH INTENSITY USE. IT DOES NOT SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF SF-40. I'M WITH THE SLIDES TO SHOW YOU REMINDS YOU WE WENT THE TRANSITION WE HAVE GONE THROUGH WILL WILL THE STAFF REPORT ENDS INSTEAD OF LOT DIMENSIONS AND ORIENTATION. .

IN CONCLUSION APPEARS THE APPLICANT HAS NOT MADE AN EFFORT TO REALIZE THE PROBLEMS INSTEAD GOVERNED BY BUSINESS MODEL FOR LET COUNT. THIS IS A TELLING PICTURE THAT IT IS NOT THE CASE. IF WE WERE DOING A PRESCRIBED LOT COUNT WE WOULD HAVE GONE AWAY WITH 88 LOT COUNT WE BELIEVE THAT WAS A GREAT PROJECT.

WE BELIEVE THAT THE SECOND TIME THAT'S WHEN WE ARE DOING ACROSS THE STREET AND WHAT IS IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT.

WE ARE BACK WITH A PLAN IT WE BELIEVE DOES SATISFY -- THIS OF AREA AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT WITH A LOW ARE LOT COUNT IT IS NOT ABOUT GETTING 88 LOTS AND RUNNING IT THROUGH.

WE ARE WILLING TO COMPROMISE AND COME SDPOUN WILLING TO BUILD A NICE IF SUBDIVISION AND CONTINUE WHEN WE HAVE DONE IN THE CITY OF ROWLETT. NEXT SLIDE.

THIS IS MY LAST SLIDE I WANTED TO END ON THIS OF THE BUILT VIERNLT. SHOWING HOW WE ARE MIRRORING TWO OF THE ALREADY ESTABLISHED INTERSECTIONS IN THIS AT THIS -- CORE DORSE OF THIS INTERSECTION. I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.

I DO ASK IF YOU GO BACK TO THE OTHER SCLOO PID SLIDE IN CASE THERE ARE QUESTIONS. I ALSO ASK FOR TIME FOR TO ADDRESS CITIZEN COMMENTS OR STAFF COMMENTS AFTER MY

[01:20:03]

PERSONALITIATION I HAVE BEEN TAKEN OFF SCREEN.

I BELIEVE CITIZEN COMMENTS ARE DIRECTED DIRECTLY TO THE COMMISSION. AM I RIGHT ABOUT THAT? YOU ARE MOUED BUT WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAY SOMETHING? YES, MA'AM, I WOULD. IF OR -- ARE YOU ALLOWING US TIME FOR QUESTIONS TO STAFF AND THE DEVELOPER BEFORE WE OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. IF Y'ALL WOULD LIKE A CHANCE TO VISIT WITH THEM, YES, THAT IS FINE.

DOES ANYBODY THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR THE DEVELOPER? I GOT CLARE IFKDZ ON THE QUESTION. IT IS A PUBLIC HEARING WE ARE TALKING TO CITIZENS IT IS OPEN HEARING.

PART OF THE PUBLIC IF YOU CLOSE THE HEARING I CAN'T TALK IF YOU ALLOW ME TIME PRIOR TO YOU CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING I BELIEVE IT IS OPEN FOR ME TO ADDRESS QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS.

WOULD YOU WEIGH IN ON THAT FOR ME, MA'AM.

IT IS THE PREROGATIVE OF THE P AND Z TO FOLLOW THIS COURSE SHOULD THEY PRIOR TO CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING.

>> OKAY. UPON ANYBODY HAVE A COMMENT ON THAT ARE Y'ALL OKAY ALLOWING THE PUBLIC TO ASK QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. ANYBODY OPPOSED TO THAT? JUST TO CLARIFY, THE PUBLIC CANNOT ASK QUESTIONS OF I GUESS ADAM ASKED TO RESPOND TO COMMENTS POSED RECEIVING

COMMENTARY FROM THE. >> I SEE

>> CORRECT. >> I IF ANYTHING IS SAID TO US OR IF THEY ASK AT THE END I WOULD LIKE TO 71ED CONVERSATIONS

GOING ON. >> DMN SEPTEMBER AND IT WAS SIMILAR TO THE FWHON 2019. SEPTEMBER OF 2019.

NO 2020. YEA.

DURING THE PANDEMIC? YES , SIR.

THE COUNCIL WERE SIMILAR TO THE ACCOUNTS THAT WERE TAKEN FOR THE OF PROPERTY ACROSS THE STREET IN 2019.

THEY TOOK THAT INTO AFFECT. THAT WAS A CONCERNED COMMENT.

YES , SIR. I HAVE ONE IF YOU DON'T MIND A COMMENT. WHY CAN I CLARIFY THAT.

WHAT WAS DONE BY THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER WAS NOT A TRAFFIC COUNT. I NEED TO CLARIFY THAT.

IT WAS AN ASSESSMENT OF OUR HOW MANY TRIPS A TRIP GENERATION.

THE TRAFFIC THAT WAS OF -- THAT IT WAS COMPARED TO OR DEALT WITH WAS THE CITY'S TRAFFIC STUDY IN 2018 OR 19.

WE LOOKED AT THE CITY'S TRAFFIC STUDY AND COUNTS WE TOOK A TRIP GENERATION TO SEE HOW MANY WOULD COME OUT AND AD TO THE CURRENT TRAFFIC. I'M SORRY.

I CONFUSED WITH ANOTHER PROJEC WE DID.

CITY HAD A TRAFFIC REPORT DONE. WE TOOK A TRAFFIC COUNT, WHICH IS JUST A TRIP GENERATION COUNT? CORRECT? JEFF? AND COMPARED IT TO WHAT THE

CITY'S TRAFFIC COUNTS WERE. >> YES.

[01:25:04]

OKAY. THEM THING IS VERY CONFUSING.

MUCH LIKE COMPARING THIS DEVELOP AM TO THE ONE ACROSS THE STREET THAT YOU ARE DOING NOW, WHICH A LOT OF US WERE NOT VERY FAVORABLE FOR. WE ARE COMPARING IT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACROSS ROWLETT ROAD, WHICH IS LOT SIZE COMPARABLE TO WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.

THAT NEIGHBORHOOD ALSO HAS ALLEYS YOU ARE ASKING NOT TO

HAVE. >> YES , SIR.

>> YOU THAN IS NOT APPLES TO APPLES, EITHER.

OOVENLG COMMISSIONERS OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE DEVELOPER OR FOR STAFF? NOT BROUGHT NOW.

OKAY. IF I CAN JUST CLARIFY TO MAKE SURE NOW WE DO HAVE SEVERAL CITIZENS AND RESIDENT WHO IS WANT TO HAVE THEIR COMMENTS HEARD AND AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. AGAIN, YOU KNOW, WHEN WE TALK ABOUT ALLOWING THE APPLICANT TO PROVIDE COMMENTS THAT IS FOR CLARIFICATION FOR YOURSELF YOU CAN SEEK CLARIFICATION OF BUT TO PROVIDE FOR THE APPLICANT TO PROVIDE A REBUTTAL TO THE RESIDENTS CALLING IN IS DIFFERENTFUL I'M REFERRING TO GIVING AN OPPORTUNITY SHOE NEED TO SEEK CLARIFICATION TO THE APPLICANT PRIOR TO CLOSING OF PUBLIC HEARING.

>> DO YOU UNDERSTAND? I'M JOHN.

YES, MA'AM. IF SOMETHING COMING UP THAT YOU LIKE. ARE YOU SAYING IF THE.

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEEKS CLARIFICATION.

I SEE. >>

>> YES, MA'AM. WE HAVE CALLERS ON THE LINE FIRST WE'LL GO OVER HOUSEKEEPING ISSUES.

FOR THE CALLERS ON THE LIGHTWEIGHT MUTE ALL ELECTRONICS IN THE BACKGROUND. CALLERS RECOGNIZED BY THE LAST 4 DIGITS OF PHONE NUMBER OR -- THEIR NAME DESIGNATION.

UPON ONCE RECOGNIZED YOU WILL BE GIVEN 3 MINUTES TO SPEAK AFTER PROVIDING NAME AND ADDRESS. SOUND MUTED AT THE END OF YOUR TIME IF YOU SUBMIT YOUR COMMENTS VIA E MAIL THEY WILL BE READ IN IT WILL NOT BE NECESSARY TO MAKE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS VIA PHONE.

CALLERS WHEN YOU ARE RECOGNIZED YOU WILL RECEIVE A MESSAGE ASKING TO YOU MUTE, UNMUTE PRESSING STAR 6.

. OUR FIRST CALL ER 4022.

ARE YOU WANT TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? NEXT CALL ARE 9682. WOULD YOU LIKE TO ADDRESS THIS ITEM? PRESS STAR 6 TO UNMUTE.

YES I'M TROY CORMAN. I'M REPRESENTING KATHY JEROME THE PROPERTY OWNER OF MILL ARE ROAD AND WANTED TO GET OFF A FEW POINTS HER FAMILY OWNED PROPERTY SINCE THE UPON 70S AND SO THEY TRIED TO SELL AT THIS TIME LAST 20 YEARS SPECIAL HAVE NOT HAD LUCK. PART OF THE PROBLEM IS THE EXTREME TERRAIN CHANGES ON THE PROPERTY AND ALSO THE CREEK THAT GOES THROUGH IT. SO -- MOST REASONABLE WE HAD INQUIRES FROM APARTMENT DEVELOPERS, INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPERS AND SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPERS THATMENT US TO DO FOR

[01:30:04]

RENT SINGLE FAMILY. SO -- GOOD THING IS YOU KNOW THEY ARE DOING FOR SALE PRODUCT ONLY.

