[4.A. Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council on a request by Chung Ng on behalf of the property owner, Hsiao Fei Liu, for consideration of Zoning Application #25 000093 for a Special Use Permit (SUP) to allow a massage establishment use on a property zoned Planned Development (PD) with a base zoning of C-2, General Commercial/Retail. The proposed use will be located in a vacant storefront, specifically addressed as 5321 Lakeview Parkway, out of the Thomas Lumley Survey, abstract No.789, Dallas County, Texas. ]

>> INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION, ITEM 4A, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON A REQUEST BY CHUNG NG ON BEHALF OF THE PROPERTY OWNER, HSIAO FEI LIU, FOR CONSIDERATION OF ZONING APPLICATION #25000093 FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT USE ON A PROPERTY ZONED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WITH A BASE ZONING OF C-2, GENERAL COMMERCIAL/RETAI L. THE PROPOSED USE WILL BE LOCATED IN A VACANT STOREFRONT, SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED AS 5321 LAKEVIEW PARKWAY, OUT OF THE THOMAS LUMLEY SURVEY, ABSTRACT

NO.789, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. >> GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS .

FRONT OF YOU IS FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO OPERATE A MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT WITH AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL RETAIL BUILDING. THIS IS LOCATED WITHIN A PLANT DEVELOP A DISTRICT WITH A BASE ZONING OF C-2 AND THE LOT IS APPROXIMATELY .69 ACRES AND LOCATED EAST OF PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH TURNPIKE AND SPECIFICALLY LOCATED AT 5321 LAKEVIEW PARKWAY. SOME

[00:05:02]

BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THIS ITEM, THE EXISTING BUILDING RIGHT NOW IS AROUND 6600 SQUARE FOOT OF A COMMERCIAL BUILDING DIVIDED INTO FIVE TENANT SPACES. THE SUITE IN QUESTION IS 104 WHEN THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT WHICH WILL INCLUDE THREE TO FIVE TREATMENT ROOMS, RESTROOM, LAUNDRY AREA, AND A STORAGE ROOM AND THE PROPOSED HOURS OF OPERATION ARE FROM 10:00 A.M. TO 9:00 P.M. ASIDE FROM THE REGULATIONS WITHIN THE ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE, THE APPLICANT NEEDS TO ABIDE BY ANY OF -- NEEDS TO COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 10, ARTICLE 5 OF THE ROWLETT CODE OF ORDINANCES WHICH SPECIFICALLY TALK ABOUT HOW WE REGULATE MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT . IN ADDITION, THE STATE LICENSING REQUIREMENTS THE APPLICANT WILL ALSO NEED TO FOLLOW. I WANTED TO SHARE SOME SITE CONDITIONS, THIS IS HOW THE SITE LOOKS LIKE TODAY WITH THE FIVE TENANT USES RIGHT NOW, THE ONLY VACANT IS 104 WHICH IS TRYING TO OPERATE AS A MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT. THE FUTURE LAND USE FOR THIS AREA IS DESIGNATED AS RETAIL-COMMERCIAL OFFICE, DRE ENVISIONS COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS THAT PROVIDE GOODS AND SERVICES, TYPICALLY ALONG A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE LIKE LAKEVIEW PARKWAY AND SERVING RESIDENTIAL AREAS . THE ALLOWED USE AS YOU WOULD SEE IN THIS CLASSIFICATION IS SINGLE AND MULTITENANT BUILDINGS , RETAIL STORES, RESTAURANTS, SPECIALTY SHOPS, SALONS, AND OFFICES, A PERSONAL SERVICE SUCH AS A MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT OPERATION IS USUALLY CONSIDERED WITHIN THIS LAND-USE DESIGNATION AS A SECONDARY USE TO THE PRIMARY USE WHICH IS THAT RETAIL COMPONENT.

