[4A. Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding proposed text amendments to the Rowlett Development Code, at Section 77-301, to allow an animal shelter within the Limited Commercial/Retail District (C-1), subject to approval of a Special use Permit (SUP) for animal shelter use.]

>> THAT PASSES. NEXT ITEM OR THE AGENDA FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION IS ITEM 4A.

CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENTS TO THE ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE AT SECTION 77-301 TO ALLOW AN ANIMAL SHELTER WITHIN THE LIMITED COMMERCIAL RETAIL DISTRICT C-1, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR ANIMAL SHELTER USE. MAKING THAT PRESENTATION THIS EVENING IS ALLISON, THE PLANNING MANAGER.

>> THANK YOU, GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS.

THE ITEM BEFORE YOU IS A PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE RELATED TO ANIMAL SHELTERS WITHIN THE C1 LIMITED COMMERCIAL RETAIL DISTRICT.

THE REQUEST IS TO AMEND SECTION 77-301 OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW AN ANIMAL SHELTER TO BE CONSIDERED WITHIN THE C1 DISTRICT THROUGH APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT.

THIS ITEM IS A RECOMMENDATION -- THE ITEM TONIGHT WE ARE REQUESTING A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO CITY COUNCIL. THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT WOULD NOT -- WOULD ADD ANIMAL SHELTERS AS AN SUP ELIGIBLE USE AS A C1 ZONING DISTRICT. IT WOULD NOT MAKE ANIMAL SHELTERS COMMITTED BY RIGHT. EACH REQUEST STILL REQUIRE ITS OWN SUP AND PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS.

THE SUP PROCESS ALLOWS THE CITY TO CONSIDER THE SURROUNDING AREA, THE SITE DESIGN, ACCESS, OPERATIONS, COMPATIBILITY AND ANY CONDITIONS THAT MAY BE APPROPRIATE FOR A PARTICULAR PROPERTY. THIS ITEM IS RELATED TO THE PROPOSED CITY ANIMAL SHELTER AT SHRADER ROAD.

THE SUP FOR THAT PROPERTY IS SEPARATE ACTIONS.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL THROUGH AN SUP WHILE PRESERVING INDIVIDUAL RECOVER AND PUBLIC HEARING FOR EACH REQUEST.

THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. I'LL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY

HAVE AT THIS TIME. >> ANY QUESTIONS COMMISSIONERS?

COMMISSIONER POLLARD. >> CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT A C1 IS ALSO CONSIDERED IN THE USES IN C1 FOR COMMERCIAL

[00:10:02]

NEIGHBORHOOD. IS THAT CORRECT?

>> I'M SORRY, I'M NOT UNDERSTANDING THE QUESTION.

>> C1 IS COMMERCIAL FOR NEIGHBORHOODS OR COMMERCIAL

AREAS NOT A C2? >> YES, SIR.

THE USES ALIGN MORE WITH THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL AREAS

FOR THESE SPECIFIC USES. >> OKAY.

SO, WHAT YOU'RE PROPOSING IS AN SUP TO BE PUT INTO A C1 ZONE THAT WHEREBY AN ANIMAL SHELTER CAN BE BY SUP, IT CAN GO IN ANY

C1 PROVIDING IT HAS AN SUP? >> THE PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT WOULD ACTUALLY JUST ALLOW FOR ANIMAL SHELTERS AS YOU SAID TO BE ALLOWED IN THE C1 DISTRICT GENERALLY.

HOWEVER, REGARDLESS OF THE LOCATION, A SUP WILL BE

REQUIRED. >> SO, DEFINE AN ANIMAL SHELTER

FOR ME. >> I ACTUALLY HAVE NOT INCLUDED THAT. WE HAVE A DEFINE IN OUR CODE.

I DO NOT HAVE IT ON THIS SLIDE EXACTLY.

I DON'T WANT TO MISQUOTE THE ORDINANCE AND ITS SPECIFIC

DEFINITION. >> COMMISSIONERS, WE'LL PULL THAT DEFINITION UP FOR YOU IN A SECOND.

BEAR WITH US.

COMMISSIONERS IT'S CONSIDERED A KENNEL NOT AN ANIMAL SHELTER.

THAT'S WHY WE'LL PULL UP THE DEFINITION FOR YOU.

IT'S CONSIDERED A KENNEL. CORRECT.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? >> YES, COMMISSIONER POLLARD.

>> OKAY, MY CONCERN IS THROWING THIS BACK OUT IS THAT IF AN ANIMAL SHELTER WITH AN SUP OR CAN BE IN ANY C1 IN ANYWHERE IN THE CITY AS LONG AS IT'S ACCOMPANIED WITH AN SUP?

CORRECT? >> YES, SIR.

CONSIDERED ON CASE BY CASE BASIS.

>> ONCE AN SUP GOES TO A PIECE OF PROPERTY, IT IS THERE FOR

FIVE YEARS? >> I DON'T BELIEVE FIVE YEARS.

>> THE SUP ZONING ACTION. THE ZONING GOES WITH THE LAND USE. ZONING CHANGED AND SUP IS

REPEALED. >> THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER POLLARD. COMMISSIONER BLAYDES.

WHAT AN SPCA BE AN ANIMAL SHELTER?

>> I'M NOT SURE WITH THAT BUSINESS.

>> WE WOULD HAVE TO IDENTIFY THE USES ASSOCIATED WITH IT.

I'M NOT COMPLETELY FAMILIAR WITH THE USES IN THE SPCA.

IF YOU BEAR WITH US FOR A SECOND.

WE'LL PULL UP THE DEFINITION OF ANIMAL SHELTER.

>> THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER BLAYDES.

>> ONE QUICK QUESTION. THIS CHANGE, WOULD THIS ONLY AFFECT THE ANIMAL SHELTER FOR THE CITY? WILL A PRIVATE ORGANIZATION OPEN UP IN THE CITY.

OR IS THIS ONLY FOR THE CITY?

>> THAT WOULD NEED TO BE ADDRESSED IN THE DEFINITION

HERE. >> THE PURPOSE OF THE FUNNEL IN -- ITEM IS TO PROPOSE STAFF, THE CITY IS PROPOSING TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE. ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE HAS A SCHEDULE OF COMMITTED USES. ASSOCIATED WITH THE USES IS AN ACTION THAT FOR CERTAIN LAND USES REQUIRES APPROVAL THROUGH

[00:15:03]

THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT AN SUP.

THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU STATES THAT A TEXT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW AN ANIMAL SHELTER IN THE C1 DISTRICT ONLY WITH THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS FOR AN ANIMAL SHELTER. IT WON'T BE ANY C1 DISTRICT THAT WOULD ALLOW THE USE. IT WOULD REQUIRE APPROVAL OF AN SUP. RECOMMENDATION FROM YOURSELF AND AN ACTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL. AN ANIMAL SHELTER BY THE ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE, I DO WANT TO PROVIDE SOME CONTEXT.

THE LARGER BROADER UMBRELLA FOR SOME OF THE CITY USES IS A COMMUNITY FACILITY. A COMMUNITY FACILITY INCLUDES BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES OR FACILITIES OWNED, OPERATED OR OCCUPIED BY GOVERNENTAL PHILANTHROPIC AGENCIES.

THE SPECIFIC USE IS NOT LIMITED TO THIS ANIMAL SHELTER.

WHICH IS A PERMANENT FACILITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF COLLECTING AND IMPOUNDING STRAY, WILD AND OR UNCLAIMED ANIMALS, REPTILES, ETCETERA. BOTH DOMESTIC AND NONDOMESTIC.

WITH THAT, I'LL TRY TO ANSWER MORE QUESTIONS.

>> THANK YOU. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY MORE QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER BLAYDES.

>> I GUESS SPCA WOULD BE ALLOWED.

THAT'S PHILANTHROPIC. >> WITH THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS.

CORRECT. >> THANK YOU.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. IF NO ONE HAS ANY FURTHER QUESTION OF ALLISON, I WILL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THIS TIME. DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKERS? I LIKE TO CLARITY FOR THIS PUBLIC HEARING THAT WE HAVE ANOTHER ITEM FOR THE ANIMAL SHELTER.

THIS IS JUST A TEXT AMENDMENT TO OUR ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE.

IF YOU WANT TO SPEAK TO THE TEXT AMENDMENT THEN THE PUBLIC HEARING IS OPEN NOW. IF YOU WANT TO SPEAK ON BOTH, YOU'LL HAVE TO FILL OUT TWO CARDS.

DO WE HAVE SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM?

