[1. CALL TO ORDER]
          [00:00:21]
          IS AUTHORIZED BY SECTION 551071 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE THIS MEETING MAY BE CONVENED AS A CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR THE PURPOSES OF SEEKING CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL ADVICE FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY ON THE AGENDA ITEM HEREIN. THE CITY OF RELICT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO RECONVENE, RECESS OR REALIGN THE EXECUTIVE SESSION OR ORDER OF BUSINESS AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO ADJOURNMENT. 
          PROCESS OF PUBLIC INPUT, IF YOU ARE NOT ABLE TO ATTEND IN PERSON, YOU MAY COMPLETE THE CITIZENS INPUT FORM ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE BY : 30 P.M. THE DAY OF THE MEETING. ALL FORMS WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MEETING. FOR IN PERSON COMMENTS, REGISTRATION FORMS, INSTRUCTIONS ARE AVAILABLE INSIDE THE DOOR IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER. CALLED THE MEETING TO ORDER. FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS CITIZENS INPUT. AT THIS TIME THREE-MINUTE COMMENTS WILL BE TAKEN FROM THE AUDIENCE ON ANY TOPIC THAT CAN BE TAKEN 
          [3. CONSENT AGENDA]
BY THE COMMISSION DURING CITIZENS INPUT. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? SEE NONE, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE CITIZENS INPUT . NEXT ITEM IS CONSENT AGENDA. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS MAY BE ACTED UPON IN ONE MOTION. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OR CITIZEN MEYRICK WEST THE ITEMS BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION. ON TONIGHT'S CONSENT AGENDA WE HAVE CONSIDER ACTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 9TH, 2045, REGULAR MEETING AND ITEM 3 B, TAKE ACTION ON 9301 LAKEVIEW PARKWAY PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY JARED RIGGIN BOCK BASELINE CORPORATION ON BEHALF OF PROPERTY OWNERS EMMANUEL SNOY, MARIE PASCALE SNOY, AND CHARLES-ALBERT SNOY. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF LAKEVIEW PARKWAY AND DALROCK ROAD, CONSISTING OF 3.217 ACRES OF THE JOSIAH HART SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 111. ZALCON CENTER 1 BLOCK A, LOTS 3 R1-A, 3R 1-2 B AND 3R 1 DASHED C IN THE CITY OF RELICT, ROCKWALL COUNTY, TEXAS. DOES ANYBODY WANT TO REMOVE ANYTHING FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA? WILL I DO. I'M GOING TO REMOVE THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 9TH REGULAR MEETING. SO THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSISTS OF ONE ITEM. DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS? I'M READY FOR A 
          MOTION, THEN. >> GO AHEAD. 
          >> SOMEBODY NEEDS TO MAKE A MOTION. 
          >> ON A SECOND. LET ME CORRECT THAT BEFORE WE GO ANY FURTHER. SO WE NEED TO TAKE IT OFF THE CONSENT AGENDA AS WELL. WE'RE GOING TO 
          [3A. Consider approving the minutes]
GO AHEAD AND TAKE ITEM 3 B OFF THE CONSENT AGENDA, AS WELL. SO ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION? CONSIDER ACTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 9TH, 2025, REGULAR MEETING, AND I ASKED TO PULL THAT OFF THE CONSENT AGENDA BECAUSE ONE OF THE NOTES MADE IN THE MINUTES, WHICH AS SOON AS I FIND MY NOTES, I'LL TELL YOU WHAT THAT NOTE IS. ON THE NOTE CONCERNING SPEAKERS AGAINST -- OR THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE SECOND ITEM OF THE AGENDA, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED AT 8:02 AT 8:00 P.M., JUSTIN MARTINSON, ALLISON, DAN HOOP, SAMANTHA CHANDLER, JAMES PELLEGRINI, GREG BELLAMY AND DION FREI SPOKE IN OPPOSITION TO THE PD REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT, AND IN ALL ACTUALITY, SAMANTHA CHANDLER SPOKE IN SUPPORT OF THE PD. ARE THERE ANY OTHER -- DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY COMMENTS 
          ON THAT? >> I HAVE A COMMENT. IS MY MIC 
          ON? >> IT IS NOW. 