AGAIN, AS I MENTIONED, THE ZONING IS PD WITH A PLAN DEVELOPMENT WITH A BASE ZONING OF C-2, THAT C-2 USUALLY ACCOMMODATES PRIMARILY RETAIL AS A SECONDARY USE, YOU WOULD SEE OFFICES AND THINGS OF PERSONAL SERVICE SUCH AS A MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT . FOR CONSIDERATION TONIGHT AND WHY THIS IS IN FRONT OF YOU, WHEN WE LOOK AT THE TABLE OF ALLOWED USES, IT TOLD US THAT ANY MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT WITHIN THE CITY OF ROWLETT WILL NEED A SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND THAT IS IN SECTION 70 731 OF THE ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE , ASIDE FROM THAT, WE LOOK AT WHETHER OR NOT THERE WAS ADEQUATE PARKING WITHIN THE BUILDING TO SUSTAIN THE NEED FOR THE OPERATIONS OF A MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT AND WHAT IS ALREADY EXISTING ON THE PREMISES, PRIMARILY RETAIL. WHAT THE APPLICANT CONFIRMED WITH US, THERE WAS ABOUT 34 PARKING SPACES AVAILABLE ON SITE . WHEN WE TOTAL THE CALCULATIONS OF ALL THE RETAIL THAT IS ALREADY EXISTING ON SITE PLUS THIS NEW OPERATION, THE TOTAL CAME OUT TO BE 22 PARKING SPACES WHICH MEANT THAT THERE IS ENOUGH PARKING TO MEET THE NEED. AS YOU ALL HAVE REVIEWED , THE STAFF REPORT WE SHARED WITH YOU ALL, THERE IS A REVIEW CRITERIA THAT WE HAVE WHEN WE RECOMMEND -- WHEN YOU ALL WOULD RECOMMEND A DECISION TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE APPROVING BODY WOULD APPROVE OR DENY AND TO CONSIDER CRITERIA AS SHOWN ON THE SLIDE IN FRONT OF YOU AND ON THE STAFF REPORT. ONCE WE DO A DEEP DIVE INTO THE CRITERIA AND OVERALL ANALYSIS, ASIDE FROM WHAT STAFF SHARED WITH YOU ALL IN THE STAFF REPORT, TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE COMPREHENSIVE -- WHETHER OR NOT IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND WHETHER IT COMPLIES WITH THE ZONING, WHETHER THIS PARTICULAR OPERATION IS DUE TO A CHANGING AND CONDITION OR TREND THAT IS HAPPENING, WHETHER IT IMPACTS THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY, THE INFRASTRUCTURE, BECAUSE IT IS ALREADY AN EXISTING BUILDING, ALREADY THERE, WE DO NOT FORESEE ANY IMPACT RELATED TO INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY. KEEP IN MIND, IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS AND ALSO THE SUITABILITY OF THIS OPERATION WITHIN THE PROPERTY THAT IS LOOKING TO LIVE IN . KEEP IN MIND, THE ZONING AND THE PROPOSED USE. WE DID SEND OUT A NOTICE -- NOTIFICATIONS TO OUR 200 FOOT NOTICES AND RECEIVED ONLY ONE IN OPPOSITION AND ONE IN FAVOR, AND WE SEND OUT NOTIFICATIONS TO OUR 500 FOOT BUFFER AND WE RECEIVED ZERO IN OPPOSITION AND ZERO IN FAVOR. YOU, AS A RECOMMENDING BODY TONIGHT, HAVE THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS OR MAY TAKE THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS, APPROVED, APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS, OR

[00:10:01]

DENY THIS REQUEST. THAT IS THE END OF MY PRESENTATION.

>> THANK YOU . QUESTIONS . COMMISSIONERS, QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF? THIS MICROPHONE IS MESSED UP. IS THE APPLICANT HERE? DO THEY WANT TO GIVE A PRESENTATION?

>> I DO NOT BELIEVE SO. >> COMMISSIONERS , LOOKING FOR A MOTION. IN THE AFFIRMATIVE. MR. HERNANDEZ ?

>> I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT AS

PRESENTED. >> MS. WILSON SECONDS IT. ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? CALL THE VOTE.

>> POINT OF ORDER . >> I AM SORRY , WE WILL NOT CALL

A VOTE. >> THERE HAS TO BE A PUBLIC

HEARING. YES. >> OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. DOES ANYBODY WANT TO SPEAK? WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

INAUDIBLE ] >> I WILL MAKE THE MOTION TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT AS PRESENTED.

>> ANY DISCUSSION ? MOTION PASSES, 7-0. MOVING ON TO 4B.

