Nov 05, 2020 City Council Meetings

[1. CALL TO ORDER ]

[00:00:02]

5TH, 2020, 7:30 P.M. AS AUTHORIZED BY SECTION 551 TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE THIS MEETING MAY BE CONVENED IN FOR PURPOSES CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL ADVICE FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY ON ANY AGENDA ITEM HERE IN.

THE CITY OF ROWLETT CALL THE EXECUTIVE SESSION ANY TIME PRIOR TO ADJOURNMENT. DUE TO PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY TO CONFORM WITH SOCIAL DISTANCING THE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS WILL BE HELD VIA TELECONFERENCING.

THE PUBLIC CAN BE LIVE ON THE VIA WEBSITE.

I FORGOT TO ASK IF WE WERE OKAY TO START.

STACEY. >> WE HAD YOU COVERED.

>> THANK YOU. I'M SO SORRY.

WE ARE GOING TO START OUR EVENING WITH AN INVOCATION WE ARE THRILLED AND HONORED TO HAVE PASTOR COLE HITCHCOCK FOR BEING WITH US. IF YOU WOULD PLEASE LEAD US

IN OUR INVOCATION. >> OKAY.

>> HEAVENLY FATHER WE COME BEFORE YOU TODAY WE'RE GRATEFUL THAT WE CAN COME TO YOU AND CALL UPON YOUR NAME AND THAT YOUR WORD TELLS US THAT YOU'RE FAITHFUL.

FATHER WE WANT TO COME TO YOU NOT ONLY AS INDIVIDUALS BUT FATHER AS A CITY AS CITIZENS OF OUR CITY AND OUR STATE AND OUR COUNTRY. AND PRAY THAT YOU WOULD BRING WHAT YOUR WORD PROMISES THAT YOU WOULD BRING PEACE. PEACE TO OUR LAND.

WE NEED IT. WE NEED IT FOR WHAT HAS TAKEN PLACE THROUGHOUT OUR COUNTRY.

WE NEED IT BECAUSE THIS CHAOS THAT WE'RE FACING IN OUR LIVES AND OUR LIFESTYLE LORD IS JUST NOT WHAT WE NEED. FATHER I PRAY AS THE CITY COUNCIL JOINS AND WORKS TONIGHT FOR THE WELFARE OF OUR CITY THAT YOU WILL BLESS THE MAYOR, THAT YOU WOULD BLESS THE CITY MANAGER AND EVERYONE WHO SERVES ON COUNCIL. FATHER, I PLAY THEIR WORK WOULD BE PLEASING TO YOU. I PRAY THAT THEY WOULD ALWAYS BE MINDFUL OF THE TASKS THAT THEY'VE TAKEN ON TO SERVE OTHERS TO SERVE FOR THE WELL-BEING OF OUR CITY I JUST PRAY BLESSINGS UPON EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEM TONIGHT. LORD I PRAY THEY WOULD BE EFFECTIVE EFFICIENT WITH THEIR TIME THAT THEY WOULD HONOR AND THAT FATHER YOU WOULD PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR US TO ENLARGE, NOT JUST THE REACH OF OUR CITY BUT ENLARGE THE INFLUENCE OF SHINING LIGHT AND DOING GOOD TO A WORLD THAT DESPERATELY NEEDS IT.

FATHER WE PRAY ALL THIS IN THE MIGHTY NAME OF JESUS.

AMEN. >> AMEN.

>> THANK YOU SO MUCH PASTOR. >> Y'ALL HAVE A GREAT DAY.

>> GOOD TO SEE YOU. >> BYE-BYE.

>> THANK YOU. >> ALL RIGHT.

[5A. Update from the City Council and Management: Financial Position, Major Projects, Operational Issues, Upcoming Dates of Interest and Items of Community Interest. ]

THE RESPONSE RATE WAS 67%. THE RESPONSE RATE IN THE STATE OF TEXAS WAS 62.8%. IN THE CITY OF WAS 81.4%.

WE JUST WANTED TO TAKE A MOMENT TO APPRECIATE THE TIME AND EFFORT OF THE COMPLETE COUNT COMMITTEE IN HELPING TO ENSURE THAT EVERY NEIGHBOR IN ROWLETT THANK YOU VERY MUCH TO THAT COMMITTEE.

BROWNIE HAS HIS HAND UP. >> YES.