          >> OKAY. ON IIIA IT SAYS CONSIDER ACTION TO APPROVE THE 
          [00:05:05]
MINUTES OF JULY 22ND. I THINK THAT SHOULD BE AUGUST 26TH. 
          >> WHERE ARE YOU AT? >> ON IIIA. 
          >> YOU MAY BE ON THE WRONG PAGE. >> RIGHT, BUT THAT SEPTEMBER 9TH, YOU DIDN'T APPROVE THE JULY 22ND. 
          >> 
          HAVE ANY MEETINGS IN AUGUST. >> OH, OKAY. SORRY. NEVERMIND. 
          >> OKAY. ANY OTHER COMMENTS ON THE MINUTES? I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES WITH THE CORRECTION. MR. 
          POLLARD. >> MR. CHAIRMAN, I KNEW THAT THE APPROVE THE MINUTES AS WRITTEN WITH THE EXCEPTION OF WHAT YOU POINTED OUT, OF THE PERSON THAT SPOKE OUT IN SUPPORT THAT WAS 
          SHOWN AS AGAINST. >> WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND BY MS. WILSON. ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? SEE NONE, LET'S 
          CALL THE VOTE. >> 
          >> MAYBE. >> 
          [3B. Take action on the 9301 Lakeview Parkway Preliminary Plat submitted by Jared Riggenbach, Baseline Corporation on behalf of property owners Emmanuel Snoy, Marie Pascale Snoy, and Chales-Albert Snoy. The property is located at the northeast of the intersection of Lakeview Parkway and Dalrock Road, consisting of 3.217 acres of the Josiah Hart Survey, Abstract No. 111, Zalcon Center 1, Block A, Lots 3R1-A, 3R1-B, and 3R1-C in the City of Rowlett, Rockwall County, Texas.]
          >> OKAY. WELL -- AND THAT PASSES 7-0. MOVING ON TO THE SECOND ITEM, WHICH IS -- LET ME GET BACK TO THE SECOND ITEM. TAKE ACTION ON THE LAKEVIEW PARKWAY PRELIMINARY PLAT, WHICH WAS READ INTO THE RECORD INCORRECTLY AS BEING IN THE CITY OF RELICT AND IT'S ACTUALLY IN THE CITY OF RELICT, ROCKWALL COUNTY, TEXAS, SHOULD ACTUALLY READ CITY OF RELICT, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. 
          >> SECOND. IT'S JUST BEFORE COUNTY. WELL THIS IS A REALLY GOOD QUESTION. LET'S PULL UP THE DALLAS CAD. WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO. 
          >> ONLY PROBLEM I SEE HERE, ROWLETT COUNTY. WROTE THAT -- INAUDIBLE ] 
          >> ROWLETT COUNTY, TEXAS. RECORDS OF ROWLETT COUNTY, 
          TEXAS. >> SO WE CAN TAKE IT OFF 
          INAUDIBLE ] TO CORRECT IT. >> YEAH. YES, PLEASE. OKAY. SO I DON'T 3 B OF THE AGENDA IS GOING TO BE REMOVED FOR CORRECTION AND THEN RESUBMITTED TO US. OR ACTUALLY, DON'T WE HAVE TWO JUST APPROVE IT, BECAUSE WE REQUIRED TO TAKE ACTION WITHIN WHAT IS IT, 30 DAYS? AND WHAT'S THE TIMELINE ON THIS ITEM RIGHT NOW? DISAPPROVE IT. 
          >> ASK STAFF TO BRING IT BACK WITH THE CORRECTIONS. I WOULDN'T WANT THIS TO GET REPORTED. 
