[4A. Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation to City Council on a request by Tyler Scott, Kimley-Horn, on behalf of property owners Hopewell Development II, LP to amend a Planned Development Standard within an existing Planned Development (PD) with a base zoning of General Commercial/Retail (C-2) District. The property is located northwest of the cul-de-sac of Enterprise Drive, consisting of Lot 6, Block 1, Rowlett Business Park, a portion of Lot 3, Block 1, Boyd & Kneggs Business Park Replat, and Tract 6 of the U Matthusen Abstract 1017 also described as all of Tract 1 to the Doreen Sue LiuzzI & Doreen Sue Luizze Family Trust Inst. No. 201700024931, in the City of Rowlett, Dallas County, Texas.]

MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL ON A REQUEST BY TYLER SCOTT, KIMLEY-HORN, ON BEHALF OF PROPERTY OWNERS HOPEWELL

[00:05:01]

DEVELOPMENT II, LP TO AMEND A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STANDARD WITHIN AN EXISTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, PD, WITH A BASE ZONING OF GENERAL COMMERCIAL/RETAIL, C-2, DISTRICT. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED NORTHWEST OF THE CULDE-SAC OF ENTERPRISE DRIVE, CONSISTING OF LOT 6, BLOCK 1, ROWLETT BUSINESS PARK, A PORTION OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1, BOYD & KNEGGS BUSINESS PARK REPLAT, AND TRACT 6 OF THE U. MATTHUSEN ABSTRACT 1017 ALSO DESCRIBED AS ALL OF TRACT 1 TO THE DOREEN SUE LIUZZI AND DOREEN SUE LUIZZE FAMILY TRUST. NUMBER 201700024931, IN THE CITY OF ROWLETT, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS.

SHOULD THAT IS A LONG ONE. SHOULD I WILL BE PRESENTED THE ENTERPRISE COMMENT CENTER , BACKGROUND ON THIS. IF YOU WITH IT IT HAD COME IN PREVIOUSLY, HOPE WILL PLAN DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY IS COMPOSED OF THREE PARCELS OF APPROXIMATELY 4.33 ACRES WITH ACCEPT ENTERPRISE DRIVE. ON JULY 1123 THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT GRADING ORDINANCE 1923 THE CONTENT PLAN WAS CONTAINING A SINGLE APPROXIMATELY 7000 SQUARE FEET. SO WITHIN THIS ORDINANCE THERE WAS CONDITIONS THAT WERE PLACED ON IT FIRST WAS AT THE MINIMUM DIMENSION OF VEHICLE PARKING SPACES MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE RTC. SECOND WAS SIMILAR ALL PARKING SPACES IN THE BUILDING THE THIRD WAS MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SEMITRAILER FLASHING 2 MILLION TRUCKS COMING AND GOING OUT TO THE SITE SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 20 DAYS. ADDITIONALLY CITY COUNCIL MINUTES REFLECTED TWO ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS WHICH WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE FILE ORDINANCE. ONE WAS THAT INDICATED ALL TRUCK ACESS TO BE FROM THE NORTHWEST EXIT AND NOT BE SOUTH EAST. WILL BE ROUTED TO THE NORTHWEST. THE REQUESTS YOU HAVE FOR YOU TODAY IS THAT THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING TO AMEND THE PD DISTRICT TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM NUMBER SEMITRAILERS FROM TWO PER DAY TO THE EXPERT DAY. ESSENTIALLY THAT IS THE REQUEST MOST OF THE SITE PLAN WILL BE AS IT WAS PROVIDED PREVIOUSLY. THE CAT IS PURSUANT TO AMEND THE PD TO ACCOMMODATE MORE THAN INTENDED USERS OF THE ACCESS POTENTIAL INVESTORS IN THE PROJECT THAT CONDITION