LAST SATURDAY WE HAD A PHARMACEUTICAL TAKEBACK AND WE TOOK IN 556 POUNDS OF DRUGS OFF THE STREET.

PEOPLE WERE CLEANING OUR THEIR CUPBOARDS AND NEEDLES.

WE HAD PROBABLY FIVE TIMES AS MANY AS WE'VE EVER HAD BEFORE. I TOOK NONE NUMBERS TO THE FIRE STATIONS THEY WERE SHOCKED.

THOSE GUYS WERE AMAZED. BIG THANK YOU FOR CLEANING OUT THEIR MEDICINE CABINETS AND GETTING RID OF THAT

[00:05:01]

THANKS. >> THANK YOU SO MUCH, BROWNIE. ANY OTHER ANNOUNCEMENTS

COUNCIL? >> OKAY.

>> OUR NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS OUR CITIZEN INPUT SECTION. THIS IS A TIME IN THE MEETING WHEN CITIZENS CAN COMMENT ON ANY ITEM FOR UP TO THREE MINUTES WE DID NOT HAVE ANY CITIZEN INPUT

[7. CONSENT AGENDA ]

IF YOU WOULD PLEASE COUNCIL DID NOT ASK FOR ANY ITEMS TO BE REMOVED FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION.

SO IF YOU BOULD POLICE STAYSY READ THOSE ITEMS INTO THE REPORT. IDEA 7 A APPROVING MINUTES.

A7 B CONSIDER RESOLUTION PROVING A TASK AUTHORIZATION FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES. 7 C CONSIDER A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PAYMENT AND COMPLETION OF FEDERAL CLOSEOUT PROCEDURES FOR TORNADO DEBRIS MANAGEMENT RESPONSE REIMBURSEMENT PROJECT.

7 D, CONSIDER REAPPOINTMENT OF MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE.

7 E CONSIDER AWARDING CAFOR RENTAL OF UNIFORMS. 7 F CONSIDER A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A GRANT

APPLICATION. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

I WOULD HAVE A MOTION FROM COUNCIL.

>> I MAKE A MOTION. >> DO I HAVE A SECOND?

FROM -- A SECOND? >> ALL THOSE IN FAVOR PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND AND THOSE ITEMS PASS -- THIS DOES

[8A. Conduct a public hearing and take action on approving an ordinance regarding amendments to the Form-Based Code and the North Shore Framework Plans to: 1) require Special Use Permits for Mixed Residential Building Types and multi-family projects, and 2) revise the Building Types provision limiting Mixed Residential buildings to 25% of a larger mixed use development in the North Shore Framework Plans. ]

I.T. 8 A TAKE ACTION ON APPROVING AN ORDINANCE REGARDING TO ONE REQUIRE SPECIAL USE PERMITS FOR MIXED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES AND MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS AND TWO, REVISE THE BUILDING PROTO 25 --.

AND I THINK WE WILL PROBABLY HAVE NOLE HERE TONIGHT.

>> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL. >> GOOD TO HAVE YOU HERE THANK YOU. THIS IS A CONTINUATION OR AN ADD-ON FROM THE LAST COUNCIL MEETING.

HOWEVER WE WANT TO COVER THIS I'M SURE WE'LL BE GOOD

WITH IT. >> COUNCIL IF IT'S YOUR PUSH FOR -- WISH I CAN GO OVER THE PRESENTATION FROM OCTOBER 20TH IS WHEN WE HEARD THIS ITEM.

WE HAD TO POSTPONE IT BECAUSE THE LANGUAGE IN THE -- CAPTION WAS NOT ARTICULATED CORRECTLY FOR THE AMENDMENT IT SO DIDN'T HAVE AN ACTION ASSOCIATED WITH IT. THE COUNCIL DID OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. THEY HEARD TESTIMONY AND THEY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THAT POINT.

SO IN AN EFFORT JUST TO BRING EVERYBODY TO SPEED I WILL GO THROUGH THE PRESENTATION.

IF YOU RECALL IN EARLY SEPTEMBER THE CITY COUNCIL INDICATED A DESIRE TO HAVE ADDITIONAL OVERSIGHT IN THE APPROVAL MULTIFAMILY USE. HELP ME OUT, THANK YOU.