>> WE ASKED MOST OF THEM WANTED TO SPEAK ON 4B.

>> OKAY. THEN, WITH NO ONE SPEAKING, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. DO I HAVE A MOTION? COMMISSIONERS? COMMISSIONER HERNANDEZ.

>> I LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE AS WRITTEN.

>> THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER. DO I HAVE A SECOND? NO SECOND. YOUR MOTION FAILS.

WE DO HAVE A SECOND? JOBE SECONDS.

ANY DISCUSSION? I HAVE SOMETHING I WOULD LIKE TO SAY. GO AHEAD, COMMISSIONER

[00:20:01]

HERNANDEZ. >> JUST AS A GENERAL THOUGHT BEHIND THIS, I ACTUALLY DON'T MIND THIS TEXT AMENDMENT PERSONALLY BECAUSE I THINK THIS IS -- BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE SUP PROCESS, IT REQUIRES PUBLIC HEARING.

I DON'T CONSIDER 4A A BAD IDEA. I THINK THAT'S ACTUALLY A GOOD IDEA THAT WAY WE HAVE MORE INPUT AS TO WHERE THE CITY MAY WANT TO PLACE AN ANIMAL SHELTER. THAT'S MY THOUGHT.

>> THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER HERNANDEZ.

I DON'T THINK WE HAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION TO MAKE A DECISION ON THIS ITEM TONIGHT. I WOULD LIKE TO TABLE IT.

>> OKAY. SO, I WOULD LIKE TO SEEN THIS ACTUALLY DIVIDED UP TWO PARTS. ONE FOR THE C1 AND THE SECOND ONE FOR AN SUP. I HAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH THE REZONING OF THE PROPERTY BEING C1.

I HAVE A REAL PROBLEM AT THIS POINT IN TIME WITH THE SUP.

>> WE HAVE TO BE CLEAR STICKING TO THE ACTION ITEM FOR 4A AND NOT DELVE INTO THE MATTER SUBSEQUENT TO THIS.

>> SURE. I'M LOOKING AT 4A, WHICH IS C1 GOING TO C1 AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT.

>> CORRECT, JUST TO CLARIFY WE DON'T -- SEEN IT SEPARATED. I SEE THE PROPERTY GOING TO C1

BUT NOT THE SPECIAL USE PORTION. >> THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER POLLARD. COMMISSIONER WILSON.

>> IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE SECOND ONE WAS A PUT OF THAT RIGHT? AS FAR AS THAT SUP.

THAT IS MY UNDERSTANDING. IS THAT INCORRECT? WHEN YOU SAY -- ISN'T IT IN ITS ENTIRETY ALREADY? WHEN HE SAYS HE WANTS IT BROKEN DOWN INTO TWO?

>> COMMISSIONERS, ALLOW ME TO TRY TO CLARIFY AND I WILL TRY MY BEST. PLEASE ASK ME ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE. THE FIRST ITEM ON YOUR AGENDA THAT YOU ARE ACTING ON OWHICH THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED, 4A, ADDRESSING THE TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE. THAT IS THE ONLY ITEM THAT IS ON THE TABLE RIGHT NOW. THE TEXT AMENDMENT TO ALLOW AN AIM SHELTER WITH AN SUP.

>> THIS TEXT AMENDMENT ONLY APPLIES CITYWIDE, TO THESE TWO

LOCATIONS. >> CORRECT.

>> THIS NEXT AMENDMENT IS APPLICABLE TO THE ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH WILL BE APPLICABLE TO PROPERTIES THAT FALL WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT CODE PARAMETERS.

>> IANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? >> YES.

I GUESS COMPLETE WHAT I'M SAYING IS REGARDLESS OF WHERE A C1 PIECE OF PROPERTY IS IN THE CITY.

I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THOSE BEING THERE IN THAT CATEGORY. NOT AN SUP FOR AN ANIMAL SHELTER IN THE C1. MAYBE IT BELONGS IN THE C2.

BUT NOT A C1. >> THANK YOU COMMISSIONER

[00:25:01]

POLLARD. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE TABLE FROM COMMISSIONER HERNANDEZ TO APPROVE SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER JOBE.

TIME TO VOTE. OH, I TAKE BACK THE VOTE.

COMMISSIONER BLAYDES HAS A COMMENT.

>> I THOUGHT YOU MADE A MOTION TO TABLE.

>> WELL, WE HAVE TO KILL THE FIRST MOTION AND START OVER.

>> OKAY. >> WE HAVE TO TAKE A VOTE ON THE FIRST MOTION AND THEN I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO TABLE.

IS THAT RIGHT, COUNSEL? >> CORRECT.

LET ME HELP FACILITATE THE PROCESS AND CITY ATTORNEY IS HERE TOO. THERE'S ALREADY A MOTION ON THE TABLE TO APPROVE THE REQUEST AND IT HAS BEEN SECONDED.

NEXT ACTION IS TO TAKE A VOTE ON THAT AND DEPENDING ON THE

OUTCOME, NEXT STEPS. >> OKAY.

SHALL WE TAKE A VOTE AT THIS TIME? THE MOTION FAILS. 4-3.

AT THIS TIME, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO TABLE THIS ITEM UNTIL WE GET FURTHER INFORMATION.

DO I HAVE A SECOND? TAKE THAT BACK.

[4B. Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding a City-initiated rezoning for an approximately 4.2114 acre tract of land generally described as Block 1, Lot 2, Joy Lutheran Church Addition and an approximately 4.2214 acre tract Of land generally described as Block 1, Lot 1, Joy Lutheran Church Addition, an addition of the City of Rowlett, Dallas County, Texas, and being generally known as 8502 and 8602 Schrade Road, respectively, from the Single-Family Residential — 10/21 District (SF-IO) to the Limited Commercial/Retail District with a Special Use Permit allowing animal shelter use (C-I-SUP) on the lot located at 8502 Schrade Road. (Part 1 of 2)]

NEXT ITEM ON AGENDA IS ITEM 4B. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING A CITY INITIATED REZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 8.43 ACRES LOCATED 8502 AND SCHRADE ROAD TO THE C1 LIMITED COMMERCIAL RETAIL DISTRICT AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW AN ANIMAL SHELTER USE 8502 SCHRADE ROAD. THE PLANNING MANAGER WILL MAKE

THE PRESENTATION. >> WE'RE GOOD TO GO.

THE ITEM BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS A CITY INITIATED REZONING AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR APPROXIMATELY 8.43 ACRES AT 8502 AND 8602 SCHRADE ROAD. THE CAN IS TO REZONE BOTH PROPERTIES FROM SF10 TO T1 AND CONSIDER SUP FOR ANIMAL SHELTER AT 8502 SCHRADE ROAD. IT INCLUDES TWO CITY OWNED PROPERTIES, WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY 4.21 ACRES AND CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED. THEN, 8 8602 SCHRADE ROAD.

THE SURROUNDING AREA INCLUDES A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND PUBLIC USES. THE MAP SHOWN HERE SHOWS THE EXISTING ZONING ON THE LEFT AND THE PROPOSED ZONING ON THE RIGHT. BOTH PROPERTIES ARE CURRENTLY ZONED SINGLE FAMILY TEN AND ARE PROPOSED FOR REZONE TO COMMERCIAL ONE OR THE C1 ZONING DISTRICT.

THE ANIMAL SHELTER SUP WOULD APPLY ONLY TO THE PROPERTY 8502 SCHRADE ROAD. FIRST, BACKGROUND IN MAY 2023, ROWLETT VOTERS AUTHORIZED AN $8.4 MILLION BOND FOR AN ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITY AND THEN EARLIER THIS YEAR, COUNCIL DIRECTED STAFF TO EVALUATE ALTERNATIVE LOCATES AT WHICH TIME THEY IDENTIFIED 8502 SCHRADE ROAD AS A POTENTIAL

[00:30:03]

SITE. STAFF EVALUATED WHETHER THE C1 ZONING DISTRICT WILL BE APPROPRIATE FOR THESE PROPERTIES. IT TO BE NOTED THAT THE DISTRICT IS SPEDDED FOR COMMUNITY SERVING USES AND BETTER REFLECTS THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED NONRESIDENTIAL USE OF THE CITY OWNED PROPERTIES. IT WOULD ALSO EXTEND THE EXISTING C1 ZONING ALONG THE SCHRADE ROAD CORRIDOR.

C1 IS THE CITY'S LIMITED COMMERCIAL/RETAIL DISTRICT AND MAY ACCOMMODATE COMMUNITY SERVING USES NEAR RESIDENTIAL AREAS. IT IS ALSO SUSCEPTIBLE TO APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

THE PROPOSED SHELTER SITE IS APPROXIMATELY 745 FEET DEEP WHICH WOULD PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR SEPARATION FROM THE NEARBY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES.

IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE SITE LAYOUT HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED AND WOULD BE EVALUATED THROUGH THE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS. THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT COMPONENT IS GOING TO BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY AS WE'VE NOTED.

THE REZONING WOULD NOT AUTHORIZE THIS ANIMAL SHELTER USE.

THE SUP WOULD PROVIDE THAT SITE SPECIFIC REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED USE AND WOULD ALSO ALLOW FOR CONSIDERATION OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS AS WELL AS APPROPRIATE CONDITIONS AS NECESSARY.

BECAUSE THIS PROPERTY IS WITHIN 300 FEET OF A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT. THE CITY'S NEIGHBORHOOD PROTECTION STANDARDS APPLY AND THESE ITEMS WILL ADDRESS NOISE, OUTDOOR ACTIVITY, LIGHTING, AND HOURS OF OPERATION.

NOISE HAS SPECIFICALLY BEEN CONSIDERED DUE TO THE PROPOSED USE AND IT'S ADJACENCY TO THE FIRE STATION.

PROFESSIONAL SOUND STUDY TO BE CONDUCTED WHICH WILL BE COMPLETED AS THE PROJECT CONTINUES TO MOVE THROUGH THE DESIGN. AS MENTIONED THAT COUNCIL WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE. ADDITIONALLY, STAFF CONDUCTED AN ON SITE NOISE EXERCISE AT THE SIX MARKED LOCATIONS ON THE PROPERTY. INCLUDING MEASUREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FIRE TRUCK AND AMBULANCE SIRENS TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL CONTEXT REGARDING THE EXISTING NOISE CONDITIONS.

STAFF ALSO PROVIDED THE FIRE STATION RUN NUMBERS SINCE OCTOBER 1, 2025. FIRE STATION TWO HAS RECEIVED APPROXIMATELY 2200 CALLS FOR SERVICE.

AVERAGING. SIX TO SEVEN VEHICLE RESPONSES PER DAY.

IF THE PROJECT WERE TO MOVE FORWARD.

NOISE GENERATING ACTIVITIES, SERVICE AREAS AND SIMILAR SITE FEATURES WOULD BE LOCATED AND SCREENED TO MINIMIZE ANY IMPACTS AND POTENTIAL NUANCES ON NEARBY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES WERE FEASIBLE. ANOTHER CONSIDERATION HAS BEEN THE HOURS OF OPERATION IN LIGHTING.

THE ANIMAL SHELTERS PUBLIC HOURS ARE TUESDAY THROUGH SATURDAY FROM 10:00 A.M. TO 5:00 P.M. WITH STAFF PRESENT SEVEN DAYS A WEEK TO DO ANIMAL CARE AND FACILITY OPERATIONS.

EXTERIOR LIGHTING WILL BE DOWN LIT AND REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE STANDARD WELL LIT DEVELOPMENT CODE REQUIREMENTS.

THE SITE PLAN SHOWN HERE IS FOR ILLUSTRATED PURPOSES ONLY.

IS NOT BEING APPROVED WITH THIS REQUEST.

THE PROJECT WOULD STILL REQUIRE THE FULL DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS AND AT THAT TIME, CONSIDER THE REVIEW FOR ACCESS, UTILITIES, DRAINAGE, LANDSCAPING, SCREENING, LIGHTING AND ALL OF OTHER APPLICABLE STANDARDS.

PUBLIC NOTICE WAS SENT OUT FOR THIS ITEM ON SEPTEMBER 4TH OF THIS YEAR. WITHIN 200 FEET, STAFF SENT OUT 29 PUBLIC NOTICE LETTERS AND RECEIVED ONE IN.

OPPOSITION OF THE REQUEST AND ZERO IN FAVOR.

STAFF SENT OUT 82 COURTESY NOTICES WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE PROPOSED REQUEST AND RECEIVED BACK FOUR LETTERS IN OPPOSITION AND ONE IN FAVOR. ADDITIONALLY, TO THAT, STAFF RECEIVED TEN CITIZEN INPUT FORMS SUBMITTED THROUGH OUR CITY

[00:35:02]

WEBSITE. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REZONING FROM SF10 TO C1 AND APPROVAL OF THE SUP FOR A CITY OPERATED ANIMAL SHELTER AT 85022 SCHRADE ROAD.

COMMISSION MAY RECOMMEND APPROVAL, APPROVAL WITH CONDITION OR DENIAL CITY COUNCIL.

THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU, ALLISON. ANY QUESTIONS COMMISSIONERS?

>> I HAVE POINT OF ORDER. >> COMMISSIONER POLLARD.

>> ORDER TO THE CITY ATTORNEY. SINCE 4A WAS DENIED AND SENSE THE C1 CATEGORY SUGGESTING TO COUNCIL THE SUP DO NOT F APPLY O C1. CAN WE CONSIDER SUP ON C1 THAT DOESN'T EXIST? FOR THIS PURPOSE, THE SUP GOES AWAY.

WE CAN TALK ABOUT THE C1? >> I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE NEED TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION. WE CAN DO THAT

[Additional Item]

>> WELCOME BACK. IT'S 7:51.

WE'RE RECONVENING PLANNING AND ZONING.

WE HAD QUESTIONS FOR ALLISON. WOULD YOU PLEASE CLARIFY EXACTLY WHAT YOU ASKING THIS COMMISSION TO CONSIDER?

>> YES MA'AM. ITEM 4B, THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE BOTH PROPERTIES 8502 SCHRADE ROAD AND 8 8602 SCHRADEO THE C1 ZONING DISTRICT. TO ALLOW AN ANIMAL SHELTER BE PERMITTED -- FOR THE 8502 TO ALLOW AN SUP FOR AN ANIMAL SHELTER. THAT IS FOR ITEM 4B TOGETHER.

THAT IS THE CONSIDERATION. BOTH PROPERTIES ARE PROPOSING REZONE TO C1 WHEREAS ONLY 8502 SCHRADE UNDEVELOPED PARCEL WILL

BE CONSIDERED FOR AN SUP. >> THANK YOU.

COMMISSIONERS ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?

COMMISSIONER JOBE. >> SO, I GUESS ONE OF MY CONCERNS IS -- I WISH WE DID HAVE THE INFORMATION AS FAR AS THE DECIBELS AND THE FIRE STATION.

THAT ACTUALLY BOTHERS ME LESS. WHAT MORE CONCERNS ME IS THE NEIGHBORHOODS. SOMETHING LIKE VERY SIMILAR HAPPENED TO ME IN ARKANSAS WHERE THERE WAS A SUBDIVISION AND ANIMAL SHELTER WAS PUT IN PLACE. WHAT HAPPENED WAS IF I WAS GOING OUT AT 9:00 A.M. FOR MY CUP OF COFFEE AND THEN THAT'S WHEN THEY LET ALL THE ANIMALS OUT IN THE CAGES.

THAT NOISE, THE CONSTANT BARKING WAS DISRUPTIVE TO THE COMMUNITIES. LITERALLY.

THEY HAD DONE BEAUTIFUL WALLS AND TREES BUT WHEN YOU GOT -- I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAVE THE ANSWER TO THAT HOW MANY TIMES A DAY THE DOGS COME OUT. THE I NOT SHELTER -- THE KNOW THE SHELTER IS OPEN FROM 8:00 TO 5:00.

THAT'S MY CONCERN WITH THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.

WHEN THE DOGS GO OUT THEY SKI A SQUIRREL, ALL OF SUDDEN, THEY ARE BARKING 24/7. THEY WERE PROBABLY HALF MILE AWAY FROM WHERE MY SUBDIVISION WAS.

THAT IS MY BIGGEST CONCERN IS THE LOCATION OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER BASED ON WHERE THE PROPERTIES ARE.

I DIDN'T KNOW IF WE HAD INFORMATION HOW MANY TIME THE

[00:40:02]

DOGS COME OUT DURING THE DAY OR HOW THAT WORKS.

IF YOU CAN ANSWER THAT QUESTIONL SHELTER FOR SPECIFIC QUESTIONS.

>> COMMISSIONER, I WILL TRY TO ANSWER ALL YOUR QUESTIONS.

WE MET WITH OUR ANIMAL SERVICES -- ANIMAL SERVICES DIVISION MANAGER KHALIL MORRIS TO ASK THESE QUESTIONS.

