[1. CALL TO ORDER]
          [00:00:08]
          >>  ALL RIGHT.  GOOD EVENING EVERYONE.  WELCOME TO THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ROWLETT CITY COUNCIL.  IT IS 7:30.  WE WILL CALL THE REGULAR EATING TO ORDER THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. 
          HAVE A LOT OF EXCITING THINGS ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT FIRST WERE GOING TO YOUR OUR INVOCATION AND WE HAVE REVEREND NATHAN PRESLEY FROM FIRST UNITED METHODIST TO LEAD US ON 
          THIS.  PLEASE RISE. >>  MR. MAYOR PRO TEM HONORABLE COUNCILMEMBERS OF ROWLETT I'M HAPPY TO SHARE THIS INVOCATION WE JOIN WITH ME THOSE WHO ARE PRESENT IN THOSE ARE JOINING US ONLINE FOR A MOMENT OF PRAYER. GRACIOUS AND HOLY LORD.  WE COME BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING LIFTING UP GREAT THANKSGIVING OR YOUR ABUNDANT LOVE THAT HAS AND POURED OUT UPON US AS WE HAVE EXPERIENCED THE RAIN OVER THE LAST FEW DAYS WE ARE REMINDED THAT YOU PROVIDE FOR OUR NEEDS.  AND INDEED OUR GROUND NEEDED THE RAIN AND SO WE HAVE BEEN SO BLESSED.  AND SO LORD, WE THAT YOU WILL CONTINUE TO BLESS US WITH OUR NEEDS AS WE CONTINUE TO LOOK FORWARD TO THE NEEDS IN OUR COMMUNITY.  LORD WE PRAY THIS DAY FOR OUR MAYOR, THE COUNCILMEMBERS, FOR THOSE THAT HAVE BEEN ASKED BY THE PEOPLE TO LEAD, TO BE GIVEN, TO GIVE INSTRUCTION AND DIRECTION FOR THIS TOWN EVER LET.  LORD I PRAY TO YOU GRANT THEM WISDOM TO DISCERN THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS TO KNOW WHAT IS RIGHT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY AND THE PEOPLE NEED.  LORD WE PRAY THAT WE WOULD BE BLESSED WITH THE SERVANT HOOD THAT THEY HAVE LIVED OUT MEN CALLED TO LIVE. LESS OF THE FAMILIES THAT SUPPORT THEM.  LORD WE PRAYER BLESSING UPON ITSELF ALL THOSE THAT HAVE BEEN MOVING IN AND ALL THOSE THAT HAVE BEEN HERE FOR DECADES OR YEARS BEFORE. LORD MAY WE CONTINUE TO FIND THE WAYS TO LOVE OUR NEIGHBORS SO THAT WE MAY SHOW A COMMUNITY TOGETHER THAT IS LEADING OUT INTO THE WORLD.  WE PRAY ALL THESE THINGS IN FAITH THROUGH YOUR SON, JESUS CHRIST OUR 
          RISEN SAVIOR, AMEN. >>  THANK YOU.  WOULD YOU PLEASE JOIN ME IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE? 
          >>  I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.  IN THE TEXAS PLEDGE?  HONOR THE TEXAS FLAG. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE, TEXAS, ONE STATE UNDER GOD ONE INDIVISIBLE. 
          >>  THANK YOU, YOU MAY BE SEATED.  SO, YOU MAY NOTICE WE ARE MISSING ONE TONIGHT. UNFORTUNATELY, COUNCILWOMAN BROWN, HER AND HER BICYCLE DID NOT GET ALONG AND SHE FELL OFF AND BROKE HER KNEE AND SHE IS NOT REALLY VERY WELL AND I WISH HER WELL AND I HOPE YOU ALL KEEP HER IN YOUR PRAYERS THAT SHE HAVE A SPEEDY RECOVERY. ALSO I WANT TO TAKE IT EXCEPT TO RECOGNIZE WE HAVE AT LEAST ONE COUNCIL MEMBER THAT WON'T REJOINING US YOU COUNT MARTHA BUT SHE IS NOT HERE.  EVEN THOUGH WE WILL HAVE ONE MORE MEETING WHERE WE GET TO CANVASS THE ELECTIONS AND BRING THEM IN THIS WILL BE THE LAST THING THAT TWO OF THEM, FOR SURE, WILL BE PRESIDING OVER SO I WANT TO THANK, AND FOR THOSE DEPENDING ON HOW THE ELECTIONS GO IF YOU'RE NOT BACKUP HERE AGAIN, THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE.  I ENJOY WORKING WITH YOU GUYS.  I ENJOY YOUR FREE 
          [5A. Presentation of proclamation recognizing the week of May 15-21, 2022 as National Police Week.]
TIME NOW THAT YOU WILL GET SOME BACK.  SO, WE WILL START WITH PRESENTATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS AND WE HAVE WHITE U OF M.  WE HAVE A LOT OF THEM TONIGHT. THIS IS ITEM FIVE A PRESENTATION UPON NATION RECOGNIZING THE WEEK OF MAY 15TH TO 21ST 2022 AS NATIONAL POLICE WEEK.  AND COUNCILWOMAN PAM BELL IS GOING TO DO THAT FOR US. 
          >>  GOOD AFTERNOON.  I DIDN'T KNOW THAT I WAS FIRST.  THAT'S WHAT I GET FOR NOT LOOKING. LET ME GIVE YOU A LITTLE BACKGROUND IN NATION.  FIRST, I NEED MY, DON'T STAND BACK THERE.  OKAY.  JUST A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND.  THE 
          [00:05:15]
NATIONAL POLICE WEEK HAS BEEN RECOGNIZED IN THE UNITED SINCE 1962.  THROUGH THIS PROGRAM THAT THE NATION CAN BE ALERTED TO THE DANGERS OF POLICE WORK AND TO THE DEDICATION OF THE MEN AND WOMEN THAT THEY SERVE IN THIS OCCUPATION. 
          RECOGNIZING LAW AND FORSTMANN PERSONNEL DURING THIS TIME EACH YEAR ALSO BRINGS ATTENTION TO SERVING FAMILIES, EXCUSE ME, SURVIVING ONLY MEMBERS OF OFFICERS AND TO THE NATIONAL POLICE OFFICERS MEMORIAL WHICH IS LOCATED IN WASHINGTON DC AND ENDED THROUGH PRIVATE DONATIONS AS WELL AS YOUR TAX DOLLARS. 
          EACH YEAR DURING THIS WEEK, THE NAMES OF LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL WHO WERE KILLED IN THE LINE OF DUTY ARE ENGRAVED ON THE NATIONAL POLICE OFFICERS MEMORIAL.  NATIONAL POLICE WEEK IS A WAY OF BRINGING COMMUNITIES ATTENTION TO DEDICATION AND COMMITMENT OF EMPLOYEES OF THE ROWLETT POLICE DEPARTMENT.  SO THAT CITIZEN ARE ACCURATELY AWARE THAT THEY SERVE BECAUSE THEY ARE PROUD. PROUD TO DO SO.  IT IS AN HONOR TO RECOGNIZE THEIR SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY BY DECLARING THIS WEEK MAY 15TH TO THE 21ST, 2022 AS NATIONAL WEEK. 
          ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE JOIN US IN HONORING THOSE THAT HAVE MADE THE ULTIMATE SACRIFICE BY HONORING THEM DURING NATIONAL PEACE OFFICERS MEMORIAL DAY, MAY 15, 2022.  BY REMEMBERING THEM IN YOUR THOUGHTS AND PRAYERS.  I THOUGHT I WAS GOING TO GET SOME MUSIC THERE. [LAUGHTER] PROCLAMATION. 
          WHEREAS CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AS MAY 15TH PEACE OFFICERS MEMORIAL DAY AND THE WEEK OF WHICH MAY 15TH FALLS ON IS NATIONAL POLICE WEEK AND WHEREAS THE MEMBERS OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF ROWLETT PLAY AN ESSENTIAL ROLE IN SAFEGUARDING THE RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF ROWLETT.  AND WHEREAS, IT IS IMPORTANT THAT ALL CITIZENS KNOW THAT, NO ONE UNDERSTAND THE DUTIES RESPONSIBILITIES HAZARD AND ACCRA VICES OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND THAT MEMBERS OF OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT RECOGNIZE THEIR DUTY TO SERVE THE PEOPLE BY SAFEGUARDING LIFE AND PROPERTY.  BY PROTECTING THEM AGAINST VIOLENCE AND DISORDER AND BY PROTECTING THE INNOCENT AGAINST DECEPTION AND WEAK AGAINST OPPRESSION.  AND WHEREAS THE MEN AND WOMEN OF THE CITY OF ROWLETT POLICE DEPARTMENT UNCEASINGLY PROVIDE A VITAL PUBLIC SERVICE.  NOW THEREFORE, I, PAM BELL MAYOR PRO TEM FOR THE CITY OF ROWLETT IN BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL CALL UPON ALL CITIZENS OF ROWLETT UPON ALL PATRIOTIC, CIVIC AND EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS TO OBSERVE THE WEEK OF MAY 15TH THROUGH THE 21ST 2022 AS NATIONAL LEASE WEEK.  WITH APPROPRIATE CEREMONIES AND OBSERVANCES TO WHICH ALL OF OUR PEOPLE MAY JOIN IN COMMEMORATING THE ENFORCEMENT OF OFFICERS PAST AND PRESENT WHO EITHER FAITHFUL AND LOYAL DEDICATION THROUGH THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES HAVE RENDERED A DEDICATED NERVOUS TO THEIR COMMUNITIES AND IN DOING SO HAVE A CATALYST FOR THEMSELVES AND DURING REPUTATION BY PRESERVING THE RIGHT AND SECURITIES OF ALL CITIZENS.  I FURTHER CALL UPON ALL CITIZENS OF ROWLETT TO HONOR THE DAY OF MAY 15TH, 2022 AS NATIONAL POLICE OFFICERS MEMORIAL DAY.  IN HONOR OF THOSE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS WHO THROUGH THEIR COURAGEOUS DEEDS HAVE MADE THE ULTIMATE SACRIFICE IN SERVICE TO THEIR COMMUNITY OR HAVE BECOME DISABLED IN THE PERFORMANCE OF DUTY AND LET US RECOGNIZE AND PAY RESPECT TO THE SURVIVORS OF OUR FALLEN HEROES.  THANK YOU. 
          [00:10:02]
          [APPLAUSE] >>  ARE YOU GOING TO SAY 
          ANYTHING? >>  YOU KNOW, EVERYTHING THAT PAM SAID IS CORRECT.  YOU KNOW, OFFICERS ARE DEDICATED TO SERVICE BUT WE COULDN'T DO WHAT WE DO WITHOUT THE SUPPORT THE PEOPLE IN THIS ROOM, THE SUPPORT OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND HIS OFFICE AND DEPUTY CITY MANAGER BUT ESPECIALLY ALL OF YOU FOLKS WHO ARE OUT HERE PARTICIPATING IN GOVERNMENT. 
          IT REALLY IS A TEAM EFFORT.  WE NEED YOU AND HOPEFULLY YOU NEED US AND I WANT TO SAY THANK YOU TO EVERYBODY IN THIS ROOM FOR ALL OF YOUR SUPPORT OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT.  [APPLAUSE] 
          >>  THANK YOU, CHIEF. >>  YOU GUYS COULDN'T GET AWAY WITHOUT A PICTURE.  THANK YOU FRIES AND THANK YOU TO ALL OF OUR FANTASTIC ROWLETT POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS AND MEN AND 
          [5B. Presentation of proclamation recognizing the week of May 1-7, 2022 as Rowlett Detention Officers Week.]
WOMEN WHO ARE OUT THERE KEEPING US EVERY DAY.  ALL RIGHT, OUR SECOND PROCLAMATION IS ITEM 5B. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING THE WEEK OF MAY 1-7, 2022 AS ROWLETT DETENTION OFFICERS WEEK. COUNCIL MEMBER BLAKE MARGOLIS IS GOING TO READ THIS PROCLAMATION AND IF WE CAN GET OUR DETENTION OFFICERS TO COME ON DOWN? 
          >>  ALL RIGHT.  SO, EVERY YEAR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT PROUDLY CELEBRATES AND RECOGNIZES THE EXCELLENCE OR DELAY SERVICE PROVIDED BY OUR DISTINGUISHED COWORKERS WHO SERVE AS DETENTION OFFICERS.  FEW CITIZENS UNDER UNDERSTAND HOW DEMAND IS THE WORK OF AN OFFICER IS IT REQUIRES DILIGENCE, DEDICATION, QUALITY THAT OUR DETENTION OFFICERS DISPLAY AS THEY TACKLE THE CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES DAILY IN MANAGEMENT OF INMATE POPULATION.  OUR DETENTION OFFICERS MUSTER A CAN-DO WORKPLACE, MAKING THE BEST USE OF AVAILABLE RESOURCES, BEING AN IMPORTANT PART OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN STRIVING FOR EXCELLENCE IN EVERYTHING THAT THEY DO.  THERE IS NOT A DAY AT THE DEPARTMENT THAT OUR DETENTION OFFICERS DO NOT MAKE A DIFFERENT IN THE LEVEL OF POLITY POLICING EVIDENT IN THE CITY OF ROWLETT. 
          THE ROWLETT DETENTION FACILITY IS DAFT BY DEDICATED, WELL-TRAINED DETENTION OFFICERS WHO ARE TASKED WITH DIVIDING FOR THE SUPERVISION AND SECURITY OF INMATES 24 HOUR PER DAY.  OUR DETENTION FACILITY LIKE ANY SIMILAR FACILITY DOES CARRY A LEVEL OF RISK INHERENT IN ITS DAILY OPERATIONS.  ALTHOUGH THEY PERFORM THEIR DUTIES OUTSIDE OF DIRECT PUBLIC VIEW THEY ARE DEDICATED TO PROVIDING THE BEST POSSIBLE SERVICE THEY CAN TO THE COMMUNITY AND ENVIRONMENT THAT COULD QUICKLY TURN DANGEROUS.  EACH YEAR THE FIRST FULL WEEK OF MAY IS RECOGNIZED AS NATIONAL CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS WEEK AND IT IS A TIME TO RECOGNIZE THE AND WOMEN WHO WORK EACH DAY IN JAILS, DETENTION FACILITIES AND RISEN MAINTAINING SECURITY AND PROVIDING SAFEGUARDS TO THE COMMUNITY.  THESE TAKE TIME OUT OF YOUR DAY IN THE WEEK OF MAY FIRST THROUGH THE SEVENTH 2022 TO THINK THOSE MEN AND WOMEN WHO FORM THE RANKS OF OUR DETENTION OFFICERS FOR THE JOB THAT THEY DO DAY IN AND DAY OUT.  AND NOW I WILL READ THE PROCLAMATION.  WHEREAS NO GROUP OF AMERICANS HAS A MORE TO HOLD OR LESS PUBLICLY VISIBLE JOB IN THE BRAVE MEN AND WOMEN WHO WORK IN OUR DETENTION FACILITIES THESE OFFICERS ARE ENTRUSTED WITH THE DIFFICULT AND DANGEROUS ASSIGNMENT OF ENSURING THE CUSTODY, SAFETY AND WELL-BEING OF INMATES IN OUR JAILS.  THEIR POSITIONS ARE ESSENTIAL TO THE DAY-TO-DAY OPERATIONS OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND WITHOUT THEM IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO ACHIEVE FOR MOST INSTITUTIONAL GOALS OF SECURITY AND CONTROL AND WHEREAS DETENTION OFFICERS MUST SET INMATES FROM VIOLENCE FROM LOCAL PRISONERS WHILE MAINTAINING THE SECURITY OF THE FACILITY AND SAFETY OF THE COMMUNITY.  AND WHEREAS IN RECENT YEARS THE DUTIES OF OFFICERS HAVE BECOME RECENTLY COMPLEX AND DEMANDING AS THEY ARE CALLED ON TO FULFILL THE SIMULTANEOUSLY CUSTODIAL SUPERVISORY AND COUNSEL RE-ÁDELETELASTÁ COUNSEL ROLES. 
          PROFESSIONALISM EXHIBITED BY THESE OFFICERS THROUGHOUT THE PERFORMANCE OF DEMANDING AND OFTEN LIFTING ROLES IS DESERVING OF OUR UTMOST RESPECT AND WHEREAS THE IMPORTANT WORK OF OUR DETENTION OFFICERS OFTEN DOES NOT RECEIVE THE 
          [00:15:01]
RECOGNITION IT DESERVES IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THE GENERAL PUBLIC KNOW AND APPRECIATE THE CAPABLE HANDLING OF THE PHYSICAL AND EMOTIONAL DEMANDS MADE UPON THEM DAILY OR THEIR PROFESSION REQUIRING CAREFUL AND CONSTANT DILIGENT WITH THE THREAT OF VIOLENCE WAS PRESENT. AND, WHEREAS IT IS APPROPRIATE THAT WE HONOR OUR DETENTION OFFICERS FOR THEIR INVALUABLE CONTRIBUTIONS, THEIR CONSISTENT COMMITMENT TO SOCIETY AND FOR THEIR MANY CONTRIBUTIONS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS MADE BY THESE MEN AND WOMEN WHO ARE A VITAL COMPONENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT. 
          NOW THEREFORE, I, BLAKE MARGOLIS OF THE CITY OF ROWLETT AND ON BEHALF OF CITY COUNCIL DUBAI PROCLAIMED THE WEEK OF MAY ONE THROUGH SEVEN, TO 22 AS ROWLETT ATTENTION OFFICERS WEEK IN THE CITY OF ROWLETT AND ENCOURAGE ALL RESIDENTS TO JOIN THE COUNCIL AND RECOGNIZE THE REALLY OUTSTANDING DETENTION OFFICERS IN ROWLETT BUT ALSO AROUND THE NATION WHO DEDICATE THEIR LIVES TO THE SECURITY OF THEIR COMMUNITIES.  THANK YOU. 
          [APPLAUSE] >>  INCORPORATED YOU GUYS FOR ALL YOU DO AND EVERYBODY IN OUR PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISION, FIRE, PARAMEDICS, DETENTION AND ALL THE SUPPORT STAFF INCLUDING 911 DISPATCHERS WE RECOGNIZE THEM WHAT THEY ARE BUT YOU CAN NEVER SAY ENOUGH ABOUT THE WORK GUYS AND GALS DO IN OUR CITY EVERY DAY.  I KNOW ON THE BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL THANK YOU GUYS 
          [5C. Presentation of proclamation recognizing the month of May, 2022 as National Motorcycle Awareness Month.]
FOR EVERYTHING.  NOW ONTO SOMETHING I BET A LOT OF YOU WOULD LIKE TO DO AND THAT IS RIGHT A MOTORCYCLE.  OUR NEXT PARKINGPRESENTATION IS A PROCLAMATION OF RECOGNIZING THAT THE MONTH OF MAY 2022 AS NATIONAL MOTORCYCLE AWARENESS 
          MONTH. >>  I WOULD LIKE INVITE CHIEF MILLER TO COME ON DOWN.  THIS IS YOUR NIGHT. 
          >>  MORE AND MORE MOTORCYCLISTS ARE ENTERING THE ROADWAY.  ALL DRIVERS SHOULD BE TAKING PRECAUTIONS, CHECKING BLANK BOX, USING TURN WHEN CHANGING LANES.  THIS PROCLAMATION IS TO INFORM WRITERS AND MOTORISTS ON MOTORCYCLE SAFETY ISSUES TO REDUCE MOTORCYCLE RELATED RISKS, INJURIES AND FATALITIES. 
          IT IS VERY IMPORTANT BECAUSE SOME OF OUR OFFICERS ARE ON MOTORCYCLES.  WE HAVE THREE MOTORCYCLE OFFICERS.  SO WHEREAS, TODAY'S SOCIETY IS WRITING MORE CITIZENS INVOLVED IN MOTORCYCLING ON THE ROADS OF OUR COUNTRY AND WHEREAS WATERSIDE LIST ARE ROUGHLY AND PROTECT IT MORE PRONE TO INJURY OR DEATH IN A CRASH OTHER THAN VEHICLE DRIVERS.  AND WHEREAS CAMPAIGNS HAVE HELPED INFORM WRITERS AND MOTORISTS ALIKE MOTORCYCLE SAFETY ISSUES TO REDUCE MOTORCYCLE RELATED RISKS, INJURIES AND MOST OF ALL FOR TALLIES.  THROUGH A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH TO MOTORCYCLE SAFETY AND WHEREAS IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF ALL WHO PUT THEMSELVES IN THE WHEEL TO BECOME AWARE OF MOTORCYCLE WAS REGARDING THEM WITH THE SAME IS AS ANY OTHER VEHICLE TRAVELING THE HIGHWAYS OF THIS COUNTRY.  IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF WRITERS AND MOTORISTS ALIKE TO OBEY ALL TRAFFIC LAWS AND SAFETY RULES AND WHEREAS URGING ALL CITIZENS OF OUR COMMUNITY TO BECOME AWARE OF THE INHERENT DANGER INVOLVED IN OPERATING A MOTORCYCLE IT GIVES OPERATORS ON THE ROAD THE RESPECT THEY DESERVE.  SO THEREFORE, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY COUNCIL DO HEREBY PROBE NAME THE MONTH OF MAY, 2022 AS MOTORCYCLE SAFETY AWARENESS MONTH IN THE CITY OF ROWLETT AND URGE ALL CITIZENS TO DO THEIR PART TO INCREASE SAFETY AND AWARENESS IN THE COMMUNITY.  [APPLAUSE] YOU ARE ALL GOING TO BE SAYING WHEREAS 
          [5D. Presentation of proclamation recognizing the week of May 9-13, 2022 as Economic Development Week.]
          [00:20:06]
AFTER THIS NIGHT IS DONE.  WE HAVE ONE MORE PROP NATION THIS IS A PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING THE WEEK OF MAY 9-13, 2022 AS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WEEK. 
          AND WHO DO WE HAVE HERE THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICE? MARK?  CHARLES?  HOW DO YOU SAY YOUR LAST NAME.  THANK YOU FOR COMING OUT.  GOOD.  WE HAVE MARK WITH US AND MICHAEL. 
          THANK YOU GUYS FOR COMING.  THE INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL HAS SET ASIDE THIS WEEK TO RECOGNIZE PRACTITIONERS AND THE WORK THEY DO TO CREATE ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES TO EXPAND TAX BASE IN THEIR COMMUNITIES WITH BUSINESS RETENTION UP ENTREPRENEURSHIP'S AND INITIATIVES.  THE ROWLETT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT COLLABORATIVELY WITH REGIONAL PARTNERS TO FOSTER ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY GROWTH.  STAFF MEMBERS INCLUDE JENNIFER STEWART SENIOR ADMIN ASSISTANT CHARLES MEZA RAKAS ECONOMIC SPECIALIST LIBBY TUCKER IS THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT. 