TELL BE ONLY FOR SALE. AND I GUESS YOU KNOW EARLIER.

THE MAIN THING IS SKORBURGS WORKED HARD ON THIS AND SO HAVE CITY STAFF AND COME TO AN AGREEMENT.

A LOT OF WORK DONE BY A LOT OF PEOPLE.

REALLY -- THE FACT THAT THE LOT SIZES INCREASES.

THEY TROY TOED ACCOMMODATE THE NEIGHBORS THEY ARE NOT AS IMPACTED AS THEY WERE AND DOWN FROM 175 TOWN HOME LOTS AND WE ARE AT A THIRD OF THAT CURRENTLY NOW.

SO00 AUTOFACT THAT YOU KNOW THEY MADE THE CHANGES TRYING TO MAKE THE PROJECT WORK FOR THE CITY THE SKORBURG WORKED IN THE CITY ON MULTIPLE OTHER PROJECTS THAT ARE SUCCESSFUL AND AGREED TO DOT COMMERCIAL SIDE WHICH IS NOT AN EASY THING TO ACCOMMODATE SINCE NOW THERE IS NOT DEMAND FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOP AM IN TERMS OF OFFICE AND RETAIL. WITH THOSE SAID AND KATHY -- YOU KNOW I GUESS HER CONCERN WAS THE FACT THAT THEY APPROVED THE -- THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH ON ROULETTE AND MILL ARE ROAD.

FEELS HER PROPERTY IS SIMILAR. SHE DOESN'T UNDERSTAND WHY IT IS NOT FAIR YOU DOT SMALL ARE DEVELOP AM THERE.

SHE WOULD LIKE TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE PROJECT.

JR SKOALA. I'M JR SKOALA 3803 HIDDEN VALIN ROWLETT. FIRST I MUST POINT OUT THE COMMUNITY WAS ABLE TO PREPARE FOR THE PROPOSAL POSTED THE WEBSITE. AND THE DEVELOPER PROMISE ANDS ON THE FLY PROPOSAL MODIFICATIONS SHOULD BEING INEMELIGIBLE FOR CONSIDERATION. IMPORTANT PURPOSE OF A PLAN IS TO ALLOW RESIDENCE DENTS AND INVESTORS TO PLAN FOR THE FUTURE AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSIDERED WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP PROVIDES A SENSE OF STABLTH REQUIRED FOR INVESTMENT.

THIS IS A REASON YET STATE OF TEXAS REQUIRE THE MUNICIPALITIES THAT HAVE A PLAN TO FOLLOW IT. ZONING AGAINST THE PLAN AND LAND USE MAP IS ILLEGAL TEMPERATURE ROBS RESIDENTS OF THE FUTURES THEY INVEST IN THE. THE FUTURES THEY GRAND JURY ED AND COMMITTED TO BY VOTING FOR THE DOCUMENTS.

MY WIFE AND I INVEST IN THE ROWLETT MAKING OUR HOME ENEMY HIDDEN VALLEY. HAD WE KNOWN THE CITY WOULD CONSIDER SPOT ZONE TO ALLOW BARELY LARGE ARE THAN 1080 ARE LOTS AND 36 FOOT TALL TO 14 FOOT TALL EMBANKMENT ON 2-1/2 WILL STORE BELLEDINGS. WREE WOULD HAVE LOOKED ELSEWHERE PD TINLDZED IMPROVED TO IMPROVED DEVELOP AM STANDARDSES.

WHERE IN THE PROPOSAL DO WE SEE ANYTHING RESEMBLE HIGHER QUALITY DEVELOPMENT. I SEE LABORS AND VARIANCE REQUESTS AND NO SERIOUS RATIONAL YET CODES CANNOT BE COMPLIED WITH THE WAIVERS DUE TO CONFLICTS THAT ARRIVE FROM OTHER WAIVERS THEY ARE REQUESTING IT IS LIKE THE MOVING INCEPTION BUT WITH WAIVERS. THEY'RE PROSECUTE POSING 1080 ARE LOTS THEY ADDED SLIGHTLY LARGE ARE LOTS MRS. THOMPSON WILL HAVE 12 NEW NEIGHBORS INSTEAD OF 16.

SKORBURG WILL TELL THANK YOU IS A MATCH.

THE MAJOR OF THE ACREAGE SURROUNDING THIS PROPOSAL OF

[01:35:02]

CONSIDERABLY LARGER LOT SIZES THINK THAT ANYTHING PROPOSE.

WHAT THEY WILL HOPE YOU DON'T NOTICE IS THE LAND USE MAP IS A MATCH. IF SKORBURG WISHES TO BUILD IN ROWLETT THAT I WILL NEED TO OFFER A PRODUCT THAT ALIGNS WITH THE CURRENT ZONING. THANK YOU.

NEXT CALL ARE LAURA SKOALA DO YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THIS ITEM.

STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. LAURA SKOALA, 3803 HIDDEN VALLEY CIRCLE. MY HOME IS WITHIN 200 FEET I SPOKE AT PLAN NOTHING JUNE WHEN THIS DEVELOPER CAME TO THE COMMITTEE WITH A SIMILAR APPLICATION.

I WAS PREPARED HIGHLIGHT MY CONCERNS AND ADVOCATE AGAINST THE MODIFICATION IN OCTOBEREEN THOUGH IT WAS REMOVE FROM THE AGENDA THE LAST MINUTE MY MESSAGE IS THE SAME AS IN JUNE AS MY HUSBAND'S SPOKE A MINUTE. IT IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE EXISTING ZONING REQUIREMENT AND SHOULD NOT ISSUE ALLOWED MOVE FORWARD THE MODIFICATIONS MADE TO ACCOMMODATE US AS NEIGHBOR SYSTEM NOT ADDRESSING ANY OF THE ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH ACTUAL VARIATIONS AND DEVIATIONS FROM THE ZONING REQUIREMENTS THAT 6 FOOT FENCE AND NOT CHOPPING DOWN TREE SYSTEM IRRELEVANT IF THE LAND WAS DEVELOPED IN COMPLIANCE TO THE CURRENT ZONING THE UPON TRANSITIONS ARE MISLEADING. UNIQUE PROPERTIES TO THE EAST IS THE ADJACENT PROPERTY ARE A MERE FEW FEET FROM THAT TRANSITION TO MY HOME. THAT IS NOT A ZONING TRANSITION FROM A STATE RESIDENTIAL TO SUBSF-TIME FORGIVE ME BUT WHAT WAS REPRESENTED BY THE DEVELOPER AS A TRAIL IS A GLORIFIED SIDEWALK. I KNOW THE ROWLETT TRIS AND I FREAK WENT THE MOUNTAIN BIKING TRAILS AND LOVE THEM.

THIS IS NEITHER OF THOSE. THIS REZONING WILL AFFECT EVERY NEIGHBOR WE HAVE IN THE AREA AND THE REZONING AND DEVELOPMENT WOULD SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT SCHOOLS.

TRAFFIC, NOISE AND VALUE OF HOMES AND WE DID REACH OUT TO OUR NEIGHBORS AND WE GOT AN OUT BOORING OF FRUSTRATION.

WE ARE ASKING THAT PLANNING AND ZONING AND COUNCIL ABSOLUTELY DENY THIS ASK REQUEST THE TRAFFIC CONGESTION IS TO NAME A FEW HIGHLIGHTED EARLIER WHCHL WE PURCHASED OUR HOME WE RESEARCHED THE AREA AND ABSOLUTELY THRILLED WITH THE DETAILED PLANNING.

THE PLAN ACCOUNTED FOR FUTURE VACANT LAND USAGE WATER MOVEMENT AND PROSECUTION OF WILDLIFE AND TREES AND FELT SECURE IN THE VALUE OF OUR HOME AND THE VICTIM IN THE CITY.

OTHER DEVELOPMENT PRESENTED TONIGHT ARE JUST BECAUSE THEY REPRESENTED AS SOLD AND COMPLIMENTARY IS KWHAT DEVELOP THIS DOES NOT GIVE WARRANT TYPESET IS IRRELEVANT AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF THIS PROPOSAL.

IT IS UNACCEPTABLE. WE ARE NOT AGAINST DEVELOPING IT WE ARE MERELY ADD VO IS DEVELOPED IN ACCEPTANCE WITH THE PLAN. THAT'S ALL THE CAL EVERY WE HAVE. WE'LL TURN IT OVER TO SUZANNE FOR SUBMITTED COMMENTS. JEFF LOT, 3801 HIDDEN VALLEY CIRCLE ROULETTE. HERE WE GO AGAINFUL HOME ORDINANCE DEFENDS THE LOOK AND FEEL OF PERMANENT AND THE VALUE DUE TO A MAJOR ZONING CHANGE A DEVELOPERMENTS OUR CITY TO APPROVE A ZONING CHANGE FROM SF40 TO SF-5.

BYPASSES SF20, 10, 9, 8 AND 7. TO GET TO AN SF5 GOING FROM THE LARGEST SINGLE FAMILY ZONE SF40 TO THE SMALLEST SF5.

MAKING THIS VERY SIGNIFICANT ZONING CHANGE THIS AREA WAS ZONED SF40 TO CREATE A SMALL FEEL TO CHANGE IT NOW TO SF5 WOULD DEPRIVE OCCURRENCE ON WILLIAMS WAY AND HIDDEN VALTHE LOOK AND FEEL AND VALUE OF PROPERTIES IS THE DEVELOPER GOING TO COMPENSATE THE HOMEOWNERS FOR LOSSES. TWO

[01:40:02]

PROPERTY BUNKHAM MOST AFFECTED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT ARE 380 SCOMBON 3 HIDDEN VALLEY ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF 3803 HIDDEN VALLEY. STREET RUNS UP THE PROPERTY LINE AS WELL AS THE SOUTH SIDE OF 3801.