          >> I AGREE. OKAY. SO WE ARE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO DISAPPROVE ITEM 3 B ON THE CONSENT AGENDA, FOR 
          [00:10:05]
          CLERICAL ERRORS. MR. POLLARD? >> MR. CHAIRMAN, I MOVE THAT WE -- WELL I'M TRYING TO DO THIS IN A POSITIVE BUT IT'S NEGATIVE ALL THE WAY AROUND. DISAPPROVE AGENDA ITEM 3 B FOR CLERICAL ERRORS TO BE BROUGHT BACK AT A DIFFERENT TIME. 
          >> WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. POLLARD, SECOND BY MR. TUCKER. 
          ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? CALL THE VOTE. 
          >> HOLD ON, I'VE GOT A POINT OF ORDER. WHERE ARE WE SEEING THIS 
          ERROR? >> IN THE NOTES SECTION. 
          >> ON THE PLAT. >> ONE, TWO AND THREE, THE REFERENCE IS ROWLETT COUNTY, TEXAS. 
          >> OKAY. I WAS LOOKING AT THE TITLE BLOCK AND THAT WAS CORRECT, BUT YEAH, OKAY. THANK YOU. 
          >> SO WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR WITH A SECOND TO DISAPPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT. ANY DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE, 
          [4A. Conduct a public hearing and take action on a request by Tyler Scott, Kimley-Horn, on behalf of the property owner TX Enterprise Rowlett LP, for a non-residential replat from 2 lots into 1 lot. The 4.18- acre property is located southwest of the intersection of Rowlett Road and Lakeview Parkway, addressed as 3301 Enterprise Road, and is further described as Lot 6 of the Rowlett Business Park, in the City of Rowlett, Dallas County, Texas.]
CALL THE VOTE, AND THAT PASSES 7-0. MOVING ONTO INDIVIDUAL ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION, PUBLIC HEARING , COMMENTS MAY BE MADE IN PERSON AND WILL BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES. REGISTRATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE AVAILABLE INSIDE THE DOOR OF THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS. ITEM FOR A, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND TAKE ACTION UNDER CLASSIFIED TYLER SCOTT, KIMBERLY HORN ON BEHALF OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS TX ENTERPRISE ROWLETT LP FOR A NONRESIDENTIAL RE-PLAT FROM TWO LOTS INTO ONE. THE 4.18 ACRE PROPERTY IS LOCATED SOUTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION AT ROWLETT ROAD AND LAKEVIEW PARKWAY, ADDRESSED AS 3301 ENTERPRISE ROAD, AND IS FURTHER DESCRIBED AS LOT 6 OF THE ROWLETT IS NATS PARK IN THE CITY OF ROWLETT, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. MR. KING? 
          >> GOOD EVENING, I'M MICHAEL KING, SENIOR PLANNER. TONIGHT I'VE GOT -- THIS LOCATION IS 3301 ENTERPRISE DRIVE. IT'S OFTEN SPOKE ABOUT IN RECODE ROWLETT . THIS EVENING. THE USE THIS OFFICE IN SHOWROOM. ZONING IS PD WITH BASE ZONING FOR GENERAL COMMERCIAL C-2 ZONING, WHICH IS REFLECTED IN THE AREA TO THE NORTH, ALONG LAKEVIEW PARKWAY. THAT'S ALSO C 2 ZONING. THIS IS A REQUEST TO RE-PLAT THE OLD LOT LINES INTO ONE LOT. THIS IS A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. IT WAS APPROVED NOVEMBER 21ST OF 2024. THERE YOU GO, MS. WILLIAMS. THERE IS YOUR DAY FOR YOU. THIS IS A COPY OF THE RE-PLAT AND THE OLD LOT LINE WAS RIGHT THROUGH THE CENTER OF THIS. THE APPLICANT IS LOOKING TO ADJUST THE OLD LOT LINES TO INCORPORATE THE PROPERTIES INTO ONE LOT STAFF IS REQUESTING THAT THE RE-PLAT BE CONDITIONED TO THE FIRE EASEMENTS SURROUNDING THE PROPERTY ON THE PLAT AS WELL. APPROVAL OF THE RE-PLAT WITH THE CONDITION OF ADDING FIRE LANE EASEMENT IS OUR RECOMMENDATION. 