          TOGETHER THEY WORK TO CREATE AWARENESS AND PARTNERSHIPS WITH EXISTING BUSINESSES THROUGH EXPANSION PROGRAMS EXISTING BENEFIT GROWTH ACCOUNTS FOR 80 PERCENT OF NEW JOBS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY SO THIS PROGRAM IS ESSENTIAL TO OUR STRATEGIC ACTIONS.  OUR TEAM CONDUCTS ACTIONS TO BRING NEW JOBS AND INVEST TO ROWLETT.  THEY DO THIS THROUGH OUTREACH WITH CORPORATE AND COMMERCIAL REALTORS TO CREATE AWARENESS OF THE WHICH IS PRIMARILY LANES. THIS IS NORTH SHORE AND SAPPHIRE BAY AND THEY WORK WITH DEVELOPERS IN THE PARKING OF AVAILABLE LAND FOR INFILL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS.  TO PARTNER WITH THE ROWLETT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WE ASSIST ENTREPRENEURS AND HELP AS IS CONNECTS WITH OTHER PARTNERS FOR DEVELOPMENT PIPELINES.  THE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL TO WHICH THE APARTMENT IS A MEMBER IS A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION OF THIS PROFESSION AND HAS SET ASIDE THIS WEEK TO PROMOTE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OFFICIALS AROUND THE WORLD AND I DON'T KNOW IF THIS WAS JUST LUCK OR TIMING THAT WE ARE HOPEFULLY GOING TO BE BEATING TONIGHT THE ARTIST POSSIBLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE CITY OF ROWLETT AND WE GET TO RECOGNIZE A LOT OF INDIVIDUALS HERE THAT GOT TO DO A LOT OF HARD WORK IN BRINGING THAT TO FRUITION. 
          THANK YOU GUYS FOR ALL YOUR HARD WORK.  I WILL NOW READ THE PROCLAMATION.  WHEREAS THE INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL IS THE LARGEST PROFESSIONAL ECONOMIC ELEMENT ORGANIZATION DEVELOPED TO SERVING ECONOMIC DEVELOPERS AND WHEREAS THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL PROVIDES LEADERSHIP AND EXCELLENCE IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OR COMMUNITY MEMBERS AND PARTNERS THROUGH CONFERENCES, TRAINING COURSES, ADVISORY RESOURCES IN DEPTH PUBLICATION AND POLICY ADVOCACY AND WHEREAS ECONOMIC DEVELOPERS PROMOTE WELL-BEING AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF THEIR COMMUNITIES BY TREATING, RETAINING AND CRATING JOBS TO PROVIDE ENHANCED WEALTH IN A STABLE TAX BASE.  THEY INCUBATE ENTREPRENEURIALISM TO ESTABLISH NEW BUSINESSES WHICH IS THE HALLMARK OF THE AMERICAN ECONOMY AND WHEREAS ECONOMIC DEVELOPERS ARE EACH IN A WIDE VARIETY OF SETTINGS INCLUDING RURAL AND URBAN, LOCAL STATE PROVINCIAL AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE UNIVERSITIES AND A VARIETY OF OTHER INSTITUTIONS AND WHEREAS ECONOMIC HELPERS ATTRACT AND RETAIN HIGH-QUALITY JOBS DEVELOP VIBRANT COMMUNITIES AND IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THEIR REGION ARE THEREFORE I MET RCOUNCILMEM MATT GRUBISICH RECOGNIZE THE WEEK OF MAY NINTH THROUGH MAY 13TH, 2022 AS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WEEK.  [APPLAUSE] THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN.  NO MORE BLUE FOLDERS.  NO MORE HER AS. 
          [5E. Presentation of the 2022 Rowlett Arts and Humanities Commission’s Young Artist Exhibit winners.]
YOU HAVE TO COME BACK IN A FEW WEEKS BUT WE DID GET TO RECOGNIZE A WONDERFUL YOUNG LOCAL ARTIST AND I THINK WE HAVE A BUNCH OF THEM IN THE AUDIENCE WITH US TONIGHT. 
          LAURA AND DEBORAH ARE GOING TO COME APPEAR AND HELP US PRESENT 
          SOME GREAT AWARD. >>  GOOD EVENING SEDIMENT CITIZENS, COUNSEL, I AM LAURA TURNER STAFF LIAISON FOR THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES COMMISSION. I AM HERE WITH OUR CHAIR DEBORAH CROSBY AND WE ARE GOING TO BE PRESENTING AWARDS TO THE WINNERS OF THE YOUNG ARTISTS EXHIBIT.  THE YOUNG ARTISTS 
          [00:25:01]
EXHIBIT IS A REGIONAL COMPETITION SPONSORED ANNUALLY BY THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES EXHIBIT.  IT IS OFFERED TO HOMESCHOOL STUDENTS FROM INNER GARDEN TO HIGH SCHOOL.  ALL ENTRIES WERE ON DISPLAY IN THE LIBRARY FROM MARCH 26 THROUGH APRIL 22ND.  THE YOUNG ARTISTS EXHIBIT INCLUDED BOTH TWO-DIMENSIONAL AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL CATEGORIES IN THE FOLLOWING DIVISIONS. TWO, GRADES K THROUGH FIVE GRADES K THROUGH EIGHT, GRADES NINE THROUGH 12 AND SPECIAL NEEDS STUDENTS. THIS YEAR THE COMMISSION RECEIVED 74 ENTRIES FROM SEVEN DIFFERENT SCHOOLS.  WE WANT TO THANK ALL OF THE TEACHERS WHO WORKED WITH THEIR STUDENT INSPIRING THEIR STUDENT, HELPING THEM CREATE AND HELPING THEM ENTER THE SHOW.  WE COULD NOT DO IT WITHOUT YOU.  THANK YOU AND LET'S GIVE A ROUND OF APPLAUSE FOR THE TEACHERS. 
          [APPLAUSE] FIRST PLACE WINNERS IN EACH CATEGORY RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING AWARDS.  STUDENTS IN GRADES SIX THROUGH EIGHT WILL RECEIVE A $50 PRIZE, SPECIAL NEEDS TUNES RECEIVE A $50 PRIZE, STUDENT IN GRADES NINE THROUGH 12 RECEIVED A $100 PRIZE.  SECOND PLACE WINNERS FOR GRADES 9 TO 12 RECEIVED RISES OF $75 AND THIRD PLACE WINNERS RECEIVE $50 IN BOTH TWO-DIMENSIONAL AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL CATEGORIES. 
          WE HAVE SOME OF THE WINNERS HERE IN THE AUDIENCE WITH US. 
          ALONG WITH A PRESENTATION OF THEIR WINNING ARTWORK.  FOR TWO-DIMENSIONAL ART GRADE SIX THROUGH EIGHT DIVISION WE HAVE OCEAN BY GEORGIA MUST COUGH. FOR TWO-DIMENSIONAL AND IF YOU ARE HERE PLEASE COME UP AND GET YOUR AWARD.  FOR TWO-DIMENSIONAL GRADES NINE THROUGH 12 DIVISION WE HAVE QUIET WITH JADE TAYLOR. [APPLAUSE] FOR TWO-DIMENSIONAL SPECIAL NEEDS DIVISION, ONE UP BY ANDREW TOWNSEND.  [APPLAUSE] [APPLAUSE] THREE-DIMENSIONAL GRADE SIX THROUGH EIGHT DIVISION KEY TO MY HEART BY ABBY CEBALLOS.  [APPLAUSE] FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL GRADES NINE THROUGH 12 VISION AQUARIUM BY JENNIFER LUNA.  [APPLAUSE] AND, NEXT WE HAVE OUR SECOND PLACE WINNERS TWO-DIMENSIONAL RATE SIX THROUGH EIGHT DIVISION TYLER BY E ON A WASHINGTON.[APPLAUSE] TWO-DIMENSIONAL GRADES TWO THROUGH 12 DIVISION MELTING HEREBY SIERRA. >[APPLAUSE] TWO-DIMENSIONAL SPECIAL NEEDS DIVISION MAGIC SCHOOL BUS BY HANNAH FOREMAN. 
          [APPLAUSE] THREE-DIMENSIONAL GRADE NINE THROUGH 12 DIVISION WE HAVE KINDNESS BY DOLCE MARTINEZ.  [APPLAUSE] AND NOW FOR OUR THIRD PLACE WINNERS TWO-DIMENSIONAL GRADE SIX THROUGH EIGHT DIVISION MARYLAND STATE FLAG ENTANGLED Y.[INDISCERNABLE] TWO-DIMENSIONAL RATES NINE THROUGH 12 DIVISION THREE OF MANY COLORS BY.[INDISCERNABLE] TWO-DIMENSIONAL SPECIAL NEEDS DIVISION MY RACE BY JUSTICE MATTHEWS.[APPLAUSE] AND THEN THREE-DIMENSIONAL GRADES NINE THROUGH 12 DIVISION ROSE BY JENNIFER LUNA.  [APPLAUSE] AND THAT'S IT.  LET'S GIVE THEM ONE MORE ROUND OF APPLAUSE FOR THEIR WONDERFUL ART. [APPLAUSE] 
          [00:30:42]
          [APPLAUSE] >>  CONGRATULATIONS AGAIN TO ALL OF THOSE WINNERS.  THERE IS ANOTHER CONTEST ON DISPLAY AND IT'S A PHOTOGRAPHY CONTEST OR ART CONTEST?  ART CONTEST. 
          THERE WAS SOME AMAZING OF ART OVER THERE AS WELL.  ITEM 5F. 
          [5F. Presentation of the second quarter investment report for March 31, 2022.]
PRESENTATION OF THE SECOND QUARTER INVESTMENT REPORT FOR 
          MARCH 31, 2022. >>  THANK YOU.  I APPRECIATE IT.  GOOD EVENING COUNSEL I AM ROBERT COHEN THE CITY'S BUDGET OFFICER AND I AM HERE TO PRESENT THE SECOND ORDER INVESTMENT REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING IN 2022.  BEFORE WE GET INTO THE DETAILS OF THE REPORT LET'S REMEMBER THAT THE TEXAS FUNDS INVEST IN ACT REQUIRES ANNUAL ADOPTION OF OUR INVESTMENT POLICY AS WELL AS A QUARTERLY PRESENTATION TO COUNCIL.  OUR INVESTMENT REPORT IS CURRENTLY PREPARED BY PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT IN OUR ACCOUNT AND ENJOY NATHAN SMITH IS HERE TONIGHT TO DISCUSS RESULTS. OUR INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES ARE AS FOLLOWS FIRST AND FOREMOST IS SAFETY OF THE INVEST IS A QUIDDITY TO ENSURE CASH FLOW AND FINAL OBJECT IS RATE OF RETURN.  WE HAVE TWO PERFORMANCE MEASURES SHORT-TERM INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO IS MEASURED BY THE WEIGHTED AVERAGE RETURN OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT POOL WHILE THE GOAL OF OUR LONG-TERM INVESTMENT AND IS TO EXCEED THE 1 TO 3 YEAR TREASURY INDEX. WITH THAT, I WILL TURN THE PRESENTATION OVER TO NATHAN SMITH TO REVIEW THIS IS REPORT. 
          >>  GOOD EVENING.  I KNOW FOR A FACT I CAN SAY I'M NOT NEARLY AS CREATIVE AS THE PREVIOUS PEOPLE WHO WERE UP HERE.  THIS MAY NOT BE AS UPLIFTING AS THOSE STORIES WERE BUT I WILL GIVE IT A SHOT.  SO, THIS EVENING'S REPORT FOR THE SECOND ORDER CITY OF ROWLETT SECOND QUARTER FISCAL YEAR FIRST THREE SLIDES THAT WE WILL LOOK AT A PRETTY HEAVY ECONOMIC STUFF THAT I THINK IT IS SETTING A GOOD FOUNDATION OF THE PORTFOLIO AND WHAT TO EXPECT GOING TOWARD SO I WILL START ON PAGE 3 THE ECONOMIC SNAPSHOT, REALLY QUICK.  GENERALLY SPEAKING THE EMPLOYMENT REPORT LABOR MARKET IS IMPROVING.  THE UNEMPLOYMENT REPORT FOR APRIL IS DOWN TO SORRY, LET ME GET MY GLASSES ON.  FOR APRIL, IT WAS, MARCH WAS 3.6 PERCENT AND CERTAINLY IMPROVING.  CHANGE IN NON- FOREIGN PAYROLLS IMPROVE IPHONE OR THOUSAND THAT IS ALL VERY POSITIVE AND HEADED IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.  FROM THE RESPECTIVE OF GROWTH DOMESTIC PRODUCT IT WAS ACTUALLY REPORTED RECENTLY THEN FIND THE ECONOMY CONTRACTED AS MEASURED BY THE.  IT WAS DOWN 1.4 PERCENT HICH IS NOT POSITIVE, NOT OVERLY POSITIVE BUT THERE WERE A NUMBER OF PATS THAT MAKE THE THAT WERE ACTUALLY QUITE POSITIVE, TOO INCLUDING CONSUMER SPENDING WHICH MAKES UP TWO THIRDS OF THE ECONOMY AS IS.  RETAIL SALES IS IMPROVING. 
          17.5 PERCENT.  IN FEBRUARY.  A LARGE PART OF THAT RISE IN RETAIL ALES HAS TO DO WITH INFLATION AS WE ALL KNOW EVERYTHING IS A LITTLE MORE EXPENSIVE NOW, QUITE A BIT MORE EXPENSIVE AND AS PRICES GO UP SODAS GROWTH RETAIL SALES NUMBERS.  INFLATION HAVING SPOKE TO THAT IS THE KEY COMPONENT IN THIS REPORT.  IT AND PROBABLY GOING BACK AS FAR 
          [00:35:01]
AS SEPTEMBER.  THE MARCH CONSUMER PRICE INDEX MEASURES INFLATION WAS UP 8.5 PERCENT YEAR AFTER YEAR AND THAT IS UP FOR THE MONTH.  THE CONSUMER PRICE INDEX OR EXCLUDE MORE VOLATILE FOOD AND ENERGY PRICES WAS UP SIX AND HALF PERCENT. 
          THE LAST TIME I WAS A PEER I SAID THIS IS TRUE AGAIN.  BOTH OF THOSE NUMBERS ARE AT A 40 YEAR HIGH GOING BACK TO 1982. 
          MOVING FORWARD.  ALL OF THAT PREDOMINANTLY THE INFLATION REPORT FEEDS INTO THE RATE ENVIRONMENT AND WHAT YOUR PORTFOLIO LOOKS LIKE IN TERMS OF GROSS YIELD AND A RETURN. 
          THAT IS AFFECT BY WHAT FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE DECIDES ON OVERNIGHT FEDERAL FUNDS RATES.  THEY INDICATED THAT RATE WILL BE INCREASED BY AT LEAST FIVE TIMES THEY INCREASED THE RATE HIGH-FIVE ASUS POINTS IN MARCH WHICH IS THE FIRST INCREASE IN THEY CUT THE RATE IN MARCH OF 2020.  THEY ARE MEETING YESTERDAY AND TODAY AND TOMORROW IT WILL MAKE THEIR FINAL REPORT ON WHAT THEY ARE EXPECTED TO DO FOR THE FED FUNDS RATE THIS TIME.  THE EXPECTATIONS WILL BE RAISED BY 50 BASIS POINT AND SUBSEQUENT MEETING ARE EXPECTED TO RAISE IT ANOTHER 50 POINT MAYBE AS MUCH AS EVERY FIVE ASUS POINT AND IF YOU LOOK AT THIS BOTTOM LEFT I WILL POINT OUT ONE YEAR TREASURY.  A YEAR AGO IT WAS .06 PERCENT SO BASIS POINT. 
          THIS MORNING THAT WHEN YOU'RE TREASURY WAS 206 IT HAS INCREASED 200 BASIS POINT IN ONE YEAR AND THAT IS INDICATIVE OF THAT SHOPRITE YIELD CURVE ON THE US TREASURY YIELD CURVE. 
          YOU CAN SEE THE YELLOW DOTTED LINE IS A YEAR AGO.  THE BLUE LINE, THE DOTTED IS DECEMBER INTO LAST YEAR AND THEN THE DRAMATIC ON THE FRONT IN OF THE CURVE FROM THREE MONTHS TO TWO YEARS AND THAT IS A DIRECT RESULT OF THE MARKET EXPECTATION FOR THE FED TO CONTINUE TO RAISE RATES THROUGH THIS YEAR.  AND RAISE THEM AT A READY QUICK CLIP AS WELL.  THAT IS THE NOT SO UPLIFTING ECONOMIC SNAPSHOT IF ANYONE HAS ANY QUESTIONS.  OKAY.  LET'S LOOK AT THE PORTFOLIO.  THE TOTAL BALANCE OF THE PORTFOLIO REMAINED RELATIVELY UNCHANGED OVERALL TO INCLUDE YOUR LIQUID POLE BALANCES AND THAT IS ONE OF $56 MILLION AT THE END OF MARCH.  THE PORTION THAT PFM ASSET MANAGED IS ABOUT 44 MILLION AND THAT WAS EVENLY DIVIDED BETWEEN TREASURIES, SOME COMMERCIAL PAPER AND FEDERAL AGENCY OBLIGATIONS. YOUR PORTFOLIO REMAINED COMPLIANT WITH THE PUBLIC FUNDS INVESTMENT ACT AND THE CITIES INVEST POLICY AND IS INVESTED IN THE HIGHEST RATED POLICY PAPER THAT WE CAN AND IS PERMITTED AND REQUIRED BY YOUR POLICY.  BREAKING IT DOWN PORTFOLIOS.  THERE IS A SHORT TERM POLE FUND WHICH IS THE TOP MIDDLE A LONG TERM POLE FUND AND IN THE BOTTOM IS A 2019 BOND FUND.  A SHORT TERM HOLD FUNDS I WANT TO POINT OUT YOU LOOK AT THE RIGHT HAND COLUMN UNDER THE DATE THE DIFFERENT YIELD YIELD BEING MEASUREMENT OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PORTFOLIO.  AT THE TIME OF PORTFOLIOS PURCHASE OF THE SECURITIES THAT RANGE THE PORTFOLIO YIELD ON COST THE YIELD OF MATURITY AT THE TIME OF JUST WAS 26 BASIS POINTS ON THE SHORT-TERM POLE AND 53 BASIS POINTS ON THE LONG-TERM AND THEN THE BOND FUND WAS 15 BASIS POINT.  YOU CAN SEE THE YIELD TO MARKET SO, THOSE SECURITIES WERE PURCHASED AND HELD TO SECURITY.  THOSE YIELDS ARE GENETICALLY HIGHER AND THAT IS AGAIN, A REFLECTION OF THE MARKET EXPECTATION FOR HIGHER RATE SO SECURITY PURCHASED SIX-MONTH AGO IS GOING TO BE REQUIRING A HIGHER YIELD NOW TO 
          [00:40:02]
PURCHASE THAT.  THAT IS WHAT WE SEE THE SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM POLE FUND THE CURRENT YIELD TO MARKET IS CONSIDERABLY PHIGHER THAN WHAT THEY WERE AT THE TIME OF PURCHASE.  AND THEN LASTLY, THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PORTFOLIO THE PORTFOLIO LEARN INTEREST OF $38,840 THROUGH THE ORDER.  THAT NUMBER PALES IN COMPARISON IN THE CHANGE OF VALUE.  AGAIN, THE FACET OF SECURITIES WITHIN THE PORTFOLIO AS THEY ARE PURCHASE THEY, IN A RISING RATE ENVIRONMENT THAT PRICE IS A COMPLETE INVERSE OF THE RATE.  AS RATES CLIMB THE PRICE FALLS.  THOSE ARE UNREALIZED LOSSES, I SHOULD WE KNOW IN THE POSITIVE, THERE IS A POSITIVE TO COME OUT OF THIS. AS SECURITIES IN YOUR LEO MATURE AND EACH OF THE FUND SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM POLE FUNDS, THOSE SECURITIES THOSE MONIES WILL BE REINVESTED AT HIGHER RATE.  YOUR INTEREST INCOME, YOUR REALIZED INTEREST INCOME WILL BE HIGHER GOING AS SECURITIES SURE OFF OF PORTFOLIO.  THE PORTFOLIO WHILE IT IS A NEGATIVE NUMBER THE BENCHMARK WAS A -2.34 PERCENT AND AS ROBERT MENTIONED THE BENCHMARKS OF 1 TO 3 TREASURY INDEX FUND AND THE PORTFOLIO PERFORMED SLIGHTLY BETTER THAN THAT.  A NEGATIVE 2.11 PERCENT. 
          THAT IS ON A TOTAL RETURN BASIS AND THAT INCLUDES THE MARKET VALUES AS WELL AS ANY INTEREST INCOME THAT COMES INTO THE 
          FOLIO.  ANY QUESTIONS? >>  ANY QUESTIONS COUNSEL? 
          COUNCILMEMBER MARGOLIS? >> PUBLIC SPEAKER:  THE INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE REVIEW I WILL SAY THAT THE NEW COUNSEL WILL NEED TO PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO THE MARKET IN THE POTENTIAL FOR AN ECONOMIC RECESSION AND TYPE IN THE NEXT YEAR OR TWO YEARS DOWN THE ROAD GIVEN THE HIGH RATION OR OTHER FACTORS IN MY BUTT ON THE OTHER HAND WE ARE DOING EXCELLENT FINANCIALLY AND THE NEW COUNSEL WILL HAVE PLENTY OF ROOM TO WORK WITH GOING INTO THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR. 
          >>  THANK YOU.  AND BRIAN JUST POINTED OUT WHEN I FIRST GOT ON COUNSEL I SERVED ON THE FINANCIAL MEDIA AND THE NUMBERS LOOKED BETTER BACK THEN.  WHEN I LOOK AT THIS OVER A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME IT MIGHT NOT LOOK LIKE WE ARE HITTING THE BENCHMARKS BECAUSE OF WHAT THE CURRENT ECONOMIC CONDITIONS. 
          BUT CITIES AREN'T THE TRADERS THEY INVEST FOR THE LONG HAUL AND WE LOOK AT THE LONG HAUL IS BUILT WHETHER THOSE AND THE CITY IS IN A BETTER FINANCIAL POSITION EVER BEEN AT THIS CURRENT TIME AND WELL SUITED TO WRITE THIS OUT.  THANK YOU FOR THAT REPORT ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?  THANK YOU.  DID YOU WANT TO ADD ANYTHING.  ALL RIGHT.  ITEM 5G UPDATE FROM THE 
          [5G. Update from the City Council and Management: Financial Position, Major Projects, Operational Issues, Upcoming Dates of Interest and Items of Community Interest.]
CITY COUNCIL AND MANAGEMENT: FINANCIAL POSITION, MAJOR PROJECTS, OPERATIONAL ISSUES, UPCOMING DATES OF INTEREST AND ITEMS OF COMMUNITY INTEREST.ND FOR THE VERY LAST TIME, THE VOICE, COUNCILMEMBER BROWNIE SHERRILL. 
          >>  ELECTION DAY IS THIS SATURDAY, MAY SEVEN THE CITY'S GENERAL AND SPECIAL ELECTION FOR CITY COUNCIL.  ROWLETT RESIDENTS WILL VOTE IN THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNTIES.  IF YOU'VE BEEN PONDERING PITTER PATTER OF FOREPAWS, THE ANIMAL SHELTER IS FULL OF DOGS YOU MAY FIND THE RIGHT TO EXPAND YOUR FAMILY. 
          THEY ARE STILL VERY CODE RED DOG.  PLEASE HELP THESE PUPS WITH YOUR FOREVER HOME.  ONE OF THE CUTIES AVAILABLE IS ZEKE. 
          BECAUSE BEEN WITH US SINCE TOBER.  THIS SAYS, LOOK AT THAT.  I HAD TO ASK WITH THAT DIRT WAS.  THAT IS HIS TONGUE STICKING OUT.  I WAS GOING TO GET LAURA TO SHOW YOU BUT SHE HAD TO SHOW ME WHAT IT WAS. LACK HE IS A GOOD-LOOKING BOY. 
