Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:24]

>> THERE WAS A TIME WE HAD TO CALL YOU IN OFF YOUR DEATH BED TO A MEETING. IT'S SO NICE TO BE ABLE TO GET THIS STUFF DONE. NOW THE FIRST ITEM IS ELECT A

[2A. Election of a Vice Chair. ]

VICE CHAIR. I WILL OPEN THE FLOOR TO

NOMINATIONS FOR VICE CHAIR. >> I NOMINATE LISA.

>> DOESN'T REQUIRE A SECOND. NOMINATIONS FOR VICE CHAIR.

SEEING NONE, I'LL CLOSE. CONGRATULATIONS.

[2B. Discuss agenda items. ]

AGENDA ITEMS. >> WE'LL DISCUSS WE HAVE DATES HERE. JUST POINT OUT SPECIAL DATES.

WE HAVE JOINT MEETING WITH CITY COUNCIL AND ALSO THE MONTH OF DECEMBER WE WILL NOT HAVE A MEETING FOR A HOLIDAY MEETING NO, MEETING. ALSO PLEASE BE AWARE IF WE DON'T HAVE ANYTHING ON THE AGENDA WE WON'T HAVE A MEETING.

IF WE DON'T HAVE ANY APPLICATIONS FOR THAT MEETING DATE, THEN WE WILL NOT HAVE A MEETING.

THIS IS PROPOSED DATE. >> CAN I ASK A QUICK QUESTION AND MAYBE ANYWHERE ON THE FEBRUARY TRAINING SCHEDULE.

>> IT IS BEING HELD IN IRVING. WE WILL COORDINATE TO SEE HOW WE WILL HANDLE. THAT IT'S A DAY SESSION.

I KNOW REGISTRATION OPEN NOW. IF WE CAN GET INTEREST LEVEL, OTHERWISE I'LL LOOK DESPITE AND SEE HOW WE CAN FIGURE OUT --

>> FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE NEVER BEEN, IT'S A ONE DAY.

I HOPE RATHER THAN THE ONE EARLIER , THIS IS A ONE DAY DEAL AND IT'S YOU GO AND IF YOU'VE NEVER BEEN TO ONE BEFORE , THE FIRST ONE YOU HAVE TO GO TO IS THE OPEN MEETING TRAINING THAT LAST FOR ABOUT AN HOUR AND A HALF.

THEN YOU HAVE AN AFTERNOON SESSION.

AND IT'S SUPER INTERESTING, REALLY GOOD TRAINING AND FULFILLS OUR TRAINING REQUIREMENT.

IT DOESN'T COST US A BUNCH OF MONEY.

IT USED TO BE GARLAND. IT'S STILL A GOOD DEAL.

>> WE WILL SEND THE AGENDA TO ALL OF YOU SO YOU CAN TAKE A PEEK AT IT AND SEE WHAT YOU LIKE ON THAT AND CONTINUE TO TALK TO

THE OFFICE. >> WOULD ANYBODY BE INTERESTED

IN ATTENDING? >> WHAT DAY IS IT?

>> FEBRUARY RIGHT. >> I WILL LET EVERYBODY KNOW BY

EMAIL. >> IT'S ONE DAY IN FEBRUARY DURING THE WEEK. IF YOU CAN'T MAKE IT, YOU CAN'T

MAKE IT. >> I WOULD LIKE TO GO.

>> IT'S WORTHWHILE. >> FEBRUARY 8TH.

>> THAT'S A MONDAY? >> THAT'S A SATURDAY?

>> IT'S USUALLY DURING THE WEEK. >> I MIGHT HAVE THE WRONG DATE.

>> I NOINTS FEBRUARY. >> I'M SORRY IT'S FEBRUARY

SEVENTH FRIDAY. >> IT'S IN THE IRVING CONVENTION

CENTER. >> HOPEFULLY WE CAN GATE ADDED

TO OUR SCHEDULE. >> SOUNDS GOOD.

>> DID ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CALENDAR, ANY THOUGHTS OR CONCERNS ABOUT THE CALENDAR? WE WILL VOTE ON THIS ON IS THE

CONSENT AGENDA DURING A MEETING. >> THAT'S STILL THE SECOND AND

[00:05:03]

THE FOURTH RIGHT? >> YES.

>> I SEE. THAT'S 4B THERE.