THEY DEAL WITH THESE ANIMALS VERY INTIMATELY IN TERMS OF THEIR ROUTINE. QUESTION NUMBER ONE WAS HOW MANY HOURS DO THE DOGS SPEND OUTDOORS.

WEATHER PERMITTING THE DOGS SPEND ABOUT FIVE HOURS DAY OUTSIDE. THIS CAN DEPENDS VERY MUCH ON THE WEATHER. ON AVERAGE IT'S ABOUT FIVE HOURS A DAY. WHAT WAS YOUR NEXT QUESTION?

I THINK YOU HAD TWO. >> WHAT THE CONSIDERATION IF THAT WAS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT, HOW MANY TIMES OFFICERS WERE LET OUT THERE AND IF THAT WAS TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION AS FAR AS THE NOISE LEVELS AND IF ANY RESEARCH WAS DONE.

MY PAST EXPERIENCE THAT WAS VERY DISTURBING FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

>> SURE. ONE OF THE QUESTIONS -- YOU ASK A VERY VALID QUESTION. COMMENTARY ASSOCIATEDEDDED WITH THAT ESPECIALLY IT'S ALSO MEMORIALIZED IN THE STAFF REPORT WHEN WE TALK ABOUT NEIGHBORHOOD PROTECTION STANDARD.

BECAUSE OF THE USE ITSELF HAVING ADJACENT SEAT TO A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, THERE'S SPECIFIC NEIGHBORHOOD STANDARD REQUIREMENTS THAT HAS TO BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION.

ALTHOUGH, WE DO NOT HAVE A FULL-BLOWN SITE PLAN AT THIS TIME. WE HAVE ILLUSTRATED DIAGRAM THAT DESCRIBES THE SPATIAL ASPECTS OF THE BUILDING OR THE USE IN RELATIONSHIP TO THAT PROPERTY AND THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES.

WE WILL ALSO DURING SITE PLAN REVIEW TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE PLACEMENT OF THE OUTDOOR KENNELS OR THE PARKING OR OUTDOOR WALKING OF THE ANIMALS, FOR EXAMPLE.

ONE OF THE QUESTIONS YOU MANIPULATIONED WAS NOISE.

ONE OF THE COMPONENT AS PART OF THIS PROGRAM IS TO HAVE OUR CONSULTANT CONDUCTING NOISE STUDIES.

WE ARE TAKING TOO CONSIDERATION THOSE VERY ASPECTS NOT JUST THE FIRE STATION ADJACENT TO THE ANIMAL SHELTER BUT ALSO THE ANIMAL SHELTER AND ITS ADJA ADJACENCY.

>> THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER WHITE.

>> WHY YOU CHANGING THE ZONING FOR THE FIRE STATION?

>> BECAUSE THE C1 ZONING DISTRICT BETTER FITS THE USE OF THE FIRE STATION THERE WHERE IT IS CURRENTLY ZONED SF10.

THE ZONING DOESN'T REALLY APPLY AND MATCH WITH THE ACTUAL USE OF

THE LAND AS A FIRE STATION. >> WHICH IS SOMETHING YOU GUYS

TRY TO FIX SOMETHING? >> YES, WITH THESE BOTH BEING TWO CITY OWNED PROPERTIES. IT IS A CORRECTION AND THEN A POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITY TO ALSO UTILIZE THE ADJACENT PROPERTY

FOR A SIMILAR USE. >> THANK YOU.

>> I HAD ONE QUESTION. IN YOUR PRESENTATION, YOU MENTIONED THERE WERE SEEKING ALL ALTERNATE LOCATIONS.

WAS THERE A PRIMARY CONSIDERED? >> THAT'S JUST THE BACKGROUND INFORMATION THAT THERE WAS DISCUSSION OF ALTERNATE

LOCATIONS. >> WE HAVE ENGAGED OUR CONSULTANT. THEY HAVE CONDUCTED NUMEROUS PHASES OF THIS PROGRAM. ONE OF WHICH WAS TO LOOK AT MULTIPLE PROPERTIES, UNDERSTAND THEIR APPLICABILITY FROM ENTRY POINTS TO RAILWAYS ACITY SEATS. AS THAT PROGRAM WAS UNDER WAY, THE PARCELS THAT THEY IDENTIFIED OF THOSE PARCELS THEY NARROWED THOSE PARCELS DOWN TO 16 AND IT CONSISTENT OF THE ANIMAL SERVICES OR THE ANIMAL SHELTER. THE PUBLIC SAFETY AND MUNICIPAL

[00:45:04]

COMPLEX. THERE HAVE BEEN A FEW COUNCIL MEETINGS WHERE WE BROKEN UP THE PROGRAM TO MAKE SURE AND KEEPING WITH OUR OPPORTUNITIES TO PROVIDE MUNICIPAL SERVICES AND ONE OF THESE PARCELS IS THE SCHRADE ROAD PROPERTY.

THE ASSESSMENT CONTINUES. IN-DEPTH OF THE PARCELS INCLUDING THIS ONE WILL CONTINUE.

HOWEVER, LET'S ASSUME THAT THIS PROPERTY IS SELECTED OR CHOSEN OVER THE ACTIONS PROPOSED IN FRONT OF YOU DO OCCUR.

>> THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER POLLARD.

>> MRS. KAY, SINCE ITS BEEN BROUGHT YOU, BETWEEN YOU AND MENAL BEFORE WE OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING SO PEOPLE UNDERSTAND WHAT'S GOING ON AND WHY TWO PIECES OF PROPERTY AND ONE OF THEM IS THE FIRE STATION CURRENTLY.

CAN YOU GIVE US A LITTLE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND ON WHAT HAPPENED THAT THE FIRE STATION IS THERE.

WE OWN ANOTHER PIECE OF PROPERTY NEXT DOOR.

IT'S STILL SF10. WHICH IS SINGLE FAMILY 10,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT VERSUS HAVING BEEN CHANGED BECAUSE OF THE

BUILDING OF FIRE STATION? >> THAT'S PRIOR TO MY TIME HERE.

I WILL PASS THAT OFF. >> I WANT TO STAY WITH THE GENERAL ITEM. I NEED TO SEEK ATTORNEY COUNSEL

FOR ANSWER TO THE QUESTION. >> I THINK SHE WANTED TO

CONTINUE. >> COMMISSIONER POLLARD IS REQUESTING HISTORICAL REFERENCE ASSOCIATED WITH THE HISTORICAL ZONING OF THE PROPERTY. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE IN REMNANT OF ANSWERING THE QUESTION.

>> I HAVE A QUESTION BACK TO CITY ATTORNEY.

WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE LAND, ZONING CHANGE FROM SF10, SINGLE FAMILY, 10,000 SQUARE FOOT ZONE CURRENTLY TO A C1, COMMERCIAL ZONE. I GUESS WHAT I'M ASKING FOR IS BEFORE WE OPEN UP PUBLIC HEARING, SO THAT THE PUBLIC UNDERSTANDS AND KNOWS THE BACKGROUND OF WHY THERE IS A REQUEST FROM A SINGLE FAMILY TO THE C1 ESPECIALLY THE PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT IS CURRENTLY FIRE STATION.

MAYBE IT WON'T HELP. I THINK IT WOULD HELP.

>> I WILL ANSWER THAT QUESTION. I WANTED TO MAKE SURE I CLEARLY UNDERSTOOD THE QUESTION. I DID NOT AT FIRST.

THE FIRE STATION PROPERTY IS ZONE SINGLE FAMILY WHEN THE FIRE STATION WAS CONSTRUCTED IT WAS NOT REZONED TO ANYTHING OTHER THAN SINGLE FAMILY, TECHNICALLY ACCORDING TO THE ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE, THE USE IS PERMITTED BY RIGHT.

THIS MUNICIPAL SERVICES PERMITTED BY RIGHT.

HOWEVER, ADJACENT CITY OWNED PROPERTY WHICH WAS PART OF THE SUBJECT CASE, ZONED SINGLE FAMILY 10, THE IMMEDIATE PROPERTY, THE ADJACENCY TO THE EAST.

PROP A OF ZONING ALONG SCHRADE ROAD.

THE LOGICAL ZONING EXTENSION WILL BE C1 IN THIS INSTANCE.

IT WOULD ALSO BRING THE TWO CITY EVEN OWNED PROPERTY INTO A CLASSIFICATION MORE ANTHONY OR SUITED FOR THE SUBJECT SITES.

>> THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?

[00:50:03]

COMMISSIONER JOBE. YOU HAVE QUESTION? I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THIS TIME.