          DIRECTLY FROM THE PEOPLE WHO SERVE THE CITIZENS ROWLETT THE ACADEMY IS OPEN FOR REGISTRATION FOR THE SUMMER SESSION BEGINNING JUNE SECOND. IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE ROWLETT 
          [00:45:06]
FIRE DEPARTMENT AMERICAN RED CROSS NORTH TEXAS AND OFFERING A FREE HOME POWER SAFETY EVENT ON THURSDAY MAY FIFTH FROM 9:00 11:00.  YOU CAN ALSO REGISTER FOR FREE SMOKE ALARM INSTALLATION.  THE FIRST 300 FAMILIES ALSO RECEIVE A FAMILY FOOD BOX FROM THE NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK.  FOR MORE INFORMATION ON THESE AND ALL OTHER CITY EVEN PLEASE VISIT ROWLETT.COM OR CALL THE ACTION CENTER AT 972 ? 412 ? 6100. 
          >>  THANK YOU, SIR.  YOU MAY HAVE A JOB THOUGH.  'S I DON'T 
          [6. CITIZENS’ INPUT]
KNOW WHOEVER THE NEXT MAYOR IS NOT CALL YOU BACK IN.  ALL RIGHT, AT THIS POINT WE ARE GOING TO DO OUR CITIZEN INPUT PORTION OF THE MEETING.  WE HAVE A COUPLE OF IN PERSONS AND THEN I'M GOING TO READ A COUPLE OF EMAILS WE HAVE SO, OUR FIRST 
          PERSON IS DEB GENDER. >>  FOLLOWED BY DAVE HALL. 
          NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE. 
          >>  MY NAME IS DEBORAH'S GENDER , KNOW.  THERE'S BEEN A WHOLE LOT OF PROCLAIMING GOING ON HERE TONIGHT AND I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SOME COMMON ON THE TOPICS OF SOME OF THOSE PROCLAMATION. NATIONAL POLICE WEEK IS ONE THAT HAS ALWAYS VERY NEAR AND DEAR TO MY HEART  FOR OBVIOUS REASONS. LAW ENFORCEMENT LIKE OUR CITY ITSELF HAS THROUGH A LOT OF CHANGES OVER THE YEARS. IT IS VERY DIFFERENT THAN IT WAS BACK WHEN I WORE A BATCH. IT IS EVEN MORE STRESS WILL, MORE DANGEROUS, MORE DIFFICULT FOR OFFICERS TO NAVIGATE THE AREA OF EVER-CHANGING LAWS AND SOCIETAL EXPECTATIONS.  YOU CAN LEAVE LAW ENFORCEMENT WHICH I MANY OF MY FRIENDS HAVE DONE BUT LAW ENFORCEMENT NEVER REALLY LEAVE YOU.  THEY SAY THAT YOU ARE A COP YOU ARE ALWAYS A COP.  IF YOU TAKEN THE OATH.  THERE IS SOMETHING INSIDE YOU THAT EVER GOES AWAY. 
          I JUST WANT TO SALUTE OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT, IT LEADERSHIP AND ALL OF ITS MEMBERS AND I WANTED TO KNOW THAT I STAND BEHIND THEM AND I APPRECIATE ALL THEY DO AND ALL THEY SACRIFICED TO KEEP OUR COMMUNITY SAFE.  THE DETENTION OFFICERS ALSO WORK IN THE SHADOWS AND AS BLAKE MENTIONED THEY AREN'T OFTEN BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC THAT THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAKE KEEPING OF PRISONERS IN THE JAIL FACILITIES AND I'M GLAD TO SEE THEM BEING RECOGNIZED AS WELL.  LASTLY, I DID NOT EXPECT THE TALKING TONIGHT ABOUT NATIONAL MOTORCYCLE AWARENESS MONTH.  BUT THEN THEY STEP IN AND THE TIMING OF THIS ITEM BECAME BOTH PERFECT AND HORRIBLE.  LAST NIGHT, MY COUSIN MESSAGED ME TO TELL ME THAT A GOOD FRIEND OF OURS, A LONG-TERM FRIENDS, 30 YEARS OR SO, WAS INVOLVED IN A MOTORCYCLE ACT SUNDAY NIGHT AND PASSED AWAY LAST NIGHT.  THIS TREND HE HAD MADE SOME MISTAKES IN HIS LIFE THAT HE WAS FINALLY EATING TOGETHER.  HE HAD A NEW JOB, HE HAD A NEW GIRLFRIEND AND HE RECENTLY GOT A NEW BIKE AND I HE MAY HAVE LOVED THAT BIKE MORE THAN ANY OF THE OTHERS.  HE LOVED TO RIDE OR THAN ALMOST ANYTHING AND IT BREAKS MY HEART THAT HE IS WAS CUT SHORT.  THERE IS SOME COMFORT IN THE KNOWLEDGE THAT HE WAS DOING WHAT HE LOVED TO DO.  I JUST WANT TO SAY, REST IN PEACE TO MY FRIEND RONNIE. 
          FINALLY, THIS IS THE LAST REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING BEFORE THE ELECTION.  I WANT TO SAY TO THE OUTGOING COUNCILMEMBER, THAT, THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE.  I MIGHT NOT HAVE ALWAYS AGREED WITH EVERY ONE OF YOUR DECISION BUT I KNOW HOW MUCH TIME AND EFFORT AND WORK GOES INTO THIS AND I KNOW HOW THANKLESS THE JOB IS.  ROWLETT IS A DIFFERENT PLACE TODAY. 
          >>  KEEP GOING. >>.WILL BE A DIFFERENT PLACE NOW THAN IT IS TODAY.  THANK YOU. 
          >>  THANK YOU AND I AM SORRY FOR YOUR LOSS.  REGARDLESS OF HOW THE ELECTION GOES I HOPE YOU KEEP COMING AND SPEAKING BECAUSE YOU BRING VERY GOOD AND VALID POINTS WHETHER YOU ARE AT THE DAIS OR STILL SPEAKING AT PUBLIC INPUT.  ALL RIGHT.  DAVE 
          HALL FOLLOWED BY JEFF WIDGET. >>  JEFF HALL, ADDRESS].  I TRIED TO GET THIS DOWN AS SHORT AS I COULD.  WE 
          [00:50:06]
GOT TO FIVE MINUTE SO I REALIZED I WILL GIVE HALF OF IT TODAY.  I WILL BE BACK IN A COUPLE WEEKS TO GIVE THE OTHER HALF AND I EMAILED THE ENTIRE FIVE MINUTE YOU WILL GET BACK TONIGHT.  TEN-MONTH AGO WHILE TALKING WITH GARY ANNA I TOLD GARY THE CITY SHOULD NOTIFY ME IN ADVANCE WHEN THEY WERE PLANNING ON SAYING MILLER ROAD IN FRONT OF MY BUSINESS SO I WOULD HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO NOTIFY MY CUSTOMERS AND HE AGREED.  SEVERAL WEEKS AGO THE CITY WAS MILLER ROAD IN FRONT OF MY BUSINESS WITHOUT NOTIFYING.  I CALLED GARY SEVERAL TIMES SEEKING AN EXPLANATION OF MY CALLS WERE NOT RETURNED.  THE RAILROAD CONSTRUCTION DAMAGE THE AREA SINCE ROWLETT STAFF DID NOT HELP ME I TALKED WITH THE ON-SITE RAIL SUPERVISOR TWICE AND CALL THE REAL OFFICE ONE. 
          THE REAL CONTRACT REPAIRED MY EASEMENT DRIVE TO MY SATISFACTION WHILE THE CITY WAS UNABLE TO HAVE THE REAL CONTRACT REPAIRED THE REST OF THE DAMAGE.  ON TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 2022 I SAW A LARGE TRUCK PARKED ON MY RECENTLY REPAIRED EASEMENT DRIVE.  HERE IS A PICTURE OF THAT TRUCK.  IT TURNED OUT TO BE A CITY OF ROWLETT TRUCK.  ASKED HIS SUPERVISOR TO MOVE THE TRUCK AND NOT DAMAGE MY DRIVE.  HE WAS DISTURBED BI MY REQUEST AND PROCEEDED TO TELL ME THAT MY EASEMENT DRIVE WAS NOT IN CODE COMPLIANCE.  HE SAID CODE ENFORCEMENT WOULD COME OUT AND REQUIRE ME TO REMOVE THE RUBBLE STONE SURFACE IMPLANT REST OVER THE EASEMENT DRIVE.  I THEN ASKED HIM AGAIN TO MOVE HIS TRUCK AND HE DID GREAT IN ADDITION THE CITY HAS WALKED OFF 10 PARKING SPACES IN PADDLE POINT PARK ONE CITY TRUCK AND WHEN CITY TRAILER.  HERE IS A PICTURE OF THIS.  WHAT ABOUT THE RESIDENTS WHO WANT TO USE PADDLE PARK?  I CALLED MUNAL MULLIDAD AND EXPLAIN THE SITUATION IS SHE SAID SHE WOULDN'T ESTIMATE AND GET BACK. 
          THE NEXT MORNING, WEDNESDAY, APRIL 27 2022 WHILE WALKING MY DOG I SAW THAT MY EASEMENT DRIVE WAS AGAIN BLOCKED BY ROWLETT CONSTRUCTION.  AS I WALKED DOWN THE DRIVE I SAW ONE OF THE ROWLETT EMPLOYEES PLACE AN EMPTY BEER BOTTLE IN FRONT OF MY MAILBOX.  I ASKED HIM TO PUT IT IN THE TRASH.  HE AND THE REST OF THE EMPLOYEES IGNORED ME.  I TOOK OUT MY PHONE AND ASKED THE ROWLETT WAYS TO LOOK AT ME AND I TOOK SEVERAL PICTURES OF THEM.  HERE IS A PICTURE.  YOU CAN SEE WELL I DON'T KNOW IF YOU CAN GET BUT YOU CAN SEE THE YOUR BOTTLE IN FRONT OF MY MAILBOX.  THE BALD PERSON IN THE MIDDLE WAS ON GLASSES ON TOP OF HIS HEAD BEGAN TO TAUNT AND WAVED AT ME. 
          WHEN HE CALLED THE POLICE I LEFT THE AREA.  
          MICROPHONE] ELITE. >>  DID YOU SAY THAT YOU'RE GOING TO COME BACK?  YOU, SIR. JUST WIDGET FOLLOWED BY DAN 
          GLEASON.  [INDISCERNABLE] >>  GOOD EVENING HONORABLE COUNSEL I HAVE COME TO YOU TO DISCUSS ITEM 8A.  I'M CERTAIN YOU RECALL THE EVENTS OF 2018 AND 2019 WHERE OUR CITY FOUGHT BAYSIDE LAND PARTNERS TO MAINTAIN THE SPIRIT OF THE DEVELOPMENT SAPPHIRE BAY DID A SOMEONE WHO IS VERY OLD OPEN ABOUT THE ORIGINAL BAYSIDE VISION THAT IS AN EIGHT ACRE CRYSTAL LAGOON LAS VEGAS STYLE WATER FEATURE SHOW FOUNTAIN AND TROLLEY SYSTEM THAT CONNECT THE VARIOUS STRIPS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT, I FEEL VERY MUCH OBLIGATE IT TO APPEAR HERE TO MY INVOICE CONCERNED CONCESSION THAT DETRACT FOR THE SPIRIT AGAINST WHICH WE TRY TO FIGHT HARD OR JUST A FEW YEARS AGO. 
          I WILL BE ONE OF THE BE ONE OF THOSE TO SAY THAT WHAT WE HAVE HERE AT FIRE BAY HAS SO MUCH MORE POTENTIAL THAN WHAT WE GIVE IT TO FOUR.  I'VE MENTIONED THE WORD SPIRIT COUPLE OF TIMES AND I WILL SAY IT AGAIN.  THIS COUNSEL NEEDS TO FIGHT TO KEEP THE SPIRIT OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ALIVE DETRACTING FROM THE VISION WE ONCE HAD HOWEVER MINOR THOSE CHANGES WILL BE THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT HAS BEEN WRITTEN IN SUCH A WAY THAT WE ARE SACRIFICING TOO MUCH OR AT LEAST IT SEEMS.  THE ADDITION OF THE TERM EITHER IN THE HOTEL LAWS GIVES US THE OPTION OF EITHER A WORLD-CLASS 
          [00:55:02]
RESORT AND ASSOCIATED RESTAURANT SERIES OR WHAT IS ESSENTIALLY A HOLIDAY IN IT.  I LIKEN THAT TO THE CHOICE BETWEEN A FOR ARI AND ALTHOUGH. THE VOLVO DRIVES NINE BUT IT DOESN'T ELITHE SPIRIT OF AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT CLASS.  IT ALSO HAS A DRAMATIC REDUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF CONVENTION INTERSPACE AS CONVENTIONS OF ALL SORT GROW IN SIZE OF POPULARITY THE CONCEPT OF A VENUE BEING REDUCED IN SIZE BY OVER 65 PERCENT IS BAFFLING TO ME.  ROWLETT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO HAVE SOME INCREDIBLE EVENTS IN THE FUTURE RIGHT ON THE SHORE OF LAKE RAY HUBBARD AND ASKED TO SET OF EYES AGAIN.  IN CLOSING I WANT TO SHARE SOMETHING WITH YOU.  THIS SIGN. 
          IT IS GOING ON FOUR YEARS OLD AND I HAVE IT BECAUSE IT'S IMPORTANT TO ME.  I MENTIONED EARLIER THE HUGE ADVOCATE OF THE ORIGINAL VISION AND I WANT TO REMIND COUNSEL HOW THAT CAME TO BE.  THERE WAS A GRASSROOTS EFFORT OF A NUMBER OF RESIDENT WHO FOUGHT AGAINST BAYSIDE LAND PARTNERS ALONGSIDE A CITY WE DIDN'T HAVE THE RESOURCES TO BATTLE A WEALTHY GROUP OF INVESTORS WERE LOOKING TO TAKE IT VANTAGE OF OUR TOWN BUT WE SCRAPE TOGETHER WHAT WE COULD AND WE DID IT ANYWAY.  WE DIDN'T HAVE A SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING THEY HIRED BUT WE TOOK TO FACEBOOK AND WE DID IT ANYWAY WE DIDN'T HAVE THE LEGAL BACKING US TO DO THE RESEARCH ON EVERY WHIM SO WE LEARN WHAT WE COULD AND WE DID IT ANYWAY BECAUSE WITH THOSE INVESTORS DIDN'T HAVE WAS A LOVE ROWLETT IN THE SPIRIT OF WHAT BAYSIDE AND SAPPHIRE BAY WERE ENVISIONED TO BE SO I ENCOURAGE ALL THE COUNCILMEMBERS TONIGHT TO HANG ONTO THE VISION, HANG ONTO THAT.  AND BUILT OUR SAPPHIRE BAY.  THANK YOU. 
          [APPLAUSE] >>  THANK YOU, JEFF.  HOLD ONTO THAT SIGN.  DAN GLEASON FOLLOWED BY STEPHANIE HIGGINS. 
          >>  DAN GLEASON, WITH THE SAME THING AS FAR AS SAPPHIRE BAY AND I WANT TO REMIND CITY COUNCIL THAT WE ALL HAVE A LOT INVESTED IN THIS AND WE SHOULD NOT BACK DOWN AND MAKE CONCESSIONS.  JUST TODAY'S HEADLINES, IN DALLAS BUSINESS JOURNAL, DFW STANDS OUT AMONG GROWTH MARKETS WHEN IT COMES TO RETAIL.  SECOND HEADLINE, WHY DFW IS LEADING THE NATION IN HOTEL CONSTRUCTION?  WE ARE AT THE FOREFRONT AND THE BEST TIME TO BE DOING THIS AND WE SHOULD NOT BACKING DOWN IN ANY WAY AND I SAY GO FULL SPEED!  WE ARE BEHIND ON TIME AND BUDGET.  GET GOING.  LET'S GET MOVING.  IT'S 
          ONLY GOING TO GET WORSE.  GO! >>  THANK YOU, SIR.  STEPHANIE 
          HIGGINS? >>  STEPHANIE HIGGINS, ADDRESS].  I GUESS WE TALKED ABOUT THE HOTEL AND DEATH ALREADY AND AS FAR AS REDUCING I'M DEFINITELY AGAINST THAT. 
          WE DEFINITELY HAVE TO HOLD ON WE DID ORIGINALLY AND GO FOR THE LARGER CONVENTION ENTER AND HOTELS.  I WAS A LITTLE CONFUSED AND I ASKED LAKE ABOUT THIS EARLIER ON WHY THERE IS AN OPTION FOR AN OFF NIGHT BOAT RANCH TO BE MOVED FROM SAPPHIRE BAY INTO ANOTHER AREA AND THEN THE CONCERN I HAVE WITH THAT IS IF WE MOVE IT TO ANOTHER AREA ANYWHERE ON THE OTHER SIDE OF 30 WE WOULD NOT HAVE ISSUES GETTING LARGER BOATS AND SAILBOATS THROUGH.  AND THE FACT THAT THEY WOULD ONLY BE PROVIDING TO $250,000?  THAT WOULDN'T EVEN GET ESSAYS EDGE OF LAND TO PUT THAT ON.  I THINK THAT MIGHT NEED A LITTLE REVISION IF 10 TO 15 TO 20 YEARS FROM NOW IF WE HAD TO MOVE THE BOAT THAT PORTION OF THE CONTRACT TO BE REVISED TO ALL THE INFLATION COSTS AND EVERYTHING WE ARE GOING TO BE INCURRING IF WE HAVE TO MOVE THAT INTO AN AMPLE LOCATION FOR THOSE LARGER BOAT.  THAT ALL I HAVE.  THANK YOU.  OKAY.  I HAVE A COUPLE OF EMAILS FIRST IS JILL RILEY.  THE DEVELOPERS OF SAPPHIRE BAY WITH MY COMMITMENT BE MADE TO THE MASTER HOTEL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN ORDER TO MEET THE CHANGING DEMANDS OF THE ECONOMY I DO NOT AGREE WITH THE REQUEST.  THE DEVELOPER SHOULD BE HELD TO THEIR ORIGINAL AGREEMENT.  I STRONGLY WILL IMPACT DECISION SHOULD WAIT FOR THE NEW CITY COUNCIL SO PLEASE, TABLE THIS DECISION UNTIL THE.  CURRENTLY THE ECONOMY HAS NOT BEEN DOING WELL.  GIVE A RANGE VISION IN THE CITY.  SAPPHIRE BAY IS THE LAST OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE ROWLETT DESTINATION CITY RATHER THAN A PASTOR CITY AND THE MASTER PLAN IGNITION GATEWAY WAS ALSO SUPPOSED TO BE A DESTINATION ENTERING INTO THE CITY.  SOMEHOW THEY DECIDED PUTTING A LARGER COMPLEX WITH NO MARTIAL USE WAS JUSTIFIED AND SAPPHIRE BAY SO BIG AND GRANTS.  IF YOU DECIDE TO GRAND VISION SAPPHIRE BAY NOT ONLY WILL THEY LOSE THE GROUND ATTRACTION FIRE BAY IN THE REVENUE IS SUPPOSED TO GENERATE 
          [01:00:02]
THE MASTER PLAN TO WHAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN TO APPEALING DESTINATIONS INTO INTO THE CITY WILL BE SQUANDERED LEAVING TAXPAYER RESIDENTS WITH WASTE OF TAX DOLLARS.  THE ECONOMY HAS ALWAYS HAD ITS UPS AND DOWNS AND CONSEQUENTLY ROWLETT WILL CONTINUE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE ORIGINAL SAPPHIRE BAY PLAN.  WHEN THE ECONOMY TURNS AROUND ROWLETT WILL BE READY. 
          CONSIDER THIS DALLAS IS EXPANDING EXPANDING CONVENTION CENTER EXCITING NEWS FOR THE CITY AND MEETING WINNERS WHO ARE LOOKING FOR GAME CHANGING IN THE FUTURE.  IT WILL HAVE 800,000 SQUARE FEET OF SPACE AND BALLROOM SPACE WITH OUTDOOR EVENT TERRACE FEATURING USE OF DOWNTOWN DALLAS.  IT IS SAPPHIRE BAY PENINSULA VIEW OF LAKE RAY HUBBARD.  DALLAS IS LOOKING FORWARD NOT JUST ADD TODAY.  THE VISION OF THE ORIGINAL SAPPHIRE BAY WITH ITS INVITING CRYSTAL RIVERS LARGE CONVENTION CENTER, NICE RESTAURANTS AND LAKE TRAILS FOR THIS IS OUR CHANCE TO SHOW WHETHER OUR CITY WILL BE A TRUE GAME CHANGING DESTINATION CITY OR REMAIN A PASTOR CITY. 
