[4A. Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation to City Council on a request by James Carroll, on behalf of property owner Arturo Martinez, to: 1) Rezone the subject property from Single-Family Residential (SF-8) to Planned Development (PD) District for Multi-Family Duplex (MF-2F) Uses, and approval of a Concept Plan to construct 13 duplex buildings totaling 26 units; 2) Amend the Comprehensive Plan; and 3) Amend the Zoning Map of the City of Rowlett. The approximately 3.49-acre site is located 230 feet east of the intersection of Miller and Chiesa Roads, situated in the Charles D. Merrell Survey, Abstract Number 957, in the City of Rowlett, Dallas County, Texas.]

AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL ON A REQUEST BY JAMES CARROLL ON BEHALF OF PROPERTY OWNER ARTURO MARTINEZ TO 1, REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM SPLAMENT -- TO CONSTRUCT 13 DUPLEX BUILDINGS, TWO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND 3 AMEND THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF ROWLETT.

THE APPROXIMATELY 3.49 ACRE SITE IS LOCATED 230 EAT OF MILLER AN CHIESA ROADS SITUATED IN THE CHARLES MERRELL SURVEY IN THE

CITY OF ROWLETT. >> MADAME CHAIR COMMISSIONERS THANK YOU FOR HAVING US THIS EVENING.

SUSAN POP THAT UP ON THE SCREEN FOR ME.

EXCELLENT. THANK YOU.

THE CLICKER IS WORKING. IT IS NOT.

MADAME CHAIR COMMISSIONERS THANK YOU.

AS JUST READ WE ARE TO DISCUSS A REZONING REQUEST A 3.49 ACRE SITE ZONED SF-8 TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR 13 LOT TWO FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, SUSAN.

I WANTED TO START OFF THIS EVENING REMIND YOU INTENT OF DISTRICTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT CODE PER SECTION OF THE CODE

[00:05:05]

INTENDED TO COMPLEMENT STANDARDS AN USES THAT IMPLEMENT A HIGHER QUALITY WITH STANDARD DISTRICTS. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION THIS SITE UNDEVELOPED BETWEEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TODAY EAST AS WELL AS MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEXES AND VACANT PROPERTY DEVELOPED IN '88 AND '82.

THE PROPOSAL REFLECT VARIANCES FROM THE PROPOSED BASE DISTRICT OF FM-2 F. ACCESS IS PROPOSED FROM ONE POINT ALONG MILLER ROAD WHICH IS CURRENTLY A TWO LANE UNDIVIDED AT FAULT THOROUGHFARE. THIS STREET DOES TERMINATE IN A CUL DE SAC THAT MEETS OUR FIRED ROAD TURNAROUND REQUIREMENTS.

MILLER VOTED IN THE CURRENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN IN DESIGN TO FULL BLOWN SIX LANE DIVIDED CONCRETE ROAD SO QUITE AN IMPROVEMENT AS WELL AS A SLIGHT INCREASE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH, A FULL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OR TIA WOULD BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED BY US DURING THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PHASE SHOULD THIS BE APPROVED TO DETERMINE IF THERE WAS H WERE IMMEDIATE IMPROVEMENTS TO MILLER ROAD WE NEED TO SEE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE SUSAN.

USE OF THE PROPERTY CURRENT ZONING WE TOUCHED A LITTLE BIT BUT IT IS ZONED SF-8 DISTRICT WHICH IS INTENDED TO ACCOMMODATE FIRST AN FOREMOST THE SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT OF 8,000 CUELLAR FOOD LOTS MUNICIPAL USES LINES LIST PLAYGROUNDS AS WELL AS PRIMARY OR SECONDARY SCHOOLS.

SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES UNDER THIS DISTRICT ARE REQUIRED TO BE A MINIMUM 1800 SQUARE FEET PER THE ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE.

NEXT SLIDE. AS WITH ALL REZONINGS WE LOOK AT THE SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN THAT IS LARGELY RESIDENTIAL MIX OF USES AROUND THIS PROPERTY ACROSS MILLION TORE THE NORTH THERE ARE RELIGIOUS SELL BLISS ZONED FOR RESIDENTIAL USE, EAST OF COURSE AS WE'VETER IS HER FORTH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, WHICH HAS THE SOUTH ALSO DEVELOPED WITH TWO FAMILY OR DUPLEX STYLE DEVELOPMENT AND TO THE WEST THERE ARE UNDEVELOPED PARCELS THAT ARE FROM TOP TO BOTTOM A C-1 DISTRICT MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICT AS WELL AS THE DEVELOPED MULTI-FAMILY USES THAT SHARES THE MFS OR MULTI-FAMILY ZONING DISTRICT.

WE CONDUCTED OUR COMPATABILITY ANALYSIS AND TAKEN A LOOK AT THE IMMEDIATE DUPLEX UNIKNITS A HUNDRED FEET AS IS OUR NOTICING RIRPTS WE FIND IS A FAIR DISTANCE.

YOU'LL SEE THAT REFLECTED IN THE TABLE.

IT IS DEVELOPED UNDER THE 1983 ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT COPED REQUIREMENTS. I POINT OUT DIFFERENCES THIS PROPOSAL IS INCREASING THE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH PER THE ZONING STANDARD OF THAT NEIGHBORING DEVELOPMENT HOWEVER IS A DECREASE IN THE MINIMUM LOT DEPTH AND SLIGHT DECREASE IN THE UNIT AREA BUT AS SAID IN THE PAST THE BUILT IN DOES DIFFER FROM THE MINIMUM, THE 25 DEVELOPED TWO FAMILY PROPERTIES WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SITE HAVE AN AVERAGE LOT SIZE OF APPROXIMATELY JUST OVER 7600 SQUARE FEET IN AVERAGE DWELLING UNITS SIZE APPROXIMATELY 1200 SQUARE FEET SO THAT'S EXCESS OF ZONING MINIMUMS. BASED ON THE LOT THE LAIGSZ PROVIDED FOR THE APPLICANT THIS SITE WHILE THE MINIMUM LOT AREA IS 6800 SQUARE FEET WE ARE LIKELY GOING TO BE LOOKING AT AN AVERAGE OF OVER A THOUSAND SQUARE FEET.

NEXT SLIDE. OF COURSE WITH REZONING WE LOCK TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR DIRECTION.