>> AS A RECAP, THE CURRENT CONCEPT PLAN DOES REFLECT 180 VEHICLE PARKING SPACES AND YOU WILL SEE THAT UP THERE IS IN CONTEMPLATION SO ESSENTIALLY TO THE WITH TO HAVE THOSE LOADING BASES, REALLY DOES HAVE TWO OF THE LARGE ONES FOR THE LARGE VEHICLES THEN REMAINING ONE WOULD BE ORIENTED FOR THE SMALLER KARCHER LEGALS -- COMMERCIAL VEHICLES . PROVIDED PRELIMINARY STATEMENT SPLIT ANALYSIS TO HAVE THE ANALYSIS INDICATED IT WOULD BE NO MORE THAN TWO SEMITRAILERS /18 WHEELER TRUCKS DURING PEAK HOURS. WE DID PROVIDE NOTIFICATION TO THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS WE PROVIDED 17 TO THE 223 TO BE 500 WE DID RECEIVE ONE IN OPPOSITION 500, THAT WAS INCLUDED IN THE PACKET. STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS THAT THE PROPOSED PD AMENDMENT BE APPROVED THE PROPOSED PD AMENDMENT ESSENTIALLY DOES NOT MATERIALLY CHANGE THE USE OR CHARACTER OR DEVELOPMENT, BUT WE REALLY HAVE COME IN TODAY IS JUST A CHANGE OF COMPANY TRUCKS CRITICAL PER DAY. SO APPROVAL AT THE REQUEST AMENDED PLAN DEVELOPMENT WITHIN EXISTING PLAN DEVELOPMENT WAS BASED ON GENERAL COMMERCIAL RETAIL CT DISTRICT WE DO WANT TO GET APPROVAL AT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. THE FIRST WOULD BE TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM NUMBER SEMITRAILERS /18 WHEELERS COMING IN REPORT FROM THE SITE TO KNOW THAT WAS WHERE THEY. THE SECOND WOULD BE TO INSTALL ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE ON THE PROPERTY REQUIRING THE TRUCK ACCESS TO BE FROM THE NORTHWEST EXIT AND NOT THE SOUTH EAST THE TRUCK TRAFFIC BE ROUTED TO THE NORTHWEST WITH THAT SIGNAGE. I AM AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS, WE HAVE ENOUGH GET HERE AS WELL.

[00:10:04]

CHEVRON DOES THE APPLICANT HAVE A PRESENTATION ONCE AGAIN? NO, BUT THEY WANT TO GO OFF AND THE HAD A QUESTION. ANY

QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF? >> THE ONLY QUESTION I HAVE IS THE TWO PER DAY LIMITATION WAS ACTUALLY , I BELIEVE, CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG, BROUGHT UP TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DURING THE INITIAL ZONING CHANGE .

EVIDENTLY THAT WAS AGREED TO FOLLOWED UP WITH THE CITY COUNCIL. MY QUESTION THOUGH WAS IS THERE ANY REQUIREMENT TO LIMIT THE NUMBER OF TRUCKS AT THE FACILITY THAT YOU KNOW OF? OR WAS THAT JUST SOMETHING BROUGHT UP BY THE PNC THEN

AGREED TO? >> IT WAS OF THE PRODUCT THAT HE CAN SEE THEN AGREED TO. SHOW IS THERE ANYONE ON THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THAT HAS THE SAME 18 VILLAGE TO THE

FACILITY? >> ON THE SITE. SING WITH INDISCERNIBLE - LOW VOLUME ] CHEVRON VOLUME ]

>> THAT WE CAN LOOK AT SOMETHING THAT IS UNENFORCEABLE , WE WILL NOT HAVE A POLICE OFFICER OUT THERE THERE IS ANOTHER TRUCK

.. >> .

>> THE OTHER THING I THINK IT IS INTERESTING IS THAT 66 WILL IMPROVE TRUCK ROUTE, ROWLETT ROUTE IS NOT APPROVED ROUTE AND ENTERPRISE DRIVE HAS A LOT OF TRAFFIC LOW VOLUME ] IF WE ACTUALLY CONTINUE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT THERE IS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE 18 WHEEL TRUCK TO ENTERPRISE DRIVE THE SPRINT STRIVE AT A SINGLE CROSSING THAT WOULD MAKE IT EASY FOR THEM TO GET OUT OF OR INTO TRAFFIC SO WITH DEBBIE COUNTED AS ATTRACTIVE THAT FACILITY OR WHATNOT? DO WE REALLY NEED TO LIMIT , IS THE QUESTION?

