Feb 09, 2021 Planning and Zoning Commission

HAVE FOR THAT ITEM? >> YES, WE WILL GO AHEAD AND

[1. CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:04]

IT'S A LITTLE EARLIER. LET'S GO AHEAD AND CONVENE THE REGULAR SESSION. WE WILL START WITH ITEM 3 SILT SENSE INPUT. TO PROVIDE A COMMENT, PLEASE WITH SUBMIT INPUT BY 3:30 THE DAY OF THE MEETING, AND COMMENT WHETHER IT'S A GENERAL COMMENT TO THE COMMISSION, AND YOUR COMMENT WILL BE READ INTO THE RECORD DURING THE MEETING.

THERE'S A 3-MINUTE TIME LIMIT. THE THERE WILL BE NO COMMENTS

TAKEN DURING THE MEETING. >>.

>> DO WE HAVE ANY CITIZEN'S INPUT FOR TONIGHT?

>> THEY WERE ALL AGENDA ITEM SPECIFIC.

>> OKAY. >> GREAT.

>> WE WILL MOVE ON TO ITEM 4, THE CONSENT AGENDA. ITEM 4 A,

[4. CONSENT AGENDA]

THE MINUTES? >> OKAY, I THINK THAT WE ARE

READY FOR A MOTION. >> I WILL MOTION TO ACCEPT IS

THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED. >> OKAY.

WE HAVE A MOTION FROM JOHN COTE TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES AS PRESENTED. DO WE HAVE A SECOND.

>> SECOND. >> WE HAVE A SECOND FROM MARC, ENGEN. EVERYONE TO APPROVE PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. .

>> I SHOW MYSELF, JOHN COTE, NINES ENGEN, AND MR. WINTON WILL ABSTAIN FROM ARE THE VOTE. AND THAT VOTE CARRIES ARES SO WE WILL MOVE TO ITEM NUMBER 5. I TELLS US FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION. BEFORE WE GET STARTED I WANT TO MENTION TO PROVIDE COMMENT DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ANY ITEM YOU CAN CALL TOLL FREE. (833) 568-8864 AND PROVIDE MEETING ID 1614369261. PLEASE WAIT FOR INSTRUCTION DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING SECTION FOR EACH ITEM.

COMMENTS RECEIVED AT CITIZEN AND INPUT AT ROWLETT.COM BY 3:30 P.M. TODAY WILL BE READ INTO THE RECORD DURING MEETING.

HOWEVER THEY MUST BE WITHIN THE 3-MINUTE TIME LIMIT.

[5A. Take action on the Merritt Park Preliminary Plat submitted by Greg Helsel, Spiars Engineering, on behalf of Arcadia Land Partners 33, Ltd. The approximately 40.4-acre site located at 9401 Merritt Road, in the City of Rowlett, Dallas County, Texas.]

>> TAKING ACTION ON THE MERRITT PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT, BY GREG HELSEL, ACCIDENT CADE YEAH LAND PARTNERS, 33 LIMITED.

THE SITE LOCATED AT 9410 MERRITT ROAD IN THE CITY OF ROWLETT,

DALLAS COUNTY TEXAS. >> AND MARE YOU PRESENTING.

>> YES, COMMISSIONERS, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AS WELL.

AS MS. LISA ESTEVEZ JUST STATED WE ARE LOOKING HE AT THE MERRITT PARK PRELIMINARY PLAT. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

>> THIS IS APPROXIMATELY 40.4 ACRES LOCATED JUST SOUTH OF HARMONY HILL LANE. ABOUT 500 FEET SOUTH OF THERE.

SPECIFICALLY LOCATED AT 9401 MERRITT ROAD.

THERE IS 2 PROPOSED ACCESSES OFF OF MERRITT ROAD WITH FUTURE CONNECTIVITY BEING ESTABLSHED BOTH TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH.

ACTUALLY ALL NORTH, SOUTH, AND WEST, WITH FUTURE STUB-OUTS, CAN PORTIONS OF LIBERTY GRUBB EXTENSION, SHALL I HIGHLIGHTED THAT IN GREEN. THAT WILL BE ESTABLISHED BY THIS PLAT, AND THAT WILL ALLOW FOR CONNECTIVITIVITY NORTH ONTOGAR LONDON, AND SAXXY. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

>> THE IMAGE TO YOUR RIGHT IS A COMBINATION OF THE FIRST 2 SHEETS OF THE PLAT WHICH ALLOW FOR YOU TO SEE THE ENTIRE TRACT.

BUT THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT REFLECTS 162 LOTS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES AND MIXED RESIDENTIAL USE US AND 11 OPEN SPACE LOTS. JUST AS A REFERENCE, IT WAS ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVED DICEY LEVINE.

AND IT MET ALL CODE REQUIREMENTS.

THE REGULATING PLAN DETERMINES GENERAL ALLOCATION OF OPEN

[00:05:01]

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. >> THE PRELIMINARY PLAT IS COMPOSED OF 2 DRAWING SHEETS WHICH THIS BEING THE FIRST 1 SHOWING THE HE HAVE HE WEST -- SORRY, THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE SITE ADJACENT TO MERRITT ROAD SHOWING THE 3 LARGER -- WELL, 4 LARGER LOTS. 3 OF THOSE BEING FOR THE MIXED RESIDENTIAL AND LIVE/WORK UNITS AS WELL AS LOT 10, THIS SMALLER RECTANGLE THERE BEING THE AMENITY CENTER OR OPEN SPACE.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. >> AND THIS PORTION FURTHER WEST SHOWS WHERE THE SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, AS PART OF THE NEW NEIGHBORHOOD ZONING WOULD OCCUR. AS WELL AS THE -- WHAT'S SHOWN THERE AS REASONINGENTS DRIVE WOULD BE FUTURE CONOAKIVITY OF GROVE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

FINAL PLATS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH PHASE PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE. PHASING WILL BE IN GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATING PLANS.

IT WILL SHALL EXPIRE WITHIN 2 YEARS WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF 1 OR MORE FINAL PLATS BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

ALL REQUIREMENTS AND THE TEXAS LOCAL CODE HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.

THE NEXT SLIDE SHOULD READ QUESTIONS.

>> OH, OUR RECOMMENDATION IS FOR APPROVAL OF DISDISTHIS PRELIMINARY PLAT. APPLICANTS, AND PROPERTY OWNER ARE BOTH PRESENT HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THEM.

THAT WOULD BE GREG HELSEL. AND BILL.

>> DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?

>> YES, JOHN, GO AHEAD. >> I JUST HAVE 1 QUESTION.

HAVE YOU HAD ANY FEEDBACK WHATSOEVER FROM ANYBODY ELSE IN THE WORLD WHO ARE USING VIEWS WITH THIS 20 FOOT WIDE VIEW ALLEYS WITH RESPECT TO TRAFFIC, AND TRAFFIC FLOW ESPECIALLY DURING EMERGENCY SITUATION? HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF ANYTHING -- OF THAT BEING A PROBLEM, I GUESS?

>> WE'VE HEARD -- WE'VE HAD SOME FEEDBACK IN PARTICULAR TO SOME OF OUR ESTABLISHED YOU COMMUNITIES LIKE HOMESTEAD.

WE HAVEN'T REALLY HAD ANY REAL ISSUES, BUT WE ARE WORKING WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT TO ESTABLISH THE SAFEST CONDITIONS FOR THESE NEW ALLEYS. SO WE ARE WORKING HAND IN HAND WITH THEM TO ASSURE THAT THERE'S PROPER ACCESS, AND IN TERMS OF TRAFFIC WE'VE NEVER REALLY HAD ANY ISSUES.

>> BUT THEN AGAIN, WE ALSO, LIKE AT LIBERTY GROVE, HOMESTEAD AND LIBERTY GROVE OR WHATNOT, WE HAVEN'T HAD AN EMERGENCY

SITUATION YET, HAVE WE? >> WE HAVE HAD SOME AND CONCERNS HAVE ACTUALLY BEEN IN REGARDS TO THE MAIN STREET ACCESSES, BUT NOT ACTUALLY IN REGARD TO THE ALLEYS.

>>. THAT WILL BE INTERESTING TO SEE THIS. ANYONE ELSE HAD, ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? IS THE APPLICANT HERE THIS

EVENING? >> I AM.

I'M HERE, MY NAME IS BILL, WITH ARCADIA REALTY, DALLAS.

>> DO YOU HAVE A PRESENTATION? >> NO.

WE'VE BEEN REALLY HAPPY WORKING WITH STAFF.

WE THOUGHT THAT THE ORIGINAL FRAMEWORK PLAN WAS SPOT ON, AND WE DREW A REGULATING PLAN WITH THAT, AND FOLLOWED THROUGH WITH THE PRELIMINARY PLAT. LOOKING FORWARD TO PROVIDING A NEW NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE CITY OF ROWLETT.

>> AND MS. ESTEVEZ, THIS IS PRETTY MUCH AN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS. THIS IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT.

IT IS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING. MAINLY JUST AN ACTION ITEM FOR

YOURSELVES. >> OKAY.

>> ALL RIGHT. WITH DOES ANYBODY OF THE COMMISSIONERS, HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?

>> NO, MA'AM, I WAS JUST GOING TO MAKE AN APPLICATION.

>> I WANT TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AS

PRESENTED. >> WE'VE GOT A MOTION TO APPROVE

[00:10:03]

>> WE HAVE A SECOND BY MR. STEPHEN WINTON.

EVERYONE IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.

WE'VE GOT YES, FROM ESTEVEZ, COTE, SWIFT, SEGARS, ENGEN AND ENTROP. THAT'S EVERYBODY.

SO THAT MOTION CARRIES. .

THANK YOU VERY MUCH EVERYONE. YOU BET.

>> THANK YOU. >> OKAY WE WILL MOVE TO ITEM 5

[5B. Consider and make a recommendation to the City Council on a request by Sam Lawrence, Narrowpath LLC., on behalf of property owner Meenu LLC., for approval of a Tree Mitigation Plan and related Tree Removal Permit application on property zoned Planned Development (PD) District for General Commercial/Retail (C-2) Uses. The approximate 1.17-acre site is located on Lot 1, Block A Bee Hive Addition, approximately 275 feet southeast of the intersection of Liberty Grove and Chiesa Roads, in the City of Rowlett, Dallas County, Texas.]

NARROWPATH, LLC. BY PROPERTY OWN OTHER MEENU TREE MITIGATION PLAN, AND TREE PERMIT, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR GENERAL COMMERCIAL C-2 USES, AND THE 1.17 ACRE SITE IS LOCATED ON 1 BLOCK A BEE HIVE ADDITION. PROBAB-OAPPROXIMATELY 275 FEET SOUTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF LIBERTY GROVE IN THE CITY OF

ROWLETT COUNTY OF DALLAS TEXAS. >> MR. ROBERTS PRESENTING.

>> THAT GET, CHAIR PERSON ESTEVEZ AND COMMISSIONERS FOR HAVING US THIS EVENING. WHAT WE HAVE FOR YOU TONIGHT IS A TREE MITIGATION PLAN AND RELATED TREE REMOVAL PERMITS JUST SHY OF A 2 ACRE SITE ABOUT 275 FEET SOUTHEAST HE HAVE THE INTERSECTION OF CHIESE AS LIBERTY GROVE.

IT IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION WITH A 2-PHASE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE, LAURA.

>> A LITTLE BACKGROUND ON THE SITE.

IT WAS ZONED WITH A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR AN AISED LIVING AND MEMORY CARE FACILITY.

AGAIN, THAT IS UNUNDER CONSTRUCTION WITH PHASE 1.

MAY HAVE 2019, THE DEVELOPMENT MANY MANY PLAN WAS APPROVED.

I DID OUTLINE THE 2 PHASES. A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT WAS APPROVED ADMINISTRATIVELY FOR PHASE 1 IN JULY OF LAST YEAR.

AND RIGHT ON CUE THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING AN ENTRY REMOVAL FOR PHASE 2. THAT WOULD BE 5 PROTECTED TREES.

THE GOAL THE PRESERVATION OF LONG-ESTABLISHED TREES.

IT DOES SET OUT REGULATIONS GOOFING OF GOVENING THE REMOVAL OF THEM. HOWEVER, 77504, OF THE HRC, DOES REQUIRE A APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL IF MORE THAN 3 PROTECTED TREES ARE REMOVED AFTER RECOMMENDATION BY YOURSELVES, THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

JUST TO REFRESH, THE PROTECTED TREES ARE ANY TREES NOT ON THE PROHIBITED INCH WITH 8 INCH CALIBER, WITH DIAMETER BREAST HEIGHT. THAT WOULD BE 11 INCHES FOR HACK BERRIES. NEXT, PLEASE

>> SO TAKING A QUICK LOOK AT THE PROVIDED MITIGATION PLAN THERE, THE PROTECTED TREES TO BE REMOVED ARE TO ACCOMMODATE AN EXTENSION OF ACCESS AND PARKING. WE SEE THAT IN YELLOW.

AS WELL AS THE MAIN BUILDING OF PHASE 2.

YOU SEE THAT. THAT IS IN THE CENTER LOWER END OF THE PLAN THERE. AND THE MOVEMENT OF EARTH AND THOSE BUILDINGS AND EXTENSIONS IS NOT CONDUCIVE TO THOSE TREES SURVIVING. SO I DO WANT TO NOTE THAT THE PROTECTED TREES TO BE REMOVED THAT YOU SEE ON SCREEN ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE APPROVED ZONING CONCEPT PLAN, ARE AND THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN. SO THIS LAYOUT IS CONSISTENT WITH THOSE 2 PREVIOUS APPROVE AS.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE, LAURA. >> 77504 OF THE RDC, DOES OUTLINE A 1 TO 1 CREDIT FOR PRESERVING PROTECTED TREES.

MEANING FOR EACH INCH THAT IS PRESERVED OF PROTECTED TREE THERE WOULD NOT BE MITIGATION FOR A COMPARABLE INCH OF PROTECTED TREE. THERE IS 112 INCH PINE TREE THAT IS BEING PRESERVED TOWARDS THE WEST OF THE SITE, OR THE NORTHWEST OF THE SITE OR SO. SO THAT WOULD BE LEAVING 62 INCHES OF REQUIRED MITIGATION. AND YOU CAN SEE THOSE NUMBERS BREAK DOWN THERE. TOTAL CALIPER INCHES 98 OF THOSE, 86 ARE PROTECTING, 27 REMOVED, AND 12 PRESERVED.

[00:15:01]

NEXT SLIDE, LAURA. IN LIEU OF REPLACING PLANTING TREES ON SITE. THE APPLICANT HAS CHOSEN TO PAY INTO THE REFORESTATION FUND. JUST A REMINDER, THAT FEE IS 121 TOLLS AND $0.67 PER PROTECTED CALIPER INCH, THE 62 CALIPER INCHES RESULT IN $7,543.65 INTO THE REFORESTATION FUND.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE LAURA. WITH THAT STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REMOVAL PERMIT MITIGATION PLAN OF.

THE TREES REQUESTED FOR REMOVAL ARE TO ACCOMMODATE A DEVELOPMENT THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE APPROVED ZONING CONCEPT PLAN FROM COUNCIL AND THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH THE STAFF.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. AND I WILL DO MY BEST TO ANSWER

ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE. >> AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE, SAM MANY LAWRENCE HE'S ALSO AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.

>> I HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF. >> YES, JOHN.

YOU ARE MUTED. >> I'M SORRY, MY QUESTION IS

GOING TO BE FOR THE APPLICANT. >> GO AHEAD.

>> I AM CURIOUS, MR. LAWRENCE, WHY NOT TRY TO PUT -- WHY NOT TRY TO REPLANT SOME TREES, RATHER THAN JUST PAYING INTO THE

FUND? >> FAIR QUESTION, MR. COTE, AND THANK YOU ALL FOR TAKING THE TIME TONIGHT.

BUT THIS SITE IS VERY SMALL. IT'S UNDER 2 ACRES, AND THE SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT WE ARE PUTTING ON THIS SITE BASED ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT'S BEEN APPROVED REALLY DOESN'T ALLOW FOR THE PLANTING OF TREES BECAUSE WE HAVE PLANTED ALL ALONG THE OUTSIDE BOUNDARIES WITH THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS AND WE HAVE QUITE A BIT OF SLOPE IN THE AREA.

SO IT'S REALLY WE WOULD JUST PREFER TO PAY INTO IT BECAUSE WE ARE PLANTING QUITE A FEW TREES ONSTE, BASED ON OUR ORIGINAL

LANDSCAPING OF THE PROPERTY. >> THANK YOU.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ANYBODY FOR STAFF OR FOR THE APPLICANT?

>> THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING. SO WE ARE NOW READY FOR A MOTION. HE MR. ENGEN.

>> I WOULD LIKE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE TREE PERMIT.

>> OKAY. >> WE'VE MOTION TO APPROVE FOR MR. ENGEN. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? WE HAVE A SECOND FROM MR. ENTROP.

EVERYONE IN FAVOR OF APPROVAL PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.

THAT'S A YES FOR ENTROP, BE, ESTEVEZ, SEGARS, COTE WINTON AND SWIFT. THAT'S 100 PERCENT PERCENT THAT

ITEM PASSES. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THE EVENING. I APPRECIATE Y'ALL TAKING TIME

FOR US. >> THANK YOU, SIR.

>> WE ARE MOVING TO ITEM 5 C, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND

[5C. Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation to City Council on an a request by Adam Shiffer, Skorburg Company, on behalf of property owner Cornerstone Assembly of God, to rezone the subject property from Single-Family Residential (SF-10) District and Limited Office (O-1) District to Planned Development (PD) District for Single-Family Residential (SF-5) Uses and approval of a Concept Plan to develop 99 single-family homes. The approximately 21.74-acre site is located in the William Crabtree Abstract, west of Dalrock Road and approximately 750 feet south of Schrade Road, in the City of Rowlett, Dallas County, Texas.]

>> JUST A RECAP YOU OF WHAT WAS JUST READ.

THIS IS A REZONING APPLICATION, TO CHANGE THE ZONING FROM A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, HE 10 DISTRICT, AND 0-1 DISTRICT, TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR SINGLE SF5 USES FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING 99 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, AND 4 COMMON AREA CAR LOTS. AGAIN.

U 16 AND A HALF ACRES OF S F-10 MANY DISTRICT, AND THE REMAINING 5.2 OR SO OF LIMITED OFFICE ROAD ALONG DALROCK.

>> A LITTLE BACKGROUND ON THIS SUBMITTAL OR ON THIS PROJECT IN

[00:20:02]

THE APPLICANT CAME FORWARD IN NOVEMBER OF LAST YEAR, JUST AFTER THAT. AND RECEIVED A RECOMMENDATION OF DENIAL 4-3, AND THAT APPLICATION WAS WITHDRAWN.

THE OUTCOME IS NOW RETURNED THIS EVENING WITH A REVISED REQUEST TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION SOME OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING AND STAFF CONCERNS FROM THAT NOVEMBER MEETING SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO SETBACKS, AND CONDITIONS WITH NO 4 FOOT RECESS, A WEEK BE GETTING INTO THAT A LITTLE BIT LATER.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE, LAURA. FIRST WE WILL TALK ABOUT THE SITE. CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED THERE IS A RECREATIONAL FIELD OF SORTS TO THE NORTHWEST.

JUST OVER 200 -- 227 FEET OF FRONTAGE ALONG DALROCK ROAD.

>> AND THERE ARE SEVERAL MATURE TREE STANDS ALONG CAN DALROCK,

ROAD. >> WITH THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.

>> SITE ACCESS, SPEAING OF THE CURB THERE.

>> IT DOES CLASSIFY DALROCK AS A 6 LANE DIVIDED ROAD WITH A 110 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY.

THAT 110 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY DOES EXIST, IT'S ONLY 4 LANES AT THIS TIME. THERE ARE NO DESIGN PLANS OR ALLOCATED FUNDING FOR THOSE IMPROVEMENTS QUITE YET.

AT THE TIME OF THE DEVELOPED PLAN REVIEW.

WE WILL BE TAKING A LOOK ALT A FULL TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS, A TIA, TO DECIDE WHETHER THERE WILL BE A DEDICATED NORTHBOUND TURN LANE IN THAT MEDIAN. AGAIN, THAT'S FOR LATER ON DURING THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW.

THE CONCEPT THAT'S PROPOSED DOES PROPOSE 2 MEANS OF INGRESS, AND HE GRESSION ON DALROCK ROAD, 1 WOULD BE AT WATERS WAY, WHICH IS AT THAT CURRENT MEDIAN BREAK, AND ANOTHER WOULD BE THE PROPOSED CORNERSTONE DRIVE TO THE SOUTHERN ACCESS THERE WHICH WILL ONLY ALLOW FOR A RIGHDE IN RIDE OUT CONDITION.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE THERE. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

>> CAN EVERYBODY STILL HEAR ME? >> YES, WE CAN HEAR YOU.

>> THERE WE GO. THANKS LAURA I AM GOING TO CALL ON JEFF COHEN WITH OUR ASSISTANT CITY NEAR ENGINEER TO SEE IF HE CAN SPEAK ABOUT THE DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS.

>>. >>

>> GOOD SPEAK ABOUT THE DRAINAG CONSIDERATIONS.

> >> GOOD EVENING.

, COMMISSION, I JUST WANT TO HIGHLIGHT SOME OF THE DRAINAGE CONSIDERATIONS. I THINK THAT YOU HAVE ALL SEEN THIS BEFORE. BUT LET ME GO THROUGH THESE HIGHLIGHTS WE HAVE A LOT OF EXISTING STORM SHALL WATER INFRAARE STRUCTURE ON DALROCK ROAD.

THEY HAVE PLANNED ACCORDINGLY WITH MULTIPLE STUBBOUTS TO THIS PROPERTY IN VARIOUS POINTS. THAT STORM WATER SYSTEM DISCHARGES DIRECTLY LAKE RAY HUBBARD WHICH IS ON THE EAST

SIDE OF IT DALROCK ROAD THERE. >> THE AS-BUILT RECORDS DO SHOW THAT THE EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE HAS THE CAPACITY TO SAFELY PASS THE ESTIMATED RUNOFF FROM THIS PROPERTY AS WELL AS THE CHURCH PROPERTY THAT IT IS TIED TO, IN ADDITION TO ALL OF THE FLOWS

[00:25:03]

CONNOR NOW. >> THANK YOU, ARE JEFF.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE, LAURA. >> LOOKING AT THE PROPERTY UNDER ITS CURRENT ZONING. AS WE SPOKE ABOUT EARLIER, IT IS SPLIT BETWEEN SF-10, AND 01, THE SF-10 IS TO ACCOMMODATE A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.

THE 01 DISTRICT IS TO ACCOMMODATE LOW INTENSITY OFFICE USES THAT ARE MORE COMPLIMENTARY TO THE RESIDENTIAL SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT, AND DO NOT JEOPARDIZE THEM.

IT IS CURRENTLY VACANT. IT IS NOT DEVELOPED UNDER THESE STANDARDS. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE, LAURA.

>> OF AS IS TYPICAL, WE DO LOOK AT THE SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN WHEN LOOKING AT ZONING CASES.

BEAR WITH ME WITH THIS SLIDE. I THOUGHT IT WAS A TEXT.

WE ARE LOOKING AT EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS ON THE WEST SOUTH AND EAST PORTIONS.

THE WESTERN AND SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENTS WERE ESTABLISHED UNDER THE 1981 DEVELOPMENT CODE. THOSE ARE PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES.

>> THE SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT TO THE EAST ACROSS DALROCK ROAD IS A STRAIGHT ZONING SF-10 DISTRICT.

TO THE NORTH THERE ARE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS.

HOWEVER THEY ARE OCCUPIED BY SOME YOU NONRESIDENTIAL USE US, THE FIRE STATION. THERE IS A DAY CARE.

AND THE EXISTING CORNERSTONE ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH AS WELL.

SOME MULTIFAMILY USES AND THE LET MADE HE WERE OF THE VACANT LAND THAT IS CARVED OUT OF THIS LARGER PARCEL LEFT ASIDE FROM THIS ZONING CASE, WILL BE SOME SF-10 ZONING DISTRICT, AND O-1 ZONING DISTRICT. THERE IS CURRENTLY A CONDITIONALLY APPROVED PLAN FOR A NEW CORNERSTONE ASSEMBLY OF

GOD BUILDING THERE. >> NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE, LAURA.

>> MOVING WITH THE COMPATIBILITY ANALYSES, WE DO LOOK AT SURROUNDING ZONING REQUIREMENTS. YOU WILL NOTE THAT THE SURROUNDING MINIMUM LOT AREA REQUIREMENTS TO THE NORTHEAST AND SOUTH, THAT WOULD BE SF-TENS, AND 1 OF THE FOR PD, FOR THE 191 CODE DO REQUIRE MINIMUM LOT SIZES OF 10,000 SQUARE FEET. THIS DOES EXCEED THIS PROPOSAL WHICH HAS A RANGE OF 6,000 TO 7200 MINIMUMS. I WILL BE DIVING INTO THAT A HILL BIT AS WELL.

THAT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE PROPERTY WEST WHICH DOES HAVE A MINIMUM LOT AREA OF 7200 SQUARE FEET E LOOKING AT THE MINIMUM BUILDING AREA REQUIREMENTS. THE IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS TO THE SOUTH AND WEST DO CLOCK IN UNDERNEATH THE PROPOSED ZONING STANDARD FOR BUILDING AREA, WHICH IS AN 1850 TO 2,000 RANGE. DEPENDING ON THE LOT TYPE.

WHICH AGAIN I WILL JOB INTO THAT A LITTLE BIT LATER.

>> WRITTEN THERE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SCREEN, YOU WILL NOTICE THE MINIMUM ZONING REQUIREMENTS AND THE BUILT REQUIREMENT OFTEN DO DIFFER. AS SO WE'VE JUMPED IN, AND CALCULATED WHAT THAT HAS DEVELOPED OUT AS THOSE PROPERTIES IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THOSE DEVELOPMENTS IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT. THE PROPOSED MINIMUM LOT AREA RANGE OF 6,000 TO 7200 SQUARE FEET FOR THIS PROPOSAL WILL ULTIMATELY RESULT IN AN AVERAGE THAT IS LESS THAN THE BUILT AVERAGE TO THE SOUTH, EAST AND WEST.

YOU CAN SEE THOSE AVERAGES THERE.

MAJORITY OF THIS PROPOSAL IS 6,000 SQUARE FEET MINIMUMS. THE PROPOSED MINIMUM DWELLING AREA OF 1850 TO 2,000 IS ALSO LESS THAN THE AVERAGE BUILT AREA.

DO KEEP IN MIND THAT THOSE ARE MINIMUMS.

[00:30:03]

>> THIS SLIDE JUST SORT OF REITERATING WHAT WE WERE SPEAKING OF IN THE LAST SLIDE. 78 LOTS OF THESE PROPOSED 99 WILL HAVE A MINIMUM ZONING REQUIREMENT OF 6,000 SQUARE FEET AND DWELLING SIZES OF EITHER THE 1850 OR THE 2,000.

THE REMAINING 21 LOTS WHICH GENERALLY DO ABUT THE WEST AND SOUTH WILL HAVE A MINIMUM LOT SIZE OF 7200 SQUARE FEET.

HOMES NO LESS THAN 2,000 SQUARE FEET.

THAT MECHANISM AND A KEEPING THOSE 7200 SQUARE FOOT LOTS TO THE WEST AND SOUTH WHICH WE WILL DSCUSS A LITTLE BIT LATER IN A COUPLE OF SLIDES WOULD PROVIDE A COMPLIMENTARY LOT AND HOME SIZE IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS.

AGAIN, THERE TO THE SOUTH AND WEST.

AND PROVIDE A BUFFER OF SORTS TO THE REST OF THE PROPOSED 6,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT A OF COURSE WE DO LOOK AT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE REZONING CASE. THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DOES DESIGNATE THE MAJORITY OF THIS PROPERTY AS LOW DENSITY I RESIDENTIAL. THOSE ARE LOTS DEFINED BETWEEN 7,020,000 SQUARE FEET. THERE IS A PIECE OF THIS PROPERTY UP ALONG DALROCK THAT HAS A MULTIFAMILY DESIGNATION IN THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN. IT IS BELIEVED THAT THAT IS A REMNANT OF A PROPOSAL THAT NEVER CAME TO FRUITION.

BUT NONETHELESS IT IS THE DESTINATION THAT WE HAVE FOR THE PROPERTY. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AGAIN HAS A RANGE OF LOT SIZES FROM 6,000 -- SOME BEING 6,000 MINIMUM, AND SOME BEING 7200 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM.

THAT 7200 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM, DOES MEET THE RESIDENTIAL LAND USE. THE REMAINDER 6,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS WOULD FALL UNDERNEATH THAT. AND WHILE THOSE REMAINDER LOTS ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN, THE PROPOSED MEDIUM DENSITY I IS CONCENTRATED AWAY FROM THE EXISTING SURROUNDING LOW DENSITY I AND IS SEPARATED BY THESE -- BY THAT LOW DENSITY I. LIKEWISE, IT IS NOT BELIEVED THAT THOSE MEDIUM DENSITY I LOTS WILL DETRACT FROM ANY OF THE EXISTING NONRESIDENTIAL USES TO THE NORTH.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA. TAKING A DIVE INTO THE CONCEPT PLAN NOW ARES YOU WILL SEE WHAT I WAS SPEAKING ABOUT EARLIER WITH THE 78, 6,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS THERE.

WE DEFINE THEM AS TYPE A LOTS. THEY ARE IN THAT YELLOW, AND THE 21 TYPE B LOTS IN PURPLE THAT DO HUG THAT WESTERN AND SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE SERVING AS THAT KIND OF BUFFER.

TYPE A LOTS, THE MAJORITY OF LOTS IN THIS PROJECT DO HAVE THAT 6,000 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM. THERE WILL BE 35 PERCENT OF THOSE OF THAT 78, SO 28 MINIMUM, WILL BE 2,000 SQUARE FOOT HOMES.

THE REMAINDER WILL BE 1,850 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUMS. AND THE GARAGE CONFIGURATION ON THESE IS FRONT ENTRY THERE IS NO J-HOOK ESTABLISHED. WE WILL DIVE INTO THAT A LITTLE BIT LATER ON. THE TYPE B LOTS IN PURPLE.

>> THOSE 7200 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM LOTS WILL HAVE 2,000 SQUARE FOOT DWELLING AREAS AND A 2 IN 1 GARAGE APPROACH CONFIGURATION. WHAT THAT MEANS IS THAT 1 DOOR,ING THE LONE 1 DOOR WILL FACE THE STREET WHILE THE OTHER 2 WILL NASA WAY FROM THE STREET. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE, LAURA.

>> THERE ARE 4 COMMON AREA ARE LOTS.

HAD THAT THE HOA, MAINTAINS. >> THEY COME WITH WHAT YOU SEE ON THE SCREEN HERE. THE NORTHWESTERN LOT HAS A PLAYGROUND WITH SOME PICNIC TABLES.

THE COMMUNITY GARDEN AND ENCLOSED DOG PARK ARE LOCATED ALONG 2 LOTS ALONG DALROCK ROAD. THERE'S ALSO A PEDESTRIAN TRAIL THERE THAT CONNECTS TO THE SIDEWALK NETWORK TO DALROCK ROCK, THERE'S A GAZEBO, AND SORT OF A CONNECT OR PATH IN THE CENTRAL BLOCK THAT'S NOT PICTURED ON SCREEN HERE ON THE FOURTH COMMON AREA LOT. THE NEXT SLIDE PLEASE LAURA.

>>. JUST A QUICK CONSIDERATION ON THESE FRONT OPEN HE SPACE LOTS. THERE IS AN EXTENSION OF 1 OF

[00:35:02]

5-ISH FEET WIDE. A REMNANT OF A PAST TRIAL ON A PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE EXTENSION EITHER BE INCREASED TO INCREASE ITS FUNCTIONALITY OR REMOVED IN ORDER TO PREVENT WHAT IS CURRENTLY A TUNNEL LIKE CONDITION WHICH COULD POSE MAINTENANCE ISSUES IN THE FUTURE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA.

>> JUST A QUICK COMPARISON OF THE DIM ITENTIONAL REQUIREMENTS.

WE HAVE AT 10, THE EXISTING ZONING FOR THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTY SF-5, AND THEN THE REQUESTED PD.

YOU WILL SEE THAT THE- BOTH TYPE A AND B LOTS DO EXCEED THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE IN THE SF-5 DISTRICT, AS WELL AS THE LOT DEPTH NUMBERS THEREOF 120 FEET. THE FRONT SETBACK DUE TO THE REQUESTED ALLEY WAIVER IS ALSO A MUCH LARGER 1, WHERE WE WOULD SEE THAT MADE UP IS IN THE REAR SETBACK, WHERE THE MINIMUM SF-5 STANDARD IS 25 AND FOR THESE WE ARE LOOKING AT 15 FEET IN THE REAR. THE STANDARD IS NOT COMPLIED WITH IN THE PD, WOULD COME PLAY WITH THE BASE SEASONING.

AND THAT'S WHY WE IMPLEMENT BASE SEASONINGS.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASES, LAURA >> BEAR WITH ME AS I READ THESE OUT. THIS APPLICATION DOES COME WITH SOME RESIDENTIAL VARIANCES WITH IT.

THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING TO ELIMINATE THE ALLEY REQUIREMENTS, AND PROVIDE NO RECESS FOR FRONT ENTRY A

GARAGES. >> THEY ARE LOOKING TO PROVIDE FRONT ENTRY GARAGES WITHOUT HOOK APPROACHES, ON THOSE TYPE A LOTS, ARE THEY ARE LOOKING TO DECREASE THE RIFE OF WAY WIDTH FROM 60 FEET TO 50 FEET. THEY ARE LOOKING TOEE LIMBINATE THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ENTRY WAY AREAS IN LIEU OF THOSE OPEN SPACE LOTS ALONG DALROCK ROCAD, LOOKING TO DECREASE THE MINIMUM REAR SETBACK FROM 25 TO 15 FEET, AND INCREASE THE BUILDING HEIGHT FROM 36 FEET TO 2 AND A HALF STORIES.

>> WE WILL DIVE INTO THESE VERIATIONS IN ORDER THERE.

THE QUESTION FOR THE ALLEY REQUIREMENT WAIVER, AND PROVIDE FRONT LOADED GARAGES WITH NO RECESS, AND THAT NOT USE THE HOOK APPROACH. LIK LIKEWISE, THEY DO PROVIDE PARKING ALTERNATIVES IN ORDER TO PREVENT CARS FROM AT LEAST GIVING THE ALTERNATIVE TO CARS PARKING ON THE PUBLIC STREET. LIKEWISE THEY DO TYPICALLY PUSH BUILDINGS CLOSER TO THAT SIDEWALK WHICH DOES ENCOURAGE PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY AND WALKABILITY.

AND YOU ALREADY SEE WHEN THOSE FRONT ENTRY PRODUCTS ARE ALLOWED, THE LRJ, HOOK APPROACHES, AND THEY PROVIDE MORE THAN 20 FOOT OF THE FACADE, THE 20 FOOT IS REQUIRED.

>> J-HOOK IS REQUIRED FOR HE HAVE 21 PERCENT OF THE LOT DISTRIBUTION, UNIVERSAL J-HOOKS WOULD PROVIDE MORE OFFSTREET PARKING AREA. HOWEVER WHEN IT COMES TO THE RECESS, THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED A 25 FOOT FRONT SETBACK, THAT'S AN INCREASE FROM THE PREVIOUS PROPOSAL IN ORDER TO MITIGATE THAT 4-FOOT RECESS, ESSENTIALLY GIVING A DEEPER FRONT SETBACK AN ADDITIONAL 5 FEET TO PROVIDE THAT EXTRA AREA FOR CARS TO GET OFF THE STREET. WE DO FEEL THAT THAT MEETS THE INDEADED RDC, AS FAR AS THE RECESS IS CONCERNED.

>> DECREASING THE RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH FROM 60 FEET TO 50 FEET.