THE SUBJECT IS SITE THAT IS A SPLIT CAPACITY CASE BETWEEN THE RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES ON MILLER ROAD IN RED AS WELL AS SOUTH OF THE SITE IN ORANGE THE PROPOSED ZONING CLASSIFICATION TD DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE RETAME COMPONENT ON MILLER ROAD.

NEITHER DOES THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF SF-8 GIVEN THE SAITSZ RESTRICT BETWEEN TWO ESTABLISHED ENTITIES BEING THE SCHOOL AND MULTI-FAMILY COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IS

[00:10:01]

UNLIKELY TO BE SUCCESSFUL AS STAND ALONE SITE UNLESS THIS PROPERTY WERE TO COMBINE WITH ADJACENT COMMERCIAL PARCELS.

THE USE THAT IS THE PD WON'T HAVE THE NEGATIVE IMPACT ON NON-RESIDENTIAL USES TO THE NORTH OR COMMERCIALLY DESIGNATED PROPERTY TO THE WEST. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

IN RELATION TO THAT MEDIAN DENSITY COMPONENT THE CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT OF SF-8 DOES NOT MEET THIS DESIGNATION OF THE COMP PLAN, MEDIAN RESIDENCY LOTS UNDER 7,000 SQUARE FEET THE EXCESS DISTRICT WOULD FAMED UNDER THE LOW DENSITY CATEGORY.

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAS LOTS MINIMUM 6800 SQUARE FEET, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DEFINES MEDIUM DENSITY AS PRIMARILY SINGLE-FAMILY NOT TWO FAMILY DEVELOPMENT BUT THE CONCEPT IS MUTE ON TWO FAMILY. THE RDC ITSELF DOES OFTEN PAIR TWO FAMILY ON DUPLEX USES WITH SINGLE FAMILY USES IN TERMS OF STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT SO THEY ARE CONSIDERED COMPARABLE.

THEREFORE WE ARE COMFORTABLE REQUESTING THE FORM DOES CONFORM TO MEDIUM DESIGNATION FOR THE REAR OF THE FAMILY THOUGH NOT STRAIGHT SINGLE-FAMILY. INTO THE ACTUAL SITE DESIGN PD CONTRIBUTIONS FOR THE CONCEPT PLAN, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A BASE ZONING DISTRICT OF FF-2 F ALIGNED WITH THE LOT THEY'RE ATTEMPT HERE. 26 TOTAL TO A LOT THERE.

ARE TWO COMMON AREA LOTS ON MILLER ROAD THAT WILL LARGELY BE RESERVED FOR ENTRY WAY FEATURES MANY MINIMUM LOT IS 6800 SQUARE FEET WITH MINIMUM UNIT 900 SQUARE FEET.

STRAIGHT TWO CAR GARAGES FRONT ENTRY.

HONING IN ON OPEN SPACES THE CONCEPT PLAN DOES REFLECT TWO ON MILLER ROAD. THEY SERVE AS ENTRYWAY FEATURES.

THEY TOTAL 7,000 SQUARE FEET COMBINED.

THE APPLICANT IS NOT PROPOSING ACTIVE OPEN SPACE SO ASIDE FROM THESE PASSIVE OR ENTRY WAY FEATURE SPACES WITH THE SITE AS A LIMITATION TO FINDING MORE AREA ESSENTIALLY TO PROVIDE FOR THOSE IT'S WORTH NOTING THAT SECTION 77503 OF THE RDC REQUIRES ACTIVE OPEN SPACE ON DEVELOPMENTS OF 25 LOTS OR MORE SO IT'S ACTUALLY NOT A REQUIREMENT FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

DISCUSSING SCREENING THE CONCEPT PLAN DOES REFLECT A 6 FOOT MASONRY WALL PRACTICALLY ON ALL SIDES EAST WEST AN SOUTH PROPERTY LINES AS WELL AS COMPONENTS IN THE ENTRYWAY FEATURES ON MILLER ROAD. THE HOA WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THESE WALLS AN APPROPRIATE EASEMENTS FOR THAT DEDICATED AT TIME OF FINAL PLALT SHOULD THIS BE APPROVED.

NEXT SLIDE. MOVING INTO THE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS I KNOW THIS IS A HEAVY SLIDE.

LET'S FOCUS ON THE LAST TWO COLUMNS.

THE DISCREPANCIES DECREASE IN MINIMUM LOT SIZE FROM THE BASE ZONING DISTRICT TO THIS PD AS WELL AS THE LOT DEPTH.

I WANT TO POINT OUT A DECREASE IN THE FRONT AND REAR SETBACKS AND I'LL MOVE INTO THOSE THE NEXT SLIDES.

IT'S WORTH NOTING THAT STANDARDS NOT SPECIFIED IN THIS PD ARE GOING TO BE EXPECTED TO BE IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE MF-2 F ZONING DISTRICT. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE FOLLOWING DEFENSIVE UNITED NATIONS FROM THE MF-K2 TS F DISTRICTS THEY'RE LOOKING TO ELIMINATE THE ALLEY REQUIREMENTS AND FRONT LOOKING TO REDUCE THE PRIMARY ENTRYWAY LANDSCAPING FROM 9600 TO 7 TOWN. THEY'RE LOOKING TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE FROM 8500 SQUARE FEET TO 6800 AS WELL AS REDUCING THE MINIMUM DEPTH TO 7 A FEET AND THEY'RE LOOKING TO DECREASE THE MINIMUM FRONT YARD AND REAR YARD SET BACKS 25 FEET 20 FEET FOR THE FRONT 25 TO 15 ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL USES IN THE REAR. WLIM NATING THE ALLEY REQUIREMENT ALICE ARE MOSTLY INTENDED TO ACCOMMODATE UTILITY

[00:15:04]

PLACEMENT ALLOW FOR TRASH PICKUP PROVIDE PARKING ALTERNATIVES THAT WE CAN OPEN THE STREET A LITTLE BIT AS WELL AS ENCOURAGE PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY ALONG THE STREET WHEN FRONT ENTRY PRODUCTS ARE ALLOWED TYPICALLY THE LRJ HOOK IS REQUIRED AND WHEN A FOUR-FOOT RECESS IS REQUIRED TO PREVENT THE FIST CAT OBSTRUCTION OF VEHICLES ON THE STREET. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING AN ALLEY WAIVER IN ALL 13 LOTS.