[4.B. Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council on a request by Joshua J Robinson, property owner, for consideration of Zoning Application #25-000108 for a Special Use Permit (SUP) to allow for the construction of enclosed accessory structure with an area greater than 500 square feet on a property zoned Single Family (SF-40). The site is approximately 1.617 acres, located east of Weems Way, addressed as 2906 Weems Way, also described as Block 1, Lot 3, of Toler Ridge No 1 Addition, in the City of Rowlett, Dallas County, Texas. ]

CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON A REQUEST BY JOSHUA J. ROBINSON, PROPERTY OWNER, FOR CONSIDERATION OF ZONING APPLICATION 25-000108 FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ENCLOSED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE WITH AN AREA GREATER THAN 500 SQUARE FEET ON A PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY (SF-40). THE SITE IS APPROXIMATELY 1.617 ACRES, LOCATED EAST OF WEEMS WAY, ADDRESSED AS 2906 WEEMS WAY, ALSO DESCRIBED AS BLOCK 1, LOT 3, OF TOLER RIDGE NO 1 ADDITION, IN THE CITY OF ROWLETT, DALLAS

COUNTY, TEXAS. MR. KING ? >> GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS, MICHAEL KING AM A SENIOR PLANNER. YOUR REQUEST FOR THIS SUP IS FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A 920 SQUARE FOOT DETACHED STRUCTURE WITH A HEIGHT OF 15.5 FEET. LOCATED IN THE SOUTHERN PART OF TOWN ON SOUTHEAST SIDE. IT IS SECTION 77 IIIC, SAYS SUP IS REQUIRED FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE EXCEEDING 500 SQUARE FEET AND THAT IS WHY WE LOOK AT THIS . THE SITE IS APPROXIMATELY 1.617 ACRES. IT IS SOUTH OF MILLER ROAD. HALFWAY BETWEEN THE GEORGE BUSH TOLLWAY -- CONDITIONS, YOU HAVE AN OVERHEAD MIGHT -- MAP AND A SITE PLAN.

INAUDIBLE ] LOCATED IN THE REAR YARD ALONG WITH A POLENTA SHED.

-- ALONG WITH A POOL AND A SHED.

[00:15:03]

CANNOT SEE THE BACKYARD AT ALL. A LOT OF GRASS BACK THERE. THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY IS PRETTY MUCH TREE-LINED.

THIS IS PRIMARILY FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

SF-40, THERE IS NO MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE. WHEN WE LOOK AT ZONING REQUIREMENTS, REAR YARD IS 54,000 SQUARE FEET ]. ABOUT 9.25% OF REAR YARD COVERAGE. WE WITHIN THE

REQUIREMENTS. YES, SIR. >> REAL QUICK, JUST TO CLARIFY .

LOT COVERAGE WISE IS ACTUALLY NOT JUST THE BUILDING BUT THE SLAB AND THE BUILDING, CORRECT? THAT NUMBER FOR -- WHERE YOU AT 920, SHOULD BE ABOUT 4140 BECAUSE OF THE SLAB?

>> I AM REFERRING TO READING THROUGH WHAT THE APPLICANT SAYS THEY WILL DO. WHAT YOU ARE TELLING ME IS, WE ARE DOING THAT SUP FOR JUST THE PORTION OF SLAB THAT WILL BE UNDERNEATH THE BUILDING. YET , IT WILL BE A SINGLE SLAB. OKAY.

>> HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING IS 14.5 FEET.

MEETS THE CHALLENGE OF A CHANGE IN CONDITION.

THERE IS NO THREAT TO THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC.

PROPERTIES IN THE VICINITY.

NOTICE WITHIN 200 FEET, WE HAD ZERO IN OPPOSITION , ZERO NEUTRAL . WE SENT OUT NOTICES TO 41 ADDRESSES.

[00:20:01]

THE RECOMMENDATION OF THIS BODY IS TO APPROVE, APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS, OR DENY. QUESTIONS?

>> THANK YOU, MR. KING. COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I GOT A COUPLE THE PACKET SAYS IT IS A 40X20 BUILDING , BUT IS IT 46÷20 OR 40÷20? BECAUSE YOUR PAPERWORK SAYS 46÷20 BUT HIS PAPERWORK SAYS 40÷20.

>> BUILDER'S PACKAGE THAT SAID IT WAS 40 BY 60. THE QUOTE FROM THE CONTRACTOR SAYS 40÷60. IT WILL BE 46 BY 20. I AM SORRY, 46 BY 20. OKAY, THAT IS THE ONLY POINT OF CLARIFICATION I WANTED TO

DISCUSS. >>

>> IS THE APPLICANT HERE ? DOES HE WANT TO PRESENT ANYTHING?