POND AND SIDEWALK IS ON MY PERMANENT LINE I WAS UNDER IMPRESSION AN EASEMENT WAS REQUIRED IS THAT NOT THE CASE.

WHO WANTED A DETENTION POND BUTTED UP THE PROPERTY LINE WE COULD HOLD SCOMBAURT CREATE MOSQUITO INFESTATION.

WOULD YOU WANT THAT AT YOUR BACKYARD.

IN ADDITION TO THE ISSUES THAT AFFECT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD OTHER FACTORS NEED TO BE CONSIDERED. 1.

RACK. THE DEVELOPMENT THE DEVELOPER IS BUILDING ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MILLER WILL ALLOW RESIDENCE DENTS TO ONLY TURN RIGHT, WEST ON MILL ARE.

GOING EAST TO 190 THEY WILL DO USHG TURNS WEST OF ROWLETT TO HEAD TOWARD FWHIENT. YOU ARE NOW CONSIDERING THE TURN RIGHT AND WEST WILL HAVE TO DO A U TURN.

TRAFFIC AT ROWLETT AND MILL ARE AT RUSH HOUR IS A NAY MAYOR IMAGINE THE CHAOS THIS WILL CREATE IN THE MORNING AND EVENING RUSH HOUR. FLOODING.

RESIDENCE DENTSOS BRANCH CREEK LOWING PERMANENT TO THE CREEK DRAIN THANKING DEVELOPMENT ALONG WITH THE OTHER NORTH OF MILLER WILL INCREASE THE WATER FLOW. PROSECUTE POSE THE FIRST BILL MRRNS PROPOSAL AND THEY GET PERMISSION TO CHANGE THE ZONING FORMAT THE END RESULT IS NOT REQUIRED TO MATCH THE PROPOSAL.

DEVELOPER CAN ASK FOR EXCEPTIONS AND MAKE MULTIPLE XHAFRJS CAUTION THE DEVELOPMENT TO LOOK DIFFERENT THAN THE PLAN.

AN EXAMPLE IS PROPOSED DETENTION POND MAY NOT BE INCLUDED IN THE FINAL BUILD. TIME'S UP.

COMMENT? I LIVE WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL TO REZONE THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ROWLETT AND MILLER THE SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY IS IT IT IS NOT CONFORM TO THE PLAN. THE PACKET INCLUDES A DRAFT ORDINANCE TO ALLOW THIS USE AND IS NOT ON THE AGENDA WOULD BE IMPROPER. THE COMMISSION AND DELIBERATIONS SHOULD ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS.

ONE WILL THE CITIZENS BENEFIT FROM A DEVELOP THAT AM DOES NOT COMPLOY WITH THE COMP PLAN. IF THE COMMISSION DEEM ITS SHOULD BE AMENDED WHILE NOT ON THE AGENDA WHY WOULD YOU DO THIS? PLANS THAT NEED CORRECTING. WHY DID COUNCIL NOT PICK UP ON THE ERROR AND REQUIRE THE PLANTORY CORRECT IT BEFORE ADOPTED? HAS THERE BEEN A CHANGE IN THE NEEDS OF THE CITIZENS? WHAT IS IT? WHY SHOULD THEY CONSIDER A PLAN THAT HAS SO MANY DEFICIENCY.

DOES THE CITY WANT ANOTHER STATION REQUIRED BECAUSE THE DEVELOPER'S PLAN DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE COMP PLAN.

DOES THE CITY WANT TO IMPOSE ON MOTORISTS THAT EXACERBATES A TRAFFIC PROBLEM ON ROWLETT AND MILLER REQUIRING THOSE LEAVING FROM THE WESTERN STREET TO U TURN TO MILLER WEST BOUNDS.

DOES THE CITY WANT TO INCREASE THE TAX RATE:THAT WILL HAVE A LORE ASSESSED EVALUATION? I EMMRER THE CITY TO CONFORM TO STATE LAW AND CONDUCT A HEARING. TO REJECT THIS DEVELOP AM BECAUSE IT DOES NOT COMPLOY WITH THE COMP PLAN AND BENEFITS THE DEVELOPER. DON'T RUN OVER THE CITIZEN IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND APPROVE THIS DEVELOPMENT.

AS WAS DONE TO MRS. GARDENER A RESIDENT LIVES TO THE EAST OF THE VILACE. SHE HAS HOMEOS MANY LOTS WITHIN 15 FEET OF HER PROPERTY LINE HER LIFE SHE WILL HAVE NEIGHBORS PEERING DOWN ON HER PERMANENT. DON'T UPON BASKETBALLED THE COMP PLAN AND DO SOMETHING SIMILAR TO US.

OKAY. NEXT COMMENT.

GALE: 3802 HIDDEN VALLEY CIRCLE.

I LIVE WITHIN 500 FEET AND OPPOSED.

IT MIGHT LOOK PERSONALITIABLE IN THE DAYS BEFORE IT OPENS I

[01:45:01]

BELIEVE CRAMMING THE DENSITY OF PEOPLE, VEHICLES, BUILDING ON THE SMALL LOTS PROSECUTE POEDZ WILL BE AN EYE SORE THIS WILL FACE ROWLETT ROAD THROUGH ROWLETT THAT RESIDENCE DENTS AND VISITORSVILLE TO VIEW. KEEP IN MIND THE DEVELOPER GIVING SIMULTANEOUS IN THE NAME OF VILLA OR MANNER DOES NOT MAKE TEMPERATURE I BELIEVE TELL TURN TO A NEIGHBORHOOD NOT IN KEEPING WITH THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS.

THE TRAFFIC ISSUES THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BRIDGE BENEFIT NO CITIZEN OF ROWLETT. THE REASON A DWERPMENTES TO NUT A PROJECT IS NOT TO BENEFIT LIFESTYLE OF ROWLETT AND CITIZEN BUTT DEVELOPER ALONE. IF THE DEVELOPER WERE INTERESTED WITH THE CITY THEY WILL COMP PLY WITH THE PLAN.

COMP PLAN EXISTS FOR A REASON. I REQUEST THE PLANS FOR THIS DEVELOP AM DENIED AND I'M NOT ENCOURAGED OR COMFORTED WITH THE DEVELOPER SAYING TRUST US YOU WILL LIKE IT.

CHAIR AND MINUTES OF THE COMMISSION I'M DINS O RILE I WE LIVE AT 3310 HIDDEN VALLEY. WE RECEIVED A 500 FOOT NOTICE EFFICIENT CHANGE. WE FEEL THE DEVELOPMENT IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING AM RIDGE AREA AND THE PLAN. NUMBER EVER WAIVER SYSTEM SIGNIFICANT. THOSE MOST CONCERNING OTHER STREET, RIGHT-OF-WAY, LOT SIZES AND SET BHAKS.

HALF OF THE LOTS ARE SMALL BELOW THE ASKED ZONING.

MOST HAVE SIDE OFF SETS THE LOTS WILL CREATE SMALL YARDS INCONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND ROWLETT'S PLAN.

THE STREET IS NARROW. THIS IS CRIST CALL.

THIS MAY HAVE SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE PLAN.

THE NUMBER IN THE FRONT UPON ENTRY TUNNEL VISION WHEN LOOKING DOWN THE STREET. COMMON SENSE TELLS UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES THE DENSITY WILL INCREASE RUN OFF IN LONG BRANCH.

THIS PROPOSAL COMBINED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE COMPLETED APARTMENTS TO THE NORTH WILL INCREASE THE RUN OFF IN THE CREEK THE CURRENT PROPERTY EROSION ISSUE DOWN STREAM.

GIVEN LOCATION WE ANTICIPATE AN INCREASE OF TRAFFIC AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE ROADS. U TURNS ARE AN ISSUE ON MILLER A NO YOU TURN ON SKYLINE. PROPOSAL IS FOR 58 HOMES EAST OF THE CREEK. THIS IS LESS THAN THE NUMBER EARLIER WE BELIEVE THIS IS TOO MANY THAN THE NUMBER FOR THE PERMANENT AND UNACCEPTABLE VMENT WE BELIEVE THE HIGHER QUALITY DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTED ON THE SITE.

CONSISTENT WITH THE AREA AND ROWLETT'S PLAN AND BE FEASIBLE.

POSSIBLY SF20. WE'RE POSTED REZONING I HAVE SPOKEN TO OR CONTACTED BY ELECTRONIC MEANS 36 RESIDENTS IN THE AREA. TWO INDIFFERENT TO THE PROPOSAL.

3 I'M NOT SURE OF THEIR POSITION AND THEREIN OR 86% OPPOSED THE REZONING STHK FOR YOUR ATTENTION ON THIS MATTER.

I WANT TO VOICE STRONG OPPOSITION TO THE PROJECT.

HOW MANY TIMERS MUST THE CITY REQUEST DENIAL OF THE DEVELOP.

HOW MANY ZERO LOT HOMES IS THE CITY GOING TO PROGRAM.

THIS DEVELOPER COME BACK TO GET IT APPROVED WE ARE NOT GOING TO GO AWAY. THE LOSS OF PROPERTY AND NATURAL WILDLIFE AND HABITAT AT AN UNPRECEDENTED RATE THE EROSION

[01:50:03]

WHICH RUN SCOTT DRIVE AND WING'S WAY CAUSED THE LOSS OF PROPERTY AND LOSS AND DAMAGE TO TREES AND PLANT LIVE HERE FOR GENERATIONS.