TYPICALLY AL LIST WITHIN 15 FOOT RIGHTS OF WAY.

TWO ADDITIONAL ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS PROPERTY WOULD FURTHER REDUCE DEVELOPABILITY PARTICULARLY TAKEING INTO ACCOUNT LOT WIDTH AND CENTRAL RIGHT OF WAY 60 FEET.

THE APPLICANT IS EXCEEDSING THE 4 FOOT GARAGE RECESS PROVIDING 5 FEET TO THE FRONT IN ADDITION TO THE 20 FOOT FRONT SET BACK.

YOU CAN SEE ON EXAMPLE THAT 25 FEET CALLED OUT WILL SERVE AS EXTENSION OF THE DRIVEWAY WHICH WILL ALLOW FOR DEEPER PARKING AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE SIDEWALK AN RIGHT OF WAY AREA.

THE APPLICANT IS LOOKING TO REDUCE THE PRIMARY ENTRYWAY AREA FROM 9600 FEET TO 7,000, 3500 SQUARE FEET PER SIDE.

REQUIREMENTS REFLECTED ON SCREEN.

BASE DIMENSION IN RED AS WELL AS 1600 SQUARE FOOT PER SIDE THAT I'VE ILLUSTRATED THERE. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A REDUCTION IN THOSE DIMENSIONS FROM 80 FOOT DEATHS TO 45 FEET AND REDUCTION IN THE 7,000 TOTAL REDUCING LOTS DOWNSTREAM AS JUSTIFICATION. AT STAFFES CONSENSUS THE PROVIDED ENTRY FEATURES DO MEET THE INTENT OF ENTRY FEATURE WHILE NOT BEING UNIT CAL HOWEVER IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT FURTHER LANDSCAPING TREATMENT SUCH AS FURTHER PLANTINGS OR HARD ESCAPE BE ADDED TO GET TO US THAT HIGHER QUALITY DEVELOPMENT AND IN ORANGE THAT BOTTOM PHOTO THERE SORT OF A REFLECTION OF WHAT A ENTRYWAY FEET WWOR LOOK LIKE IF IT WERE TO MEET OUR REQUIREMENTS. CAN YOU SEE IT FAR EXCEEDS INTO THAT ADJACENT LOT FROM WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING IN GREEN.

I LUMP TOGETHER THE PROPOSED REDUCTION IN MINIMUM LOT SIZE AND DEPTH, 8500 SQUARE FEET TO 6800 SQUARE FEET IN LOT SIZE AND 1120 IN DEPTH TO 7 A FEET IN DEPTH.

APPLICANT IS LOOKING TO DECREASE THE PRESCRIBED SITE CONDITIONS AS WELL AS THE MINIMUM RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH THE APPLICANT IS COMPLYING WITH AS LIMITING FACTORS.

SUBJECT SITE IS LOCATED BETWEEN TWO SITES EAST AN WEST.

THEREFORE ACQUISITION OF FURTHER PROPERTY TO MEET THESE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS UNLIKELY. THE APPLICANT HAS ELECTED TO DIVIDE THE REMAINING PROPERTY EVENLY BOTH SIDES OF 60 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY WAS AN ALTERNATIVE SINGLE LOADED SIDE STREET IS NOT THE WISES IN TERMS OF A EFFICIENT DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT RESULT IN A STRETCH OF STREET THAT IS ONLY SERVICED BY A FEW NUMBER OF LOTS. THE APPLICANT HAS CHOSEN LOTS TO MENTION INCLUDING THE WIDTH DEPTH AND AREA TO MAXIMIZE THE YARD SPACE LINING CLOSE TO THE BASE AS POSSIBLE.

AGAIN I LUMPED THESE TWO DEFENSIVE UNITED NATIONS TOGETHER THE MINIMUM FRONT YARD SET BACK 25 TO 20 FEET AS WELL AS MINIMUM REAR 25 TO IDENTIFY 15 FEET.

THE APPLICANT SITE THE EXISTING NARROW SITE DEPTH AND WIDTH AS LIMITING FACTORS. APPLICANT HAS EXCEEDED THE GARAGE RECESS AS WE DISCUSSED IN ORDER TO MIDGATE FURTHER REDUCED FRONT YARD THERE. DOES MEET THE INTENT TO PROVIDE FOR VEHICLE AN PEMD MANEUVERING WHILE MAINTAINING A REASONABLE

[00:20:02]

FRONT AND REAR YARD DEPTH. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE 15 FOOT REAR YARD ADJACENT TO THE MULTI-FAMILY COMPLEX TO THE WEST REDUCE FROM 25 TO 15 FEET THAT IS ADJACENT TECHNICALLY TO RESIDENTIAL USE THOUGH IT'S MULTI-FAMILY SO WE WOULD ASSESS 25 FEET THAT SITUATION AND THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING 6 FOOT MASONRY TO MITIGATE FOR THAT REDUCED REAR YARD SET BACK.

NEXT SLIDE. RESILIENT NEIGHBORHOODS THE COMP PLAN DOES DISCUSS RESILIENT NEIGHBORHOODS AS FOCUSING ON A MIX OF HOUSING TYPES TO CREATE A COMPLETE NEIGHBORHOOD.

FLEXIBLE LOT SHAPES CONSIDERATION WILL AND DID I EVERTY TO THE COMMUNITY AND ATTRACT A WIDER BASE OF RESIDENTS RESILIENT NEIGHBORHOODS TYPICALLY PROVIDE MENTAL AND SENSE OF PLACES AND BELONGING.

THE PROPOSED CONCEPT PLAN AND ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA ARE GENERATED FROM PRESCRIBED SITE WIDTH THAT AGAIN BETWEEN TWO DEVELOPED SITES AS SUCH THE REQUESTED DEFENSIVE UNITED NATIONS FROM THE BASE ZONING DISTRICT OF THE MF-2F ARE TO ACCOMMODATE EFFICIENT USE OF PROPERTY ALIGNING TO REQUIREMENTS CLOSELY AS POSSIBLE.

THIS IS A VIEW FROM MILLER ROAD NORTH LOOKING SOUTH, HER FIRTH ELEMENTARY ON THE LEFT MULTI-FAMILY ON THE RIGHT.