>> FIRST ITEM WE HAVE IS 5A. CONDUCTING A PUBLIC HEARING AND MAKING A RECOMMENDATION IT'S PROVING A PLAN WITH MAJOR WARRANT FROM THE URBAN STANDARD. THIS IS RELATED TO PARKING ALLOCATION, CONTINUOUS BUILDING PLOTS, OPEN SPACE, RIGHT OF WAY.

AND THE PROPERTY IS SOUTH OF THE INTERSTATE.

WITH THIS ITEM -- >> WITH THIS ITEM THERE ARE FOUR REQUESTS. ONE OF THEM IS THE FIRST ONE IS REGARDING PARKING LOTS STREETSCAPE.

THE FORM BASE CODE ESSENTIALLY SAYS THAT PARKING LOTS NEED TO BE LOCATED BEHIND BUILDINGS. BECAUSE OF THE BLOCK SIZE AND THE ORIENTATION OF THE SITE, BECAUSE OF THE ADJACENT SI TO THE FRONTAGE ROAD, THESE PARKING LOTS ARE BEING PROPOSED ADJACENT TO THE I30 CORRIDOR AND EXCEED THE BLOCK SITE REQUIREMENTS.

ALSO EXCEED THE BUILDING FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS AS WELL.

AND SO THERE IS KIND OF A TRICKLE DOWN EFFECT ONCE YOU GIVE A WARRANT KIND OF AN OVER ARCHING WARRANT TO PARKING LOTS.

IT ALSO HAS IMPACT ON THE CONTINUOUS BUILDING FRONT REQUIREMENT IN THE CODE. THE CODE REQUIRES YOU PLACE BUILDINGS WITHIN THE BUILD TO ZONE WHERE THESE PURPLE LINES ARE. AND FILL 80% OF THE BLOCK WITH BUILDINGS. AND SO OBVIOUSLY IN THIS CASE IT'S FILLED COMPLETELY WITH PARKING LOTS.

THIS IS KIND OF BACKS UP TO THE I30 FRONTAGE ROAD.

THERE IS SIGNIFICANT GRADE CHANGE THERE.

THERE IS GOING TO BE BRIDGES AND FLYOVERS AS IT ALL COMES

TOGETHER. >> NOT ALL THIS LIKE COLORED BLOCKS HAVE NAMES ON THEM. I COULDN'T TELL WHERE PARKING

IS. >> THE LIGHT COLORED BLOCKS ARE BUILDINGS. THESE ARE THE PARKING LOTS.

THIS IS ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR THERE.

IS ANOTHER PARKING LOT HERE. AND WE'LL TALK ABOUT THEM IN ANOTHER WARRANT. WE'LL TALK ABOUT WHAT IS TRIGGERING THE WARRANT TO FIGURE OUT WHERE THAT FALLS IN THE CODE. FOR THE BLOCK ALONG I30, THAT WARRANT IS FOR THE ALLOWANCE FOR PARKING LOTS TO DOMINATE THE STREETSCAPE. THE SECOND WARRANT TALKS ABOUT PARKING LOTS ADJACENT TO THE SIDES OF THE BUILDING.

AND THIS IS BECAUSE YOU CAN'T PLACE THE PARKING FOR THOSE BUILDINGS BEHIND THE BUILDINGS BECAUSE THEY HAVE A DOUBLE FRONTAGE. AS AN EXAMPLE THIS BUILDING HERE FRONTS ALONG ENTIRE ROAD. IT ALSO FRONTS ALONG THE LAKEFRONT WHICH REQUIRES TRAIL ACCESS FOR AN ACCESS ALONG THE TRAIL. CAN'T BE PARK AGO JANE TO THE BUILDING OTHER THAN TO THE SIDE. AGAIN WE FALL BACK INTO THERE IS A PARK LOT ALONG THE STREETSCAPE.

YOU CAN SEE THIS PURPLE. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO PLACE BUILDINGS UP TO 80% OF THIS LENGTH HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE AND HERE. AND SO THOSE ARE KIND OF THE EFFECTS OF THE IMPACT OF THE MAJOR WARRANTS.

THE BENEFIT OF THESE WARRANTS AS FAR AS PLACING PARKING IN THESE LOCATIONS, THEY ARE LOCATED IN STRATEGIC LOCATIONS WHERE PEOPLE WILL BE ABLE TO GAIN PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE. SO THAT IS A BENEFIT.

THEY WOULD BE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE ALONG THAT RIGHT OF WAY TO UTFA MITIGATE FOR THE IMPACT ALONG THAT STREETSCAPE.