EVERY ADDITION OF COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL PERMANENT THE CITY HAVE APPROVES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROAD AND MILLER INCREASES THE WATER VOLUME AND RATE OF FLOW.

I'M SURE YOU UNDERSTANDS WITH THE INCREASE OF WATER AND WILL FLOW YOU HAVE AN INCREASED RATE OF UNREPAIRABLE DAMAGE DONE ALONG THE CREEK IN ATHLETE YEARS WE LIVEOD SCOTT DRIVE WE SEEN THE ADDITION OF TWO GAS STATIONS AND A FUNERAL HOME AND THE RESIDENCE DENTS IN A NEW DEVELOPMENT ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MILL AND ROWLETT ROAD. IT CAUSED DAMAGE TO THE WATER DIVERT IN THE IT FOR RESPECTID GROW OF THE CITY.

AT THE TIME THE CITY STEPPED UP AND PUT AVEIANS BEHIND THE FIRST FEW HOMEOS SCOTT DRIVE EAST OF ROWLETT AND CLEANED OUT THE FALLEN TREES, BRUSH AND TRASH ACOUPE LIT IN THE THE CREEK ALLOWED FOR THE SMOOTHER FLOW OF WATER IN THE LAKE THIS WORKED BUT NO LONGER WORKING. I FEEL THE CITY SHOULD TAKE CARE OF CITIZENS BY SLOWING THE DAMAGE AND NOT ADDING TO T.

DON'T ALLOW THIS LAND TO BE COVERED BY CONCRETE.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. JOHN SHOEMAKER.

POLICE HAVE THIS ALL RIGHT READ TO PLAN AND ZONING TO CONSIDER THEORY CHANG OF ZONING I'M JOHN SHOEMAKE ARE.

WE BUILT OUR MOBILE HOME IN 1984.

MY WIFE AND I ARE OPPOSED TO THE DEVELOPMENT FOR ALL OF THE REASONS STATED BY OTHERS. ROWLETT AND THE YOUR DON'T NEED DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL HOUSES ON POSTAGE STAMP LOTS BUILT AT THIS MAJOR INTERSECTION WHICH IS A GATEWAY TO OR CITY.

TELL LESSEN THE VALUE AND DESIRABILITY OF THE HOMES THE NORTHEAST CORNER IS ALREADY DEVELOPED WITH THIS UNDESIRABLE HOUSES FOR THE AREA AND LOCATION.

DON'T FURTHER AD TO THE NEGATIVE SITUATION.

ROWLETT CITIZENS AND HOME ORDINANCE DESERVE BETTER.

RESPECT US. LONG BRANCH CREEK WAS FULL DURING THE RAIN EVENT. NEXT COMMENT.

KAETH JEROME THE LAND AT MILLER ROAD HAS BEEN IN MY FAMILY SINCE THE 70 SXAE SPENT MY CHILDHOOD THERE.

SEVERAL DEVELOPER HAD AN INTERESTING IN THE PERMANENT AND THE MOST THERE ARE INTEREST FROM FAMILY HOME DEVELOPERS.

THE CURRENT DEVELOPMENT IS A HIGHER ENDS PLAN THAT HAVE HOMES FOR SALE EARLY. THOSE RESYRIAEDING HAVE PRIDE IN OWNERSHIP MAKE FOR A STABLE ENVIRONMENT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND COMMUNITY. DEVELOPER WING ON THIS FOR A YEAR AND INVESTED TIME AND MONEY TO WORK WITH CITY STAFF.

INCLUDING MODIFYING THE PLAN ITS INCLUDES LARGE ARE LOTS AND GRAEN SPACE AREA. THESE HOMES WILL BRING IN MORE IN TAX REVENUE FOR THE CITY THAN THE CURRENT USE AS A PASTOR K WITH AG EXCEPTION. NEW HOMES WILL ATTRACT YOUNG FAMILIES AND EVERYONE IN BETWEEN WHO WILL BUY GAS, GROCERIES AND SHOP AT BUSINESSES THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL MAKE ROWLETT MORE DESIRABLE AND INCREASE PERMANENT VALUES AND A NET POSITIVE FORWARD CITY. THIS DEVELOPER HAS A GREAT TRACK RECORD DESIGNING A NUMBER OF SUCCESSFUL ATTRACTIVE NEIGHBORHOODS INCLUDING ONE IN EARLY STAGES ACROSS THE STREET.

I SEE NO REASON WHY A PROBLEM FOR TO YOU VOTE YES FOR THE NEW HOMES. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. I HAVE NOT RECEIVED A COMMENT UPON XRSHMENT FORM IN THE CITY. AM I'M SENDING AN E MAIL TO ACTUAL I APPROVE THE REZONING AND 3802 MILLER ROAD AND RAIL AT

[01:55:07]

BOTH LOCATIONS. MILL AND ARE ROWLETT ROAD.

ORDINARY CARE. WITH THAT I THE CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING AND BEFORE WE MOVE TO A MOTION DOES ANYBODY ON THE COMMISSION HAVE ANY CLARIFICATION QUESTIONS FOR EITHER STAFF OR THE APPLICANT. OKAY.

I'M READY FOR A MOTION. ARE WE HAVING CONVERSATION OR GO STRAIGHT TO THE MOTION. WHO IS ASKING ME THAT? THIS IS ROB SWIFT. ROB, TYPICALLY WE DOT MOTION AND HAVE CONVERSATION BUT IF YOU HAVE -- I HAVE NOTHING TO SAY.

I APOLOGIZE. THAT'S OKAY.

SINCE I'M SPEAKING A MOTION TO DISAPPROVE THE REQUEST FOR REZONING. WE HAVE A MOTION TO DENY APPROVAL FOR THIS ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS THERE A SECOND? A SECOND BY JOHN. WE GOT A MOTION BY MR. SWIFT AND A SECOND AND NOW WOULD ANYBODY LIKE TO COMMENT BEFORE WE TAKE A VOTE? MR. COTE? I LIKE TO OPEN UP WITH A FEW COMMENTS.

I APPRECIATE SKORBURG'S EFFORTS ON -- ATTEMPT TO DEVELOP THIS PERMANENT. AND THEY ARE MOVING IN THE APPROPRIATE DIRECTION HOWEVER, I STILL DON'T THINK THAT WE ARE A FAR CRY WHERE WE NEED TO BE TO RESPECT THE CURRENT HOMEOWNERS -- AND -- RESIDENTS. THERE IS JUST TOO MANY THINGS THAT -- ARE ACCEPTED A QUOTE, UNQUOTE, EXISTING ROWLET DEVELOPMENT CODE. OKAY.

ANYONE ELSE LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT.

YOU ARE MUTED. AND TO FOLLOW UP ON COMMISSIONER COTE. YOU OTHER THAN IT SEEMS LIKE EVERY TIME WE HAVE THE MEETINGS AND YOU KNOW IF IT SAYS SF10 OR SF40 EVERYBODIMENTS TO REDUCE IT DOWN TO SF5.

IT IS UNFORTUNATE WE CAN'T COME TO SOMETHING IN BETWEEN.

AND LIKE JOHN WAS SAYING WE APPRECIATE WHAT SKORBURG HAS DONE YOU INCORPORATED GOOD IDEAS YOU PUT TIME IN THIS DEVELOPMENT BUT I STILL DO NOT NEIL IS RIGHT.

SOME QUESTIONS THAT CAME UP TONIGHT BY THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD IS CAN WE MATCH THE LOTS TO THE SOUTH.

I >> YOU HAVE GONE AND DONE IT AND DONE QUITE AN IMPROVE AM OF TRYING TO INCREASE THE LOTS BUT I'M IN FAVOR OF SEEING THE LOTS BE INCREASED.

ALL THE LOTS INCREASE SAID. MR. SEEINGER ANY COMMENTS.

YEA. I PUT MY TWO CENT IN.

I AGREE WITH MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS.

I THINK -- THEY ARE ON THE RIGHT TRACK.

I WOULD LIKE AN SF7, I 3 IT OUT THERE.

THAT WOULD BE A HAPPY MEDIUM. SF40 IS A FAR CRY FROM REALITY.

DROP TO SF5 IS -- TOO FAR. THE ONE ACROSS THE STREET I FELT

[02:00:03]

A UNIQUE SITUATION AND I THINK IT IS A DIFFERENCE IN THIS SPECIFIC PROPERTY AND -- THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY.

MR. COTE. >> YEA.

I WAS ABLE TO RECALL WHAT I WANTED SAY EARLIER.

THE FACT THAT WHAT WE ARE LOOKING AT NOW WHAT'S IN FRONT OF US IS NOT WHAT WE WOULD WANT TO APPROVE TO BEGIN WITH IT DOES NOT MEET THE 60 FOOT ROAD RIGHT AWAY.

SO I'M NOT AT ALL INTERESTED IN APPROVING WHAT WE SEE NOW IN FRONT OF US. BECAUSE OF THAT.

MR. DAVIS AND MORGAN. ANYBODY WANT TO COMMENT ANY FURTHER. I WAS GOING TO ECHO WHAT HAS BEEN SAID. I FEEL LIKE REDUCING THE NUMBER OF LOT SYSTEM A MOVE IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION BUT THERE ARE TOO MANY EXCEPTIONS. SO -- THANK YOU, SURE.

MISCELLANEOUS MORGAN. THEY ARE ASKING FOR TOO MANY VARIANCES AND IT IS TOO FAR THE DEPARTURE FROM THE STATE.