THE INTENTION OF A 6 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY IS TO PROVIDE AMPLE SPACE FOR UTILITY PLACEMENT BEYOND THE PAVEMENT, AS WELL AS FREE OF SOME SPACE FOR AUTOMOBILE CIRCULATION, AND EMERGENCY ACCESS. DURING THE REVIEW OF THIS PROPOSAL WITH THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE, SO THAT INCLUDES OURSELVES AND FIRE AS WELL AS PUBLIC WORKS, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE COMBINATION OF THE DENSITY /*, AND THE

[00:40:01]

ACCESS. >> AND IT'S WORTH NOTING THAT THE PAVEMENT WIDTH THAT COMES WITH BOTH THE 50 AND 60 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY IS STILL 31 FEET. SO THERE WERE -- SO FIRE FELT

THERE WAS SUFFICIENT ACCESS. >> NEXT SLIDE.

>> THE APPLICANT SEEKING TO ELIMINATE THE SECONDARY AND PRIMARY AREAS, ON DALROCK ROCK. THE FUNCTION OF AENT TRAY WANETTE URE IS 2 FOLD, IT PROVIDES A VISUAL AMENITY TO EXISTING COMMUNITIES, ARE AS WELL AS PROVIDING AN ACTUAL PHYSICAL DISTANCE FROM THE EXTERNAL STREET.

IN THIS CASE DALROCK ROAD HE REMEMBER A PROJECTED 6-LANE THOROUGHFARE. THE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF THOSE ENTRY WANETTURES ARE PRESENTED IN THESE IMAGES ON THE LOWER PART OF YOUR SCREEN. THE PRIMARY ENTRY WAY AREA, 80 FEET IN DEPTH. 40 FEET IN WIDTH WITH AN ADDITIONAL AREAS HE THAT YOU SEE IN BLUE THERE TOWARDS THE LEFT AND THEN THE SECONDARY JUST SIMPLY WITHOUT THOSE ADDITIONAL BLUE AREAS ON THE RIGHT. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA.

>> THE APPLICANT IS NOT PROVIDING THE ENTRY WANETTURES AT LEAST DIMENSIONALLY THAT 80 BY 40 FEET.

HOWEVER THEY ARE PROPOSING ACTIVE OPEN SPACE THERE ALONG DALROCK ROAD. WITH TIES TO THE TRAILS, AND COMMUNITY GARDEN. THE PRIMARY ENTRYWAY THERE, WITH WATERWAY, THE INTENT IS MET WITH THE AMPLE SPACE THAT IS PROVIDED. IT IS STILL RECOMMENDED THAT THERE BE FURTHER LANDSCAPE OR HARD ESCAPE TREATMENTS ALONG THE THE INTENT OF VISUAL AMENITIES FOR SECONDARY ENTRYWANETTY FEAT.

NEXT, THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED SETBACK FROM 50 FEET TO 25 FEET. THAT IS THE PREVIOUS SETBACK THAT WAS BROUGHT TO YOU OF NOVEMBER LAST YEAR, OF 10 FEET.

WHENEVER ALLEY WAIVERS ARE GRANTED.

THAT THE 15 FOOT OR THE FULL REAR SETBACK IS DEDICATED TO THE BACKYARD. THAT IS AREA THAT WOULD NOT PREVIOUSLY BE ALLOWED OR FULLY RESERVED UNDER THE SF-5 REQUIREMENTS WHICH IS INTENDED TO ACCOMMODATE AN ALLEY.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE LAURA. >>ES AND THAT THAT IS DEVIATION, INCREASING THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT TO 36 FEET OR 25 -- OR 2.5 STORIES RATHER. THAT IS JUST TO ACCOMMODATE THE APPLICANT'S PRODUCT THAT THEY PROVIDE U IT'S NOT SUSPECTED TO CREATE ANY NOTABLE DIFFERENCE HE OR JEOPARDIZE ANY SURROUNDING BUILT ENVIRONMENT. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA.

>> SO WHEN LOOKING AT THE INTENT OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMNT DISTRICT. THE RELEVANTCODE DOES DESCRIBE THAT THE PD'S, ARE INTENDED TO CREATE A HIGHER QUALITY DEVELOPMENT THAT IS POSSIBLE WITH A STANDARD ZONING DISTRICT.

HIGHER QUALITY DEVELOPMENTS SHOULD HAVE SOME OF THE FOLLOWING CHARACTERISTICS THAT YOU SEE ON SCREEN.

THAT THE WOULD BE ACCESSIBLE CENTRAL LICENSED, MINUTE ADVERTISED AREAS, WITH PASSIVE OPEN SPACE, AS WELL AS SPACE FOR CONGREGATION. HIGHER QUALITY DEVELOPMENTS INTRODUCES THE INTEGRATION OF DIFFERENT USES AND LOT SIZES AND BUILDING TYPES THAT ENCOURAGE INVESTMENT FROM INDIVIDUALS FROM ALL DIFFERENT ECONOMIC I CAN SITUATIONS AND STAGES IN THEIR A WELL AS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE STANDARDS. THIS IS TO NOT MANY ON PREVENT NEGATIVE IMPACT ON SURROUNDING BUILT ENVIRONMENT, BUT ALSO THE SURROUNDING NATURAL ENVIRONMENT. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

>> MOVING INTO OUR SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOODS.

WHEN WE LOOK TO DEFINE THE SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOODS.

WE LOOK TOWARDS OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

IT IS TO INCORPORATE A MIX OF HOUSING TYPES TO COMPLETE A COMPLETE NEIGHBORHOOD. 1 THAT WILL OUTLAST US ALL HOPEFULLY AT A CONFIGURATION OF DIFFERENT LOT SHAPES, AND ADS DIVERSITY TO THE COMMUNITY. SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOODS DO

[00:45:02]

IT DOES PROVIDE THAT VARIATION IN LOT SIZE AND UNIT SIZE.

DWELLING UNIT SIZE. >> NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA.

>> THE PROPOSED COMMUNITY OPEN SPACES ARE SITUATED WITHIN THE CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE HOMES IN THE DEVELOPMENT.

THEY ARE SET UP SO TO BOTH BE PASSIVE AND ENCOURAGE CONGREGATION OF THE RESIDENTS. LOTS ABUTTING THE EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, THIS WOULD BE BE THE TYPE B LOTS ARE SHOWN TO BE A MINUTE MILLION OF 7200 SQUARE FEET.

AN AREA WITH HOMES AT LEAST 2,000 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE.

THIS DOES MAKE THEM MORE COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN GOING BACK TO SUSTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOODS BEING A PARTNERSHIP OR A PARTNER TO SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT.

WITH THAT, THIS PROPOSAL IS IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE STRATEGIC PLAN, , THE COMP PLAN, AND THE INTENT OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS WITHIN THE RDC, AS THE ATTENTION TO OPEN SPACE COMMUNITIES IS SUBSTANTIAL, AND IT REQUIRES A HIGHER QUALITY DEVELOPMENT AND SEEKS TO STRENGTHSEN NEIGHBORHOOD LIVEABILITY. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA.

>> THEORY ARE SOME PHOTOS OF THE RATHER EXTENSIVE EXISTING TREE STANDS. THIS WILL BE IN THE BALLPARK OF THE PRIMARY FEATURE NORTH OF THE HE CEMETERY.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE, LAURA >> HERE WOULD BE AN IMAGE OF THE PROPERTY FROM THE WEST AND EXISTING ALLEYWAY THERE.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE, LAURA. >> AND HERE IS THAT EXISTING SPORTS FIELD THAT WOULD BE TO THE NORTH OF US, TO THE PROPERTY. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA.

>> PUBLIC NOTIFICATION WAS MAILED ON JANUARY 25TH OF THIS YEAR. WE MAILED 66, 200 FOOT NOTICES AND 97500 FOOT NOTICES. RESPONSES TO THE 200 FOOT NOTICE AREA, THERE WERE 5 IN OPPOSITION, AND 3 IN FAVOR.

THE 500 FOOT COURTESY NOTICE AREA, WE RECEIVED ON 4 IN OPPOSITION, BUT WE WANTED TO NOTE THAT THERE THAT RESPONSES IN OPPOSITION TO THIS REQUEST DO EXPRESS CONCERNS RATHER REGARDING THE REQUESTED DENSITY I.

THERE'S A PERCEIVED RISK TO NEIGHBORING PROPERTY VALUES AND FUTURE TRAFFIC IMPLICATIONS ALONG DALROCK ROAD.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA. >> STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROJECT FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SF-10 DISTRICT, TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PD, DISTRICT FOR SINGLE FAMILY USES AS PRESENTED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. THAT THE OPEN SPACE AMENITIES AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDE YOU HAD IN THE GENERAL LOCATION AND SPECIFIC QUANTITIES WITH THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS. FURTHER LANDSCAPE AND HARDESCAPE TREATMENTS BE UTILIZED ALONG THE ON SOUTHERN ENTRY WAY, AND THAT NARROW CORRIDOR OF OPEN SPACE, AND LOT B, TO ALLOW MORE OPEN SPACE AMENITY OR TO ELIMINATE IT ALL TOGETHER, AND THAT THE TREE SURVEY PRESERVATION PLAN DOES SHOW THE TREE MASSES IN THE OPEN SPACES AS RESERVED ALONG DALROCK ROAD.

THE PROPOSED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WITH THE CONDITIONS LISTED ABOVE IS BELIEVED TO FOSTER ASSIST CONTAINABLE NEIGHBORHOOD CREATING A UNIQUE SENSE OF SPACE FOR PHYSICAL AND MENTAL WELLBEING, THEY HAVE PROVIDED A VARIETY OF AMENITIES, AND LOT CONFIGURATIONS THAT ARE BELIEVED TO BENEFIT BOTH THE PROPOSED COMMUNITY AND THE CITY AS A WHOLE.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA. >> WITH THAT, I WILL DO MY BEST TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.

>> COMMISSIONERS, QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.

MR. ENGEN. >> YEAH, HI.

THANK YOU CONNOR FOR THAT PRESENTATION I AM STILL STRUGGLING WITH -- WE'VE HAD 3 MEETINGS ABOUT THIS, AND A LOT OF THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE TALKED OF TALKED ABOUT HERE WE ARE AT SF-10, GOING TO SF-5. THERE WAS A LOT OF AGREEMENT I THINK AT THE LAST MEETING OF WHY DON'T WE LOOK AT GOING WITH YOU

[00:50:03]

AND I DON'T THINK- WE DO HAVE SOME THAT ARE INCLUDED ON THE OUTSKIRTS H 1 OF THE OTHER CONCERNS THAT WE HAD WAS THE NUMBER OF HOMES IN THAT AREA. SO WE ARE TRYING TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF VEHICLES THAT WOULD BE GOING IN AND OUT OF THAT AREA AND TRYING TO MAKE LITTLE BIT LARGER HOMES ON BIGGER LOTS THERE. SO I STILL HAVE GOT SOME CONCERNS THAT WE HAVE NOT MET. I KNOW THAT YOU SAID IN THE BEGINNING THAT THE DEVELOPER WAS WORKING WITH STAFF ON RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE PAST, BUT IT WAS NEVER STILL ADDRESSED WITH THE SQUARE FOOT OF THE LOTS.

>> IT'S JUST A CONCERN. >> CAN YOU COMMENT ON THAT MR.

ROBERTS. >> YES, MA'AM.

THAT IS CORRECT, THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THAT AND THE MIDDLE WOULD YOU BE THE 4-FOOT RECESS WHICH WAS A CONDITION IN STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION ON THE LAST PROJECT AS WELL AS THE REAR YARD SETBACK. THAT IS CORRECT, MR., E ENGEN, THERE IS NO REDUCTION, THE APPLICANT HAS NOT ACCOMMODATED

THAT REDUCTION. >> I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU,

MR. ROBERTS. >> YES, MA'AM.

>> WE'VE LOOKED AT THIS SO MANY TIMES, AND TALKED ABOUT SO MANY

MANY DIFFERENT THINGS. >> CAN YOU JUST KIND OF, IN A QUICK BULLETED LIST TELL ME WHAT THEY DID DO SINCE THE LATEST SUBMITTAL TO GET US CLOSER TO WHERE WE NEEDED OVER WANTED TO

BE? >> YES, MA'AM.

FROM THE NOVEMBER SUBMITTAL OF LAST YEAR, THAT WOULD BE THE

MOST RECENT 1 >> RIGHT.

I KNOW THAT THE 4-FOOT RECESS IS IN THERE, AND THE 15-FOOT REAR YARDS. BUT WHAT ELSE?

>> THERE WAS A REWORKING OF THAT FRONT ENTRY AREA.

THE PEDESTRIAN TRAIL IS NOW MOVING ON TO DALROCK ROAD, AND APRIL SIDE FROM THE 4 FOOT RECESS BEING ACCOMMODATED BY THE DEEPER BROAD SETBACK OF 25 FEET AND THAT REAR SETBACK INCREASING TO 15 FEET, I DO BELIEVE THAT THOSE ARE THE DIFFERENCES.

>> AND WERE THERE ANY J-HOOK LOTS ON THAT PRIOR SUBMITTAL OF?

>> YES. >> FOR NOVEMBER?

>> YES, MA'AM. >> THERE WERE?

>> YES, THE TYPE B LOTS TO THE WEST AND SOUTH DID COME WITH

THAT, YES, MA'AM. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?

MANY. >> MR. ENTROP?

>> YES, I HAVE SOME QUESTIONS, JUST A COUPLE OF GENERAL COMMENTS. THE FIRST THING THAT I HAVE CONCERNS OVER SPECIFICALLY, GOING FROM SF-10, AND REDUCING IT DOWN TO THE SMALLER LOT SIZES, THAT IS 1 CONCERN.

ALONG WITH THAT, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT A LOT OF DIFFERENT CHANGES. REMOVING THE J-HOOKS, AND THE FRONT ENTRY GARAGES. THE PRIMARY QUESTION THAT I HAVE AT THIS TIME IS HOW LONG ARE THE DRIVEWAYS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT? AND I AM ASKING THIS BECAUSE THEY ARE ALSO ASKING FOR THE ROADS TO BE FROM 60 FOOT TO 50 FOOT.

I BELIEVE THAT WAS THE- THAT I AM USING THE RIGHT NUMBERS HERE I AM WONDERING WILL CARS BE ABLE TO PARK IN THE DRIVEWAY UNDER

THE CURRENT DESIGN? >> THE EXTRA EXTENSION OF 5 FEET FROM THE PREVWERE YOUS SUBMITTAL DOES ALLOW FOR THE BUILDING TO SIT 25 FEET BACK ON THE LOT. SO THAT ESSENTIALLY GIVES US 25 FEET OF PAVEMENT ON THE PROPERTY.

THERE IS TYPICALLY A LITTLE BIT OF WIGGLE ROOM AFTER THE SIDEWALK, AND FOR REFERENCE, A TYPICAL PARKING SPOT IS ABOUT 20 FEET DEEP. SO ACCOMMODATING -- THERE ARE LARGER CARS, THAT IS FOR CERTAIN.

BUT THEY DO ACCOMMODATE WHAT WOULD BE IN EXCESS OF A STANDARD PARKING SPACE. J-HOOK CONDITIONS DO ALLOW FOR MORE TURNING AND THERE'S A LITTLE BIT MORE PAVEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THOSE AS WELL FOR THOSE J-HOOK CONDITIONS TO KEEP THEM OFF THE STREET, AND OUT OF THAT PEDESTRIAN REALM.

>> SO 25 FEET IS ACTUALLY IN THE AREA THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE THE SIDEWALK. SO THE CARS PARKING INSIDE THAT 25 FOOT PARKING SPACE ARE NOT GOING TO BE HANGING OVER AND IMPEDING THE SIDEWALK; IS THAT CORRECT?

>> THAT'S CORRECT. ASSUMING THAT THEY CAN FIT WITHIN THAT 25 FEET. THAT IS 25 FETASESSED AFTER THE RIGHT OF WAY. SO THAT WOULD BE THE PROPERTY,

[00:55:01]

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? >> MR. WINTON, YES, SIR.

>> I'VE GOT A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS HERE.

SO FIRST OF ALL, PROBABLY IT'S IMPORTANT TO THE KIDS.

WHAT'S THE IMPACT SHOULD THIS PASS AND THEY DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY, WHAT HE'S THE IMPACT TO THE KIDS WHO CURRENTLY USE

THAT BALL FIELD? >> THAT FIELD WOULD BE GOING AWAY. TO MY KNOWLEDGE, IT IS ON THE CHURCH PROPERTY AND I WOULD ASSUME MAINTAINED BY THE CHURCH ACTUALLY AND NOT TOO CERTAIN. I CAN CERTAINLY CHECK.

THAT WOULD BE REMOVED. HE.

>> SO NEGATIVE IMPACT TO THE KIDS CURRENTLY BECAUSE I AM SURE THAT THEY USE IT QUITE FROM FREQUENTLI; IS WOULD THAT BE A

CORRECT ASSUMPTION? >> YES, SIR, IT WOULD BE REMOVED. SO ANYBODY IN USE OF THAT NOW IN THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT WOULD NO LONGER HAVE THAT TO

USE. >> THE OTHER THING TOO IS IT SEEMS LIKE WE HAVE DEVELOPMENTS THAT COME ACROSS THE PNZ, THAT IT APPEARS, BECAUSE I ONLY AND SEE THE ONES THAT COME ACROSS HERE. HOW MANY DEVELOPMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY, COULD BE MULTIFAMILY, COULD BE SINGLE-FAMILY ACTUALLY GO THROUGH AND GET DEVELOPED WITHOUT A ZONING REQUEST COMING FROM OF THE PNZ?

>> IT IS POSSIBLE, WE DO SEE IT DEVELOPERS, MEETING THE ZONING STANDARD. BOTH THE ZONING STANDARD REQUIREMENTS, AND THE OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF THE RDC, ALLEYS, THINGS LIKE THAT. THERE ARE ALLEY WAIVERS, AND MECHANISMS BOTH BRINGING IT BEFORE YOU OR PERHAPS THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS, THAT YOU INDIVIDUALS WOULD NOT BE SEEING.

BUT IT DOES HAPPEN. THERE ARE DEVELOP ES THAT DO

FOLLOW THE ZONING STANDARD. >> SO ON THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY. IF THE APPLICANT, BECAUSE THEY'VE BEEN BEFORE US 3 TIMES NOW.

>> YES, SIR >> SF-10 STANDARDS, WOULD THEY

BE ALLOWED TO DEVELOP PROPERTY? >> YES, ASSUMING THAT THE ZONING STANDARDS WERE MET AND ALL OTHER CODE CONDITIONS WERE MET, YES.

>> WITHOUT COMING BEFORE THE MANY PA

PZ? >> THE CORRECT.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS. JOHN, YOU ARE MUTED.

I THINK THAT WE NEED TOE CLARIFY THE LAST YOU RESPONSE.

BECAUSE IT WOULD ACTUALLY STILL HAVE TO COME IN FRONT OF PNZ, BECAUSE WE ARE TAKING A CHUNK OF SF-10, AND O-1, IT WOULD BE PART RESIDENTIAL AS WELL, RATHER THAN OFFICE ONLY.

>> ASSUMING THAT THEY ONLY ALMOST WENT ON THE SF-10

PORTIONS. >> FOR THIS PLOT, OR THIS TOTAL ACREAGE, THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME HERE TO CHANGE IT FROM O-1 TO

SF-10. >> IF THEY WANTED TO USE THAT FOR RESIDENTIAL ONLY ARES YES, SIR, ABSOLUTELY.

>> I'VE GOT A QUICK QUESTION HERE.

>> GO AHEAD, ROBERT. SURE.

>> AND I WAS TRYING TO LOOK THROUGH THE PRESENTATION.

WE'VE DETERMINED THAT THE FRONT SETBACKS ARE 25 FEET.

IS THAT JUST ON THE A TYPES, OR THE.

AN AND B TYPES. >> NO JUST THE A TYPES, THE B

TYPES ARE MANY STILL 20 FEET. >> THAT'S CORRECT, YES.

>> A THAT'S A STANDARD PARKING SIZE SPOT; IS THAT CORRECT?

>> YES, SIR. >> I'VE LEARNED SOMETHING TODAY,

THANK YOU. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? OKAY AND IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT, AND DOES HE WISH TO MAKE A PRESENTATION, AND IF YOU DO, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

>> YES, COMMISSIONER, MY NAME IS ADAM, WITH THE SKORBURG COMPANY.

I HAVE A PRESENTATION, THAT I WOULD APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY

TO PRESENT TO YOU TONIGHT. >> GO AHEAD SIR.

>> HE. >> THANK YOU, I AM ADAM, WITH WINDSOR HOMES, 8252 WESTCHESTER DRIVE.

[01:00:01]

THANK YOU FIRST OF OFF. IT IS THE THIRD TIME THAT WE'VE BEEN BEFORE YOU. BUT I HOPE THAT YOU WILL SEE TONIGHT THAT THIS WAS AN ARE VERY WELL YOU THOUGHT OUT PROJECT, AND VERY DETAILED PLANNING IN COLLABORATION WITH STAFF AND THE CORNERSTONE CHURCH.

>> SO IT'S REALLY A BABY OF ALL OF OURS THROUGH A LOT OF REFINEMENT AND VERY DETAILED PLANNING.

WITH THAT, NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. >> THE CONTENTS, WE WILL TALK QUICKLY ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WHICH WILL COVER THE LOCATION AND THE CURRENT ZONING AND THE FUTURE LAND USE AND WE WILL TALK ABOUT THE ZONING REQUEST AND SPECIFICALLY HOW WE ADDRESSED THE NOVEMBER 24TH PNZ COMMENTS THAT I HEARD LOUD AND CLEAR, AND CONNOR OBVIOUSLY TOUCHED ON SOME OF THOSE AND I WANTED TO GIVE YOU SOME ADDITIONAL CONTEXT FROM WHERE WE'VE BEEN COMING FROM ON THESE AND HOW THEY AT ISIFY THOSE CONCERNS OR WE HOPE THAT THEY WILL. AMENITIES, AND ACTIVE OPEN SPACE. ALL OF THESE CHANGES THAT WE HAVE BEEN DOING AND WORKING COLLABORATIVELY WITH THE CHURCH AND PROFESSIOAL STAFF. WE DID NOT COMPROMISE, OR GIVE IN, OR CUT BACK, OR CUT CORNERS WITH RESPECT TO ANYTHING.

IN FACT, WE'VE ONLY ADDED A TOUCH ON SOME OF THOSE THINGS THAT WILL ENSURE LONGEVITY AND HIGH QUALITY SUSTAINABILITY IN THIS COMMUNITY. NEXT WE WILL TALK ABOUT THE SCREEN PLAN, AND WE WILL WRAP UP WITH THE HIGH QUALITY REPRESENTATIVE PRODUCT THAT OUR COMPANY IS KNOWN FOR IN THE COMMUNITY OF ROWLETT AND AROUND THE AREA.

THE YOU BE CORRECT PROPERTY LOCATION.

WE AREN'T GOING TO SPEND A WHOLE LOT OF TIME.

IT IS OFF DALROCK ROAD. >> WE'VE GOT THE YOU PENINSULA TO OUR WEST ARES CAMBRIDGE MEADOWS TO OUR SOUTH, AND S F-10 ACROSS THE STREET ACROSS THE EAST TO DALROCK, AND SOME HIGHER INTENSITY FACILITIES, AND RESTRICTED MULTIFAMILY TO THE NORTH TOTAL SITE OF THIS PROPERTY IS PLUS OR MINUS 21.7 ACRES. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

>> CURRENT ZONING IS CONNOR SHOWED WAS ABOUT 5.2 ACRES OF LIMITED OFFICE O-1 AND ABOUT 16.5 SF-10.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE, THE FUTURE LAND USE HAS 5.2 ACRES OF FAMILY, AND RESIDENTIAL, WHICH IS DEFINED AS 77,000 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM LOTS. THE LAKESHORE VILLAGE PLANNED BEFORE YOU, FEATURES 7200 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM LOTS FOR THE ENTIRE ADD JAMESENCE I TO THE SOUTH AND WEST, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN. THE INTERIOR LOTS ARE A LITTLE SMALLER, 6,000 SQUARE FEET AND THE LOWER DENSITY I IS SMALLER THAN THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE MULTIFAMILY DENSITY I COMPONENT I ASK THAT THEY TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION FROM AN OVERALL PERSPECTIVE.

THIS IS LESS THAN IF YOU HAD IT THAT SPLIT UNLIKE THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AS IT IS TOSS OTODAY AND IT IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE 206 FOOT TO SPARE ADJACENT TO THE NEIGHBORS TO THE SOUTH AND TO THE WEST. NEXT SLIDE A PLEASE.

>> WE WOULD REQUEST THE FEEDBACK THAT YOU PROVIDED TO ME ON NOVEMBER 24TH, AND THEN BETWEEN WILL GO INTO THE AMENITIES.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. HERE'S OUR CONCEPT PLAN EXHIBIT.

I SHOW THIS TO YOU BECAUSE IT ALSO REFLECTS THE CORNER STONE CHURCH'S RETAINED PROPERTY OUTSIDE THE DARK BROOKLINE BOUNDARY YOU CAN SEE HOW THIS IS A COHESIVE DEVELOPMENT TOGETHER.

IT IS 99 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS YOU. WHICH IS THE YELLOW LOTS BEFORE YOU ARE THE 50 BY 120 WHICH IS THE TYPE A LOTS, AND THE PUSH OF PURPLE LOTS ARE THE 60 BY 20 MINIMUM, WHICH IS THE TYPE B LOT, THIS IS A VERY COLLABORATIVE EFFORT DORA LONG TIME AND HOPE THAT YOU CAN SEE THE INTELLIGENCE, AND THOUGHT BEHIND THIS PROJECT BE AS WE GO THROUGH THIS TONIGHT.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. HE THE HOMES ON THE 50 FOOT WIDE LOTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 1850 SQUARE FEET WITH AT LEAST 35 PERCENT BEING AT LEAST 2,000 SQUARE FEET.

WHAT THAT MEANS IS THAT APARTMENT LEAST 50 PERCENT HE HAVE THESE HOMES SHALL BE AT LEAST 2,000 SQUARE FEET.

THAT'S A MINIMUM. THE HOMES ON THE 60 FOOT LOTS WHICH ARE THE PURPLE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 2,000 SQUARE FEET ON ALL OF THEM FROM THE GET GO, WE WILL DISTAL LOTS FOR BOUGHTEDIFICATION, AND ATTRACTIVE STREETESSCAPE, IT HA

[01:05:04]

WE ARE AT 2,000 SQUARE FEET AS A MINIMUM.

OUR AVERAGE WILL BE HIGHER THAN THE PENINSULA ARES AND CAMBRIDGE MEADOWS, I WOULD BE WILLING TO BET A LOT OF MONEY ON THAT FACT.

WE ARE GOING TO BE FOR SURE HIGHER THAN PENINSULA, AND AVERAGING HIGHER THAN CAMBRIDGE MED OWES SO WE ARE COMPATIBLE WITH OUR NEIGHBORS. AGAIN 35 PERCENT OF THE 50S WILL HAVE A NUMBER OF 2,000 SQUARE FEET.

THOSE ARE MINIMUMS. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

>> SO ON NOVEMBER 24TH WE WERE DENIED 4-3 CITING CONCERNS AS I HEARD WITH THE AND YOU JUST REITERATED I HEARD AGAIN LOT SIZE, NUMBER 2 IS NO RECESS FOR FRONTET FROM GARAGE CAN RESULT UNTIL INSUFFICIENT DRIVEWAY DEPTH ON 50 FOOT LOTS AND THE THIRD THING THAT I HEARD THE REINSET MAY BE TOO CLOSE TO THE SOUTH AND TO THE WEST OF THE 50 FOOT HOMES.

THAT'S WHAT I HEARD JUST MOMENTS AGO.

>> NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, SO FOR CORINTHIANS KCONCERN NUMBER 1

LOT SIZE. >> I JUST YOU WANT TO REITERATE AND ASK THAT THEY TAKE THIS INTO, IT DEFINES LOW DENSITY I BEING APARTMENT LISA CERTAIN THOUSAND SQUARE FEET.

WE HAVE 7200 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM SIZE LOTS ENTIRE AJADENCE I HAVE THE WEST AND SOUTH. AGAINST, OUR LOTS ARE 6,000 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM. BUT THE OVERALL DENSITY I IS STILL LOWER THAN IF WE HAD A MULTIFAMILY THAT WE DO TROY THIS PROPERTY AND LOSE THEY OPPORTUNITY.

LOT SIZE DO NOT EQUAL VALUE. OUR PROJECTS THE PRICE POINTS RANGED FROM THE MID THREES TO MID FOURS, PLUS OPTIONS AND PEOPLE TYPICALLY SPEND 40 TO $50,000 ON OPTIONS WITH US, AND I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT IF YOU ZILLOW UP THE VALUE OF THE HOMES IN THE PENINSULA. THEY ARE BETWEEN THE MID AND HIGH 2 HUNDREDS, AND IF YOU ZILLOW UP RIGHT NOW THE CAMBRIDGE MEADOWS TO THE SOUTH, THE HOMES ADJACENT TO OUR PROPERTY RANGED FROM 285,309,000.

SO OUR PRICE POINT IS GOING TO PULL THEM UP AND IT'S GOING TO PULL EVERYBODY UP. WHICH IS GREAT FOR THE CITY AND

ITS NEIGHBORS. >> AND YOU IT'S HIGH QUALITY.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. CONCERN NUMBER 2ND, REGARDING RECESS, THE VARIANCE FOR NOT HAVING A 4-FOOT OFFSET ON THE

GARAGE. >> WE HAD TO WORK WITH MY BUILDING COMPANY MANY WINDSOR HOMES AND WE WOULD RATHER HAVE A TEAL THAN NO DEAL. WE LOVE ROWLETT, WE NEED A POSITION IN ROWLETT. WE HOPE THAT YOU FEEL LIKE OUR PRODUCT IS GREAT AND WE'VE DONE A GOOD JOB FOR YOU, WE ARE GOING TO MODIFY PLANS TO MAKE SURE WE CAN PROVIDE THE EXTRA 5 FOOT.

NOT 4 FEET. 5 FEET, AN EXTRA FOOT FOR WHAT THE INTENT OF THE RDC, WAS FOR THE OFFSET.

WE HAVE 25 FEET, NOT JUST 20 FEET.

ON ALL OF THE 50 FOOT TYPE A LOTS, AND I JUST HEARD THE COMMENT THAT TRUST FOR CLARIFICATION YES THE TYPE B LOTS REMAIN AT A 25 FATTY FRONT INTERPRET BACK, AND THEY DON'T NEED THAT BECAUSE OF THE J-SWING GARAGE, AND IT IS FURTHER OFFSET BY THE WIDTH OF THE DOUBLE BORE, AND THAT'S 35 FEET OR PLUS BACK, AND YOU HAVE AN INSIDE SWING FOR THE 2 CAR GARAGE, YOU ARE WELL OFF THE STREET WITH AN INSIDE SWING.

WHAT WE IT IS MAKE SURE THAT EVERY TYPE A LOT HAS A 25 FOOT FRONT, AND THAT'S EX EXCLUDING THE SIDEWALK, AND IT'S PROCEDURALLY THE DRIVEWAY MINIMUM.

AND YOU CAN HAVE AN EXTENDED CAB OF 25 FEET AND BE OUT OF THE WAY. NUMBER 3, THERE WITH AS HE COMMENT ABOUT REAR SETBACK OF 25 FEET MIGHT BE TOO CLOSE ONTO THE

EXISTING HOMES ON THE SOUTH >> WE ARE CUSTOMIZING HOUSE PLANS KEEPING EVERYTHING IN THE SAME PRICE POINTS, BUT WE ARE GOING TO INCREASE THE VEER SETBACK ON EVERY LOT FROM 10 TO 15 FEET E AND AGAIN KEEPING ALL OF THE SAME HIGH QUALITY CONSTRUCTION ARES AND PD, COMMITMENTS.

>> THE NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. >> THIS IS SIMPLE TABLE THAT HIGHLIGHTS IN RED THOSE CHANGES THAT I JUST DISCUSSED.

SO THE TYPE A LOTS HAVE INCREASED FROM 20 TO 25 FEET.

MINIMUM FRONT SETBACKS AGAIN THAT'S EXCLUDING THE SIDEWALK, AND THEN THE REAR SETBACK FOR BOTH TYPES HAS INCREASED 5 FEET TO THE 15 FEET TOTAL. AND AGAIN, ON THE TYPE A LOTS 35 PERCENT OF THEM MUST BE 2,000 SQUARE FEET AS A MINIMUM WHICH PUTS AT LEAST HALF OF THESE LOTS OVER 2,000 SQUARE FEET PER

[01:10:07]

DWELLING. >> THIS IS A ZOOMUP EXHIBIT THAT WE HAD HE PREPARED BY OUR ENGINEERING OFFICIAL THAT WITH THE 15 FOOT MINIMUM SETBACK, THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE HOMES ON OUR SOUTHERN EDGE ARE GOING TO BE BETWEEN 60 TO 84 FEET.

PLUS WE ARE BUILDING A BRAND NEW 8-FOOT AT ALL WILL BOARD ON BOARD FENCE ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE.

>> 7200 SQUARE FEET IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FUTURE PLAN, WITH THE 2,000 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM HOUSE SIZE WHICH IS RIGHT ONLINE WITH WHAT THEIR EXISTING HOME SIZES ARE, BECAUSE THAT'S A MINIMUM, AND REMEMBER THEIR AVERAGE IN CAMBRIDGE

MEADOWS IS 2400 SQUARE FEET. >> WITH RESPECT TO OUR NEIGHBORS ON THE WEST SIDE ON THE PENINSULA, WITH THE 15 FOOT MINIMUM SED BACK, THE DISTANCE RANGES FROM 58, TO 85 FEET.

WITH A 6 FOOT AT ALL BOARD ON BOARD FENCE ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, AND YOU HAVE THE ALLEY AND THE EXISTING REAR YARD FENCES OF

THOSE NEIGHBORS. >> WE ARE COMPLIANT WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN WITH THE 7200 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM LOT SIZE AND A 2,000 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM HOUSE SIZE AND THEIR AVERAGE BUILDING AREA IS 2100 SQUARE FEET.

SO THERE IS NO INCOMPATIBILITY WITH OUR ADJACENT NEIGHBOR SOURCE. WE HAVE STEMMED UP THE GAME IN STANDARDS, AS YOU HAVE DIRECTED AND WE ARE PROUD AND HAPPY TO DO SO. BUT I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU HAVE THESE STATISTICS IN FRONT OF YOU, THESE FACTS TO SHOW YOU

THIS UPCLOSE. >> NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE

>> THE AMENITIES, THIS IS GOING TO BE A REPEAT.

AGAIN, WE DID NOT REMOVE OR DILUTE IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM THE AMENITIES, WE HAVE CLEANED UP SOME THINGS THAT HAVE STOPPED DRECTION. WE ARE HAPPY TO DO THAT.

WE HAVE AN ENCLOSED PLAYGROUND LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. THE DOG PARK MANY WHERE THE NUMBER 2 IS AT THE FRONT. IT IS GOING TO BE AN ENCLOSED FENCED IN AREA AS WELL. AN ORGANIC COMMUNITY GARDEN ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE FIRST ENTRANCE, WHERE YOU SEE THE 3, WE HAVE PARK BENCHES, TRAILS AND PICNIC BE TABLES AROUND THAT DOG PARK, AND THE OPEN SPACE WHICH WILL MEANDER AROUND TO AVOID TREE CONFLICTS. WE HAVE A NEW NEIGHBORHOOD GAZEBO THAT WE ARE GOING TO PUT WHERE YOU SEE THE NUMBER 5 IN THAT LINEAR OPEN SPACE IN THE CENTER OF THE PROPERTY.

WHERE YOU ALSO SEE NUMBER 6 WITH THE TRAIL ACCESS AS WELL TO MAKE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS VERY USER FRIENDLY.

YOU CAN SEE THE CORNERSTONE PROPERTY THERE AND HOW IT ALL TIES IN. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

>> HERE SEE REPRESENTATIVE THAT PLANE GROUND EXAMPLES THAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT PUTTING IN THE NORTH WEST CORNER.