>> WE HAVE QUITE A FEW. WE'RE GOING SO TO START WITH JAMES STAKELAND. AFTER HIM WE CAN DO BETH

CROCKETT. >> JAMES STEAKLAND.

PACIFIC USE PERMIT. AFTER REVIEWING THE STAFF REPORT. MY CONCERN IS THAT THE COMMISSION IS BEING ASKED TO APPROVE ZONING AND SUP BEFORE CRITICAL INFORMATION IS NEEDED THAT IT'S AVAILABLE.

GRANDFATHER IT STATES THE SITE PLAN IS ILLUSTRATED PURPOSES ONLY. THE FINAL OUTDOOR EXERCISE AREA IS NOT POTENTIAL NOISE GENERATED ACTIVITY.

HOW CAN THE COMMISSION MAKE A FULLY CAPACITY MIND FINDING BEFORE THE NOISE STUDY IS COMPLETE.

THE REPORT KATES THE POTENTIAL LIGHT, NEIGHBORHOOD PRODUCTION STANDARDS OR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BUT THE AUCTIONS NEEDED OPROSPERITY TO THE ECONOMIC. IN EFFECT, THE COMMISSION IS BEING ASKED. I NOTICED THAT THE REPORT ANALYZE ZONING ASSETS, LIGHTING AND OPERATION BUSINESS DOES NOT ANALYSIS -- I'M NOT CLAIMING THE VALUE WILL DECREASE.

I'M SAYING THAT THE ISSUE NOS IN THE BEEN STUDIED.

NOISE, TH. HOMEOWNERS COULD PLUCE THE REPORT FLOODPLAINS. -- THESE MAYBE FINANCIAL FOR THE CITY BUT OWNERSHIP AND CONVENIENCE DO NOT ESTABLISH CAPABILITY TO NEARBY HOMES. ROWLETT OPERATE ANIMAL SHELTER ON INDUSTRY STREET. THE PACKET DOES NOT SHOW A COMPARISON WHERE ADJACENT LOCATION IS PREFERRABLE.

THIS SITES WITHOUT THE FINAL LAYOUT AND NOISE STUDY, COMMISSION CANNOT FURTHER -- FOR -- PLEASE DEFER ACTION UNTIL NOISE STUDY SPECIFIC SUP AND ANALYSIS NEIGHBORHOOD PROPERTY%

VALUE IMPACTS ARE VIABLE. >> NEXT SPEAKER.

>> BETH CROCKETT. ROWLETT.

MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMPETITION I COME TONIGHT THAT THE PURPOSE OF THE HEARING IS TO RECOMMEND WHETHER OR NOT TO CHANGE ZONING THE 8502 SCHRADE ROAD WITH COMMERCIAL STONING WITH SUP TO ALLOW ANIMAL SHELTER TO BE BUILT ON THE PROPERTY. I REALIZE IT'S NOT JURY YOUR JOB -- FIRST, IT IS LOCATED NEXT DOOR TO THE FIRE STATION.

THE STORY STATION SIRENS MAKE THE DOGS BARK AND HOWL.

THIS ONE NOT ESSENTIALLY LOCATED.

NUMBER THREE, THERE'S TO WAY TO WALK THE DOGS ON SCHRADE.

[00:55:08]

GOAL OF SHELTER IS TO -- WE'RE CURRENTLY A NO KILL SHELTER.

VOLUNTEERS ARE IMPORTANT TO THE SHELTER.

THIS LAST YEAR, 70 VOLUNTEERS FOR THERE A CONCERN WITH VOLUNTEERS NOT WANTING TO GO OUT TO THE SCHRADE LOCATION.

SHELTER BOARD REQUESTED COUNSEL TO -- COUNCIL TO LOOK AT ALTERNATE SITE BE. -- IT MAKES NO SENSE TO CHOOSE THE LOCATION BECAUSE THE CITY OWNS THE PROPERTY.

WE SHOULD LOOK AT WHAT'S IS THE BEST LOCATION TO BUILD AND THESE N-- IF I ASK THAT YOU DENY THIS CASE, DENY AND IT -- TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THAT THIS IS JUST NOT THE RIGHT LOOK AT IT.

>> THANK YOU. >> NEXT I HAVE RICK SIMMONS AND THEN DAN HOPE, AFTER THAT WE'LL HAVE L LOIS.

THANK YOU. >> I LIVE LAKE SHORE VILLAGE BEHIND THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION FOR REZONING.

A LOT OF ITEMS HAVE ALREADY BEEN ADDRESSED.

I THE ISSUE AND CONCERNS TO THE PANCREATIC CANCER SHOULD BE PRETTY APPARENT. -- THEISSUE CONCERNS AND THAT DT MAKE SENSE TO ME. WITHOUT THAT IT'S DIFFICULT FOR YOU TO CONSIDER THIS AS AN OPTION.

OBVIOUSLY FOR EME AS A RESIDENT, THE NOISE AND SMELL CONCERN ME AND MY WIFE. WE EXPECTING OUR NEWBORN SON HERE IN THE COMING YEAR. I DID NOT MOVE TO ROWLETT LAST YEAR TO DEAL WITH THIS TYPE OF ISSUE AFTER I BUILT A HOME IN THIS AREA. BROADER AND MORE SYSTEMATICALLY THERE ARE TWO CONCERNS THAT BOTH OF YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND.

ONE IS NEGATIVE IMPACT TO THE RESIDENTS THAT ARE GOING CLOSE BY THIS LOT. TWO, BROADER ISSUES THAT I SEE WITH THE CITY. THE FIRST IS FOR US IN THIS AREA IN THE RESIDENTS AND ASIDE FROM THE NOISE AND THE SMELL CONCERNS, AS ONE OF MY NEIGHBORS JUST ALLUDED TO, THERE'S A SERIOUS CONCERN WITH PROPERTY VALUES.

I DON'T SEE A REASON WHY THIS WOULD HELP PROPERTY VALUES.

THAT'S GOING TO HURT THE CITY OF ROWLETT AND IT WILL HURT APPRAISAL AND HURT THE PROPERTY TAX BASE.

WHETHER THIS SHELTER ON THIS LOT OR 15 MINUTES NORTH, IT DOESN'T ADD INCREMENTAL BENEFIT TO US AS RESIDENTS.

DO WE NEED A CLOSE FIRE STATION? ABSOLUTELY.

THE LAND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IS VERY GOOD.

THAT WOULD BE GOOD LAND TO GENERATE GOOD PROPERTIES WITH GOOD VALUES TO ADD TAX REVENUE. THE ANIMAL SHELTER DOESN'T BENEFIT PUTTING ANIMAL SHELTER TON THAT GOOD LAND.

[01:00:04]

IDEALLY, YOU CAN SEE THE CITY OF GARLAND DID IT WITH THEIRS.

THEY PUT IT A BIT FURTHER OUT. NOT AS CLOSE TO PRIME RESIDENTIAL AREA. THEY NEEDED THE LAND AND SPACE.

NOT WASTING GOOD LAND THAT HAS THE PROPERTY VALUE.

I OPPOSE THIS. I THINK THE REST OF YOU SHOULD OPTION THIS. IT'S NOT TO THE BENEFIT OF THE COMMUNITY. PLEASE LISTEN TO THE PUBLIC THAT CLEARLY SHOW THEY DON'T WANT THIS.

LOVE ANIMAL SHELTER, NEED AN ANIMAL SHELTER, PUT IT SOMEWHERE

ELSE. >> THANK YOU.

>> THIS DID NOT REMINDS ME OF OUR PREVIOUS CITY MANAGER, DAVID HALL. TRYING TO JAM A BUNCH OF STUFF ON CITY PROPERTY WHICH HAPPEN TO BE A PARK.

WHILE WE'RE DISCUSSING THIS FOR CITY OWNED LAND IS JUST ANOTHER BAD DECISION. YES, IT COULD BE PUT HERE.

BUT THERE ARE BETTER PLACES FOR IT.

THERE ARE ALTERNATE SITES THAT ARE MORE CENTRALLY LOCATED.

THEY ARE DOWN IN THE DOWNTOWN CORRIDOR.

THERE ARE PLACES OWN INDUSTRIAL BY BUILDING IN MORE COMMERCIAL AREA. YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE A SOUND WALL AND OTHER AMENITIES.

I HATE THE FACT THAT WE'RE HERE TALKING ABOUT IT BEFORE EVERYTHING IS GATHERED UP. IT'S LIKE PLANTING TREE BEFORE YOU HAVE WATER TO IT. IT MAKES NO SENSE.