          PLEASE LOOK FOR THE FUTURE. >>  BRIAN GILARDI.  UNDER THIS YOU WILL LOVE EIGHT WENT TO HEREBY REQUEST THE CITY GRANT ME WHATEVER TIME IS VARIED TO PROVIDE A READING OF THESE COMMENTS REGARDLESS OF THE THREE MINUTE RULE.  I WILL READ FAST.  UP DATE SAPPHIRE BAY MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND THE SECOND HOTEL CONVENTION AGREEMENT ON THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AS A VOTING ITEM FOR THE CHANGES FOR THE AGREEMENT ARE FAR-REACHING CHANGING SOME OF THE AMENITIES THAT ARE REQUIRED LOWERING THE OVERALL INVESTMENT REQUIRED OF THE DEVELOPER IF NOT ELIMINATING THE MAJOR CONVENTION CENTER.  I'VE SERIES OF RUSSIANS I NEED TO BE ANSWERED PRIOR TO ANY VOTE I COUNSEL.  WHY IS THE LANGUAGE OF THE WHOLE DEVELOPER BEING CHANGED TO ALLOW LESS IN THE INVESTOR ONE ALIEN?  I DON'T BELIEVE ELEMENT COSTS HAVE DECLINED SINCE THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT WAS SIGNED IN JULY 2019.  WHAT IS BEING REMOVED ON THE PROJECT TO MAKE THE NECESSARY REQUIREMENTS TO BE ALTERED?  ONE OF THE AMENITIES CRYSTAL IS BEING REPLACED AND THE MINIMUM FEATURE OF THE SAME SIZE AND WITH THE DESIGN PARAMETERS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT B WHERE IT IS A SIMPLE TWO-DIMENSIONAL DRAWING SHOWING A ROUGH SHAPE OF THE WATER CHAIR.  IT INCLUDES A REFERENCE TO QUALITY CRYSTAL LAGOON BRAND WHICH IS WELL KNOWN.  ALL WE HAVE NOW IS THE LANGUAGE.  IT IS THEY.  SOMETIMES APPROPRIATE FOR A SIMILARS SIZE SCOPE AND COMPLEXITY.  THE HOTEL NOW INCLUDES A 180 ROOM PREVIOUSLY REFERRED TO AS A BOUTIQUE HOTEL IS NOW SAYING THE LAKE LIKE WATER FEATURE SHOULD BE APPROPRIATE FOR 180 NON-RESORT HOTEL.  WE KNOW WHAT IS PRECISELY PLANNED FOR THE WATER FEATURES BEFORE WE REMOVE A KNOWN ALI PRODUCT?  HOTEL AGREEMENT IS TO KEEP REQUIREMENTS TO BUILD A LARGE CONVENTION STYLE HOTEL WITH WHICH ABOUT REQUIRING ITEMS. AS I READ IN THE DOCK THE PENALTY FOR NOT VOTING THE LARGE HOTEL WAS SIMPLY THE CITY STOPPED SELLING ON AND IT WOULD HAVE BEEN USED TO BUILD THE CONVENTION CENTER OF THE LARGE HOTEL.  IS THIS ENOUGH TO MAKE SURE THE DEVELOP HER DELIVERS TO CONSTRUCT A FULL-SERVICE CONVENTION HOTEL?  WHAT IS THE STATUS OF THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE DESTINATION OF HYATT MET HEAVY BACKED OUT.[BLEEP] DEE LINK WHICH PARAGRAPH OR OF THE HOTEL AMENDMENT IS INCONSISTENT SAYING BOTH THE DEVELOPER MUST KEEP THE DESIGN OF SUBSECTION 1 HOTEL WITHIN TWO YEARS OF THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION OF SAPPHIRE HOTEL IN SUBSECTION HOTEL DESIGNS SHALL WITHIN TWO YEARS OF THE DESIGN OF THE SUBSECTION HOTEL.  WHAT IS IT THE COMMITMENT OF INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN MAC EXHIBIT B SHOWS THE RESORT AND CONVENTION CENTER STARTING IN 2025.  IS THIS CONSTRUCTION OR DESIGN?  THE LANGUAGE IN PARAGRAPH TWO OF THE HOTEL AGREEMENT NEEDS TO BE UP NEEDED TO REFLECT THE RESTAURANT IS A COMPONENT TO THE 180 ROOM.  WHY IS THE DEFINITION OF A CAN CENTER BEING MODIFIED - SCHEDULED IN EXHIBIT B, 24,000 SQUARE-FOOT FACILITY QUALITY AS A CONVENTION CENTER UNDER THE DEFINITION OF OBJECT.  THE CITY THROUGH THE LEFTOVER 2.6 MILLION FROM THE SANITARY SEWER PROJECT FUND OF MIXED BEVERAGE TAX AND WATER IMPACT FEES WILL SUPPLY THIS LINE FROM PRINCETON TO SAPPHIRE BAY.  THAT IS TO BE BUILT THE DEVELOPER.  DO WE HAVE A COST ESTIMATE FOR THE PROJECT?  IS THERE A CEILING FOR WHICH THIS CANNOT BE USED OR IS IT A BOTTOM AS WELL OF FUN FOR ALL COSTS THAT THE SILVER MIGHT ENCOUNTER?  IN 
          [01:05:02]
LAST FROM LORI GILARDI, YOU ARE RIGHT.  THANK YOU FOR THAT CATCH.  ALL RIGHT.  THAT IS OUR PUBLIC INPUT.  NOW WE ARE GOING 
          [7. CONSENT AGENDA]
TO MOVE ONTO THE CAN INCIDENT THAT WHICH COULD BE ACTED UPON IN ONE AND WE HAVE CHOSEN TO PULL ITEMS 7D FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND IF YOU WOULD READ THE OTHER REMAINING ITEMS INTO 
          THE RECORD, PLEASE. >>  7A. CONSIDER APPROVING THE MINUTES. 7B. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION APPROVING A TASK AUTHORIZATION FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN WORK. 
          7C. CONSIDER ACTION APPROVING A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT. 
          7E. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF FUEL. 
          >>  I AM SORRY.  WE GOT THROUGH THEM ALL.  ALL RIGHT. 
          COUNCILMEMBER ROBERT BLAKE MARGOLIS DO WE HAVE A MOTION? ALL RIGHT WE HAVE A MOTION, DO WE HAVE A SECOND, COUNCILMEMBER WHITNEY LANING?  HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND ANY DISCUSSION? OKAY, CALL A VOTE.  THAT PASSES 5-0 WITH ONE ABSENT.  ALL 
          [7D. Consider a resolution supporting the reservation of qualified mortgage revenue bonds for the Rowlett Housing Finance Corporation. ]
RIGHT.  NOW WE ARE GOING TO DO ITEM 7D HERE THIS WAS PRESENTED IN THE WORK SESSION.  THIS IS RICK STILL HERE?  DO YOU WANT TO COME UP REALLY QUICK AND GIVE A REALLY QUICK SYNOPSIS? I KNOW WE SAID WE WOULD DO IT BUT FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO MIGHT HAVE THE WORK SESSION AND WANT TO WATCH YOU DON'T MIND GETTING UP ON THIS FOR THE MOMENT AND IT GIVES YOU AN OPPORTUNITY TO 
          TALK ABOUT THIS. >>  RICK CHATFIELD, ADDRESS].  WHAT THIS IS IS WE ARE REQUESTING COUNCIL APPROVAL THAT THE HSE HAS ISSUED OR A NEW PROGRAM TO PARTICIPATE WITH THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND HOUSING ERRORS IN THE TEXAS LOTTERY BOARD IN WHICH SINGLE-FAMILY BONDS WILL BE ISSUED FOR TD HCA MANAGE THE PROGRAM AND OFFER REDUCED MORTGAGES FOR PEOPLE TRYING TO BUY HOMES.  ALSO AS PART OF THE PROGRAM WILL BE ABLE TO APPLY FOR DOWN PAYMENT ASSISTANCE ON WHICH TDHCA WILL BE ABLE TO USE THEIR OWN DOWN PAYMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM SO THEY CAN ESSENTIALLY DOUBLE-DIP AND GET ADDITIONAL MONIES IN THE FORM OF GRANT FOR DOWN PAYMENT. 
          LASTLY THEY CAN APPLY FOR MORTGAGE CREDIT CERTIFICATE THAT CAN GIVE THEM UP TO A $2000 TAX CREDIT OR NOT A TAX SEDUCTION BUT A TAX CREDIT ON THEIR FEDERAL INCOME TAXES THE PARTICIPATION FEE IS $500. THIS PROGRAM HAS BEEN WELL ABOVE ARMIES BEFORE SO THIS HAS BEEN BENEFICIAL AND WE DO RECEIVE 20 TO 30 BASIS POINTS ON EXPANDED BALANCES.  WITH THE CITY AND IN PARTNERSHIP WITH PROGRAMS THAT YOU WILL HEAR ABOUT AT THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING. 
          >>  YOU WILL DO A BETTER JOB OF EXPANDING THAT AS I DID.  IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO SEE A FULL DISCUSSION ON THE ITEM WE DISCUSSED THAT IN THE WORK SESSION YOU CAN GO BACK AND WATCH THAT, COUNCILMEMBER BROWNIE SHERRILL I DIDN'T READ INTO THE RECORD BUT I WILL AND THEN READ INTO THE MOTION. 
          OKAY.  7D. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE RESERVATION OF QUALIFIED MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS FOR THE ROWLETT HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION. DO I HAVE A MOTION?  COUNCILMEMBER BROWNIE SHERRILL? 
          >>  I VOTE TO MOVE ITEMS 7D. >>. 
          >>  THAT MOTION PASSES 5-0. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR BEING 
          [8A. Consider action to approve a resolution approving the First Amendment to Master Development Agreement and the Second Amendment to Hotel Development Agreement with Sapphire Bay Land Holdings I, LLC for the Sapphire Bay project.]
HERE, RICK.  ALL RIGHT WE ARE NOW GOING TO MOVE ON TO OUR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION WORSEN OF THE MEETING AND WE HAVE QUITE A FEW ITEMS ON HERE. WERE GOING TO START WITH THE BIG ONE 8A. CONSIDER ACTION TO APPROVE.  A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO MASTER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO HOTEL DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH SAPPHIRE BAY LAND HOLDINGS I, LLC FOR THE SAPPHIRE BAY PROJECT. THE CITY MANAGER IS GOING TO KICK US OFF WITH A PRESENTATION. 
          >>  THANK YOU, MARY.  ALL RIGHT.  ALL RIGHT.  WE ARE 
          [01:10:06]
GOING TO TALK ABOUT SAPPHIRE BAY AS WELL AS THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT.  I DO WANT TO SAY RIGHT OFF THE BAT THAT OUR VISION FOR THIS PROJECT IS NOT CHANGED.  THIS IS A LEGACY PROJECT OR ROWLETT.  ONE BILLION-DOLLAR EXCUSE ELEMENT ON THE SHORES OF LAKE HUBBARD. 
          THE LAGOON AMENITY IS NOT GOING AWAY.  ISLAND ENTERTAINMENT FEATURE IS STILL THERE WITH A SYNCHRONIZED WATER AND VIDEO SHOW.  THERE STILL A RESORT AND CONFERENCE CENTER.  WHAT IS BEING ADDED TONIGHT IS A SECOND HOTEL.  WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT'S CLEAR.  IT'S NOT A SUBSTITUTE IS A SECOND HOTEL. 
          A WORLD-CLASS MARINA A SURFAND BEACH CLUB AND SAPPHIRE BAY BE A NATIONAL DESTINATION FOR CONFERENCES, VACATION FAMILIES RESIDENT LOOKING FOR A UNIQUE PLACE TO STAY HOME AND BUSINESSES TO RELOCATE WHERE PTHEY CAN WORK AND PLAY.  I WAN TO BRING US BACK TO 2013.  IN 2013 THE CITY OF DALLAS CREATED THE SPARK PEERED BOTH SIDES NORTH AND SOUTH OF I 30.  AT THAT POINT, BAYSIDE CAME INTO BEING.  TWO YEARS LATER WE WERE ABLE TO CLOSE ON THE DEAL AND WE ACQUIRED BOTH THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH AND AT THAT POINT IT WAS ENVISIONED TO BE A BILLION-DOLLAR PROJECT.  AS YOU ALL KNOW THE NORTHSIDE IS VIRTUALLY NO DOUBT HOUSE OUTSIDE WITH ALL THE INFRASTRUCTURE IS IN AND THE FIRST 389 MILLION DOLLARS WORTH OF BUILDING PERMITS HAVE BEEN ISSUED.  THE POINT I WANT TO MAKE IS THIS PROJECT HAS ABSOLUTELY GROWN OVER TIME AND WILL CONTINUE TO GROW. PROJECTS LIKE THESE MORPH OVER TIME AND CHANGE DUE TO CONDITIONS.  WE KNOW THAT BUT WHAT WE HAVE NOT DONE IS ERODED OUR VISION FOR THIS PRODUCT. 
          ALREADY WE HAVE A NATIONALLY BRANDED DEVELOPER THAT IS GOING TO BUILD ON THIS PROJECT AND THERE IS A WHOLE HOST PEOPLE LINED UP TO PARTICIPATE AS WELL.  ONE COMPANY HAS PULLED THEIR BUILDING PERMIT, ZALES HAS PULLED THEIR FIRST BUILDING PERMIT WE ALSO HAVE, I HAVE IT ON THE NEXT SLIDE.  FLOOR DAYS. 
          THEY HAVE PULLED THEIR FIRST BUILDING PERMITS FOR THOSE PROJECTS TOTAL $389 MILLION PER THEY ARE STARTING IN ADDITION TO THAT WE HAVE ARTIE ANNOUNCED THE HOTEL CONCEPT DESTINATION BY HYATT AND THE POINT I WANT TO MAKE TONIGHT, DESTINATION BY HYATT WANTS TO RUN A BIG RESORT AND A SECOND HOTEL.  YOU'RE GOING TO END UP WITH TWO HOTELS ON THIS AND WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN CONCERNED THAT WE WEREN'T SURE IF WE HAD ENOUGH CONFERENCE INTERSPACE TO BEGIN WITH.  BUT THERE WOULD BE SPILLOVER IN THE SECOND HOTEL WILL FILL THAT NEED.  BEFORE I MOVED TO THE OTHER SLIDES I WANT TO MAKE A POINT ABOUT THE LOCATION OF THE SECOND HOTEL.  ONE THING THAT COMES INTO QUESTION ABOUT THE STATE TAX REBATE IS THAT THE CITY HOUSE ON THE PROPERTY 1000 FEET IN DIAMETER AROUND THE CONFERENCE CENTER.  IN THE ORIGINAL DESIGN WITH THE RESORT CAN Y'ALL SEE THAT ON YOUR SCREEN?  IF YOU LOOK AT THE RESORT CONFERENCE CENTER BEING RIGHT HERE LET'S SAY THAT THAT CIRCLE IS 1000 FEET THE TAXES THAT COULD GO TO THE STATE IS LIMITED BY THE CIRCLE.  BY MOVING THAT TO ACROSS THE LAGOON TO CAPTURE A MUCH BIGGER VERSION OF IT AND THEREFORE IT INCREASES THE AMOUNT OF REVENUE FROM THE STATE TAX REBATE PROGRAM WHICH YOU KNOW INCLUDE SALES TAXES, LODGING AND MIXED BEVERAGE.  THOSE ARE BIG DOLLARS WHEN YOU CAN OR WHAT GOING ON WITH THAT.  AGAIN, THERE IS A STRATEGIC REGION FOR THIS AND ALSO A TERM FOR MARKET 
          [01:15:05]
CONDITIONS A REASON FOR DOING THIS.  THE OTHER THING THAT WAS REALLY INTO DEVELOPERS WITH THIS IS THEY WANTED TO FACE WHAT THEY WOULD CONSIDER TO BE FIRST PHASE PHASE I TO US. 
          THEY'VE BEEN TOLD BY THEIR LENDERS AND THEIR INVESTORS THAT THE LAGOON AND PARK HAVE TO GO IN THE FIRST PHASE.  SOME OF THOSE AMENITIES THAT ARE SO IMPORTANT TO THE PROJECT HAVE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE FIRST PHASE THEY FELT ALSO THAT THEY EXPLAINED TO US THAT STARTING WITH THE SMALLER HOTEL WITH THOSE AMENITIES WOULD BETTER POSITION THE PROJECT SUCCESS. 
          YOU WILL HEAR FROM OUR DEVELOPER LATER WITH WHAT THE LATEST UPDATE IS ON THAT. AGAIN, SAPPHIRE BAY RESORT YOU CAN SEE THE RESORT, THE LAGOON AND OF COURSE THERE WILL BE CONDO TOWERS TO BE BUILT AND THEY WILL COME AT A LATER PHASE AND FOR RIGHT NOW THE CONFERENCE CENTER THE MAJOR RESORT ACROSS THE LAGOON, THE LAGOON AND THE ISLAND FUTURE WHAT WAS IMPORTANT ABOUT THIS SLIDE IS ORIGINALLY THEY SHOULD TO OFFICE BUILDINGS.  THIS FACED NORTH AND THE MAJOR RESORT IS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF LAGOON.  THIS PARTICULAR STRUCTURE IS WHAT THEY WANT TO DO WITH THE TEAK HOTEL.  THAT IS THE ONE THAT IS 180 ROOMS IF I CAN REMEMBER RIGHT.  THIS IS THE ONE THAT WOULD END UP HAVING 24,000 SQUARE OF CONFERENCE SPACE.  THIS WOULD END UP BEING THE CONFERENCE CENTER THAT WE WOULD USE FOR THE STATE TAX REBATE AND THAT WOULD BE THE PROGRAM AS WE ENVISION IT.  THE SURF VILLAGE IS OBVIOUSLY GOING TO BE A BIG DEAL.  NOT ONLY IS IT DRIVING SOME OF THE RETAIL AND OTHER TYPES OF AMENITIES WE WILL SEE IN THIS AREA BUT ALSO AS ANOTHER REASON FOR NOT ONLY ONE HOTEL, TWO HOTELS AND MORE THAN THAT JUST BECAUSE OF THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC THAT THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT WILL BRING IN.  IN ADDITION, OFF OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THIS IS WHERE YOU WILL SEE THE TOWNHOME IN THE MULTI-FAMILIES THAT WILL BE BUILT.  THOSE PROJECTS ARE UNDERWAY THERE THAT'S WHERE YOU SAW THE 389 MILLION SOME OF IT IS THOSE PROJECTS THERE IN ADDITION THOSE COMING BACK ON THE NORTH SIDE THE FOUR-DAY PROJECT IS ALSO STARTING THERE AS WELL.  SO, ZELL PROPERTY THIS SLIDE SAID SPRING 2022 AND THEY HAVE ALREADY STARTED.  IF YOU DRIVE THERE THE CRANE WAS ON THE SOUTHWEST WHERE THEY WERE ALREADY STARTED.  THOSE PROJECTS ARE GOING TO BE BUILDING APPROXIMATELY IF I REMEMBER RIGHT THEY WILL PULL DOWN FIVE OF THOSE TOWNHOMES AT A TIME AND BUILD THOSE.  IT WAS INTERESTING ON THIS THAT THE BACKLOG OF PEOPLE INTERESTED, PEOPLE THAT SAID THEY WANTED TO PURCHASE ONE OF THOSE TOWNHOMES WAS UP TO 1800 PEOPLE FOR THIS. OBVIOUSLY THERE'S NOT THAT MANY TOWNHOME STYLE WILL BE USED OLD BUT THE MARKET IS SHOWING US THAT PEOPLE WANT TO BUY AND THEY WANT TO BUY DOWN THERE. 
          THIS IS THE CENTER OF THE PROJECT.  IT WOULD BE NORTH OF THE SECOND BOUTIQUE HOTEL AS YOU COME INTO THE PROJECT FROM THE NORTH INTO IT.  THE FIRST MULTI FAMILY TYPE APARTMENT THAT YOU WILL SEE OR THE PROJECT WILL BE THIS PROJECT AS YOU COME INTO THE ROAD GOING ON THE ENTIRE SITE.  AS OF TODAY THE ON-SITE INFRASTRUCTURE IS IN.  THE BUILDING PERMITS HAVE BEEN ISSUED.  THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE A WEEK CONSIDER TO BE PHASE I WHICH ARE THE RESORT, CONFERENCE CENTER, LAGOON, SIR PARK NORTH DOES IT INCLUDE THE CONDO TOWERS THAT ARE DESIGNED TO BE BUILT ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROJECT.  THE FIRST PHASE INCLUDES THE HOTEL, GOONS AND PARK IS EXPECTED TO START THIS FALL.  SOME OF THE CAPITAL STAFF FUNDED THIS NUMBER SO THEY CAN GET THEIR FINAL PLANS READY FOR THAT. 
          SECOND PHASE WHICH IS REALLY DAYS 1B INCLUDES THE BIG RESORT 
          [01:20:06]
AND CONFERENCE CENTER AND IS EXPECT TO START WITHIN TWO YEARS AFTER THE START OF THE FIRST HOTEL.  I WANT TO SAY AGAIN THAT YOU WILL HEAR FROM THE DEVELOPERS AND THEY SPLIT ORIGINALLY TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY CAN GET THE NECESSARY CAPITAL AND THAT WILL ESSENTIALLY BE WHAT WE ARE VOTING ON TONIGHT.  SO, LET'S TALK ABOUT WHAT THE PROJECT IS ERIE FIRST OFF HIM A THE PROJECT FUND, THIS IS THE CURRENT EXISTING AGREEMENT AS IT NOW STANDS IN THE CITY IS EATING 50 PERCENT OF THE PROPERTY TAX PROPERTY FUND. 
          THE HOTEL LODGING TAXES WILL BE 6/7.  STATE REVENUE 100 PERCENT.  AT THE TIME OF THE AGREEMENT IT SAYS ANY EXCESS ABOVE THE AMOUNT THAT IS GOING TO BE FUNDED FOR THE CONFERENCE CENTER WE SHARED WITH THE DEVELOPER SUBJECT TO CITY APPROVAL.  IN OTHER WORDS WE ENVISION IT WOULD GO TO PAY OR AMENITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE SUCH THAT WE HAVE DOWN THERE. 
          THAT WOULD BE SHARED.  THE CITY HAVE TO APPROVE THAT.  THE DEVELOPER CONSTRUCTS THE PROJECT INCLUDING AMENITIES WITH 450 ROOMS.  IT DEDICATES ONE SURE FIRE STATION.  THE CITY WOULD MAINTAIN THE PERCENT OF THE PROPERTY TAX, 1/7 OF THE HOTEL LODGING, 100 PERCENT OF SALES TAX, 100 PERCENT OF MIXED BEVERAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPACT FEES, ROADWAY IMPACT FEES JUST TO CLARIFY THESE ARE PRIVATE ROADS.  THIS IS ANOTHER THING THAT THETHE DEVELOPER ASKED FOR.  THEY WILL HAVE A PUBLIC PURPOSE, IT'S IMPORTANT TO THEM THAT THESE ROADS BE EITHER.  THE CITY COMMITTED TO ASSURING REVENUE BONDS FOR THE CONFERENCE ENTER AND I HAVE ONE TYPE 13.4 MILLION TOWARD SPECIFIED OFF-SITE PUBLIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENT.  THERE WERE FIVE PROJECTS UNDER THAT FOUR OF THOSE HAVE BEEN BUILT AND WE HAVE ONE LESS PROJECT WHICH IS THE WATERLINE DOWN DELL ROCK.  THAT IS STILL YET TO BE DONE THE ONLY PROJECT LEFT.  SO, THE AMENDMENT TONIGHT WHAT IT DOES IS ON THE PROJECT FUND THE STATE REVENUES IT REMOVES THE DISCRETION OF THE CITY TO HAVE TO APPROVE THE REDEVELOPMENT FOR THE AMENITIES.  AGAIN STATE REVENUES WERE DESIGNED TO DO THIS AND YOU WILL HAVE TO REMEMBER GOING ASK SOME YEARS AGO THERE WAS EVEN A QUESTION TO WHETHER OR NOT THERE WOULD BE -THE ECONOMICS OF THE OBJECT WOULD BE ENOUGH TO USE ONCE OR A $50 MILLION CONFERENCE CENTER.  MOVE FORWARD SEVERAL YEARS WITH THE MARKET WE ARE IN NOW, THE PROJECT IS BELIEVED TO SUPPORT $80 MILLION IN BONDS AND REMEMBER, THAT IS JUST A PART AMOUNT TO BE ISSUED.  ON TOP OF THAT YOU HAVE THE INTEREST CARRY AS WELL AND WE WILL TALK ABOUT THAT IN JUST A SECOND.  SOME OF THE CHANGES? WE WOULD SHARE THE MIXED BEVERAGE SO THE CALCULATION FOR MIXED BEVERAGE TAXES OVER THE LIFE OF REMAINING LIFE OF THE TOURS THROUGH 2025 IS APPROXIMATELY $14 MILLION. THIS WOULD BENEFIT THE PROJECT IS $7 MILLION.  THE CITY WOULD STILL MAINTAIN 50 PERCENT.  WE WOULD ISSUE ROAD IMPACT FEES BUT AGAIN THE ROADS ARE GOING TO BE PRIVATE SO WE WILL NOT HAVE TO MAINTAIN THEM.  THE CITY WOULD CONTRIBUTE WATER IMPACT FEES WHICH IS DESIGNED TO SUPPORT THE DOLL ROCK LINE AND INFRASTRUCTURE.  AGAIN, THE CITY MAINTAINS A SALES TAX OF 100 PERCENT.  MAINTAIN SEWER IMPACT FEES OF 100 PERCENT. THE WATER IMPACT FEES WILL GO AND WE WOULD STILL HAVE 1/7 OF THE HOTEL LODGING.  AGAIN, WE WOULD INCREASE THE POTENTIAL AMOUNT THAT WE COULD ISSUE WITH REVENUE BONDS.  AGAIN, IT HAS TO BE SUPPORTED THE ECONOMICS OF THE PROJECT TO $82 MILLION AND 13 POINT $1 MILLION OF THE OFF-SITE PUBLIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENT.  I WANT TO TALK ABOUT WHAT THIS.  WHEN YOU LOOK AT A PROJECT OF THIS SIZE I HAVE OFTEN COINED THIS AS A CITY WITHIN US THAT HE, EVERYTHING THAT YOU WOULD WANT TO HAVE IN THIS PROJECT WILL BE ON SITE.  YOU WILL BE ABLE TO LIVE THERE AND NOT LEAVE.  YOU 
          [01:25:01]
CAN GO TO RESTAURANTS, BIOGAS, GO TO A CONVENIENCE STORE, ENTERTAINMENT WILL BE THERE. YOU WILL BE ABLE TO EXERCISE HER TO WALK AROUND WITH ALL THE DIFFERENT CHEERS.  7500 JOBS IS ANTICIPATED.  I THINK THAT IS SIGNIFICANT WHEN YOU CONSIDER A COMMUNITY OUR SIZE.  A ONE ONE BILLION DOLLAR CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROJECT UNDER BAYSIDE WAS EXPECTED TO BE $1 BILLION WITH NORTH AND SOUTH.  YOU'RE STILL ESTIMATING A PROJECT OF $1.1 BILLION JUST FOR THE SOUTH. 