>> TO THE PODIUM. THIS IS FOR EVERYBODY ON TV CAN HEAR YOU.

>> I AM JOSHUA.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT ? I AM SORRY, WE LET HIM GO TOO FAST. NO? THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING, I WILL OPEN THE FLOOR FOR COMMENTS . SEEING NONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ENTERTAIN A MOTION. RTS. MR. POLLARD ?

>> I MOVE THAT WE APPROVED THE SUP AND SEND IT ON AS PRESENTED

. >> WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. POLLARD AND A SECOND BY MS. WILLIAMS TO APPROVE THIS SUP AS PRESENTED . ANY DISCUSSION ? SEEING NONE, CALL THE VOTE. THAT PASSES, 7-0. ITEM 4C, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND MAKE A

[4.C. Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council on a request by property owner, Steven Trahan, for consideration of Zoning Application #25-000103 for a Special Use Permit (SUP) to allow for the construction of an enclosed accessory structure with an area greater than 500 square feet on a property zoned Single Family Residential (SF-9). The site is approximately 0.50-acres addressed as 7405 Pennridge Circle, also described as Block A, Lot 2, of Altman No.1 Additon, in the City of Rowlett, Dallas County, Texas.]

RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON A REQUEST BY PROPERTY OWNER, STEVEN TRAHAN, FOR CONSIDERATION OF ZONING APPLICATION #25-000103 FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ENCLOSED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE WITH AN AREA GREATER THAN 500 SQUARE FEET ON A PROPERTY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. THE SITE IS APPROXIMATELY 0.50-ACRES ADDRESSED AS 7405 PENNRIDGE CIRCLE, ALSO DESCRIBED AS BLOCK A, LOT 2, OF ALTMAN NUMBER 1 ADDITON, IN THE CITY OF ROWLETT,

DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS. >> COMMISSIONERS , PLANNER 2, THE REQUEST IN FRONT OF YOU IS FOR AN ADDITIONAL SUP TO ALLOW FOR AND STRUCTURE OVER 500 SQUARE FEET , THE ACCESSOR STRUCTURE IN QUESTION TONIGHT -- PROPOSE TONIGHT IS ABOUT 1064 SQUARE FEET , AND IT IS ABOUT FOUR -- 14 FEET IN HEIGHT. PER THE ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE, SUP IS REQUIRED FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE EXCEEDING 500 SQUARE FEET WITHIN A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOME. AS YOU HAVE HEARD BEFORE . THE APPROXIMATELY

[00:25:03]

.5 ACRES IS LOCATED WEST OF KEYSER ROAD AND SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSED 7405 PENNRIDGE CIRCLE . THE EXISTING CONDITIONS THAT EXIST ON SITE TODAY IS A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME, 2300 SQUARE FEET , 192 SQUARE FOOT SHED, AND ABOUT 2100 FEET OF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE . THE APPLICANT INTENDS TO CONSTRUCT AGAIN THIS 1064 SQUARE FOOT OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURE FOR ADDITIONAL STORAGE . IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT A PORTION OF THAT ON THE NORTHWEST AREA OF THE PROPERTY LIES WITHIN A FLOODPLAIN. WE WILL SHARE SOME SITE PHOTOS WITH YOU ON THE CONDITIONS OF THE SITE TODAY. THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN FOR THIS AREA DESIGNATES IT AS STATE RESIDENTIAL WHICH MEANS LOTS OVER 20,000 SQUARE FEET, THIS IS INTENDED -- THE INTENT IS FOR LARGER LOTS, LOAD DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND FOR ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES TO SUPPORT THE HOMEOWNER'S NEEDS AND SUCH. THE ZONING DISTRICT FOR THIS AREA IS SINGLE-FAMILY , THE DISTRICT INTENDS TO ACCOMMODATE PRIMARILY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH A MINIMUM LOT AREA OF 9000 SQUARE FEET. NOW, THE CODE ASKED US -- WHEN LOOKING AT ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, THE CODE AS IS TO LOOK AT THREE PRIMARY THINGS, THE HEIGHT, SETBACK REQUIREMENTS, AND LOT COVERAGE, IN THIS CASE, WITHIN THE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT, IT TELLS US THAT THE LOT COVERAGE THAT IT CANNOT SURPASS IS 45% .