THIS IS WILL BE GATED AS WELL. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE E THE LARGE OPEN SPACE AT THE ENTRANCE WILL BE PRESERVING THOSE TREE CLUSTERS. WE ARE HE HAPPY HE AND 100 PERCENT COMMITTED TO STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS AS JUST STATED.

WE DON'T HAVE ANY OBJECTIONS TO THOSE CONDITIONS THAT THEY ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL ON. WE HAVEN HACKED YOU LANDSCAPING, THE DOG PARK, PARK BENCHES, TRASH RECEPTACLES, VERY HIGH QUALITY PACKAGE HERE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, WE SAW THIS PHOTO ON STAFF'S PRESENTATION, THESE TREES ARE BEAUTIFUL AND WORTH WORKING AROUND. THAT'S WHAT WE ARE GOING TO DO.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. >> WE HAVE THE DOG PARK UNDER THE SHADED AREA, BEAUTIFUL PLACE FOR PEOPLE TO HAVE THEIR DOGS, AND IT WILL BE GATED. AND THEN YOU WILL HAVE A TRIAL AROUND IT SO PEOPLE CAN WALK AROUND THE TRAIL OF NOT BEING IN TO THE ENVIRONMENT WITH THE DOGS IF THEY CHOSE NOT TO WITH BENCHES AND TRAILS AROUND IT. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

>> AND THEN OF COURSE, THE COMMUNITY GARDEN WHICH IS A FUN TRENDY THING THAT PEOPLE LIKE TO DO AS A NEIGHBORHOOD TOGETHER AND IT WILL BE HOA MAINTAINED. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

>> AND THEN YOU CAN SEE IN THE LANDSCAPE HARD SCAPE PLAN, WITH TRAILS AND BENCHES AROUND THE DOG PARK.

>> AS STAFF'S REPORT HAS SHOWN, WE ARE HAPPY TO FOLLOW STAFF OF'S RECOMMENDATION TO REMOVE THIS STRIP AND WE ARE DOING A KEY GATE -- A GATED ACCESS ARES KEY CARD FOR HOMEOWNERS TO HAVE WHERE HAD -- THAT'S WHY WE HAVE THE TRAIL GOING OFF FROM DALROCK AROUND THE CIRCLE TO THE DOG PARK THAT WAS ANTICIPATED WITH A GOOD IDEA SUGGESTED BY STAFF IN LIEU OF THAT STRETCH, THAT

[01:15:02]

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. >> ANOTHER THING THAT WE WANTED TO POINT OUT TOO IS HOW WE WORKED WITH CORNER STONE CHURCH.

ON NOVEMBER 24TH, WE HADN'T HAD A DETAILED PLAT DONE WITH THE CHURCH AND STAFF AND THE CITY. IT HAS BEEN COMPLETED WITH CORNERSTONE CHURCH TO ASSURE THAT THE LANDSCAPE IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE RDC, WITH THAT SOUTHERN ENTRANCE ON DALROCK ROCK ROAD, AND I BELIEVE THAT THE CHURCH WILL BE ABLE TO SPEAK IF YOU WANT TO SPEAK WITH THEM.

AND YOU CAN SEE THE TREES THAT WE ARE PLANNING ALONG CORNERSTONE DRIVE TO COMPLY. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

>> AND THIS WAS LAST WE HAVE A NICE ATTRACTIVE GAZEBO, IN THE LINE OF SIGHT WITHIN THAT LINEAR OPEN SPACE.

WE WILL PUT THAT IN AS WELL AS THE TRAILS, AND LOTS OF LANDSCAPING AND SHRUBS PER THE LAND OCCS

LANDSCAPING. >> NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

>> SOMETHING THAT'S ALL DIFFERENT THAT WE DID NOT HAVE.

WE ARE MAKING EVERY EDGE OF THE PERIMETER OF THIS PROPERTY S HAD MAINTAINED BY THE H O. AT IN PERPETUITY.

IT WILL SURVIVE US AND LOOK GREAT FOR YEARS FROM NOW THAT'S ON EVERY EDGE. SO THAT I HOPE IS ALSO SOMETHING THAT YOU LOOK AT IS SUSTAINABILITY AND QUALITY OF MAINTENANCE. SO WE'VE GOT THE 6 FOOT MASONRY WALL, THE MASONRY COLUMNS, HOA MAINTAINED AROUND THE CEMETERY WE'VE GOVERNMENT THE 8 FOOT BOARD ON BOARD ALONG THE NORTH, AND LONG OPEN SPACES WILL BE DEVELOPED OR INSTALLED BY THE DEVELOPER AND ALONG THE HOMESALS THEY ARE BUILD AND IT WILL ALL BE CONSISTENT AND MAINTAINED BY THE H O.

A YOU CAN SEE AROUND THE PERIMETER, IF YOU WANT TO SEE THE EXHIBIT, THE PACKET, IT'S ALL SELF-EXPLANATORY, IT IS ALL HIGH QUALITY AND WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOA.

LASTLY, THE REPRESENTATIVE HIGH QUALITY PRODUCT.

THESE ARE SOME FAMILIAR PHOTOS THAT YOU SAW AT THE LAST MEETING. WE ARE NOT CHANGING OUR QUALITY.

WE JUST MADE SURE THAT WE ARE INCREASING THE FRONT REAR SETBACKS AS DISCUSSED AND CAN STILL HIT AWFUL OF THE QUALITY ELEMENTS THAT WE COMMITTED TO YOU PREVIOUSLY.

SO NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. >> NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

>> THESE ARE JUST BEAUTY SHOTS OF THE REPRESENTATIVE PRODUCT.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. >> NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

>> HAD YOU CAN GET A GOOD FLAVOR, J-SWING GARAGES IN THESE PHOTOS HERE. THE OF NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

THERE'S GOOD EXAMPLES OF 2-ONES, YOU CAN SEE THE SINGLE CAR GARAGES YOU WON'T HAVE ANY CONCERNS WITH THE J-SWING FRANKS THEY ARE EVEN FURTHER OFFSET. YOU HAVE THE 25 FEET SO THERE'S NO CONCERN ABOUT PARKING SPACE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. >> NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

>> NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. >> NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

>> >>.

>> THE AND LASTLY, THIS IS SOMETHING THAT I WANT TO SHOW YOU FROM A GARAGE STANDPOINT. WE'VE GOT THIS IN OUR PD, BUT ALL HOMES ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE UPGRADED STEEL DOORS WITH POLYUREETH AND I INSULATIONLATION, AND WOOD GRAIN STEEL. THE YOU WILL HAVE A VERY ATTRACTIVE ELEVATION TO EVERY HOME IN LAKESHORE VILLAGE.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. . THIS IS IS THIS THE HIGHS AND BEST USE LAND USE OF THE ENVIRONMENT.

LAKESHORE VILLAGES IS IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE ROWLETT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE OVERALL INTENT OF THE RDC, THE HIGH QUALITY QUALITY AND PRICE POINT BENEFITS EVERYONE.

WE ARE HIGHER THAN EVERYONE ELSE AROUND US.

WE HAVE A TERRIFIC AMENITIES PACKAGE, AND OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION TO PRESERVE THAT NATURAL BEAUTY AND THIS HAS BEEN COHESIVELY PLANNED WITH CORNERSTONE CHURCH.

>> ALL OF US WILL BE MAKING IT THE RIGHT QUALITATIVE DECISION THAT THE CITY OF ROWLETT WOULD BE PROUD OF FOR DECADES FROM NOW. I THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME. I HOPE THAT YOU SEE THE THOUGHT AND INTELLIGENCE IN PLANNING BEHIND THIS WITH STAFF, AND WE HOPE THAT YOU WILL LOOK FAVORABLY UPON US TONIGHT, AND HELP US WITH THE RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> THANK YOU, SIR, DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? MR. ENTROP?

[01:20:01]

>> SURE, JUST 1 QUICK QUESTION. I NOTICE ON THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH AND ALSO I THINK ON THE EAST FACING SIDE AN 8 FOOT BOARD ON BOARD WOODEN FENCE. AND I AM CURIOUS ON THE WEST SIDE, YOU'VE GOT IT LISTED AS A 6 FOOT WOODEN FENCE.

WHAT'S DIFFERENT ABOUT THAT SIDE WITH THE 6 FOOT FENCE?

>> JUST AGAINST AN ALLEY. SO IT WOULD MATCH THE EXISTING HEIGHT OF THE EXISTING NEIGHBORS AND IT'S AGAINST AN ALLEY.

WE WERE JUST TRYING TO MATCH WHAT'S ALREADY OUT THERE IN TERMS OF HEIGHT AND IT'S AGAINST AN ALLEY AS OPPOSED TO HAVING THAT EXISTING NEIGHBOR THAT MAY WANT TO HAVE AN ADDITIONAL PRIVACY HEIGHT. BUT IF WERE DIFFERENT, 6 FOOT, OR 8 FOOT. IT WASN'T ANYTHING OTHER THAN

JUST MATCHING WHAT'S OUT THERE. >> THANK YOU.

>>. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE

APPLICANT? >> OKAY.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING SO AT THIS TIME WE WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND LAURA, DO YOU HAVE ANY CALLS WAITING?

>> WE DO.PAND FIRST WE WILL GO E HOUSEKEEPING ITEMS. FOR THE CALLERS ON THE LINE, PLEASE MUTE I'LL ELECTRONICS IN THE BACKGROUND. THE CALLERS WILL BE RECOGNIZED BY THE LAST FOUR DIGITS OF THE PHONE NUMBER, OR IF YOU'VE LOGGED IN WITH A NAME. YOU WILL BE PROMPTED TO UNMUTE WHEN IT IS YOUR TURN TO SPEAK. JUST PRESS STAR 6, ONCE RECOGNIZED YOU WILL BE GIVEN THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK AFTER PROVIDING YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

THE SOUND WILL BE MUTED AT THE END OF YOUR TIME.

IF YOU HAVE ALREADY SUBMITTED YOUR COMMENTS VIA E MAIL, THEY WILL BE READ INTO THE RECORD. YOU CALLER THREE ZERO FIVE NINE, DO YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THIS ITEM?

>>. CALLER THREE ZERO FIVE NINE, IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THIS ITEM. PLEASE PRESS STAR 6 TO UNMUTE.

>> YES I WOULD. >> PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND

ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. >> BRIAN HYATT, 8210 WOODSIDE

ROAD, ROWLETT. >> GO AHEAD.

>> MY NAME IS BRIAN HYATT I REPRESENT THE GOOD PEOPLE AT CORNERSTONE CHURCH, ALSO THE PROPERTY OWNER OF THE DALROCK PROPERTY THAT WE ARE ATTEMPTING TO REZONE TONIGHT.

AND MY GOAL TONIGHT IS TO SIMPLY GIVE YOU INSIGHT WITH THIS REZONING ISSUE NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT AND THE PASSAGE AGAIN AS WE COME BEFORE YOU AND APPRECIATE THE TIME AND ALL OF YOUR HARD WORK. ADAM MENTIONED WE HAVE WORKED TIRELESSLY COMING UP ON A YEAR AND A HALF TO 2 YEARS THAT WILL BENEFIT OUR COMMUNITY, CORNERSTONE OUR CITY AS WELL AS OUR COMPANY. WE'VE WORKED HARD TO ENSURE THAT THE BEST FEATURES HAVE BEEN PRESERVED.

THE LARGE GREEN AREAS, TREE PRESERVATION, SO THE HOMEOWNERS

CAN ENJOY THE OUTDOORS. >> SOME OF THE THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN SAID BY PNZ, WE APPRECIATE. BUT MANY CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE SINCE THE FIRST TIME THAT WE'VE COME BEFORE THEM CONCERNING LOT SIZE. THEY'VE INCREASED IN SIZE, AMENITIES HAVE BEEN ADDED. SEVERAL FEATURES HAVE BEEN CHANGED SINCEDA DAY 1, AND I HOPE THAT YOU ALL APPRECIATE THAT TO ANSWER MR. WINTON'S QUESTION, IT IS A PRIVATE BALL FIELD, IT IS NOT OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.

IT IS LEASED TO A SOCCER TEAM. THE KIDS AREN'T LOSING ANYTHING IN THE COMMUNITY. IF THEY ARE ON THAT, THEY ARE TRESPASSING, THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED ON THAT PROPERTY.

IT IS NOT A PUBLIC BALL FIELD AT ALL.

TO CONTINUE THE COMMUNITY, WINDSOR SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES HAVE EXCELLENT CRAFTSMAN SHIP. THE LOT SIZES ARE MORE WHAT PEOPLE ARE WANTING, LESS YARD, MORE HOUSE.

I BELIEVE THAT THIS WILL STRONGLY DRAW FAMILIES TO OUR COMMUNITY THAT WILL STRENGTHEN US, AND OF WILL LIKE THIS PRODUCT, AND THEY ARE BUYING THEM LEFT AND RIGHT ON WOODSIDE WHERE I LIVE. THE LOT SIZES AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THESE HOMES MAKE IT POSSIBLE. IN EARLIER COMMISSIONER MEETINGS'S WALKED THAT TO THIS YOUNG MAN WHO'S A REALTOR THAT AGREED THAT SAID THAT THE CURRENT BUILDING TREND IN THIS INDUSTRIES LARGER HOMES ON SMALLER LOTS.

THIS IS SEEN IN ROCKWALL, FRIST COULD HE, AND OTHER DFW, SUBURBS

[01:25:05]

WITH OUR NEW CAMPUS BEING BUILT NEXT DOOR, THIS GIVES US AN EXCELLENT OPPORTUNITY TO MINISTER TO OUR COMMUNITY, AND WE HOPE THAT YOU GUYS WILL VOTE IN FAVOR OF THIS, AND WE

APPRECIATE YOUR TIME AGAIN. >>.

>> THAT YOU PASTOR, I SEE SOMEONE ELSE LISTED WITH YOUR NAME, IS THAT ANOTHER CALL ERROR YOU LOGGED IN ER OR

YOU LOGGED IN TWICE? >> I'M SORRY, LAURA?

>> I SEE YOUR NAME LISTED AS ANOTHER CALLER, OR IS THAT YOU

LISTED TWICE. >> THAT'S NOT MY COMPUTER, SORRY

>>. >> NEXT CALLER, SEVEN NINE ONE ONE, DO YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THIS ITEM?

>> YES, I DO. >> PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND

ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. >> MY NAME IS RICHARD MYERS, I AM THE BOARD SECRETARY OF CORNER STONE CHURCH.

THE I'D LIKE YOU TO CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS YOU DELIBERATE ON THE PROPOSAL BEFORE YOU. THIS DEVELOPMENT, ARE THE LAKESHORE VILLAGE AND THE CORNERSTONE CHURCHES WERE DESIGNED IN CONCERT E THE OBJECTIVE WAS AND STILL IS THAT BOTH PROPERTIES WILL COMPLEMENT EACH OTHER AS WELL AS THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD. NOT JUST FOR THE NEW RESIDENTS BUT FOR THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY TO ENJOY.

WE'VE HEARD SOME PEOPLE CONCERN EXPRESS ABOUT THE LOSS OF OF THE MEADOW AND THE BALL FIELD. THAT IS OUR PROPERTY, AND WE'VE ALLOWED THE NEIGHBORS TO ENJOY IT FOR MANY YEARS, FROM PARKING CARS, AND BOATS, WRITING ATV'S, OR JUST WALKING A DOG.

IN DESIGNING THE NEW LAKESHORE VILLAGE, THE CHURCH HAS DELIBERATELY PLANNED TO KEEP A LARGE PART OF THE MEADOW FOR OUR NEIGHBORS AND RESIDENTS TO ENJOY, ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE NEW CHURCH, THE AREA WILL BE ABOUT 5 ACRES.

IN THE OVERALL PLAN FOR THE BUDGET OF THE 45 ACRES HAS BEEN PRESERVED. THE PARKING ASSOCIATED WITH THE CHURCH WILL CONSUME ABOUT 5 ACRES, LEAVING ABOUT 7 ACRES OF OPEN LAND FOR THE COMMUNITY TO USE.

THE USE OF THE CHURCH'S OPEN LAND SPACE IS NOT JUST RESTRICTED TO THE NEW HOMEOWNERS, THE NEW DEVELOPMENT, BUT IT WILL BE OPEN TO THE COMMUNITY FOR ANYONE WHO WISHES

TO USE IT. >> THE LAND RAISES 17 FEET FROM DALROCK ROAD TO THE HIGHEST POINT IN THE TRACT WHERE WE WILL BE BUILDING OUR CHURCH ON THE SOUTHERN SIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT. WITH THIS FACT IN CONJUNCTION OF THE FACT OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.

HE PRESERVES THE VAST MAJORIY OF THE EXISTING TREES AT THE ENTRANCE WILL PREVENT THE PROPERTY FROM NEW HOMES BEING VIEWED FROM ANYBODY ON DALROCK. OUR MISSION OF THE CHURCH IS TO LOVE OUR NEIGHBORS, THE ONES THAT WE HAVE, THE NEIGHBORS FOR YEARS, THE NEW NEIGHBORS THAT THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BRING.

IT IS A DEEPEST HOPE THAT ALL OF OUR NEIGHBORS, OLD AND NEW WILL SEE THE VALUE OF THIS DEVELOPMENT, AND THE COOPERATIVE EFFORT BETWEEN THE CITY, THE STAFF, TO BE A VILLAGE, THE NEW CORNERSTONE CHURCH A COHESIVE AND HIGH QUALITY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. THANK YOU.

>>. >> NEXT BE CALLER IS LIMBED AS FRANK. DO YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THIS

ITEM? >> FRANK, IF UP WISH TO ADDRESS THIS ITEM, PLEASE PRESS STAR 6 OR UNMUTE.

>> FLECTION CALLER SIX ZERO FIVE NINE, DO YOU WISH TO ADDRESS

THIS ITEM? >> NO OFF AND ONS FROM THOSE CALLERS, I WILL TURN IT BACK OVER TO SUSAN WHO HAS SEVERAL SUBMITTED COMMENTS. THANK YOU, LAURA.

ED WILL MANY I BELIEVE THAT ADDING THIS NEW COMMUNITY TO OUR CITY WILL BE A GREAT DEVELOPMENT.

HAD CORNERSTONE CHURCH IS MY HOME, I AM IN FAVOR OF THE CORNER STONE CHURCH PROPERTY. I HAVE HE HAVE BEEN GOING TO CORNERSTONE FOR 17 YEARS, OVER THE COMMUNITY AND MANY EXCITED

[01:30:02]

NEXT COMMENT. >> YOU ON REVEREND PAM WHITE, FIRST ROWLETT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, I AM A ROWLETT PASTOR, ECUMENICAL MINISTRY. I SUPPORT CORNERSTONE CHURCH.

>> ALTHOUGH I DON'T KNOW THE ZONING CHANGE ARES I SUPPORT THE EFFORTS AND I KNOW THAT THEY ARE A VITAL PART OF MINISTRY IN OUR COMMUNITY. WILL I KNOW THAT IT WILL HELP THEM MOVE FORWARD AND FOLLOW GOD'S CALL.

NEXT COMMENT, ROY AND JEAN GILES, WE ARE IN SUPPORT OF THE LAKESHORE VILLAGE, AND NEXT COMMENT DONNA DAVIS I AM IN SUPPORT OF LAKESHORE VILLAGE. NEXT COMMENT, LEWIS EDWARDS, SEVENTY TWO TEN BALSAM, DRIVE. I WANTED TO SHOW MY SUPPORT FOR THE LAND AT THE CORNERSTONE CHURCH, S F-10 TO SF-5.

NEXT COMMENT. >> DIANA MYERS, 209 ROCK BROOK DRIVE ROCKWALL. MANY I HAVE BEEN A MEMBER OF CORNERSTONE CHURCH FOR MANY YEARS, I DO SUPPORT THE PROJECT BECAUSE I FEEL THAT IT WOULD BE GOOD FOR THE COMMUNITY.

>> NEXT COMMENT. >> MY NAME IS MATTHEW HYATT I AMMAL CITIZEN OF ROWLETT TEXAS I APPROVE THE REZONING FROM SF-10 TO SF-5 FOR THE CORNERSTONE PROPERTY.

NEXT COMMENT. >> LUIS CARTER 8510 CHESSON, DRIVE I SUPPORT THE CHANGE FOR THE PROPERTY ON DALROCK, AND I SEE IT BEING BUILT BY WINDSOR, AND SKORBURG PROPERTIES.

I BELIEVE THAT THE HOMES THAT THEY INTEND TO BUILD ON THE DALROCK PROPERTY WILL ALSO BE HIGH QUALITY.

THE HOMES WILL BE A COMPLEMENTARY ADDITION TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. PLEASE CONSIDERATION THIS REZONING. NEXT COMMENT.

>> DAVID AND SHARON BARNES, MARKET DRIVE.

WE LIVE AT 8005 BACK THE DRIVE ROWLETT TEXAS FOR APPROXIMATELY 18 YEARS I AM WRITING IN SUPPORT OF CORNERSTONE'S EFFORTS TO REZONE THEIR PROPERTY FROM SF-10, TO SF-5.

THE CORNERSTONE CHURCH HAS BEEN A FRIEND TO OUR COMMUNITY FOR YEARS, AND WE IN FAVOR OF THE PLAN.

>> ALEX JONES, ROWLETT TEXAS, I WANTED TO EXPRESS MY REZONING OF THE PROPERTY FROM THE CORNERSTONE CHURCH FROM AN SF-10 TO AN SF-5. NEXT COMMENT.

>> OF THE FOLLOWING IS A FORM O MAIL WE RECEIVED FROM THE FOLLOWING RESIDENTS. DOT I LETT, BOB BE WEBB, SALLY FIELDS, SALLY COMMENCER, AND I AM IN SUPPORT OF THE REZONING OF THE CORNERSTONE PROPERTY ON DALROCK, FROM SF-10 TO SF-5.

NEXT COMMENT. >> SALLY FROMMING OR I THIS IS THE THIRD TIME THAT I HAVE E MAILED IN SUPPORT OF THE LAKESHORE VILLAGE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT.

MY HUSBAND ALLEN GREGORY WAS THE PASTOR OF CORNERSTONE CHURCH.

MANY HE WAS THE PASTOR AT THE TIME THAT THE PROPERTY WAS PURCHASED, THE CHURCH'S VISION WAS A HOUSING RELEVANTMENT ON THE OTHER PART. AND HE HAD PLANS DRAWN WITH HIS VISION IN MIND, BUT HE PASSED AWAY IN 2015 BEFORE PART OF THE LAND WAS SOLD TO THE CHARTER SCHOOL.

I DON'T THINK THAT HIS PLAN SHOWED THE VALUE FROM 300 TO 400,000, BUT I AM SURE THAT HE WOULD HAVE BEEN SO EXCITED FOR THAT TO HAPPEN. I DON'T KNOW WHY YOU APPROVE SO MANY APARTMENTS BEING BUILT, BUT YOU HAVE TROUBLE HAVING A FEW BEAUTIFUL HOMES BUILT BY A NEW BEAUTIFUL CHURCH BUILD YOU.

I DO LIVE IN ROWLETT ABOUT 5 MILES FROM THIS PROPERTY.

BLESSINGS TO YOU ALL. NEXT COMMENT.

A CAROLYN BROWN UNFIELD. THE I AM HIGHLY IN FAVOR AND SUPPORT THE REZONING REQUEST OF THE LAKESHORE VILLAGE PROPERTY HERE IN ROWLETT TEXAS. NEXT COMMENT.

HE TONY RORY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE MEN AND LADIES OF HONOR.

PLEASE ACCEPT THIS LETTER OF MY FULL SUPPORT OF THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE AND CONSIDERATION FROM SF-10 TO SF-5.

I WOULD LIKE TO EXPRESS MY SUPPORT OF THE CORNERSTONE CHURCH AND THEIR CONTRIBUTION TO THE COMMUNITY.

THEY ARE A BLESS EGG TO THE COMMUNITY.

I BELIEVE THAT THE HIGH QUALITY NEIGHBORHOOD THAT WINDSOR AND THE SKORBURG COMPANY WILL BUILD WILL BE A GREAT UPGRADE FOR THAT AREA OF ROWLETT. NEXT COMMENT.

COLE HITCHCOCK SENIOR PASTOR, I AM SENDING THIS IN SUPPORT OF THE DEVELOPMENT LAKESHORE VILLAGE.

OUR CITY NEEDS DEVELOPMENT TO INCREASE OUR TAX BASE FOR THE BETTERMENT OF OUR RESIDENTS IT WILL HELP OUR COMMUNITY AS IT

[01:35:01]

NEXT COMMENT. SO THIS IS A FORM E MAIL WE RECEIVED FROM THE FOLLOWING RESIDENTS.

LISA HYATT, 8210 WOODSIDE ROAD. KENRA BELLMARCH, MARTHA LANE.

AND MICHAEL EMBETTER, 9232 WILLOE BROOK, I HAVE BEEN PRIVILEGED TO WATCH AS THE BEAUTIFUL HOMES HAVE BEEN BUILT BY PEARSON ELEMENTARY BUILD BY THE WINDSOR HOMES SKORBURG COMPANY. I WILL IN FAVOR OF THE REZONING THIS WILL ALLOW MORE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES FOR ROWLETT.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.

NEXT COMMENT THIS IS ALSO A FORM WILL E MAIL THAT WE RECEIVED FROM THE FOLLOWING RESIDENTS, BE RICK AND JULIE BAILEY, 30810 HE YOU TUB MAN TRAIL, AND PASTOR MCK MCKINLEY, ROWLETT BAPTIST, AND MART IN, AND EMILY MAY U HUGH, 3 MAY U, 3006 MAYHEW DRIVE. LINDA MORGAN, AND FREEDOM PLACE CHURCH, 3908 MAIN STREET, AND PASTOR BARNIE JUI, 5700 MARK LANE. I SUPPORT CORNERSTONE'S ZONING CHANGE OF THEIR DALROCK PROPERTY.

>> NEXT HE PROMPT, SHARON MARINO AS A MEMBER OF CORN CORNERSTONE CHURCH AND A RESIDENT OF ROWLETT, I SUPPORT CORONA VIRUS PROPERTY FROM SF-10 TO SF-5. NEXT COMMENTS.

>> MY NAME IS DEBBIE, I AM A MEMBER OF CORNERSTONE CHURCH ROWLETT, I AM A MEMBER OF THE LAKESHORE VILLAGE SINGLE HOUSING

DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY. >> CRAIG SHELL, PASTOR LIGHT CITIES COMMUNITY CHURCH, 801 LIBERTY GROVE.

DEVPNZ, COMMITTEE, I KNOW WHAT IMPORTANT WORK THAT YOU DO TO KEEP OUR CITY'S GROWTH COHESIVE AND POSITIVE I AM FOLLOWING UP ON MY HYMN MAIL SENT SEPTEMBER 20, 2020, AND I ASK YOU TO SUPPORT THE ZONING REQUEST WHICH IMPACTS THE PROPERTY ON CONFEDERATE CORNERSTONE CHURCH, I HAVE KEPT UP ON THIS THROUGH PASTOR HYATT, AND BECAUSE OF THE GOOD FAITH WORK TO RESPOND POSITIVELY TO YOUR INPUT I URGE YOU TO NOW APPROVE THE REQUESTED CHANGE FROM SF-10 TO SF-5.

THIS CHANGE WILL HAVE SUFFICIENT BENEFICIAL IMPACT TO THE DYNAMIC CHANGES HAPPENING ON SOUTH DALROCK ROAD IT WILL MOVE OUR CITY FORWARD AND BENEFIT OUR RESIDENTS FOR YEARS TO COME E AND IT WILL BENEFIT THE FAITH COMMUNITY WHICH IS AT THE HEART OF THE CITY. ALL OF US IN FAITH COMMUNITY RECOGNIZE CORNERSTONE CHURCH AS A LEADER IN IMPACTING AND TRANSFORMING LIVES AND WE LOOK FORWARD TO THEIR NEW FACILITY BEING A BEACON OF LIGHT FOR OUR CITY AND WE PRAY FOR WISDOM FOR TUESDAY'S MEETING. NEXT COMMENT.

>>ERED PAUL ECKERD SENIOR, IF A ROWLETT CAN CONTINUE TO PROVIDE SOCIAL NEEDS AS WELL AS A MIXED DENSITY I HAVE HOUSING TYPES, AND SUPPLY SAFE HOUSING, AND RECOGNIZE REQUEST BASED ON SOLID BUSINESS PRACTICE, GETTING THE BEST VALUE FOR 1'S INVESTMENT AND WELL ACQUAINTED WITH THE LEADERSHIP AT CORNERSTONE. THEY HAVE DEMONSTRATED TO WORK TO ONLY ENHANCE THE ROWLETT COMMUNITY.

FOR EXAMPLE, THEIR IMMEDIATE RESPONSE IS OPENING THEIR DOORS AND HEARTS OF GATHERING, AND DISTRIBUTION CENTER DURING THE TORNADO, AND ALLOWING THEIR FACILITY TO BE USED FOR A SCHOOL WHERE TEAM LEAST OF LOWER SOCIOECONOMIC LEVELS ARE ABLE TO HAVE THEIR CHILDREN CAPITOLED. I APPRECIATE YOU'RE CONSIDERATION IN ADDRESSING THIS REQUEST.

PASTOR ANN DOBSON, THEY ARE IN SUPPORT OF THE REZONING QUESTION FOR THE LAND BY CORNERSTONE ASSEMBLY OF GOD ON DALROCK.

HE. >> THE PASTOR, 4310 DALROCK, I SUPPORT CORNERSTONE CHURCH, AND THEIR DESIRE TO DEVELOP PROPERTY. PLEASE APPROVE THE ZONING REQUEST FOR THE LAKESHORE VILLAGE.

IT IS A GREAT PROJECT, AND SHOULD BE APPROVED.

NEXT COMMENT. >> PRESENT AND AMOUNTIS SON BE

LANE, 8505 MARTHA LANE. >> I WOULD LIKE TO PROVIDE INPUT

[01:40:02]

I'VE HEARD HOMEOWNERS BRING IT UP.

BUT AFTER IT RAINS THERE IS SIGNIFICANT EROSION, AND ONCE THE PLOTS ARE DEVELOPED, I BELIEVE IT WILL BE WORSE, AND I BELIEVE IF THERE'S AN ALLEY CONSTRUCTED IT WILL TAKE CARE OF THE DRAINAGE ISSUE. I DON'T KNOW WHY THE DEVELOPER IS WANTING A MINIMUM SETBACK OF 15 FEET WITH THE PRELIMINARY CONCEPT PLAN PROVIDED WITH THE PACKET.

THE CURRENT SETBACK IS 25 FEET. WE ARE OPPOSED TO REZONING THE SF-5. IT SHOULD STAY AT SF-10 AS CURRENTLY ZONED. THAT'S THE LAST COMMENT THAT I

HAVE. >>.

>> >> ALSO UNMUTE LISA. >> ALL RIGHT.

SO WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IF THAT'S THE LAST SPEAKER. AT THIS TIME I WILL ASK THE COMMISSION IF YOU HAVE ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM OR ARE

WE READY FOR A MOTION? >> MR. WINTON.

>> I DO HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE DEVELOPER.

>> OKAY. >> WOULD THERE BE ANY CONSIDERATION IN REDUCING THE NUMBER OF LOTS, OFFICIAL RIGHT, 99 TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF LOTS FROM THE MAIN INCREASING OF THE LOT SIZEMORE THAN THE SOUTH AND THE WEST SIDE IS THERE ANY CONSIDERATION TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF TOTAL LOTS ON THIS

PROPERTY? >> YOU BELIEVE YOU NEED TO UNMUTE, SIR. THAT STEVE STEPHEN, YOU ARE

FINE. >> HIS MUTE BUTTON IS NOT ON.

>> WE CAN'T HEAR YOU. IN IN ORDER TO HE HELP EASE SOME THINGS ALONG, IS IT POSSIBLE THAT HE CAN CALL INTO THE PHONE NUMBER, OR IF YOU WANT TO GIVE HIM SOME DIRECTIONS, MAYBE HE CAN CALL IN. SUBPOENA.

>> CAN YOU CALL INTO THE MEETING ON YOUR CELL PHONE POSSIBLY.

TRY TO LOG OUT, AND LOG BACK IN. >> YOU MIGHT ALSO THINK ABOUT LOGGING OUT AND LOGGING IN, AND TRYING TO REJOIN.

HEY, LEASISA, WHILE WE ARE WAIT FOR THEM TO COME BACK, CAN WE

ASK A QUESTION OF STAFF. >> CAN YOU GUYS HEAR US NOW?

>> YES. >> JUST A MINUTE, WE WILL COME BACK TO YOU. GO AHEAD.

>> APPLICANT, GO AHEAD. COMMISSIONER WINTON, WHERE AUP RIGHT NOW, THE ANSWER IS NO. WE STARTED WITH 102 LOTS.

IT'S VERY TIGHT. THE AMENITIES ARE VERY EXPENSIVE AND THE A REMEMBER ERE PERIMETER AND THE OPEN SPACE OF THE AMENITIES IS VERY EXPENSIVE. TO WORK AROUND THE TREES, AND DO THE DESIGN OF THE RETAINING WALLS EVERYTHING THAT WE KNOW HAS TO GO IN TO DEVELOP THE SITE WITH THE QUALITY, THAT WE HAVE THOUGHT THROUGH FROM SOUP TO NUTS.

I DON'T HAVE THAT'S BUILT. IF WE TAKE OUT LOTS BEYOND THE 3 THAT WE HAVE ALREADY REMOVED SINCE WE START HE HAD THE PROCESS AND FOR THE 60 FOOT LOTS, THE TYPE B, IT BASICALLY FALLS ABOUT CAN TO THE CHURCH. AND AND THAT'S THE HONEST TRUTH OF IT. SO I CAN'T, IN MY POSITION RIGHT NOW MAKE IT WORK. WE HAVE A BANKABLE MARGIN.

THIS IS NOT -- THIS IS VERY VERY TIGHT RIGHT NOW.

SOMETHING HAS TO GIVE. WHETHER THAT BE BIGGER LOTS, BUT NO AMENITIES ARES I DON'T THINK THAT'S WHAT THE RDC, WOULD WANT.

I THINK THAT WE HAVE A GREAT COMPROMISE HERE WHERE THE R

[01:45:06]

>> THAT IS GREAT FOR THE SURROUNDING AREA.

I CAN'T IN GOOD CONSCIENCE LOOK TO MY PROPERTY OWNER AND TELL THEM THAT THEIR LAND CAN'T BE -- WE CAN'T MAKE THEIR DREAMS COME TRUE, AND BUILD THEIR FUTURE CAMPUS AND THEIR PLANS BUT YOU HAVE ALL OF THE POWER AND I RESPECT THAT AND DEFER IF TO THAT. AND THAT'S THE HONEST TRUTH OF WHERE I AM RIGHT NOW. AND I WOULDN'T BE DOING ALL OF THE THINGS THAT WE HAVE BEEN DOING IF I HAD ANYTHING ELSE TO

GIVE. >> AND I APPRECIATE THAT.

AND I CAN TELL THE HONESTY. I CAN RELATE THROUGH YOUR PREVIOUS PROJECTS. YOUR COMPANY IS A STANDUP COMPANY, AND BE I APPRECIATE THAT WITH THE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CITY AND EVERYTHING THAT YOU ALL SAY.

SO THERE'S A LOT OF VALUE WITH THAT PIECE OF IT O SO THE OTHER QUESTION IN REGARDS TO THE FENCE.

WHAT MATERIAL ON THAT FENCE, PARTICULARLY ON THE WEST SIDE THAT WE WERE TALKING WITH THE 6 FOOT FENCE.

IF IT HAD TO BE 8 FOOT. WHAT MATERIAL IS THAT MATERIAL USED WITH THE BOARD ON BOARD. IT WOULD BE THE SAME KIND OF WOOD ALL AROUND. IT'S CEDAR, THE BEST TYPE OF WEATHERING MATERIAL, OR SPRUCE WITH THAT FENCE.

IF YOU WANT IT TO BE 8 FOOT ALL AROUND.

YOU GO TO I AM INDIFFERENT. WE JUST HAD HAD THE 6 FOOT

BECAUSE OF THE MATCH. >> I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND THE REASONING THERE. I WAS JUST HOPING THAT WASN'T A TREATED -- IT WILL BE PRESTAINED, AND STAINED IN PERPETUITY BY THE BY THE HOS, SO IT WON'T EVER LOOK BAD.