THOSE TWO WARRANTS. THE THIRD WARRANT HAS TO DO WITH TOWN HOMES THAT ALSO HAVE A DOUBLE FRONTAGE.

IN OTHER WORDS FRONT ON THE TRAIL, FRONT ON THE LAKE AND THEY REQUIRE A FRONT DOOR ACCESS TO THAT LAKE.

[00:10:05]

THEY HAVE A FRONTAGE ON THE INTERIOR ROAD THAT RUNS ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING. AS FAR AS PARKING THOSE GO OFF THE ROAD. IN THIS CASE IT'S UNIQUE BECAUSE OF THE LAKE CONDITION. YOU HAVE TO PICK AND CHOOSE WHERE YOU HAVE THAT GARAGE. SO THAT'S THE THIRD WARRANT.

AND THE FOURTH WARRANT HAS TO DO WITH THIS BUILDING HERE THAT IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY THAT HAS ANY OTHER REQUESTS FOR THEM TO PLACE A REAR FACADE FACING THE LAKE WHICH IS CODE. SIMILAR TO BIG BOX STORE WHERE YOU WOULD TYPICALLY JUST KIND OF HAVE A FACADE.

THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO LIMIT THAT PROJECT HUSBAND SERVICE RELATED FUNCTIONS ALONG THIS FACADE.

THAT WOULD INCLUDE DUMPSTERS, PARKING FAROOK ASSANGED.

UTILITY BOXES, LOADING ZONES AND FENCES.

WHAT THEY ARE TRYING TO DO IS ALLEVIATE THE NECESSITY FOR FRONT ENTRIES OUT ON TO THE TRAIL THEMSELVES.

STILL TREAT IT WITH A ARCHITECTURE TREATMENT WITH OPENINGS AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE AND NOT HAVE DUMPSTERS IN

THAT LOCATION. >> WHAT IS THAT LOT GOING TO BE?

>> AT THIS TIME AT THIS SCALE THE REGULATING PLAN, IT'S NOT DETERMINED WHO THESE USERS ARE GOING TO BE.

THIS IS MORE REPRESENTATIONAL OF GENERALLY WHERE THE FOOTPRINTS WILL BE. WHAT PARKING WILL BE AND SO WE DON'T HAVE ANSWERS TO WHO THIS MIGHT BECOME COULD BE RETAIL, THEATER, COULD BE DIFFERENT THINGS.

THAT IS SOMETHING WE WOULD GET INTO ONCE WE GET INTO THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. REGULATING IS MORE OF A FAZING OF THE ENTIRE SITE AND JUST SHOWING WHAT THAT FAZING LOOKS

LIKE. >> IT IDENTIFIES HOW THEY INTEND TO SPECIALLY PLAN THE DEVELOPMENT.

>> THIS STAGE IS DIFFICULT TO SIFT THROUGH BECAUSE THEY PROVIDED US WITH MORE DETAIL THAN WE TYPICALLY SEE IN REGULATING PLAN. TYPICALLY DON'T SEE BUILDING FOOTPRINTSFUL USUALLY IT'S JUST STREETS AND OPEN SPACE.

WE'VE TRIED TO SIFT THROUGH INFORMATION.

AT THIS SCALE, WHAT ARE THE MAJOR WARRANTS, WHAT ARE THE THINGS THAT DEVIATE FROM THE FORM BASE CODE KNOWING THAT TYPICALLY IF IT'S A THEATER, THAT THEATER DEVELOPER WILL COME TO US IN THE FUTURE. IF THERE IS ANY MAJOR WARRANTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING.

TYPICALLY WE'LL SEE THOSE INDIVIDUAL AS THE SITE GROWS OU.

>> SO YOU ARE SAYING THEY'VE AGREED TO CREATE A FAROOK ASSANGE FACING THE LAKE THAT IS NOT GOING TO LOOK LIKE THE BACK OF THE BUILDING. WHAT HAVE THEY PROMISED YOU?

>> I'LL GO BACK TO THE STATEMENT.

>> NO DUMPSTERS. NO PARKING.

UTILITY BOXES, LOADING ZONES AND FENCES.

>> AS FAR AS THE WAY THE FACADE OF THE BUILDING IS DESIGNED AND

LOOKS? >> SO THE CODE ESPECIALLY IN THIS DISTRICT REQUIRES A STORE FRONT ON THE GROUND LEVEL.

THAT REQUIRES A LOT OF GLASS, A LOT OF OPENINGS, LOT OF FRONT DOORS. FRONT DOOR EVERY 60 FEET.