          PROJECT REVENUES NOW, RANTED, THE SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL RECEIVE A BENEFIT IT FROM THIS AND SO WILL THE COUNTY.  THE CITY AND STATE TAX RESOURCES TOTAL $505 MILLION THROUGH 2035.  REASON THAT'S IMPORTANT IS BECAUSE THAT IS THE 20 YEAR PERIOD ENDING OF THE TOURS THAT WAS CREATED BACK IN 20 TEEN. 
          THOSE TAX SOURCES INCLUDE COPY, HOTEL, NAILS AND ASKED BEVERAGE.  THE CITY OF ROWLETT WILL RETAIN $111 MILLION DURING THAT PERIOD.  SO, THAT SAME 20 YEAR PERIOD THROUGH 2035 THE CITY WILL RETAIN $111 MILLION THE STATE WILL RETAIN $161 MILLION.  SO, JUST FOR EFFICACIOUS AND, THE STATE CONTRIBUTION TO THIS PROJECT, I'M SORRY I HAVE THAT ON THE CHEAT SHEET, $143 MILLION THE STATE WILL STILL GET THE REVENUE ABOUT 142 MILLION OF STATE REVENUES WILL BE USED FOR THIS AND ESSENTIALLY THAT IS HOW WE ARE GOING TO BE FINANCING THE CONFERENCE CENTER PLUS A LOT OF THE AMENITIES THAT WE DESIRE.  OUR WASHING THAT WE ATTRIBUTE TO THIS PROJECT IS $89 MILLION AND AGAIN IT IS TO ENSURE THAT YOUR ADDING THE AMENITIES THAT WE WANT.  OVERALL THE PROJECT WILL RETAIN OVER 200 MILLION AND THAT IS TO GO TO HELP PAY FOR THE CONFERENCE CENTER, THE AMENITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE. 
          I DO WANT TO TALK ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS BEYOND 2035.  ONCE WE GET PAST THIS 20 YEAR PHASE THE PROJECT IS BUILT OUT, IT IS OPERATING WE ARE ALL HAPPY WITH IT, THE CITY OF ROWLETT ANNUAL REVENUES THIS IS NOT INFLATED THIS IS TODAY'S DOLLARS.  THERE IS NO INFLATIONARY IMPACT BUILT OUT BUT IN TODAY'S DOLLARS IT WOULD BE 16.9 MILLION.  WE WOULD ALSO START SHARING SOME OF THE REVENUES THE CITY OF DALLAS.  THAT IS TO PERCENT OF PROPERTY HOTEL OCCUPANT IN THE CITY WOULD ALWAYS RETAIN 100 PERCENT OF SALES TAX.  $4.8 MILLION.  OUR ONGOING REVENUE ONCE THIS IS BUILT OUT IS RIGHT AT 17 MILLION.  I WOULD GUESS INFLATION AT THAT TIME IT WOULD VERY WELL BE NORTH OF 20 MILLION BUT FOR RIGHT NOW OUR ESTIMATE IS $16.9 MILLION. 
          THIS IS A SIGNIFICANT ECONOMIC PROJECT.  A LEGACY PROJECT ROWLETT AND THERE'S A LOT AT THE.  MUST TALK ABOUT THE SPECIFICS OF THE PROJECT.  WHAT WAS IMPORTANT TO THE DEVELOPER AS THEY CAME TO US LAST FALL WAS THE PHASING OF THIS PROJECT.  THE PHASING OF THE PROJECT IS REALLY IMPORTANT TO BE ABLE TO SECURE THE CAPITAL THAT THEY NEEDED TO SECURE TO BE ABLE TO MAKE THE PROJECT HAPPEN.  OUR PLAN AT THAT TIME OR HOURLY IS THAT PHASE ONE A WILL INCLUDE AGAIN THE LAGOON, THE SURF PARK, THE CONFERENCE CENTER IN THE FIRST THING BELIEVED TO BE AN OFFICE BUILDING.  AS THE MARKET HAS CHANGED AND THAT WAS ALLUDED TO EARLIER, THE MARKET HAS CHANGED AND SO IT WAS BELIEVED THAT IF THEY SPLIT PHASE I UP INTO DAYS ONE AND BE THEY COULD CAPITALIZE AND ENHANCE THE ECONOMICS OF IT QUICKER BY DOING THE SMALLER HOTEL FIRST AS OPPOSED TO THE BIGGER HOTEL. SO IT INCLUDES ADDING PARTICIPATION.  WE APPROACHED BOTH DALLAS AND ROCKWALL 
          [01:30:02]
COUNTY.  IF THEY AGREE TO THAT THAT WILL GO INTO THE PROJECT. 
          WE ADDED LANGUAGE TO THE DECK WATERLINE.  THE ONE THING THAT HAS NOT CHANGED IS THE CITY WILL RECEIVE IT $13.4 MILLION. 
          MY CONTRIBUTION WILL COME BACK OVER TIME IT OUTLINES THE CITY WILL HIRE A PARTY UNITY TO DO THE CIVIL THING AND FIRE PLAN AGAIN IS A 80.  I DON'T WANT TO HIRE A BUNCH OF PEOPLE THAT I WILL HAVE TO LAY OFF IN THREE YEARS SO IT MAKES SENSE TO HAVE A THIRD PARTY DO THIS.  6.5 ACRES OF A DIVISION.  WHAT WE ARE AFTER IS THE TRADEMARK. THE BRAND.  CRYSTAL IS WHAT WE ARE TALKING ABOUT.  WHAT THIS PERSON ASKED US FOR HIS FLEXIBILITY IN TERMS OF WHO WOULD BUILD THIS WATER CHURCH AND THAT IS THE REASON WE ARE PROPOSING TO CHANGE THE AGREEMENT.  THAT IS THE FLEXIBILITY.  STILL 6.5 ACRES. 
          WE NOW KNOW WHERE WE WOULD PLACE THE PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE FACILITY.  AS A PART OF THIS PROJECT THE 21 ACRE WE KNOW WHERE THAT WILL BE IN THE OFF-SITE BOAT RAMP I WANT TO CLARIFY BECAUSE THAT WAS BROUGHT UP AS WELL.  THIS WAS A REQUEST ORIGINALLY BY THE DEVELOPER THAT IF THE CITY WAS INTERESTED IN BUILDING AND OFFRAMP SOMEWHERE ELSE THEY WOULD CONTRIBUTE TO $250,000 OF THAT.  THE MARINA HAS PLEDGED TO REENTER $50,000 FOR THAT SAME PROJECT.  IT MIGHT NOT HAPPEN.  BUT IF THE CITY DECIDED IT WAS APPEALING AND WANTED TO DO THAT, THEY WOULD PHAVE A COMMITMENT FROM BOTH TH MARINA AND THE SAPPHIRE BAY DEVELOPER TO CONTRIBUTE UP TO $600,000.  AGAIN, THAT IS SOMETHING FOR US TO THAT ARE IN THE FUTURE.  THE AMENDMENT TO THE HOTELS.  AGAIN THIS IS THE CLARIFICATION BETWEEN THE SIZE OF THE HOTELS, THE NUMBER OF ROOMS AND AGAIN WE ARE WITH THE DEVELOPERS PROPOSING TO HOTELS AND WHAT THE AGREEMENT DOES IS GIVE THEM STABILITY IN TERMS OF WHICH ONE WOULD GO FIRST. AGAIN, I WANT TO MAKE THIS CLEAR.  THE CITY OF ROWLETT IMPETUS FOR THIS IS THAT IF THE SMALLER ONE WAS FIRST IN THE LARGER FACILITY WAS NOT BUILT WITHIN THE TWO YEARS THAT WE ARE SPEAKING TO THE CITY WOULD NOT CONTRIBUTE TOWARDS ISSUING REVENUE BOND.  THIS IS SO WE CAN MAKE SURE THE ENTIRE VISION IS COMPLETED.  THAT IS WHY YOU ARE DOING THIS.  THE CITY IS VERY CONCERNED THAT SPLITTING THE SOUTH AND STARTING WITH ONE OVER THE OTHER WOULD ENSURE THAT THE OTHER ONE WOULD NOT BE BUILT OR MAY NOT BE FELT AND WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE PUT ENOUGH DISINCENTIVE IN THEIR SO THAT THEY WOULD WANT TO DO THIS.  AGAIN, IF THEY DON'T THIS REVENUE IS A HUGE PART OF THIS PROJECT.  AGAIN, $143 MILLION IN STATE REVENUE AND THEY WOULD BE GIVING UP A BIG AMOUNT OF THAT WITH NOT MOVING FORWARD WITH THE SECOND HOTEL. 
          WE WOULD ISSUE BONDS INITIALLY AT THE PHASING HOLDS OUT IF THEY DECIDE THEY WANT TO DO PHASE I A THEY WANT TO DO A SMALLER HOTEL WE WOULD DO UP TO 32 MILLION.  RIGHT NOW IT IS HOVERING AROUND 26 $3 MILLION AND REMEMBER THAT WOULD BE PART.  INTEREST WOULD BE MORE THAN THAT WITH THE INTEREST. 
          AND THEN ALSO THE PROVISION IN THERE THAT THE SECOND ONE WOULD HAVE TO BEGIN WITHIN TWO YEARS OF THAT PROJECT AS WELL. 
          FINANCING.  WE WOULD BE ENVISIONING WITH THIS TWO INSTANCES TOTALING $82 MILLION. AGAIN, THE ECONOMICS HAVE TO WORK WITH THIS.  THESE ARE REVENUE BOND.  I WANT TO MAKE THIS DISTINCTION.  IN A GO BOND OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, THE CITY PUTS ITS FULL FAITH AND CREDIT BEHIND IT AND THAT IF THE TAXES AREN'T THERE TO PAY FOR IT WE FIND THE MONEY TO PAY FOR IT.  IN A REVENUE BONDS WHAT IT MEANS IS THE REVENUE 
          [01:35:02]
FROM THE PROJECT IS GOING TO GO TO PAY FOR IT.  IF THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN, FIRST, THEY GO TO THE RESERVES SET FOR THAT BOND AND PULL FROM IT.  SECONDLY, THEY GO DOWN THE LIST ON HOW THEY ARE GOING BE FINANCED.  A FULL CREDIT OF THE CITY IN GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS WILL HAVE THE ABSOLUTE HIGHEST ON TRADING AND THEIR WORK THE LOWEST INTEREST RATE.  AND A REVENUE BOND IS BASED ON THE PLEDGE OF THOSE REVENUES MEANING THAT THE BOND RATING MIGHT NOT BE AS HIGH, THE INTEREST RATE MIGHT BE HIGHER BUT IT'S ALL ABOUT HOW YOU MAKE THESE PROJECTS WORK. 
          THE CITY WOULD NOT NECESSARILY DO A FULL FAITH CREDIT BOND ON THIS PROJECT.  THE MAJOR CHANGE IN TERMS OF THE THESE CONTRIBUTION THIS IS THAT WE WENT TO THE BEVERAGE TAX THE WATER IMPACT FEE, PARTICULARLY TO HELP DALROCK WATERLINE PROJECT AND ROAD IMPACT FEES HERE THE CITY WOULD HAVE TO MAINTAIN THOSE FUNDS.  COUNSEL, THAT IS THE PRESENTATION.  I THINK WE HAVE ANSWERED A LOT OF THESE QUESTIONS.  I DO WANT TO DEVELOP OR TO TO SOME RECENT INFORMATION THAT I RELEVANT AND IMPORTANT AND THAT WE WILL COUNSEL MAY HAVE.  THIS IS KIM DONAHUE DEVELOPER OF SAPPHIRE BAY.  WE HAVE SOME GREAT THINGS GOING ON AND TO HIS POINT THIS IS ABOUT BUILDING X ABILITY AND THE PROJECT IS NOT CHANGING THE VISION.  FOR US IT IS A PHASE ON THE PROJECT AND INCLUDES THE LAGOON, ELTON AND EXCUSE RESTAURANT AND RETAIL.  REALLY, IF WE WERE TO INCLUDE PHASE I AND PHASE II AND ONE CAPITAL STACK IT IS $600 MILLION.  OVER THE GOT US HERE TO FINANCE A 500 ROOM RESORT IN THE BALANCE OF IT IN ENTERTAINMENT AND COST TALLY, IT IS A CHALLENGE IN TODAY'S MARKET.  IN DUE TO THE IMPACT OF COVID AND WHAT HAD ON THE INDUSTRY.  THIS PROVIDES US FLEXIBILITY TO DO PHASE I 300 MILLION OF THE SURF VILLAGE, LAGOON AND SHOW FOUNTAIN AND 50,000 SQUARE FEET OF MIXED-USE.  PHASE II WOULD FOLLOW SHORTLY AFTER AND BE A 512 DESTINATION HOTEL BY HYATT. 
          THAT IS WHAT WE ARE ASKING FOR FOR THE DEVELOPMENT.  SOME GOOD NEWS, CAPITAL MARKETS HAVE CHANGED A LITTLE BIT AND AS OF LAST WEEK SO, STILL WANT TO KEEP THE FLEXIBILITY IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SET ON THAT A 500 ROOM HOTEL IN PHASE I.  ANY QUESTIONS?  'S IT IS EXCITING.  WE CLOSED ON A THIRD HOTEL LAST WEEK THAT WILL BE ANNOUNCED NEXT MONTH.  IT'S A FUN CONCEPT AND IT WILL BE 130 KEYS.  A FUN ADDITION TO SAPPHIRE BAY.  THE TOTAL KEY COUNT IS 822 AND THAT WILL ALL 
          BE STARTED NEXT YEAR. >>  THAT IS AWESOME. 
          [APPLAUSE] ANY QUESTIONS FOR KENT?  BEFORE WE OPEN UP FOR COMMENT I TOLD YOU TO KEEP THAT SIGN HANDY.  DO YOU WANT TO BRING THE SIGN?  I'M SERIOUS. THE SIGN UP AND SET IT RIGHT 
          HERE BELOW ME. >>  CAN WE GET A PICTURE? 
          >>  SET IT RIGHT THERE FOR ME. OTHERWISE I WOULD PUT IT HERE. 
          I'M SURE NOBODY WANTS TO LOOK AT MY FACE.  I WILL KICK US OFF.  THIS HAS BEEN A LONG JOURNEY.  THIS COUNSEL RIGHT HERE AND EVERYBODY SITTING ON IT AND THOUGHT OF YOU IN THE AUDIENCE AND AT HOME THAT ARE WATCHING DID THAT RIGHT THERE, THERE IS A REASON THAT WE ARE SITTING HERE RIGHT NOW.  I CAN TELL YOU UNEQUIVOCALLY AND MAYOR TAMMY BASTION WOULD SAY THE SAME THING BECAUSE SHE WAS PART, 95 PERCENT OF THESE NEGOTIATIONS AND IF MARK WAS HERE HE WOULD TELL YOU HE HE WALKED OUT OF HERE VERY UNHAPPY.  WE NEVER, EVER WAVERED FROM WHAT THE VISION WAS FOR THIS FOR SAPPHIRE BAY. 
          [01:40:01]
EVER.  BUT IT IS $1.1 BILLION DEAL.  THOSE DON'T HAPPEN IN A VACUUM.  THIS ISN'T BUILDING A QUALITY SUITE OR A HOME.  1.1 WILLIAM DOLLAR DEAL.  AND THEN YOU THROW INTO IT COVID, INTUIT RECORD INFLATION.  THE STUFF THAT IS GOING ON, EVERYTHING HAPPENING IN THE WORLD THAT IS CRAZY ON.  UNCERTAINTY OF THE MARKET AND WE STILL HAVE THE ABILITY TO HIT THE GROUND RUNNING IN THE FACT THAT BE ABLE TO, HEIRS WILL POP UP OUT OF THEIR EVERYTHING IS DONE. IF YOU HAVE AROUND DON'T WANT 'S ARE IN, YOU LOOK AT THE ENGINEERING AND THINK OF WHAT THE ENGINEERING TAKES TO FEEDWATER,, FIBER, ELECTRIC, UNDERNEATH 30 HOWDY THEY HAVE TO GO?  700. 
          >>  700 FEET POINT THEY CAME OUT ONE MILLIMETER OF WHERE THEY SAID THEY WOULD COME OUT ON THE OTHER SIDE.  THESE ARE THE THINGS THAT THE RESIDENT DON'T GET TO HEAR ABOUT ON A DAY-TO-DAY BASIS AS WE HAVE TO DO THE BEHIND CLOSED DOORS.  HE MENTIONED IT IS OTHER DEALS GOING ON IN OTHER CITIES.  WE HAVE TO PROTECT OUR INVESTMENT BECAUSE THESE ARE SO BIG.  WHAT WAS OUR SALES TAX AND PROPERTY TAX REVENUE FOR THE BUDGET? WASN'T IT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF 38 MILLION NOT COUNTING THE 
          FEES AND ALL THAT? >>  DALE'S TAX JUST FOR THE 
          CITY? >>  LAST YEAR SALES TAX 
          PROPERTY TAX WHAT WAS THAT? >>  I THINK WE BROKE EIGHT OR 9 MILLION.  IT WAS A HUGE INCREASE. 
          >>  I JUST LOOKED IT UP.  I THINK THERE WAS 38 MILLION WITH SALES TAX AND PROPERTY TAX.  IF YOU LOOK AT THE END OF THIS PROJECT DEAL WILL BE OVER $16 MILLION.  ABOUT THAT, THAT IS HALF OF WHAT OUR CURRENT OPERATING BUDGET IS.  THIS ONE PROJECT.  WE WERE NEVER GOING TO COMPROMISE ON THIS PROJECT. 
          INFLATION ADDED TO A LOT OF THIS.  YOU HAVE TO RUN A BIG WATERLINE TO SERVE A $1.1 BILLION PROJECTS.  THAT WENT UP EXPONENTIALLY IN COST.  WE ALL HAVE TO BEAR THAT.  THEY TOOK ON A LOT OF COST AND WE SAID WE HAVE TO TO HELP WITH THAT TO BE ABLE TO FEED THIS OTHERWISE WE WOULD HAVE DONE WHAT ALL OF YOU ARE AFRAID OF.  THE ONLY OTHER OPTION WAS TO START CUTTING AMENITIES AND NO ONE IN THIS ROOM WANTED TO DO IT TO START CUTTING AMENITIES.  WE HAVE TO FIND ANOTHER WAY TO FUND IT. 
          THE GREAT THING IS AS THIS PROJECT STARTED TO TAKE OFF THE ECONOMICS HAVE GOTTEN THAT ARE THE INTEREST HAS GOTTEN OUT THERE THEY'VE DONE A GREAT JOB MARKETING AND THERE'S GOING TO BE SOME REALLY COOL ANNOUNCEMENT COMING OUT THAT I CAN'T SPOIL THAT YOU GUYS LEFT TO SEE.  CRANES WILL START HITTING IN THE ECONOMICS OF THIS MARKETING THAT ARE BETTER EVERY DAY.  SO WE NEVER WANT WAVERED ON WHAT DECISION WAS. 
          IT JUST TOOK A LITTLE BIT OF TIME TO GET THERE AND I THINK EVERYONE WILL BE AS EXCITED AS WE ARE ONCE IT STARTS GOING. 
          >>  QUICK POINT TO THE MATH PHASE I IS 1.1 BILLION THE 
          WHOLE PROJECT IS TO BILLION. >>  BOOM.  YOU SEE, I JUST GOT 
          CORRECT DID. >>  WE ARE PUTTING IN 600 AND PHASE I AND WE GOT A LOT MORE WORK TO DO. 
          >>  SO, I APPRECIATE ALL THE CITIZENS THAT HELPED US GET TO THIS POINT AND HELP US FIGHT THIS.  I THINK ALL OF THE COUNCILMEMBERS, MARTHA AND TAMMY WHO WAS OUT THERE PLAYING PICKLE BALL IN ARIZONA WHO FOUGHT FOR US TO GET TO THIS POINT WE ARE EXCITED TO GET MOVING.  COUNSEL, QUESTIONS? ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS.  ALL RIGHT.  I WILL 
          ENTERTAIN A MOTION. >>  I MOVE WE ACCEPT ITEM 8A. 
          >>  I HAVE A MOTION TO I HAVE A SECOND?  COUNCILMEMBER PAMELA BELL?  ALL RIGHT WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND DO WE HAVE ANY DISCUSSION?  ALL RIGHT, CAN YOU PLEASE CALL A VOTE?  THAT PASSES 5-0.  THANK YOU SO MUCH. WE LOOK FORWARD TO GETTING 
          THINGS GOING. >>>  BRIAN, ARE YOU OKAY IF WE DO THE OTHER BAYSIDE STUFF AND MOVE THIS AROUND OR DO WE NEED? 
          [Items 8D - 8F]
          [01:45:10]
WE ARE GOING TO JUMP AHEAD A LITTLE BIT WERE GOING TO MOVE SOME THINGS AROUND.  GOING TO DO ITEM 8D FIRST WHICH IS CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION TO AN ORDINANCE AND REQUEST OF SAPPHIRE BAY LANDHOLDING LLC IN REVISING THE REGULATION PLAN TO REVISE REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO PARKING LOTS, DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITIES, TILTING ENTRANCES TRAIL LIGHTING, SIDEWALKS, SIGNAGE AND GAS PUMPS ON A 115.32 ACRE SITE LOCATED IN THE SAPPHIRE BAY PENINSULA. 