>> AS IT STANDS CURRENTLY THE MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT IN THREE ZONING DISTRICTS THE OPEN NEIGHBORHOOD ZONING DISTRICT. THERE ARE SPECIFIC BUILDING TYPES AND ALL MIXED RESIDENTIAL, MIXED USE PERMIT CURRENTLY PERMIT MULTIFAMILY APARTMENT SHOULD IT BE APPROVED TONIGHT AN S.U.P. WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR MULTIDEVELOPMENTS. IN ADDITION TO THE CODE WE ALSO HAVE STRATEGIC AREAS ONE BEING THE NORTH SHORE FRAMEWORK PLAN. WE ADOPTED THE NORTH SHORE ASSOCIATED WITH THE NORTH SHORE AREA.

WE ADOPTED FRAMEWORK PLAN AND COMMERCE AND TRADE

[00:10:01]

I DO WANT TO ADD THAT THIS REQUIREMENT THE 25% CURRENTLY IN THE URBAN VILLAGE DISTRICT IT DOES NOT. FACING NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

THE TABLE IN FRONT OF YOU IS INTENDED TO GIVE GUIDANCE AND PROVIDE A MATRIX RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND WHAT OCCURS IN TERMS OF THE USES ASSOCIATED WITH THESE BUILDING TYPES. SO IN THE MIXED RESIDENTIAL WHICH IS PRIMARILY YOUR MULTIFAMILY DEFINITION THE FORM-BASED CODE USES THE WORDS MIXED RESIDENTIAL AS OPPOSED TO MULTIFAMILY INCH THE MIXED RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT YOU HAVE APARTMENTS. WITH THAT, AGAIN, THE IT HAS ALWAYS INTENDED WAS ALWAYS INTENDED TO HAVE SOME FORM OF INTEGRATED LAND USES IN USING THE TERM INTEGRATED IN LAND USES. THE WORK BUILDING TYPE IS ALSO A COMPONENT WITH MIXED USE RETAIL OR OFFICE ON THE GROUND FLOOR WITH RESIDENTIAL RETAIL OR OFFICE ON UPPER STORIES. SO IN THIS INSTANCE WHAT THIS MATRIX IS SHOWING THAT IN ALL ELEMENTS WHERE YOU HAVE THE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT AND AN S.U.P. WILL BE REQUIRED. POLICY STATES, NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. THANK YOU.

THIS NEXT SLIDE IDENTIFIEDS FOR US THE ELEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH OUR REQUEST, A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN ITSELF IS PRIMARILY A FORMAL ZONING ACTION WHICH ENCOURAGES PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT ASKS FOR COMMENTARY FROM THE PUBLIC REGARDING THE USE AND ALSO ALLOWS A GOOD ANALYSES OF THE SITE DEVELOPMENT THE FEATURED.

AGAIN, AN S.U.P. IS NOT A TOOL TO ISSUE VARIANCES OR RELIEVE PARTICULAR HARD SHIPS TO A SITE.

IT'S PRIMARILY AN ELEMENT THAT PROVIDES ADDITIONAL OVERSIGHT IN USING A USE IN ITS RELATIONSHIP TO THE BILL.

IN ORDER TO REQUIRE AN S.U.P. FOR MULTIFAMILY USES IN THE NORTH SHORE NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, STACEY, I KNOW THIS IS A VERY HEAVY SLIDE. BUT IT ARTICULATES WHAT THOSE PROPOSED CHANGES ARE. I WILL PARAPHRASE.

THE FIRST AMENDMENT OBVIOUSLY WOULD BE AS IT RELATES TO SO AN A. SURGERY U.M. WOULD BE A PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS AND IT WOULD ALLOW PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AS WELL AS ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS INTENDED TO ENSURE THAT THE PROPOSED USE IS INDEED COMPLIMENTARY OR SURROUNDING ITS LAND USE PARCELS. ADDITIONALLY, WE ALSO ADDED THAT REVIEW APPROVAL PUBLIC HEARING AND NOTICE PROCEDURES FOR THIS SPECIAL USE PERMIT WILL BE AS SET FORTH IN THE ROWLETT DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH AGAIN IS MERELY IDENTIFYING WHAT THOSE PUBLIC HEARING PARAMETERS ARE. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, STACEY.