>> GO AHEAD JOHN. >> QUICK QUESTION VERSUS CONCERNING, THE CEMETERY. RIGHT NOW AS I LOOK AT YOUR DRAWINGS, THERE'S A MASON WALL THAT YOU ARE GOING TO PLACE AROUND THAT CEMETERY; IS THAT CORRECT?

>> TO THE APPLICANT? >> YES, SIR,S AND THEN THAT LITTLE ALLEYWAY, ARE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IS TALKING ABOUT, YOU HAVE THEN A TUBULAR FENCE ALONG THERE.

MY QUESTION IS WHY DO WE NEED THAT MASONRY WALL?

>> I AM ONLY DOING IT BECAUSE THAT IS A REQUEST OF THE STAFF, AND WE ARE HAPPY TO FOLLOW STAFF'S GUIDANCE.

I GUESS MAYBE HUNTER CAN CHIME IN.

BUT I THINK THAT THE TERMNOLOGY BY CONNOR WAS COMPATIBLE USE AND IT REQUIRES A MASONRY BASE SCREENING WALL IS THAT

CORRECTTERMNOLOGY? >> YES, ADAM.

WE RECOMMENDED THAT WALL, MR. COTE.

>> I UNDERSTAND. IT WOULD KIND OF CLOSE OFF THAT SECTION. I THINK THAT IT WOULD LOOK BAD VERSUS LEAVING LIKE A 4 OR 5 FOOT DECORATIVE FENCE AROUND THE CEMETERY AND THEN THAT WALKWAY THROUGH THERE WOULD NOT BE A TUNNEL EFFECT. IT WE AWE THEM TO USE THE CORNERSTONE DRIVE TO THE DOG PARK, AND FEELING GOOD AND EVERYTHING LOOK OKAY. SO THE REASON WHY I BRING THIS UP IS BECAUSE I AM THINKING ABOUT TRYING TO MAKE A MOTION HERE I AM NOT NECESSARILY. I THINK OF PUTTING IN A

DECORATIVE FENCE. >> FROM THE MANY A CAN'T PERSPECTIVE I AM GOOD EVERY EITHER WAY.

>> DO YOU WANT TO ADD ANYTHING TO THIS PARTICULAR ITEM.

>> COMMISSIONER COTE AND COMMISSIONERS ABSOLUTELY AS PART OF YOUR RECOMMENDATION YOU CAN RECOMMEND AN ALTERNATIVE FROM WHAT IS PROPOSED ON THE CONCEPT PLAN THAT THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED. I THINK THAT THE ORIGINAL INTENT

[01:50:02]

1 OF THE COMMENT THAT SHE SAID. SHE MENTIONED SOMETHNG ABOUT AN EROSION ALONG THE ALLEY, IS THIS A CITY PROBLEM, OR A PROBLEM THAT COULD OCCUR ON THIS FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SITE THAT YOU WOULD HAVE TO DEAL WITH? DO YOU KNOW ANYTHING THAT SHE WAS TALKING ABOUT?

>> I COULD KNOW WHEN WE FIRST LOOKED AT THIS PROPERTY, WE WERE LOOKING AT INCORPORATING THE EXISTING ALLEY FOR THE LOTS THAT BACKED UP TO THERE, AND WE HEARD THE VOICE OF THE CONCERNS OF THOSE RESIDENTS. WE SAW THAT COMMENT.

THERE WAS A HAPPENED FULL, 3 OR 4 PEOPLE I REMEMBER SAYING THAT THEY DON'T WANT ANY MORE WATER ONTO THE ALLEY, AND WE WORKED SLOWLY WITH THE CITY EHE'S ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, AND MR. COHEN CAN CHIME IN AND TESTIFY TO THE ENGINEERING WORK THAT WE DID. WE QUICKLY CONCLUDED THAT FROM A DRAINAGE PERSPECTIVE IT WAS BEST TO MAKE SURE THAT OUR WATER WENT FORWARD AND DID NOT GO INTO THE ALLEY AND WENT FORWARD INTO THE STREET AND WE CAPTURED IT. THAT WAS A BIG PART OF WHY WE DO NOT WANT TO USE THAT ALLEY. SO THE WAY WE WE DO SIGN AND GRADE THIS PLAN. WE WOULD -- IF A DROP OF WATER PLANNED LANDED IN THE BACKYARD, IT WOULD GO FORWARD TO THE STREET AND STAY OUT OF THE ALLEY AND BETTER FROM A DRAINAGE

PERSPECTIVE. >> ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU. >> MR. COHEN, HAD IS THERE ANYTHING THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADD THERE ON THAT?

>>. >> AM I THINK A THAT'S THE A PRETTY GOOD DESCRIPTION. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? . OKAY.

WELL, I GUESS WE ARE READY FOR A MOTION.

BUT I WOULD LIKE TO REMIND YOU THAT THERE WERE SOME STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS YOU AND THEIR PROPOSAL OR PRESENTATION TONIGHT THAT YOU CAN REFER TO AS THE RECOMMENDATION SLIDE OF THEIR PRESENTATION. MR. COTE.

>> YES, MA'AM. WILL I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SF-10 DISTRICT AND LIMITED OFFICE DISTRICT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENT SF-5 USES AS PRESENTED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS THAT 1, THE OPEN SPACE AMENITIES AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDED IN THE GENERAL LOCATION, AND GENERAL QUANTITIES AS DEPICTED WITH THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTION.

FURTHER LANDSCAPE, AND HARDSCAPE TREATMENTS BE UTILIZED ALONG THE SOUTHERN ENTRY WAY OF THE COMMUNITY TO MEET THE SECONDARY ENTRY WAY REQUIREMENT, AND THOSE COULD BE PROVIDED BY CORNERSTONE CHURCH'S DEVELOPMENT OF THAT CORNER.

>> AND STRIKE STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR EITHER INCREASING OR DOING AWAY WITH THE OPEN SPACE CORRIDOR BETWEEN THE CEMETERY AND LOT 30. BUT RATHER REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT OF A MASONRY BASE SCREENING WALL AND USE A DECORATIVE METAL FENCE, BETWEEN LOT 30 OR THE WALKWAY, AND THE CEMETERY TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOA AND IN PERPETUITY.

>> AND TO RESERVE A PRESERVATION SHOW THE IS IT TREES, AND OPEN

SPACES AS RESERVED. >> OKAY.

WE'VE GOT A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS.

DID A GOOD JOB WITH THAT JOHN. DO WE HAVE A SECOND?

>> I'VE GOT AN AMENDMENT. >> I THINK THAT THEY'S GOT HIS HAND UP FIRST. A SECOND BY MARC.

>> I'M SORRY? >> I AM ASKING FOR AN AMENDMENT.

>> GO AHEAD. >> IN ADDITION TO WHAT MR. COTE SAID I'D LIKE TO ADD THE 8 FOOT FENCE ON THE WEST SIDE AS OPPOSED TO THE SECRETARY FOOT BOARD ON BOARD FENCE AS A

CONDITION. >> ARE YOU OKAY WITH THAT, JOHN?

>> YES. >> SO WE HAVE A MOTION.

[01:55:06]

>> CAN I SAY SOMETHING. THE STAFF WOULD LIKE CLARIFICATION ON MR. COTE'S MOTION REGARDING LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION ALONG THE SECONDARY COLLECTOR ASKING THAT THE CHURCH PROVIDE THAT JUST TRYING TO SEEK CLARIFICATION. IT'S NOT PART OF THEIR REMIT, SO

WE ARE JUST TRYING TO DETERMINE. >> WHEN YOU SAY IT'S NOT A FURTHER REMNANT. BEAR WITH ME, WHILE I SCROLL BACK UP HERE. I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT THE SOUTHERN ENTRANCE WHICH IS CORNERSTONE DRIVE THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THAT ENTRANCE WAS PART OF THE CHURCH'S DEVELOPMENT, AND IN THAT DEVELOPMENT PLAN WHICH I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT SHOWED US A DRAWING OF I NOTED THAT THEY HAD SOME LANDSCAPING AND A MONUMENT SIGN SITTING THERE AT THAT CORNER, AND WHAT I AM PROPOSING IS TO SAY THAT THEIR LANDSCAPING GO MEETS THE REQUIREMENT NECESSARY FOR THE SECONDARY ENTRANCE LANDSCAPING. DOES THAT MAKE ANY SENSE?

>> IT DOES. WE HAVE AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT

PLAN FOR THE CHURCH. >> WE WILL HAVE TO DO AN AMENDMENT TO THAT. THEY WILL COORDINATE FROM SKORBURG, AND REALIZE A CHANGE TO THAT AMENDMENT.

. >> WE HAVE A MOTION BY JOHN COTE TO APPROVE WITH SOME SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS CITY RECOMMENDATIONS AND A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING THE FENCE AND JOHN, DID YOU WANT TO DESIGNATE THE HEIGHT OF THAT DECORATIVE FENCING? DO WE NEED TO DO THAT?

>> I DON'T KNOW. I THINK THAT SHOULD BE LEFT UP TO MINAUL. THERE'S 4-FOOT FENCE AROUND

THERE NOW SO. >> AND WE HAD A SECOND BY MR. ENGEN, AND WE ALSO HAD AN AMENDMENT BY MR. WINTON, TO INCREASE THE 6 FOOT WOOD FENCE ON THE WESTERN MANY PROPERTY LINE TO 8 FEET WHICH MR. COTE AND MR. ENGEN BOTH AGREE WITH.

SO THAT'S WHAT WE ARE VOTING ON AND WE ARE READY TO ALL -- YES,

SIR, MR. COTE. >> DO WE HAVE WANT TO HAVE ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS MOTION BEFORE WE VOTE?

>> LET'S DO. MR. WINTON, WE WILL START WITH YOU. WHAT ARE YOUR COMMENTS ON THIS

MOTION? >> I THINK THAT THE WHOLE THING, I KNOW THAT IT'S BEEN A LONG ROAD, AND A LOT OF PROBABLY UNITED STATES AND DOWNS FOR THE DEVELOPER FOR THE CHURCH, AND REALLY EVERYBODY INVOLVED REALLY TO COMING TO.

I COMPLEMENT THE TURN OUT, AND THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE THAT CAME TO SPEAK. IT'S ENCOURAGING TO GET THAT KIND OF FEEDBACK AND THE NUMBER THAT WE HAD TONIGHT.

SO IT WAS ENLIGHTENING, I REALLY APPRECIATE THAT FEEDBACK AND

SUPPORT FROM THE CITIZENS. >> MR. COTE?

>> YES, MA'AM, I APPRECIATE ALL OF THE EFFORT BY THE APPLICANT.

I HONESTLY FEEL THAT WE ARE CREATING MORE OF A STEP DOWN FROM THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD TOWARDS DALROCK SO THAT MAKES IT MORE PALATABLE TO ME. AND I WILL SAY THAT I AM NOT A BETTING MAN. SO I AM NOT INCLINED TO SAY YEA OR NAY BASED ON A MINIMUM, OKAY. BUT RATHER AN ACTUAL.

SO I DON'T KNOW. I THINK THAT THIS SHOULD, AS WRITTEN, TURN OUT PRETTY GOOD FOR EVERYBODY.

>> OKAY. GOOD.

>> MR. ENTROP. YES, SIR.

>> I THINK THAT I PERSONALLY AM NOT IN FAVOR OF CHANGING FROM SF-10 DOWN TO A SMALLER ZONING. HOWEVER, AFTER REVIEWING THE DETAILS AND I THINK THAT THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE PRODUCT THAT THEY ARE PLANNING TO BUILD DOES FIT IN QUITE WELL WITH THE

[02:00:01]

SO I MEAN WITH THAT SAID I AM GOING TO BE SUPPORTING THIS MEASURE, AND THE FINAL MANY COMMENT IS I DON'T NECESSARILY THINK THAT WE NEED TO RAISE THAT FENCE ON THE WEST SIDE TO 8 FOOT. THE DEVELOPER SAID THAT THEY HAD PUT A 6 FOOT BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT THEY FELT MATCHED THE OTHER AREAS. THAT'S MY ONLY COMMENT ON THAT.

I DON'T THINK THAT WE NECESSARILY NEED TO FORCE IT TO BE AN 8 FOOT FENCE. SO I COULD BE FOR OR AGAINST THAT PART OF IT. BUT I DO PLAN TO SUPPORT THIS

MEASURE FOR TONIGHT. >> >> MR. MANY ENGEN WOULD YOU

LIKE TO COMMENT ON IT? >> IN'T WITH A TO ADAM FOR ALL OF THESE LONG MEETINGS THAT WE HAVE HAD.

YOU HAVE COME ALONG WITH MAKING A LOT OF CHANGES, AND LISTEN TO OUR CONCERNS AND ALSO THE CITY STAFF, AND LIKE AUSTIN, I WOULD LIKE THE 7200 SQUARE FOOT LOT THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE PROPERTY.

BUT WITH ALL OF THE PLANS THAT YOU HAVE PUT TOGETHER AND A LOT OF THE OPEN SPACE WHICH I APPRECIATE, IT MAKES IT MORE OF A SMALL COMMUNITY WITHIN THAT AREA, AND SO I DO APPRECIATE WHAT YOU'VE DONE, AND HAVE CERTAINLY MOVED TOWARDS THE

RIGHT STEP OF APPROVING THIS. >> MR. SEGARS.

>> I THINK THAT IT'S A PREMIUM LOT.

THIS IS A PREMIUM PIECE OF PROPERTY TO DEVELOP ON.

I WOULD PREFER THAT IT BE MORE ACCEPTING OF 8 TO 10,000 SQUARE FEET ON THE EXTERIOR, AND 7,000 ON THE INTERIOR LOTS.

TE AVERAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE AREA IS ACTUALLY CLOSER TO 2200 SQUARE FEET. THE AVERAGE LOT SIZE ACTUALLY CLOSER TO SF-8, WHICH IS STILL BELOW THE AVERAGE TO MY KNOWLEDGE. I UNDERSTAND THAT LAND IS GETTING EXPENSIVE, AND IT'S THE REASON THAT WE ARE SEEING A LOT MORE SF-5 PRESENTATIONS. HOWEVER THIS IS A PREMIUM LOT.

IT'S OPENING TO THE LAKE, GUYS, WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE PROTECT ROWLETT'S FUTURE NOT IMMEDIATE GAINS.

YES, BUILDERS ARE BUILDING BIGGER HOMES ON SMALLER LOTS.

THAT'S BEEN A TREND FOR DECADES. BUT DUE TO THE INCREASE IN HOME PRICES, I'VE SEEN MORE OF A TREND AND DEMAND TO GO BACK TO LARGER LOTS. THIS WAS AGAIN IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION I WOULD CONSIDER. I MADE A RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE A LESSER LOCATION WITH SIMILAR DESIGN THAT WAS DE /* DENIED BY MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS.

IT IS A HEAD SCRATCHER TO SEE SOME INCONSISTENCIES, AND SO I

WILL NOT BE APPROVING THIS. >> MR. SWIFT.

>> THIS 1 IS A TOUGH 1. WE'VE ALL SPENT SOME TIME ON THIS 1 UP THERE. I'VE GONE BACK AND FORTH 5 OR 6 TIMES ON THIS WILL CALL TONIGHT ALONE OUT THERE.

A, I THINK THAT IT'S MET SOME OF THE REQUESTS THAT THE PNZHAS MADE FROM THE DEVELOPER OUT THERE.

IT'S ONE PART IT'S A GOOD FIT FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

IT MAY NOT MEET ALL OF THE SQUARE FOOTAGE PIECES OUT THERE AS WELL. ULTIULTIMATELY MY DECISION, AMANY GOING TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF THIS.

AND REALLY FROM THE STAFF, AND HEARING FROM THE COMMUNITY HERE TONIGHT. AND THAT'S WHO WE ARE REAR TO RECOMMEND THE CITIZENS OF ROWLETT, WE HEARD FROM THEM LOUD AND CLEAR. I WILL BE VOTING IN FAVOR

TONIGHT. >> THANK YOU

>> A LOT OF THEM WERE CHURCH MEMBERS.

>> I WOULD LIKE TO CLIMB IN A LITTLE BIT.

I COME FROM A LARGER LOT WORLD BACK IN THE DAY.

BUT IT IS WHAT THEY ARE BUILDING THESE DAYS.

THEY ARE BUILDING BIGGER HOUSES ON SMALLER LOTS.

THIS IS KIND OF A LITTLE BIT OF AN ODD-SHAPED PIECE OF PROPERTY.

THEY'VE DONE SOME MANY INTERESTING THINGS TO MAKE IT INCREASE THE AMENITIES FOR THE PEOPLE THAT WILL LIVE IN THE COMMUNITY. OBVIOUSLY THERE'S A CHURCH THAT'S GOING TO BE BUILT AS PART OF ALL OF THIS.

I GENERALLY JUST GO ALONG WITH THE CITY'S RECOMMENDATION AND THEIR POINTS OF HOW THEY GOT HAPPY WITH IT, AND SO I WILL BE VOTING IN FAVOR OF IT MYSELF. SO IF THERE'S NO MORE COMMENTS.

I THINK THAT WE ARE READY TO VOTE, ON THE MR. COTE'S MOTION.

[02:05:08]

WE'VE GOT MR. WINTON, COTE, ESTEVEZ, ENTROP MANY, SWIFT AND ENGEN ALL IN FAVOR. ALL OPPOSED?

PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND. >> AND WE HAVE MR. SEGARS OPPOSED. SO THAT PASSES.

[5D. Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation to City Council on a request by Marc English, Sapphire Bay Land Holdings, LLC, regarding an amendment to the existing Regulating Plan and Major Warrants to Article 2.4 Urban Village (UV) District standards, Article 2.8 Building Types, Article 2.10 Streets, Article 3 Parking, Article 4 Lighting, Article 5 Signs, Appendix 1.1 Table of Allowed Uses, and Appendix 2 Design Standards, on property zoned Form-Based Bayside Special District (FB-BS) District. The 116.93-acre site is located south of Interstate 30 (IH-30), in the City of Rowlett, Dallas County and Rockwall County, Texas.]

ARTICLE 3 PARKING. ARTICLE 4 LIGHTING, AND TABLE OF ALLOWED USES AND APPENDIX 2 DESIGN STANDARDS ON PROPERTY ZONED FORM-BASED BAYSIDE SPECIAL DISTRICT SBBSDISTRICT.

THE 116.93 ACRE SITE IS LOCATED SOUTH OF INTERSTATE 30.

IH, 30 IN THE CITY OF DALLAS COUNTY, AND ROCKWALL COUNTY

TEXAS. >> I WILL BE PRESENTING THIS 1 MS. ESTEVEZ. THANK YOU.

>> GO AHEAD. >> GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS, AND OUR VIEWING AUDIENCE. THE REQUEST BEFORE US TONIGHT IS FOR A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING AN AMENDMENT TO THE REGULATING PLAN FOR THE SAPPHIRE BY DEVELOPMENT AND ASSOCIATED MAJOR WARRANTS. BY WAY OF HISTORY ESPECIAL WILL I FOR SOME OF OUR NEW COMMISSIONERS, AND OUR VIEWING AUDIENCE. THE MAP IN FRONT OF YOU ON THE SCREEN IDENTIFIES THE FULL BAYSIDE SPECIAL DISTRICT HOWEVER UPON IT'S PROOFAL IN 2015 AFTER DETERMINING OR ESTABLISHING THE NETWORK, FROM HIKE AND BIKE CORRIDORS, AND TRAIL SYSTEMS AND SOLES THE USES, THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE RELATIONSHIP TO THE DEVELOPMENT, THE PORTION TO THE SOUTH SHOWN IN ORANGE WAS PURCHASED BY AFTER FIRE BAY LAND HOLDINGS, AT WHICH TIME THE CITY ENTERED INTO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH THIS DEVELOPER, AND NOW THEY ARE FINE TUNING THEIR APPLICATION, NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA. SEA RELEVANT LATING PLAN WAS APPROVED IN JANUARY, ALMOST A YEAR NOW TO DATE.

AND WITH THAT SOME MAJOR WARRANTS WERE APPROVED WITH IT, THAT WAS TO DETERMINE FROM A MASTER PLANNING EXERCISE, HOW THE PIECES OF THE PUZZLE WOULD FIT TOGETHER IN RELATIONSHIP TO WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED WITH THIS MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT WITH THE HOTEL, THE CONVENTION CENTER OF COURSE AND THE OTHERANCE LARRY USES. IF YOU'VE DRIVEN BY THE SITE, YOU CAN SEE THAT THE DEVELOPER HAS BEEN'S HAT WORK ON THIS SITE, INFRASTRUCTURE YOU INSTALLATION IS WELL UNDERWAY.

AND NOW WE ARE IN A PLACE WHERE AMENDMENTS TO THE REGULATING PLAN AND FORM BASED CODE REQUIREMENTS ARE BEING PROPOSED BECAUSE NOW THE DEVELOPER IS AT THEIR NEXT STAGE WHERE THEY ARE FORM LICENSING POTENTIAL USES FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT, SO TO CLOSE ON THIS, IN SUMMARY BY WAY OF INTRODUCTION, AND HISTORY THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE REGULATING PLAN CONTAINS REQUESTS FOR MAJOR WARRANTS YOU GENERALLY RELATING TO DISTRICT SIGNAGE, TRAIL WIDTHS, TRAIL LIGHTING LEVELS, SIDEWALK WIDTHS, PARKING AND DRIVE THROUGH USES AND THE PERMITS FOR GAS PUMPS AND TRADITIONAL DESIGN STANDARDS.

THIS IS SUCH ALARM DEVELOPMENT MANY OR A DEVELOPMENT OF THIS SCALE AS THEY START REALIZING ELEMENTS TO REALIZING I BEG YOUR PARDON AS THEY REALIZE THE DEVELOPMENT ELEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS MASTER PLANNING EXERCISE.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE LAURA. >> THE SITE IS APPROXIMATELY 117 ACRES AS YOU CAN SEE. IT SHARES FRONT

>> A WITH THE LIKE IT SELF. LAKE RAY A HUBBARD AS WELL AS I 30. ACCESS TO THE SITE IS CURRENTLY OFF OF CLINTON DRIVE AND DALROCK ROAD.

THE SITE IS BEING MANY CLEARED FOR INFRASTRUCTURE IS BEING IN THE PROCESS OF BEING INSTALLED. THE ROADWAYS, WATER AND SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE HAS ALREADY BEEN REALIZED IN FACT.

[02:10:01]

>> AGAIN, SUBSTANTIAL IN PROOF. >> FOR THE SEGMENT OF I 30 THAT FRONT THIS DEVELOPMENT HAVE BEEN APPROVED, AND TECS DOT, ANTICIPATE THE SITE INFRASTRUCTURE IMMINENTLY SOON.

COMMISSIONERS AS SOME OF YOU RECALL THE JANUARY 7TH MEETING LAST YEAR, COUNCIL APPROVED SPECIFIC MAJOR WARRANTS AND THE REGULATING PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT.

OF COURSE OF THAT CAME BEFORE YOU FOR YOUR RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN ADVANCE OF THIS MEETING.

THERE WERE 4 SPECIFIC MAJOR WARRANTS THAT WERE APPROVED AND AS WE GO THROUGH THIS, THE INTENTION IS TO BUILD THE EXPLANATION OR RATHER THE NARRATIVE AS TO WHY WE ARE WHERE WE ARE TODAY. AS YOU CAN SEE ON THIS SCREEN IN FRONT OF YOU. THERE'S AN ILLUSTRATION THAT IS NUMBERED 1 THROUGH 4, AND THOSE ARE THE 4 MAJOR WARRANTS THAT WERE APPROVED AS PART OF THE ORIGINAL REGULATING PLAN.

THE FIRST MAJOR WARRANT WAS TO ALLOW PARKING LOTS TO DOMINATE THE STREETSCAPE, WHERE YOU CAN SEE NUMBER 4, AND YOU CAN SEE NUMBER 1. ESPECIALLY WHERE YOU SEE NUMBER 1, YOU WILL SEE THAT THE STREETSCAPE AND PUBLIC REALM LOCATIONS IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE REST OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND SO THAT MAJOR WARRANT WAS TO ALLOW PARKING LOTS TO DOMINATE THE STREETSCAPE. THE SECOND MAJOR WARRANT WAS TO ALLOW PARKING LOTS ALONG THE STREETS WHERE PARKING BEHIND BUILDINGS IS NOT POSSIBLE OR PRACTICAL DUE TO PHYSICAL CONSTRAINTS. THE THIRD MAJOR WARRANT WAS TO ALLOW FRONT ENTRY GARAGE ACCESS FROM THE INTERNAL ROADWAYS, AND YOU SEEK THAT ON 3 ON YOUR SCREEN ON THE ILL WILLSTRATION, AND THE FOURTH MAJOR WARRANT WAS TO ALLOW THE NORTHERN THEATER BLOCK OR BUILDING AS WE CALL IT NUMBER FOUR TO BACK ON TRAILS AND PARKS. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA.

>> SO IF YOU RECALL, COMMISSIONERS ARES I MENTIONED THAT USE THE PROGRAM HAS PROGRESSED THE NEED TO HAVE MORE SPECIF SPECISP HAD SPECIOF FISTITY. IT HAS BEEN RETHERE'S TWO IMAGES, ONE THAT SAYS APPROVED AND ONES THAT PROPOSED THAT SHOWS A REALIGNMENT, OR SPATIAL PERSPECTIVE.

YOU CAN SEE THE LARGER BIG BUILDING OR BOXES THAT BEEN BROKEN UP AS WELL AS SOME CHANGES TO THE INTERIOR OF THAT PARCEL ITSELF. SO ONLINE WITH THAT, IF YOU PEEK MORE CLOSELY AT THE PROPOSED REGULATING PLAN.

YOU CAN SEE THAT THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING SOME DRIVE-THROUGH APPLICATIONS, 3 POTENTIAL DRIVE-THROUGH RESTAURANTS, AS WELL AS RETAIL AND RESTAURANT ELEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH 12 GAS PUMPS THESE 2 USES OF COURSE REQUIRE APPROVAL OF A MAJOR WARRANT. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA.

>> ING. THE OTHER PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE REGULATING PLAN THAT WE ARE GOING TO DIVE INTO TONIGHT, ARE THE TOWN HOME USES. IF YOU SEE THE APPROVED PROGRAM, YOU SEE A YELLOW AND A GREEN BOX.

THE YELLOW BOX IS AN APPROVED ROW OF TOWN HOMES, AND YOU CAN SEE THAT'S BECOME MORE WITH THIS PROPOSAL IN TERMS OF - AMENDMENTS, SO INITIALLY THERE WERINATED 16 TOWN HOMES, ALONG THE LAKEFRONT AND, AND INCREASED TO 47 TOWN HOMES.

AS A RESULT OF THIS INCREASE, THERE'S BEEN A REDUCTION OF A PROPOSED 2 ACRE OFFICE SITE, AND A REDUCTION TO THE PROPOSED OPEN SPACE, WHICH INCLUDED THE KITE AND SURF PARK, SO THAT CHANGED OR DIFFERENTIAL IN ACREAGE DOES REQUIRE AN AMENDMENT TO THE REGULATING PLAN. HOWEVER, UPON SPEAKING TO THE APPLICANT, AND THEY ARE HERE TONIGHT TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE OR FOLLOWUP WITH THIS PRESENTATION IS THAT ALTHOUGH THAT SURF OF KITE PARK AS IT WAS ORIGINALLY KNOWN HAS BEEN PROPOSE THE, THERE'S ADDITIONAL GREEN SPACE ALONG THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE THAT CAN ACCOMMODATE KITE SURFING AND THEY ARE CONFIDENT THAT THAT USE WILL NOT BE COMPROMISED HOWEVER THE INTENT OF MAINTAINING THE OPEN SPACE HAS NOT BEEN COMPROMISED WITH THE PROPOSED REGULATING PLAN.

>> NEXT SLIDE, LAURA. ANOTHER ADDITIONAL UPDATE.

AND JUST TO JOG EVERYBODY ANSWER MEMORY.

THE ORIGINAL REGULATING PLAN WAS APPROVED WITH A 4.4 ACRE TRACT OF MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT, A LARGE BELONG OF MULTIFAMILY

[02:15:03]

THIS WILL CHANGE WILL HAVE A MINOR IMPACT ON THE CHARACTER SO TO SPEAK ON THE ZONE AND OVERALL MASS REDUCTION IS EXPECTED IN BUILDING AREA FROM A USE PERSPECTIVE THERE ARE NO INCOME PARTICULA /* /* INCOME

PARTICULARABILITIES. >> YOU CAN SEE THAT.

>>. YOU CAN SEE SOME REDUCED MULTIFAMILIES, REPLACING WITH THEM WITH TOWN HOMES, AND SEEING THEM IN THE NORTHERN BLOCK OF I 30.

SEEING A MORE REDEFINED USE OF BUSINESS SPACE AS WELL.

NEXT BE SLIDE, LAURA. 1 OF THE.

AS I MENTIONED THIS IS A MASTER PLAN PROGRAM.

WILL GIVEN ITS SIZE, SCALE AND GIVEN THE MARKET THAT IT'S ATTRACTING THIS IS A TOURIST DESTIN NATION, NOT JUST REGIONALLY, BUT HOPEFULLY POTENTIALLY NATIONALLY.

THE GIVEN THE SCALE OF THE DEVELOPMENT MANY, GIVEN THE VIRTUAL INTEGRATION OF LAND USES.

AS PART OF THE PROPOSAL, THE SIGN PACKAGE, ACCORDING TO THE - FORM BE-BASED CODE IF THERE IS A SIGN PACKAGE, OR SIGN CRITERIA THAT ARE NOT COMMENSURATE WITH THE FORM-BASED CODE MAIN OR WARRANTS ARE REQUIRED. ALTHOUGH IT WAS A HEAVY READ I AM SURE COMMISSIONERS, WE DID INCLUDE THE MASTER SIGN PACKAGE, WHAT THESE SIGNS ARE AND WHAT THEY MEAN TO THE DEVELOPMENT OR FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. SO FROM A SKELETON PERFECT I HAVE WHICH IS THE BEST WAY TO PUT TO THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A NUMBER OF FREESTANDING SIGNS AND PROPOSING

SOME BUILDING SIGNS. >> SO LET'S TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE FREESTANDING SIGNS THAT THEY ARE PROPOSING.

THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A NUMBER OF FREESTANDING SIGNS TO PRIMARILY CAPTURE THE CHARACTER OF THIS DEVELOPMENT.

NOT FROM A PEDESTRIAN ABILITY STANDPOINT, DEFINITELY WHEN YOU ARE IN THE DEVELOPMENT. BUT ALSO HAVE A VEHICULAR STANDPOINT GIVEN THE ENHANCEMENT MANY OF I 30, OF TRAFFIC ASSOCIATED WITH THAT, AND THEN AS THE DEVELOPMENT BUILDS OUT THE ROLE IS TO CAPTURE THAT AUDIENCE.

MOST FREQUENT SIGN THAT WOULD LIKELY BE SEEN ON THAT PROPERTY IS THE 50 FOOT TALL DIGITAL TOTE EMSIGNS.

THOSE ARE YOU LONG THE RING ROAD THE SITE PLAN THAT YOU SAW TO CAPTURE THE MIDDLE OF THE SPINE AREA IN THE DEVELOPMENT.

THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY 83 OF THOSE SIGNS.

EACH 1 OF THOSE SIGNS IS 220 SQUARE FEET OF SCREEN FACE, AND I SAY SCREEN FACE, BECAUSE THESE ARE SIGNS.

THE MASTER SIGNAGE CONSISTS OF A TOTAL OF 143 STANDING SIGNS.

>> THEY RANGE IN SIZE FROM 13 SQUARE FEET TO 900 SQUARE FEET.

YOU CAN IMAGINE THAT THAT SIGNAGE, ARE WILL BE INFORMATIONAL SIGNING, AND THE GOAL THAT THE DESIGNER PRESENTED TO US WAS TO HAVE A COHESIVE SIGN PACKAGE, AND TO HAVE INTENDED ARCTIC BE TOURALLY DESIGNED SPECIFIC SIGNS, AND THAT IS THE SIGN PACKAGE THAT IS DIDN'T KNOWCLUDED IN YOUR BACK THE TODAY. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE, LAURA

>> AS WE CONTINUE TO TALK ABOUT THE MASTER SIGN PACKAGE, I THINK THAT IT'S IMPORTANT TO ALSO DISCUSS BUILDING MONUMENT SIGNAGE THAT THEY ARE PROPOSING. AND IF YOU RECALL ON.

THE DEVELOPMENT ITSELF HAS SO MANY MANY FEATURES, SUCH AS THE SURF PARK ITSELF, THE CONCERT VENUE.

SO THE GOAL IS TO HAVE BUILDING MONUMENT SIGNAGE THAT ADVERTISES THESE EVENT SPACES AND WILL BE ON THESE EVENT SPACES SO THESE DIGITAL PANELS WILL HAVE TO ESTABLISH THE CORNERS OF THE BUILDINGS AS WELL. THAT INVITE AND DIRECT THE PEDESTRIANS TOWARD THE LAGOON AMENITIES, A VERY VIBRANT COMMUNITY, AND THE SIGNAGE TO GO HAND IN HAND WITH THAT.

IN SOME RESPECTS SOME OF THE SIGNAGE THAT THEY'VE DISCUSSED ESPECIALLY WITH THE FREESTANDING SIGN.

SOME OF IT WILL BE ARCHITECTURAL SIGNAGE.

JUST ARCHITECTURE WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT.

. AS I MENTIONED TO YOU EARLIER, THE PROPOSED SIGNS WILL BE FOR THE SKELETON OF THE DEVELOPMENT, AND THEN ARE NOT INTENDED TO SUBSTITUTE INDIVIDUAL TENANT OR BUSINESS SIGNAGE, BUT THEY JUST SERVE THE GREATER DEVELOPMENT ITSELF. SO WHEN INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENTS COME IN, OR WHEN IT'S A SPECIFIC ENVELOPE THAT'S BEING DEVELOPED.

[02:20:04]

SO WE DISCUSSED A NUMBER OF ELEMENTS RELATED TO THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT AND THE SIGNAGE, WE WILL HONE IN AND BECOME MORE DELIBERATE WITH THE REST OF THE PRESENTATION COMMISSIONERS.

THE PART OF A MAJOR WARRANT IS REQUESTING A REDUCTION IN THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR A TRAIL.

WHEN THIS DEVELOPMENT WAS APPROVED WITH THE REGULATING PLAN, THE PERIMETER OF THE SIGH CONTAINED OR ILLUSTRATED A TRIAL. THIS TRAIL WAS REFLECTED AS 10 FEET E AND IT'S SHOWN IN RED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A REDUCTION OF THIS TRAIL WIDTH FROM 12 FEET TO 10 FEET, AND HAVE A VARIABLE TRAIL WIDTH OF 8 FEET WHEN THE DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS REQUIRE A TIGHTER CONFIGURATION ARES SUCH AS THE TOWN HOMES THAT YOU CAN SEE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OR OR CORN BEER OF THIS DEVELOPMENT, AND AS I MENTIONED THE PHFORM-BASED COO DETAILS WHAT THE TRAIL WIDTHS ARE.

THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PARKS AND TRAIL PLANTS, SPECIFIES TRAIL WIDTHS TO BE IN AN UP IN UP MINIMUM YOU HAVE 10 TO 12 FEET. IN THE MASTER PLAN, 10 TO 12 FEET. STAFF IS AMENABLE OF A TRIAL REDUCTION OF 10 FEET TO 4 FEET. NO LESS THAN THAT.

ANOTHER ELEMENT OF THE MAJOR WARRANT IS THE REDUCTION OF THE SIDEWALK WIDTH. THE FORM-BASED CODE IS VERY SPECIFIC WITH THE MINIMUM SPECIFIC ARE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. FORM-BASED CODE IT REQUIRES THAT A SIDEWALK IS REQUIRED ALONG ALL OF THE FLEX BASED BUILDINGS, 12 FOOT REQUIREMENT IS REQUIRED ON BUILDINGS THAT ARE 3 OR MORE STORIES IN HEIGHT. THE APPLICANT IS REVIEWING THEIR PROGRAM, THEIR SITE PLANNING COMPONENTS, AND WITH THAT, THEY ARE PROPOSING TO INSTALL AN 8 TO 10 FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG THE NORTHERN PORTION OF MEGAN ELYSE DRIVE.