          >>  GOOD EVENING COUNSEL.  WE HAVE FOR THE EASE OF PRESENTATION, I WAS HOPING TO PERCENT COLLECTIVELY THE THREE ITEMS SCHEDULED OR SAPPHIRE BAY WHICH IS THE REGULATING PLAN AND THEN THE MAJOR WARRANT DELIVERING TO THE EAST SIDE HOMES.  AS WELL AS THE MAJOR WARRANT TO THE RESTAURANT AND I WILL PRESENTED ALL COMPREHENSIVELY AND THERE AFTER YOU CAN TAKE ACTION ON IT INDIVIDUALLY IF THE CHAIR AND 
          COUNSEL CHOOSES. >>  LET ME READ THEM ALL TO THE RECORD.  AND THEN WE CAN VOTE ON THE MEXICO.  ITEM EIGHT CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION PUBLIC WHAT CAN YOU DO ONE CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE AND REQUEST I SAPPHIRE BAY LAND HOLDINGS LLC FOR MAJOR RESTAURANT TO FACADE GLAZING REQUIREMENTS AND ALLOW FOR SINGLE-STORY BUILDINGS IN A 2.6 ACRE SITE LOCATED 40 FEET NORTH WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF MACON ELYSE DRIVE AND KATIE DRIVE IN THE SAPPHIRE BAY PENINSULA.  CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING APPROVING MAJOR WARRANTS TO PROVIDE STOOP ENTRIES, SIDEWALK LOCATIONS ON A 2.9 THREE ACRE SITE ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF MARKETPLACE AND A PORTION OF STREET AND SAPPHIRE BAY PENINSULA.  ALL RIGHT.  THANK YOU MUNAL 
          MULLIDAD. >>  GOOD EVENING COUNSEL. 
          THANK YOU FOR READING ALL THOSE ITEMS INTO THE RECORD.  I WILL TRY AND FIND YOU A SYNOPSIS FROM A GRAND RESPECT FOR EACH CASE AND THEN THROUGH THAT I WILL WALK YOU THROUGH THE REQUESTED AMENDMENT AND MAJOR WARRANT.  THERE WITH ME AS I TRY TO WALK YOU THROUGH WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH THE SITE.  AS YOU CAN SEE WHAT IS ON THE SCREEN IN FRONT OF YOU THERE ARE THREE REQUESTS.  ONE IS TO AMEND THE REGULATING PLAN.  AND ASSOCIATED WITH THAT MAJOR WARRANT TO WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE LAKESIDE TRAIL.  AND THEN FOLLOWING THAT FOR ITEMS TWO AND THREE THOSE WOULD BE ADDRESSED AS THEY RELATE TO THE MAJOR WARRANT FROM A SITE SPECIAL PLANNING ASPECT.  THE REGULATING PLAN AMENDMENTS ARE CIVIC FIRST OFF, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.  BASICALLY THE APPLICANT HAS REVISED OR REFINED LIMIT TO THE LANDSCAPING OF THE OPEN SPACE AND A NEW PROGRAM AND THAT WOULD BE REFERRED TO AS PHASE I.  ADDITIONALLY THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REALIGNED PORTIONS OF THE TRAIL AND I WILL. 
          >> COUNCILMEMBER:  THAT. REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR PROVIDING LIGHTING ALONG THE TRAIL, ESTABLISH TENANT SIGNAGE CRITERIA THIS WOULD BE PART OF WHAT WAS ADDED TO THE AMENDMENTS OR THE ADDENDUM TO THE APPROVED MASTER SIGN PACKAGE FOR FREE STANDING PSIGNAGE AND ALLOW ADDITIONAL USE WITH AN INCREASED NUMBER OF GAS PUMPS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT.  SO, AS YOU MENTIONED I TALKED ABOUT PHASE I LANDSCAPING COMPONENT AND ELEMENT TO THE SCREEN IN FRONT OF YOU REFLECTS TWO DRAWINGS ONE IS THE APPROVED PHASING PLAN AND ONE IS THE PROPOSED PHASING PLAN.  THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO MODIFY WHAT YOU SEE IN PURPLE AS PHASE I AND LOOK AT THE PROPOSED OPTION IN PHASE I THAT IS SHOWN IN PURPLE, HERE.  THIS IS THE FIRST PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT. 
          THIS WILL MIMIC OR BE INSTALLED ALMOST IN TIME OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE TOWNHOMES ALONG HERE.  THIS IS THE DIFFERENCE THAT WERE REFERRING TO.  THS IS THE PROGRAM FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THEIR UNITIZED PACKAGE. 
          ADDITIONALLY, ORIGINALLY THE REGULATING PLAN REFLECTED A TRAIL SYSTEM THAT HUGGED THE PERIMETER OF THE SHORELINE THAT YOU CANSEE RIGHT HERE WITH FUTURE ACCESS ALONG AND ACROSS 
          [01:50:05]
THE BRIDGE AND INTO ADJACENT DEVELOPMENTS INTO THE BAYSIDE DEVELOPMENT HERE THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THAT THIS ALIGNMENT ALTERED SPECIFICALLY IN THIS AREA YOU CAN SEE IN THE BOX AND IN REFERENCE TO THIS ALIGNMENT ALONG HERE.  THE APPLICANT INSTEAD IS PROPOSING TO RELOCATE THE TRAIL ALONG HERE.  THESE ARE PROPOSED TOWNHOMES ALONG THE EASTERN PERIMETER.  THIS IS THE SHORELINE ORIGINALLY WHAT YOU SEE GREEN WAS THAT TRAIL ALIGNMENT.  AS MENTIONED AND AS WE HAVE DISCUSSED IN THE PAST AND AS YOU CAN SEE SHOWN IN GREEN IS THE WALKING BY THE PEDESTRIAN TRAIL AND BASICALLY THE GOAL WAS TO MAXIMIZE THE AMENITY OF THE LAKE AND MINIMIZE RIGHT-OF-WAY CROSSINGS FURTHERMORE TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF THE USERS, THE PEDESTRIANS AND BIKERS.  I TRIED TO EXPLAIN THROUGH THE DRAWING ON YOUR RIGHT IS BEING PROPOSED AND WHAT YOU SEE IN ORANGE IS THE NEW LOCATION OF THE TRAIL WHICH IS BEING PUSHED INTO THE INTERIOR OF THE SITE ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE TOWNHOME.  BASED ON THIS ALLOCATION THE POST TRAIL ROUTE WOULD BE IN CONFLICT WITH THE TWO DRIVEWAY CUT LACEY AS RED ARROWS.  BASICALLY, THESE ARE THE RED ARROWS THAT I'M REFERRING TO IN THE DRIVEWAY. 
          TO ENSURE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY TO ENSURE THE MINIATURIZATION OF THE PROGRAM THAT WAS ORIGINALLY IN VISION STAFF RECOMMEND THIS 
          CHANGE NOT BE APPROVED. >> MAYOR:  I KNOW YOU HAVE A LOT TO COVER SO I APOLOGIZE IF I JUMP IN, IS THAT OKAY?  I KNOW YOU'RE GOING TO COVER A LOT SO I WANT TO NOT MISS QUESTION THAT ANYBODY MIGHT HAVE.  WASN'T THERE ANOTHER ALIGNMENT AS PART OF THIS TRAIL AS WELL THAT WAS GOING TO ESSENTIALLY CUT WHERE IT WENT AROUND TO TRY TO CROSS WHERE THAT REDLINE WAS.  WHEN IT WENT ADJACENT TO WHERE THE PROMENADE IS AND WHERE THE RESORT WILL BE? 
          >>  I'M GOING TO BACK UP AND SHOW YOU THE ORIGINAL ALIGNMENT AND THEN WHAT THE PROPOSAL IS. THIS IS THE PROMENADE WHERE YOU HAVE THE HOTEL AND THIS WILL BE REALIZED.  IT'S AT THIS POINT YOU WOULD RECOGNIZE THE DIFFERENCE WHERE THE REALIGNMENT WOULD JOG IN THIS MANNER AND NOT HUG THE 
          SHORELINE AROUND HERE. >>  I WAS THINKING CAN'T YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO SPEAK TO IT THERE'S GOING TO BE A TRAIL SECTION IT'S GOING TO RUN FROM ESSENTIALLY THE EAST AND WEST OF WHERE THE CONDO UNITS WOULD BE IN BETWEEN THE LAGOON, PUBLIC TRAIL SECTION, IS THAT CORRECT? 
          >>  NO. >>  OKAY.  IN BETWEEN THERE THERE WOULD NOT BE A CONNECTION? 
          >>  THE TOP LEFT IS WHERE THE TRAIL CUT UP. 
          >>  OKAY. >>  THE APPLICANT IS ALSO REQUESTING THE INCLUSION OF A MASTER TENANT SIGN PACKAGE AS PART OF THE MASTER SIGNAGE COMPONENT.  THE PROPOSAL, CONSCIOUS IS NOT THE RIGHT WORD BUT IS VERY IN LINE WITH THE LOCATION OF THE FACILITIES THAT ARE BEING PROPOSED, THE USES BEING POSED AND AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE SCREEN THE APPLICANT HAS DIVIDED SIGNIFICANT DISTRICTS AS IT RELATES TO THE SIGN PACKAGE AND MAXIMIZING, FOR IN THE END, THIS AREA IS THE HIGHWAY AREA THEY CALL THE HIGHWAY DISTRICTS OF THE SIGNAGE ALONG HERE DEPENDING ON THE TOPOGRAPHY WOULD BE DIFFERENT.  THE APPLICANT IS ALSO SHOWING YOU SOME RESIDENTIAL AREAS AND THE SIGNAGE IN THESE AREAS IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE LAGOON DISTRICT AND WOULD BE VERY AWARE IN THIS TIME CONSCIOUS OF ALL OF THOSE FACTORS.  THE SIZE, THE LOCATION, THE HEIGHT, THE LETTERING, ALL THAT IS DETAILED IN THE SIGN PACKAGE THAT IS ATTACHED TO YOUR PACKAGE IN THE REPORT.  SO, THIS TENANT SIGNED PACKAGES DOES CREATE THOSE MINIMUMS AND ESTABLISHES MAC AMONG THAT CANNOT REFLECT THE CHARACTER OF THAT SPECIFIC SIGN DISTRICT THAT I SPOKE TO.  CARLOS AND OUR TEAM ESPECIALLY CARLOS HAS BEEN A LARGE AMOUNT OF TIME REVIEWING THE ELEMENT AND ENSURE THAT THEY ARE IF NOT BEING WITH THE SAME BASE CODE 
          [01:55:04]
BUT A TAD MORE RESTRICTIVE IN SOME RESPECTS AS WELL.  PERHAPS SECTION OF THE HIGHWAY DISTRICT THAT WE ALSO HAVE TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE SIZE OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND USES THAT WILL BE ESTABLISHED HERE.  THERE ARE A FEW MAJOR WARRANT THERE BEING REQUESTED OR AMENDMENT TO THIS THING MORE AND AS YOU KNOW THIS IS A LARGE-SCALE DEVELOPMENT AND YOU HAVE TO IDENTIFY THE USE IMMEDIATELY.  IT MIGHT NOT HAPPEN BUT AS THE SITE EVOLVED AND MATURES INTO REALIZING DEVELOPMENT UNITS ARE REALIZED. 
          IN THIS INSTANCE THE ORIGINAL REGULATING PLAN WOULD ALLOW A RESTAURANT WITH GAS PUMPS.  THE APPLICANT HAS COME OVER WITH USER AND THAT USER IS A CONVENIENCE STORE AND THAT USE BE ALLOWED.  IT IS NOT ALLOWED IN THE HOME BASE CODE AND WOULD FIRE A MAJOR WARRANT TO ALLOW THE USE.  ADDITIONALLY, THE APPLICANT WOULD WANT TO INCREASE THE ALREADY APPROVED PUMPS FROM 12 TO 16.  IN A NUTSHELL THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THAT THE EXISTING MAJOR WARRANT TO ALLOW GAS PUMPS IN A RESTAURANT BE AMENDED TO ALLOW A STORE AS WELL AND TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF PUMPS FROM 12 TO 16.  THE STAFF DOES RECOMMEND UNFAVORABLY FOR THIS MAJOR WARRANT WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.  THAT THIS DEVELOPMENT IS SCREENED FROM ALL RIGHT-OF-WAY'S FROM BUILDINGS THAT THEY BE BEHIND THE STRUCTURE TO WHERE THE FRONT CONSTITUTES A STREET OR OPEN SPACE AND PERMITTED FOR ONE USER AND NOT DIVIDED AMONGST SEVERAL USERS.  AN ADDITIONAL PROPOSED MAJOR WARRANT IS RELATED TO THE LIGHTING THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A WAIVER TO PROVIDE THE REQUIREMENTS ALONG THE HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL AND WHAT THIS MEANS IS THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING NOT TO PROVIDE LIGHTING ALONG THE HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL.  HOWEVER, THE BASECOAT IS CLEAR THAT ALL DEVELOPMENTS ARE HIRED FOR THE PLAN CONFIRMING THE DEVELOPMENT MAKES ALL THE LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS FROM A LAYER AND HEIGHT CANDLE FOR SIDEWALKS, PARKING AREAS AND OPEN.  IF APPROVED STAFF HAVE NO NEED OF VERIFYING MINIMUM LIGHT LEVEL ALONG THE TRAIL INTO SEE WHAT THAT LEVEL IS.  AT THIS STAGE STAFF DOES NOT RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS MAJOR WARRANT. WHAT I JUST DISCUSSED, COUNSEL IS THAT THE REGULATING PLAN AMENDMENT AND THE ASSOCIATED MAJOR WARRANT TO THOSE.  WE ARE NOW GOING TO MOVE FORWARD AND TALK ABOUT THE EAST TOWNHOMES AND THE REQUESTED FEATURE WANTS TO THOSE.  THE FIRST MAJOR WARRANT IS TO REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR A STUPID ENTRY. IN YOUR STAFF REPORT, COUNSEL IN YOUR PACKET, THOSE SPECIFIC ARTICLES AND SECTIONS ARE REFERENCE.  REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT ON THE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE STREET AND REDUCE THE SPACING REQUIREMENT FOR TREES FROM 25 TO 30 FEET ON CENTER.  WHAT YOU CAN SEE ON THE SCREEN IN FRONT OF YOU HIGHLIGHTED IN RED ARE THE PROPOSED TOWNHOMES.  IT'S APPROXIMATELY 2.9 ACRE TRACT. 
          THE AVERAGE LOT DIMENSION I WILL PROVIDE THIS DETAIL 35 FEET IN WIDTH AND THE PROPOSED DEPTH FOR THE LOT IS 60 FEET. 
          THESE ARE THE LOT RIGHT HERE AND THE BUILDING ENVELOPES THAT YOU CAN SEE ALONG HERE JUST FOR EDIFICATION, THIS IS THE TRAIL SYSTEM THAT WOULD BE REALIGNED THAT WE ARE REFERRING TO.  AS PART OF THIS REQUEST, AS IT RELATES TO THE EAST TOWNHOMES, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THAT THE REQUIRED SIDEWALK ALONG HERE NOT BE REQUIRED. THESE UNITS HAVE DRIVEWAYS AND GARAGES SETBACK BETWEEN AND 20 FROM THE CURB HERE THERE IS A DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT IS UNDER REVIEW AND PENDING APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT TO THE REGULATING PLAN AS IT RELATES TO THE TRAIL AND THE 10 FOOT WIDE HIKE AND I TRAIL WOULD BE LOCATED ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE STREET. ADDITIONALLY, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THEIR PERMIT TO WAIVE THE STOOP REQUIREMENT A MINIMUM OF THREE SIX INCH STEPS COMING TO A PORCH FRONT DOOR REQUIRED PER THE FORM BASECOAT THE APPLICANT HAS KNIGHTED THAT THERE EXISTING GRADE CONDITIONS WOULD MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO ACHIEVE THIS RETIRED PHILLY REQUIREMENT.  BECAUSE OF THE PROXIMITY OF THESE HOMES OR BUILDINGS TO THE STREET THE STAFF IS AMENABLE TO HAVE AT GRADE REQUIREMENT AND REMOVE THE STOOP REQUIREMENT.  THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE 
          [02:00:02]
SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE TOWNHOME I JUST AGENDA EARLIER. 
          JUSTIFICATION IS THE FRONT ENTRY ALIGNMENT OF THESE MAKES THE SIDEWALKS AND ACHIEVABLE WITH THE GRADE.  A PRIMARY OR KEY AGREEMENT FOR PEDESTRIAN MOVE IS SIDEWALKS.  THEY ARE VERY AS IT RELATES TO NOT ONLY THE WARM BASECOAT DESIGN AND ENTICING A DEVELOPMENT HERE WITHOUT ACCESS TO THE SIDEWALK OR A TRAIL TO THE REAR RESIDENTS OF THESE UNITS WOULD BE CROSS CROSS A STREET FOR THE VESTRY AND NETWORK THAT I TALK TO YOU ABOUT THIS EARLIER. AFRICAN SIDEWALKS PROVIDED IN THE SITE HAVE AN APPROPRIATE GRADE TO RECOGNIZE SIDEWALKS. 
          TREE SPACING REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS IS THE LAST OF THE MAJOR WARRANT RELATED TO THE TOWNHOMES.  THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING AN INCREASE ON THE SPACING OF THE TREE REQUIREMENT FROM 25 TO 30 FEET AND WHAT THAT MEANS IS INSTEAD OF PAINTING TREES EVERY 25 THE THAT WOULD BE INCREASED TO 30 FEET.  THERE ARE SOME RESTRICTIONS AS IT RELATES TO UTILITIES AND DRIVEWAYS THAT HAMPER THE REQUIREMENT.  STAFF IS RECOMMENDING.  THE LAST OF THE MAJOR WARRANT RELATES TO BOMBSHELLS AND THIS IS THE RESTAURANT AND IS REFLECTED ON THE SCREEN IN RED RIGHT HERE. THIS IS I 30 AND IT IS THIS PARCEL RIGHT HERE.  IT ALSO HUGS THIS PORTION OF THE LAKESHORE.  THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A MAJOR WARRANT TO REDUCE THE FACADE GLAZING REQUIREMENTS FROM DEFEAT TO 15 FEET ON ALL ELEVATIONS AND ALLOW A SINGLE STORY BUILDING OR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS BEING DEVELOPED WITH A RESTAURANT AND I ALSO POINTED OUT THAT IT IS ADJACENT TO 30 AND ALSO THE RESTAURANT BOTH A PLAZA AREA AND HAS A COVERED PATIO WITH LAKE FRONTAGE AND REALLY THE RESTAURANT FROM A MINUTE IS ASIAN PERSPECTIVE HAS THE RESPECTIVE RIGHT HERE AS YOU CAN SEE WITH THE PATIO, OUTDOOR SEATING, ALL PARKING IS SCREENED FROM THE OPEN SPACE TO MAINTAIN THE VISUAL APPEAL OF THE LAKE IN THE HIKE AND BIKE COURT OR SO IN ESSENCE THIS CAN BE CONSIDERED AN OUT PARCEL FOR DEVELOPMENT OR A STANDALONE PARCEL.  FOR THE FORM BASECOAT ALL COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS MUST HAVE WINDOWS FOR 60 PERCENT OR NO MORE THAN PERCENT OF THE GROUND OR FACADE.  KEEP IN MIND THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING AN ADDITIONAL WARRANT TO ALLOW A SINGLE STORY BUILDING.  THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE FACADE FROM 60 PERCENT TO 15 PERCENT ON ALL ELEVATIONS GIVEN THE LOCATION OF THE STRUCTURE AND THE ASSOCIATED STRUCTURE. IT DOES NOT FOLLOW TYPICAL URBAN STANDARD SETTING AND HINDERS THE SCREENING OF THE MECHANICAL ROOMS OR OPERATIONS STAFF HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE TEACHER WARRANT.  THIS GIVES YOU A BETTER SHOT OF THE BUILDING IN TERMS OF THE GLAZING REQUIREMENT AND IT ALSO ADDRESSES PERMIT FOR A TWO-STORY BUILDING AS THE FORM BASE CODE STATES A MINIMUM TWO-STORY BUILDING IS ACQUIRED IN THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A SINGLE STORY BUILDING.  THE CODE ALSO STATES THAT IF IT IS A SINGLE OR ONE-STORY BUILDING IT CAN BE APPROVED BY WARRANT IF THERE IS A UNIQUE CONDITION TO THE DEVELOPMENT.  THE PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT THE INTENT AND PURPOSE OF THIS OR PERMIT AND STAFF RECOMMEND THIS FAVORABLY.  AS WITH ANY PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES WERE SENT WITHIN A 200 RADIUS AND A HUNDRED PER DAY NOTICE WAS SENT OBVIOUSLY THE LARGE AREA YOU CAN BE A NUMBER OF NOTICES WAS ONE IN THE 200 FOOT RADIUS AND THE RESPONSES RECEIVED OUR NONE.  I AM GOING TO NOW ADDRESS STAFF RECOMMENDATION JUST TO CLOSE AND SUMMARIZE AS IT RELATES TO EACH OF THESE ITEMS THAT I HAVE DISCUSSED.  I HAVE ALSO PROVIDED THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND OWNING COMMISSION BECAUSE THESE ITEMS WERE SLATED ON THE APRIL 26 EATING.  THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR THE REGULATING PLAN THE STAFF RECOMMEND DISAPPROVING THE REALIGNMENT OF THE HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL AND THE STAFF RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO WAIVE ALL REQUIREMENT FOR THE PUBLIC TRAIL.  THE STAFF IS FAVORABLE AS IT RELATES TO THE OTHER ASSOCIATED REGULATING PLAN AMENDMENT.  AT THE APRIL 26 MEETING THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE REGULATING PLAN AMENDMENT AND RECOMMENDED DISAPPROVAL OF THE HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL RELOCATION IN THE REQUESTED MAJOR WARRANT TO WAIVE ALL REQUIREMENT FOR THE PUBLIC TRAIL THIS IS A 7-0 
          [02:05:03]
VOTE.  AS IT RELATES TO THE EAST TOWNHOMES, STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS TO GROUP FULLY APPROVE THE WAIVER OF THIS TO, APPROVE THE REQUIREMENT TO WAIVE THE STOOP, DENIAL OF THE REQUEST TO REMOVE THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE STREET SIDE OF THE POST TOWNHOME, APPROVAL TO INCREASE THE TREE SPACING FROM 25 ON CENTER TO 35 ON CENTER.  THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON APRIL 26 MEETING RECOMMENDED WITH A SIX TO ONE VOTE APPROVAL OF THE MAJOR WARRANT TO WAIVE THE STOOP ENTRY REQUIREMENT, AND I'LL THE MAJOR WARRANT TO REMOVE THE SIDEWALK ALONG THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROPOSED TOWNHOME AND APPROVAL OF THE MAJOR WARRANT TO INCREASE THE TREE SPACING EVERY 30 FEET ON CENTER.  THE RESTAURANT NATURE WARRANTS FOR BOMBSHELLS STAFF COMMENCE APPROVAL OF THE MAJOR WARRANT REQUEST.  THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THIS ITEM ON THE 26 AND RECOMMENDED APPROVAL WITH A 7-0 VOTE.  WITH THAT, COUNSEL I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ENTERTAIN ANY WESTERN IN THE ALSO PRESENT SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF THEM. 
          >>  COUNSEL?  ANY QUESTIONS FOR MUNAL?  WHAT IS THE AMOUNT OF FROM THE BACK PROPERTY LINE ON THOSE TOWNHOME TO THE WATER? 