>> JUST A GENERAL QUESTION SEE WHAT

VOLUME ] >> MR. HERNANDEZ, ASKING WHAT THE PEAK HOURS ARE. SURE INSIDE THE LOW VOLUME ] GENERATION BETWEEN THE A.M. AND 70 AM, TO THE 9:00 A.M. AS WELL AS THE EVENING HOURS 7 P.M. UNTIL NINE A CLOCK -- 4:00 UNTIL 6:00? 4:00 TILL 6:00 IN THE EVENING HOURS. THAT TRIP GENERATION ONLY IDENTIFIED 20 VEHICLES OR TIME TO EATING WHEELS DURING THAT TIMEFRAME. TWO VEHICLES .

SHOULD ANY OTHER COMMENTS ? NO ?

>> WELL I WOULD BE INCLINED OR I WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS PARTICULAR REQUEST WITHOUT STIPULATING ANY NUMBER OF TRUCKS THROUGH THAT SITE.

REALLY SIGNAGE WISE, WOULD BE NICE TO HAVE JUST A SIGN THAT SAYS TRUCK TRAFFIC IS LIMITED TO THE APPROVED ROUTES ACCESSIBLE TO THE SPRINT STRIVE. THAT TAKES CARE OF ANY TRUST IN THAT AREA , BUT THAT IS UP TO YOU GUYS. I CAN ASK

FOR A MOTION. >> YES, SIR ?

>> IF I, THE OTHER CONDITIONS WINTRY INCLUDED AS RELATED TO THE SIGNAGE WERE PARTICULAR TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN THEIR INITIAL MOTION TO APPROVE THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT SO THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT IS MORE OF JUST CLEANUP WORK BY THE CITY STAFF TO ENSURE THAT THE ORDINANCE CORRECTLY REFLECTS

[00:15:06]

WHAT WAS VOTED ON INITIALLY WITH THE PLAN SO THAT THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING IS TECHNICALLY JUST AS IT RELATES TO THE BENEFIT OF THE NUMBER OF TRUCKS SO THAT WAS ACTUALLY INITIALLY APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL AS PART OF THE

INITIAL REQUEST SHALL >> TRUCKS WERE NOT?

>> CORRECT. >> THEY BASED THE TWO ON THE

RECOMMENDATION, BUT -- >>

OVERLAPPING SPEAKERS ] >> MY ONLY COMMENT WAS AS IT RELATED TO THE SIGNAGE KEEPING THE LANGUAGE AS PROPOSED BY STAFF TO 10 CITY COUNCIL'S ORIGINAL .

LOW VOLUME ] >> I GUESS IT REALLY DOESN'T MATTER WHICH WAY YOU SAY THAT THIS IS. MR. HERNANDEZ?

>> MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST TO INCREASE THE VEHICLES OR APPROVE THE REQUEST TO

LOW VOLUME ]. >> IF YOU MAKE A MOTION THAT'S UP TO YOU, BUT I PERSONALLY WOULD NOT HAVE - LOW VOLUME ] UNENFORCEABLE. REALLY NOT NECESSARY , BUT THAT