ON A BIG BOX STORE THAT IS PROBABLY NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.

PROBABLY NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. AS FAR AS THE ENTRIES GOING OUT ON TO THE TRAIL, THAT'S NOT -- THAT'S THE WARRANT.

THEY DON'T WANT TO BE REQUIRED TO DO.

THAT AS FAR AS THE ARCHITECTURE TREATMENT THEY'VE COMMITTED NOT

TO PUT ANY DUMPSTERS. >> IS THIS GOING TO BE APPEALING

FROM THE LAKE. >> YOU ARE GOING TO GO OVER THIS

AGAIN THIS OUR MEETING. >> YES.

>> THOSE ARE THE FOUR WARRANTS. WE ARE RECOMMEND AING APPROVAL F THE WARRANTS. THEY ARE NOT COMPROMISING THE DISTRICT. WE HAVE DIFFERENT LEVELS OF APPROVAL. THAT'S WHY THE NEXT STEP THE

[00:15:02]

PROPOSED PLAN IS VERY MUCH IN ALIGNMENT WITH WHAT WAS IN THAT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. SO THAT IS THAT ONE.

IF YOU HAVE ANYMORE QUESTIONS WE CAN DO THAT DURING THE MEETING.

>> THE NEXT SOMEONE FOR DHI. PUBLIC HEARING FOR DHI FOR P. D.

WITH A CT DISTRICT AND FARM BASE URBAN VILLAGE DISTRICT USES.

TODAY THIS PROPERTY IS ZONED TWO ZONING DISTRICTS IT'S A C3 AND 02 AT THIS TIME. THEY ARE PROPOSING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY WITH A P.D. WHICH THEY WILL BRING THIS DEVELOPMENT TOGETHER BUT THEY WILL HAVE TWO SEPARATE TRACKS WITH TWO USE

TONS TRACK. >> IS IT PLATTED FOR TWO DIFFERENT -- ARE THE TRACKS AS INDICATED IN THE LAND USE PLAN S

THAT REFLECTIVE OF THE PLATTS? >> NO.

THE LAND IS UNPLATTED AT THIS TIME.

>> IT'S ONE BIG PARCEL? >> YES.

>> SO THE WAY OF OUR FUTURE PLAN IS IT'S DIVIDED.

RIGHT NOW IT'S JUST ONE BIG PARCEL?

>> IT IS. >> THEY ARE PROPOSING TWO DIFFERENT TRACTS AND I WOULD ASSUME IF THAT WERE TO BE APPROVED THEY WOULD HAVE TO GET IT PLATTED INTO TWO DIFFERENT

PLATTS WHY IS THAT CORRECT. >> THAT IS CORRECT.

THEY WOULD PLAT IT INTO TWO PLATS.

>> THEN THEY WOULD HAVE TO REPLAT THE PROPERTY?

>> THEY WOULD HAVE TO PLAT IT. >> BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE A PLAT.

>> SO THIS REZONING WILL BE FOR CHURCH CAMPUS AND ALSO FOR MULTIFAMILY A MAXIMUM OF 275 UNITS.

JUST A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE SITE AS WE DISCUSSED IT IS UNPLATTED AND IT IS ONE PARCEL THAT IS GOVERNED BY TWO ZONING DISTRICTS. IT DOES FALL UNDER THE FUTURE LAND USE AS MIXED USE. MIXED USE CALLS FOR INTEGRATION OF MIXED USES THAT COEXIST NEXT TO EACH OTHER.

AND ALSO IT ALLOWS -- IT CALLS FOR MULTIFAMILY UNITS IN THERE AS WELL AS FOR OUR MIXED USE DEFINITION IN THE CODE.

WHAT THEY PROPOSE TO DO ON THIS TRACT IS ABOUT 17 ACRES WILL BE THE CHURCH CAMPUS. THEY WANT TO DEVELOP IN PHASES.

SO THE FIRST PHASE WILL CONSIST OF 42,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING WITH PARKING SPACES AND TWO MONUMENT SIGNS AND INGRESS EGRESS OFF OF MAINSTREET. THE SECOND ADDITIONS TO THE BUILDING, COULD BE ANOTHER 60 SQUARE FEET OF WORSHIP, EDUCATIONAL AND POND THAT IS EXISTING ON THE SITE.

AND ALSO THERE IS A POTENTIAL LOT FOR SALE THAT COULD DEVELOP IN THE FUTURE. ALL IS UNDER C3 USES.