          >>  I'M GOING TO HAVE TO LEAN ON CARLOS THAT.  YOU HAVE THOSE 
          SF CITY? >>  WHAT IS THE DISTANCE TO BACK LINE WATER TOWNHOMES ON THE PENINSULA?  SYDNEY HAS THAT 
          ANSWER SO WE WILL LEAN ON HER. >>  SHOULD'VE ASKED.  DO YOU HAVE A PRESENTATION?  OKAY. SO, WHO DO YOU WANT TO ANSWER? BUT SYDNEY HAS MORE OF THE DETAILS.  SHE IS WITH THE 
          APPLICANT. >>  DOES ANYONE KNOW HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS?  YOU CAN ALSO CALL HER BACK UP. 
          >>  SYDNEY STRATTON, THIS IS A BIT DIFFERENT THAN YOUR TYPICAL LAYOUT FOR PLAN, WHAT WE DID WITH P&Z AND WE DID IS GO THROUGH EACH ITEM AND GO THROUGH THE ONES THAT ARE SIMILAR IN THAT WE CAN GET TO EVERY SINGLE ONE IF WE HAVE SO WORKING OFF THE REGULATING NURSE, IF THAT WORKS EVERYONE FIRST ITEM ON THEIR GOING TO USE THIS AS THE PRESENTATION BELEN YOU KNOW IF WE CAN PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. SO, THE FIRST ONE ON THE REGULATING PLAN IS THE PHASING PLAN AND WE DISCUSSED THAT WITH THE REGULATING PLAN WHICH SET MORE DETAILS THAN WE DID A YEAR AND HALF AGO AS THAT WAS THAT AS YOU CAN SEE THE PHASING HAS NOT CHANGED TIMELINE WISE JUST ADDITIONAL DETAILS.  THERE'S A ORDERLY USING SOME DIFFERENT THINGS ADDED IN BUT OVERALL THE TIMELINE HAS REDUCED SLIGHTLY ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT, I CAN ANSWER.  WE CAN GET BACK TO THAT ONE.  I APOLOGIZE THE COLORS DO NOT MATCH BUT THE LEGEND ITSELF IS MORE HELPFUL. 
          ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT? >>  ANY QUESTIONS, COUNSEL BACK 
          NO QUESTIONS THERE. >>  SECONDARY IS THE PUBLIC TRAIL WHICH WILL TAKE SOME ADDITIONAL CONVERSATION.  TO ANSWER THE QUESTION, IT VARIES WHICH YOU CAN SEE A LITTLE BIT THAT ARE ON THIS SLIDE AND ALSO ON THE WIDE THAT HAVE THE SECTION ON IT WHICH I WILL BE MOVING TO SHORTLY.  IT'S NOT IN THIS PORTION OF THE SECTION. ESSENTIALLY WHAT HAPPENED IS WHAT HAPPENED WHEN YOU GO TO FROM CONCEPT TO DESIGN THE INTENT IS TO HAVE A LAKE FRONT TRAIL WHICH EXTENDS THE REST OF THE PROPERTY AND IS DESIGNED AROUND THE PROPERTY ALMOST ALL THE WAY AROUND IT.  THE ISSUE IS WE ARE RUNNING INTO PINCH POINTS FROM AN ENGINEERING STAMP POINT PAY THE ROADWAYS ARE SET FOR THEY HAD TO BE AT A CIVIC RATE IN ORDER TO SERVE THE ENTIRE SITE AND FACILITATE THE DRAINAGE.  YOU CAN DRIVE OUT THERE THOUGH I DON'T RECOMMEND IT.  THAT DOES LEAVE A LITTLE ROOM TO CHANGE THE GRADE OF THE TOWNHOME AND WE CAN SEE THAT WE ARE WORK ON THESE ITEMS AND THERE ARE OTHER WARRANT.  THE TOWNHOMES ARE DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE GRADE. 
          URGENTLY SHORELINE IS NOT.  IT WAS THAT WHERE IT WAS AND DUE TO WHERE THESE TOWNHOMES ARE LOCATED THEY VARY ANYWHERE FROM 10 TO 15 AND THAT'S FROM THE BACK OF THIS LOT.  THIS IS THE BACK OF THE LOT TO THE SHORELINE LIKE HERE AND HERE. 
          AND THEN YOU GET SOME AREAS THAT HAVE LARGER.  THIS ONE IS BETWEEN 30 AND 50 FEET TO THE MAJORITY WILL BE IN THE 10 TO 
          [02:10:03]
20 RANGE.  THE DIFFICULTY HERE THAT YOU SAW ON THE FURTHER ON CROSS-SECTION WE ARE LOOKING AT A 35 PERCENT PLUS SLOPE ON THE BACK OF THESE TOWNHOMES.  THAT IS NOT A BACKYARD BY ANY MEANS AND WE ARE WORKING WITH THE BUILDER ON THAT TO COME UP WITH SOME UNIQUE SITUATION AND AS YOU CAN SEE WHEN WE GET TO THAT SHEET AGAIN WE ARE ACTUALLY PROPOSING A DECK OFF THE BACK IS WILL NOT HAVE YOUR TRADITIONAL YARD LIKE YOUR REGULAR COMMUNITY WOULD.  THIS IS A 15 TO 20 PERCENT DROP FROM PAD TO SHORE.  YOU'RE PHYSICALLY STANDING SIDEWAYS. 
          SO, LIKE WE SAID YOU'VE WORKED WITH THE BUILDER TO PROPOSED DECKS BACK THERE AND THEY WILL BE AT THE SHORELINE TO STABILIZE IT FOR EROSION CONTROL.  BECAUSE THE SLOPE IS SO GREAT NOT SURE IF THE GRASS CAN BE MOWED OR MAINTAINED. 
          SO, WHEN WE STARTED TO LOOK AT THE TRAIL IT JUST DOESN'T MAKE ENGINEERING SENT TO PUT IT BACK THERE.  IT'S NOT SOME OF THESE AREAS.  IT'S A MASSIVE UNDERTAKING TO GET THIS AREA TO WORK FOR THE TOWNHOMES THEMSELVES.  AGAIN, CONCEPT VERSUS DESIGN.  IS NOT THE INTENTION TO PROVIDE A LACKED A PUBLIC TRAIL.  WE UNDERSTAND IT CROSSES THE STREET.  WE UNDERSTAND THAT PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IS OF UTMOST IMPORTANCE IN THE CURVES AT BOTH ROAD SLOW CARS OF IT IN THE TWO DRIVEWAYS AS WE DID OUT THERE WILL BE TWO CROSSWALKS AS THESE TRAILS HAVE IN THE TWO DRIVEWAYS WILL BE FOR PRINCES TO THE CONDO TOWER NOT RETAIL OR RESTAURANT USE. WE DO EXPECT A SMALLER USAGE OF CARS.  AS PROPOSED TWO CROSSWALKS TO THE PUBLIC AREA THAT WE CAN STILL MAINTAIN THIS WILL BE A PART IN PUBLIC ACCESS.  IT WON'T BE MUCH DUE TO THE SLOPE AND WITH A TRASHCAN THERE COULD BE SOME ROOM FOR THE DOGS TO RUN AROUND.  THIS WILL BE THE JETTY OUT THERE IN THE GOAL IS TO PUT A NATURAL TRAIL PATH OUT THERE SO WE CAN FILL BE UTILIZED. 
          PEOPLE LIKE TO THROW FISHING POLES OUT THERE.  THIS IS THE BEST OF THE REASONING OF THE TRAIL.  THE TRAIL WAS SUPPOSED TO MOVE AROUND THIS CORNER.  IF ANY OF YOU HAVE BEEN OUT THERE THERE ARE MASSIVE PILES OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS MAY BE THE RIGHT WORD.  OLD CONCRETE AND REBAR AND THAT SORT OF THING ON I 30 FROM DECADES AGO.  THE TRAVEL MANY OFF THE SHORELINE AND MANY FEET DEEP WHICH IS NOT FEASIBLE FOR US.  WE WOULD HAVE TO EXPAND THE AREA OF THE PENINSULA INTO THE CITY OF DALLAS WATER WILL BE 20 TO 30 EIGHT.  AGAIN, THE GOAL IS TO PROVIDE A PUBLIC IMMUNITY THAT IS WIDE ENOUGH AND USEFUL ENOUGH EVERYONE TO UTILIZE BUT AGAIN ON THE BACK THOSE TOWNHOMES IS NOT GOING TO BE FEASIBLE.  THAT'S MY SPIEL ON THAT THE LONGEST ONE WILL TALK ABOUT THE HOPE THAT ANSWERS A FEW OF YOUR QUESTION.  CAN I ANSWER ANYTHING ELSE ON THOSE? 
          >> MAYOR:  I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT TRAILS.  COUNCILMEMBER 
          ROBERT BLAKE MARGOLIS? >>  I WAS GOING TO SAY JUST FROM SEEING THE 35 PERCENT PLUS SLOPE PLUS THE 10 TO 15 FOOT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE BACK DOOR AND SIDEWALK IS ENOUGH REASON TO GO WITH THE ALTERNATIVE PLAN FOR THE TRAIL POSITIONING.  JUST FROM THE LOOK OF IT.  I WENT OUT THERE MYSELF A FEW DAYS AGO TO SEE IT AND THE PHOTO, THE CONCEPT THAT YOU SHOWED REALLY EXPLAINED IT BETTER FOR ME. 
          >>  COUNCILMEMBER BROWNIE SHERRILL? 
          >>  I AGREE WITH COUNCILMEMBER ROBERT BLAKE MARGOLIS.  IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO PUT IT THERE.  WE ALREADY SAID WE WANT TO PUT TRAILS BEHIND HOUSES. THAT IS WHAT THAT IS DOING. 
          AND I KNOW THERE IS TALK ABOUT -PEOPLE CROSSING THE STREET FROM WHERE I LIVE THERE IS A TRAIL THAT CROSSES THE STREET AND THERE ARE FLASHING LIGHTS AND PEOPLE ACROSS THERE ALL THE TIME.  I THINK THE ALTERNATE PLAN IS GOOD.  I HAVE A QUESTION.  I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT THE TOWNHOMES IN THE DRIVEWAYS, HOW LONG ARE THE DRIVEWAYS? 
          >>  YOU HAVE ASKED FOOT FOR AN AMENITY ZONE UNIT WHERE THE TREE WELLS WILL SIT I'M NOT SURE IF YOU CAN SEE THAT.  THIS IS ACTUALLY A GOOD VERSION OF THAT.  IMAGINE THAT THE DRIVEWAY AND THEN YOU HAVE ANOTHER 12 TO THE HOUSE.  IT'S 
          IN 18 FOOT TOTAL. >>  I HAVE A NORMAL SIZE PICKUP AND IT IS 19 AND A HALF LONG. IF YOU HAVE A SIDEWALK RUNNING 
          [02:15:02]
DOWN THAT, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO WALK OUT THE STREET TO GET AROUND MY TRUCK.  I DON'T THINK A SIDEWALK IS GOOD ON THAT SIDE OF THE ROAD ANYWAY.  IT WOULD BE READY IF IT WAS RASTER SOME 
          THING. >>  AS YOU CAN SEE ON THAT, I'LL GET TO THE SIDEWALK QUESTION BUT AS YOU CAN YOUNG THE PLAN IS NOT A LOT OF ROOM FOR SPACE ANYWAY.  THERE WILL BE CARS BLOCKING THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK.  IF IT IN THERE YOU CAN'T STOP DELIVERY DRIVERS OR EVEN PEOPLE DROPPING THEIR CAR TO RUN INSIDE.  NOT TO MENTION THE LARGER TRUCKS THAT EXIST. 
          >>  THANK YOU. >>  ANY OTHER TRAIL DISCUSSION? 
          COUNCILMEMBER PAMELA BELL? >>  YES.  I WAS THINKING ABOUT IF YOU HAD A SIDEWALK AND THEN YOU'RE GOING TO PUT THE TRAIL 
          THERE, THERE'S TWO IN THERE RIGHT NOW?  >>  YES AND THAT'S WERE GETTING THIS AGAIN CAN SEXUALLY THESE MAKE SENSE. 
          THIS DESIGN WE FEEL REALLY REALLY WORKS REALLY WELL IN AGAIN IN MY OPINION A 10 FOOT PUBLIC TRAIL THAT IS MAINTAINED AND AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE PLAN IT WILL BE FULLY TREE-LINED ALONG THE STREET AND IT WORKS BETTER, IN OUR OPINION. 
          >>  IF I WAS A HOMEOWNER I'M NOT REALLY WOULD NOT WANT TO PIECES OF CEMENT IN FRONT OF MY HOUSE THAT'S A LOT OF CONCRETE. 
          A LOT OF COST. >>  I WANT TO GO OUT BETWEEN THE AREA IN THE CONDO.  THERE IS NO PUBLIC ACCESS?  THAT AREA, CAN YOU PULL UP AND GO BACK CONCEPTUAL PLAN?  YOU ARE KIND OF ON THE EAST SIDE OF WHERE THE PROMENADE IS BEFORE 
          YOU GET INTO THE PRIVATE SIDE. >>  THE NET PROCESS TO JOIN THE TRAIL AND THIS IS ALL THE AMENITY ZONE OF THE ECONOMY PHILLY CONDOMINIUM TOWERS.  WE WILL HAVE PICKLE BALL, VOLLEYBALL, ALL FOR THE RESIDENT OF THE CONDO UNITS. 
          THE PLAZA TRAIL WILL EXTEND IN FRONT OF THIS TOWER AND THEN EXTEND UP TO THE NORTH AND CONNECT TO THE HIKE AND BIKE 
          TRAIL. >>  THAT WILL BE CONTROLLED ACCESS?  YOU WOULD ABLE TO HAVE PUBLIC ACCESS TO THAT AREA? 
          >>  CORRECT. >>  GOING THROUGH THE REMAINING ITEMS WE HAD A MASTER SIGN TENANT PACKAGE AND AMENDMENT TO THE WARRANTS FOR THE GAS PUMPS. WE DID HAVE THE ITEM ON THE AUTO METRIC PLAN THE STAFF AND I WORK OUT WITH.  I THINK WE WILL WITHDRAW THAT WHEN AT THIS TIME.  REALLY ON THE AMENDED PLAN I WOULD LIKE TO FOCUS ON THE ASSIGNED PACKAGE AND HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL.  ARE THERE ANY OTHER ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS ON 
          THAT PORTION? >>  NUMBER NEITHER QUESTION WAS ON THE DOMESTIC PEACE.  IF YOU'RE REMOVING THAT ONE FROM THE REQUEST I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.  IT WOULDN'T MAKE SENSE IF YOU HAD A TRAIL BEHIND ONE'S HOUSE AT WAS TWO FEET AWAY FROM THE FENCE AND THEN YOU HAD LIKE THERE.  I WOULD 
          NOT WANT THAT. >>  THEY WORK IN TANDEM AND THAT'S WHY WE WERE LOOKING AT THAT PIECE.  I DON'T KNOW IF HER DOING INDIVIDUAL HEARINGS ON THESE PEER TO KNOW WE HAVE SOME OTHER ITEM I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAVE A WESTERN ON THE BOMBSHELL OR ANY OTHER ITEM.  I THINK THOSE ARE A LITTLE MORE 
          STRAIGHT WORD. >>  I THINK THOSE WERE THE BIG ONES THAT WERE DENIED BY P&Z THAT WE REALLY WANTED TO HASH OUT TO TALK ABOUT.  IF THERE'S NO OTHER QUESTIONS WE WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND WE HAVE A WRITTEN AND A SPEAKER SO OUR 
          FIRST ONE IS BRIAN GILARDI. >>  HELLO.  BRIAN WILL ARTIE, THE TRAILS.  ON THE SOUTH CORNER IT IS 108 FEET FROM CURB TO WHERE I DIDN'T WANT TO WALK ANY FURTHER.  IT AVERAGES ACROSS THE AREA NO LESS AND 103 FEET AND I JUST HEARD TONIGHT THAT THE LOT IS A READY FIVE BY 60.  I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE REAL CONCERN IS ABOUT PUTTING A TRAIL BACK THERE.  AT THE VERY LEAST THAT TRAIL COULD BE COUNTER LEVELED OUT OVER THE WATER WITHOUT HAVING TO WORRY ABOUT WHAT IS UNDERNEATH IT. 
          I'VE SEEN THAT IN LOTS OF PLACES LIKE THE LAKE AND GAITHERSBURG I DON'T SEE A PROBLEM AT ALL IN RUNNING THE TRAIL AND IN ACCORDING TO THE ORIGINAL VISION WHICH WAS THE TIRE TRAIL ALONG THE LAKE I'M GLAD TO HEAR THE METRIC WARRANT HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE NOT BEING ABLE TO MEASURE THE LIGHT IT WOULD'VE BEEN A DANGEROUS TRAIL.  THIS IS AN ENTERTAINMENT AREA YOU WILL HAVE PEOPLE OUT THERE AT NIGHT AND IN TERMS OF TRAILS KIND PEOPLE'S HOUSES, THE ISSUE AT THAT TIME WAS PUTTING TRAILS BETWEEN PEOPLE'S HOUSES WHEN THEY LIVED THERE.  NOT PUTTING TRAILS BEHIND HOMES WHERE THE BUYER KNOWS THERE WAS A TRAIL BEHIND IT.  I WOULD SAY THAT IN 
          [02:20:03]
FACT THERE ARE MANY PLACES WHERE THAT IS AN AMENITY THAT PEOPLE WANT BECAUSE THEY WANT TO HAVE MOTION.  THEY WANT TO HAVE THINGS GOING ON.  THIS IS AN ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT NOT A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.  I WOULD ASK YOU WHO ARE LEANING TOWARDS MOVING THE TRAIL THIS IS AS IMPORTANT TO THE HOTEL AND YOU JUST HEARD YOU CAN'T GET AROUND THAT AREA OTHER THAN CROSSING THE STREET.  YES, THERE IS A PINCH POINT ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER YOU HAVE SOME SORT OF STORM SEWER THERE YOU CAN BUILD A BRIDGE AND THEN A PINCH POINT TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER.  YOU CAN BUILD A COUNTER LEVEL TRAIL PWITHOUT A PROBLEM.  I SUPPORT THE MAJOR WARRANT FOR THE RESTAURANT THERE'S NO CONCERN ABOUT THAT AND THE SIDEWALK LOCATION, I AM WILLING TO GIVE THE SIDEWALK IF THAT'S WHAT IT TAKES TO MAKE SURE THE TRAIL GOES A LONG WAY.  I THINK THERE IS ROOM TO BROWNIE!, I HAVE BEE IN ANY CITIES WHERE INSTEAD OF HAVING A DRIVEWAY TO PARK IN YOU COME OFF THE STREET AND GO STRAIGHT INTO YOUR GARAGE.  TRY WALKING OVER SAN FRANCISCO, NEW YORK OR ANY OTHER URBAN AREA. 
          YOU CAN PULL OFF THE STREET, PULL STRAIGHT INTO YOUR GARAGE AND SAY THAT EXTRA 18 ON THE FRONT OF THE SPACE.  STILL HAVE THE SIDEWALK AND HAVE 20 OF SPACE AND ON THE BACK OF THIS PROPERTY WHEN THEY BUILD THAT DECK IT IS GOING TO BE 10 FEET HIGHER THAN THE TRAIL.  THERE'S GOING TO BE A NO PRIVACY ISSUE. 
          YOU'RE GOING TO LOOK UP ON YOUR DECK TEAM DOWN AT PEOPLE WALKING BY, IF YOU CHOOSE TO. THE OTHER THING IS THIS PROPERTY LOOKS OUT ON A BOAT DOCK SO THERE'S NO PRIVACY THERE.  THOSE BOTOX EXPAND RIGHT OVER THE BACK OF THIS PROPERTY AND YOU'LL HAVE PEOPLE OUT THERE - 
          >>  THANK YOU.  THE OTHER ONE IS FROM LORI.  I AM OPPOSED TO REDUCING THE LIGHTING ALONG THE TRAILS PAID DISCRETE SAFETY ISSUES FOR THOSE IN THE TRAILS IN THE EVENING AND EARLY MORNING.  I WANT TO FEEL COMFORTABLE TAKING A WALK AFTER EATING AT ONE OF THE RESTAURANTS.  HAS ANYONE DISCUSSED THIS WITH PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICIALS?  IT SEEMS LIKE A DARK TRAIL RIGHT OFF I 30 WOULD BE AN IDEAL SPOT FOR TRANSACTION.  FURTHER I AM OPPOSED TO ELIMINATING AUTO METRIC PLAN REQUIREMENT IF THIS IS HOW THE CITY WILL PROVIDE ADEQUATE LIGHTING I AM PROPOSED TO THIS IN FRONT OF THE TOWNHOMES.  ONE OF THE MAJOR FEATURES ARE THE TRAILS ALONG THE LAKE.  CROSSING STREETS IS HAZARDOUS AND NO ONE WANTS TO WALK ALONG TOWNHOMES WHEN THEY CAN WALK ALONG THE LAKE. 
          DEVELOPER ARGUES THERE'S NOT ENOUGH SPACE TO PUT IN BOTH THE TRAIL AND HIT TOWNHOMES ON THE LAKESIDE SIDE OF THE STREET. 
          THE DEVELOPER SHOULD MOVE THE TOWNHOMES ACROSS THE STREET OR BUILD A TRAIL OUT OVER THE LAKE SIMILAR TO THE TRAIL AROUND WHITE ROCK LAKE ERIE THIS WAS A MAJOR SELLING POINT AND NOW IS NOT THE TIME THIS TO BE A REDUCED AMENITY.  DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING?  ALL RIGHT. 
          WITH MEN, WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.  ANYBODY HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS AT THIS POINT? 
          BRIAN, GO AHEAD. >>, BECAUSE WE COMBINE THE PUBLIC HEARING GOING TO ASK FOR COMPLICITY SAKE THAT WE 
          CONSIDER AN ACT ON ALL OF THESE ITEMS IN PROPER SEQUENCE?  >> THAT'S WHAT I WAS PLANNING ON DOING.  TO ADDRESS THE TRAIL, BRIAN, I AGREE WITH YOU AND I WENT OUT AND I WALKED THAT I LOOK AT IT WORK A LOT. CURIOUS, KENT, I AM SURE YOU HAVE AN ESTIMATE OF WHAT IT WOULD COST TO BUILD THIS SECTION OF TRAIL TO CANTILEVER IT OUT OVER THE LAKE AND TO DO ALL OF THAT, WHAT IS YOUR ESTIMATE ON THE? 
          >>  THIS IS A BUDGET THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO STRIP OTHER AMENITIES AND WE FEEL MORE IMPORTANT FOR THE PROJECT. 
          THAT IS MORE THAN HALF THE VALUE OF THE LOT AND IT JUST DOES NOT MAKE ECONOMIC SENSE. NOT TO MENTION WE DON'T WANT IT, THE BUILDER DOESN'T WANT IT, IT'S A BETTER POSITION 
          WHERE WE HAVE IT. >>  THANK YOU.  SO, YOU TAKE IN EVERYTHING TOGETHER IT, YOU HAVE TO LOOK, WHEN WE MADE THE DECISION NOT TO PUT TRAILS BEHIND ANYBODY'S FUTURE HOUSES IT WASN'T JUST HOUSES THAT WERE THERE FUTURE HOUSES AND THIS IS THE ONLY SECTION THAT GOES BEHIND SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSES ON THIS ENTIRE PROPERTY.  FOR THE COST THAT IS THERE FOR THIS SEGMENT OF TRAIL THAT IS THERE IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE..  WE GO OUT THERE YOU ACTUALLY PHYSICALLY WALK THE SITE WHERE THOSE HOMES ARE AND WHAT THE SLOPE IS THERE THEN YOU LOOK AT COMPOUNDING COST ON TOP OF THAT FOR THIS COMMUNITY WHICH WOULD TAKE AWAY FROM SOMEONE ELSE, TO ME, YOU'VE GOT TO LOOK WHEN YOU 
          [02:25:01]
GO DOWN TO THE NUTS SIMPLE OF THESE HAVE TO LOOK AT EACH INDIVIDUAL COUNCILMEMBER MARGOLIS? 