THE WESTERN PORTION OF KATIE DRIVE, AND I WILL SHOW YOU ON THAT A PLAN IN JUST A SECOND. THE SOUTHERN PORTIONS OF OF THE AFTER FIRE PLAZA AND THE IN THE TIERIORS OF THE OPEN SPACE THAT YOU HAVE. THE REMAINDER OF THE DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO PROVIDE A 13 FOOT PAVED CONDITION WITH THE REGULARLY SPACED TREE WELLS, BE ALTHOUGH THE CLEAR SIDEWALK WIDTH WILL BE 67 FEET IN WIDTH. THE SPACE WILL NOT BECOME PROMILESED AS IT RELATES TO PEDESTRIAN CONNECT BEIVITY.

SO GIVEN THIS INSTANCE THE PROPOSAL DOES MEET THE INTENT OF

THE FORM-BASED CODE. >> WE TALKED A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE DRIVE THROUGHS, REQUESTING A MAJOR WARRANT TO ALLOW THIS USE.

THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING THAT THE USE BE PERMITTED FOR UP TO 3 DRIVE-THROUGHS ON THE NORTHERN TRACTS.

THE YOU CAN SEE THAT ON THE SCREEN IN FRONT OF YOU.

AND THIS CONDITION WILL REQUIRE, AND WE'VE SPOKEN TO THE APPLICANT ABOUT THIS, AND THEY ARE AMENABLE TO MAKE SURE THAT THE STACKING AREA FOR VEHICLES DOES NOT OCCUR ALONG THE RIGHT OF WAY, OR ALONG THE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR.

ALL OF THAT WOULD BE LITERALLY INTERIOR TO THE SITE AND ALL THAT DRIVE AISLES WILL BE APPROPRIATELY SCREENED TO PROVIDE A HEIGHTENED PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE.

THAT'S WHAT I CALL THAT FUNCTION APPEARS A LITTLE INTERNAL TO THE SITE AND DOESN'T COMPROMISE A MASTER LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT WITH THOSE ASSOCIATED USES. AND DOESN'T TAKE AWAY FROM THAT.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA. >> I MENTIONED TO YOU ALSO THAT THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A MAJOR WARRANT TO ALLOW 12 GAS PUMPS WITH A RESTAURANT. THE URBAN VILLAGE DISTRICT IS VERY CLEAR THAT THE MAJOR WARRANT IS REQUIRED TO ALLOW GAS PUMPS. THE DEVELOPER IS SEEKING TO ATTRACT A CONCEPT WITH GAS PUMPS AS AANCE LARRY USE WITH A RESTAURANT TO IT, ALONG THE I 30 ACCESS ROAD.

APPROVAL IS CONDITIONAL WITH IT BEINGANCE LARRY TO TO USE CENTER. GAS PUMPS WOULD AND CITED TO BE SCREENED BY THE BUILDINGS, LOCATED BEHIND THE STRUCTURE WHERE THE FRONT -- THE FRONT WOULD CONSTITUTE AJAMESN ADJACE

[02:25:05]

COMMISSIONERS, THE FORM-BASED CODE ALSO REQUIRES THAT SURFACE PARKING LOTS WHERE APPROVED ADJACENT TO STREETS AND OPEN SPACES BE SCREENED BY STREET TREES PLANTED 25 FEET ON CENTER AND THAT AN IF ARE THE INCH MASONRY WALL OR A METAL PICKET FENCE WITH LOW SHRUBS BE PROVIDED AJACENT TO IT AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE ILLUSTRATION IN FRONT OF YOU.

NOW THE REGULATING PLAN THAT IS ALSO ATTACHED REFLECT A SHADED AREA THAT IS BOXED IN IN RED, AND THE WARRANT REQUEST BEFORE US IS TO WAVE THIS REQUIREMENT THAT I'VE GIST READ OUT FOR THE CONTRACT CONTAINED ALONG THE WESTERN PORTION OF KATIE DRIVE, AND STAFF IS AMENABLE TO THAT TOO BECAUSE DUE TO THE LIMITED AREA WHERE THEY CURES AND SPECIFICITY OF LOCATION, STAFF CONSIDERS THIS REQUEST TO BE APPROPRIATE BECAUSE IT DOESN'T COMPROMISE THE INTENT OF THE REQUIREMENT.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA MANY. >>LAURA.

>> THIS PARCEL IS AN IRRELEVANT SHAPED PLAN, AND THERE ARE SOME CONSTRAINTS SOLED WITH IT. AND 1 OF THE COMMENT AREAS, OR 1 OF THE ELEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FORM-BASED CODE IS TO REQUIRE AT LEAST 60 PERCENT, NO FWRART THAN 80 PERCENT, BUT 60 PERCENT OF WINDOWS OF THE GROUND FLOOR FACADE OF THE COMMERCIAL FRONT AND -- THAT THE FACADE HAS TYPICALLY THE ORDINANCE ALSO REQUIRES IN ESSENCE ARCHITECTURE. DUE TO MANY SO OF THE CAN CONSTRAINTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SITE, AND TO CAPITALIZE ON THE WATER FRONT DUE TO THE 4-SIDE YOU HAD CONDITION THAT I JUST MENTIONED THIS COULD RESULT ON THE PARCEL ALONG THIS WESTERN PORTION OF KATIE DRIVE TO PLACE SOME OF THE MECHANICAL FEATURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE BUILDING, FOR EXAMPLE, SO IT'S DIFFICULT TO PLACE COMPONENTS FOR THE BUILDING IN A MANNER THAT WE DO TRACT FROM THE EXTERIOR VISUAL APPEAL.

THE EAST FRONTAGE OF THAT PARCEL SHOULD A BUILDING DEVELOP THERE WOULD HAVE A REDUCED TRANSPARENCY TO ACCOMMODATE THE SERVICE USES. BUT IT WILL HOWEVER ALLOW THE PRIORITIZATION OF THE LAKEFRONT AND.

ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE IS EXPECTED TO SOFTEN ANY HAD VIEWS OF THAT BUILDING. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA.

>> THE FORM-BASED CODE ALSO REQUIRES BUILDINGS TO BE LOCATED IN THE BUILD 2 ZONE, WHICH IS THAT 18 TO 26 BILLED TO ZONE.

THEY CAN BE NO MORE THAN 26 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.

80 PERCENT OF ANY GIVEN BROOKLINE.

SO THIS PROVIDES SOME VARIATION AND AVOIDS THE CORRIDOR APPROACH. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THAT THIS PROVISION NOT BE APPLICABLE IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A PARKING AREA IN FRONT OF THE PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE.

SO THAT VERY SAME PARCEL THAT I MENTIONED TO YOU, AND MAXIMIZE THE FRONTAGE ALONG THE LAKE FOR THE PARCEL LOCATED ON THIS SITE.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA. ISSUE.

>> ANOTHER MAJOR WARRANT IS REGARDING PARKING LOTS IN FRONT

OF BUILDINGS >>.

THE FORM-BASED CODE DOESN'T ALLOW PARKING LOTS TO DOMINATE THE STREETSCAPE AND PUBLIC CAN REALM, AND REQUIRES PLACEMENT BEHIND THE PRINCIPLE BUILDING DUE TO THE LIMITED LAND AREA, AND THE REQUIREMENT TO FRONT ALONGING 2 STREETS AND THE LADIES AND GENTLEMEN BEING A THIRD FRONTAGE.

THE DESIGN CHALLENGES ASSOCIATED IN MAXIMIZING THE PUBLIC REALM ARE COMPROMISED AND WE FEEL LIKE CAPITALIZING ON THE LAKEFRONT AND CAN WITH THE SPATIAL PROPOSALS OF BUILDING PLACEMENT MANY PROPOSED THAT THIS YOU MAJOR WARRANT IS, IS NOT INAPPROPRIAT. SO THE REQUEST TO PERMIT A SMALL SURFACE PARKING AREA THAT YOU SEE THROUGH THE SOUTHERN END ADJACENT TO THE STREET IS IN FACT REASONABLE.

UNFORTUNATELY, AN UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE OF THIS WARRANT IS THE PLACEMENT WILL OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES THAT YOU CAN SEE SHOWN IN THE YELLOW AREA THERE ALONG THE RIGHT OF WAY.

BUT AGAIN, SOME SCREENING AND SOME APPROPRIATE DESIGN SHOULD

MUTE THAT VITWHAT WILL THAT VIS. >> NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

THE APPLICANT IS ALSO REQUESTING, ASSOCIATED WITH THE SAME PROPERTY THAT WE ARE DEALING WITH, THE SAME PARCEL, A SECRETARY FOOT AMENITY ZONE. THE OF IT REQUIRES A 6 FOOT AMENITY ZONE BETWEEN THE CURB AND THE SIDEWALK.

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST IS TO REMOVE THE AMENITY ZONE ADJACENT TO THE SOUTHERN AND PORTION OF THIS TRACT AS SHOWN IN THE IMAGE

[02:30:02]

ACTIVITY >> 1 OF THE COMPONENTS THAT THE FORM-BASED CODE HAS IS IT REQUIRES 25 PERCENT OF ABOVE GRADE RESIDENTIAL WILL UNITS ADJACENT TO A PUBLIC STREET OR OPEN SPACE TO HAVE BALCONIES THAT EXTEND OUTWARDS AT LEAST 5 FEET BEYOND THE FACE OF THE FACADE.

AGAIN, AS I MENTIONED TO YOU, THIS IS A MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY, AND AS PART OF THAT THE MASTER DEVELOPER HAS DEDICATED AN EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT ALONG STREET FRONTAGES AND SO THERE COULD BE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS, AND THIS PRIVATE EAST EASEMENT, AS AN OPTION, AN ALTERNATIVE THE DEVELOPER IS PROPOSING THAT THE BALCONY REQUIREMENT BE WAIVED TO AVOID THESE CONFLICT. AND YOU INSTEAD USE THE BALCONIES AND USE THEM -- THE APPLICANT HAS INDICATED THE USE OF INSET BALCONIES ALONG THE FACADE.

YOU WOULD STILL HAVE THAT BALCONY FEATURE AND THAT VERY FACADE, AND STILL BE ABLE TO HE GAUGE IN PUBLIC REALM BUT WOULD NOT ENCROACH ON THIS PRIVATE EASEMENT, AS I JUST MENTIONED IN MY LAST CONVERSATION, IT DOES SAY THAT STAFF HAS DETERMINED THAT THIS REQUEST IS AN I PROBLEMEE AT BECAUSE IT WILL STILL ALLOW FOR PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY AND INTERACTION WITH THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND LIFE ON THE STREET.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA. COUNCIL THOSE ARE ALL OF THE MAJOR WARRANTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE AMENDED REGULATING PLAN.

I KNOW THAT WAS AT THE LOT OF INFORMATION TO DIGEST.

PUBLIC NOTICE WAS REQUIRED TO BE SENT PER THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT NOTICE IT WAS SENT WITHIN 200 FOOT RADIUS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. AS A COURTESY, WE ALSO SEND NOTICES WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

NO NOTICES WERE RECEIVED IN OPPOSITION WITHIN THE 200 FOOT NOTICE, RADIUS, AND 1 NOTICE WAS RECEIVED IN OPPOSITION WITHIN THE 500 FOOT NOTICE. AND THAT IS INCLUDED IN YOUR BACK THE. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE, LAURA.

>> BASED ON THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS, THE REGULATING PLAN, THE ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS OR CRITERIA THAT THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING DEVIATIONS TO THE FORM-BASED CODE STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENTS TO THE REGULATING PLAN AND THE REQUESTED MAJOR WARRANTS AND THEY ARE STILL IN KEEPING WITH THE INTENT OF THE FORM-BASED CODE. WITH THAT COUNCIL, I WILL -- OUR NEXT SLIDE LAURA PLEASE, MY QUESTION SLIDE.

>> I WILL TRY TO ENTER AT THAT POINT YOU ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE. IF WE HAVE TO GO BACK TO THE SLIDE DEGREES, HOPEFULLY LAURA WILL BE ABLE TO ASSIST, MARK ENGLISH, AND KENT ARE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, THE APPLICANT SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY OF THEM.

AND WITH THAT I WILL TURN IT OVER TO YOU.

THANK YOU SO MUCH. >> THANK YOUER FOR THE PRESENTATION. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS, STAFF,

COMMISSIONERS. >> I HAVE A QUESTION.

>> ANYBODY. GO AHEAD.

THERE SWIFT. >> THANK YOU.

SO THE LAST SLIDE OUT THERE SAYS THAT STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OUT THERE, AND I HEARD A COUP HE HAVE HAD COUNSEL OF THINGS. OF THE BIKE AND HIKE TRAIL.

>> YES, WITH THE 1 CONDITION, THAT THE TRAIL NOT BE REDUCED BELOW 10 FEET. I APPRECIATE THE CLARIFICATION

>> >> I AM BACK ON MUTE. >> AND TO REITERATE, STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENTS TO THE REGULATING PLAN, AND THE MAJOR WARRANTS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF A REDUCTION OF THE TRAIL TO LESS THAN 10 FEET.

>>. >> OKAY.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF? ANYBODY? AND SO THE APPLICANT, DO YOU HAVE A PRESENTATION FOR US THIS EVENING?

JOHN, GO AHEAD. >> YOU ARE MUTED JOHN.

>>. >>

>>. >> DARN.

I GUESS I SHOULD WAIT UNTIL THE APPLICANT MAKES HIS PRESENTATION

BEFORE I ASK THIS QUESTION. >> SORRY.

[02:35:01]

>>. ON THAT'S OKAY.

SO IF THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT AND WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A PRESENTATION, IT IS YOU WILL COME FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME

AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. >> MY NAME IS MARKING MARC, HE BELISH, APPLINAM IS MARC, ENGLISH ARES I AM 1 OF THE 2 DEVELOPERS FOR THE SAPPHIRE BY PROJECT.

I WOULD LIKE TO THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO PUT FORTH OUR CASE FOR THE SEVERAL MAJOR WARRANTS THAT OUR DEVELOPMENT TEAM IS REQUESTING FOR THE MANY END USERS AND VARIOUS PROPERTY USERS THAT WE WILL HOST. THE AFTER FIRE BY REAL ESTATE HAS SPECIAL CHALLENGES TO ADDRESS AT THE CONTEXT OF THE FORM-BASED CODE AND ITS NUMEROUS REQUIREMENTS.

THE CHALLENGES PUT IN BEFORE YOU AS MAJOR WARRANTS AND SUBMITTED FOR YOUR APPROVAL TONIGHT BECAUSE OF THE VARIOUS SPATIAL CONSTRAINTS AND THE MANY ACUTE SHAPES, AND ACUTE ANGLES OF THE SAPPHIRE BY'S LAND'S LONG THE PENINSULA.

THERE ARE CHALLENGES BECAUSE OF THE PROXIMITY I HAVE OF THE PLANNED SEAWALL AMENITY WHICH HAS BEEN FULLY APPROVED AND PERMITTED BY THE UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND THE DALLAS WATER UTILITIES THAT WE WILL BEGIN CONSTRUCTION UPON WITHIN THE NEXT FEW WEEKS. THAT WILL PROTECT AND PRESERVE THE SAPPHIRE BY LANDS AND ITS VARIOUS PROPERTY USES FROM CONSTANT EROSION FROM THE LAKE HUBBARD RESERVOIR, AND THE PHYSICAL DESIGN FEATURES OF THE WESTERN MOST TRAIL SYSTEM THAT HAS BEEN DESIGNED BY OUR TEAM'S LAND PLANNING CONSULTANTS.

THAT IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE BAY SIDE SOUTH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED IN THE PAST BY THE CITY OF ROWLETT. IT WILL BE A MAJOR TOURIST ATTRACTION THE WAY THAT WE PLANNED IT.

THIS IS THE ONLY PROJECT IN MY THAT BASICALLY WE HAVE CAST VERY BEST PLANNERS IN THE H THE- NATION.

THE REASON THAT YOU ARE GOING TO SEE THE AMOUNT OF SIGNAGE WARRANTS WOULD BE BECAUSE WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF PEOPLE IN EXCESS OF ONCE WE REACH STABILIZATION OF 119,000 PEOPLE PER WEEK OUT THERE, WE ARE GOING TO NEED TO WEIGH FINDING FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND AND THE TOURISTS THAT ARE GOING TO COME FROM OUT OF STATE. I THINK THAT MY PARTNER KENT CAN

TAKE IT FROM HERE. >> THAT HE AT BASIS OF THE REASON THAT WE ARE HERE FOR THESE WARRANTS.

>> THANK YOU FOR HAVING US THIS EVENING.

WE DON'T HAVE AN ADDITION TO THE PRESENTATION, THAT THEY PUT TOGETHER, AND THEY DID A GREAT JOB, AND FIGURED THAT WAS ALREADY A LITTLE BIT OF OVERLOAD FOR YOU.

BUT WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS RELATED TO THEIR

PRESENTATIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. >> THANK YOU, SIR.

COMMISSIONERS ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANTS, EITHER GENTLEMAN. GO AHEAD MR. COTE

>> WHEN HE IT COMES TO THE OVERALL PROJECT, ASIDE FROM THESE WARRANTS DO YOU THINK THAT YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE ANYTHING IN THE FUTURE ANY FURTHER WARRANTS IN THE FUTURE? SPECIFICALLY I AM INTERESTED IN THE RESIDENTIAL SIDE.

>> NO. >> THERE'S ALWAYS A POSSIBILITY TO HAVE ADDITIONAL WARRANTS AS YOU PROCEED WITH DEVELOPMENT, BUT I THINK THAT FROM IT A RESIDENTIAL WILL STANDPOINT, WE'VE ADDRESSED PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHING THAT WE COULD THINK OF. THE ONLY MAJOR WARRANT RELATED TO RESIDENTIAL WAS THE FRONTAGE GARAGES ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY AND THAT WAS WITH DUE TO A CONSTRAINT REALLY OF THE LAND AN AND YOU DIDN'T WANT TO BACK UP GARAGES TO THE

LAKE. >> MANY OTHER THAN THAT, I DON'T SEE ANYTHING THAT WE HAVEN'T ALREADY ADDRESSED RELATED TO

RESIDENTIAL. >> THANK YOU.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS COMMISSIONERS FOR APPLICANTS?

GO AHEAD. >> I'VE GOT A QUESTION SPECIFICALLY ABOUT THE RESTAURANT AND GAS STATION AND NOT THAT I AM MANY OPPOSED TO IT.

WHEN I HEAR RESTAURANT AND GAS STATION, I PICTURE TRUCK STOP AND I KNOW THAT'S DEFINITELY WHAT THE PLAN IS

>> RUDY'S BARBECUE? >> DON'T KNOW IT.

>> IT'S A CONCEPT, BUT IT'S PRETTY POPULAR HERE IN THE

SOUTHEAST, SOUTH, SOUTHEAST. >> THAT'S A GOOD CONCEPT.

>> I WILL DO MY HOMEWORK, THANK YOU.

>> THERE'S 1 OVER ALL OF NEAR IN ALLEN, OR.

>> RIGHT BY CABELLA'S, ARE THEY A RESTAURANT GAS STATION,

EVERYWHERE? >> THEY ARE.

IT'S A UNIQUE CONCEPT. WE ARE NOT LOOKING TO PUT A C STORE. THAT IS A PARTICULAR USE THAT LIKES TO HAVE A GAS AND DRIVE-THROUGH COMPONENT.

I THINK THAT IT WOULD BE FUN FOR THE PROJECT AS WELL AS THE

[02:40:03]

MARINA. >> GREAT GRAB AND GO OPPORTUNITY. AND OPPORTUNITY TO FUEL UP AT

THE SAME TIME. >> I HAVE A QUICK QUESTION.

>> SURE. >> DID I INTERRUPT SOMEBODY? I REMEMBER THE ORIGINAL, THE NIGHT THAT Y'ALL, BE I DON'T KNOW IF EXACTLY IF IT WAS Y'ALL'S PRESENTATION THAT CAME OUT AND ALL OF THE PEOPLE FROM THE KITE SURFING GROUP HERE IN DALLAS CAME TO THE MEETING. DRESSED ALIKE AND THEY SAID I KNOW THAT YOU DON'T HAVE TO DO IT.

AND THEY WENT TO GREAT DETAIL EXPLAINING HOW THAT A PENINSULA IS JUST THE PERFECT PLACE FOR ALL OF THE COMPONENTS OF EVERYTHING COMING TOGETHER AND MAKING IT SUCH A GREAT PLACE TO KITE SURF, AND I NOTICE THAT YOU ARE REDUCING AREA THAT YOU HAD ORIGINALLY PLANNED FOR THAT. AND THE WAY THEY EXPLAINED IT, THEY SAW IT AS KIND OF A DRAW MAYBE PEOPLE WOULD THINK IT'S COOL AND COME OUT TO WATCH. SO HOW MANY FEET ARE THEY GOING TO HAVE NOW? I CAN'T REALLY TELL BY LOOKING AT YOUR PLAN I AM WILL JUST KIND OF CURIOUS

>> THEY ARE FRIENDS, AND THIS HE EVER A HE BEEN WITH US EVERY STEP OF THE WAY, FOR THE LAST 5 YEARS OR SO THAT THIS HAS BECOME DE PARKED AND SO FORTH. WHAT WE'VE DONE IS KEPT THE RUNWAY LENGTH FOR THAT, AND I'VE PRESENTED THEM EVERYTHING.

SO THEY KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON. THEY'VE GOT PLENTY OF RUNWAY TO GET INTO THE WATER. BUT THEIR OTHER CHALLENGE WAS THAT THEY WANTED OTHER STOPS ALONG THE WESTERN EDGE TO BE ABLE TO EXIT. SO KITE SURFING IS HARD TO GET EXACTLY THE SPOT THAT YOU NEED TO BE, AND WE PROGRAMMED 3 OTHER LAWN ZONES FOR KITE SURFING ALONG THE WESTERN EDGE TRAIL SYSTEM. SO THEY'VE GOT SHE SPOTS TO LAND

AS OPPOSED TO JUST 1 LARGER 1 >> THAT'S INTERESTING.

>> I APPRECIATE YOU DOING THAT. MY HUSBAND IS INTO THAT, AND EVERY TIME WE ALWAYS SAW THEM OUT THERE, AND OF COURSE THEY WERE GONE. AND WE'D LOVE TO SEE THEM COME

BACK. >> IT'S FUN TO WATCH.

IT IS AN EVENT JUST TO SIT OUT THERE AND WATCH THEM GOING UP 30

FEET IN THE AIR AND SO FORTH. >> YEAH.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS COMMENTS GO AHEAD, JOHN.

>> THERE WAS A COMMENT RIGHT BEFORE YOURS, LISA WHERE SOMEBODY HAD SAID THIS WAS A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO GAS UP AND

GRAB AND GO. >> I THINK THAT THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT THE BOATERS FOR THE MARINA

>> THE MARINA IS RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET.

>> RIGHT. SO THIS GAS STATION RESTAURANT WAS A GOOD PLACE TO GAS UP AND GRAB AND GO?

>> TO GRAB SOME BARTKO DUE AND HEAD TO YOUR BOAT.

IT'S NOT A CONVENIENCE STORE. >> NO NO YOU CAN GRAB YOUR BARBECUE AND HEAD OUT TO THE MARINA.

>> CAN GO YOU GO IN TO EAT? >> YES.

>> IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE, JOHN? >> NO, I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY

THAT. >> I WAS TOLD IT WAS A

RESTAURANT. >> IF THERE ARE NO MORE COMMENTS RIGHT NOW. WE WILL GO AHEAD AND OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND I WILL TURN IT OVER TO YOU, LAURA.

>> I DON'T HAVE ANY CALLERS, MA'AM.

>> OKAY, SUSAN, HAVE YOU GOT ANYTHING TO READ?

>> I DO NOT HAVE ANY COMMENTS. >> OKAY.

WELL WE WILL THEN CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

AND I UP READY FOR SOME DISCUSSION OR A MOTION FROM THE

COMMISSIONERS. >> I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION.

>> THERE ENGEN. >> I WOULD LIKE TO RECOMMEND WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE REGULATING PLAN, AND THE

REQUESTED MAJOR WARRANTS. >> OKAY.

>> DID YOU WANT TO INCLUDE THE COMMENT MINAUL, MADE ABOUT IT'S

FO >> YOU THE 1 SPECIFIC AREA.

>> TO INCLUDE THE 1 SPECIFIC AREA THAT STAFF RECOMMENDED TO US, THAT WOULD BE AN 8 FOOT WIDE --

[02:45:04]

>> I THINK THAT YOU ARE CONFUSED.

>> DO YOU WANT TO GO AHEAD AND EXPLAIN THAT 1 MORE TIME WHAT THE CITY'S STANCE WAS ON THAT 1 AREA?

>> YES >> CHAIR PERSON ESTEVEZ.

STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS NOT TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM TRAIL WIDTH REQUIREMENT TO LESS THAN 10 FEET.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A MAJOR WARRANT TO THAT TO ALLOW A VARIABLE WIDTH ALONG THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE, AND PINCH POINTS

TO REDUCE IT TO 8 FEET. >> BUT YOU ARE RECOMMENDING TO

NOT GO BELOW 10 FEET WIDE? >> THAT'S CORRECT

>> IT'S UP TO YOU MARC, BUT I JUST DIDN'T WANT TO FORGET ABOUT

IT >> I WOULD LIKE TO SAY IT AGAIN, I WOULD LIKE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REGULAR PLATING PLAN AND AND THE REQUESTED MAJOR WARRANTS AND THE 1 SPECIFIC AREA DETAILED BY CITY STAFF THAT THE SIDEWALK NOT BE LESS THAN 10

FEET IN WIDTH. >> OKAY.

WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION.

DO WE HAVE A SECOND? >> SECOND.

>> WILL WE HAVE A SECOND BY MR. WINTON.

AND I WOULD LIKE TO GO AROUND AND GET COMMENTS FROM EVERYBODY.

LET'S START WITH YOU, ROBERT. >> I THINK THAT EVERYTHING LOOKS GOOD OUT HERE AS WELL. THE OF THIS IS JUST A COMMENT.

OF I AM GOING TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF WHAT WE HAVE IN FRONT OF US

FOR THE DEVELOPERS. >> I HATE TO JUST KEEP TALKING ABOUT A TRIAL. BUT IT'S A BIKE AND HIKE TRAIL OUT THERE. AND THE OTHER PORTIONS OF THAT TRAIL ARE ALREADY BUILT, AND AT 12 FEET.

I WOULD HATE TO SEE SOMETHING LIKE SAPPHIRE BY HAVE SOMETHING SMALLER. THIS IS THE BEST THING WE'VE GOT GOING IN ROWLETT. MANY I WOULD LIKE TO SEE EVERY PIECE MATCHUP TO THAT. I THAT BEING SAID I WILL VOTE IN

FAVOR TODAY >> THANK YOU, MR. SWIFT.

>> MR. WINTON. >>.

>> MR. WINTON, YOU WANT TO COMMENT ON THIS 1 BEFORE WE

VOTE? >> NO COMMENT.

>>. >>.

>> MR. ENGEN? CAN YOU HEAR ME?

>> I AM EXCITED. WE UNDERSTAND THAT THERE ARE ARE GOING TO BE DIFFICULT SITUATIONS THAT THEY HAVE TO DEAL WITH.

I'M LIKE COMMISSIONER SWIFT. IF WE CAN SAY THE 12 FEET POSSIBLE WITH THE DEVELOPER, WE WOULD GREATLY APPRECIATE THAT.

I KNOW THAT THERE ARE SOME REALLY TIGHT SPOTS THAT YOU HAVE TO DEAL WITH. BUT-IT WOULD ALIGN WITH THE BAYSIDE WITH THE 12 FEET, AND IT DOES MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE IF WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF BIKERS AND WALKERS.

WHEN WE ARE TALKING 119,000 A WEEK, THAT'S A LOT OF PEOPLE WANTING TO WALK AROUND AND EXPLORE THE AREA.

IT IS GOING TO BE EXCITING. YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT THE SEAWALL GETTING THAT UP AND PROTECTING THE SHORELINE.

IT'S A BIG SELLING POINT RIGHT IN THAT AREA TO BE WALKING

AROUND. >> .

>> THERE MR. SEGARS, WOULD YOU LIKE TO ADD ANYTHING?

>> YEAH, I'D LIKE TO -- I AGREE WITH COMMISSIONER SWIFT SWIFT.

I THINK THAT'S A REALLY IMPORTANT IDEA.

DURING THE COVID I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY BIKES AT ALL.

I DO. I LOVE TO MOUNTAIN BIKE.

>> I KNOW THAT THIS IS NOT MOUNTAIN BIKING, BUT BIKING JUST IN GENERAL TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT WOULD BE AWESOME.

IT'S LOT OF FUN. OTHER THAN THAT, I AM VERY EXCITED ABOUT EVERYTHING. IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S COMING

TOGETHER GREAT. >>

>> MR. ENTROP? >> I THINK THAT I THIS IS AN EXCITING PROJECT AND I KNOW THAT EVERYONE HAS BEEN WORKING VERY HARD ON THIS. I KNOW THAT MINAUL, AND THE CITY STAFF HAS, OF WORKED HARD, AND THERE'S A LOT OF NEW INFORMATION AND PARTS AND PIECES OF THIS FRONT OPROJECT.

WITH THAT SAID I WILL DEFER BACK TO RECOMMENDATION OF CITY STAFF AND JUST LIKE THEY HAVE -- WHAT THEY ARE REPRESENTING, I AM HAPPY TO GO ALONG WITH, AND I WILL BE IN FAVOR OF THIS THIS

EVENING. >> THANK YOU.

I DON'T THINK THAT I MISSED ANYBODY I AM THE COURT: SO EXCITED ABOUT THIS PROJECT, AND I REALLY TAKE MY HAT OFF TO THE DEVELOPERS FOR THROWING THE BUDGETS OUT THE DOOR AND REALLY WANTING TO MAKE IT NICE, AND I THINK THAT THESE MAJOR WARRANTS ARE FOR GOOD REASON.

I AGREE WITH THE CITY AND EVERYBODY'S COMMENTS ABOUT TRYING TO KEEP THOSE TRAILS AS WIDE AS WE CAN.

[02:50:05]

. >> I LIKE THE TOWN HOME IDEA, AND YOU ARE TRYING TO MAKE IT AS NICE AS YOU CAN.

SO I WILL BE VOTING IN FAVOR. SO ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. ENGEN AND I DON'T KNOW WHO SECONDED IT.

MR. WINTON? >> YES.

SO WE ARE READY TO TAKE A VOTE. EVERYONE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION.

RAISE YOUR HAND. >> ALL IN FAVOR?

>> AND THAT IS UNANIMOUS, SUSAN DID YOU GET THAT?

THAT IS A UNANIMOUS VOTE. >> I GOT IT, THANK YOU.

>> WE WILL MOVE ON. >> THAT YOU ALL VERY MUCH.

>> THANK YOU EVERYBODY. >> OKAY.

[5E. Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation to City Council on a request by Connie B. Cooper, on behalf of Bayside Land Partners, property owner, regarding the following: 1) Rezone approximately 2.083 acres from Form-Based New Neighborhood (FB-NN) District to Form-Based Urban Neighborhood (FB-UN) District; 2) Approve a Special Use Permit (SUP) for multi-family dwellings on approximately acres on property zoned Form-Based Urban Neighborhood (FB-UN) District; and 3) Approve an amendment to a Framework Plan for townhomes, single-family uses and mixed-use buildings. These tracts, totaling 22.045 acres, are located approximately located at 1950, 2005, 2009 and 2013 Sunset Boulevard, in the City of Rowlett, Dallas County, Texas]

AND 3 APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO A FRAMEWORK PLAN FOR TOWN HOMES SINGLE FAMILY USES AND MIXED USE BUILDINGS.

THESE TRACTS TOTALING 22.045 ACRES, ARE LOCATEDED AT APPROXIMATELY 1950, 2,005, 20 A 09.

AND 2013 UNSEPTEMBER BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF ROWLETT, DALLAS COUNTY TEXAS. AND IS THIS ALEX PRESENTING?

>>. >> WHY HE I WILL BE -- BE MS. ESTEVEZ CAN GO I INTERRUPT A MINUTE, I APOLOGIZE.

>> I WAS WONDERING IF WE CAN BE PROPOSE A 10 MINUTE BREAK.

>> IT'S BEEN 3 HOURS SINCE WE HAVE BEN HERE.

>> WE ABSOLUTELY CAN. >> I WAS TRYING TO GET YOUR

ATTENTION BEFORE YOU STARTED. >> OKAY

>> ALEX PARDON, US WE ARE GOING TO TAKE A QUICK BREAK.

I SHOW 918, WHY DON'T WE RECONVENE AT 9:30; IS THAT OKAY

WITH EVERYONE? >> ARE THE PERFECT.

>> ARE SO WE ARE GOING TO TAKE A FORMAL BREAK, AND WE WILL9:30.

. SO WE ARE OFFICIALLY RECONVENING THIS MEETING, PLANNING ZONING MEETING, AND I BELIEVE MR. COTE YOU WERE ABOUT TO MAKE YOUR PRESENTATION, SIR

>>YES, MA'AM. WE WILL WAIT FOR LAURA TO GET THAT BACK UP, AND

WE WILL GET GOING >> WE ARE ALSO MISSING ROBERT.

MR. SWIFT. MADAM CARE, ROBE EARTH HAS NOTER

[02:55:04]

>> WE STILL HAVE A QUORUM. .

>> WELL, LET'S GIVE HIM 1 MORE MEN.

MAYBE HE CAN RECONNECT. IF NOT, WE WILL TO ON WITHOUT HIM. WE STILL HAVE A QUORUM.

>>. SESS GETTING BACK ON, TRYING TO RECONNECTION. SO GIVE HIM JUST A SECOND.

>> OKAY, GREAT. THERE HE IS SORRY ABOUT THAT

GUYS. >> THAT'S OKAY.

OKAY, MR. KOENIG, YOU ARE ON. >> THIS IS A REQUEST FOR 3 DIFFERENT APPROVE AS THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO FULLY GIVE THE ENTITLEMENTS FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT AS IT'S PROPOSED.

AND SO THEY WERE KIND OF BROKEN TOWN IN THE TITLE THAT WOULD BREAK IT TOWN EVEN FURTHER HERE, AND MAKE IT LITTLE MORE CLEAR.

SO WITH THE FIRST WOULD BE TO REZONE 3 PARCELS THAT WOULD TOTAL APPROXIMATELY 2.083 ACRES. FROM THE FORM-BASED NEW NEIGHBORHOOD DIRECT TO THE FBUNTRICT.

THE SECOND WOULD BE THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT.

>> AN SU, ON MULTIFAMILY DWELLS, ARE ON 1.6 ACRES OF FORM-BASED NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT LAND AND THE FORTH POSH WOULD BE A AMENDMENT TO A FRAMEWORK PLAN THAT WOULD ALLOW FOR TOWN HOMES, FA SINGLE-FAMILY USES AND MIXED PLAN USES. AND WE WILL TRY TO STAY ON MOSTLY AND KEEP THOSE DISCRETELY CATEGORIZED IN THE PRESENTATION HERE. BUT DO TRY TO KEEP THOSE 3 THINGS IN MIND AS WE GO FORWARD. WE WILL ALSO PUT THIS OUT HERE AT THE START AND TO ALSO KEEP IN MIND AS WELL, WE WILL REMIND YOU AS WELL AT THE END OF THIS, WE WILL MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ENTIRE REQUEST BUT ALSO WE WILL MAKE SEPARATE RECOMMENDATIONS ON EACH OF THESE DIFFERENT COMPONENTS OF THIS REQUEST.

THAT WOULD ALSO BE REMIND YOU THAT YOU, AS THE COMMISSION MAY CHOOSE TO RECOMMEND ANY COMBINATION OF 4 OR AGAINST ANY OF THESE REQUESTS ON THERE. WTH THAT.