LET'S THINK ABOUT WHAT WE'RE DOING BEFORE WE START GRAB THINGS OUT OF THE AIR TO PASS SOMETHING TO SHOVE A SQUARE PEG AND A ROUND -- LET'S GET THE WORK DONE FIRST.

I'M GLAD THE CITY CONSIDERING MOVING ON IT BEFORE TIEING TO A BUNCH OTHER CITY PROJECS THAT KEEP DELAYING IT.

WE NEED TO DO IT CORRECTLY. IT'S OKAY TO WAIT ON THE SOUND STUDY. WE'RE SENDING GOOD MONEY AFTER BAD WHEN THERE'S ALTERNATIVE ON ALL SIDES.

THANK YOU. >> NEXT SPEAKER.

>> LOIS. NEXT SPEAKER IS DEANNA SEIGLER.

AFTER THAT WOULD BE TAMARA ABERNATHY.

>> GOOD EVENING, I'M DINA SEIGLER.

I'M HERE AT MEMBER OF THE ROWLETT SHELTER ADVISORY BOARD.

WE RECEIVED A PRESENTATION ON THE PROPOSED PLACEMENT OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER AT SCHRADE ROAD. THERE WAS TEAM LOOKING AT ALTERNATIVE SITES. WE WERE NOT PLEASED WITH THE 8502 SCHRADE LOCATION DUE TO SOUND IMPACT.

WEEINGED THAT IF THEY DO CHOOSE TO PROCEED THAT THE SOUNDS MAY NEED TO BE DONE. WE DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THIS IS COMING BEFORE THE BOARD, BEFORE THE SITE SELECTIONS AND

ALTERNATIVES HAVE BEEN. >> DON'T THEM -- IT IS LISTEN ON THE FAR EDGE OF ROWLETT. NOT IN THE MORE CENTRAL PART OF ROWLETT. I'M WORRY VOLUNTEER ABOUT OOPS NOT PRESUME. -- INSTEAD, THE CITY LOOK AND CONTINUE TO SITE SELECTION. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. >> GREETINGS.

I'M TAMARA ABERNATHY. I'M A RESIDENT OF LAKE SHORE

[01:05:02]

VILLAGE. I LIKE TO LET YOU KNOW THAT I OPPOSE THE ANIMAL SHELTER BEING PLACED.

MANY OF THE CONCERNS THAT I HAVE HAVE BEEN SPOKEN SPOKEN ALREADY.

THAT IS FAIRLY NEWLY BUILT. WE HAVE YOUNG MAR, -- THE NOISE, SMELL AND LOCATION, I DON'T THINK IT'S A GOOD FIT THERE THAT AREA. SCHRADE ROAD IS NOT A ROAD THAT HAVE LOTS OF FOR -- I WANT TO PLACE UPON YOU TO OPPOSE THIS.

THANK YOU >> THANK YOU.

>> LAST TWO WE HAVE DAVE HALL AND AFTER HIM WILL BE MICHAEL

URA. >> DAVE HALL.

ROWLETT. I WANT TO REMIND YOU ABOUT THE PIECE LAND ON WEST SIDE OF THE CURRENT SCHRADE FIRE STATION AFTER THE 2015 TORNADO I WAS TRYING TO REBUILD MY HOUSE AT 6802 MILLER. THE CITY MANAGER WOULD NOT ISSUE A BUILDING PERMIT. HOW MANY OF HOW TO GIVE CITY A -- ABOUT A YEAR LATER, I WAS UNABLE TO GET THE WATER CONNECTION. THE CITY SCHEDULED A MEETING ME, MY CONTRACTOR, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR AND ADDITIONAL PUBLIC WORKS STAFF. THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR LOOKED AT THE VENUE, DEVELOPER AND STATED BEGIN, YOU DROPPED THOSE LOADS OF DIRT ON THE WRONG LOT. THEY SUPPOSED TO BE ON NEXT DOOR LOT. THE DEVELOPER SAID, OH NO, I DROPPED THEM ON THE ADDRESS YOU ACQUIRED.

I HAVE THE PICTURES. IN ORDER FOR THE DEVELOPED PROJECT TO MOVE FAN MORE QUID PRO QUO CONSTRUCTION WITH HISTORICAL ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT. I WAS WITH THE FIRE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND OVERHEARD PEOPLE TALKING ABOUT HOW THE HAD -- MY CHIME IN THAT WAS AWARE OF.

NEXT, THE MAYOR -- NEXT, THE CITY BOUGHT THE NEIGHBOR'S LAND FOR A PREMIUM. SINCE HE HAD THE CITY OVER A BARREL. NEXT, THE CITY USED THE PUBLIC SAFETY BOND FUNDS TO BUY THIS LAND.

NEXT, FROM TODAY'S ORIGINAL PACKET I FOUND GOOGLE MAPS GAVE ME TWO CONFLICTS ADDRESSESSER IF THE PROPOSED ANIMAL SHELTER MOR--IN THE SOUTH WE HAVE A IS W DUMB IS IT TO BUILD A ANIMAL SHELTER WITH LEGACY AND FOUNDATION OF LET'S LET DEAD DOGS DIE. I EXTHANK YOU.

>> GOOD EVENING. THANK YOU FOR EVERYTHING THAT YOU DO. FOR IF -- I BEEN IN ROWLETT FORN YEARS. VERY EXCITE TO BE BACK IN THE CITY. I'M THE LAKE SHORE VILLAGE HOA.

I'M SPEAKING OUTDECISION ON ITEM, 4-POINT YOUNGER.

[01:10:04]

OUR CONCERN IS WITH -- OUR POSITION RESTS ON THE PROVIDES PACKET OF NFC. ON SEPTEMBER 15TH -- THE REPORT NOTES RESPONDED TO 1531 CALLS JUST THIS YEAR.

THAT SIRENS ARE ACTIVATED ON TO SCHRADE ROAD SPECIFICALLY.

THIS WAYS RAE R. NONE SHIELDS ANIMALSSES FROM RYE RAY RUY S -- IT'S CLOSEST TO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. THAT BRINGS ME TO OUR MAIN REQUEST. ON AUGUST 20TH ANIMAL SHELTER SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD ASK THAT A NOISE STUDY BE CONDUCTED.

STAFF CONFIRMED HAS NOT COMPLETE.WILL COME TO CITY COUNCIL ON OCTOBER 20TH. WE WOULD ASK COMMISSION NOT TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS. USE FOUR WEEKS BEFORE THE STUDY OF ESSENTIAL PRACT INTERACT IS. OUR CHILDREN'S PARK AND OUR.

EFFECT ON PROPERTY VALUES SINCE PERFECT NICE WEB -- RECOMMEND DENIAL 4B, PERMANENTLY REZONE 8.43 ACRES OF --

>> THANK YOU, SIR. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO LIKE TO SPEAK? SEEING NO ONE.

I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 8:27 P.M.

COMMISSIONER POLLARD. >> I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION. SO WE CAN DISCUSS THIS FURTHER.

I WOULD LIKE TO RECOMMENDATION -- RECOMM RECOMMEND TO THE CITYL REZONING OF THIS PROPERTY. DISTRICT C1, -- I WOULD LIKE TO TABLE THE SUP TO THE DATE CERTAIN.

>> I HAVE A MOTION ON THE TABLE FROM COMMISSIONER POLLARD.

DO I HAVE A CONCLUDE. DO YOU HAVE A SECOND? COMMISSIONER WHITE. PRE FIRST, I HAVE A MOTION ON THE TABLE.

I NEED A SECOND. THEN WE CAN DISCUSS.

COMMISSIONER HERNANDEZ SECONDS. NOW WE CAN DISCUSS.

>> THE QUESTION, CAN WE SEPARATE THE ZONING FOR THE FIRE HOUSE FROM THE SECOND PROPERTY? IS THAT P --

>> MOVE NOW. >> THE NOTICE THAT WAS PUBLISH

[01:15:13]

STATES F BOTH PROPERTIES INDEPENDENTLY.

IN THAT INSTANCE, I'M GOING TO SEEK FRESH -- THAT IS AN OPTION

AVAILABLE TO THE COMMISSION. >> TO SPLIT THE ZONING IN HALF.

IN TWO ONE FOR THE FIRE STATION PROPERTY AND ONE FOR THE UNDOCUMENTED PROPERTY? THAT CORRECT.

>> PRE >> THE WAY NOTIFICATION AND THE CAPTION IS TIGHTED REQUEST CHANGE AND ZONE FOR APPROVAL OF

SUP FOR AN ANIMAL SHELTER. >> COMMISSIONER BLAYDES.

I LIKE TO MAKE A FRIENDLY AMENDMENT THAT WE DO JUST WHAT MR. WHITE REQUESTED. WE AMEND POLLARD MOTION.