IN ADDITION TO THAT IF YOU RECALL IN THE EARLIER SLIDES I MENTIONED THREE ZONES DISTRICTS THESE NEXT FEW SLIDES ADDRESS THOSE AMENDMENTS FOR THOSE ZONING DISTRICTS. IN THE URBAN VILLAGE DISTRIC THE STANDARDS WOULD BE AMENDSED TO INCLUDE THE MIXED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPE REQUIRING AN S.U.P.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. STACEY, THANK YOU.

IN THE URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT WHEREVER THERE IS MIXED RESIDENTIAL THAT PARAMETERS WOULD APPLY.

AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE BOLD COMPONENT TO THE MIXED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPE WILL REQUIRE AN S.U.P.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. COMMERCIAL STANDARDS.

IN THIS INSTANT MIXED RESIDENTIAL UNITS WE HAVE ADD THE LANGUAGE WILL REQUIRE THE APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT WILL BE EVALUATED AS PART OF A LARGER MIX USE DEVELOPMENT AND MAY ONLY OCCUPY 20% OF THAT LAND AREA. SO WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE IS THAT IN THE NORTH SHORE FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS TALKED ABOUT HAVING OR -- I'M SORRY I JUST LOST SIGNAL FOR A SECOND.

25% OF THAT QUOTA. THAT'S WHY THE S.U.P.

PARAMETER WOULD FALL INTO THIS REQUIREMENT.

[00:15:05]

THE DEFINITIONS WILL BE INCORPORATED IN THE FORM BASE CODE ARE IDENTIFIED THERE.

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, STACEY. EVERY ZONING ORDINANCE DOES HAVE A SCHEDULE OF USES IN THIS INSTANCE THE TABLE OF ALLOWABLE USES IN THE FORM BASE CODE WOULD BE AMENDED REFLECTING AN S FOR ALL THOSE DISTRICTS -- AS YOU CAN RECALL WE HAVE ALSO INCORPORATED THAT DEFINITION. NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE.

OF THE DOCUMENTS SO THERE ARE NO ELEMENT THAT'S ARE LEFT OUT. WE WILL BE ADDING THAT TO APPENDIX TOOL NEXT SLIDE PLEASE, STACEY.

THE PAST 12 SLIDES, 11 SLIDES DISCUSSED THE CODE IN PARTICULAR AND TALKED ABOUT THE AMENDMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CODE TALKED ABOUT THE INCLUSION OF AN S.U.P.

REQUIREMENT TALKED ABOUT THOSE THREE ZONING DISTRICTS THAT NEEDED TO BE AMENDED. AS I MENTIONED EARLIER ONE OF THE STRATEGIC PLANS THAT WE HAVE IS FOR THE NORTH SHORE. THE NORTH SHORE ALSO HAS A FRAMEWORK PLANNED RESULT THERE'S SOME SPECIFICITY -- IN THIS CASE FOR COMMENTS AND INDUSTRY -- WOULD HAVE TO BE AMENDED. BASICALLY THE AMENDMENTS -- AS IT RELATES TO THE MAXIMUM ALLOWANCE FOR UP TO 25% OF THE LAND AREA, IN THE COMMERCIAL BECAUSE THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT IN THE URBAN VILLAGE DISTRICT DOES NOT TIP LATE THIS REQUIREMENT SO WE'RE REALLY TRYING TO ALIGN THE TWO DOCUMENTS IN ESSENCE BECAUSE THAT S.U.P. REQUIREMENT WILL FULFILL THESE PARAMETERS.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. >> WHAT YOU SEE STRUCK THROUGH ON THE SLIDE IN FRONT OF YOU IS ACTUALLY A PROPOSED AMENDMENT IN THIS CASE THE URBAN VILLAGE DISTRICT AS I MENTIONED EARLIER THE 25% REQUIREMENT WOULD BE ELEMENTED FROM THAT.

THAT'S REFERENCED THERE. THEN AS YOU CAN SEE THE S.U.P. REQUIREMENT WOULD BE INTEGRATED IN THE COMMERCIAL CENTER DISTRICT. NEXT SLIDE PLEASE.