SF40 WE HAVE FEW OF LEFT IN THE CITY TO BUY IT OUT.

>> THANK YOU. >> I WOULD LIKE TO CHIME IN A BIT -- SPECIAL AGREE THAT THERE IS JUST TOO MANY THING ITS IS NOT LIKE THERE IS ONE THING THAT'S ONE THING THAT ARE FEW JAY HOOK IN THERE. SMALL ARE LOT SIZES, OF COURSE.

AND WANT TO ECHO WHAT JOHN SAID ABOUT WE ARE NOT LOOKING, THEY ARE PROMISING THEY WOULD MOVE TO 60 FOOT DRIVEWAYS BUT NOT SEEING HOW THAT WILL AFFECT THE PLAN, YET.

AND THAT CONCERNS ME. THERE ARE FEW IMPACT I DON'T THINK I CAN SUPPORT THIS, THIS EVENING.

IF THERE IS NO OTHER COMMENTS WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO DENY THIS ITEM AND LET'S GO AHEAD AND VOTE.

BY RAISE OF HANDS YOU ARE AGREEING TO DENY APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM. LET'S VOTE.

AND THAT ITEM IS UNANIMOUS. OKAY.

[4B. Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation to City Council on an application by Austin Entrop for the approval of a Special Use Permit to allow for a 1,500 square foot accessory structure on property zoned Single Family Residential (SF-40) District. The approximately 1-acre site is located approximately 730 feet west of the intersection of Toler Road and Liberty Grove Road, in the City of Rowlett, Dallas County, Texas.]

WE WILL MOVE ON TO ITEM 4B. THAT IS TO CONNECT A PUBLIC HEARING AND RECOMMEND TO COUNCIL ON AN APPLICATION BY AUSTIN ENTROP FOR THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT ALLOW FOR A MANY00 SQUARE FOOT STRUCTURE IN SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SF40 DISTRICT. THERE IS ONE UPON 7 INCH IN

[02:05:02]

DIAMETER DDH A PECAN TREE THIS IS MARKED FOR REMOVAL FOR THE PLACEMENT OF THIS ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN THE REAR YARD.

SHOULD THE SUP APPROVED. NEXT SLIDE, LAURA? UM -- FURTHER YOU KNOW SECTION 77303 OUT LINES A FEW MORE REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES APPLICABLE TO THIS ONE. NUMBER AND SIZE IS -- PERMITOD RESIDENTIAL LOTS REGULATED BY THE MAXIMUM LOT IN THE ZONING OR 35% OF THE REAR YARD THE LESSER OF THOSE 2 SHALL NOT EXCEED THE HEIGHT OF THE PRIMARY OR THE ZONING DISTRICT.

WHICH IS LESS AND BH LOCATED IN THE REAR YARD THERE IS A MINIMUM 3 FOOT SIDE AND REAR SET REQUIREMENT.

WE WILL EXPLORE THOSE REQUIREMENTS AS WE CONDITION THROUGH, LAURA. AGAIN, THE LESS ARE OF THE ZONING DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS OR 35% OF REAR YARD WHICH EVER IS LESS. SF40 DOES NOT HAVE A MAXIMUM COVERAGE REQUIREMENT IT IS THE LARGEST RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.

AND SO BY DEFAULT WE LOOK TO 35% OF THE REAR YARD BASED ON AVERAGE IS 8, 400 FEET THE REAR YARD WILL BE 3, 760 SQUARE FEET.

THAT INCLUDES THE PORTIONS OF PAVEMENTS AND -- PROPOSED DRIVEWAY. AS WELL AS THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN OTHER STRUCTURES IN THE REAR.

AND OBVIOUSLY THAT DOES NOT EXCEED THE 35%.

SO IN THAT ESSENCE IT IS COMPLIANT.

NEXT SLIDE, LAURA. MOVING ON TO THOSE CRITERIA THE HEIGHT SHALL NOT EXCEED THE LESSER OF THE ZONING DISTRICT REQUIREMENT OR THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE IT IS LESS COMING IN 19 FEET COMPARE TO THE 40 FOOT ZONING REQUIREMENT OR MINIMUM, RATHER. THIS ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IS 14 FEET AND 3 INCH IN HEIGHT AND IN COMPLIANCE.

NOW I WANT TO SAY WE ARE TALK OF HEIGHT THERE IS NO FENCE SCREENING THIS STRUCTURE. BUT TO THE SOUTH OR ADJACENT PROPERTIES THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL TREE COVER THAT WILL SHOW YOU A BIT LATER ON -- THAT WILL STEP INSPECT AND THAT REGARD.

SO. NEXT SLIDE.

LAURA. FINALLY WHEN THE STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN THE REAR YARD WE LOOKED FOR A 3 FOOT SIDE AND REAR FOOT SETBACK. WE ARE GETTING A 23 FOOT REAR SETBACK TO THE SMALL ARE LOTS TO THE SOUTH.

WE ARE GETTING 10 FEET FROM THE CLOSEST NEIGHBOR THAT WILL END UP BEING TO THE EAST. NORTH -- ON THIS IMAGE HERE WILL BE FACING DOWN. AND THEN ROUGHLY 115 OR SO FROM THE WESTERN PERMANENT LINE AND A SUBSTANTIAL 220 FEET OR SO FROM TOLLER ROAD TO THE NORTH THAT WOULD BE THE FRONT OF THE PERMANENT. AND JUST FOR REFERENCE IT IS 86 FEET FROM THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. NEXT SLIDE.

LAURA. UM SITE PHOTOS YOU SEE HERE THE INLAY OF APPROXIMATELY THAT FOOTPRINT IN RED.

YOU SEE THAT TREE LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SQUARE.

TO BE REMOVED. NEXT SLIDE.

LAURA? ANOTHER IMAGE THIS IS LOOKING EASTWARD THAT ACCESS ROW STRUCTURE ON AJOINING PERMANENT.

NOT ON THIS PROPERTY. NEXT SLIDE, LAURA? HERE THE APPLICANT IS CALLED OUT THE EXISTING TREE LINE TO THE SOUTH. YOU SEE THAT LINE OF TREES HERE WITH AGAIN THE EXISTING STRUCTURE ON THE NEIGHBORING PERMANENT TO THE LEFT THERE FOR REFERENCE.

SEE WHERE THE GARAGE WILL BE PLACED TOWARD THE LEFT OF THE PHOTO. NEXT SLIDE, LAURA?

[02:10:02]

WEED NOTICED FOR THIS PROJECT ON DECEMBER AM 23RD.

SENT OUT 2200 NOTICES AND 35, 500 FOOT NOTICES.

3 IN OPPOSITION AND TWO IN FAVOR BETWEEN THE 200 FOOTED RADIUS AND ONE IN FAVOR WITH THE 500 DP RECEIVED 2 NOTICE IN FAVOR BEYOND THE 500 RADIUS. DUE TO THE AREA OF THOSE NOT IN FAVOR A SUPER MAJORITY VOTE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL THEY FEEL TRIGGER THE 20% RULE. TRAVEL'S RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE ENCLOSED 1500 SQUARE FOOT STRUCTURE.

TELL NOT COMPROMISE THE INTENT OF THE DISTRICT OR ESTATE RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SINGLE VALLEY LAND EVERLAND USE PATTERN IN THE AREA.

SF40 LOTS AND MATERIAL, COLOR AND USE ARE COMPAT OKAY WITH BUILT ENVIRONMENT. THERE ARE ACCESS ROW STRUCTURES WENT SF40 BUILT OUT IN THAT AREA.

NEXT SLIDE. LAURA THIS CONCLUDES.

I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS THE APPLICANT IS HERE AND IF HE MIGHT WISH TO SPEAK TO A COUPLE IMAGES AS WELL.

THAT DOES CONCLUDE. THANK YOU, SIR.

DO YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ON THIS.

DOES THE APPLICANT WANT TO MAKE A PRESENTATION.

I DON'T HAVE A PRESENTATION I WANTED TO MAKE A COUPLE OF BRIEF COMMENTS ON THIS. AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME THIS EVENING. FOR LOOKING AT THIS.

WAIT A MOMENT. I DON'T KNOW THAT YOU ARE SITTING THE MEETING TONIGHT. SUZANNE HAVE YOU GOT HIM DOWN AS SITTING THE MEETING. I THOUGHT OUR ALTERNATE WAS --

I'M THE APPLICANT. >> YOU OTHER APPLICANT.

I'M SORRY. HE IS I'M CONFUSED.

GO AHEAD, SIR. YES.

THIS EVENING I'M NOT ACTING AS A MEMBER I'M AN ALTERNATE BUT

>> THE 3 MACES ARE THE 1S THAT SENT IN THEY WERE NOT IN FAVOR OF. I HAVE PROVIDED TWO PHOTOS I THINK WE ARE READY TO PULL UP AND HOUSE. YES, THIS IS A GOOD PHOTO. THIS IS STANDING ON MY PROPERTY. THAT IS AN 18 FOOT HEADROOM. THAT COVERS THE ENTIRE BACK OF OUR PROPERTY. THIS WAS TAKEN JANUARY 12TH IN THE MIDDLE OF WINTER.

YOU CAN SEE THEY ARE EVERGREEN. DON'T DROP YOUR LEAVES. IT STAYS GREEN AND SOLID ALL YEAR ROUND. YOU CAN SEE THE THICKNESS OF IT.

THE 3 PROPERTIES IN OPPOSITION OF THIS MOTION OR APPLICATION YOU CAN SEE YOU CAN EVEN SEE THEIR HOUSES THROUGH THIS. ALSO TOOK HIM A PHOTO WHERE I STEPPED ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE HEADROOM. WHILE THAT'S BEEN BROUGHT UP ADDITIONS EITHER SIGN.