WHATEVER IS ALLOWED IN C3 COULD BE ALLOWED ON THIS LOT AS WELL.

ON THE SECOND TRACT THAT'S WHERE THEY WOULD PROPOSE THE MULTIFAMILY AND IT WOULD BE A MAXIMUM OF 275 UNITS.

THAT WOULD PROVIDE FOR SOME COMMERCIAL USES ON THE PROPERTY.

TRADITIONAL USES AS FAR AS THE LEASING OFFICE, CLUBHOUSE, ALSO THEY WOULD HAVE A DOG PARK AND OPEN FIELD.

NOW THERE ARE SOME CONSTRAINTS ON THE SITE THEY HAVE A TPL TEXAS POWER AND LIGHT STATION ON THIS PROPERTY.

IT LIMITS THE AVAILABILITY OF THE LAND.

THEY WILL BE WORKING AROUND THIS AREA AS THEY DEVELOP AS WELL WITH THIS SITE. ALSO TOO THEY PROPOSE TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY KEEP WITH THE PRIVACY OF THE NEIGHBORS BECAUSE THEY ARE LOCATED ABOUT 120 FEET AND BEYOND FROM EDGEWATER SUBDIVISION. AND SO THEY WILL INSTALL EXTRA LANDSCAPING, TREE AND AT MATURITY THEY WILL BE TALL ENOUGH TO STOP -- EXCUSE ME. LIVE SITE FROM THE BUILDING FROM THE BUILDING BECAUSE IT WILL BE A THREE STORY BUILDING.

THIS IS THE TRANSITION THAT THEY WILL HAVE TO ENSURE THERE IS PRIVACY. IT'S A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.

R2 IS SIMILAR TO OUR SF5 WITH DWELLING UNIT SIZE.

[00:20:06]

1500 FEET. 15,000 SQUARE FEET OF THE BUILDING AND WITH LOT WIDTH. SO IN THAT AREA IT IS LARGER LOTS. BUT THEY CAN HAVE A MINIMUM OF 150-1500 SQUARE FEET FOR THE DWELLING UNIT.

ONCE THIS PROPERTY STARTS TO DEVELOP, THEY WILL THE CHURCH OR THE DEVELOPER WILL FEET ALONG MAINSTREET.

AND THIS IS TO ACCOMMODATE A RIGHT TURN LANE ON TO PGBT AND MAINSTREET AS WELL. AT THIS TIME IT'S NOT PROPOSED TO HAVE AN ACCESS OFF OF PGBT BUT IT COULD BE A POSSIBILITY IN THE FUTURE. BUT IT'S NOT ASKED FOR AT THIS

TIME. >> I'M TRYING TO REMEMBER IS

THAT A FLAT PIECE OF LAND? >> IT'S GOT A CREST IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PROPERTY AND THEN IT SLOPES.

THERE IS KIND OF ASSORT OF DRAINAGE -- NOT A DRAINAGE BUT AREA THAT CAPTURES WATER TOWARDS PGBT AND SLOPES BACK DOWN TOWARD

THE LAKE ON THE OTHER SIDE. >> WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR THIS. IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE MIXED USE CATEGORY OF THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION AND SOME OF THE USES ARE SIMILAR TO THE EXISTING AREAS WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE

MULTIFAMILY. >> MULTIFAMILY WILL THAT BE --

WHERE WILL IT? >> ACROSS YOU KNOW THAT WHITE

HOUSE WHERE THE REC CENTER IS. >> IT'S CROSS THE STREET FROM THE ROWLETT COMMUNITY CENTER AND ALSO PARK.

AND ALSO THE CHURCH CAMPUS WILL BE DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM ROWLETT

HIGH SCHOOL. >> SO IT'S ALL INSTITUTIONAL USES THAT ARE ADJACENT TO THE AREA W. THE TRAFFIC IT WON'T BE A BIG CONCERN BECAUSE THE SCHOOLS WILL BE LETTING OUT DURING THE DAY WHERE THE CHURCH WILL BE USED DURING THE WEEKENDS

AND POSSIBLY EVENINGS. >> SO THE NEXT ONE THAT WE HAVE HERE IS FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ACCESSORY STRUCTURE THAT IS 29400 SQUARE FEET. IT'S ZONED SF40.