          ANY QUESTIONS? >> COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS 
          FOR STAFF? >> I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED BECAUSE I THOUGHT THIS BUILDING WAS BASICALLY ESSENTIALLY 
          ALREADY IN CONSTRUCTION. >> THEY ALREADY HAVE A FINAL PLAT BUT IT INCLUDED THE OLD LOT LINES ON THE FINAL PLAT THEY NEED TO BE REMOVED AND THEY ALSO NEEDED TO ADD THE FIRE LANES TO 
          IT. >> IS THE EXISTING STRUCTURE THAT'S ON THEIR NOW, THE STRUCTURE THAT'S UNDER CONSTRUCTION NOW, DOES IT NOT HAVE THE FIRE EASEMENTS AT THIS 
          POINT? >> IT DOES NOT HAVE THE FIRE EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT. 
          >> OKAY, SO THIS IS BASICALLY PAPERWORK. 
          >> SO IT'S PAPERWORK, OKAY, YEAH. 
          >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ? 
          >> YES. >> MR. POLLARD. 
          >> MICHAEL, WE TALKED ABOUT THIS EARLIER TODAY. UNDER DISCUSSION, JUST POINT OF CLARIFICATION, MAKE SURE IT ALL HITS TOGETHER, THE PURPOSE OF THE RE-PLAT IS TO ADJUST THE OLD LOTS INTO TWO LOTS AND IT SHOULD GO FROM TWO TO ONE LOT. 
          >> YES SIR, INTO ONE. >> OKAY. OKAY. 
          >> WELL MY COMMENT IS, BOLDLY STAMPED, THIS IS A PRELIMINARY 
          PLAT . >> THAT WILL COME OFF WHEN IT COMES FOR SIGNATURES, IS WHAT THEY'VE SAID. THAT'S THERE SURVEYOR'S -- HE WANTS TO GET PAID SO HE WON'T TAKE THAT OFF UNTIL IT'S APPROVED BY YOU GUYS AND WE'LL BRING IT TO YOU GUYS 
          [00:15:03]
          FOR SIGNATURES. >> ONCE AGAIN, THIS IS ONE OF THOSE THINGS WHERE, WHAT WE HAVE IN FRONT OF US IS NOT WHAT WE ARE GOING TO CONSIDER TO APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE. SO I MEAN WHAT'S HERE, I WOULD DISAPPROVE, BECAUSE NO FIRE LANES AND IT SAYS PRELIMINARY PLAT ON IT, OKAY? ANY OTHER COMMENTS BY COMMISSIONERS? WELL, I'M READY FOR A MOTION. 
          >> OKAY. BEFORE WE HAVE A MOTION, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING, SO I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR A COMMENT. 
          SEEING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. NOW I WILL 
          ENTERTAIN A MOTION. MR. POLLARD? >> MR. CHAIRMAN, I'LL MOVE THAT THE APPLICATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR THE PURPOSES OF ADDING 
          FIRE LANES -- >> THIS IS A FINAL PLAT. 
          >> I UNDERSTAND, AND TO CHANGE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT WORDING FOR 
          THE FINAL PLAT. >> UNDERSTAND WE HAVE A MOTION TO DISAPPROVE THE ITEM IN FRONT OF US AS IT DOES NOT HAVE THE FIRE LANES AND DOES INCLUDE A STAMP THAT SAYS IT'S PRELIMINARY. MS. WILLIAMS, YOU SECOND THAT? ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION. HEARING NONE, WE'LL CALL THE VOTE.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.