SO HE WE ARE JUST GOING TO PUT THAT OUT THERE ARE FOR YOU.

TO KEEP IN MINDMENT AS YOU LISTEN TO OUR PRESENTATION AND ALSO AS THE APPLICANT WILL MAKE THEIR PRESENTATION AS WELL.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE, LAURA. >> GETTING UP TO SPEED ON WHERE THE ZONING HISTORY PROCESS HAS BEEN.

BACK IN APRIL OF 2015. THE PROPERTY WAS ZONED IN THE FB, AND THE FORM-BASED NEW NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT AS PART IT ESTABLISHED THE PRIMARY STREET NETWORK, THE CONNECTIVITY.

THE HIKE AND BIKE CORRIDORS THAT ARE TO GO THROUGH THIS AREA.

ANY FLEX SPACE AT GRADE THAT WOULD BEIFIED IDENTIFIED, IN TH PUBLIC SPACE OPEN AREA, IT WOULD BE BE THE ENTIRE BAYSIDE DEVELOPMENT AS EXPOSED AT THAT TIME.

THE SECOND ZONING ACTION WAS ON TEASE OF 2016.

THEY APPROVED A REZONING OF APPROXIMATELY A 20 ACRE TRACT FROM THIS PHORBOL NEW NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT TO THE PHORBOL URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT AS WELL AS A FRAMEWORK PLAN THAT ALLOWED FOR A MORE DENSE SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSING

[03:00:05]

SO THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY WOULD BE THE LARGE HE WERE OF THE- THE LARGEST SECTION OF THIS SUBJECT PROPERTY THAT DOES HAVE THIS EXISTING FRAMEWORK PLAN ESTABLISHED ON THIS PROPERTY SO THAT IS ALSO THE REASON WHY WE ARE SAYING THAT THIS IS AN AMENDMENT TO A FRAMEWORK PLAN BECAUSE IT WOULD BE CHANGING THE ENTITLEMENTS THAT WERE APPROVED BACK IN 2016 FOR THE PREPONDERANCE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES.

>> THE CITY YOU ADOPTED, A CODE REQUIRING AN SUP, SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR MULTIFAMILY UNITS. THE PURPOSE OF THAT WAS TO GRANT THE CITY COUNCIL SOME ADDITIONAL OVERSIGHT OF MULTIFAMILY UNITS TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE COMPONENTS ARE SUPPORTIVE OF THE ANTICIPATED COMMERCIAL USES WITHIN THE PHORBOL AREAS, AND ALSO TO ENCOURAGE AN APPROPRIATE INTEGRATION OF LAND USES.

THE REASON THAT THIS IS RELEVANT.

THIS REQUEST DOES CONTAIN A MIXED USE BUILDING, 52 REST 10 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND THEY ARE CONSIDERED WILL MULTIFAMILY UNITS UNDER THE PHORBOL CODE THERE FOR THE SUP, WOULD BE A REQUIREMENT FOR THAT TO BE APPROVED FOR THE MIXED USE BUILDING TO MOVE FORWARD AS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA. >> AN BIT MORE ABOUT WHERE WE ARE ACTUALLY TALKING ABOUT HERE. THE PROPERTIES IN RED ARE THE SUBJECT PARCELS. THERE ARE ACTUALLY 4 TRACTS THAT MAKE UP THIS ENTIRE PROPERTY. 3 PARCELS THAT WE MIGHT BE REFERRING TO AS THE COMMERCIAL PARCELS.

THOSE ARE THE ONES THAT ARE SORT OF ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE OF THE SCREEN SOUTH OF SUNSET BOULEVARD.

THOSE PROPERTIES ARE ABOUT 2.083 ACRES E AND AGAIN THAT WOULD BE THE PROPERTY REQUIRED TO BE REZONED UNDER THIS PROPOSAL.

AND THEN THE LARGER TRACT WHICH IS JUST SHY OF 20 ACRES, WHICH WE ARE REFERRING TO FOR AN ORGANIZATIONAL PURPOSE STRUCTURE TO THIS PRESENTATION AS THE RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE PORTION, AND THAT WOULD BE THE PROPERTY THAT IS BOUNDED BY THE TOWN HOUSES THAT ARE BEING DEVELOPED ON THE SORT OF THE LEFT HAND SIDE OF THE NORTH AND WEST. AND THEN ALSO WOULD BE BOUNDED TO THE SOUTHEAST BY THE MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT THERE.

>> AND ALSO SUNSET BOULEVARD IS ON THE SOUTH.

WE NOTE THAT THE PROPERTY GENERALLY DOES HAVE AN UPWARD SLOPE FROM SUNSET BOULEVARD UP TO THE RAIL LINE WHICH FORMS THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY U NOT A LOT OF TREES ON THIS PROPERTY IN ITS CURRENT STATE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

>> SITE ACCESS IS PRETTY EASY FOR THIS 1.

SUNSET BOULEVARD ON THE SOUTH SIDE IS THE PRIMARY THOROUGHFARE THAT RUNS- THAT WOULD BE ACCESSING THIS PROPERTY AS WELL AS FOR THE BAYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD. THIS IS A 2 LANE UNDIVIDED THOROUGHFARE WITHIN A 65 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY.

THERE WOULD BE NO ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS THAT WOULD BE MADE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF JOHN STREET PARKING TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY THE DEVELOPERS OF ADJACENT AND BAYSIDE A DRIVE COMES INTO THAT PROPERTY AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER, AND ALSO EXITS IT AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER. THIS WOULD BE A 50 FOOT 2-LANE UNDIVIDE YOU HAD ROADWAY WHICH WOULD GIVE ACCESS TO THE TOWN HOME PROPERTY TO AND ALSO TO THE WEST, AND THE MULTIFAMILY COMMUNITY TO THE EAST. , INTO THE INTERIOR OF THE PROPERTY WITH SUNSET BOULEVARD. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE LAURA.

THIS IS THE PHORBOL URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD FOR THE LARGER MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE PROPERTY, THE 20 ACRES THAT YOU SEE ON THE RIGHT OUTLINED IN THE RED, AND THEN YOU SEE THE SAULER

[03:05:01]

IT DOES HAVE THE FRAMEWORK ON IT THAT WOULD ALLOW FOR A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING PRODUCT FOR A SINGLE HOUSE OF RECORD.

THE NEW URBAN DISTRICT IS TYPICALLY INTENDED FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS.

YOU UNDER THE PROPOSED FRAMEWORK PLAN THIS PROPERTY THAT YOU CAN SEE WE'VE GOT THAT ON THE LEFT OF WHAT THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING WOULD HAVE CASITAS, TOWN HOMES, NEIGHBORHOODS AND RESIDENTIAL USES. 1 OF THE ORGANIZING DESIGN PRINCIPLES OF THIS SITE IS A LARGE GREEN SPACE IN THE CENTER AND THAT WOULD PROVIDE BOTH NOT ONLY THE FOCAL POINT FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD BUT ALSO OPPORTUNITIES FOR NEIGHBORHOOD GATHERINGS FOR RECREATION AND JUST TO BE THE SORT OF 1 OF THOSE DEFINING CHARACTERISTICS OF THIS PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD.

I WOULD ALSO NOTE THAT UNDER THE REQUIREMENTS IN THE PHORBOL CODE FOR THE URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT THERE IS A REQUIREMENT THAT 20 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL UNITS MUST BE A COMBINATION OF MIXED RESIDENTIAL SHOP FRONT AND MIXED USE, AND THEN A SECOND PART TO THAT WOULD BE MOST OF THE TOTAL UNITS CONSTRUCTED MUST BE COMPRISED OF LIVE, WORKING, TOWN HOME, COULD THE AMOUNT, AND

CASITA BUILDING TYPES. >> OF THE KEEP THAT IN MIND AS LAURA MOVES US ONTO THE NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

REASON FOR THAT REQUIREMENT OF CARBOLATEOF VERY QUIRE.

OF THE PHORBOL BASED NEIGHBORHOOD WOULD PROVIDE A RANGE OF NEIGHBORHOOD CHOICES, NEIGHBORHOOD IDENTITIES OF HOW THEY ARE DEFINED, IT WOULD BE THINGS SUCH AS MIXED USE BUILDINGS, LOCATED ON THE PRIMARY STREETS BUT ALSO THAT THESE NONRESIDENTIAL USES ARE WE HAVEN INTO WHAT IS PRIMARILY A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOONEIGHBOR FABRIC.

DOES COMPLY WITH THE TWENTI/80 USAGE UNDER THE URBAN DIRECT.

>> SO IN LOOKING AT COMPATIBILITY OF THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TO WHAT IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED AND PLANNED FOR THE AREA. WE NOTE THAT THE INTENT STATEMENT IN THE FRONT OF THE FORM-BASED CODE ALONG THAT LONG STATEMENT IS TO CREATE NEIGHBORHOODS THAT ARE COMFORTABLE AND ATTRACTIVE PLACES FOR PEOPLE TO MEET, LIVE, CONDUCT BUSINESS, AND ENJOY RECREATION.

SO I WOULD NOTE THAT THIS IS A PRIMARILY SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, BUT ALSO HAVE THESE NEIGHBORHOOD ORIENTED COMMERCIAL USES WHICH WOULD BE IN THE COMMERCIAL AREA TO THE WEST AND ALSO WITHIN THAT MIXED USE BUILDING WITH THE GROUND FLOOR RETAIL SPACE. THIS PROPOSAL WOULD BE PROVIDING A SUITABLE CONNECTION BETWEEN THE ADJOINING MULTIFAMILY AND SINGLE-FAMILY A NEIGHBORHOODS. IT WOULD SERVE AS A PHYSICAL TRANSITION, WITH ITS MASSING AND ITS HEIGHT, GOING FROM THE MULTIFAMILY TO THE PROPOSED TOWN HOMES AND CASITAS, AND SECONDLY WOULD NOTE THAT THE RESTAURANT COMMERCIAL USES WHICH ARE PROPOSED FOR THE LAKEFRONT BE TRACT SOUTH OF SUNSET BOULEVARD WOULD ADD AN ADDITIONAL UNIQUE RETAIL DINING OPPORTUNITIES ALONG LAKE RAY HUBBARD THAT DOESN'T REALLY EXIST SO MUCH HERE IN THE CITY AS OF OF NOW. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA.

>> THIS IS ALSO A CUT THAT SHOWS A BIT MORE OF THE ENTIRE BAYSIDETRICT. THE BAYSIDE DISTRICT ITSELF DOES EXTEND EAST OVER TO DALROCK ROAD.

THAT IS MORE OF AN INTENSE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.

WOULD NOTE THAT THERE'S AN EXTENDED STAY HOTEL AND SHOP FOR COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS WHICH ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION CURRENTLY THAT ARE BETWEEN THE EXISTING MULTIFAMILY APARTMENT COMPLEXES

[03:10:04]

WHAT WE ARE HOPING TO SEE THERE ARE SOME VERTICALLY INTEGRATED MIXED USE BUILDINGS THAT WOULD HAVE RESIDENTIAL USES ON THE UPPER FLOORS, AND COMMERCIAL USES ON THE GROUND LEVEL FLOORS.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. >>.

>> WHEN WE DO A ZONING CHANGE, WE ALSO LOOK AT THE FUTURE LAND USE MA'AM OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO SEE WHAT THE FUTURE LAND USE IS PROJECTED TO BE FOR THIS SITE.

THE FEATURE LAND USE PLAN DOES DESIGNATE THIS ENTIRE AREA IN THE BAYSIDE DISTRICT TO BE THE MIXED USE IN CHARACTER.

SO THAT WOULD HAVE A VARIETY OF USES.

MIXED RESIDENTIAL USES, TOWN HOMES.

DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY UNITS AND RETAIL USES WOULD BE AMONG THEM.

THE THERE FOR THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DOES CONFORM TO THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN FOUND IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS WELL AS COMPLEMENTS THE BAY SIDE DISTRICT.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA. >> WE WILL DIDN'T HAVE YOU A TOUR OF WHAT THE FRAMEWORK PLAN IS B IT IS A PLANNING TOOL THAT IS IN THE FORM-BASED CODE WHICH IS USED TO SET FORTH THE VISION OF A PARTICULAR FORM-BASED DISTRICT AND PART OF THAT IS TO LAYOUT WHAT THE GENERAL STREET CONNECTIVITY WILL BE.

THE OPEN SPACES THAT ARE BEING RESERVED FOR WOULD SHOW HOW ANY OPEN SPACES FOR PEOPLE WOULD BE WALKING AROUND IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. SPECIFIC DESIGN STANDARDS TO THIS PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT AND THEN ALSO THE KEY FEATURES THAT REALLY DO SET THIS DEVELOPMENT APART.

SO ON THE RIGHTHAND SIDE THIS IS A SNIPPET OF THE FRAMEWORK PLAN.

WITH THAT YOU WILL SEE THE BOUNDARIES ON THERE.

THE GREEN IS MOST LOGICALLY THE OPEN SPACE.

PROPOSED TRAIL CONNECTIONS ARE SHOWN WITH THOSE ARROWS, AND THEN YOU SEE THE BLUE LINE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SUNSET BOULEVARD WHICH IS THE EXISTING REGIONAL HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL WHICH ALREADY IT GOES AROUND IN THERE TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE CONNECTIVITY.

OF THE. >> NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, BE LAURA.

>> SO WITHIN THIS SPECIFIC MIXED USE OF BUILDING TYPES THERE ARE 58 CASITA, SINGLE-FAMILY 0-LOT LINE UNITS THAT ARE PROPOSED.

THOSE ARE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES, SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED HOMES SPECIFICALLY. WE WILL TALK ABOUT THAT A BIT MORE LATER. 123 TOWNHOME UNITS.

>> TOWNHOMES ARE ALSO CONSIDERED TO BE SINGLE-FAMILY TYPE DEVELOPMENT, AND THE CODE HAS 2 DIFFERENT TYPES OF TOWNHOMES, THIS IS PROPOSED TO BE TOWNHOME 1, AND THEN ADDITIONALLY 52 CONDOMINIUM UNITS THAT WOULD BE WITHIN A MIXED USE BUILDING, AND THOSE ARE THE RESIDENTIAL COMPONENTS OF THIS, TOTALING OF THAT UP. WE HAVE 233 RESIDENTIAL UNITS WHICH WOULD BE PROPOSED FOR THIS SITE.

AGAIN, THOSE ARE ON THAT PROXIMATELY 19.682, I BELIEVE IS WHAT THE NUMBER COMES DOWN TO, APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF PROPERTY OVER ON THE LARGE MANIER PARCEL.

THERE WOULD ALSO BE IN THAT MIXED USE BUILDING BETWEEN 4 TO 6,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE ON THE GROUND FLOOR, THE STREET LEVEL OF THAT MIXED USE BUILDING AND THEN THE PROPERTY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SUNSET BOULEVARD WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 9 TO 15,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL AND RESTAURANT USES

WHICH AGAIN WOULD BE OR YETTED >> MORE ABOUT THE GREEN SPACE WHICH IS PROPOSED FOR THE CENTER PART OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

AGAIN IT WOULD STATE THAT THIS IS A LOCATION FOR COMMUNITY-WIDE GATHERINGS AND EVENTS. PERHAPS YOU WOULD ALSO HAVE BOTH STRUCTURED AND INFORMAL PLAY AREAS AS WELL AS MORE STRUCTURED

[03:15:01]

VIA PEDESTRIAN CORRIDORS, THAT WILL ALLOW FOR PEDESTRIANS TO CONNECT THROUGH THIS CENTRAL GREEN WITHOUT HAVING TO USE SO MUCH OF THE 2 STREET NETWORK. ALTHOUGH I WOULD NOTE THAT THE STREET NETWORK WILL HAVE SIDEWALKS WITH THAT AND WE WILL TALK MORE ABOUT THAT IN A BIT AS WELL.

>> IT WOULD BE MAINTAINED HOA, SPACE.

IT WOULD BE 1 OF THE REQUESTED VARIATION'S BY THE APPLICANT TO THIS, GO TO THE ARE FORM-BASED CODE.

THEY ARE REQUESTING TO REDUCE THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT FROM 10 PERCENT TO 9 PERCENT AS WELL AS FOR ALLOWING THE PRIVATE MAINTENANCE. THE CODE DOES REQUIRE 14 PERCENT, I BELIEVE IT IS, I THINK THAT WE HAVE A TYPO IN OF OPEN SPACE, HOWEVER THAT MAY BE REDUCED VIA MINOR WARRANT ADMINISTRATIVELY TO 10 PERCENT. WE, AS THE STAFF DO BELIEVE THAT THE EXISTING OPEN SPACE WITHIN THE WALKING AREA OF THE NEARBY WALKING AREA TO THE PROPERTY DOES WARRANT THAT REDUCTION.

SO THIS FORE, THE REQUEST THAT WOULD BE YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO MAKE THAT RECOMMENDATION ON WOULD BE THAT ADDITIONAL REDUCTION TO BRING THAT NUMBER FROM 10 PERCENT DOWN TO 9

PERCENT. >> STAFF DOES ALSO BELIEVE THAT THIS CENTRAL GREEN IS A VERY UNIQUE FEATURE FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS WELL AS IT DOES MEET THE INTENT OF THE ARE FORM-BASED CODE TO PROVIDE A GOOD AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE, WHICH IS USEABLE AND ACCESSIBLE TO THE RESIDENTS OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

>> NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. >> >> INTEREST'S ALSO A NUMBER OF BUILDING TYPE VERIATIONS THAT ARE REQUESTED.

I WOULD NOTE THAT THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO HAVE WHAT IS CONSIDERED TO BE A MEDIUM DENSITY I SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING PRIMARILY ON THIS SITE, AND THAT WOULD BE THE TOWN HOMES AND THE CASITAS. THESE UNITS WOULD BE REAR-LOADED OFF OF A EALLEYS, THEY WOULD HAE GARAGES IN THE REAR HE HAVE THE PROPERTIES AND ALSO PROVIDE FOR SOME OPPORTUNITY FOR PARALLEL PARKATION LONG THE RESIDENTIAL STREETS.

>> NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, LAURA >> HERE WE LIST OUT SPECIFICALLY THOSE VARIATIONS THAT ARE REQUESTED.

I WILL GO THROUGH THESE, AND WITH THE FIRST WOULD BE TO INCREASE THE DWELLING SIZE OF THE CASITAS TO 2,400 SQUARE FEET. THE CURRENT STANDARD IS A MINIMUM OF 1850 SQUARE FEET AND THE AND TO DECREASE THE SIDEBAR SETBACKS FOR THE CASITA LOT LINE, 7 FOOT ON THE OTHER SIDE, TO WOULD BE A 1 FOOT, AND A 4-FOOT SPLIT.

THE THIRD WOULD BE TO REVISE THE BUILD-TO FROM THE REQUIRED 5 FOOT TO 10 FEET. TO 5 TO 15 FEET, AND I WILL SPEAK A BIT TO THAT ON THE BUILD-TO ZONE FOR THOSE THAT ARE NOT OVERLY FAMILIAR WITH THE WAY THAT THE CODE WORKS.

INSTEAD OF SETBACKS, THAT ARE IN THE ROWLETT CODE AND TYPICAL OF MOST ZONING CODES WHICH REQUIRE A MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM THE STREET A BUILD-TO ZONE IS SIMILAR TO THAT HOWEVER, IT FOCUSES MORE ON MAKING SURE THAT THE HOUSE DOES NOT GET TOO FAR AWAY, OR THE BUILD DOES NOT GET TOO FAR AWAY BECAUSE IT REQUIRES THAT IT WILL BE SOMEWHERE BETWEEN, AS THE REQUEST HERE WOULD BE THAT THE HOMES WILL BE BETWEEN 5 TO 15 FEET.

WHERE UNDER A TYPICAL ZONING THAT SETBACK JUST NEEDS TO BE AT LEAST THAT AMOUNT, AND SO THIS AGAIN REQUIRES BUILDINGS TO HAVE MORE OF A PRESENCE ON THE STREET THAN UNDER A TYPICAL ZONING

ORDINANCE >> NUMBER 4, WOULD REDUCE THE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH OF THE TOWN HOME PRODUCT FROM 25 TO 32 FEET.

ALSO WITH THE TOWNHOME PRODUCT WITH THOSE LOTS SPECIFIC TO THE ADJACENT TO THE RAILROAD, THE LOT DEPTH WOULD BE FROM 90 FEET TO 73 FEET, AND THEN LASTLY, WE DO CREASE THE MINIMUM SIDE YARDS

[03:20:03]

THE APPLICANT WILL BE SPEAKING MORE ON THESE IN THEIR PRESENTATION AS WELL. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

>> ANOTHER VARIATION THAT YOU THE HAM CAN'T IS REQUESTING, THEY ARE REQUESTING 5 FOOT WIDE SIDEWALKS ALONG THE PRESIDENTIAL STREETS IN THIS DEVELOPMENT. THE FORM-BASED CODE DOES REQUIRE A MINIMUM WIDTH OF ALL SIDEWALKS TO BE 6 FEET.

THIS REQUEST WOULD BE ONLINE WITH WHAT HAS BEEN DONE IN THE ADJACENT SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOP E IN BAYSIDE.

THEY ARE CONSTRUCTED WITH A 5 FOOT SIDEWALK ALONG THAT RESIDENTIAL STREET NETWORK. YOU CAN ALSO SEE THERE IN THE DIAGRAM HOW GENERALLY IT LAYS OUT THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE SIDEWALK TO THE HOME, ALSO TO THE STREET IN THERE, SO THERE'S ALSO THAT'S MENITY ZONE WHICH IS REQUIRED WHICH WOULD ALSO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SEPARATION BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND THE

STREET. >> NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE, LAURA.

>> WE ARE GOING TO TRANSITION OURSELVES NOW TO TALKING SPECIFICALLY ABOUT THAT MIXED USE BUILDING ON THERE.

SO ON THIS DIAGRAM THERE ON THE RIGHTHAND SIDE THAT WOULD BE LOCATED IN THAT PINK RECTANGLE ON THE LOWER RIGHTHAND SIDE OF THEIR DEVELOPMENT, THE SOUTHEASTERN PART OF THEIR DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS BROUGHT IN AS BOTH A TRANSITION PHYSICALLY AS WELL AS IN A USE-WISE, TO PROVIDE SOME CONNECTION BETWEEN THE

>> CAN YOU ALL HEAR ALEX? >> NO, I THOUGHT IT WAS ME

AGAIN. >> ALEX, WE CAN'T HEAR YOU.

>> HE CAN'T HEAR OR SEE US APPARENTLY.

>> LET'S SEE IF I CAN CHAT WITH HIM.

>>. ALEX, IS GOING TO SIGN OUT, AND

SIGN BACK IN >> IT'S PROBABLY OUR ZOOM ISSUE.

THAT WE ARE GOING TOO LONG. >> THE COMPARED TO THE LAST COUPLE ONCE. WE ARE JUST ABOUT ON PACE.

>> NOT A PACE THAT I WANT TO SET.

>> IF YOU GO TO THE ROWLETT WEBSITE, AND LOOK AT THE

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. >> IT IS 1 TO 2 DAYS PER MONTH FOR ABOUT AN HOUR. I THINK THAT IT'S SOMETHING SIMILAR TO THAT. WE MIGHT WANT TO WORK ON THAT.

>> IT USED TO BE. YOU THINK THAT A LOT OF THOSE CITY HALL MEETINGS GO TO 11 OR MIDNIGHT.

>> I WAS WATCHING SOME OF THE MINUTES REGARDING THE WHOLE BAYSIDE MINUTES. THEY WERE 5 HOUR STRONG IN THAT 1, LIKE THE JANUARY 5, 2020, MEETING OUT THERE.

>> IT'S REALLY COMMON FOR THEM TO GO LONG, I THINK THAT WE'VE

BEEN LUCKY FOR A LONG TIME. >> I AM BACK NOW.

>> WE CAN HEAR YOU. MY COMPUTER SOMETIMES WHEN IN ZOOM JUST DECIDES TO TURN OFF MY SOUND AND SO THAT'S WHAT

HAPPENED THERE. >> WELL, PRESS ON THERE, WE CAN

HEAR YOU. >> SO THIS IS THE MIXED USE BUILDING WOULD BE A 5-STORY BUILDING AS PROPOSED WITH COMMERCIAL USE US AT THE STREET LEVEL OF APPROXIMATELY 100 SPACES WHICH WOULD BE SITUATED UNDER BEHIND THE BUILDING.

THE COMMERCIAL USES BOB ORIENTED TOWARD THE LOCAL NEIGHBORHOOD.

WITH THAT, THIS ALSO WOULD PROVIDE A RESIDENTIAL OPTION WHICH CURRENTLY IS NOT FOUND IN BAYSIDE.

THESE WOULD BE CONDOMINIUM UNITS FOR INDIVIDUAL OWNERSHIP.

[03:25:01]

AND ALSO WE FEEL THAT IT DOES COMPLETE THE TRANSITION FROM THE SCENT INCIARTE TOSINGLE-FAMILY AREASSINGLE-FAMILYTOWNHOME AREAH THE BAYSIDE DEVELOPMENT THAT CONTINUES TO THE NORTH AND WEST TO THAT EXISTING MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. >> AGAIN, I WOULD NOTE THAT THE SUP, IS A NEW REQUIREMENT FOR MULTIFAMILY UNITS.

THE CONSPIRACYIUMS ARE CONSIDERED MULTIFAMILY OR AS THE FORM-BASED CODE DESCRIBES THEM AS MIXED RESIDENTIAL, AS THEY -- AS A TYPE. SO THEREFORE, THE SUP, IS REQUIRED UNDER ORDINANCE 026-20 FOR ALL MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITHIN THE FORM-BASED URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT.

THE PROPOSAL WOULD HAVE UP TO 52 CONDOMINIUM UNITS WHICH WOULD BE LOCATED ON THE UPPER FLOORS OF THIS MIXED USE BUILDING.

THE PROPOSED UNIT MIX IS 4 STUDIO UNITS.

141-BEDROOM UNITS. 282-BEDROOM UNITS, AND 6-3 BEDROOM UNITS. TO NOTE THAT STREET LEVEL OF THE BUILDING THAT WOULD FRONT ONTO SUNSET BOULEVARD WOULD HAVE BETWEEN 4 AND 6,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE MANY WHICH WOULD BE AGAIN BE TEARING THEED FOR MORE THE NEEDS OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE SUNSET PLLANDI AND OTHER COMPONENTS OF THE BAY SIDE DISTRICT. NEXT SLIDE HERE.

THIS HERE IS A SLIDE THAT DOES GIVE A RENDERING OF THE PROPOSED

ELEVATION >> OF COURSE THESE THINGS ARE IN A SOMEWHAT EARLY STAGE SO WE WOULD PUT THAT OUT THERE FOR CONSIDERATION. ALSO IT GIVES A BIT OF AN UNDERSTANDING OF HOW THE BUILDING WOULD BE PROPOSED TO FUNCTION AS WELL, THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WILL BE MUCH BETTER EXPLAINED BY THE APPLICANT, AND THEN WITH THEIR TEAM AS WELL, HOW IT WOULD WORK, BUT YOU CAN SORT OF SEE THAT THERE IS THE GROUND LEVEL RETAIL.

THE STREET LEVEL RETAIL, AND THEN THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS ABOVE WITH PARKING TUCKED UNDERNEATH TAKING ADVANTAGE AND THIS SITE DOES TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE SITE TOPOGRAPHY WHICH DOES SLOPE UP FROM SUNSET BOULEVARD TO THE NORTH.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. >> THIS ALSO DIAGRAM DOES LAY OUT ON THE RIGHTHAND SIDE SHOWS THE PARKIN CONFIGURATION TO SOME EXTENT. THERE IS A BUILDING THAT'S TOP OF THIS. BUT THIS DOES PEEL AWAY THAT BUILDING. YOU CAN ALSO WILL SEE THOSE 2 RECTANGLES WHICH ARE SORT OF THE TAUPE GRAY.

THOSE WOULD BE WHERE THE RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES WOULD BE IN THE BUILDING. SO SPECIFICALLY THERE WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 100 SPACES WHICH WOULD BE BEHIND THE RETAIL ON THE GROUND LEVEL OF THE SPACE. 16 OF THOSE SPACES ARE REQUIRED PER THE STANDARD AND THE FORM-BASED CODE WHICH DOES HAVE 1 SPACE FOR EVERY 300 SQUARE FEET OF MERL SPACE.

WHAT THEY ARE USING RIGHT NOW IS ABOUT 4,000 THINE HUNDRED SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE. THERE WOULD ALSO BE 73 SPACES REQUIRED FOR THE PROPOSED UNIT MIX OF THE CONDOMINIUMS. SO THEREFORE, AS OF OF NOW, THEY DO HAVE SOME EXTRA PARKING SPACE OVER AND ABOVE WHAT IS REQUIRED BY THE FORM-BASED CODE FOR OFFSTREET PARKING ON THIS PROPERTY.

>> IT IS DEFINED IN THE FORM-BASED CODE WHICH PERMITS A USE WHICH IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH A SPECIFIC PROVISION OR NUMBER OF PROVISIONS OR THE INTENT OF THE FORM-BASED CODE.

IT IS REQUIRED FOR MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS IN ALL OF THE SUBDISTRICTS OR THE DISTRICTS OF THE FORM-BASED CODE WHERE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS ARE THE TERM WE USED IN THERE IS ALLOWED, BUT AT LEAST I GUESS AUTHORIZED WITH THE APPROVAL OF AN SUP. THE ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS OF THIS

[03:30:05]

COMMUNITY. >> NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

>> ONCE AGAIN, THE FORM-BASED CODE IS INTENDED TO CREATE MIXED USE NEIGHBORHOODS WHICH DO HAVE MULTIFAMILY UNITS WHICH ARE INTEGRATED WITH AND IN SUPPORT OF THE SURROUNDING COMMERCIAL USE US AND THE INTENT IS FOR TO AVOID THE CONSTRUCTION OF STAND ALONE MULTIFAMILY APARTMENT COME FLINGS.

THE APPROVAL CRITERIA WE ARE GOING TO BRING FORWARD IN THE NEXT FEW SLIDES FOR SPECIAL USE PERMITS IS FOUND IN THE ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE. THIS IS ALSO SOMETHING THAT WAS PUT FORWARD IN THE ORDINANCE THAT REQUIRED THE SUP.

THAT THOSE STANDARDS WOULD ALSO BE USED WHEN EVALUATING SUP'S, IN THE- FOR MULTIFAMILY USES WITHIN THE FORM-BASED CODE AREAS. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE LAURA.

>> SO FIRST OFF, WHETHER OR NOT THE PROPOSED SUP, IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BE AND OUR INFRASTRUCTURE PLANS, WITH THE FORM-BASED CODE WITHIN THE FEDERAL REGULATIONS, THE SUP, IS SPECIFICALLY FOR 52 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS WHICH WOULD BE SITUATED ON THE UPPER FLOORS OF A MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING.

IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MIXED USE DESIGNATION FOR THE AREA, AS WELL AS BUILDING TYPES INTENDED FOR THE ARE FORM-BASED MANY NEIGHBORHOOD WITH MULTIFAMILY USES SUPPORTIVE OF COMMERCIAL USES TO THE DOMINANT SINGLE-FAMILY CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. >> SECOND, THAT THE PROPOSE THE SUP, IS CONSISTENT WITH THE MIXED USE DISTRICT.

THIS URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT IS INTENDED TO HAVE MIXED USES WITH THE PRIMARY FOCUS ON ESTABLISHING A STRONG RESIDENTIAL FABRIC. ALLOWING THE BUILDING TIMES AND USES WITHIN THE DISTRICT ARE TO CREATE APPROPRIATELY SCALED PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY NEIGHBORHOODS.

THIS REQUESTED SUP, FOR THESE MIXED -- I'M SORRY, MULTIFAMILY UNITS WITHIN THE MIXED USE BUILDING TO ALIGN WITH THE FORM-BASED CODE AS WELL AS STRIKING A BALANCE BETWEEN THE PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL USE WHILE PROVIDING AANCE LARRY SUPPORTIVE RETAIL ON THE GROUND FLOOR OF THAT MIXED USE BUILDING.

>> NEXT SLIDE PLEASE LAURA. >> THE THIRD WEATHER THE SUP, MEETS THE CHALLENGE OF SOME CHANGING TREND CONDITION OR FACT. THIS IS IN RESPONSE TO AN OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL OPTION HE PROVIDE TAG BRIDGE BETWEEN THE MULTIFAMILY SINGLE-FAMILYTOWNHOME UNITS. THESE MULTIFAMILY UNITS LOCATED WITHIN THE MIXED USE BUILDING DO ADDRESS A COUPLE OF INTENTS, TO MEET THAT 20 PERCENT, TO 80 PERCENT RATIO, TO BOMB OATH INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT. THIS PARTICULAR TYPE OF CONDOMINIUM UNIT FOR OWNERSHIP IS A DIFFERENT TYPE OF HOUSING TYPE THAN FOUND WITHIN THE BAYSIDE DISTRICT.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE LAURA. >> FOURTH, WEATHER THE PROPOSED SUP, WOULD ENHANCE HEALTH, SAFETY WELFARE OF THE PUBLIC.

WE DON'T BELIEVE THAT THIS WOULD COMPROMISE GENERAL WELFARE.

AND WHETHER THE MUNICIPALITY AND ABLE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT L BE- TRANSPORTATION, AND UTILITY SERVICES WHILE MAINTAINING SUFFICIENT LEVELS OF SERVICE TO THE EXISTING DEVELOPENT.

ADEQUATE UTILITIES, DRAINAGE FACILITIES WOULD BE ESTABLISHED FOR THIS COMPONENT. THIS MIXED USE COMPONENT IN THESE MULTIFAMILY UNITS. SHOULD THIS REZONING AND FRAMEWORK PLAN BE APPROVED. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

>> WEATHER THE PROPOSED SUP, IS CONSISTENT WITH, OR WILL HAVE SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE PROPERTY WITHIN THE VICINITY. THIS WOULD ESTABLISH COMPATIBLE USE WITH THE MULTIFAMILY COMPLEX DOES THE SOUTHEAST, AS WELL AS THE TRANSITION TO THE PROPOSED TOWN HOMES.

IT DOES PROVIDE BOTH A PHYSICAL MASSING SIMILARITY TO THE

[03:35:04]

PROPERTIES. >> NEXT SLIDE PLEASE LAURA.

>> THE SUITABILITY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR THE EXISTING ZONING AND THE PROPOSED USE OF THE SUP, THIS DOES ALIGN WITH THE INTENT OF THE URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT.

IT DOES ESTABLISH CONDOMINIUM UNITS WITH SUPPORTIVE COMMERCIAL FUNCTION TO THE GROUND FLOOR. IT IS SUITABLE FOR THE URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT BECAUSE INTENT OF THATTRICT IS TO CREATE A RESIDENTIAL FABRIC THAT ALSO HAS MIXED USE COMMERCIAL COMPONENTS INTEGRATED WITHIN THAT.

IN THIS CASE IN PARTICULAR THERE WOULD BE 100,000 SQUARE FEET OF RESIDENTIAL SPACE WITHIN THESE MULTIFAMILY CONDOMINIUM UNITS AND THEN APPROXIMATELY 4,000 TO 6,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE. NEXT SLIDE PLEA.

STAFF DOES RECOMMEND HE'S PROVAL OF THE SUP, COMPONENT OF THE OVERSAUL REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR THE 52 CONDOMINIUM UNITS AS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED FRAMEWORK PLAN.

WE AGAIN WOULD STATE THAT THIS WOULD PROVIDE A UNIQUE RESIDENTIAL OPTION WITHIN THE BAYSIDE DISTRICT AS WELL AS TO REALIZE THE INAT THE TIME OF THE CODE TO FACILITATE THE CREATION OF PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED NEIGHBORHOODS WITH APPROPRIATE AND INTEGRATED COMMERCIAL COMPONENTS WHICH DO PROVIDE SOME OF THE DAILY NEEDS OF THE RESIDENTS WITHOUT HAVING TO GET IN THEIR VEHICLES AND LEAVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

ALSO I WOULD ALSO STATE THAT THE MIXED USE BUILDING HELPS TO BUILD A MORE UNIQUE URBANISM WHERE DAILY NEEDS OF RESIDENTS ARE MORE CONVENIENTLY LOCATED AS WELL AS PROVIDING SERVICES AND AMENITIES, SUCH AS RESTAURANTS, CANBU TEEN RETAIL WITHIN WALKING DISTANCE OF THE HOMES THAT WOULD BE DEVELOPED WITH THIS PROJECT SHOULD IT APPROVED AND ALSO THE EXISTING RESIDENCE IN BAYSIDE.