MAILED TO PROPERTY OWN WITHIN 200 TO 500 FEET, WE HAVE RECEIVED ONE IN OPPOSITION FROM THE 200 FOOT AREA AND TWO IN OPPOSITION FROM THE 500 FOOT COURTESY NOTICE AREA.

YOU SEE THOSE ON THE SCREEN THERE.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE. WITH THAT I COME TO STAFF RECOMMENDATION. IT IS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM SINGLE-FAMILY PROPERTY TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AS PRESENTED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS THAT FURTHER LANDSCAPE AND HARD ESCAPE TREATMENT BE USED IN THE OPEN SPACE LOTS TO GET TO US THAT HIGHER QUALITY DEVELOPMENT.

GETTING US TO THAT HIGHER QUALITY STANDARD THE PROPOSED STANDARDS ARE IN RESPONSE TO NARROW SITE ARE YOUING FROM BUDDING DEVELOPMENT AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE MINIMAL IMPACT ON SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT WITH AMAZE HENRI ONE POINT OF INGRESS AN EGRESS TO SERVE 26 INDIVIDUAL UNITS ON 13 LOTS. LASTLY I END WITH THE PROPOSED TWO FAMILY LOT TYPE WILL EXPAND ON AN UNDER SERVED HOUSING TYPE IN THE CITY THE COMP PLAN DOES CALL OUT A 10TH PER CENTS OF THE CITYES ACTIVELY DEVELOPED WITH A TWO FAMILY USE.

SO WE FEEL THAT IT WILL EXPAND ON THAT.

WITH THAT I WILL DO MY BEST TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THE APPLICANT MR. CARROLL IS HERE. HE'S AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.

>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COMMISSIONERS ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? YES, SIR.

>> LOOKING AT THE PAGE 7 I GUESS THE PDF YOU MENTION THE MILLER

ROAD IS GOING TO BE SIX LANES. >> YES, SIR.

>> WILL THAT IMPACT THE HARDSCAPE OF THIS DEVELOPMENT?

>> WE HAVE DISCUSSED IN THE OFFICE THE TIMING OF THOSE INTERSECTING PROJECTS. I DON'T KNOW IF JEFF IS STANDING. HE MIGHT BE BETTER EQUIPPED TO

ANSWER THAT THAN I AM. >> THANK YOU COMMISSIONER.

MADAME CHAIR. I'M SORRY COMMISSIONER.

YOU SAID WOULD THE EXPANSION OF MILLER ROAD IMPACT THE

HARDSCAPES OF THE DEVELOPMENT? >> ON THE PROPOSED ENTRYWAY WILL THAT GO AWAY. WILL WE LOSE ANY MORE THAN IS

BEING PROPOSED THERE? >> I APOLOGIZE.

>> NO WORRIES, I WASN'T CLEAR. >> WE HAVE A LOT OF THAT 7,000 COMBINED SQUARE FEET AFTER THE RIGHT OF WAY.

>> I WAS TRYING TO FIND AND COULDN'T.

THANK YOU. >> ANY OTHER QUESTION FOR STAFF?

[00:25:03]

HAS THE ELECT GOT A PRESENTATION?

>> YES, I HAVE A PRESENTATION AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.

>> COMMISSIONERS ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? WOULD YOU LIKE TO BRING THE APPLICANT UP? YES. IF YOU'LL COME UP AND GIVE US HIS NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

>> GOOD EVENING CHAIRPERSON, MEMBERS, JAMES CARROLL, P.O. BOX 11, LE UPON TEXAS CARROLL CONSULTING GROUP.

QUEST Y'ALL HAVE I'LL BE HAPPY TO TRY TO ANSWER THEM FOR.

>> COMMISSIONERS. >> YES, SIR.

SEGARS. >> I WAS CURIOUS THERE'S NOT A LOT OF COMPS IN ROWLETT FOR DUPLEXES.

WHAT WAS YOUR PRICE POINT THAT Y'ALL ARE THINKING ABOUT?

>> I REALLY DON'T KNOW AT THIS STAGE OF THE GAME WITH THE COST

OF THINGS. >> ALWAYS CHANGING.

>> IT'S VERY DIFFICULT TO PREDICT SOMETHING IN THE FUTURE, YOU KNOW JUST WITH THE PRICING INCREASES BUT THESE ARE GOING TO BE FAIRLY SUBSTANTIAL HOUSES, SO YOU KNOW, WE ARE PROBABLY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF 400-450,000 FOR A DUPLEX UNIT.

IT'S GOING TO BE I THINK BUILD CLOSE TO 1200 SQUARE FEET PER

UNI-IT. >> OKAY.

>> ABOVE THE ACTUAL 900 REQUIRED.

THEY'RE GOING TO BUILD THREE-BEDROOM TWO BATH.

>> LOA. >> YES, THAT WILL BE IN THERE,

YES. >> OKAY THANK YOU.

>> GENTLEMEN, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT?

>> THANK YOU. OKAY, THANK YOU.

WELL, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING SO AT THIS TIME WE WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I HAVE ONE SPEAKER CARD HERE FOR STEPHEN HIGGINS. I'M SORRY.

STEPHANIE. I CAN'T READ VERY WELL.

>> MY NAME IS STEPHANIE HIGGINS, I LIVE AT 4021 CHIESA ROAD.

I LIKE THAT WE ARE GETTING SOME MORE DEVELOPMENTS N. HOWEVER I THINK THAT WE ARE GROWING ENTIRELY TOO QUICKLY AND THE INFRASTRUCTURE IS LACKING. FOR EXAMPLE WHEN BAY SIDE WAS BUILT WE DIDN'T TAKE ANY TIME TO PLAN OUT THE SEWAGE ISSUE THAT WAS HAPPENING SO FOR OVER A YEAR I GOT TO SMELL THE WONDERFUL SMELL OF PIPE AT MY HOUSE UNTIL IT GOT REROUTED DOWN MILLER ROAD AND WE ARE ABOUT TO HAVE 109 UNITS AT CANTERBURY COVE, A TOTAL 135 NEW I'M IT IS COMING IN.

ARE WE SUPPORTING THAT ON THE INFRASTRUCTURE? AM I GOING TO BE SMELLING MORE POOP AS MY HOUSE? IS THAT GOING TO BE DONE BEFORE MILLER ROAD? ARE WE GETTING ALL THE PLANNING DONE TO SUPPORT ALL THE PEOPLE COMING IN THE TRUCKS THERE? WITH LACK OF OVERSIGHT WITH INSPECTIONS, WE'VE HAD TWO FIRES HAPPEN AT THE SENIOR MULTI-FAMILIPLEX ON CHIESA. IS IN A LACK OF INSPECTIONS THAT WE ARE HAVING FIRE AT A SENIOR CITIZEN PLACE OF ALL PLACES? YOU KNOW, I THINK THE DREAM IS THERE.