IN THIS CASE, THE LOT IS ABOUT 25,000 -- A LITTLE BIT OVER 21,000 SQUARE FEET, 45% OF THAT IS 9659, AS I MENTIONED, BEFORE, THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY HOUSES A PRIMARY HOME , A SHED, AND ABOUT 2100 SQUARE FEET OF PERVY SERVICE, IN ADDITION, THE OBJECT WAS TO ADD A ACCESSORY STRUCTURE PLUS ADDITIONAL CONCRETE AT ABOUT 600 SQUARE FEET . THE RESULT OF THIS IS ABOUT 30% LOT COVERAGE AT 6336, WHICH IS WELL BELOW THAT THRESHOLD OF 45%. THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IS APPROXIMATELY 14 FEET WHICH DOES NOT EXCEED THE HEIGHT OF THE O O PRIMARY STRUCTURE AT 30 FEET .

THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS IN THIS CASE, THE CODE TELLS US THAT, WHEN AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IS LOCATED TO THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY, IT IS -- THREE FOOT SETBACK IS REQUIRED. IN THIS CASE, THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE WOULD BE ABOUT 60 FEET FROM THE REAR PROPERTY LINE AND ABOUT FIVE FEET FROM THE NEAREST SITE SETBACK, WHICH IS THE EASTERN SIDE. PER SECTION 7711 OF THE ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE, IT TELLS US THE DEFINITION FOR AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IS PERMANENT BUILDING OR STRUCTURE AFFIXED TO THE GROUND, SUBORDINATE TO THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE, THE USE OF WHICH IS INCIDENTAL TO THE DOMINANT USE OR THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE ON THE PREMISE, IN THIS CASE, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO USE THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE TO STORE PERSONAL VEHICLES. ADDITIONALLY, THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IS SMALLER THAN THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE AND THE USE IS CLEARLY INCIDENTAL TO THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. AS YOU HAVE SEEN BEFORE, WE HAVE THE SAME REVIEW CRITERIA FOR SUP, IT STIPULATES THE CRITERIA THAT WE SHOULD FOLLOW BEFORE MAKING A RECOMMENDATION. ONCE WE DIVE DEEPER INTO THIS CRITERIA, WE TAKE A LOOK AT WHETHER IT ALIGNS WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WITH THE ZONING ORDINANCE, WHETHER THERE IS SOME TYPE OF CHANGE OR TREND THAT HAS CAUSED THIS PROPOSAL OR THIS NEED, WHETHER IT WILL IMPACT THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF THE COMMUNITY AND THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOODS, THE INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY, THIS IS ALREADY A DEVELOPED LOT, SO THERE IS INFRASTRUCTURE SERVING HAVE ANY IMPACT ON SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND LAST, IS THIS ASK SUITABLE FOR THIS PROPERTY WHEN IT COMES TO ZONING AND THE PROPOSED USE? WE SENT OUT A NOTIFICATION LETTER NOVEMBER 26 WITHIN 200 FEET AND 500 FEET BUFFERS AND RECEIVE ONE IN FAVOR WITHIN OUR 200 BUFFER AND TWO IN FAVOR WITHIN OUR 500 BUFFER.

TONIGHT, AS A RECOMMENDED BODY, MAY APPROVE , APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS, OR DENY THIS REQUEST.

>> THANK YOU . COMMISSIONERS, ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF? IS THE APPLICANT HERE? DO YOU WANT TO GIVE US A PRESENTATION OR

[00:30:01]

ANYTHING? >> I AM GLAD TO ANSWER ANY

QUESTIONS . >> OKAY . DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? SOUNDS GOOD. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING , I WANT TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. ANY INPUT? SEEING NONE , WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING . COMMISSIONERS, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. MS. WILLIAMS? I GUESS NOT. A MOTION BY MR. POLLARD AND A SECOND BY MR. TUCKER. WHAT IS THE MOTION.

RTS PLEASE? >> YES, I MOVE WE MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL AS PRESENTED BY THE APPLICANT,

THAT SUP . >> WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. POLLARD AND A SECOND BY MR. TUCKER. ANY DISCUSSION ON THE MOTION? YOU ARE EASY TONIGHT. SEEING NONE, WE WILL CALL THE VOTE. THAT PASSES, 7-0. WITH THAT, WE WILL -- WHAT DO WE DO? WE WILL ADJOURN THIS MEETING. THANK YOU.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.

Dec 09, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission

Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download Selected Item