SO THIS IS THE OTHER SIDE OF THAT AND I POINTED OUT THE 2 HOUSES THAT HAVE MADE THEIR THINGS. YOU CAN SEE THE PROPERTY LINE THERE.

THAT HEADROOM IS 10 OR 15 FEET INTO MY PROPERTIES. THIS CLEAR SPACE HERE IS MY PROPERTY. IT'S JUST A UTILITY EASEMENT. WE'VE GOT SOME GAS LINES AND SEWER LINES THAT RUN UNDERNEATH THERE. SOME WILL NEVER BUILD ANYTHING THERE. ALSO FROM THE SIDE YOU CAN SEE THE EDGE ROW BLOCKS THE VIEW OF MY POTENTIAL GARAGE WERE GONNA PUT BACK THERE. AND I THINK THE LETTERS WILL GET BREAD INTO RECORD. I'M NOT SURE WHY. MAYBE THEY GET READ IT LATER.

[02:15:07]

IF SO YOU WILL NOTE 1 OF THEM, THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT HOW BLOCKS THE VIEW IS.

I'VE ADDRESSED OUR PART. THE OTHER PART IS THEY HAVE SOME CONCERNS ABOUT, I HAVE A TRACTOR AND OTHER EQUIPMENT AND TRAILER AND THINGS WE USE BECAUSE WERE ON A LARGE ONE ACRE PROPERTY OVER HERE. ALL OF OUR NEIGHBORS ON OUR STREET ARE ON AN ACRE TOO.

THEY DON'T LIKE SEEING THE TRACTOR OUT. THIS BUILDING, THIS GARAGE WOULD EFFECTIVELY REMOVE THE TRACTOR AND THE TRACTOR AND TRAILER WILL BE STORED INSIDE OF THIS GARAGE. HOPEFULLY THAT WILL ALLEVIATE SOME OF THEIR CONCERNS.

THEN THE FINAL THING I WILL LEAVE IT WITH IS BOTH OF MY NEIGHBORS HAVE VOTED IN SUPPORT OF THIS. THE FEW THAT VOTED AGAINST IT ARE IN A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT NEIGHBORHOOD. ALTHOUGH OUR BACKYARDS TO TOUCH.

YOU HAVE TO COMPLETELY LEAVE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND GO DOWN THE ACCESS ROAD AND COME INTO ANOTHER SIDE TO GO INTO THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD AND THEY ARE REAL SMALL LOTS.

OURS IS A MESS OF 40, THE BIGGEST ONE LIKE I SAID ON ONE ACRE LOTS FOR ME IN BOTH OF MY NEIGHBORS. TO THE LEFT AND RIGHT OF ME. WITH THAT SAID WELL, YEAH.

THAT'S ALL I HAVE RIGHT NOW. UNLESS THERE'S ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS FOR ME.

>> OKAY THEY KEEP. SORRY FOR THE CONFUSION. OKAY.

COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS FOR APPLICANT OR STAFF ON THIS ITEM?

>> OKAY. YES? >> I JUST HAVE ONE QUESTION.

THERE WERE NO THE SU OP'S IN THIS AREA. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THIS AREA IT SEEMS LIKE THERE ARE SEVERAL EXTREMELY LARGE STRUCTURES AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES.

IN FACT RIGHT ON THE STREET THERE'S ONE THAT APPEARS TO BE ALMOST TALLER THAN THE PRIMARY RESIDENCE. IS IT JUST THAT THEY NEVER REQUESTED AN SEP OR NEVER

SUBMITTED AN SEP? >> THERE ARE FEW THINGS THAT COULD BE COMING INTO PLAY.

WHAT COULD BE THE AGE AND THE SIMPLY MIGHT'VE BEEN INSTALLED OR PERMITTED PRIOR TO COMING TO THAT REQUIREMENT. THAT'S LIKELY THE ALTERNATIVES. THEY PREDATED OUR CODE.

>> OKAY. THANK YOU. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR ANYBODY? SORRY, BOTH OF THE MAJOR PRESENTATIONS.

I THINK WERE READY FOR EMOTION. >> PUBLIC CARRYING. >> YEAH.

>> OH I'M SORRY, YOU'RE RIGHT. AT THIS TIME ALL OF THAT THE PUBLIC CARRYING.

DO WE HAVE ANY ANYONE ON THE PHONES? >> YES WE DEAL.

>> OKAY. JUST A REMINDER TO THE CALLERS. THEY WILL BE ASKED TO UNMUTE WHEN YOU'RE RECOGNIZED. WHEN YOU ARE RECOGNIZED PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. AND YOU WILL BE NEEDED AT THE END OF THE 3 MINUTES.

SO, >> 4022, DO YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THIS ITEM? IF SO PRESS áSIX TO UNMUTE. JR SCHOOL THE D D WISH TO ADDRESS THIS ITEM? NO RESPONSE FOR THE COURT WILL TURN IT OVER TO SUSAN IF SHE HAS ANY EMAILED COMMENTS.

>> I DO NOT HAVE ANY COMMENTS. >> OKAY. AT THIS TIME WE WILL THEN CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AND A VERB READY FOR EMOTION. MR. CONTE?

>> YES MAN MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FOR SEP. AS REQUESTED.

>> OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM ON THE AGENDA.

[02:20:03]

DO WE HAVE A SECOND? >> WE HAVE A SECOND BY MR. INCOME.

SORRY WES I SAW HIM FIRST. SO WE HAVE A FIRST WHAT MR. GOTAY AND SECOND BY MR. DASH.

FOR APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM. LET'S ALL SHOW PANTS FOR APPROVAL.

AGAIN THAT IS UNANIMOUS CARRY. ALL RIGHT. WE ARE READY TO MOVE ON TO ITEM

[4C. Consider and make a recommendation to City Council on a request by Kirkman Engineering for approval of a Tree Mitigation Plan and related Tree Removal Permit application on property zoned Single-Family (SF-9) District. The 17.07-acre site is located 2,601 feet east of the Intersection of Rowlett Road and Big A Road in the City of Rowlett, Dallas County, Texas.]

4C. CONSIDER AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL ON REQUEST BY KIRKLAND ENGINEERING FOR APPROVAL OF A TREE MITIGATION PLAN AND RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT APPLICATION ON PROPERTY SINGLE-FAMILY SF-DISTRICT.

THE 17 ACRE SITE IS LOCATED 2601 FEET EAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF RELEVANT ROAD AND BIG GAY RULLED IN THE CITY OF ROWLETT DALLAS COUNTY TEXAS. MRS. BRADLEY?

>> GOOD EVENING, THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS. THANK YOU CHAIRPERSON ESTEVEZ.

OKAY SO, AS EXPLAINED EARLIER THIS IS TO CONSIDER TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON A TREE MITIGATION PLAN AND RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT. IT IS FOR 17 ACRES OF PROPERTY THAT IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BIG STATE ROAD AND IT'S A PROXIMALLY 2000 206 FEET ROAD OF THE INTERSECTION OF ROWLETT ROAD. AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE MAP THE RED SHOWS THE LOCATION OF THIS PROPERTY. ON THE SIDE IT HAS APPROXIMATELY 3 ACRES OF FLOODPLAIN ON THE SITE.

PLEASE. >> WITH THE TREATMENT REMOVAL REQUEST IT IS ASKED IN OUR CODE THAT WE PRESERVE ESTABLISHED TREES AND ENCOURAGED AND SET OUT REGULATIONS GOVERNING REMOVAL STANDARDS FOR PROTECTION OF TREES DURING CONSTRUCTION.

WITH THIS IF THERE'S 3 OR MORE PROTECTED TREES BEING REMOVED IT IS BY RECOMMENDATION OF TMC AND WILL BE ACTED ON A FINAL DECISION BY THE CITY COUNCIL. WHAT WE CONSIDER HERE WHEN WE LOOKING AT THESE PROTECTED TREES ARE PROTECTED TREES ARE DEFINED AS CHEESE A MINIMUM OF 8 INCHES CALIBER. ALSO TREES THAT ARE NOT LISTED ON OUR PROHIBITED PLANT LIST AND NOT CONSIDERED PRODUCTIVE TREES. AS YOU SEE AS WE GO THROUGH THIS REMAINING SCIENCE THERE ARE A COUPLE OF COTTONWOOD TREES WHICH ARE ON THE NONPROTECTED LIST. EXCUSE ME, BUT THE PROHIBITED PPLANT LIST.

PLEASE LAURA. WHEN WE LOOK AT THIS TREE REMOVAL PERMIT REQUEST THE APPLICANT DOES PROPOSE TO PRESERVE A MAJORITY OF TREES IN THE FLOODPLAIN AREA AND ALONG THE PERIMETERS. TREES TO BE REMOVED BASICALLY ARE DUE TO FALLING BECAUSE IT'S TO ENSURE PROPER DRAINAGE AROUND BUILDING PATHS. IF YOU LOOK TO THE RIGHT ON YOUR SCREEN YOU WILL SEE VARIOUS LOCATIONS WERE TREES WILL BE REMOVED.

PRIMARILY IN THAT BACK AREA TO THE EAST ALONG THE EASTERN BORDER LINE A LOT OF THOSE TREES WILL BE REMOVED AND THUS TO HELP WITH PROPER DRAINAGE AROUND THE BUILDING PATHS.