THE INTENT OF THE CHANGES THAT ARE BEING PROPOSED ARE PRIMARILY TO ALIGN THE FRAMEWORK PLANS WITH THE PROPOSED FORM BASE CODE TO KEEP THE VISION TO ENSURE A MORE THOROUGH AND ROBUST PUBLIC REVIEW PROCESS IS INJECTED INTO THE SYSTEM TO ENSURE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL. OVERALL VISION.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. WE FOLLOWED THE REQUIREMENTS AS IT RELATES TO AMENDMENTS TO A REGULATORY ORDINANCE IN ADDITION BECAUSE THE FRAMEWORK PLAN WAS BEING IS BEING PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED AND THE IT CAN BE CONSIDERED A ZONING DOCUMENT WE ALSO FOLLOWED THE PROCEDURE OF NOTE FILING EVERYBODY WITHIN THE NORTH SHORE.

WE ALSO NOTIFIED THE RADIUS AS A RESULT 688 NOTICES WERE WE DID RECEIVE -- FOUR IN FAVOR OF THE AMENDMENT.

SECTION 211060 OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE DOES REQUIRE A SUPERMAJORITY OR NO LESS THAN MEMBERS TO VOTE IN AFFIRMATIVE SHOULD ANY CHANGE TO A LAND USE REGULATION OR ZONING DISTRICT BE OPPOSED BY 20%.

THE REQUIREMENT FOR MAJORITY OR SUPERMAJORITY DOES NOT APPLY TO THE AREA OF THE CITY COVERED BY THE CODE AS ONLY 14% OF THE LAND AREA IS OWNED BY THOSE EXPRESSING THEIR OPPOSITION. HOWEVER OWNERS ABOUT SUBMIT A RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION. WE DID HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TO SOME OF THE INDIVIDUALS WHO SUBMITTED OPPOSITION RESPONSES IN OPPOSITION THEIR PRIMARY

[00:20:03]

NEXT SLIDE PLEASE SAFETY. DID HEAR THIS ITEM AT THE OCTOBER 13TH MEETING AND RECOMMENDED FAVORABLY.

NEXT SLIDE, PLEASE. FOR AGAIN, TO THE ITERATE AND CLOSE THE PRESENT ACHES THE PROPOSED CHANGES ARE APPROPRIATE BECAUSE THEY BETTER ALIGN WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY. BASICALLY I'M MORE COMPLIMENTARY OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THE FORM BASED CODE. I BELIEVE IT GIVES OPPORTUNITY FOR ADDITIONAL INPUT THROUGH THIS PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS. WITH THAT I WILL TRY AND ENTERTAIN ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.

>> THANK YOU SO MUCH. I APPRECIATE THAT UPDATE

AGAIN. >> DID WE EVER REACH OUT TO THOSE WHO WERE OPPOSED TO THIS BECAUSE IT LOOKED LIKE THEY WERE MISINFORMED. I WON'T SAY THAT WE REACHED OUT TO EVERY SINGLE PERSON. A LOT OF THE OPPOSITION THAT YOU DO SEE A LOT OF THE PROPERTIES THAT ARE OWNED BY SINGLE ENTITIES AS WELL. WE DID HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TO THOSE THAT HAD A LARGER OWNERSHIP WITH THE NORTH SHORE AS WELL AS SOME SMALLER AREAS.

OKAY, THANK YOU. >> AND THE PROPERTY OWNERS WEREN'T MISINFORMED. BUT SOME OF THE RESIDENTS THOUGHT WE WERE DOING THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT WE WERE

DOING. >> THAT'S WHAT I WAS SPEAKING TO. I WASN'T REALLY SPEAKING TO

THE PROPERTY OWNERS. >> I JUST WANT TO MAKE CLEAR TO THE PUBLIC WE UNDERSTAND THERE ARE SOME PROPERTY OWNERS THAT ARE NOT IN SUPPORT OF THIS.

>> CORRECT, ABSOLUTELY. I HAVE A COMMENT.

I WILL WAIT TO HOLD. THAT PAM YOU HAVE YOUR HAND

UP. >> I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS BUT I DID REACH OUT TO SOME OF MY NEIGHBORS THAT I KNOW THAT FILLED OUT THE PAPERWORK AND EXPLAINED

TO THEM WHAT WAS GOING ON. >> THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS BEFORE I OPEN IT UP TO PUBLIC HEARING. I DON'T SEE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME SO I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING IF ANYONE HAS A COMMENT STACEY YOU WILL TAKE OVER TO SEE IF THERE'S ANYBODY IN LINE.

>> WE HAVE NO CALLERS ON THE LINE.

>> OKAY WITH THAT BEING SAID I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I WILL ENTERTAIN LET'S SEE WE HAVE TWO THINGS,

RIGHT. >> YEAH.