ONE FOR FIRE HOUSE PROPERTY AND ONE FOR THE VACANT PROPERTY.

>> REQUEST ARE WE -- -- IS THE FRIENDLY AMENDMENT TO REZONE GREATESTHESUP PLAN OR THE FIRE N PROPERTY? ONE FOR FIRE HOUSE OTHERS CHANGE -- YES.

I APOLOGIZE FOR RAISING THE SAME QUESTION.

THERE'S A REQUEST TO CHANGE ZONING BY THE NOTIFICATION ON BOTH PROPERTIES. UDERSTANDING THAT YOU WANT TO SPLIT THE ACTION, YOU'RE SUGGESTING OR RECOMMENDING TO VOTE FOR THE CHANGE IN ZONING ON ONE, CHANGE IN ZONE ON THE SECOND AND THE SUP ON THE SECOND.

YOU HAVE TO ACT ON IT BECAUSE IT'S-YOU TABLE IT.

I'M SAY YOUR ACTIONS WILL INCLUDE THOSE FIVE.

PERFECT, THANK YOU. I WANTED TO BE -- THE CITY

ATTORNEY SAID THAT'S OKAY. >> COMMISSIONER POLLARD.

DO YOU SECOND? >> YOU GUESS I HAVE QUESTION.

[01:20:09]

COMMISSIONER WHITE.

ED.

>> COMMISSIONERS. WOULD YOU PLEASE ARTICULATE THE FRIENDLY AMENDMENT OR RE-- OUGHT T-- MOTION THAT -- IT WASN'T IT. IT WAS SO MOVE --

>> WILL YOU ASH TICK LATE THE MOTION?

CONF-- COMMISSIONER BLAYDES. >> IT'S BROKEN DOWN DRUP IN

MURES. THEY ARE SEPARATE FOR -- >> I WOULD BE AGREEABLE TO AMENDED MOTION TO TAKE A SEPARATE VOTE ON ONE THE FIRE STATION PROPERTY, TWO THE VACANT PROPERTY, THE TWO DIFFERENT ADDRESSES AND THEN TO TABLE THE SUP TO DATE CERTAIN.

PREPARE COMMISSIONER PER -- >> ANY COMMENTS?

>> JUST AS TO BE CLEAR, I'M NOT SURE WHY SEPARATING THEM.

I DON'T KNOW WHY WE HAVE TO COMPLICATE THAT.

I WOULD QUESTION WHY WOULD KNOW -- AS A MATTER OF THE SUP, I'M VERY MUCH IN LINE WHERE I THINK EVERYBODY FEEL.

THIS IS THE WRONG PLACE FOR TH ANIMAL SHELTER.

SINCE WE'RE GOING TO TABLE IT, AND BECAUSE WE'VE ALREADY PREVIOUSLY FOR -- I'M HOPING THAT DOESN'T GO ANYWHERE.

>> OKAY, SO. I, TOO, TO TAKE THE VOTE ON TWO SEPARATE. I WILL SAY THIS, I THINK THAT THE -- I MOVE TO A NEW NEIGHBORHOOD OR I BUY AN OLDER HOME THAT'S ALREADY ESTABLISHED THAT THE CITY SHOULD HAVE WHEN THEY BOUGHT THE PROPERTY IN THE BEGINNING, SHOULD HAVE RESTRICKEN PRE DE -- WHAT THIS S IS TAKE IS OUT OF RESIDENTIAL SF10 AND MAKE IT COMMERCIAL ONE. THAT WAY ANYBODY THAT BUYS INTO AN OLDER NEIGHBORHOOD OR THE NEW NEIGHBORHOOD, UNDER CONSTRUCTION, THEIR EXPECTATIONS WOULD BE THAT KNOWING THAT THAT VACANT PROPERTY OVER THERE WOULD NOT BE HOME.

I THINK THAT'S -- I THINK THAT EVERYBODY WANTS TO SEE MORE

[01:25:09]

APARTMENT. YOU HAVE THE LUX AT THE CORNER.

YOU GOT ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE FIRE STATION.

NOT SURE WHAT THAT'S GOING TO BE.

I THINK THE WAY IT WAS LAID OUT, IT WAS ORIGINALLY GOING TO BE APARTMENTS. NOT SURE FROM -- WHEN YOU SEVERE STICK OUT THE GROUND, THAT'S OR -- CITY WHAT A TRIACT SELL THAT OFF. IF THEY WANTED TO SELL.OFF TOISTIC IN FI -- THEY CAN GO BAA SINGLE FAMILY DESIGNATION.

IF IT'S SOLD OFF AT LEAST THE EXPECTATION IS PROBABLY NOT GOING TO BE HOMES. IF A CITY DEVELOPS IT IT WON'T BE A HOME. IT WILL BE A CITY BUILDING WITH SSOME HOME. THAT'S NUMBER ONE.

NUMBER TWO IS THAT THE ISSUE IT ALREADY BEEN COMMISSIONED.

I TOO IN CONCURRENCE WITH MR. HERNANDEZ.

FR-I TOLD ONE OF THE STAFF MEMB, THE AMBIENT NOISE THAT'S ALREADY THERE DOWN BOT -- DOESN'T BOTHER ME.

WHEN AMBULANCE OR FIRE TRUCK PULLS OUT AND THOSE SIRENS GO OFF THAT HIGH PITCH SOUND THE DOGS, THEY DON'T CAIR? -- MANY DOGS GO OFF HOWLING IS NOT CONDUCIVE TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AROUND IT.

THAT'S MY THOUGHTS. >> I LIKE TO SHARE MY THOUGHTS.

PROJECT OF THIS MAGNITUDE AND COMMUNITY IMPACT REQUIRES VIGOROUS DUE DILIGENCE. WE WANT TO ENSURE WE INVEST TAXPAYER DOLLARS WAYSLY. A THOROUGH EVALUATION MUST INCLUDE HU -- WHICH INCLUDES THE PERK PERSON -- AS IT STANDS THIS COMMISSION IS BEING ASKED TO MAKE A PERMANENT LAND USE DECISION COMPLETELY IN THE DARK. I FULLY SUPPORT OUR CITY'S NEEDS TO ADDRESS THE WELFARE OF OUR LOCAL ANIMAL POPULATION, I SUGGEST THAT THIS BE AN ANALYSIS.

COMPLETED AND MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC.

>> ONE OTHER POINT I WANT TO MAKE.

COMMISSIONER POLLARD, I WANT TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND.

MULTIFAMILY IS NOT C1. IF THESE WERE ZONE C1 APARTMENTS

SHOULD NOT APPEAR THERE? >> CORRECT.

>> I WOULD LIKE TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION MR. HERNANDEZ WHY I ADDED TWO VOTES. I WAS TRYING TO ACCOMMODATE

BROTHER WHITE CONCERN. >> THE REASON WHY THE FIRE HOUSE

[01:30:03]

WAS AREA THAT NEED TO BE FIXED. THE SECOND STORY ABOUT THIS UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY, THAT IS ZONE FOR SF10.

LEAVE IT THERE ARE IF THE NEXT DEVELOPER.

NOT CHANGING ANYTHING THERE. MY BELIEF IS THIS IS THE WRONG LOCATION FOR ANIMAL SHELTER. WE NEED TO FIX SOMETHING FROM

THE PAST WE NEED TO FIX. >> MY ONLY COMMENT BACK TO YOU MR. WHITE AND ALL DUE RESPECT, WHOEVER BUYS IN THAT AREA, BUILD NEW ONE, OR AN EXISTING HOME.

THE BUYER HAS AN EXPECTATION OF WHAT IS AROUND.

IF YOU LEAVE THAT VACANT PROPERTY OWNED BY THE CITY, ST10, THE CITY COULD SELL IT AND HAVE A CHANGE REQUESTED ON IT AND WHOEVER BUYS THEIR EXPECTATION IS SINGLE FAMILY.

I FOUND THE CITY WOULD SELL THAT >> YOU ASKING TO ANSWER A QUESTION ON THE FUTURE? WE DON'T KNOW WHAT WILL HAPPEN ON ANY PIECE OF PAR SEE IN THE CITY.

LIKE LIKE THAT CAN HAPPEN IN THE FUTURE.