ALSO WHEN WE HAVE DEVELOPMENT COMING IN TO THE CITY A LOT OF TIMES DURING THIS DEVELOPMENT OTHER TREES THAT ARE NOT SLATED FOR REMOVAL CAN SOMETIMES BE IMPACTED BECAUSE OF DEVELOPMENT AND ALSO DISTURB THE ROOT SYSTEM. ALSO TO WITH THIS THEY ARE ANTICIPATING ROOT DISTURBANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION. AND NOW ALSO TO BECAUSE THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE LAND GRADING CHANGES MAY NOT BE CONDUCIVE FOR THE SURVIVAL OF EXISTING TREES THAT ARE ON THIS LOT AS IT IS TODAY. THEY TOOK INTO CONSIDERATION AN ADDITIONAL MITIGATION MEASURE AND THAT IS TO SHORT THE RETAINING WALL TO PREVENT IMPACTED TREES DURING CONSTRUCTION GRADING CHANGES. ON THE NEXT SLIDE WE WILL SEE HOW THAT PLAYS INTO THIS DEVELOPMENT. I'LL GO QUICKLY THROUGH THOSE POINTS ON THE SIDE. ALSO AS JEFF IF HE CAN ELABORATE ON THIS CROSS-SECTION THAT WAS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT. THE SITE REQUIRES BOTH CUT AND FILLED FOR DEVELOPMENT. THE RETAINING WALL LOT GRADING WHERE TREES CAN BE SAV WILL ALL FOR DEVELOPMENT PROPER SITE DAMAGE TO MARKET DRAINAGE. JEFF CAN WALK US THROUGH THIS

[02:25:03]

DIAGRAM TO HELP US BETTER UNDERSTAND HOW THE REMOVAL OF TREES WILL OCCUR.

>> OKAY, SO READING THE CROSS-SECTION LEFT TO RIGHT. THE LEFT-HAND SIDE IS THE

ADJACENT SUBDIVISION, HELP ME OUT TARIQ, LIBERTY SOMETHING? >> LIBERTY CREEK.

>> LIBERTY CREEK. THAT'S LIBERTY CREEK ON THE LEFT-HAND SIDE.

THIS SITE IS CHARACTERIZED BY A LOT OF GREAT RELIEF. AT THE GROUND SLOPES AWAY FROM LIBERTY CREEK TOWARDS THE CREEK AND THE FLOODPLAIN THIS IS WHERE THEY'RE GOING TO BUILD A ROAD, LOWER CHEMICAL BACK ONE SLIDE PLEASE. THANK YOU.

THE MAIN STREET WITH A CUL-DE-SAC YOU SEE ON THE BOTTOM OF THE SCREEN THERE APPEARED NORTH IS TO THE LEFT, SLIDE (YOU COULD FORWARD AGAIN PLEASE LAURA.

THANK YOU. THAT STREET YOU SEE IN THE CROSS-SECTION THERE.

THERE'S THE WORD CUT AND THERE IS A TREE SITTING ON TOP OF A TRIANGULAR CUT OUT I GUESS IF YOU WILL. THAT IS THE ROAD.HAT WILL BE THE CUL-DE-SAC.

THEY'RE CUTTING AWAY A LOT OF THE GROUND TO BUILD THE HOUSES. THE HOUSES GENERALLY HAVE TO BE NEAR ROAD ELEVATION. THAT IS THE ROOT ELEVATION THAT WORKS WITH THE REST OF THE SITE. THEN, AS YOU MOVE, CONTINUE TO MOVE RIGHT YOU SEE THE GROUND SLOPES EVEN FURTHER AWAY. BUT GOING TO HAVE TO EITHER CUT AWAY A LITTLE BIT AND FELT A LITTLE BIT AND THERE IS ANOTHER WALL THERE AND THAT WALL IS PROTECTING THE REST OF THE TREES THAT YOU SEE FURTHER TO THE RIGHT WHERE OTHERWISE THERE WOULD B AN EMBANKMENT AND THAT TREE, BUT THE RETREAT FROM THE RIGHT MIGHT BE IN JEOPARDY IF THEY DID NOT HAVE THAT WALL AND THEY BUILT AN EMBANKMENT INSTEAD. THAT EMBANKMENT MIGHT JEOPARDIZE THE HEALTH OF THE TREE. OF COURSE THE FLOODPLAIN AND THE STING OUT OF THE FLOODPLAINS SO THAT COMPLETES THE PICTURE.

IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE I NEED TO ADD TARA? >> THANK YOU JEFF.

>> NEXT SLIDE PLEASE LAURA. SO, OVERALL CONSIDERATION OF THIS.

THE TREE SERVICE THEY PROVIDED WILL REFLECT 950 TREES WHICH TOTAL 9964 CALIBER INCHES.

WITH THIS 954 TREES, 9917 CALIBER INCHES ARE PROTECTED TREES.

WE DO HAVE MORE THAT ARE NONPROTECTED BECAUSE ONE IS A CEDAR ELEMENT THAT IS DAMAGED.

THAT GETS LUMPED INTO A NONPROTECTED TREE. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO SAVE 384 TREES. FOR 4308 CALIBER INCHES. THEY DO PLAN TO REMOVE 574 TREES. WHICH IS 5600 56 INCHES. WITHOUT BECAUSE THERE IS A DEFICIT THEY WILL HELP TO MITIGATE FOR THESE TREES THAT THEY ARE REMOVING.

SO, WITH THIS WE HAVE MITIGATION WHICH EQUALS REMOVE CALPERS MINUS STAY CALPERS.

WITHOUT WIT THEY HAVE 1003 HAD A 48 CALPERS, INCHES REQUIRED FOR MITIGATION WITH THIS PROJECT. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE LAURA. AS DISCUSSED PREVIOUSLY IN THE SIDE THERE WERE 909.

THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO REMOVE 500 AND 56 CALIBER INCHES AND TO SAVE THE 4300 CALIBER INCHES. ALSO TOO IN ORDER TO MITIGATE THIS THEY WILL ALSO PLANT 24 4 CALIBER INCHES TREES FOR TOTAL OF 96 INCHES WHICH WILL BE LOCATED IN THE COMMON AREA AROUND SOME THE FLOODPLAIN WHERE THEY REMOVE PREVIOUS TREES.

THEY DID RECEIVE A CREDIT THE STATE PROTECTED TREES T THE REMOVED PROTECTED TREES.

[02:30:02]

WITH THIS IN THE CALCULATION OF THE 96 INCH CALIBER INCHES THE TOTAL MITIGATION REQUIREMENT IS 1252 CALIBER INCHES OR WE CAN EQUATE THAT TO 313 4 INCH CALIBER TREES.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE LAURA. WITH THAT, THEY WOULD BE PAID THAT INTO THE TREE FUND.

REFORESTATION FUND WHICH WOULD BE A TOTAL OF $152,331.

$21.64.

TREE PRESERVATION PLAN AND THE APPLICANT HAS THOUGHTFULLY PRESERVE THE TREES ON FLOOD PLANE WORKED DILIGENTLY TO MINIMIZE THE NUMBER TREES TO BE REMOVED TO PREPARE THE SITE FOR DEVELOPMENT. THIS CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND AM AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE AND THE APPLICANT IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE AS WELL.

THEY DO HAVE A SHORT PRESENTATION THAT THEY WILL BE PROVIDING.

>> LET'S GO HEAD AND HEAR THE APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION. IS EVERYONE OKAY WITH THAT? OKAY. WILL THE APPLICANT COME FORWARD PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND

ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. >> MY NAME IS PATRICK BURLISON WITH KIRKWOOD ENGINEERING MY ADDRESS 5200 STATE HIGHWAY 121 AND CALDWELL TEXAS. WE ARE REPRESENTING RM GIVES ME, THE DEVELOPER AND OWNER GOOD WITH BEN BEFORE YOU BEFORE WITH A WITH THE PLOT APPLICATION. THE ITEMS THAT HAVE BEEN BEFORE YOU AND THOSE ITEMS HAVE GONE THROUGH. NOW RUN THE NEXT STEP OF THIS PROCESS.

IN THE DEVELOPMENT PHASE. WHICH IS OUR TREAT REMOVAL PERMIT AND THEN OUR CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. I THINK TAMARA AND JEFF HIT ALL OF THE HIGH POINTS HERE.

WE CAN WORK THROUGH THAT WORK THROUGH A COUPLE OF ITEMS AS WELL AND REITERATE SOME OF THOSE POINTS. GENERALLY I THINK ALL OF THE ITEMS WERE DISCUSSED IF WE GO TO THE NEXT LINE HERE. KIND OF A ROADMAP OF WHERE BURGOYNE AND WEBER GOING HERE.

NEXT SLIDE. THE EXISTING CONDITION OF THE SITE IS HEAVILY TREED.

PATRICE OR ITEM OF DISCUSSION WHEN WE WERE DEALING WITH THE PLAT PART OF THE DISCUSSION BEFORE THIS COMMISSION SOMETIME LAST YEAR. IT'S A CHALLENGE FOR US AS A DEVELOPER TEAM. WOULD LIKE, WE HAD OPPORTUNITY TO PRESERVE TREES IS HIGH.

THEY DID ALSO PROVIDE A MORE MATURE NEIGHBORHOOD FEEL AND THAT'S WHAT WERE STRIVING TO APPEAL TO. BY THE END OF THE ROAD HERE. A REALLY GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO CREATE REALLY UNIQUE DEVELOPMENT WITH MATURE TREES WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT ITSELF.