          >>  I COMPLETELY AGREE WITH THAT.  MY REASON OR SUPPORTING THE REALIGNMENT OF THE TRAIL FROM BEHIND THE TOWNHOMES IS JUST DUE TO THE LAP OF HIS ABILITY.  ADDITIONALLY, WHAT WE JUST HEARD, THE VALUE OF THE TRAIL GOING ALONG THE TOWNHOMES DOES NOT REALLY EQUALLY TO MILLION-DOLLAR OF ADDITIONAL COST THAT WILL BE ENCUMBERED THAT ALIGNMENT.  SO, THE REALIGNMENT BEHIND THESE TOWNHOMES TO BE MAKES MOST 
          SENSE. >>  THANK YOU.  ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME?  ALL RIGHT THEN WE WILL START WITH ITEM 8D. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ON A REQUEST BY SAPPHIREAY LAND HOLDINGS, LLC, APPROVING MAJOR WARRANTS AND REVISING THE REGULATING PLAN TO REVISE REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO PARKING LOTS, DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITIES, BUILDING ORIENTATION, FRONT-ENTRY GARAGES, TRAIL LIGHTING STANDARDS, SIDEWALKS, TRAILS, SIGNAGE AND GAS PUMPS ON A 115.32 +/- ACRE SITE LOCATED IN THE SAPPHIRE BAY PENINSULA. 
          8E. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING THAT WAS THE FIRST ONE ON THE LIST.  DO WE HAVE A MOTION OR EIGHT D? 
          >>  CAN I HAVE A ASK A QUESTION? 
          >>  THIS HAS A LOT OF SUBJECTS I WANT TO LOOK AT THOSE. 
          >>  I KIND OF THINK THAT MIGHT NEED TO TAKE EACH ONE INDIVIDUALLY BECAUSE THERE IS A LOT. 
          >>  WHAT WOULD BE HELPFUL IF WE PULLED UP THE PRESENTATION WHICH IS ONE OF THEM BULLETED OUT WE COULD EVERYTHING ON TRACK.  WE DON'T NEED TO DO EACH ITEM IN THEIR 
          INDIVIDUALLY. >>. 
          >>  THIS IS A REGULATING PLAN. >>  IT IS IMPORTANT TO REALIZE WHICH ITEM GOES TO WHICH PART OF THE PRESENTATION. 
          >>  EXACTLY. >>  THE FIRST ITEM IS THE WIND PLAN.  SO, WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REGULATING PLAN? COUNCILMEMBER ROBERT BLAKE MARGOLIS? 
          >>  YES I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO PROVE THE REGULATING PLAN. 
          >>  TO BE HAVE A SECOND? >>  COUNCILMEMBER WHITNEY 
          LANING? >>  SECOND. 
          >>  ALL RIGHT WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND?  ANY DISCUSSION 
          ON THE REGULATING PLAN. >>  WE HAVE SOMETHING WRONG? 
          >>  NUMBER. >>  IT IS LATE.  ALL RIGHT.  WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND IF THERE'S NO DISCUSSION PLEASE 
          CALL A VOTE. >>  CAN I ASK FOR 
          CLARIFICATION? >>  WE JUST CALL THE VOTE SO WE HAVE TO GET THAT AND THEN WE CAN HAVE THAT.  THEN WE CAN MAKE A NEW MOTION BUT I CALL THE VOTE SO THE BOAT HAS TO STAND AND THEN WE CAN GET CLARIFICATION AND THAT CHANGES YOUR MOTION THAT WE CAN MAKE VERIFICATION BUT RIGHT NOW WE HAVE CALL THE VOTE SO THAT HAS TO GO THROUGH. 
          >>  ALL RIGHT.  THAT PAST 4-1. NOW, IF YOU WOULD LIKE 
          CLARIFICATION? >>  DOES THIS INCLUDE WAVING THE PHOTOMETRIC REQUIREMENT? BECAUSE I HEARD A DIFFERENT DISCUSSION I WANT TO BE ABSOLUTELY SURE. 
          >>  OKAY, THANK YOU. >>  YES. 
          >>  BEAUTIFUL, THANK YOU. >>  THAT TAKES US TO ITEM. 
          >>  I WILL GO TO THE RESTAURANT FIRST I THINK THAT IS HOW THE 
          AGENDA IS WRITTEN. >>  THE FACADE AND SINGLE STORY 
          BUILDING? >>  WE WILL GO TO THAT ONE IN 
          JUST A SECOND.  THERE WE GO. >>  OKAY.  IS EVERYBODY ON THE SAME PAGE?  ALL RIGHT DO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR THIS ONE? COUNCILMEMBER BROWNIE SHERRILL? >  I MOVE TO APPROVE THIS 
          [02:30:01]
          PLAN. >>  TO HAVE A SECOND? 
          >>  COUNCILMEMBER PAMELA BELL? WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS TOGETHER ITEM?  NO?  PLEASE 
          CALL A VOTE. >>  AND THAT MOTION PASSES 5-0. 
          ALL RIGHT.  THE LAST ONE IS ITEM 8F.  THIS IS THE STUPID ENTRY SIDEWALK LOCATION ENTRY SPACING.  IF YOU COULD GO BACK TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS ON THIS ONE?  JUST TO MAKE SURE WE ARE 
          ALL ON THE SAME PAGE. >>  RECOMMENDATIONS?  BEAR WITH ME.  WE ARE GETTING THERE.  WE ARE ON THE EAST TOWNHOMES? CORRECT?  YES.  THIS ARE WE IN THE RIGHT ONE?  THIS ONE DOES NOT MENTION SIDEWALKS AND THIS ONE HAS OYEZ SIDEWALK LOCATIONS, I APOLOGIZE.  THIS WAS THE EAST TOWNHOMES AND? OKAY.  DOES ANYONE HAVE A DISCUSSION ON THIS ONE?  DOES SOMEBODY WANT TO MAKE A MOTION? DO WE NEED MORE CLARIFICATION ON WHAT THIS ONE IS?  NUMBER IT IS.  YOU JUST HAVE TO GO GIVE 
          IT A SECOND. >>  THE AGENDA ITEM AS WRITTEN CONTAIN THE ORDINANCE OF THE PACKET ARE IN APPROVAL OF ALL THE ITEMS INTERROGATION OF THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION TO DENY THE SECOND ONE AND A MOTION IS MADE TO APPROVE THE AGENDA ITEM THAT WOULD BE ALL ONE, TWO AND THREE ITEMS WOULD BE APPROVED 
          IN THIS IN ONE FELL SWOOP. >>  RIGHT. 
          >>  OKAY. >>  IF YOU WANT TO TAKE P&Z'S RECOMMENDATION YOU CAN MAKE A MOTION TO THAT RECOMMENDATION OR STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION OR HOW THE ORDINANCE IS WRITTEN. 
          MUNAL MULLIDAD?  STRAIGHTEN US OUT. 
          >>  HIM TO GO BACK TO THIS BECAUSE IT WILL GO BACK TO IT. 
          SO THAT YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHAT IS BEING REQUESTED AND THAT WILL MAKE IT EASIER.  HERE WE GO.  THIS IS THE APPLICANT'S 
          REQUEST. >>  THIS IS THE ONE THAT I WANTED BROUGHT UP.  THAT IS HOW THE ORDINANCE IS WRITTEN? RIGHT.  WE WOULD HAVE TO BE VERY CIVIC. 
          >>  COUNCILMEMBER BROWNIE SHERRILL? 
          >>  MOVED TO APPROVE ITEM 8F. >>  A MOTION AND A SECOND?  YOU WANT TO STEP BACK AND LOOK AT THAT AGAIN?  SEE CONFUSED CASES.  I WANT EVERYBODY TO BE CLEAR WHAT YOU ARE VOTING FOR. 
          >>  THESE ARE THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. 
          >>  THIS WILL BE ITEM AS WRITTEN THAT WOULD GRANT MAJOR WARRANTS TO REVISE THE STUPID ENTRY, THE SIDEWALK LOCATION AND INCREASE SPACING REQUIREMENT. 
          >>  RIGHT.  IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT THEN 
          YOU WOULD HAVE TO BE YES. >>  YES.  IF YOU APPROVE THE MOTION THAT IS ON THE TABLE RIGHT NOW IT WOULD LET THEM MOVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE STUPID ENTRY, REMOVE THE REQUIREMENT OF THE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE STREET AND IT WOULD REDUCE THE TREE SPACING ENOUGH THE CURRENT MOTION ON THE FLOOR.  WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.  IS EVERYONE CLEAR?  ALL RIGHT.  I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE KNOWS WHAT THEY ARE VOTING ON IT IS COMPLICATED STUFF VERY MUCH SO. 
          I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND AND IF THERE'S NO DISCUSSION 
          LET'S CALL THE VOTE. >>  THAT MOTION PASSES 5-0. 
          THAT WAS A LOT TO GET THROUGH. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR BEARING WITH US.  ALL RIGHT.  NOW, WE ARE GOING BACK TO ITEM EIGHT BE 
          [8B. Conduct a public hearing and take action to approve an ordinance amending Chapter 77-803.F of the Rowlett Development Code to clarify and revise requirements for mailing, posting and publishing notices of public hearings and to comply with state law.]
          [02:35:12]
TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CHAPTER 77 ? 083 OF THE ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE TO REVISE, REQUIREMENTS FOR MAILING, POSTING AND PUBLISHING NOTICES OR PUBLIC HEARINGS TO COMPLY 
          WITH STATE LAW. >>  THIS IS A WORK SESSION ITEMS THAT WAS DISCUSSED AT COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO AND IN THE INTERVENING TIME THERE WAS A PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON THIS LAST AND SO WE ARE BRINGING THIS FORWARD FOR YOUR CONSIDERATIONS EVENING.  THIS IS IN REGARD TO REQUIREMENTS FOR NOTICES ON ITEMS REQUIRING A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AND OR PLANNING AND ZONING MISSION.  WE ARE PROPOSING THESE AMENDMENTS TO BE COMPLIANT WITH THE CURRENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE TO INCREASE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF POSTED SIGNS REQUIRED FOR ZONING ACTIONS AS WELL AS TO BETTER ENGAGE OUR COMMUNITY AND THE PUBLIC REVIEW AND PARTICIPATION PROCESS THERE ARE THREE PART TO PUBLIC NOTICE HERE IN ROWLETT THE FIRST PUBLISHED NOTICE THIS IS IN REGARDS TO LEGAL ADS PLACED WITHIN THE DALLAS NEWS. 
          NOTICES ARE PLACED FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE REQUIRES THE CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING TO BE REQUIRING TO HAVE THE REQUIRED PUBLISHED NOTICE. CURRENTLY, THE MALE NOTICE THAT IS DOUBT TO PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN ACERTAIN DISTANCE OF A PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR A ZONING ACTION TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE REQUIRES A PROPERTY CODE OF 200 FEET TO BE REQUIRED.  THAT SENT OUT PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC DURING 12 DAYS PRIOR TO THE CITY OF ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE ALSO REQUIRES A NOTICE THAT IS SENT TO PROPERTY OWNERS HAVING PROPERTY WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SUBJECT SITE BOTH OF THOSE NOTICES WHICH ARE SENT OUT TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APARTMENT AND INCLUDE A RESPONSE FORM TO THE RECIPIENT TO RECIPROCATE THEIR THOUGHTS ON THE REQUEST. NOTE THAT THE COURTESY NOTICE IS NOT REQUIRED UNDER THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE.  THE LAST PART FOR NOTIFICATION WOULD BE WHAT WE CALL THE POSTED NOTICE. 
          THIS IS A SIGN THAT IS PLACED ON A PROPERTY.  OUR DEVELOPMENT CODE STATES THAT THE APPLICANT TO POST A SIGN NO PRIOR TO THE INCISION MAKING BODY PARTICULAR BEING THE CITY COUNCIL PRESENTLY THE STAFF FACES THE SIGN ON THE PROPERTY NO LESS THAN 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MEETING.  CHANGES WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE THAT WOULD SEND NOTICES FOR THE MAILED NOTICE 12 DAYS PRIOR TO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.  WE WOULD ALSO ADD A DEADLINE FOR THE RECEIPT OF ANY RESPONSES TO BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE COUNCIL PACKET AS WELL AS THE 500 FOOT COURTESY NOTICE WOULD BE CHANGED TO A POSTCARD TO DIFFERENTIATE THAT.  IT WOULD NOT INCLUDE A RESPONSE FORM. 
          IT WOULD ALSO NOTE THAT WE WOULD RECEIVE, HAVE A QR CODE THAT WOULD BE PLACED ON BOTH OF THESE NOTICES SO THAT FOLKS COULD ZAP IT WITH THEIR CELL PHONE, SMART TO GET THAT INFORMATION.  AND GO BACK TO THE SLIDE THAT I WOULD TIP OVER.  WE WOULD ALSO CHANGE THE PUBLISHED NOTICE AND ONLY PLACE A LEGAL ADS PRIOR TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE THAT WOULD BE PUT INTO THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS 15 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING WITH CITY COUNCIL.  A LEGAL NOTICE WOULD BE PUBLISHED PRIOR TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.  THE LAST PART WOULD BE REGARDING THE POSTED SIGN ON THE SITE.  WE WOULD CONTINUE TO HAVE THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE APPLICANT TO PLACE THAT SIGN HOWEVER IT WOULD CHANGE THE REQUIREMENT FOR IT BEING 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND NOT THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING.  WE WOULD ADD SPECIFICITY FOR THE PLACEMENT ON THE PROPERTY WHICH WOULD BE PLACED ON THE SIGN WHICH WOULD ALSO NOT BE CURRENTLY STATED IN THE DEVELOPMENT CODE.  THIS IS NOT PROPOSED TO BE QUALIFIED WITHIN THE ORDINANCE HOWEVER IT WOULD BE INCLUDED IN OUR DEVELOPMENT GUIDE FOR DEVELOPERS TO KNOW WHAT THOSE REQUIREMENTS WOULD BE.  THE PROPOSED SIZE OF THE SIGN WOULD BE AT THIS POINT WORKING WITH A 4 X 4 TEMPLATE ON THEIR AND IT 
          [02:40:01]
WOULD ALSO REQUIRE FOR THE APPLICANT TO PROVIDE NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT STATED COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS AS WELL AS WITH A DATED PHOTO SHOWING THE SIGN WAS PLACED ON THE PROPERTY.  STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND APPROVAL ON THESE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS AND WITH THAT IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS 
          I WILL WORK TO ANSWER IT. >>  THIS IS STRAIGHTFORWARD AND WE WENT IN DEPTH WITH THIS TWO WEEKS AGO AND THERE WAS A LOT OF INFORMATION ON THEIR IF PEOPLE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW THERE'S EXAMPLES OF HOW BIG THE SIGNS WILL BE IN SOME REALLY COOL STUFF IN THE BOTTOM LINE IS IT WILL MAKE IT A LOT EASIER FOR THE PUBLIC TO KNOW WHEN THERE IS A ZONING REQUEST CHANGE AND HOW TO BE ABLE TO CEMENT COMMENTS INTO IT.  I RECOMMEND YOU GO IN AND WATCH THAT WORK SESSION IF YOU'RE INTERESTED IN IT.  THE QUESTIONS ON THIS?  ALL RIGHT THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING AND AT THIS POINT I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM?  ALL RIGHT YOU WOULD NEED TO FILL OUT A CARD AND THEN FILL IT OUT AFTERWARDS IF YOU WOULD LIKE.  ALL RIGHT WE NEED YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. 
          >>  JENNIFER DIXON, QUESTION.  THE POSTING OF THE SIGN IS SAID A LOT OF TIMES THAT IT WOULD BE FOR THE DECISION-MAKING BODY AND I MENTIONED THAT IS OFTEN TIMES CITY COUNCIL AND NOT ALWAYS. 
          THAT IS TRUE.  SOMETIMES IT IS PLANNING AND ZONING.  I DID TALK ABOUT POSTING THE SIGN BEFORE PLANNING AND ZONING IF NOT IT WILL GET REPOSTED BEFORE CITY COUNCIL OR BEFORE CITY COUNCIL.  I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE GET CONFUSED.  THAT THEY DON'T KNOW THEY HAVE ANOTHER CHANCE OR THAT IT WILL GO AGAIN 
          TILL THE NEXT MEETING. >>  THE REQUIREMENT WOULD BE THE REQUIREMENT WOULD REMAIN ON THE SITE THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE PUBLIC AIRING PROCESS UNTIL THE DECISION-MAKING BODY HAS ACTED ON THAT REQUEST. 
          >>  OATH DECISION-MAKING BODIES. 
          >>  ANY DECISION-MAKING BODY. TYPICALLY THERE IS ONE AS A RECOMMENDING AND ONE THAT IS A DECISION. 
          >>  CORRECT. >>  DID THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION?  [LAUGHTER] ALL RIGHT.  ARE THERE ANY OTHER COMMENTS?  ALL RIGHT THEN I AM GOING TO POST THE PUBLIC DURING IF WE HAVE NO DISCUSSION I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. 
          COUNCILMEMBER BROWNIE SHERRILL? >  I MOVE THAT WE PASSED 
          ITEM TO BE. >>  TO BE HAVE A SECOND? COUNCILMEMBER ROBERT BLAKE MARGOLIS? 
          >>  YES I WILL SECOND THAT. >>  I HAVE A MOTION ANY 
          DISCUSSION?  CALL A VOTE. >>  THAT PASSES 5-0.  THE LAST 
          [8C. Conduct a public hearing and consider action to approve an ordinance amending Section 77- 508 "Residential Building Standards” of the City of Rowlett Code of Ordinances – Rowlett Development Code repealing provisions relating to building materials and revising building orientation standards for residential buildings.]
ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION TONIGHT IS ITEM HC.  8C. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER ACTION TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 77- 508 "RESIDENTIAL BUILDING STANDARDS? OF THE CITY OF ROWLETT CODE OF ORDINANCES ? ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE REPEALING PROVISIONS RELATING TO BUILDING MATERIALS AND REVISING BUILDING ORIENTATION STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS.  THIS IS IN REGARD TO BUILDING REQUIREMENT DEVELOPMENT HUNDREDS FOR RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES.  ONE THE DEVELOPMENT CODE IN ITS ITERATION WAS ADOPTED IN 2006. 
          THESE HAVE SINCE NOT AN ADDRESS.  THERE HAVE BEEN AMENDMENTS TO TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE THAT HAS SOME EFFECT HERE AS WELL AS CHANGES IN HOME STYLES, DEVELOPMENT TRENDS AS WELL.  WITH THIS WE ARE PROPOSING TO AGAIN COMPLY WITH THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE TO ELIMINATE THE UNNECESSARY DELAY TO APPLICANT AND RESIDENT TO REDUCE COUNSEL REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION IN THE STANDARD AND ALSO WOULD BRING THESE FOR NOW PRIOR TO THE COMPREHENSIVE CODE DATE BECAUSE THESE AREN'T READY TO GO AND AS WE MENTIONED WE HAVE A NUMBER OF CASES THAT WE RECENTLY CONSIDERED AS WELL AS ENDING PERMIT.  RESECTIONS TO ADDRESS. BUILDING MATERIALS BACK IN 2019 AT THE STATE LEGISLATURE WE ADOPTED HOUSE BILL 2439 WHICH PROHIBITED CITIES FROM WORSENING MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS AND WHEN THAT REQUESTED THE CITY OF ROWLETT STOPPED IN FORCING THOSE PROVISIONS WE RECOMMEND THOSE APARTMENTS BE REMOVED FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE.  SECONDLY WE HAVE A SECTION ENTITLED ORIENTATION OF DWELLING TO THE STREET.  THIS 
          [02:45:02]
IS INTENDED TO ENSURE THAT GARAGE IS WHEN LOCATED DO NOT OBSCURE THE FRONT OR THE ENTRANCE OF THE HOME.  THERE IS A SECTION IN THERE THAT REQUIRES THE FRONT DOOR WILL BE WITHIN EIGHT THE MOST FORWARD FACING HOUSE.  THE TREND AND DESIGNEDDESIGNS HAVE CHANGED RECENTLY SO THAT THOSE NEW HOME IN ROWLETT DO NOT HAVE REAR ALLEYS WHICH WITHIN THE TWO GARAGE IS CLOSER TO THE STREET OR THE SECOND PART TWO THAT WOULD A HOOK ROGER WHICH IS A GARAGE THAT DOES NOT HAVE THEIR DOORS FACING TOWARDS THE STREET.  IT WOULD NEED TO BE PROVIDED WHEN LOTS HAVE DRIVEWAY ACCESS TO THE STREET. 
          THEREFORE THE GARAGE BECOMES A FRONT PLANE MAKING COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARD THEREFORE WE RECOMMEND ELIMINATING THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE FRONT DOOR TO BE WITHIN EIGHT FEET OF THE MOST FORWARD FACING BUILDING. THE LAST PART THE RDC STREET FACING GARAGE DOORS IN RELATION TO THE FRONT FA?ADE COULD BE NO MORE THAN THE FRONT FA?ADE. THE NARROW LOTS IN YOUR HOMES IN STREET FACING GARAGE IS ARE GOOD WITH THAT.  THIS COULD BE TO STANDARD SINGLE DAY GARAGE DOORS FOR A TWO CAR GARAGE. 
          >>  IT SOUNDS SO EASY SOMETIMES . 
          >>  OR THE SECOND WOULD AGAIN BE A SINGLE DOUBLE BAY GARAGE DOOR HAVING A WIDTH OF 16 TO 18 FEET.  IT WOULD ALSO CHANGE TO CLARIFY THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE MINIMUM DEATH OF A GARAGE TO TESTIFY THAT THAT WOULD BE THE PARKING AREA OF THE GARAGE MUST BE A MINIMUM DEPTH AND THAT MEASUREMENT IS TAKEN FROM THE INTERIOR OF THE STRUCTURE.  THE STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THESE AMENDMENT AND IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS I WOULD BE HAPPY 
          TO ANSWER THEM. >>  AGAIN WE TALKED AT LENGTH ABOUT THIS TWO WEEKS AGO SO IF ANYONE IS INTERESTED IN THE PDETAILS IF ANYONE HAS ANY QUESTIONS ESSENTIALLY THIS BRINGS US UP TO CODE IN THE DEVELOPMENT THAT NEEDED TO BE DONE.  I HAVE A MOTION?  OH, PUBLIC HEARING.  IT IS LIKE I AM READY TO GO.  SO, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK AT THE PUBLIC HEARING?  IF NONE WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND IF THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.  COUNCILMEMBER BROWNIE SHERRILL?  >  I MOVE TO PASS 
          ITEM. >>  DO I HAVE A SECOND? 
          COUNCILMEMBER PAMELA BELL? >>  I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? SEEING NONE LET'S CALL THE 
          VOTE. >>  THAT ITEM PASSES 5-0. 
          THANK YOU.  MARTHA AT HOME AND BROWNIE FOR
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.