IT'S JUST THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THE CITY. I FEEL LIKE IT'S LACKING.

WE DON'T EVEN HAVE SIDEWALKS. THEY'RE WANTING TO TALK ABOUT SPECIFICALLY SAID ENCOURAGE PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY ON THE STREET. WE DON'T EVEN HAVE SIDEWALKS.

KIDS ARE WALKING IN TALL GRASS WET UP TO THEIR KNEES.

WE DON'T HAVE SIDEWALKS. GOING THE REST WAIFTD DOWN MILLER IT'S LIKE PIECE BY PIECE OF SIDEWALKS THERE.

ARE NO SIDEWALKS. THERE ARE ISSUES I HAVE AND I WOULD LIKE Y'ALL TO PLEASE PUT THE INFRASTRUCTURE IN PLACE BEFORE WE GET ALL THESE UNITS AND ALL THESE PEOPLE HERE AND ALL THIS TRAFFIC TO SUPPORT IT BECAUSE IT IS HURTING ALL THE OTHER CITIZENS THAT ARE HERE. WE ARE HAVING TO USE THAT ROAD CONSTANTLY AND IT'S ALREADY TRASH.

IT'S JUST AS BAD AS TOLLOR ROAD. WE ARE GOING TO HAVE BUSES COME THROUGH THE MILLER ROAD BRIDGE RIGHT NOW.

IF A BUS WERE TO GO OVER THAT BRIDGE THE RAILING ON THAT BRIDGE ALONE IS NOT UP TO CODE TO EVEN SUPPORT A BUS GOING OVER IT. IT IS WAY LOW.

SO THERE'S A LOT OF ISSUES WITH INFRASTRUCTURE.

THERE'S A LOT OF PROBLEM WITH SEWAGE AND THINGS LIKE THAT THAT NEED TO BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION AN PUT IN PLACE BEFORE WE ADD IN ALL THESE UNITS AND ALL THIS TRAFFIC IN OUR CITY. THAT'S ALL I'VE GOT.

>> THANK YOU. THAT'S THE ONLY SPEAKER CARD I

[00:30:04]

HAVE. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS TIE TELL? -- ITEM? I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. COMMISSIONERS, ANY DISCUSSION? I'M SORRY. SUSAN, LET ME REOPEN THIS ONE.

SUSAN HAS TWO COMMENTS TO READ INTO THE RECORDS.

I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD, SUSAN.

>> REGARDING ITEM 4-ASF-8 TO MF 2F.

I DO NOT LIVE WITHIN THE 500 FOOT NOTIFICATION AREA.

>> SUSAN. >> WE CAN'T HEAR YOU.

>> SORRY. CAN YOU NOW? OKAY. I DO NOT LIVE WITHIN THE 500 FOOT NOTIFICATION AREA BUT THE MILLER CHIESA INTERSECTION IS PART OF MY EVERYDAY LIFE AS I TRAVEL THAT WAY FREQUENTLY SO I WOULD LIKE TO GIVE MY INPUT. SEVERAL YEARS AGO ROWLETT HOUSING OPTIONS WERE LIMITED TO MOST SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.

THE CITY DECIDED MORE CHOICE WAS NEEDED SINCE THE MULTIPLICITY HIGH DENSITY HOUSING IS CREATING TRAFFIC CONGESTION.

GRANTED FEW OF THOSE WERE FOR DUPLEXES AN DUPLEXES WILL HAVE LESS NEGATIVE IMPACT THAT CAN BE MADE TO BE AS ATTRACTIVE AS SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. I'M NOT SPEAKING SO MUCH AGAINST THE REZONING AS THE VARIANCES REQUESTED.

ONE HAS TO WONDER WHY WE HAVE ZONING RESTRICTIONS IF WE ALLOW DEVELOP DOORS -- RATHER THAN GIVING THEM CHOICE IN THAT MATTER AND FORCING MANY OF THEM TO PUT IN OPEN SPACES TRAILS AN SUCH WHICH SERVE WHICH THOSE RESIDENTS HAVE TO PAY RATHER THAN THE CITY MAINTAINING THEM. ACCORDING TO THE PACKET INFORMATION IN ADDITION TO REDUCING THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT FOR ALICE OR L.J. HOOK DRIVEWAYS DESPITE THE STATED INTENT AN SIGNIFICANT BENEFITS OF THOSE REQUIREMENTS.

AGAIN WHY DO WE HAVE THE STANDARDS IF WE ARE NOT GOING TO UP HOLD THEM. I WOULD HAVE LESS CONCERN IF THE PLAN WAS TO BUILD LARGER DUPLEX HOMES ON SMALLER LOTS WITH NO ALICE NO FRONT DRIVEWAYS. STAFF STATES IT SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION HOWEVER THAT THE CURRENT ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF SF-8 DOES NOT CURRENTLY FULFILL IN DESIGNATION. IT WOULD SEEM TO MAKE MORE SENSE THAN IF A ZONING CHANGE IS TO BE MADE TO DO SO IN FULFILLMENT OF THE GOALS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

THOSE IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND MANY IN OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS SURROUNDING THE MILLER CHIESA INTERSECTION WOULD PREFER TO HAVE RETAIL OUTLETS IN EASY REACH RATHER THAN SMALL DID YOU APPLICATIONS. I HOPE PNZ AND THE COUNCIL IF THEY APPROVE IN REQUEST REQUIRE CONFORMITY WITH THE ZONING DISTRICT. THANKS FOR TAKING MY COMMENTS INTO CONSIDERATION. DEB SHINDER.

THAT IS FROM TOM AS SHINDER. I LIVE A MILE FROM THE PROPOSED DUPLEX DEVELOPMENT. I'M OPPOSED TO THE APPROVAL OF SMALL MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING UNIKNITS THE AREA.