IS UP TO YOU GUYS. >> VOLUME ] I WILL MAKE A MOTION. SHOULD MR. CHAIR THIS IS A

POETRY. >> MATURELY CALLING FOR A MOTION SEVEN. SPEAKER, RAY NEEDS SENIOR. SHOULD

>> COMMISSIONER THANK YOU, RAY NEEDS, RECITED 10 006 NORTH , AND ROWLETT . ACTIVE CITIZEN OF THIS COMMUNITY, 44 YEARS. I AM HERE JUST TO TALK BASICALLY I HAVE HAD MY OFFICE ON ENTERPRISE DRIVE, I BUILT THE THIRD PERSONALLY ON THEIR BUILDING ON THE RIGHT. I THERE NEW YEAR'S EVE THAT WE HAVE A PROBLEM. BY ONE OF YOU . RUN MY COMPANY OTHER THEIR WE HAVE THE OF THIS PROPERTY OUT OF THEIR. THE CUL-DE-SAC AZ MASSEY TAKING OVER THE STREET QUITE RIGHTLY. DOWN AT THE CLOSE BOARD AND I ACTUALLY PUT -- WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE PREVIOUS PARTY TO GO AHEAD AND JUST PUT ACTUALLY CONCRETE OR GOING INTO TO THE SHOPPING CENTER. WE DID THAT OUT OF THE POCKET OR ARE JUST PART THAT TO HAVE ACROSS THE STREET WHERE. IS NOT STREET, BUT WHAT WE PAID TO BE ABLE TO HAVE ACCESS TO IT. SO THE MAIN THING OF IT IS BEEN A PART OF THAT ACTUALLY THE WHOLE CORNER FOR THE WHOLE 12 ACRES. WE BUILT THE FIRST PHASE, FIRST ROWLETT SEVEN, SECOND PHASE OF THEIR FACEBOOK BROUGHT SUBWAY WELL BASICALLY BROUGHTON ALL OF THEM. I REALLY HERE TO INVEST IN THE FACT THAT WE HAVE GOTTEN OUT FIVE SIGNS ON THAT STREET AND EVERYONE IN THE IS SO FADED YOU CANNOT SEE OR READ THEM. LAST TIME I WAS HERE I MAKE THAT SAME POINT, ONLY WHEN I SAID TO YOU. YOU KNOW I FOR PROGRESS 18 WHEELERS WHEN WE GOT THE ONLY POST OFFICE IN THE CITY BEAR ON THE QUARTER. PEOPLE TOOK MY TYPE THEY BACKED UP GOING OUT ONTO ROWLETT ROAD ALL THE TIME NOW. WE HAVE A DANCE STUDIO THREE. WE HAVE A MAJOR PROBLEM. MR. CHAIR YOU KNOW I COULD UNDERSTAND, BUT WHEN WE PUT HER ON WE HAVE A PROBLEM YOU I WILL BE ONE OF THOSE TESTS WITH THIS IT WILL DO ABOUT IT, BECAUSE SHOULD GUESS WHAT ? WE WILL HAVE A BIGGER PROBLEM THAT WE GOT WHEN THEY LOAD THE TRUCKS RIGHT NOW WITH THE FORKLIFTS.

YOU COMMISSION CAN DO WHAT YOU WANT TO COUNCIL CAN, BUT ANYTIME IS A MEMBER OF HIS TEAM TAXPAYER RIGHT TO COMPLAIN MAJOR PROBLEM. YOU VERY MUCH.

>> THANK YOU, SERVI. ANY OTHER PUBLIC INPUT ? HEARING FOR THE

[00:20:02]

PUBLIC AND I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. OKAY.

COMMISSIONERS, ANY COMMENTS? QUESTIONS? CHILDREN INDISCERNIBLE - LOW VOLUME ] IT WORKS. SHOULD

>> YOU TALKED ABOUT TAKING IT OUT, BUT HOW DO WE ENFORCE IT IF WE LIMIT THE TRUCKS? I ARGUE IT IS NOT JOB, BUT WE HAVE A DEVELOPER THAT IT HAS AGREED-UPON TRUCKS STAFF THAT AS WE KNOW THAT SO I AM INCLINED TO MAKE IT A PROPOSAL TO IMPROVE IT, BUT WITH THE AGREEMENT THAT STAFF MEET WITH THE DEVELOPER CONNECTING CYCLE PARTIES AT LEAST ON THAT WE ARE OKAY WITH IT SO JUST MY THOUGHT PROCESS.