SO IT IS A LARGE LOT THAT IS 4.S STRUCTURE WOULD ALLOW FOR THIS USE WITHOUT IMPACTING THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORS BECAUSE IT IS SUCH A LARGE LOT. SO WITH THIS PROPERTY IT DOES ALREADY HAVE AN EXISTING STRUCTURE ON IT THAT'S 3559 WATER FEET AND 68 SQUARE FOOT STRUCTURE ON THERE ALREADY.

THE SITE IS ENCLOSED BY A 5 PRESIDENT 5-FOOT WIRE FENCE.

AND THEY DO HAVE ACCESS TO ROAD. IT IS SURROUNDED BY SINGLE FAMILY HOMES THAT ARE LARGER LOTS AND THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL THAT IS BEHIND IT. SO HERE AS YOU CAN SEE THE SITE PLAN SHOWS WHERE THE LOT WOULD BE, THE STRUCTURE WOULD BE LOCATED. IT WILL BE LOCATED IN THE REAR ABOUT 653 FEET FROM CHEESE AND FROM THE STRUCTURE ON SITE.

IT WILL BE 50 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST.

>> AS YOU CAN SEE ON THAT PLAN IT ACCOMMODATES A LARGE LOT.

IT WILL BE ABOUT 17 FEET HAD HEIGHT.

THERE ARE SOME SITE PHOTOS THAT WE HAVE.

THIS ONE WE ARE RECOMMEND AGO APPROVAL FOR THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT BECAUSE IT DOES NOT DISRUPT THE SF40 CONTEXT.

SO THE NEXT ONE WE HAVE IS DISCUSSING TWO MAJOR WARRANTS.

AND THE TWO MAJOR WARRANTS WILL BE TRANSPARENCY, PRIME FACADES AND SECONDARY. THEY WILL BE DEVELOPING A COMMERCIAL BUILDENING TO SITE. AND PROPOSE TO DO FAZING OF THIS

[00:25:03]

SITE AS WELL. TONIGHT WE WILL DISCUSS MAJOR WARRANT FOR THE BUILDING THEY ARE PROPOSING TO DO UNDER THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. WITH THE SITE THIS IS A MAJOR WARRANT. WE WILL RECOMMEND THAT THE APPLICANT POSSIBLY INCREASE THEIR PERCENTAGES THAT THEY ARE TRYING TO DEVIATE FROM. THAT WILL BE OUR RECOMMENDATION

FOR STAFF. >> THERE IS TWO MAJOR REQUESTS FOR THIS ONE. ONE HAS TO DO WITH THE TRANSPARENT SI REQUIREMENT WHERE THE FACADE IS ADJACENT TO EITHER A RIGHT OF WAY OR AN OPEN SPACE. IN THIS CASE SOUTH FRONTING AN OPEN SPACE. THIS IS A FUTURE ROADWAY CONNECTION. THESE TWO FACADES, IN THIS CASE THE SOUTH AND WEST FACADE REQUIRE A MINIMUM 60% TRANSPARENCY ON THE GROUND FLOOR.

IT'S STORE FRONT BECAUSE YOU ARE AT COMMERCIAL CENTER AND LOOKING AT A DENSE DISTRICT. ON THE REAR AND SIDE FACADE A AS WELL. OUR REQUIREMENT IS TO BRING IT UP FROM -- OUR RECOMMENDATION IS TO BRING IT UP FROM WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED TO HIGHER STANDARDS, UNDERSTANDING IT IS A DOG DAYCARE SERVICE. WE DO FEEL THAT BASED ON THE SITE PLAN, BASED ON THE FLOOR PLAN OF THE BUILDING , THE APPLICANT COULD INCREASE THAT TRANSPARENCY IN THE FRONT AREAS THAT ARE MORE OPEN AND SERVICE RELATED.

>> THAT WAS DISCUSSED WITH THEM? >> YES.

>> BUT THEY ARE STILL DENYING TO DO THAT?

>> YES. TO THEM THINKTH MAXIMUM THEY CAN DO. THAT'S WHY THE MAJOR WARRANT

REQUEST. >> AND ANOTHER TWO MINUTES.

>> WE CAN JUST DO THE OTHER ONE IN THERE UNLESS ANYONE HAS ANY

QUESTIONS. >> I THINK THAT LAST ONE IS GOING TO BE CONFUSING. YOU CAN'T ANSWER ANYTIME TWO MINUTES SO I THINK IT'S BEST WE WAIT UNTIL THE MEETING.

THE LAST ONE IS VERY COMPLICATED.

ANYBODY HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THE ITEMS TONIGHT OR ANYTHING ELSE? AT THIS TIME WE'RE GOING

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.