SOME OF THE CHALLENGES THAT WE WILL TALK ABOUT IT JUST A MINUTE ARE REALLY IN RELATION TO GRADE AND HOW WE GO ABOUT PRESERVING THOSE TREES AND PRESERVING TREES WHERE IT MAKES THE MOST AMOUNT OF SENSE. WE WILL GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE. THESE ARE 9000 TREES ON SITE.

WERE PRESERVING 4000 INCHES OF TREES. A MAJORITY OF THOSE WILL BE A LONG THE CREEK AREA AND THE FLOOD WITHIN THE FLOODPLAIN AREA.

AND WE WILL TALK ABOUT SOME A THOUGHT PROCESS OF THE CONSTRAINTS THAT GO INTO THAT A SECOND AS WELL. WE WILL GO TO THE NEXT LINE. THE SAME EXHIBIT THAT TAMARA AND JEFF WERE EXPLAINING. WHEN WE'VE GOT A SITE LIKE WE DO HERE WITH A NUMBER OF TREES, A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF GRADE ACROSS THE SIDE. EAST AND REST, THE AVERAGE GRADE EITHER GOING UP OR DOWN IS ABOUT 10 PERCENT GRADE. WHICH IS NOT DEVELOPABLE.

WE'VE GOT A GREAT SOME FLUTTER SPOTS TO BUILD THE ROADS AND INFRASTRUCTURE AND THE PATHS OF

[02:35:04]

THESE HOMES WILL BE BUILT ON. THAT'S WHAT THIS IS DEPICTING. IN THE LITTLE PINK AREAS, THE ROADWAY. AND WHERE THOSE GO TO THE SITE. WE CAN'T JUST HAVE HOUSES THAT AREN'T ATTACHED TO THOSE ROADWAYS. THEY WILL BE RELATIVELY CLOSE TO THE SAME GRADE AS THE ROADWAY ELEVATIONS ARE. THE CHALLENGE HERE, EVERYTHING IS ALL TIED TOGETHER. WE'VE GOT CONSTRAINTS ON ALL 4 SIDES.

BEING THE EXISTING PROPERTY, THE EXISTING BIG A ROAD ELEVATION AND THE PLUG FLOODPLAIN. AS MOVE ONE OF THOSE ITEMS UP OR DOWN IT SAYS A TIDAL WAVE RIPPLE EFFECT THROUGHOUT THE SITE. AS WE MOVE THROUGH THE SITE ANYWHERE YOU'VE GOT ANY GRADE CHANGE EITHER CUT OR FILL THAT IS GOING TO DAMAGE A TREE AND YOU HAVE LITTLE FLEXIBILITY ON WHAT THE AMOUNT OF AREA YOU CAN GRADE AND AROUND A TRAIT WITHOUT DAMAGING IT TO THE POINT OF IT NOT BEEN ABLE TO SURVIVE.

THAT WAS THE CHALLENGE WE WERE DEALT WITH HERE. WE TRY TO IDENTIFY THE AREAS.

THAT MADE THE MOST AMOUNT OF SENSE. TARGET OUR GRADING PLAN TO THAT POINT. WE TRIED TO STAY AS TRUE TO THE ORIGINAL TREE PRESERVATION PLAN WE PROVIDED AS POSSIBLE WITH THE PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION WITHOUT ANY REAL ENGINEERING BE DONE. I KNOW WE POSTPONE THIS, THIS MEETING A NUMBER OF TIMES TO WORK WITH CITY STAFF, WORK WITH TORRENT NETWORK WHICH OF TO MAKE SURE WERE REALLY LOOKING AT EVERY ONE OF THESE AREAS SPECIFICALLY. AND ANY OPPORTUNITY TO DO SOMETHING FROM AN ENGINEERING STANDPOINT, FROM A DONOR STANDPOINT TO PRESERVE MORE TREES. THAT'S HOW WE GOT TO THE POINT WHERE WERE BUILDING THESE WALLS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. WE'VE GOT IT STRAIGHT WITH HOUSES ON EITHER SIDE OF IT THAT WILL HAVE RETAINING WALLS ON THE OTHER SIDE. TAMARA DID MENTION THE NUMBER OF HUNDRED $52,000 THAT WILL BE PAID INTO THE TREAT REFORESTATION FUND.

THAT DOESN'T ACCOUNT IT TO THE FACT OF THE OTHER ITEMS THAT THIS DEVELOPER WILL BE PAYING FOR TO HELP PRESERVEES AT ARE BEING PRESERVED.

OPEN FLAME AND KEEPING IT NATURAL, KEEPING IT FORESTED IS THE HIGHEST PRIORITY AND I THINK WE WILL PAY DIVIDENDS TO THE OVERALL COMMUNITY IN THE LONG RUN AND I THINK THAT'S WHAT WE SET OUT TO ACHIEVE AND HAVE SHOWN WE ARE DOING HERE. NEXT SLIDE.

I THINK TAMARA PRETTY WELL COVERED EVERYTHING. IF YOU'VE GOT ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME WE ARE HAPPY TO DISCUSS AND ANSWER IT ANYWAY WE CAN. I KNOW THE OWNER IS AVAILABLE.

SORRY IT'S SO DARK. >> THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENTATION.

I THINK WE HAVE A QUESTION FOR MR. CHO TODAY. >> EITHER PATRICK AND ãCAN ANSWER THIS. IF HE CAN BACK YOUR SLIDE NUMBER 5. FOR US.

AS A POSSIBLE? RIGHT THERE. I THINK THIS IS A COPY OF THIS MORNING. MY QUESTION TO YOU IS AND JUST OUT OF CURIOSITY BECAUSE I APPRECIATE THE EFFORT YOU GUYS HAVE GONE TO PRESERVE AS MANY TREES AS POSSIBLE. BUT, YOU NOTE THE TREE TO THE RIGHT OF THE WALL IS MARKED AS BEING REMOVED.WHAT IS THE PURPOSE BEHIND THAT? COULD YOU NOT RETAIN THE SAME GRADE ON THE RIGHT-HAND SIDE OF THE BALL THAT IS CURRENTLY THERE? THEREFORE YOU WANT TO DISPROVE DISRUPT THE ROOT SYSTEM OR IS

IT ABLE TO BUILD YOUR WALKWAY. >> I BELIEVE THAT TREE SHOULD BE SHOWN AS BEING PRESERVED.

>> YOU MIGHT WANT TO TAKE A LOOK AT THAT THEN.

IT MIGHT SAVE YOU A COUPLE OF BUCKS. >> YES, YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. I THINK IT'S JUST LABELED INCORRECTLY.

THE WALL IS THERE TO PRESERVE THAT TREE SPECIFICALLY. >> AND THE WHOLE AREA

DOWNSTREAM ABOUT. >> RIGHT. >> OKAY.

>> THAT'S THE INTENT OF THE WALL IN THE BACK PORTION OF THAT LOT.

[02:40:06]

IT IS TO PRESERVE THAT TREE AS QUICKLY AS AT THE END BEHIND THOSE HOUSES.

>> RIGHT. OKAY. >> I HAVE ONE QUESTION FOR

TARA. >> SURE. >> THIS IS JUST BECAUSE THIS HAS COME UP A COUPLE OF TIMES. HOW COME I CAN'T SEE YOU TARA, WHERE ARE YOU?

>> I'M RIGHT HERE. >> PATRICK CALLED YOU TARA SO I DID TOO.

>> MY PHONE. >> THE TREAT REFORESTATION FUND.

HOW WERE THOSE FUNDS USED? >> USED TO REPLANT, PURCHASE TREES AND PLANT THEM IN DIFFERENT SITES AROUND THE CITY. THAT IS WHAT THE PRE- 4 STATION

FUND IS FOR. >> MY QUESTION IS, HOW ARE THOSE FUNDS COTTON?

I MEAN IS IT FOR CITY PROJECTS? >> YES, IT'S FOR PAINTING IN PARKS.

SOMETIMES WE HAVE OPPORTUNITIES TO PLANT IN THE MEDIANS AS WELL.

THAT IS WHAT THAT FUND IS FOR. IT'S BASICALLY PUTTING THE CANOPY BACK INTO THE CITY

THROUGH THESE FUNDS. >> OKAY. >> AN EXAMPLE WOULD BE AFTER THE TORNADO WENT THROUGH ROWLETT. RETREAT FROM DALLAS CAYMAN AND WE HAD TO BUY A LOT OF TREES FOR THE CITY. MONEY FROM THIS FUND TO HELP PAY FOR SOME OF THOSE TREES. TORRENT WAS RIGHT ON SOME OF THE OTHER EXAMPLES TOO.

I JUST WANTED TO GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE OF SOME MAJOR ISSUE THAT COULD HAVE OCCURRED IN THE

CITY. >> GREAT. OKAY, WELL THIS IS A PUBLIC

HEARING. SO,B. >> THIS IS ON A PUBLIC HEARING.

IT'S FOR CONSIDERATION AND RECOMMENDATION. >> OKAY, I AM SORRY.

ALL RIGHT, ARE THERE ANY MORE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR EITHER THE APPLICANT OR CITY STAFF? ANYBODY? ALRIGHT I'M READY FOR MOTION

THEN. MR. CHO TAKE? >> YES MA'AM.

I MOVED TO APPROVE THE TREAT MITIGATION PLAN AS PRESENTED. BUGS OKAY WE HAVE A MOTION FOR

APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? >> MR. ÃWILL SECOND IT.

>> OKAY, ANY COMMENTS. ANYONE WANT TO SAY ANYTHING ABOUT THIS? ALL RIGHT. LET'S GO HEAD AND BOW THEN. A SHOW OF HANDS FOR APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT. LET'S VOTE.

THAT IS UNANIMOUS. THAT IS THE END OF

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.