>> THOUGHT PROCESS, BUT NOT A MOTION?

>> NOT A MOTION. WE ARE STILL TALKING . WAITING FOR SOMEBODY ELSE THEN I WOULD BE GLAD TO MAKE A MOTION.

>> COMMISSIONERS, COMMENTS? >> I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE CONDITIONS THAT WE INCREASE THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SEMI-TRACTOR TRAILER MEETING WITH THE TRUCKS COMING AND GOING FROM THE SITE SHALL BE NO MORE THAT WAS TODAY, TRIED TO INSTALL ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE ON THE PROPERTY REQUIRING TRUCKS ACCESS FROM THE WEST AND NOT SELFIES AND B TRUCK TRAFFIC TO BE ROUTED TO THE NORTHWEST.

SHOULD MOTION ON THE TABLE, A SECOND?

>> MR. HERNANDEZ SECOND . WE HAVE A MOTION ABOUT SECOND TO APPROVE THE REQUEST AS PRESENTED. ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS ? CALLED THE VOTE.

[4B. Consider and make a recommendation to the City Council on a request by Dan Gallagher, P.E on behalf of property owner JSC-CCI Lakeview II, LLC for approval of a Tree Removal Permit on a property zoned Planned Development (PD) for Light Manufacturing (M-1) and Limited Commercial/Retail (C-1). The approximately 171-acre site is located at the northeast corner of the President George Bush Turnpike and Merritt Road, in the City of Rowlett, Dallas County, Texas.]

>> NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA, CONSIDERING MAKING RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON A REQUEST BY DAN GALLAGHER, P.E. ON BEHALF OF PROPERTY OWNER JSC-CCI LAKEVIEW II, LLC FOR APPROVAL OF A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT ON A PROPERTY ZONED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, PD, FOR LIGHT MANUFACTURING, M-1 AND LIMITED COMMERCIAL/RETAIL, C-1. THE APPROXIMATELY 171-ACRE SITE IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH TURNPIKE AND MERRITT ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ROWLETT, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. . RECYCLING?

>> GOOD EVENING, COMMISSION. THIS IS A REQUEST FOR A REMOVAL PERMIT FOR THE LAKEVIEW BUSINESS DISTRICT PROJECT.

THIS VIOLENCE I PLAN WAS THAT MINISTRY APPROVED ON JULY 2720 22. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THIS BODY APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT FOR THE INITIAL PHASE OF THIS PROPERTY CONTAINING 94 ACRES APPROXIMATELY. ON THE 23RD OF JANUARY. THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING, REMOVAL PERMIT FOR THE ENTIRE 171 ACRES IN ORDER TO PREPARE THE SITE FOR DEVELOPMENT . THE SITE IS THERE FOR YOU IN COLOR RED ON THE RIGHT-HAND SIDE. GENERALLY THE INTERSECTION OF THE WROTE INTO CONNECTOR AND BUSH TURNPIKE. THE ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE ANY HEALTHY TREAT WITH A MINIMUM 8 INCHES AND AND OUTER BREAST HEIGHT, DBH, IF YOU HEAR THAT ABBREVIATION THERE WITH EXCEPTION FOR HACKBERRY TREE SPOKE OF THOSE ARE CONSIDERED TO BE PROTECTED THEY ARE 11 INCHES OR GREATER DBH. DBH IS MEASURED AT 4 1/2 FEET ABOVE GRADE OF THE TRUCK DIAMETER IS ALSO THE ROWLETT POLITICAL RIDES A CALIBER OF ONE INCH PROTECTED TREE SO EVERYONE IN CHILD PROTECTIVE TRAIT THAT IS PRESERVED FOR SAINT IS GRANTED A ONE INCH CREDIT FOR NOT HAVING TO BE MITIGATED. THE PROVIDED A TREE SURVEY FOR US INDICATING THAT THERE WERE HUNDRED 42 PROTECTED TREES OF WHICH THERE WERE TOTAL OF 11,739 CALIBER INCHES .