GOING BACK TO THE ZONING CHANGE RECOMMENDATION.

THE STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE CHANGE IN ZONE FOR THOSE 3 PARCELS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SUNSET BOULEVARD.

FROM THE NEW NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT TO THE URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT AND ALSO TO INCORPORATE THIS AREA WITHIN THE OVERALL FRAMEWORK PLAN. THE APPLICANTEN VISIONS THESE PARCELS TO BE DEVELOPED WITH RESTAURANT COMMERCIAL USES, WHICH WOULD ADD VALUE TO THE PROJECT.

ALSO WOULD BE A UNIQUE OFFERING WITHIN THE BAYSIDE DISTRICT.

THEY PLAN TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THEIR SPECIFIC LOCATION ALONG THE LAKE WITH OUTDOOR AMENITIES AND ATTRACTIONS WHICH WOULD INCLUDE A POTENTIAL BOAT DOCK, POOL AND DINING WITH VIEWS OF

THE LAKE. >> NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, AND THEN LASTLY, STAFF DOES ALSO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE OVERALL FRAMEWORK PLAN AMENDMENT SO THAT WOULD ALLOW THE MIX OF BUILDING TYPES AS PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT.

WE DO BELIEVE THAT THIS WILL CONTRIBUTE TO THE OVERALL MIX OF NEIGHBORHOODS WHICH ARE FOUND WITHIN THE BAYSIDE DISTRICT THAT THE LOCATION ON LAKE RAY HUBBARD AS WELL AS ITS NEARBY ACCESS TO INTERSTATE 30 AND THE TURNPIKE, THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS, THE PROPOSED AND ONGOING DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA DOES HAD CONTRIBUTE TO WHAT MAKES SUNSET LANDING AN ATTRACTIVE, INVITING COMPONENT OF THE FUTURE OF THE CITY.

SO THE LOTS PLANNED FOR THE RESTAURANT SUPPORTING COMMERCIAL USES AGAIN WOULD OFFER THOSE UNIQUE LAKEFRONT DINING EXPERIENCES THE SINGLE STORY AND CONDOMINIUM HOMES FOR OWNER OCCUPANCY, PROVIDE ADDITIONAL AND EXPANDED HOUSING CHOICES AND ALSO WOULD NOTE THAT THE NEIGHBORHOOD ORIENTED COMMERCIAL USES ON THE STREET LEVEL OF THAT MIXED USE BUILDING WILL AGAIN PROVIDE SOME ADDITIONAL -- I SHOULDN'T SAY ADDITIONAL.

WOULD PROVIDE COMMERCIAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE RESIDENTS OF SUNSET LANDING AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENTS.

>> THE LAST, TO WRAP UP THIS PART AS WELL.

THE SUNSET LANDING WOULD BE ANTICIPATED TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN A SINGLE PHASE. THE APPLICANT IS INTENDING TO START THE SINGLE-FAMILY PART OF IT FIRST FOLLOWED VERY CLOSELY BY MULTISTORY MIXED USE BUILD AND THE COMMERCIAL RESTAURANT

[03:40:01]

HE ETHINGS GOING WELL, CONSTRUCTION WOULD PLAN TO BE UNDERWAY BY FALL OF NEXT YEAR, AND THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD WOULD BE BETWEEN AND 4 YEARS. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

>> A NOTE ON THE PUBLIC NOTIFICATION, NOTICES WERE SENT OUT ON JANUARY 25TH OF THIS YEAR.

THERE WERE 19 NOTICES SENT OUT TO THE PROPERTIES WITHIN 200 FEET AND 500 WERE SENT -- I AM SORRY 50 WERE SENT OUT TO THE 500 FOOT COURTESY NOTICE AREA. WITHIN THE 200 AREA WE'VE GOT 0 RESPONSES IN OPPOSITION, AND 0 IN FAVOR, AND WITHIN THE 500 FOOT NOTICE THERE WERE 2 RECEIVED IN OPPOSITION, 0 IN FAVOR. I WOULD ALSO STATE THAT IN THE PACKET THAT YOU MAY HAVE SEEN 1 OR MORE OF THOSE NOTICES THAT DISCUSSED THE COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE ON THIS PROPERTY THAT MIGHT HAVE STATED THAT THE PARTICULAR, THE CONDOMINIUM UNITS WOULD BE IN VIOLATION OF THOSE COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS, THOSE ARE PRIVATE MATTERS THAT ARE 2 OF EARNED -- THAT GOVERN THIS AND THE CITY DOES NOT HAVE ANY INVOLVEMENT IN ENFORCING THOSE COVENANTS I AM GOING TO PUT THAT OUT THERE.

AND ALSO THE APPLICANT WILL ADDRESS THAT ALSO IN THEIR

PRESENTATION. >> AS WELL.

>> NEXT SLIDE PLEASE >> SO OVERALL, AGAIN, TO RESTATE, THE STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ALL 3 OF THE INDIVIDUAL COMPONENTS OF THIS REQUEST.

FIRST OF ALL, TO REZONE THOSE 3 PARCELS TO THE FORM-BASED NEIGHBORHOOD. FROM THE URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE NEW NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT. SECONDLY TO APPROVE THE SUP, THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE 52 MULTIFAMILY DWELLINGS WITHIN THE PROPOSED MIXED USE BUILDING AND LASTLY THE APPROVE ALL OF THE FRAMEWORK PLAN TO ALLOW THE MIX OF BUILDING TYPES AND COMPONENTS AS THE APPLICANT HAS LAID OUT. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

AND FINALLY WE'VE MADE IT TO THE END, AND THE -- I WILL ENTERTAIN QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY OF ME. OR WE CAN MOVE ON TO THE APPL APPLICANT'S PRESENTATION.

>> COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS? MR. COTE?

>> I HAVE A QUESTION CONCERNING -- CAN WE GO BACK NOT TO YOUR LAST SLIDE WHICH IS A QUESTION MARK.

BUT THE 1 RIGHT BEFORE THAT. >> SURE.

CAN. >> I I CAN APPRECIATE ITEMS 2 AND 3 WITH NOT TOO MUCH OF A PROBLEM. ITEM NUMBER 1 THOUGH, WHERE YOU ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL, DID YOU NOT TELL US THAT THERE WERE SOME EXCEPTIONS TO THE FORM-BASED CODE THAT THE APPLICANT WAS ASKING FOR IN ADDITION TO THE CHANGE?

>> YES. >> WHERE ARE THOSE SUMMED UP AT?

>> THOSE VARIATION'S WILL BE COVERED IN THE FRAMEWORK PLAN.

>> HE' HAD WILL OKAY, IF I WAS THINKING OF APPROVING THIS.

I WOULD NOT WANT TO APPROVE NUMBER 3, IF I HAD RESERVATIONS

OF CHANGING THE SIZE OF CASITAS? >> YES.

>>. IF YOU WERE TO MAKE A MOTION, THAT WOULD BE THE TIME TO ADD SOME SPECIAL CONDITIONS.

>> RIGHT. OKAY.

THANK YOU. >> CERTAINLY.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF?

>> MR. ENGEN? >> OF THE ONLY CONCERN THAT I HAVE IS WITH REGARDS TO THE PROPERTY ALONG THE LAKE FOR MIXED USE. DEBATING BACK AND FORTH IT'S NICE THAT YOU DO HAVE THE MULTIUSE BUILDING GOING UP.

WE DO HAVE A LACK OF RESTAURANTS AND RETAIL BUSINESSES OVER IN THAT AREA, AND THAT WILL COME IN AND REALLY HELP ACOME OH AT A TIME ALL OF THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE THERE.

BUT I WALK THAT AREA, AND IT'S NICE TO HAVE THE BEAUTY OF THE LAKE, AND I'D HATE TO SEE IT- BUILDINGS GOING UP OVER IT AS PEOPLE ARE WALKING THE SIDEWALK YOU ARE NOT SEEING THE LAKE, AND

[03:45:02]

JUST A THOUGHT ABOUT THAT. >> I JUST THOUGHT MAYBE IT'S BEST TO KEEP THAT PROPERTY OPEN, AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE CITY OF DALLAS, IF YOU HAVE TO GO I'M CERTAIN AMOUNT OF FEET THAT'S OWNED BY THE CITY OF DALLAS ALONG THE LAKE.

>> SURE. >> SOME OF THOSE THINGS ARE ALREADY ADDRESSED IN THE FORM-BASED CODE.

I WOULD ALSO STATE THAT THE CURRENT ZONING IS FOR THOSE TO BE DEVELOPED AS SINGLE-FAMILY STATE ESTATE HOMES, THINGS LIKE THAT. AND ALSO THE CITY OF DALLAS DOES HAVE PRETTY WELL ESTABLISHED WHAT THEIR TAKE AREA WOULD BE AND WHAT THINGS COULD HAPPEN WITHIN THAT TAKE AREA AS WELL.

>> I JUST LIKE THE OPENNESS, IF YOU ARE WALKING THAT PATH OR RIDING, IT'S JUST NICE TO HAVE AN OPEN VIEW TO THE LAKE ALL THE

TIME. >> I THINK THAT COULD BEING IS THAT THE APPLICANT COULD DISCUSS A LITTLE BIT MORE, AS WELL AS IF OUR URBAN DESIGNER HAS ANYTHING THAT HE WOULD HAVE BE ABLE TO CONTRIBUTE IN THE WAY OF EITHER ANTICIPATED OR REQUIRED IN THE WAY OF VIEW CORRIDORS THAT COULD BE ESTABLISHED TO THE LAKE THAT THE APPLICANT WOULD BE EITHER AMENABLE TO, AGREEING TO AAGREE TO, OR WOULD BE REQUIRED TO HAVE.

>> IF THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT AND YOU WOULD LIKE TO COME FORWARD AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, AND

PRESENT ON THIS ITEM. >> YES, MADAM CHAIR.

CAN YOU HEAR ME? >> I CAN..

>> YES? >> YES, MA'AM, WE CAN HEAR YOU I AM WORKING ON A MICROPHONE AND A COMPUTER MICROPHONE, SO I AM GOING TO CUT DOWN JUST WAVE AT ME IF MY PRESENTATION IS TOO LOUD. CAN YOU HEAR ME OKAY?

>> NO. YOUR FINE.

AND COULD YOU STATE YOUR NAME AND APRIL ADDRESS FOR THE

RECORD, PLEASE >>YES, CONNIE COOPER.

I RESIDE AT 3839 MCKINNEY AVENUE DALLAS TEXAS, 75204.

>> THANK YOU, MA'AM, YOU CAN PROCEED.

>> THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR. ALEX, YOU WERE RIGHT, DID YOU A LOT MY PRESENTATION. BECAUSE OF THAT I WILL TRY TO BE AS BRIEF BUT AS INFORMATIVE AS POSSIBLE.

SO HE LAURA IF YOU WOULD GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE, I'D APPRECIATE IT. THIS PROVIDES A QUICK SUMMARY OF THE PRESENTATION WE WILL WALK YOU THROUGH THE DESIGN TEAM QUICKLY. OUR OVERALL VISION FOR SUNSET LANDING. THE REQUESTED PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS, AND THEN WE ARE AVAILABLE TO RESPOND TO ANY QUESTIONS. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

WE HAVE WHAT WE CONSIDER A GREAT GROUP OF DESIGN TEAM MEMBERS.

CENTURY AMERICAN WILL BE THE AMERICAN HAS DONE OVER 25,000 SINGLE FAMILY HOME LOTS IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA, THEY HAVE AN EXCELLENT TRACK RECORD. IN, DESIGN GROUP WHO HAS DONE MUCH OF THE PLAN, AND ENGINEERING HAS AN EXTENSIVE TRACK RECORD IN SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, WHERE CENTURION IS HEAD QUARTERED THEY DID THE 300 ACRE BRANCH.

THE ARCHITECTS, BE RYAN CLINE WITH IN, DESIGN IS ON THE PHONE, AND AS JACK DAWSON, EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT OF CENTURION AMERICAN, AND DERRICK GOODMAN WHO IS THE PROJECT MANAGER FOR

THIS PROJECT IS ONLINE TOO. >> RALPH BUSH WITH BUSH ARCHITECTS. THEY DID A NUMBER OF THE BUILDING DESIGNS THAT YOU WILL SEE TONIGHT, THEY CREATED THOSE.

BUSH ACCIDENT BE TEXT JUST TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF THE MAGNITUDE OF THE DESIGNS THAT THEY DO.

THEY ARE IN CHARGE OF HEADING UP THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE OLD COLLIN CREEK MALL UP THERE IN PLANO IF YOU ARE FAMILIAR WITH THAT. STUDIO 13, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LEONARD REEVES IS ON THE LINE.

[03:50:01]

WE WOULD LIKE TO THANK TYLER CRUZ FOR BEING ONLINE TONIGHT WITH US. THE BAYSIDE LAND PARTNERS, AND HAD I WOULD VERY BRIEFLY LIKE TO SAY OVER THE 6 MONTHS THAT WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH STAFF, I THINK THAT 1 OF THE THINGS THAT HAS BEEN SO NICE WORKING WITH CARLOS AND ALEX IS THAT I BELIEVE THAT WHAT YOU SEE TONIGHT IS BETTER BECAUSE OF THEIR INPUT AND THEIR INSIGHT, AND SO IT TRIAL I HAS BEEN -- WE KIND OF FEEL LIKE THEY'VE BEEN PART OF THE DESIGN TEAM.

WE GREATLY APPRECIATE THE FULL URBAN DESIGN DEPARTMENT, GIVING THEIR SUPPORT OF OUR PROPOSAL AND WITH THAT, BE WE WILL GO TO

THE NEXT SLIDE. >> AND THIS WILL BE OUR YOU VISION NEXT, PLEASE, LAURA. IT IS AS YOU WILL SEE AN INTERCONNECTED AND WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOOD.

CLUSTERS OF HOMES AROUND A WILL CENTRAL LICENSED COMMUNITY GREEN. THIS IS PROBABLY 1 OF THE HALL MARKS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. AND DELIVERING WITH THAT YPES - NEIGHBORHOOD-BASED FROM RETAIL AND RESTAURANT USES.

CURRENTLY THERE ARE NOT ANY AVAILABILITY OF THIS LEVEL OF NEIGHBORHOOD BASED USES WITHIN WALKING DISTANCE.

THERE WILL BE UP THE STREET, BUT NOT IN CLOSE PROXIMITY I AND SO IMPORTANT IS TO FACILITATE PUBLIC MOBILITY THROUGH AN EXTENSIVE NETWORK OF SIDEWALKS, BE PEDESTRIAN CORUTORS AND INTERCONNECTED STREETS AND 1 I THINK THAT 1 OF YOUR PLANNING COMMISSIONER MEMBERS JUST MENTIONED ABOUT THE JOY OF WALKING ALONG THE TRAILS AND SIDEWALKS THROUGH THE BAY SIDE NORTH DEVELOPMENT. NEXT PLEASE, LAURA.

THIS WILL BE GIVE A QUICK IDEA, I THINK THAT YOU UNDERSTAND THAT WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE AND 3 LOTS THAT ARE PROPOSED FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL AND RESTAURANTS ARE JUST ADJACENT H MANY HAD THE MANSION APARTMENTS ARE TO OUR SOUTH, AND THE PLAN BS OR TOWNHOMES ARE NORTH OF US, THEY ARE ANEW NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE NORTH AND WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE AS THE URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD CURRENTLY THE MANY FORM-BASED DISTRICT.

KEY FEATURES, 22 ACRES, THE MAJORITY IS ALREADY ZONED AS URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD. ONLY A SMALL PORTION IS NEW NEIGHBORHOOD. THE REST 10 HOME TIMES AS ALEX HAS SO WELL COVERED 233 HOMES. THE MAJORITY OF THEM BEING SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES AND WITH A SMALL AMOUNT BUT EFFECTIVE AMOUNT OF NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL AND RESTAURANTS AND COMMERCIAL.

SO IT OFFERS A NICE MIX OF THINGS, AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE LAYOUT THERE. WE HAVE A WONDERFUL NETWORK OF STREETS INTERCONNECTION THE THROUGHOUT.

AND A NICE COMPLEMENT ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT, ON EITHER SIDE OF US. NEXT PLEASE, LAURA.

THIS GIVESS YOU AN IDEA OF THE TYPE OF IMAGES, THE TYPE OF HOMES THAT WE ARE LOOKING AT. THESE ARE THE CASITAS.

AS YOU CAN SEE THEY ARE RAISED ELEVATIONS.

WE'VE LOOKED AT -- WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THE INSPIRATION WITH ALICE BEACH DOWN IN FLORIDA. THIS IS NOT FLORIDA, THIS WOULD DEFINITELY HAVE A TEXAS FLAVOR. IT IS VERY IMPORTANT THAT THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES PARTICULARLY HAVE EYES ON THE STREET, INVITE PEOPLE INTO THEIR SPACE AND SO THIS IS THE CONTEXT IN WHICH WE ARE LOOKING AT DEVELOPING 1 PRODUCT, ARE THE SINGLE-FAMILY

HOME >> THE CASITA.

THIS IS AN IMAGE OF THE TOWNHOMES AGAIN, 20 PERCENT OF A MINIMUM OF 20 PERCENT OF OUR HOMES WILL HAVE FRONT PORCHES.

SOME OF THEM MAYBE MORE STOOPS. A GOOD MAJORITY WILL HAVE WHAT -- THE FRONT PORCHES WITH A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET WIDE, AND 7 FEET IN DEPTH. AND AGAIN, THESE, THE TOWNHOMES WILL HAVE EYES ON THE STREET AND WELCOME THE PUBLIC REALM TO BE A PART OF THEIR PRIVATE REALM AS THEY ARE SITUATED ALONG THE

STREET FRONT. >> WILL NEXT PLEASE, LAURA.

>> YOU'VE ALREADY SEEN THE IMAGES FOR THE MIXED RESIDENTIAL CONDOS. AS YOU CAN SEE JUST LOOKING AT THIS, AGAIN THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL DRAWING, BUT IT IS OUR INTENT TO HAVE BALCONIES ON ALL OF THE UNITS.

3 QUARTERS OF THEM WILL ACTUALLY HAVE VIEWS OF THE RAY HUBBARD

[03:55:07]

NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL. AND COFFEE SHOP TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT. IT WILL BECOME AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE SUNSET LANDING AND THE BAYSIDE COMMUNITY.

NEXT LAURA. THIS IS A GLIMPSE OF WHAT WILL COULD BE THE NEIGHBORHOOD-BASED RESTAURANT COMMERCIAL WITH BOAT DOCK ACCESS. THIS IS ONLY A CONCEPT.

1 OF THE THINGS THAT I BELIEVE THAT 1 OF THE COMMISSIONERS WAS- THEY WERE CONCERNED ABOUT THIS POTENTIAL BLOCKING OF VIEWS.

THE SITES OVER 2 ACRES, ABOUT 87,000 SQUARE FEET.

WE HAVE SET A MAXIMUM OF SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT COULD BE BUILT ON THE SITE AS 15,000. SO IT WILL REALLY HAVE A LOW IMPACT ON VIEWS. AND IT'S, AS YOU CAN SEE, 1 IDEA WOULD BE, YOU KNOW THE PLACEMENT OF THESE 2 BUILDINGS WITH A VIEW CORRIDORS THROUGH THERE, AND SO CONCEPTUALLY WE SEE THIS HAVING A LOW IMPACT ON THE VIEWS. OBVIOUSLY IT WILL NOT BE PARK DEVELOPMENT, IT WILL BE WHAT WE CONSIDER A MUCH KNEELED THE NEIGHBORHOOD-BASED RESTAURANT OPPORTUNITY WITH SOME SMALL COMMERCIAL AVAILABLE. BUT IT WILL NOT OCCUPY A GREAT PROPORTION OF THE LOT AS FAR AS STRUCTURE, VERTICAL STRUCTURE.

NEXT PLEASE, LAURA. THE IDEA OF THE CENTRAL LICENSED COMMUNITY GREEN THIS IS 1 OF THE THINGS THAT WE LIKE THE MOST IN THE DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS A CONCEPT OF WHAT IT COULD BE WITH THE -- AT THE BOTTOM WHERE YOU SEE THE FOUNTAIN POSSIBILITY, THAT'S THE ENTRANCE TO THE DEVELOPMENT THERE COULD BE FIRESIDE PITS, PLAYGROUND AREAS, A COMMUNITY HAD SHADE STRUCTURE. BUT THE NICE IDEA IS WE ENVISION THIS GIVING AN OPPORTUNITY FOR A COMMUNITY TO COMING TO TO COMING TO FOR COMMUNITY GATHERINGS AND EVENTS AND ALSO AT THE SAME TIME HAVING AN OPPORTUNITY FOR INFORMAL PLAY AREAS.

NEXT, PLEASE. >> THE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR, FACILITATING MOBILITY. WHAT YOU SEE HERE ARE THE NUMBER OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE PEDESTRIAN TO BE A PRIMARY VEHICLE, IF YOU WILL THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT.

THE BLUE AREAS ARE A 5 FOOT SIDEWALKS.

THE SORT OFPEACH COLOR THERE, OF THE EXISTING 10 FOOT SIDEWALKS, AND THE 12 FOOT TRAIL TO THE SOUTH.

AS YOU SEE, 1 OF THE THINGS THAT WE THINK IS VERY UNIQUE, IS WE HAVE GIVEN CROSS VENTILATION IF YOU WILL TO THE PEDESTRIAN, WHERE THE HE TOWNHOMES AND CASITAS ON THE EDGES OF THE PROPERTY HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO THE COMMUNITY GREEN.

SO WE FEEL THAT THIS IS A STRONG NEIGHBORHOOD ORIENTED COMMUNITY ORIENTED TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT, AND I THINK THAT THIS IS 1 OF THE THINGS THAT WE FEEL THAT IS REALLY VERY BENEFICIAL TO THE OVERALL LAYOUT. NEXT PLEASE, LAURA.

>> OKAY. REQUESTED APPROVE AS.

NEXT PLEASE, LAURA. >> THE FIRST IS OBVIOUSLY THE REZONING FOR THE 2 ACHORS FROM TO URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD.

WE FEEL THAT THIS REZONING WOULD COMEPLEMENT THE DISTRICT.

THE 2 ACRE SITE WE ARE LIMITING FROM 9 TO 15,000 SQUARE FEET OF RESTAURANT AND COMMERCIAL. IT PROVIDES CONVENIENT LAKE SIDE DINING AND RETAIL OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN NEARBY HOMES.

WE LIVE IN A MORE URBANIZED AREA, BUT IT REALLY IS NICE JUST TO BE SUCH AWAY FROM SOMEWHERE YOU ENJOY DINING, AND ENJOYING THE LAKEFRONT. THIS WOULD HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE A DOCK WHERE PEOPLE COULD, IF THEY DID HAVE A BOAT, THEY COULD COME THERE. IT'S BASICALLY THOUGH ORIENTED TO BE NEIGHBORHOOD-BASED. WE WOULD TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE LAKE SIDE FOR OUTDOOR AMENITIES, PHONE POOLS, AND DINING VIEW OFS OF LAKE RAY HUBBARD. WE VIEW THIS AS AN INTEGRAL PART

[04:00:03]

AND WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD ORIENTATION, AND SCALE.

NEXT PLEASE. >> THE SECOND IS THE APPROVAL OF THE SUP, AND I PROMISE I WILL NOT WALK YOU THROUGH THE REASONS WHY WE ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE SUP.

BUT INTERESTINGLY IN THE URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT.

WE ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE 20 PERCENT OF OUR LAND USE US AS MIXED RESIDENTIAL, MIXED EYES OR SHOP FRONT.

IT IS NOT AN OPTION. AND WITH AN 80 PERCENT MAXIMUM BEING SINGLE TYPES OF TOWNHOMES, 0 LOT LINES, CASITAS ARES LIVE WORK, SO IT'S VERY MUCH PART OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR AN URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT. SUNSET COMPLIES WITH THE RATIO ELEMENT, IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S LAND USE PLAN FOR BAYSIDE DISTRICT FOR A MIXED USE DISTRICT.

THE 5-STORY MIX THE USE BUILDING WITH FOR SALE CONDOS, AND RETAIL IS A SUITABLE LOCATION TO SCALE. IF YOU ARE LOOKING AT THIS IS THE FRONT OF THE CONDO DEVELOPMENT, MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT MANY TO THE RIGHT IMMEDIATELY TO THE RIGHT IS THE 4 STORY APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT, SO IT BLENDS WELL, AND THEN IT GETS -- , OFFERS A GRADIATION, OR REDUCTION OF USE OF THE CASITAS TO THE LEFT OF THIS. WE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK JUST BRIEFLY ABOUT THE LETTERS THAT YOU RECEIVED IN OPPOSITION.

A COUPLE OF THE NEIGHBORS THAT ARE NEW TO THE AREA, THE 2 CONCERNS THAT THEY HAD, AND I THINK THAT IT WAS- I DON'T WANT TO SUGGEST MISUNDERSTANDING, BUT IT WAS A VIEW THAT WE WERE DEVELOPING WHEN THEY SEE MULTIFAMILY.

THE CONTEXT IS NOT A 52 UNIT BUILDING, BUT IT'S MORE OR LESS WHAT THEY ARE SEEING FURTHER TO OUR EAST.

A 400 TO 800 UNIT DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS OBVIOUSLY A MUCH MANY SMALLER SCALE, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY IT WOULD BE OWNER OCCUPIED. ALEX MENTIONED -- WE DID RECEIVE A COUPLE OF LETTERS OR YOU RECEIVED A COUPLE OF LETTERS FROM THE ADJACENT LAND OWNER MR. MATTHEW HEILS, WHERE HE SAID EXISTING THE CONDO DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE IN VIOLATION YOU HAVE RESTRICTING COVENANTS AND DEED RESTRICTIONS ANYONE TENDED TO PREVENT SUCH USES AS THOSE PROPOSED.

WHEN WE SEE THAT TYPE OF COMMENT 1 OF THE FIRST THINGS THAT WE DO, AND TYLER CRUZ AS THE LAND OWNER IS CONSULT THE -- YOU HAVE 2 OF THEIR OPINIONS FROM CENTURION AMERICAN, AND THE OTHER IS FROM SHOOP AND VENTURA. AND BOTH OF THOSE SUPPORTED THE FACT, AND CENTURION IS OF THE OPINION THAT THE TITLE DOCUMENTS DO NOT CONTAIN RESTRICTION THAT IS WOULD PREVENT OR PROHIBIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF CONDOMINIUMS ON THE PROPERTY.

THE DEED RESTRICTIONS ARE RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS REALLY ARE A MATTER THAT SHOULD BE MOST APPROPRIATELY ADDRESSED WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RELATED TO ENFORCEMENT OF WHAT ANYONE MIGHT FEAR WOULD BE A VIOLATION OF CCR'S.

AGAIN, WE DO NOT FEEL THAT THERE IS ANY VIOLATION AND THIS IN FACT IS VERY APPROPRIATE USE AND A PERMITTED USE IN THIS DISTRICT. THE THIRD, NEXT PLEASE, LAURA.

THE THIRD IS APPROVAL OF THE SUNSET LANDINGS FRAMEWORK PLAN, AND I BELIEVE THAT ALEX, YOU'VE DONE AN EXCELLENT JOB IN PRESENTING THE INTENT OF THE FRAMEWORK PLAN, AND I THINK REALLY WHERE WE NEED TO GO NEXT IS TALK ABOUT THE VARIATION'S THAT WE ARE REQUESTING, AND WHY WE ARE REQUESTING THOSE, AND IF LAURA YOU WOULD GO TO THE NECK SLIDE WE WOULD APPRECIATE IT.

AND 1 MORE SLIDE. >> OBVIOUSLY 1 MORE SLIDE.

THE FRAMEWORK PLAN, WE ARE REQUESTING 1 OF THE VARIATIONS IS ALLOWING FOR 50 FOOT RESIDENTIAL STREETS WITH 5 FOOT SIDEWALKS. THIS IS HIGHLY CONSISTENT WITH RESIDENTIAL RIGHT OF WAY STANDARD THROUGHOUT BAYSIDE NORTH. IN FACT NONE OF THE RESIDENTIAL WILL STREETS WITHIN BAYSIDE NORTH ARE DEVELOPED WITH WIDER STREETS THAN 50 FOOT INVITES OF WAYS, IT IS CONSISTENT WITH TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS AND THE 5 FOOT SIDEWALKS AGAIN, THAT IS HIGHLY CONSISTENT THROUGHOUT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD WITH THOSE

[04:05:03]

THE NEXT IS THE PERMITTING A MINIMUM 9 PERCENT OPEN SPACE, AND OPEN SPACE TO BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED.

I BELIEVE THAT HAS BEEN VERY WELL PRESENTED BIALENTION, AND H / ON BY AALEX , WHEN AN AT 3 HE PERCENT OF THE SUNSET SPACE IS CONTAINED WITHIN THE COMMUNITY GREEN WHICH GIVES YOU A STRONG PLACE FOR COMMUNITY GATHERINGS SPECIAL EVENTS AND INFORMAL PLAY.

IT'S A REAL ASSET IT WOULD BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED BY A HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION, AND I THINK THAT 1 OF THE OTHER ASPECTS ABOUT THIS IS DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM SUNSET LANDING IS A LARGE PARK OF ALMOST 3 ACRES.

SO THERE'S A GREAT DEAL OF OPEN SPACE THAT WE HAVE AVAILABLE, BOTH PRIVATE AND PUBLIC THAT WE FEEL THAT MEETS THE INTENT OF THE FORM-BASED CODE. THE NEXT IS ALLOWING CASITA HOMES TO HAVE A MAXIMUM OF 24 HOW ABOUT SQUARE FEET.

WE'VE HAD A LOT OF DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS.

THIS REQUEST ONLY RELATES TO THE CASITA LOTS.

ALL OF THE TOWNHOME LOTS DO NOT ACTUALLY HAVE A MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE. HOWEVER THE CASITA LOTS STANDARD HOME STANDARD BY THE FORM-BASED CODE IS 800 TO 1400 SQUARE FOOT HOMES. THAT'S WOULD BE UNUSUAL IN THIS DEVELOPMENT, IN FACT IN FACT 1 WOULD NOT ACTUALLY BE ABLE TO DEVELOP IT ON THE SIZE LOTS THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE WITHIN THE URBAN DISTRICT OR THE NEW NEIGHBORHOOD.

1 OF THE THINGS THAT WE DID DO IS WE LOOKED AT WHAT IS CURRENTLY BEING BUILT WITHIN THE BAYSIDE NORTH DEVELOPMENT, AND ALL OF THE CASITA HOMES THAT WE THAT ARE PRESENTLY BUILT ARE A MINIMUM OF 2200 SQUARE FEET. I KNOW THAT WHEN 1 SAYS ALL THERE MAY BE 1 THAT WE MISSED BUT PREDOMINANTLY THEY RANGE IN SIZE FROM 2300 SQUARE FEET TO 2500 SQUARE FEET.

IT IS A HOME SIZE THAT IN 2017 WHEN STAFF WAS REVIEWING BAYSIDE NORTH'S REQUEST, THAT THEY WERE HIGHLY SUPPORTIVE OF THE REQUEST FORECAST EAT AS TO BE APPROVED AT 2500 AREA FEET.

2500 SQUARE FEET IS A REASONABLE SIZE.

WE DON'T ANTICIPATE ALL OF THEM -- WE ARE REQUESTING 2400 SQUARE FEET. THE THIS SIZE HOME IS A VERY TYPICAL HOME SIZE THAT WE ARE SEEING IN THE METRO AREA, I BELIEVE THAT THE CHAIR PERSON TALKED ABOUT WE ARE SEEING LARGER HOMES AND SMALLER LOTS. AND IT IS PARTICULARLY 1 THAT PEOPLE WITH CHILDREN A KEY TARGET AREA THAT WE ARE LOOKING AT WOULD LOOK TO HAVE. SO WE FEEL THAT THIS IS A REASONABLE -- IT IS NOT OVERSTEPPING THE INTENT OF THE URBAN DISTRICT AND WE THINK THAT IT WORKS WELL WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF WHAT HAS BEEN DEVELOPED IN BAYSIDE NORTH.

NEXT, IF YOU WOULD, LAURA. THE.

IT ADDRESS HE IS THE DIMENSION ALAN SETBACK VARIATIONS.

VERY QUICKLY, THE SIDE YARD LOT -- SIDE YARDS FOR 0 LOT LINES BEING REQUESTED IS 1 IN 4. I BELIEVE THAT IT'S NOT UNLIKE THE ONES THAT THERE WAS A REQUEST ON BAYSIDE NORTH CAST EAT A LOTS FOR REDUCTION OF THE SIDE YARD LOTS.

IF YOU WILL LOOK OVER TO YOUR RIGHT, THIS IS AN ILLUSTRATION OF THE -- WHAT THAT STANDARD, HOW THAT STANDARD MIGHT BE BUILT. THIS IS VERY TYPICAL AND WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN, AND AS YOU SEE, THERE'S A VERY LARGE AMOUNT OF

[04:10:05]

AND YOU DO THAT BY, YES, REDUCING THE AREA YOU HAVE THE PRIVATE LAND AREA SO THAT YOU CAN ALLOCATE THAT TO PUBLIC SPACE. IT REALLY CAN BE A SET TO THE COMMUNITY. SO THAT IS MUCH OF WHAT WE WERE THINKING THAT THESE CASITA HOMES, THEY ARE REASONABLE, THEY ARE WELL CITED AND THIS IS VERY MUCH LIKE PRODUCTS THAT YOU ARE SEEING THROUGHOUT THE METRO AREA BEING BUILT ITED AND THIS IS VE MUCH LIKE PRODUCTS THAT YOU ARE SEEING THROUGHOUT THE METRO AREA BEING BUILT SITED AND THIS IS V MUCH LIKE PRODUCTS THAT YOU ARE SEEING THROUGHOUT THE METRO AREA BEING BUILT TODAY.

THE OF WE ARE REQUESTING THAT THE BUILD-TO ZONE INSTEAD OF BEING 5 TO 10 FETA LONG SUNSET BOULEVARD, THAT IT BE 5 TO 14.

WE ARE SPECIFICALLY REQUESTING THAT BECAUSE ALONG SUNSET BOULEVARD THERE'S A 5 FATTY EASEMENT THAT IS ALREADY ON OUR PROPERTY, AND THAT WOULD CONCERN US, IF WE ARE NOT ABLE TO STEP THE HOME BACK A LITTLE BIT FURTHER TO GET- TO ACCOMMODATE

THE PRESENCE OF THAT ASEMENT. >> MINIMAL LOT WIDTH OF 22 FEET FOR TOWNHOMES IS VERY STANDARD. ALL OF THE DOWNHOMES THAT HAD THEY ARE DEVELOPING NEXT DOOR TO US, IS ALL 22 FEET IN WIDTH.

WE ARE JUST ASKING THAT WE BE PERMITTED TO DEVELOP WHAT IS ALREADY VERY COMMON WITHIN THE BY SIDE NORTH AREA.

MINIMAL LOT DEPTH, 73 FEET FEET FOR THE TOWN HOMES ADJACENT TO THE RAILROAD TRACK. IF YOU WILL, LAURA IF YOU CAN GO BACK, I AM NOT SURE WHICH, IT'S NOT VERY FAR.

THERE, THERE WE GO. THE HOMES ADJACENT TO THE RAILROAD TRACKS, VERY NORTHERN PART OF THE DRAWING HERE, BAYSIDE NORTH DRIVE, BAYSIDE DRIVE COMES IN AT A VERY STRONG ANGLE TO OUR EAST AND TO OUR WEST THE BAY SIDE DRIVE FOR THE TOWN HOMES IS A LITTLE FURTHER DOWN.