I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON SPECIAL USE PERMITS YES, I WILL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL USE

PERMITS. >> ONE NEEDS TO HAVE A SUPERMAJORITY SO I THINK WE HAVE TO VOTE ON THEM SEPARATELY. IS THAT OKAY.

>> OKAY I HAVE A MOTION FROM BLAKE TO APPROVE THE REQUIREMENT OF USING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR MIXED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES IN MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS IS

THAT GOOD BLAKE. >> YES, MA'AM.

>> AND THEN. >> SECOND.

>> I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

ANY COMMENTS. BLAKE YOU STILL HAVE YOUR HAND UP DO YOU WANT TO MAKE A COMMENT NOW.

>> I WILL MAKE THE COMMENT AND THE SECOND APPROVAL.

>> OKAY. >> COUNCIL.

ANY OTHER COMMENTS. OKAY AT THIS TIME I WILL CALL THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR RAISE YOUR HAND. AND THAT PASSES 7-0.

AT THIS TIME AFTER A MOTION FOR THE SECOND PART OF THIS.

YOU CAN OFF THE WORDING. BLAKE DO YOU STILL HAVE YOUR

HAND UP? >> YES.

MAYOR. >> GO AHEAD.

>> YES I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO REVISE THE BUILDING TYPES PROVISION T OF A LARGER MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT IN THE

NORTH SHORE FRAMEWORK PLANS. >> THANK YOU, BLAKE.

DO I HAVE A SECOND? >> A SECOND.

[00:25:03]

>> WE HAVE A SECOND FROM WHITNEY, IS THAT RIGHT.

THANK YOU, WHITNEY. AT THIS TIME ARE THERE ANY

COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL? >> I JUT WANT TO MAKE SURE HE SAID THAT HE WANTS TO APPROVE THAT?

>> YES. >> DID I NOT SAY THAT I

APOLOGIZE. >> YOU DID NOT.

IT'S OKAY. >> THAT'S A GOOD POINT,

MATT. >> DEFINITELY APPROVAL.

>> ARE YOU ON THE PRO OR CON SIDE OF THIS DEBATE.

>> JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE. >> WHITNEY DO YOU STILL SECOND THAT. YES, I DO.

>> YES, I DO. I WANTED TO EXPRESS MY GRATITUDE FOR THEIR HARD WORK ON THIS ITEM.

I BELIEVE IT'S CRITICAL THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ON BEHALF OF THE CITIZENS HAVE A VOICE AND NEED APPROVAL OR DENIAL OF THE ADDITIONAL MULTIFAMILY IN THE CITY.

I SUBSEQUENTLY BELIEVE IT IS THAT THE VITAL WHAT WE SAFEGUARD THE NORTH SHORE FROM UNWANTED OR UNVISIONED DEVELOPMENT FOR THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

I BELIEVE IN PROVING THIS APPROVING THIS ITEM WILL ACCOMPLISH BOTH OF THOSE MEANS.

AGAIN I APPRECIATE THE TEAM FOR ALL OF THEIR HARD WORK.

REALLY APPRECIATE THAT. >> FROM ALL OF US.

VERY PORN WORK. SO THANK YOU.

>> YOU -- VERY IMPORTANT WORK.

TO THANK YOU. UH-HUH.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR RAISE YOUR HANDS?

>> THAT REQUIRED A SUPERMAJORITY AND IT PASSED 7-0. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

THAT CONCLUDES OUR REGULAR MEETING.

[2. EXECUTIVE SESSION ]

I WILL READ THAT INTO THE RECORD.

ITEM 2 A THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL CONVENE PURSUANT SECTION 551-087 TO UPDATE THE COUNCIL AND DISCUSS COMMERCIAL OR FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND THE OFFER INCENTIVIZES THAT THE CITY MAY SEEK TO HAVE LOCATE STAY OR EXPANDED IN ROW THELET WITH WHICH THE CITY IS CONDUCTING BUSINESS. SO COUNCIL WE'LL TAKE A BRIEF FIVE MINUTE BREAK GO AHEAD AND EXIT OUT OF THE REGULAR MEETING AND GO INTO THE EXECUTIVE SESSION.

AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE EXECUTIVE SESSION WE WILL COME BACK INTO REGULAR SESSION AND CONCLUDE THE REGULAR MEE

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.