THE APPLICANT WANTS VARIANTS FOR LOT SIZE SETS BACK ALLEYS AND SO FORTH. I THINK THAT WILL LOWER PROPERTY VALUES IN NEARBY LARGER HOMES. I KNOW THAT DUPLEXES OFTEN TURN TO RENTALS WHICH LEADS TO LESS UP KEEP.

I DON'T THINK THIS IS APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT TO BE NEXT DOOR TO MILLER. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATED THE AREA TO HAVE RETAIL AN OFFICE IN THIS AREA AND I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE CITY STICK WITH THAT.

WE NEED SHOPS HAPPEN OFFICE SPACE MORE THAN A DEVELOPMENT THAT COMPLIES WITH THE ZONING. WE DON'T NEED TO GRANT THIS MANY

[00:35:04]

VARIANCES. LET'S EITHER CHANGE THE ZONING ORDINANCE OR ABIDE BY THE RESTRICTION.

I DON'T SEE A GELG REASON IN THIS CASE.

IT WILL COST TOO MUCH TO MEET THE STANDARDS IS AN INADEQUATE REASON BECAUSE IF THEY CAN'T DO IT SO CODE THERE IS A CHANCE

SOMEONE ELSE CAN. >> IS THAT IT SUSAN? NOW LET'S GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMISSIONERS, ANY DISCUSSION, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR THE APPLICANT? ONE STAFF QUESTION.

>> HOW MUCH ACREAGE IS LEFT ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPOSED PROPERTY FOR MAYBE COMMERCIAL IN THE FUTURE?

>> SO IF COMMERCIAL COMPONENT UP TOP IS NOTHING SUBSTANTIAL.

THAT IS ABOUT 260 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION AND IT'S ROUGHLY SQUARE SO WE CAN TAKE 260 BY 260ISH IS GENERALLY THE COMMERCIAL AREA THERE. WAS A RECENT REQUEST TO REDUCE SETBACKS WITH THE POTENTIAL SITE.

WE HAVE NO ACTIVE APPLICATION OF THAT HOWEVER.

>> DO YOU HAVE AN IDEA ON THE ACREAGE.

>> I DO NOT. I'M SORRY.

>> OKAY. ROUGHLY 67,000 SQUARE FEET.

>> THAT'S ABOUT 1.55 ACRES. >> THAT'S WHY I WAS CURIOUS.

TYPICAL GAS STATION IF YOU WANTED TO HAVE AN IDEA REQUIRES

ABOUT TWO ACRES. >> THANK YOU.

>> QUICK TRIP. THOSE ARE USUALLY THE ONES THAT

ARE BUILDING. >> GENTLEMEN, ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ANY DISCUSSION?

GO AHEAD, SIR. >> I KIND OF LIKE THE CONCEPT AS FAR AS REZONING I. I CAN SEE THAT WOULD BE A FAVORABLE CHANGE BECAUSE IF WE DON'T YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A SECTION OF RESIDENTIAL THAT'S LAND LOCKED BEHIND RESIDENTIAL.

THIS IS PROBABLY A VERY GOOD USE OF THIS LAND BUT I'M NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED LAYOUT. I THINK THAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR TOO MANY VARIANCES. WE HAVE THE REQUIREMENTS HERE FOR A REASON AND WE SHOULD FOLLOW.

I THINK IF THIS WAS AN 11 UNIT, 11 BUILDIN, 22 UNIT LAYOUT, YOU'D BE ABLE TO GET SOME L HOOK GARAGES AND PROBABLY HAVE AN IMPROVED DEVELOPMENT. I DON'T THINK PUTING TWO OR THREE BUSHES IN THE FRONT CONSTITUTES OR SATISFIES THE INTENT OF THE LAND IN DEVELOPMENT TO GIVE A BETTER LAYOUT. SO I WILL NOT BE IN FAVOR, OR I

WILL NOT BE VOTING YES ON THIS. >> YEAH, I USUALLY DON'T LIKE DUPLEXES FOR MANY REASONS, THE DIFFERENT COLORS IN ROOFS THAT CAN HAPPEN OVER TIME, THE CHANGES IN LANDSCAPING, IT CAN BECOME A LARGE RENT MARKED WHICH I HAVE NO ISSUE WITH ON THE RECORD, JUST THE CARE OF THE PROPERTY OVER TIME HAS ALWAYS BEEN MY CONCERN IS THE FUTURE AN NOT EXACTLY THE IMMEDIATE HOW P FIRST FIVE YEARS. H.O.A. MAKES ME FEEL BETTER.

I WISH COULD I SEE SOME RENDERINGS AND GET SOME VISUAL IDEA WHAT IT'S GOING TO LOOK LIKE.

I THINK THE PUBLIC WOULD LIKE TO SEE SOME VISUAL.

I WOULD NOT HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT'S NOT A HUGE PROPERTY YOU KNOW, SO YOU CAN ONLY DO SO MUCH WITNESS.

YOU GOT MULTI-FAMILY, I GOT A SCHOOL.

IT MAKES SENSE TO ME. TWO LIKE TO SEE A BETTER PRESENTATION AND I THINK CITY COUNCIL PROBABLY WANTS TO SEE

THAT TOO SO I'M GOING TO SAY NO. >> OKAY.

MR. SWIFT, ANY COMMENTS? >> I THINK I'M GOING TO TEND TO

[00:40:05]

AGREE. WHEN I FIRST SAW DUPLEX I WAS A LITTLE TURNED OFF. HOWEVER AFTER STUDYING THE SITE A LITTLE BUILT, I THINK I AGREE IT'S PROBABLY A GOOD PLAN FOR THIS TRACT. I THINK I TEND TO AGREE WITH MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS HERE THAT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE MORE OF AN UPSCALE TYPE LOOK WITH SOME J HOOKS OR L SHAPE ENTRIES IN THERE AND POSSIBLY LIKE JOHN SAID REDUCE LOT COUNT, WOULDN'T HAVE TO BE A LOT TO MAKE THE DEVELOPMENT A LITTLE BIT MORE AESTHETICLY PLEASING SO I PROBABLY WILL NOT BE SUPPORTING IT EITHER. ROBERT, ANYTHING FROM YOU?

>> ANY OTHER COMMENTS? AT THIS TIME I'M READY FOR A MOTION. MR. COTE.

>> I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO DISAPPROVE THE REQUEST FOR

ZONING CHANGE. >> WE HAVE A MOTION FOR DENIAL FROM MR. COTE. DO I HAVE A SECOND?