WE ARE HAVING TO NEGOTIATE TRYING TO MAKE THOSE STREETS -- THAT STREET ALIGN AND WHAT IS, WHAT THAT CREATES IS A MORE SHALLOW LOT AREA. THESE ARE THE ONLY LOTS THAT WE HADN'TIS PATBEING SHALLOWER. IN FACT EVERY LOT THAT YOU SEE ON THIS DRAWING MEETS THE STANDARDS AS FAR AS LOT DEPTH, AND SO THESE ARE THE ONLY LOTS THAT WE ANTICIPATE AND NEED TO BE SHALLOWER THAN THE 90 FEET THAT ARE REQUIRED.

OKAY LAURA, IF YOU COULD GO BACK AND THERE YOU GO.

THANK YOU. AND LASTLY, IS THE TOWNHOME MINIMUM SIDE YARD OF 0 IN THE PEDESTRIAN OPEN SPACE.

THIS IS A REQUEST THAT WE FEEL THAT THE CODE REQUIRES THE SIDE YARD OF NONABUTTING TOWN HOMES TO BE 5 FEET.

WE FEEL THAT MOST OF THE TIME THEY CURES RIGHT ADJACENT TO THOSE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDORS THAT YOU SEE THAT WE HAVE THROUGHOUT OUR DEVELOPMENT. WE FEEL THAT GREATER GOOD WOULD BE HAD BY THOSE AREAS BEING WITHIN COMMON OPEN SPACE, AND NOT BEING FENCED OFF AS PRIVATE OPEN SPACE FOR THE TOWN HOMES.

THE 5 FEET WHICH WOULD LESSEN THOSE AREAS.

SO IF THIS IS JUST A REQUIREMENT THAT WE ARE THAT WE ARE REQUIRED TO DO TO ENSURE THAT WE MEET YOUR FORM-BASED CODE THAT WE REQUEST THIS VARIATION. SO THAT WRAPS UP THE VARIATION'S WE NEED. 1 OF THE THINGS THAT I WOULD LIKE TO SHARE WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS IS THIS IS AN AMENDMENT TO THE EXISTING FRAMEWORK PLAN.

WHAT YOU HAVE ON YOUR TABLE RIGHT NOW IS FOR THIS FRAMEWORK PLAN EXISTING FRAMEWORK PLAN WAS ABOUT 2251-STORY RENTAL UNITS THAT WERE SERVICED BY ESSENTIALLY FIRE LANES THAT WERE ALL GATED. THIS IS A WE FEEL, AND I BELIEVE STAFF IS SUPPORTIVE OF THIS IS THAT THIS IS A MUCH BETTER BY FAR DEVELOPMENT MANY PLAN FOR THE BAY SIDE NORTH COMMUNITY E

HE >> WE WOULD HAVE PREFERRED HE TO NOT HAVE ASKED FOR ANY VARIATIONS.

THIS IS A CHALLENGING SITE, THE ELEVATION GOES UP ALMOST 25 FEET

[04:15:04]

WE WOULD NOT ASK YOU TO DO ANYTHING WE DIDN'T HAVE TO TO HAVE TO MAKE THIS DEVELOPMENT WORK.

AND WE WORKED A LONG TIME WITH STAFF TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE HEARING WHAT YOU ARE SAYING, AND DELIVER WHAT YOU NEED.

AND WE FEEL LIKE THIS DOES THIS VERY WELL.

WE DO UNDERSTAND THERE MAY BE QUESTIONS, AND CERTAINLY PLEASED. WE HAVE OUR DEVELOPMENT TEAM, AND I AM READY FOR QUESTIONS, IF YOU WILL.

>> . .

>> OKAY, COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?

BE ANYBODY? >>.

>> I WILL STEP OUT THERE. AND MAYBE THIS IS A LITTLE CONFUSION ON MY PART. MAYBE THIS IS FOR THE DEVELOPER.

SHE SHE MENTIONED ABOUT THE PREVIOUS PLAN, ABOUT BEING RENTAL UNITS YOU SINGLE-FAMILY -- WE LOST THEM AGAIN.

>> CAN YOU NOT HEAR ME? >>.

>> CAN YOU HEAR ME, ROBERT? >> I CAN HEAR YOU ROBERT JUST

FINE. >> NEVER MIND. I WILL BE RIGHT BACK. SO WAS MY QUESTION HEARD?

>> NO GO AHEAD AND REPEAT IT >> MY QUESTION IS FOR THE DEVELOPER. I JUST WANT TO GET SOME CLARITY ON THE COMMENT THAT SHE MADE ABOUT WHAT WAS PREVIOUSLY SET UP HERE. IT WAS SOMETHING THAT I WAS UNFAMILIAR WITH. SHE IS SHE WAS TALKING ABOUT RENTAL UNITS THAT ARE LIKE IN ALLEYS THAT ARE LIKE IN A FENCED-OFF AREA. I WANT TO KNOW WHAT WAS THAT.

WHAT WERE WE LOOKING AT COMPARED TO WHAT WE WERE LOOKING AT

TODAY. >> I WILL CERTAINLY SHARE MY RESPONSE, BUT PERHAPS STAFF MAY BE BETTER ABLE.

WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO GO FIRST, MADAM CHAIR, AND THEN STAFF

CORRECT ME? >> OR IF STAFF WANTS TO GO TOO.

>> I WILL GO AHEAD AND JUMP IN ON THAT 1.

BECAUSE WE HAVE SEEN A FEW OF THESE PROPOSALS COME ACROSS OUR VIRTUAL DESKS SO TO SPEAK IN PAST FEW, 8 MONTHS SINCE I'VE BEEN HERE WITH THE CITY. AND IT'S --

>> ALEX, WE LOST YOUR AUDIO AGAIN.

>> I SAW MY BUTTON IS LIT UP. SO NOW I AM STILL HERE AGAIN.

>> THEY CALL THIS SINGLE-FAMILY IT IS A PRODUCT WHERE WITH WHAT THEY ARE TRYING TO DO IS HAVE A LOWER DENSITY I BOTH AND ALSO SINGLE STORY TYPICAL RANCH HOMES THAT ARE ORIENTED AROUND HE GREEN SPACES, OPEN SPACES, NOT ACTUAL STREETS.

THEY ARE MORE ACCESS DRIVES FROM WHAT WE'VE SEEN, THE BITS OF OF THE SCHEMATIC PLANS, VERY EARLY PRELIMINARY PLANS THAT THEY SHARE WITH US ON THAT. IT IS AN EMERGING CONSET.

THERE ARE SOME OF THESE PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN BUILT IN THE METRO PLEX. IN FACT ACTUALLY THE DEVELOPER, AVILA, FOLKS HAVE PROJECTS THAT HAVE BEEN BUILT IN THE METRO HE PLEX. IT IS DIFFICULT IN THE ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR US TO FIGURE OUT HOW IT FITS IN -- HOW THAT PRODUCT WOULD BE, WOULD BE -- IT WOULD REQUIRE A LOT OF VARIATIONS TO THE CODE. TO THE RDC.

THE FORM-BASED CODE I WILL LET CARLOS SPEAK MORE TOWARD THAT HOW IT MIGHT BE ACCOMPLISHED UNDER THE FORM-BASED CODE AND ALSO PERHAPS AS TO WHAT THE CURRENT FRAMEWORK PLAN DOES

ALLOW ON THE SITE. >> CERTAINLY, JUST TO TOUCH A LITTLE BIT ON THAT. IT'S KIND OF A WEIRD SCENARIO, BECAUSE THE FORM-BASED CODE DOESN'T TYPICALLY ALLOW FOR THIS TYPE OF SITE DEVELOPMENT, THE RENTAL, BECAUSE IT DOES REQUIRE A SINGLE LARGE LOT, AND THEN IT SIMPLY PUTS UNITS WITHIN THIS LOT TYPICAL OF MULTIFAMILY FAMILY DEVELOPMENT.

SO BECAUSE THE FORM-BASED CODE TYPICALLY REQUIRES LOTS WITH

[04:20:04]

AS TO HOW THAT HAPPENED FOR THE THE AVILA PROJECT WE DON'T HAVE ALL OF THE SPECIFIC DETAILS, AND AS WHEN WE DISCUSSED THE ZONING PROJECT WE ALSO DIDN'T HAVE SPECIFICITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT, SIMPLY AN OVERVIEW OF WHAT THEY WANTED TO DO, AND LIKE THINK THEY WOULD HAVE COME FORWARD AS MAJOR WARRANTIES, WHICH ARE PART OF THEIR DEVELOPMENT PLAN WHICH ARE NOT NECESSARILY REQUESTED AT THE REZONING. BUT THIS PROJECT, WHAT IT DOES, IT REFRAMES FOR LACK OF A BETTER TERM, THIS DEVELOPMENT, ALLOWING FOR THE FORM-BASED CODE CODE TO ONCE AGAIN BE THE ENFORCING FACTOR BEHIND THIS PROJECT IN TERMS OF BUILDING AND LOT DEVELOPMENT WITH THE REQUESTED CONDITIONS.

>> THANK YOU. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? OR STAFF?

ANYBODY. >> THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING SO WE WILL NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I WILL TURN IT OVER

TO YOU LAURA. >> WE HAVE NO CALLERS ON THE

LINE, MADAM CHAIR. >> SUSAN, HAVE WE GOT ANYTHING

FOR YOU TO READ? >> WE DO NOT HAVE ANY WRITTEN

COMMENTS. >> WITH THAT, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AND YES, JOHN, GO AHEAD.

>> WELL, CAN I ASK CAN GO WE APPROVE THESE OR MAKE A MOTION ON THESE 1 AT A TIME? AND THE REASON THAT I ASK THAT IS BECAUSE I THINK THAT 2 OF THEM ARE FAIRLY STRAIGHT FORWARD. BUT THE THIRD 1 WHICH IS TALKING ABOUT AMENDMENTS TO THE FRAMEWORK PLAN HAVE SOME ISSUES IN THERE THAT WE SHOULD PROBABLY DISCUSS BEFORE WE VOTE ON.

DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT I AM SAYING?

>> ARE YOU OKAY WITH THAT? >> ABSOLUTELY WE WOULD WANT YOU

TO VOTE ON THEM INDEPENDENTLY. >> OKAY, GREAT.

THANK YOU, JOHN. >> GO AHEAD.

>> IN THIS CASE, WOULD UNLIKE ME TO MAKE A MOTION TO START?

>> SURE >> I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REZONE FOR APPROXIMATELY 2.038 NEIGHBORS, FROM A FORM-BASED BASED URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT.

>> OKAY, THAT'S BASICALLY ITEM NUMBER 1.

RIGHT. WHICH WAS THE REZONING OF 3 PARCELS. OKAY.

SO WE HAVE A MOTION HOE THE FLOOR FROM MR. JOHN COTE FOR APPROVAL OF THE FIRST ITEM WHICH IS THE REZONING OF THE 3 PARCELS. DO WE HAVE A SECOND?

>> WE HAVE A SECOND FROM MR. ENGEN.

MR. SEGARS DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO CONTRIBUTE ON THIS, WITH THE

REZONING. >> NO CONCERNS, NO ISSUES.

>> MR. ENTROP? >> NO NOT AT THIS TIME.

NO QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS. >> MR. ENGEN?

>> NO. >> MR. SWIFT?

>> NOTHING AT THIS TIME. I WILL SEE HOW IT TURNS OUT.

IT IS SOMETHING DEFINITELY UNIQUE TO ME?

>> MR. WINTON? >> I JUST HAD A COMMENT, THE ONLY THING THAT I WOULD SAY IS IF WE TOOK WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED OF AGE PRESENTED IT TO THE CITIZENS WHO WE REPRESENT, I THINK THAT IT WOULD NOT BE VERY FAVORABLE BY A LANDSLIDE.

I JUST DON'T KNOW THAT WITH EVERYTHING THAT'S GONE ON OUT THERE, AND YOU LOOK AT THE OTHER BUILDINGS, IT'S JUST A LOCATION, AND PROBABLY TIMING. BUT YOU MENTIONED MULTIFAMILY TO THE GENERAL POPULATION THAT LIVES IN ROWLETT.

IT'S NOT A GOOD SUBJECT. ALTHOUGH WE HAD VERY FEW THAT LIVE AROUND THERE. THERE'S NOT A LOT WITHIN THE 20500 THAT ARE GOING TO BE ABLE TO GET NOTICES.

BUT REGARDLESS IF WE VOTED ON ALL 3 OR INDIVIDUALLY I CAN'T SUPPORT THAT AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITIZENS OF ROWLETT BASED OFF OF THIS. SO THAT'S MY COMMENTS, THE

[04:25:04]

>> THAT'S CORRECT, COMMISSIONER COTE, AND JUST TO ADD SOME FOOD FOR THOUGHT. 1 OF THE ELEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE REQUEST IS THE APPROVAL OF AN OVERALL FRAMEWORK PLAN AS WELL AS YOUR THIRD POINT THAT YOU ARE GOING TO CONSIDER.

SO JUST WANTED TO CHIME IN WITH THAT.

>> RIGHT, WE ARE NOT TO THAT POINT.

>> DES PROOF 1 OR WHATNOT. THAT'S WHAT I WANTED TO GET CLARIFIED FOR STEVEN IS THE FACT THAT THIS IS JUST TALKING ABOUT THAT 2 ACRES TO CHANGE IT SO THAT THEY CAN DO LIKE RABIDITIES OR SOMETHING DOWN THAT IN THAT AEA.

>> CORRECT. >> WILL ANY OTHER COMMENTS?

>> I THINK THAT I GOT EVERYBODY. >>REPORTER: THE I GUESS AT THIS TIME WE ARE READY TO VOTE ON MR. COTE'S MOTION, THIS IS ON THE FIRST ITEM WHICH IS THE REOWNING OF THE 3 PARCELS, A LITTLE OVER 2 ACRES, ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.

>> WE GOT A YES FROM SEGARS, ESTEVEZ, ENTROP, ENGEN, SWIFT

AND COTE. >>.

ALL OPPOSED THEY HAVE MR. WINTON.

SO THAT MOTION CARRIES. ETCH, SO WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE REST OF IT. MR. COTE GO AHEAD.

>> NOT THE REST OF IT. BUT ANOTHER PORTION OF IT.

>> OKAY. >> I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL USE PURPOSE FOR THE MULTIFAMILY DWELLING, FORM-BASED

URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT. >> WE HAVE QUITE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE SUP, APPROXIMATELY 1.6 ACRES.

DO WE HAVE A SECOND? >>

>> MR. ENGEN, SECOND OF THE MOTION.

APPROVAL FROM MR. COTE, AND SECOND FROM MR. ENGEN.

LET'S TALK ABOUT IT MR. SEGARS >> I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING.

>> JOHN DO YOU WANT TO ADD SOMETHING? I'M SORRY, QUINN HOLD ON MINUTE, JOHN DO YOU WANT TO ADD

SOMETHING? >> I WANTED TO JUST MAKE A NOTE THAT THIS IS BASED ON JUST A RECENT CHANGE THAT WE MADE IN ORDER TO CONTROL MULTIFAMILY UNITS, AND IN ALL ACTUALLIUALITY IT WAS TO GIVE APARTMENT COMPLEXES A MORE STRINGENT LOOK.

AND THIS AS IT'S PROPOSED IS CONDOMINIUMS SO THEY ARE OWNER-OCCUPIED SPACES NOT APARTMENTS.

>> OKAY. >> MR. SEGARS GO AHEAD.

>> FROM WHAT COMMISSIONER COTE WAS SAYING I AM ALL ONBOARD WITH THAT. I HAVE NO ISSUES OR CONCERNS

>> MR. ENTROP. >> MY ONLY COMMENT I GUESS REALLY IS TOWARDS MR. COTE. JUST WANTED TO MAKE A NOTE, JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE COPPED OWES DOES NOT MEAN THAT THEY ARE SPECIFICALLY GOING TO BE BE OWNER OCCUPIED UNITS.

MY CORRECTION WOULD BE THAT THAT THEY WILL BE OWNER OWNED UNITS, BECAUSE AN OWNER CAN STILL PURCHASE IT AND CHOOSE TO RENT OUT THEIR OWN SINGLE-FAMILY, OR THEIR OWN UNIT THAT THEY OWN.

>> JUST LIKE A HOUSE. >> JUST LIKE A HOUSE.

>> IT JUST HELPS ME TO CLARIFY THAT POINT.

THAT'S ALL THAT I HAD. >> MR. ENTROP.

>> THAT'S A GOOD POINT THAT YOU BROUGHT UP AUSTIN.

I DON'T KNOW IF TO THE DEVELOPER CAN MAKE A POINT THAT WHOEVER BUYS IT, IF IT'S IN THEIR BYLAWS, OR HOWEVER THEY SET UP THEIR HOA, THAT YOU DO HAVE TO OWN THAT PROPERTY.

I THINK THAT WE CAN MENTION THAT TO THEM, AND MAYBE THEN CAN CONSIDER THAT. BUT I GUESS IN MY MIND, WHEN YOU START LOOKING AT ALL OF THESE PIECES OF PROPERTY COMING TOGETHER, IT CAN BE A NIGHTMARE FOR TRAFFIC IN THERE

>> MR. SWIFT? >> NOTHING TO ADD.

>> MR. WINTON? >> I THINK THAT WITH THE 119,000

[04:30:02]

SUPPORT THIS. >> OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR BY MR. COTE FOR APPROVAL OF THE SUP, AND WE'VE GOT A SECOND BY MR. ENTROP. ALL IN FAVOR, PLEASE RAISE YOUR

HAND. >> WE'VE GOT A HAND UP FOR SEGARS, ESTEVEZ, ARE ENTROP, ENT ENTROP, ENGEN COTE AND SWIFT. ALL OPPOSED?

>> MR. WINTON SO THAT ITEM CARRIES.

JOHN YOU ARE ON A ROLE. . THE MY NEXT MOTION WOULD BE TO DISAPPROVE THE PLAN FOR SINGLE-FAMILY AND MIXED USE

BUILDINGS. >> OKAY.

WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO DENY ITEM 3, WHICH IS TO APPROVE AMENDMENT TO THE FRAMEWORK PLAN. DO WE HAVE A SECOND ON MR.

COTE'S MOTION TO DENY? >> WE HAD A SECOND BY MR. WINTON. OKAY.

WE WILL VOTE THEN. ALL IN FAVOR.

>> CAN WE HAVE A DISCUSSION AGAIN SO THAT WE KNOW EXACTLY

WHAT WE ARE VOTING FOR. >> I AM JUST GOING DOWN THE ROAD. SO I AM STARTING WITH YOU AGAIN,

QUINN. >> I DON'T HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THE DENIAL. I WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS. THEY OBVIOUSLY HAVE A STRONGER

OPINION ON IT. >> CAN YOU HAVE JOHN EXPLAIN IT

PLEASE. >> THE REASON WHY I RECOMMENDED DISAPPROVAL IS BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW.

>> SHE MAY BE ABLE TO TELL ME THAT I CAN'T BREAK OUT EACH AND EVERYONE OF THESE REQUIREMENTS. SO THEY ARE ALL LUMPED TOGETHER, AND I HAVE TO SAY YEA OR NAY TO THE WHOLE THING.

>> THIS IS MY INTERPRETATION OF IT, AND THAT IS THAT THEY ARE ASKING FOR A CHANGE IN THE SIZE OF THE SIDEWALK, WHICH IS OKAY WITH ME, BECAUSE THAT'S THE SAME AS THE NEIGHBORHOOD NEXT DOOR.

AND THEY ARE ASKING FOR A CHANGE IN THE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH FROM 25 TO 30, TO 22, WHICH IS OKAY. JUST LIKE NEXT DOOR.

REVISED THE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH FOR SINGLE-FAMILYTOWNHOME PRODUCT FROM 90 TO 73 FETAJACENT TO THE RAILROAD ARES I CAN SEE WHY THAT REQUEST IS NEEDED AND WE CAN LIVE WITH IT.

BECAUSE OF THE SMALL NUMBER OF UNITS AFFECTED THERE.

REVISE THE BUILD-TO ZONE FORECAST EAT A LOTS ABUTTING SUNSET BOULEVARD FROM THE REQUESTED 5 TO 10 FEET TO 5 TO 15 FEET. AGAIN, I CAN SEE THAT.

THAT SHOULDN'T BE A PROBLEM. WHERE BUTT WHERE DO I HOLD AN EXCEPTION TO IS TO DECREASE THE CASITA DWELLING SIZE OR EXCUSE ME TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DWELLING SIZE OF CASITA TO 2400 SQUARE FEET FROM ITS 850 SQUARE FEET MAXIMUM DWELLING AREA. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THIS ON A COUPLE OF OCCASIONS AND WE'VE LOUD THAT TO INCREASE FROM WHAT REQUIREMENT IT IS, BUT WE'VE NEVER HAD IT GONE TO 2400 SQUARE FEET, THAT NO LONGER IS A CASITA.

THAT'S A HOUSE, AND THEN 2, DECREASE THE MINIMUM OF SIDE YARD SETBACKS FROM THE CASITA FROM A 0 LOT LINE PRODUCT FROM THE REQUIRED 3 FOOTAGE 7 TO 1 AND 4, AND I JUST THINK THAT THAT MAKES PEOPLE WHO ARE OWNING A HOME FEEL LIKE PEOPLE ARE RIGHT ON TOP OF THEM WHEN YOU DO THAT.

>> AND THEN THE OTHER 1 THAT I WASN'T REAL HAPPY ABOUT, IF I CAN FIND IT REAL QUICK, WAS THE GOING TO THE 0 FEET, DECREASE THE MINIMUM SIDE YARD FOR SINGLE-FAMILYTOWNHOME PRODUCTS TO 0 FEET FOR LOTS ABUTTING PEDESTRIAN OPEN SPACE CORRIDORS.

>> THAT BASICALLY WOULD ALLOW PEOPLE TO BE RIGHT ON TOP OF YOUR WINDOW IF YOU HAVE A WINDOW ON THAT SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, AND I AM NOT SURE THAT THAT'S A GOOD PRACTICE.

SO THAT WAS MY THOUGHT. >> SO I WANT TO ASK YOU A

[04:35:03]

AM I MISSING ON THAT 1? >> I THINK THAT THE WHOLE IDEA BEHIND WHAT WE ORIGINALLY WROTE OR ACCEPTED FOR THESE FORM-BASED CODES WAS THAT YOU END UP WITH A MIX OF HOUSES.

MIX OF HOUSING TYPES. MIX OF SIZES SO THAT YOU HAVE ACTUALLY DIFFERENT PRICE POINTS IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD, AND WHEN WE START SAYING LET'S GET RID OF THAT PRICE POINT THAT'S AT THE LOWER END, YOU ARE DRIVING PEOPLE OUT OF THAT AREA.

I GET IT. SO YOUR ARGUMENT IS THAT YOU HAVE 2 DIFFERENT NAMES, BUT ULTIMATELY YOU ARE SELLING THE SAME PRODUCT UNDER A DIFFERENT NAME.

>> THAT AND THE FACT THAT WE THEN DEFEAT THE WHOLE IDEA BEHIND THE INITIAL PLAN WHICH WAS TO GIVE PEOPLE AN OPPORTUNITY TO WILL YOU HAVE IN DIFFERENT AREAS.

AND OF COURSE, THE DEVELOPER WANTS TO ELIMINATE THAT BECAUSE THEY WANT THEIR PRICE POINT HIGH.

THEY WANT TO SELL A BIGGER PRODUCT.

>> CAN WE HAVE AN EXPLANATION FROM STAFF WITH THE TERMNOLOGY OF "CASITA" AND THIS BEING APPLIED IN THIS SITUATION?

>>. >> I SPEAK TO THIS NEVER PASSING THE COUNCIL. BUT I CAN PROVIDE AT LEAST 2 EXAMPLES IN THE LAST YEAR AND A HALF WHERE HOMESTEAD DID RECEIVE A 2500 MAXIMUM FOR A CASITA. AND IN NORTH HAVEN AS PART OF THEIR INITIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN RECEIVED UP TO 2600.

THAT'S NOT ON TO SAY THAT WE SHOULDN'T USE THAT AS PRECEDENT I AM JUST CLARIFYING THAT WE'VE SEEN THAT REQUEST COME THROUGH.

IT IS NOT UNPRECEDENTED, PER SE. TWIECHT DIVERSIFICATION OF BUILDING SIZES WITH CASITA BEING THE SMALLEST PRODUCT.

WITH SOME PEOPLE HAD CONSIDERING THEM ON THE TINY HOUSE SPECTRUM TO THE EXTENT BEGINNING AT 850 UP TO 1400 SQUARE FEET.

THERE HAVE BEEN SEVERAL CONVERSATION ABOUT HOW THIS MODEL DOESN'T PARTICULARLY FIT THE CURRENT HOUSING MARKET, AND PERHAPS RAISING IT TOING SOMETHING THAT'S STILL FITTING IN OUR QUOTE UNQUOTE DWELLING SIZE LADDER.

OFTENTIMES CONSIDERED BETWEEN 1,802,000 AS A MAXIMUM FORECAST EAT AS. AND I BELIEVE THAT YOU GUYS HAVE HAD THIS DISCUSSION AS WELL AS PART OF THE COMMISSION.

BUT YOU, YES, YOUR INITIAL PREMISE IS CORRECT THAT THERE ARE CERTAIN PARAMETERS STAND. WITH CASITA BEING THE SMALLEST BOTH FOR PRICE POINTS AS WELL AS FOR SIMPLY THE SOCIAL IMPACT, THE SOCIAL IMPACT OF HAVING A MAYORAL HOME AND FOR PEOPLE WHO JUST WANT A SMALLER HOME, AND A SMALLER LOT

>> AND I APPRECIATE THAT CARLOS, AND I DIDN'T REALIZE THAT WE ACTUALLY APPROVED THAT. I LOST THE ARGUMENT THERE.

HRJTS I WOULD LIKE TO ELABORATE ON COMMISSION, BE YOU MAKE YOUR MOTION AND MOVE FORWARD WITH IT, HOWEVER YOU CHOOSE TO DO IT.

OF YES, YOU ARE VOTING ON THOSE ITEMS INDIVIDUALLY AT THE END OF OF THE DAY, THEY ARE FOR INSTANCE WITH THE FRAMEWORK PLAN, , THE FRAMEWORK PLAN INCORPORATES THE CHANGE IN ZONING AND THE SUP, FOR THE MULTIFAMILY.

SO A LITTLE BIT TRICKY I UNDERSTAND.

BUT IF YOU APPROVE 1 OVER THE OTHER WITHOUT A FRAMEWORK PLAN THEN THOSE ARE ELEMENTS THAT COULD ALSO END UP BEING A LITTLE

[04:40:05]

PLAIN THAT COMPONENT TOO. >> WELL NOW, I DIDN'T SAY THAT WE ARE NOT APPROVING A FRAMEWORK PLAN.

>> WE ARE NOT JUST APPROVING EXCEPTIONS TO THE FRAMEWORK PLAN

THAT THEY WANT. >> ABSOLUTELY.

AND YOU CAN ABSOLUTELY CONDITION THE APPROVAL OF THE FRAMEWORK

PLAN. >> NOW YOUR TELLING ME THAT I

COULD TAKE SOME AND NOT. >> THAT IS SOMETHING TO CONSIDER. ANOTHER THING THAT WE SHOULD TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION AS FAR AS THE CASITAS, AND THE SIZE.

THE I AM TOLDLY WITH YOU ON THAT JOHN, WITH THE WHOLE IDEA OF HAVING MULTIPLE SIZE TYPES AND HOMES TO CHOOSE FROM

>> HOWEVER, WE ARE ON A LAKE HERE, WE ARE ON A LAKE, AND WE ARE ALWAYS COMPLAINING ABOUT THE PRODUCT BEING TOO SMALL.

THEY ARE WANTING TO GO BIGGER, AND I DON'T KNOW THAT I AM COMPLETELY AGAINST THAT. IT'S JUST A THOUGHT

>> THAT WE DO HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR, AND WE DO NEED TO

VOTE IT. >> UNLESS YOU WANT TO AMEND IT

JOHN. >> NO?

OKAY. >> WELL, I AM ALWAYS AMENABLE TO CHANGE. HOWEVER, I DON'T KNOW HOW TO MAKE THAT. I MEAN IS THERE ANY OTHER -- ARE THERE ANY OTHER COMMENTS CONCERNING THE VARIOUS REQUESTS

IN THAT? >> WITH FURTHER DISCUSSION, I AM KIND OF LEANING TOWARDS APPROVING IT LIKE JEFFERSON,

ESTEVEZ IS SAYING. >> THERE'S GOING TO BE A TON OF CONDOS, AND SMALL UNITS THAT PEOPLE CAN BUY.

IT LOOKS LIKE THE PRICE POINT WILL BE THE SAME FOR A 20,000 NEW BUILD INSIDE OF ROWLETT FOR 1 OF THESE, IT'S ALMOST THE SAME PRICE. SO YOU ARE GETTING MORE BANG FOR YOUR BUCK, AND 0 LOT LINISH, PEOPLE LIKE THAT STUFF I AM KIND OF LEANING TOWARDS BEING IN FAVOR OF IT.

>> STEVEN, SHALL I MANY SORRY, ARE IT'S LATE AND I AM TIRED.

>> I THINK THAT DO WE NEED TO VOTE ON THE MOTION THAT'S PUT

OUT? >> WE TO, AND WE WILL WILL, BE I

JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE >> MY COMMENTS AGAIN AS WE LOOK AT IT, IT'S HE -- IT IS PRETTY WELL STATED IN THERE WE DON'T HAVE TO DEVELOP EVERY PIECE OF PROPERTY TODAY IN THE CITY OF ROWLETT. THE CITIZENS HAVEVOKE LICENSED THAT PRETTY -- IN MANY OF OUR PAST MEETINGS.

THIS PROPERTY IS PRETTY MUCH CHALLENGING AND WE JUST HEARD IT EARLIER THAT IT IS CHALLENGING. SO WE REALLY DO NEED TO KIND OF THING THAT -- REALLY TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT OUR CITIZENS ARE ASKING OF US, AND THAT'S REALLY WHAT I'VE GOTTEN.

SO -- >> MR. ENTROP, YES, SIR.

>> I JUST HAD A FEW COMMENTS, AND THE 1 THING THAT IS -- WEIGHS ON MY MIND IS CASITA MEANS A SMALL HOUSE.

AND I KNOW THAT CITIZENS OF ROWLETT WOULD GET A LOT OF PUSH BACK ON MULTIFAMILY, APARTMENTS ESPECIALLY.

YOU AND THIS 1 THEY ARE TRYING TO BUILD SOME SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. I DON'T NECESSARILY THINK THAT I LIKE THE LARGE 2400 SQUARE FOOTAGE.

BUT IT IS GETTING US AWAY FROM MULTIFAMILY, FAMILIAR OF SPECIFICALLY IN THE CITY OF RICHARDSON, AND OTHER PLACES TOO. BUT I KNOW THAT SPECIFICALLY THERE ARE LOTS AND LOTS OF HOUSES AND NEIGHBORHOODS WHERE THE AVERAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THESE LITTLE 3 BEDROOM 1 TO 2 BATH HOUSES IS BETWEEN 11 AND 1300 SQUARE FEET AND THEY ARE IN HUGE HUGE HUGE DEMAND. 1 OF THE HIGHEST -- THEY ARE OLDER HOMES BUILT IN THE 50S AND 60S AND HAVE A HUGE HUGE DEMAND.

I KNOW THAT IN ROWLETT IT IS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO FIND A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME THAT IS UNDER 1500 SQUARE FOOT OR UNDER 16 OR 1700 SQUARE FOOT WITHOUT RESORTING TO A MULTIFAMILY CONDOS OR EVEN APARTMENTS AND SO I REALIZE THAT I AM NOT GIVING A VERY CLEAR -- I HAVEN'T MADE UP MY MIND I AM LEANING TOWARDS NOT BEING IN FAVOR BUT ONLY ON THE ASPECT OF I AM NOT INTERESTED IN

[04:45:01]

IF THEY WANT TO BUILD A 2400 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE, LET'S CALL WHAT IT IS, IT'S A HOUSE.

THOSE ARE MY GENERAL THOUGHTS OF WHERE I AM GOING WITH THIS.

THOSE ARE MY COMMENTS FOR THIS AT THIS MOMENT.

>> JOHN, GO AHEAD. >> CAN I WITHDRAW MY MOTION?

>> ABSOLUTELY. >> BECAUSE IF THAT HEAT CASE ARES ILY COME FORWARD WITH A MOTION TO APPROVE THE FRAMEWORK PLAN WITH THE EXCEPTION OF INCREASING CASITA SIZE TO 24 HOW ABOUT, BUT RATHER LIMIT IT TO 2,000 SQUARE FEET.

>> I WILL SECOND THAT. >> OKAY.

WE'VE GOT- WE HAVE WITHDRAWN THE PRIOR MOTION TO THEY MY, AND MR.

WINTON DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION? >> I AM JUST TRYING TO FIGURE OUT THE OTHER 1 THAT WE HAD A MOTION ON THE TABLE WITH THE

VALID SECOND. >> BUT IT WAS WITHDRAWN.

>> OKAY. I MAY NEED TO STUNNED UNDERSTAND

SOMETHING I MISS UNDERSTAND.PNE. >>

>> MINAIL, DO I NEL, DO I NEED THAT?

>>, I DIDN'T REALIZE COMMISSIONER WINTON, THERE WAS A

SECOND? >> YES.

>> LET'S JUST VOTE ON IT. >> LET'S VOTE ON IT.

SO YOUR ORIGINAL MOTION WAS TO FLATOUT DENY, AND IT WAS

SECONDED BY MR. WINTON, CORRECT. >> RIGHT.

>> SO THIS IS A VOTE, A SHOW OF HAND IS A DENIAL OF THE

FRAMEWORK PLANNISM. >> I THOUGHT THAT WAS WITHDRAWN.

THAT'S WHERE I AM CONFUSED. >> WE HAD TO VOTE IT BECAUSE WE HAD A SECOND MARK. SO WE ARE VOTING ON THE ORIGINAL MOTION. WHICH WAS TO DENY IT, AND THEN

WE CAN COME BACK. >> RIGHT.

>> SO ANYONE IN FAVOR OF DENYING THE FRAMEWORK PLAN PLEASE RAISE

YOUR HAND. >> THAT IS 1, MR. WINTON.

ANYONE OPPOSED TO DENIAL PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.

>> AND THAT IS SEGARS, , ESTEVEZ, ENTROP, ENGEN, AND COTE AND SWIFT. SO THAT 1 DOES NOT CARRY.

>> NOW WE ARE READY FOR A NEW MOTION.

>> GO AHEAD JOHN. >> I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE FRAMEWORK PLAN FOR TOWNHOUSE SINGLE FAMILY USES AND MIXED USE BUILDINGS. THESE CAN TRACTS TOTALING 22.5 ACRES ARES 2005, 2009, 2013. IN THE CITY OF ROWLETT COUNTY TEXAS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF IT WILL THE REQUEST THAT INCREASE THE CASITA SIZE TO 2400 SQUARE FEET RATHER LIMIT IT TO 2,000

SQUARE FEET. >> OKAY.

DO WE HAVE A SECOND BY MR. ENTROP.

>> SO WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR BY MR. COTE, A SECOND BY MR. ENTROP, TO APPROVE THE FRAMEWORK PLAN WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE MINIMUM HOUSE SIZE OF 2400 FEET THIS DOWN TO

2,000 FEET. >> MAXIMUM OF 2,000 SQUARE FEET.

>> MAXIMUM OF 2,000 FEET. >> CORRECT JOHN?

>> YES. >> YES.

>> ALL IN FAVOR OF THIS MOTION PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.

>> WE'VE GOT ESTEVEZ, , ENTROP, ENGEN AND COTE.

SO THAT IS 1, 23, FOUR. ALL OPPOSED TO THE MOTION PLEASE

RAISE YOUR HAND. >> THAT'S EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, WINTON, AND SWIFT. SO THAT MOTION ALSO CARRIES.

[04:50:06]

>> ON BEHALF OF THE TEAM, WE APPRECIATE EVERYONE IN THE

COMMISSION'S SUPPORT. >> THANK YOU FOR A LONG NIGHT.

AND EVERYBODY STAY WARM.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.