YOU CAN'T GOVERN THIS OALL YOU CAN DO LIVE LEAVE -- YOU CAN'T

CONTROL THAT HERE. >> IF I BOUGHT A LOT THAT BACKS UP TO THIS AND IT'S SF1. WHAT'S MY EXPECTATIONS? THAT'S GOING TO BE BUILT AS SF10 THAT'S A SINGLE FAMILY

RESIDENCE. >> IS THAT TRUE ANYWHERE ELSE IN

THE CITY? >> THE FACT THAT THE CITY OWNS IT AND PROBABLY NOT SELL IT. THE CITY CAN COME IN THERE AND BUILD ANOTHER CITY-OWN BUILD. I'M SAYING THE EXPECTATION OF WHOEVER BUYS AND BUILDS, ESPECIALLY IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD BACKS UP TO IT THAT AT LEAST THEY HAVE TOP.

>> NO VOTE WE TAKE TODAY CAN CONTROL WHAT WILL HAPPEN FIVE OR TEN YEARS. RIGHT NOW WE LEAVE IT THE SAME.

THIS IS THE SAME TODAY. 20 YEARS FROM NOW THAT COULD CHANGE. WE DON'T KNOW THAT.

I LIVE IN LAKEWOOD POINT. THE PROPERTY BEHIND US IS UNDEVELOPED. THAT COULD COME IN SOMETHING DIFFERENT. WE DON'T KNOW WE CAN CONTROL THAT NOW. WE KNOW WHEN THAT COMES UP, WE'LL BE MEETING LIKE SUCH AND HAVE VOTES.

>> I WANTED TO ADD, YOU KNOW, AFTER THIS DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS ITEM, STILL GOES BACK TO IFIVE FOR IT OR RANSOM ANSWER.

WE NEED TO BE DISCUSSED BECAUSE AT THAT TIME, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TONIGHT IS THE RECOMMENDATION FOR THIS ITEM, WHETHER YOU VOTE FOR IT IN ITS ENTIRETY OR DISSECT IT.

I THINK IT'S CLEAR BUT MAINLY WHAT WE WERE SEEKING CLARIFICATION ON IS WHAT WAS OUR EXPECTATION AS A BODY OF P&Z.

TONIGHT, WHETHER WE DO IT OR NOT.

TO ME THE ALTERNATE DECISION IS WE FOR IT OR AGAINST IT.

FOR ME, I DON'T HAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION.

IT'S JUST THAT CLEAR TO ME TONIGHT.

IT SEEM LIKE WE'RE DISCUSSING OTHER THINGS THAT CAN BE DISCUSSED DURING THE FUTURE MEETING.

I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S JUST ME. IT'S CLEAR TO ME WHAT WE NEED TO DO. IT'S MAINLY THAT IF WE ARE FOR THIS OR WE AGAINST IT. DO WE FEEL WE NEED ADDITIONAL

[01:35:03]

INFORMATION. I FEEL I DO.

THAT'S JUST MY TAKE ON THIS TONIGHT.

THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER.

I AGREE WITH YOU, WE DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION TO MAKE A DECISION. NOW WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE TABLE. REPEAT THE MOTION.

>> I THINK WE'RE VOTING ON CHANGE THE ZONING FOR THE FIRE

HOUSE. >> WHAT IS THE MOTION?

>> INDIVIDUAL. >> AWAY IS THE FIRST -- WHAT IS

THE FIRST MOTION? >> WHETHER YOU SHOULD CHANGE THE

ZONING FOR THE FIRE HOUSE. >> WHAT NUMBER IS THAT?

>> FIRE HOUSE IS -- WHAT'S THE ADDRESS?

>> 8502 OR 8602? >> CAN YOU CLARIFY HIS MAKING

THE MOTION FOR US? >> OKAY.

WE ARE TAKING A VOTE ON THE PROPERTY AT 8602 SCHRADE ROAD.

>> THAT'S TO CHANGE TO C1? >> YES.

THAT PASSES 5-2. THE SECOND MOTION IS ON THE

PROPERTY AT 8502 SCHRADE ROAD. >> CORRECT.

THAT'S ALSO FOR C1. THAT MOTION FAILS 4-2.

>> POINT OF ORDER ON THIS. IF WE'RE VOTING TO TABLE OF SUP WE JUST REJECTED, DOES THE TABLE BECOME A MOOT POINT?

>> IF THE VOTE HAS BEEN TO DENY THE CHANGE IN ZONING ON THAT SUBJECT PROPERTY, THEN THE SUP IS A MOOT POINT.

THAT MOTION WOULD FAIL AS WELL. >> THE MOTION WAS TO TABLE THE SUP. IF WE'RE VOTING TO DENY THE CHANGE IN ZONING TO C1 FOR THE VACANT PROPERTY, THERE'S NOTHING REALLY TO TABLE AT THIS POINT?

>> THEY CAN CHOOSE TO VOTE ON THE THIRD PIECE.

[01:40:09]

THE THIRD MOTION -- THE THIRD ITEM FOR THIS MOTION WILL BE THE

VOTE ON THE SUP. >> JUST TO BE CLEAR, WE'RE ASKING TO TABLE THE ACTION ON THE SUP?

>> YES. >> IS THERE A NEED TO DO A VOTE ON THAT? DO WE SAY TABLE? IT IS A MOOT POINT. AT THE SAME TIME, WE ARE RECOMMENDING BODY. IF WE SAY TO TABLE IT, DOES THAT BASICALLY FORCE COUNCIL TO SAY ONLY DEALING WITH THE ZONING AND THEN ONCE THE COMPLETE STUDIES ARE DONE FOR THE SUP, THEN IT

CAN COME BACK TO US. >> RIGHT.

THE ONLY ACTION DEPENDING ON WHEN THESE MOVE FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL, THE ONLY ACTION WILL BE ON THE TWO ZONING ACTION ITEMS

AND NOT THE SUP ZONING ACTION. >> IS THERE A NEED TO TOO VOTE TO -- ACTUALLY VOTE TO SAY WE'RE TABLING THIS?

>> YES. >> IS A NEED TO VOTE ON IT.

BECAUSE YOU GOT THREE ITEMS OPEN-ENDED.

YOU HAVE TO CLOSE THE ITEM. >> SO.

MS. CHAIRMAN, SINCE I MADE THE MOTION TO TABLE THIS TO A DATE CERTAIN. DO WE NEED TO GIVE A DATE?

I ISUGGEST NOVEMBER 10TH. >> I HAVE A MOTION TO TABLE THE SUP DECISION TO NOVEMBER 10TH. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HERNANDEZ.

GO TO VOTE. THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

[Members Of the Planning and Zoning Commission may request topics to be placed on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Any deliberation or decision shall be limited to a proposal to place the topic on the agenda for a subsequent meeting.]

>> MS. CHAIRMAN, BEFORE WE CLOSE SINCE THAT WAS THE LAST, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT UNDER THE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REQUEST TOPICS TO BE PLACED ON THE AGENDA FOR

SUBSEQUENT MEETINGS. >> OKAY.

>> I LIKE TO KNOW WHAT THE STATUS IS ON THE CONDOS OR APARTMENTS UP HERE AT MAIN AND KIRBY.

SENSE THAT'S A FOREIGN-BASED CODE SUP FOR URBAN VILLAGE.

THERE WAS TALK ABOUT THAT BEING UP FOR SALE AND SO FORTH.

THE SIGN WAS NOT THERE TODAY. I LIKE TO KNOW WHAT THE STATUS WOULD BE IF THAT GOES AWAY SINCE AN SUP FOLLOWS THE ZONING AND IF WHATEVER WE VOTED ON IS NOW POTENTIALLY -- DOESN'T EXIST IF THEY SELL THE PROPERTY. I DON'T THINK A BUYER IS BEHOLDEN TO THE PLANS THAT WE APPROVED.

I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE AN UPDATE ON IT.

I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO HAVE AN UPDATE ON THE REGULATION AND I BELIEVE THAT THIS WAS ALREADY MENTIONED THAT THERE IS NO EXPIRATION AFTER FIVE YEARS. IT'S WITH THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY, THAT SELL THE PROPERTY WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST.

SHOULD WE LOOK AT REDOING REGULATIONS THAT GIVE AN EXPIRATION DATE ON AN SUP. THIRDLY, I WOULD LIKE TO -- AN

[01:45:05]

ITEM WAS PULLED THIS EVENING. I WOULD LIKE FOR A REVIEW OF THE ZONING THAT'S ONLY EXISTING PROPERTY OF WHAT WOULD HAVE BEEN ITEM 3B. I THINK THAT MY RECOLLECTION IS THAT IS COMMERCIAL ALL THE WAY THROUGH THERE AND WHAT I SAW THAT WAS REQUESTED HAD TO DO WITH MULTIFAMILY.

I LIKE TO HAVE AN UPDATE ON THAT BY STAFF.