>> I'LL SECOND THAT. >> WE HAVE A SECOND FROM MR. SEGARS. EVERYONE, LET'S VOTE AND THIS WOULD BE FOR DENIAL OF THIS ITEM ON THE AGENDA.

AND THAT PASSED UNANIMOUSLY, SO THIS ONE WAS DENIED.

[4B. Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation to City Council on a request by property owner Candace Edwards, regarding a Special Use Permit to allow for a massage establishment license on a portion of property zoned Planned Development (PD) District for Limited Commercial/ Retail (C-1) Uses. The approximately 2.66-acre site is located at 8200 Liberty Grove Road, being a portion of the Lake Valley Estates Phase 2 Subdivision, approximately 760 feet southwest of the intersection of Chiesa and Liberty Grove Roads, in the City of Rowlett, Dallas County, Texas.]

MOVING ON TO 4B CONDUCTING PUBLIC HEARING MAKE REJTS TO CITY COUNCIL BY PROPERTY OWNER CANDACE EDWARDS REGARDING SPECIAL USE ALLOWING FOR MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT FOR LIMITED COMMERCIAL RETAIL C-1 USES, THE APPROX APPROXIMATELY ACRE SITE

[READING]. >> THANK YOU MADAME CHAIR AND THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS. SO THE ITEM I'LL BE PRESENTING FOR THE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE GECHL H DEVELOPMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 750 SQUARE FOOT, I'M SORRY, THIS IS THE WRONG PRESENTATION.

I SAW RESTAURANT. I WAS LIKE WHAT?

>> OKAY, THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS.

THE ITEM I'LL BE PRESENTING ON FOR THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE APPROVAL SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE ON A PROPERTY ZONED PLAN DEVELOPMENT FOR LIMITED COMMERCIAL RETAIL USES. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND ON THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AS WELL AS THE BUSINESS. ON NOVEMBER 15TH, 2016 THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED ORDINANCE 4516 WHICH ALLOWED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMERCIAL OFFICE CENTER WITH FOUR BUILDINGS AND SO, HALO SALON THE BUSINESS WAS GRANTED A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IN OCTOBER 2019.

WITH THE APPROVAL OF SALON USES. SHOULD THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED THE APPLICANT WILL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALL CITY OF ROWLETT ORDINANCES . . . AS WELL AS ALL OF STATE REQUIREMENTS.

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS 475 FEET OF FRONT DAMAGE ON LIBERTY GROVE AND ABOUT 200 FEET IN LOT DEPTH THERE.

ARE EXISTING LANDSCAPE TREATMENTS ALONG LIBERTY GROVE ROAD AND THE SOUTHERN EDGE OF THE PROPERTY THAT ABUT THE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT THERE.

ACCESS FROM DRIVEWAYS ON LIBERTY GROEFD ROAD AND ONE THING TO NOTE IS THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT THERE ARE AS I MENTIONED BEFORE,

[00:45:01]

FOUR CURRENT BUILDINGS AND SO THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT WILL ONLY APPLY TO THAT SPECIFIC BUILDING WHERE THAT BUSINESS IS LOCATED AND THAT IS 4500 SQUARE FEET. THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL PARKING THAT IS REQUIRED AND FOUR HANDICAP PARKING SPACES.

THOSE WERE ORIGINALLY APPROVED PER THE ORIGINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SITE. PROPOSED STREET PLAN REFLECT THE APPLICANTES DESIGNATED ROOM CONFIGURATION.

YOU CAN SEE ON THE FIGURE TO THE RIGHT THAT HAS THOSE TWO DESIGNATED SUITES IN RED THERE AND THOSE TWO MASSAGE TREATMENT ROOMS ARE BEING REQUESTED AND TOTAL APPROXIMATELY 120 SQUARE FEET EACH. AND SO, LOOKING AT THE SURROUNDING LAND USE ANALYSIS HERE, THE SURROUNDING BUILDING ENVIRONMENT IS MOSTLY RESIDENTIAL UNGEPD LAND.

THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DECEMBER MATES THIS AREA AS RETAIL COMMERCIAL OFFICE SPACE CAN PROVIDE SERVICES TO THE PUBLIC SO TO THE NORTH THERE'S A LARGE UNDEVELOPED LOT TO THE WEST IS MOSTLY FLOOD PLAIN ALONG LIBERTY GROVE TO THE EAST WE HAVE COMMERCIAL VACANT, FOLKS THAT PD THERE AND TO THE SOUTH WE HAVE THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY.

SO HERE'S A PHOTO SHOWING THAT SPECIFIC BUILDING AND BUSINESS AS WELL AS YOU CAN ALSO SEE A LITTLE BIT OF THAT LANDSCAPING THAT FRONTS ON LIBERTY GROVE. SO, NOTIFICATIONS WERE SENT OUT.

CITY OF ROWLETT DOES REQUIRE 200 FOOT MILLING NOTICE AND COURTESY NOTICE. THOSE NOTICES WERE SENT OUT JULY 23RD HAND THERE WERE 40 NOTICES IN FAVOR OR OPPOSITION 200 FEET NOTICES AND WITHIN THE 500 FOOT PUBLIC NOTICE SENT OUT THERE WAS ONE NOTICE IN FAVOR. SO THE RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF IS THE APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR A MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE ON PROPERTY ZONED PLANNED DISTRICT FOR LIMITED COMMERCIAL RETAIL USES, THE PROPOSED SPECIAL USE PERMIT WILL ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL BUSINESS SERVICE AND REASONABLE EXPANSION OF EXISTING PERSONAL SERVICES.

THE APPLICANT WILL BE EXPECTED TO MAINTAIN AN ACTIVE MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE ADMINISTERING MASSAGES IN SPECIFIC AREAS DESIGNATED IN THAT SUITE PLAN IN COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL AN STATE CODES. AND THE APPLICANT IS ALSO HERE

IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS. >> COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? MR. COTE.

>> THIS IS JUST KIND OF A TECHNICAL QUESTION I GUESS.

SO THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS NOT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT, IT'S FOR 124 AND 126 OF THAT ESTABLISHMENT?

>> SO, THE ROWLETT COPED SPECIFIES THAT THE TREATMENT ROOMS THE MASSAGE ROOMS MUST BE DESIGNATED IN THAT SUITE PLAN PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF THAT SPECIAL USE PERMIT SO THEY WANT TO DESIGNATE THOSE SPECIFIC ROOMS PRIOR.

SO IT ALSO SAYS THAT THERE SHALL BE NO MASSAGES ALLOWED IN ANY OTHER SPACE SO IT'S THOSE DESIGNATED SPACES.

>> SO, IF SERVICES INCREASE THE CAPACITY OF THE 124 AND 126 THEY WOULD ACTUALLY HAVE TO COME BACK FOR ANOTHER SPECIAL USE PERMIT?

>> I'M NOT SURE ON THAT BUT I'M SURE THERE WOULD BE A PROCESS FOR THEM TO HAVE COULD COME BACK AS THAT IS LAID OUT SPECIFICALLY THOSE SPECIFIC DESIGNATED SITES WOULD BE APPROVED.

>> ROGER THAT, THANK. >> YES THAT WOULD REQUIRE THEM TO COME BACK TO A BHEND THAT SUP REQUEST TO EXPAND OR CHANGE

THOSE LOCATIONS. >> THANK YOU, ALEX.

THERE WOULD BE AN A PENDING PROCESS.

THANK YOU. >> MR. SWIFT MR. SEGARS ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? DOES THE APPLICANT HAVE A

PRESENTATION? >> THERE'S NO PRESENTATION.

IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT IF ANY OF THE

COMMISSIONERS. >> COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? I DON'T THINK SO.

I THINK WE'RE GOOD. ANY DISCUSSION? I'M ALL FOR IT. IT'S A VERY POPULAR THING.

A LOT OF PEOPLE NEED IT. ALL RIGHT.

SO, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. WE HAVE ANYONE -- I DON'T HAVE ANY CARDS ON THIS ITEM. IS ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK ON THIS

[00:50:03]

ITEM? I WOULD LIKE TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THIS TIME. ANYBODY.

OKAY, SEEING NONE, WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

AND I THINK THAT WE ARE READY FOR MOTION.

MR. SWIFT. >> I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR A MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT

LICENSE. >> WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM 4-B BY MR. SWIFT. DO I HAVE A SECOND? MR. COTE HAS SECONDED. THIS WOULD BE FOR APPROVAL OF THE ITEM. EVERYBODY READY? SUSAN READY? PLEASE VOTE.

AND THAT ONE PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. WE MOVE ON TO ITEM 4-C.

[4C. Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation to City Council on a request by Ryan Alcala, Jones & Carter, Inc., on behalf of property owner Walker Royall, Briarwood Rowlett LLC., regarding a Special Use Permit to allow a restaurant with a drive-thru on an approximately 0.88 acre property zoned General Commercial/Retail (C-2) District. The subject property is located at 3201 Lakeview Parkway, being Lot 4, Block A of Briarwood Armstrong Addition, approximately 560 feet west of the intersection of Rowlett Road and Lakeview Parkway, in the City of Rowlett, Dallas County, Texas.]

CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING MAKE A REJTS TO CITY COUNCIL ON REQUEST BY RYAN ALCALA JONES AN CARTER, INC. ON BEHALF OF PROPERTY OWNER WALKER ROYAL BRIARWOOD ROWLETT LLC REGARDING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THRU ON APPROXIMATELY .88 ACRE PROPERTY, ZONED GENERAL COMMERCIAL/RETAIL C-2 DISTRICT SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3201 LAKEVIEW PARKWAY BRIARWOOD ARMSTRONG EDITION APPROXIMATELY 560 FEET WEST OF THE CONSISTENCY OF ROWLETT ROAD AN LAKEVIEW PARKWAY IN CITY OF ROWLETT

DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. >> WRAP UP WITH THIS REQUEST.

WITH THIS REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR WITH DEVELOPMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 750 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THRU COMPONENT ON COMMERCIAL USE PROPERTY IN TOWN.

NEXT SLIDE HERE. BACKGROUND, NOVEMBER 15 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVED THE ARMSTRONG ADDITION PLAT ESTABLISHING 7 LOTS FOR COMMERCIAL USES SOME FRONTING ON LINCOLN PARKWAY SUCH AS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS WELL AS ONE ON ROWLETT ROAD. 6 OF THE 7 LOTS HAVE EITHER BEGUN OR COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS.

THIS IS THE LAST REMAINING UNDEVELOPED LOT IN THAT SUBDIVISION. SHOULD THIS REQUEST BE APPROVED THEY WILL MOVE FORWARD WITH DEVELOPING A RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THRU COMPONENT. SITE DATA FOR YOU SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET OF FRONT DAMAGE ON -- FRUJ PARKWAY THAT CAN YOU SEE ON SCREEN THAT RED LINE CONNECT TO AN ACCESS ON TO LAKEVIEW PARKWAY TO THE SOUTHEAST OF THE SITE FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS. PROPOSED SITE USE PROCESS THE SITE PLAN REFLECT A 750 SQUARE FEET RESTAURANT BUILDING IN RED ON SCREEN THERE, 11 PARKING STALLS TO A COMPANY IT A ZUMTER ENCLOSURE AND APPROACH, DRIVE THROUGH ESCAPE LANE AREA FOR COMPATABILITY AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON ALL FOUR PROPERTY LINES. YOU SEE THE BLINK AREA IN RED LANDSCAPE AREA IN GREEN AS WELL AS MINIMUM SNACKING DISTANCES IN BLUE. THEY EXCEED THAT.

WITH REZONING WE LOOK AT THIS LAND USE.

THIS ENVIRONMENT IS COMMERCIAL IN NATURE.

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES DESIGNATE THIS AREA AS THE RETAIL COMMERCIAL OFFICE AREA WHICH IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE GOODS AND SERVICES FOR THE PUBLIC.

IT'S WORTH NOTING THE ADJACENTSI EAST WEST AND THERE IS A DEVELOPING SITE TO THE NORTH WITH A 36,000 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING AS WELL AS RETAIL CENTER TO THE WEST THAT IS CULMINATION OF A FEW INDIVIDUAL COMMERCIAL RESTAURANT UNITS. SITE PHOTOS FOR YOU, THIS IS A PHOTO OF A SITE STUCK BETWEEN BLAZE AND PANDA EXPRESS.

THERE ARE PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS.

THERE AS WALK UP WINDOW LARGELY A DRIVE-THRU.

[00:55:09]